Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Next step for Peterborough MP Fiona Onasanya – facing a recall

124

Comments

  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    Labour Live organizers will be on the phone shortly asking if they can book for this years festival....

    Belgium anti-Semitism row over stereotyped Jews in carnival float

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47454415

    Given your not a Tory as we've discussed before and you are usually all over racism stories I thought you would have been all over the Tory racism story today...

    Strangely for someone who is usually such a valiant fighter against discrimination instead nothing much. I don't want to be cynical so I'll just assume you'll be posting lots about it soon.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,491
    edited March 2019

    Given your not a Tory as we've discussed before and you are usually all over racism stories I thought you would have been all over the Tory racism story today...

    Strangely for someone who is usually such a valiant fighter against discrimination instead nothing much. I don't want to be cynical so I'll just assume you'll be posting lots about it soon.
    I have only just got in...14 suspended by all accounts in no uncertain terms, no messing about, no ifs, no buts. Good.

    While we are hearing Labour leaders office been up to all sorts trying to not suspend people.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,170
    Latest TIG email talks about a new website so I guess they will be changing name for the new party.
  • Given your not a Tory as we've discussed before and you are usually all over racism stories I thought you would have been all over the Tory racism story today...

    Strangely for someone who is usually such a valiant fighter against discrimination instead nothing much. I don't want to be cynical so I'll just assume you'll be posting lots about it soon.
    *You're.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,480

    I read this at university. I cannot bear Schama’s florid prise style.
    Yeah - that's what sends me to sleep I think. Nonetheless there is merit in his work if you can get past that.

    Would you do me a great favour and PM me if you do find a really captivating account?

    I'm reading Robert Fisk's account of the middle east at the moment. It's a very good book. (And a really ghastly read for humanity)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,038

    The problem is that if Farage campaigns successfully it might drive votes to UKIP rather than to his new party because the brand linkage is so strong.
    Which would still be votes lost from.the main parties
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    I have only just got in...14 suspended by all accounts in no uncertain terms, no messing about, no ifs, no buts. Good.

    While we are hearing Labour leaders office been up to all sorts trying to not suspend people.
    And the candidate who was suspended and then came back in and became a candidate again, or what about the hundreds of posts on facebook groups in support of Tories about bombing mosques and such...

    Not forgetting Boris remarks and lack of suspension.

    I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this, you bang on and on about Labour for political reasons but nothing on the Conservatives from you. You are free to do what you like of course but don't expect me to take your criticisms seriously when they only go one way.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,090
    The removal of tariffs also means other countries have less incentive to do trade deals . And UK exporters will end up being priced out of foreign markets .

    This looks like the capitalism on steroids so beloved of the Mogg cult .
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,038
    edited March 2019
    justin124 said:

    I suspect you underestimate the extent to which voters - including Leave voters - are keen to move on from Brexit. He probably lacks the receptive audience of 2015/2016 when much of his support was based on anti-establishment feelings rather than the EU issue per se. Many are now likely to seek alternative vehicles as a means of venting their displeasure.
    You underestimate the anger if Brexit was revoked amongst Leave voters, there is a real chance of an SNP style 2015 surge for a new Farage Party at the expense of the Tories and Labour if that happened, the LDs and TIG certainly would not be benefiting.

    Leave voters are only keen to move on from Brexit if Brexit is delivered first
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,491
    edited March 2019

    And the candidate who was suspended and then came back in and became a candidate again, or what about the hundreds of posts on facebook groups in support of Tories about bombing mosques and such...

    Not forgetting Boris remarks and lack of suspension.

    I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this, you bang on and on about Labour for political reasons but nothing on the Conservatives from you. You are free to do what you like of course but don't expect me to take your criticisms seriously when they only go one way.
    That's weird, I attack the Tories on a daily basis on here...You will be extremely hard pressed to find a positive post I have made about the Maybot ever.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    *You're.
    I successfully navigated the your you're maze in my latest post though!
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,838
    nico67 said:

    This looks like the capitalism on steroids so beloved of the Mogg cult .

