Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New Survation CON voter poll finds that 50% say Brexit should

135

Comments

  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,912
    tpfkar said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    The "once unimaginable concessions" include paying the UK's share of the EU pension fund. Right...

    ...for another 46 years...
    You might need a magnifying glass to see those contributions:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYLvjK0WAAApOK_.jpg

    It'd be interesting to see what the status quo scenario looks like, £10bn /annum for ever...
    Well this one area which I agree on.
    Our contributions will be negligible in short order, and we were never going to stiff our own pensioners.

    However, that’s a long way from Boris’s “go whistle” and of course we ain’t never seeing that money for the NHS.

    And lost economic growth more than compensates for “savings” from our contributions.
    You don't think both parties will be going into the next election promising to spend the money otherwise earmarked for the EU on their various pet projects?
    They can promise what they want. In practice it will be dwarfed by needing to pay client rates not partner rates for EU agencies we want to be part of, far more than that if we want to replicate regulators ourselves, just as much to farmers, and the loss from inferior trade deals (Liam Fox's stunning brilliance not withstanding.)

    But we will be free.
    Blue passports, son.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295
    Scott_P said:
    I think Serge Orlov posts on here, under various names.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Well indeed. Or a Moonie.

    Both parties are now being led on platforms that threaten our jobs and living standards.
    We are already one of the slowest growing country in the G20, and we’re told to expect several more years of wage stagnation despite the world economy seeing the fastest growth since 2007.

    But, hey, Moonies. Hur-hur.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,898
    Scott_P said:
    Up to 4% of annual turnover, and potential mass claims for compensation....
    https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/dpa-and-gdpr-penalties
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,371
    tpfkar said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    The "once unimaginable concessions" include paying the UK's share of the EU pension fund. Right...

    ...for another 46 years...
    You might need a magnifying glass to see those contributions:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYLvjK0WAAApOK_.jpg

    It'd be interesting to see what the status quo scenario looks like, £10bn /annum for ever...
    Well this one area which I agree on.
    Our contributions will be negligible in short order, and we were never going to stiff our own pensioners.

    However, that’s a long way from Boris’s “go whistle” and of course we ain’t never seeing that money for the NHS.

    And lost economic growth more than compensates for “savings” from our contributions.
    You don't think both parties will be going into the next election promising to spend the money otherwise earmarked for the EU on their various pet projects?
    They can promise what they want. In practice it will be dwarfed by needing to pay client rates not partner rates for EU agencies we want to be part of, far more than that if we want to replicate regulators ourselves, just as much to farmers, and the loss from inferior trade deals (Liam Fox's stunning brilliance not withstanding.)

    But we will be free.
    The client rates for those agencies is tiny compared to the cost of EU membership. You are just dreaming up issues where they don't exist.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,238
    Scott_P said:
    As always everyone is putting their own "spin" on things - Which you expect in a negotiation?
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677
    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal

    Theresa needs to get the fishermen to pipe down on this pronto - promise them £350 million a week, say we'll retake our waters with an armada, anything. Fishing and fishermen hold a huge romantic place in the British heart. If the the public get wind we've sold them down the swanny then it will make Theresa look like the ultimate saboteur and completely tarnish the Brexit brand.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,542

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Well indeed. Or a Moonie.

    Both parties are now being led on platforms that threaten our jobs and living standards.
    We are already one of the slowest growing country in the G20, and we’re told to expect several more years of wage stagnation despite the world economy seeing the fastest growth since 2007.

    But, hey, Moonies. Hur-hur.
    Well, there's more to life than money. Simple as that.
  • Full on remainer panic at present
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677

    Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
  • Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
    They have seen a hard Brexit disappear and a transistion agreement that once signed will ensure we leave the EU
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    Anazina said:

    Mr. P, Pyrrhic should be capitalised.

    Seems a rather stuffy insistence. Like champagne it is now a general descriptive term sanctioned by usage, hence the leading capital seems de trop, despite the fact that the etymology is from a proper noun.
    Surely a Remainer should capitalise Champagne. It is IIRC a restricted definition. Like Cornish pasties, although the latter doersn’t have a capital P.
    Not at all. While it is true that champagne comes only from Champagne and scotch comes only from Scotland, the product names are such major categories and in such common usage that adding a leading capital is clearly de trop