    Which gives them an incentive to vote against the deal...
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    That's weird, I attack the Tories on a daily basis on here...You will be extremely hard pressed to find a positive post I have made about the Maybot ever.
    What is weird is your obsession with Labour discrimination issues but your complete lack of interest in Conservative ones.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,307
    HYUFD said:

    No, Boris knows how to win votes, like him or loathe him as his Mayoral wins and the Leave win showed
    Things have moved on a lot since then.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,038

    Things have moved on a lot since then.
    Boris still leads the polls of both Tory members and voters as their preference to succeed May
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    nico67 said:

    The removal of tariffs also means other countries have less incentive to do trade deals . And UK exporters will end up being priced out of foreign markets .

    This looks like the capitalism on steroids so beloved of the Mogg cult .

    It looks like what works. Nations like New Zealand have gone from strength to strength removing tariffs and have been able to negotiate trade deals without putting up mammoth tariffs.

    When are people going to stop acting like corn laws work?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    And the candidate who was suspended and then came back in and became a candidate again, or what about the hundreds of posts on facebook groups in support of Tories about bombing mosques and such...

    Not forgetting Boris remarks and lack of suspension.

    I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this, you bang on and on about Labour for political reasons but nothing on the Conservatives from you. You are free to do what you like of course but don't expect me to take your criticisms seriously when they only go one way.
    What Boris remarks? You mean the remarks that were entirely reasonable that got blown up, investigated and cleared?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,296

    I successfully navigated the your you're maze in my latest post though!
    Your singing you're own praises their.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331

    I successfully navigated the your you're maze in my latest post though!
    You mean the one in which you wrote 'I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this'?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,090

    Which gives them an incentive to vote against the deal...
    Perhaps it’s a trap to get them to vote against ! But seriously the removal of tariffs calls into question any trade deals because the UK loses its leverage . Why would a country need to do that , its exports move in tariff free and the UKs exports going the other way get shafted .

    The problem is much of the general public don’t see the problems because they’ll be duped into thinking it’s good for consumers but won’t see the other side which could cost lots of jobs .
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    What is weird is your obsession with Labour discrimination issues but your complete lack of interest in Conservative ones.
    Right back at ya
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    You underestimate the anger if Brexit was revoked amongst Leave voters, there is a real chance of an SNP style 2015 surge for a new Farage Party at the expense of the Tories and Labour if that happened, the LDs and TIG certainly would not be benefiting.

    Leave voters are only keen to move on from Brexit if Brexit is delivered first
    That may apply to those who had supported UKIP for EU related reasons but will not extend to the many who were voting UKIP a few years back as a protest vote - in paricular as an alternative to the LibDems who had often benefitted in the same way prior to entering the Coalition. Time will tell!
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,296

    You mean the one in which you wrote 'I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this'?
    Have we decided to abandon you're on PB?
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    edited March 2019

    Your singing you're own praises their.
    My glorious rain as spelling king will last forever...



    You mean the one in which you wrote 'I don't want to just insult you but TBH your a complete hypocrite on this'?

    Or not.

    Edit: Off to play football now so I'll enjoy further corrections when I return!
  • ralphmalphralphmalph Posts: 2,201
    nico67 said:

    The removal of tariffs also means other countries have less incentive to do trade deals . And UK exporters will end up being priced out of foreign markets .

    This looks like the capitalism on steroids so beloved of the Mogg cult .

    The theory is aka Minford, that if you reduce your input costs to business (we do not produce everything) then your exports look after themselves.

    A 2% odd tariff is meaningless in terms of protectionism but is just a cost plus the paperowrk cost to business.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331

    Have we decided to abandon you're on PB?
    Looks like it: using grammar correctly is merely a bourgeois affectation.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976

    My glorious rain as spelling king will last forever... Or not.

    Edit: Off to play football now so I'll enjoy further corrections when I return!
    While he's out, can we vote on whether we think he spelled "reign" wrongly on purpose, or by accident?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited March 2019

    The theory is aka Minford, that if you reduce your input costs to business (we do not produce everything) then your exports look after themselves.

    A 2% odd tariff is meaningless in terms of protectionism but is just a cost plus the paperowrk cost to business.
    Indeed. Tariffs don't work.

    The only time a tariff will make a difference is if they are a significant burden. And guess what, then they're a significant burden.
  • NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,329

    What Boris remarks? You mean the remarks that were entirely reasonable that got blown up, investigated and cleared?
    Just ignore him. He clearly doesn’t think anti semitism is serious. Grown up parties deal with these things - Labour wallows in it. A one man campaign on here trying to equivocate about Labours issues whilst spreading fake news about other parties might seem like a reasonable way to spend your time to you. The more you point at others the more it looks like you cannot or will not take seriously the issues in Labour. Every post makes it look like you care even less about anti semitism in Labour and what it means. Meanwhile in the real world MPs are leaving the party because of it
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    To be fair to 'TheJezziah' I think everyone's favourite Tory, BigG, was being a little disingenuous when, down-thread, he characterised the Baronness's intervention as being simply about Boris. She has, in fact, claimed that the Tory Party is institutionally Islamophobic - and that TMay has been turning a blind-eye to that. The evidence of a parallel is there.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    nico67 said:

    Perhaps it’s a trap to get them to vote against ! But seriously the removal of tariffs calls into question any trade deals because the UK loses its leverage . Why would a country need to do that , its exports move in tariff free and the UKs exports going the other way get shafted .

    The problem is much of the general public don’t see the problems because they’ll be duped into thinking it’s good for consumers but won’t see the other side which could cost lots of jobs .
    Because trade deals don't just deal with tariffs. They deal with other burdens like NTBs, equivalence, paperwork and more. And the 10% of tariffs that still apply will be dealt with too.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,243
    Just sent a text to a friend about something I'd seen at the local Coop. My iPhone tried to autocomplete it to "Cooper-Letwin Amendment". Ever get the feeling this has all gone a bit far?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    DougSeal said:

    Physical force republicanism to the House of Lords is a hell of a journey.
    I think he was only an Irish peer so didn’t get a seat in the Lords, but Pratt’s is explicitly designed to be somewhere you never know who you’ll sit next to at dinner
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,502

    To be fair to 'TheJezziah' I think everyone's favourite Tory, BigG, was being a little disingenuous when, down-thread, he characterised the Baronness's intervention as being simply about Boris. She has, in fact, claimed that the Tory Party is institutionally Islamophobic - and that TMay has been turning a blind-eye to that. The evidence of a parallel is there.

    More prominent Conservative Muslims, like Sajid Javid, Sayeed Kamal, and Nusrat Ghani, reject her allegations.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,038
    edited March 2019
    justin124 said:

    That may apply to those who had supported UKIP for EU related reasons but will not extend to the many who were voting UKIP a few years back as a protest vote - in paricular as an alternative to the LibDems who had often benefitted in the same way prior to entering the Coalition. Time will tell!
    17 million people voted Leave, almost 4 times the 4.3 million who voted UKIP at the 2014 European elections or the 3.8 million who voted UKIP at the 2015 general election, if Brexit were to be revoked and that Leave vote reversed Farage's party and UKIP would see a protest vote from betrayed Leavers which would dwarf the 2010 to 2015 one
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,536
    It would appear that Sky Sports and Marca have been spreading FAKE NEWS:

    https://twitter.com/TheIFAB/status/1102946802305777664
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited March 2019

    To be fair to 'TheJezziah' I think everyone's favourite Tory, BigG, was being a little disingenuous when, down-thread, he characterised the Baronness's intervention as being simply about Boris. She has, in fact, claimed that the Tory Party is institutionally Islamophobic - and that TMay has been turning a blind-eye to that. The evidence of a parallel is there.

    Just because she says it doesn't make it right. She also equates legitimate criticism of Islam [and extreme Islam or cultural issues] as Islamophobia.

    Then again Warsi shares a lot in common with the Corbynistas who equate attacking Jews with the actions of Israel.
    https://twitter.com/SayeedaWarsi/status/534651391592378368
    https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/534686710991716352
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    Sean_F said:

    More prominent Conservative Muslims, like Sajid Javid, Sayeed Kamal, and Nusrat Ghani, reject her allegations.
    They may do, but the evidence is there. Just as a few obscure Labour activists are tweeting anti-Semitic tropes, so a few equivalents in the Tory backwaters approvingly retweet Tommy R.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,651

    To be fair to 'TheJezziah' I think everyone's favourite Tory, BigG, was being a little disingenuous when, down-thread, he characterised the Baronness's intervention as being simply about Boris. She has, in fact, claimed that the Tory Party is institutionally Islamophobic - and that TMay has been turning a blind-eye to that. The evidence of a parallel is there.

    There may well be issues with a dislike of Muslims within some within the Tory party and those who behave badly towards Muslim Tory MPs should be disciplined. There should be no argument about that. The last thing the Tories should do is ignore small problems and watch them become big ones, as Labour have done.

    Warsi is, however, not entirely reliable on this issue. Both while she was a Minister and increasingly since being dismissed she has severely criticised those like Saira Khan who have tried to do much to stop Islamist extremism and speak up for liberal Muslims and has associated herself with some very dubious extremist Muslim groups who express views which ought to be abhorrent to any decent Tory, any decent Labour person, frankly, any decent person. If she wants to criticise hatred against Muslims and be taken seriously, she should not associate herself with outfits like MEND and Interpal who preach hatred against people who are not Muslims.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976

    They may do, but the evidence is there. Just as a few obscure Labour activists are tweeting anti-Semitic tropes, so a few equivalents in the Tory backwaters approvingly retweet Tommy R.
    You'd really have thought that the much larger, better organised, more tech-savvy, better motivated legion of Corbyn fans on social media would be doing a better job of highlighting this. Maybe they're all too busy?
  • BannedInParisBannedInParis Posts: 2,191
    "a few obscure Labour activists"

    take is hot
  • To be fair to 'TheJezziah' I think everyone's favourite Tory, BigG, was being a little disingenuous when, down-thread, he characterised the Baronness's intervention as being simply about Boris. She has, in fact, claimed that the Tory Party is institutionally Islamophobic - and that TMay has been turning a blind-eye to that. The evidence of a parallel is there.

    I commented Boris was in her sights but of course others are and they must be dealt with
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Just sent a text to a friend about something I'd seen at the local Coop. My iPhone tried to autocomplete it to "Cooper-Letwin Amendment". Ever get the feeling this has all gone a bit far?

    LOL!
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    .
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Cyclefree said:

    There may well be issues with a dislike of Muslims within some within the Tory party and those who behave badly towards Muslim Tory MPs should be disciplined. There should be no argument about that. The last thing the Tories should do is ignore small problems and watch them become big ones, as Labour have done.

    Warsi is, however, not entirely reliable on this issue. Both while she was a Minister and increasingly since being dismissed she has severely criticised those like Saira Khan who have tried to do much to stop Islamist extremism and speak up for liberal Muslims and has associated herself with some very dubious extremist Muslim groups who express views which ought to be abhorrent to any decent Tory, any decent Labour person, frankly, any decent person. If she wants to criticise hatred against Muslims and be taken seriously, she should not associate herself with outfits like MEND and Interpal who preach hatred against people who are not Muslims.
    Precisely. When she chooses to be on the side of MEND and associate with people happy to be with Cage but opposes the Commissioner for Counter Extremism then she should look at the mirror when wondering where the problem is.

    https://www.thejc.com/news/news-features/puzzle-of-baroness-sayeeda-warsi-s-links-with-islamist-group-1.463152
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    Cyclefree said:

    There may well be issues with a dislike of Muslims within some within the Tory party and those who behave badly towards Muslim Tory MPs should be disciplined. There should be no argument about that. The last thing the Tories should do is ignore small problems and watch them become big ones, as Labour have done.

    Warsi is, however, not entirely reliable on this issue. Both while she was a Minister and increasingly since being dismissed she has severely criticised those like Saira Khan who have tried to do much to stop Islamist extremism and speak up for liberal Muslims and has associated herself with some very dubious extremist Muslim groups who express views which ought to be abhorrent to any decent Tory, any decent Labour person, frankly, any decent person. If she wants to criticise hatred against Muslims and be taken seriously, she should not associate herself with outfits like MEND and Interpal who preach hatred against people who are not Muslims.
    Yes, I certainly wouldn't want to identify with everything Warsi stands for. But I think she is right to say that Islamophobia exists in the Tory Party. Personally, I think both major parties are increasingly attractive to extremists, and frankly, as currently they're both led, neither is now fit to govern. The emergence of TIG does for the first time give me a little hope that there may soon be a party I could conceivably vote for. I'm still some way from optimism, though.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331

    I commented Boris was in her sights but of course others are and they must be dealt with
    Fair enough. I agree.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    Indeed so - but people voted in the Referendum on both sides because they were exhorted to do so over an extended campaign period of several months. Many voted without having strong feelings on the issue one way or the other - myself included - and a considerable number were clearly very uncertain about an issue which to them was highly technical. Most people were somewhere in the middle - and in the end came down on one side or the other . I suspect that relatively few really felt they understood the issues at stake, and whilst a minority will doubtless be up in arms the majority will be very keen to move on.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    edited March 2019
    Endillion said:

    You'd really have thought that the much larger, better organised, more tech-savvy, better motivated legion of Corbyn fans on social media would be doing a better job of highlighting this. Maybe they're all too busy?
    They won't be turning their attention to the Tories until they've rooted out all the Blairites - Tom Watson, in particular.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    They won't be turning their attention to the Tories until they've rooted out all the Blairites - Tom Watson, in particular.
    Tom Watson was a Brownite - no Blairite.
  • ralphmalphralphmalph Posts: 2,201
    How much is Harry Kane worth on the transfer market?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,330
    Charles said:

    My favourite networking story is from a dinner at Pratt’s. My father was sitting between a senior British soldier and an Irish peer with republican leanings (this was shortkyvafter the GFA).

    Over the course of dinner they figured out that they had each - literally - had the other in their sights during the Troubles but couldn’t take the shot for some reason
    Your father had a Provo AND a Rupert in his sights? Some man yer da!
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    justin124 said:

    Tom Watson was a Brownite - no Blairite.
    Yes, I clearly need an irony emoji.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331

    How much is Harry Kane worth on the transfer market?

    I think we'll find out this summer.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    DougSeal said:

    1) Elected representatives have every right to act within their competencies however they see fit and are answerable only to their constituents at an election. The referendum binds no-one legally or morally. No one has the right to break the law. The referendum was an instruction to the executive, who have failed to carry it out with any competence, not the legislature. As the famous eaflet said “The Government will...” - it didn’t and couldn’t bind Parliament.

    2) “Refusing to carry it out” appears to mean that those who voted for Artlce 50 and also the Withdrawal Agreement. That is wholly in keeping with the referendum.

    MPs answer to their constituents at elections. Any suggestion that it is in any way legitimate for them to be swayed by violence or threads thereof by individuals is the exact opposite of democracy.
    Bit odd that Max didn't respond to that. A cynic (moi?) might suggest that he'd received a thorough hiding in that exchange.

    All the "will of the people" types are really doing, of course, is seeking to disenfranchise the 48%.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,502

    Just because she says it doesn't make it right. She also equates legitimate criticism of Islam [and extreme Islam or cultural issues] as Islamophobia.

    Then again Warsi shares a lot in common with the Corbynistas who equate attacking Jews with the actions of Israel.
    https://twitter.com/SayeedaWarsi/status/534651391592378368
    https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/534686710991716352
    That's a nasty comment from her. As you say, she needs to look in the mirror.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    How in the name of all that is holy is a Labour life peer and former Labour cabiner minister possibly being described as "independent" with regards to an investigation into the Labour party? What, indeed, is an "independent friend" to begin with?

    He doesn't so much have a conflict of interest as an entire sequence of military campaigns of them.
  • ralphmalphralphmalph Posts: 2,201

    I think we'll find out this summer.
    I agree.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Cyclefree said:

    There may well be issues with a dislike of Muslims within some within the Tory party and those who behave badly towards Muslim Tory MPs should be disciplined. There should be no argument about that. The last thing the Tories should do is ignore small problems and watch them become big ones, as Labour have done.

    Warsi is, however, not entirely reliable on this issue. Both while she was a Minister and increasingly since being dismissed she has severely criticised those like Saira Khan who have tried to do much to stop Islamist extremism and speak up for liberal Muslims and has associated herself with some very dubious extremist Muslim groups who express views which ought to be abhorrent to any decent Tory, any decent Labour person, frankly, any decent person. If she wants to criticise hatred against Muslims and be taken seriously, she should not associate herself with outfits like MEND and Interpal who preach hatred against people who are not Muslims.
    Tories might have a islamophobic problem but labour have one also in it's mass muslim vote that is sending some parts of the party backwards in policy.

    Shabana Mahmood under fire for comments on LGBT lessons in schools

    https://labourlist.org/2019/03/shabana-mahmood-under-fire-for-comments-on-lgbt-lessons-in-schools/
  • Hopefully in a few moments we'll get

    'The batsman's Holder the bowler's Willey'
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,518
    Wasn't someone claiming yesterday that the London property market was a disaster ?

    ' London’s skyline continues to head upwards, with a record 76 tall buildings due to be completed this year, a three-fold increase from 2018.

    The number of tall towers – more than 20 storeys high – planned or under construction has also hit a new record of 541, up from 510 in 2017, according to the latest research from the industry forum New London Architecture (NLA). '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/05/tall-buildings-london-skyline-2019
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    This Charlie Falconer story reads as if a PBer has written the screenplay. More innovative sequel than direct remake.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Your father had a Provo AND a Rupert in his sights? Some man yer da!
    Only over dinner - it was the other two who’d been eyeing each other up. (You’ll be pleased to know they compromised on whisky)
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621

    Wasn't someone claiming yesterday that the London property market was a disaster ?

    ' London’s skyline continues to head upwards, with a record 76 tall buildings due to be completed this year, a three-fold increase from 2018.

    The number of tall towers – more than 20 storeys high – planned or under construction has also hit a new record of 541, up from 510 in 2017, according to the latest research from the industry forum New London Architecture (NLA). '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/05/tall-buildings-london-skyline-2019

    Last days of the Aztecs.
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    Wasn't someone claiming yesterday that the London property market was a disaster ?

    ' London’s skyline continues to head upwards, with a record 76 tall buildings due to be completed this year, a three-fold increase from 2018.

    The number of tall towers – more than 20 storeys high – planned or under construction has also hit a new record of 541, up from 510 in 2017, according to the latest research from the industry forum New London Architecture (NLA). '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/05/tall-buildings-london-skyline-2019

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.buyassociation.co.uk/2019/03/04/rightmove-reveals-average-london-house-price-up-3-4-per-cent-and-eu-buyers-are-here-to-stay/amp/
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,838
    Charles said:

    Only over dinner - it was the other two who’d been eyeing each other up. (You’ll be pleased to know they compromised on whisky)
    Did they discovery any common ancestry with Brian Boru?
  • Real Madrid 0 - Ajax 3 (2 -4)

  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,330
    Charles said:

    Only over dinner - it was the other two who’d been eyeing each other up. (You’ll be pleased to know they compromised on whisky)
    Shame, I was picturing your dad as some kind of soldier of fortune gone rogue taking feckers out all over the shop.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,566

    Just sent a text to a friend about something I'd seen at the local Coop. My iPhone tried to autocomplete it to "Cooper-Letwin Amendment". Ever get the feeling this has all gone a bit far?

    Brilliant
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    A J A X !
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    MaxPB said:

    Not really. What you're suggesting is that the people should have no reaction when MPs conspire to subvert democracy, they should just shut up and accept it, do as they are told by their masters.
    Even when their masters are Russians????
  • Anorak said:

    Last days of the Aztecs.
    Ooh. Are they ziggurats at the top of which we can sacrifice our enemies to placate the gods? That’s one way to refocus on knife crime
  • Real -1 Ajax 4 (yes 4)
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,716

    I commented Boris was in her sights but of course others are and they must be dealt with
    It is not as though the Tories aren’t well practiced in denialism.... the police numbers/stabbings thing being only the most recent example.

  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,045
    MaxPB said:

    Not really. What you're suggesting is that the people should have no reaction when MPs conspire to subvert democracy, they should just shut up and accept it, do as they are told by their masters.
    Personally, I think your claim that the only alternatives are "shut up and accept it, do as [you are] told" or to react with violence are a grossly false dichotomy and a horrible position to take.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,530

    Yes, I clearly need an irony emoji.
    The Jezzuits don't recognise the difference.

    As it happens they have buried the hatchet and are working together to Save Labour.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,530
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Real -1 Ajax 4 (yes 4)

    Not sure which is the biggest shock from this round? Real going out or Spurs utterly cruising through.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,106
    Got the third email from TIG this evening, with news of their meeting with the Electoral Commission. They say they have discussed forming a political party but aren't going to make a decision until after the events they are planning around the country.

    They attach their "roadmap", saying they plan to change politics and will be seeking views through a new website and at their launch events.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,838
    St Pancras being evacuated.
  • Not sure which is the biggest shock from this round? Real going out or Spurs utterly cruising through.
    Real scoreline is astonishing
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,537
    Charles said:

    Only over dinner - it was the other two who’d been eyeing each other up. (You’ll be pleased to know they compromised on whisky)
    How so? Did they agree that one wouldn't have Glenfiddich and the other wouldn't touch Jameson's the solution was Jack Daniels?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Real scoreline is astonishing
    Especially at home. Spurs winning 4-0 on aggregate is quite impressive too. Even if it is 'only' against Dortmund.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,090
    Just looking at the numbers for or against no deal next week in the event Mays deal doesn’t get through .

    The Spelman Dromey amendement passed 318 to 310 to rule out no deal .

    5 Labour MPs voted against that . It’s hard to see more Labour MPs voting for no deal .

    On the government side if May whips to not rule out no deal she’s likely to see a host of resignations which suggests the vote against no deal should clearly win . Also several Scottish Tory MPs have said they won’t back no deal as they fear it would embolden the SNPs drive for another Indy vote .

    I can’t see May whipping to rule out no deal so a free vote would seem the safest option . That’s more likely to keep her government intact .

    The big question how does May vote herself ? That could end up being very interesting .
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,537

    Real scoreline is astonishing
    Anyone looking with think it's a fake...
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,536

    St Pancras being evacuated.

    Underground station - fire alert by the sounds of it.
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124

    Wasn't someone claiming yesterday that the London property market was a disaster ?

    ' London’s skyline continues to head upwards, with a record 76 tall buildings due to be completed this year, a three-fold increase from 2018.

    The number of tall towers – more than 20 storeys high – planned or under construction has also hit a new record of 541, up from 510 in 2017, according to the latest research from the industry forum New London Architecture (NLA). '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/05/tall-buildings-london-skyline-2019

    Part of the reason prices are weaker is 541 towers-worth of new accommodation.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,566
    Scott_P said:
    They'd be beyond stupid to not give Falconer whatever assurances he needs to accept the role at this point.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,566
    edited March 2019
    Too late for what? His and Watson's efforts, although not in tandem, will prevent further defections of MPs at least. Yes, there are other effects, not least Jewish Labour, but I think we know what the focus is for now
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Cameron’s legacy - EU referendum, giving Warsi a job and letting May become PM by resigning.

    Jesus.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,537
    kle4 said:

    They'd be beyond stupid to not give Falconer whatever assurances he needs to accept the role at this point.
    So, being realistic, he's going to be forced to refuse due to the restrictions Corbyn will place on him?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,227
    I expect Onasunya will be an MP longer than Solaris keeps the Real Madrid job
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,038
    justin124 said:

    A minority could be enough for Brexit Party/UKIP to win under FPTP, even 25% from angry Leavers could give them the balance of power in a hung parliament if Brexit were revoked
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,536
    Always look on the bright side of life

    Ajax fans in the Bernabeu.
This discussion has been closed.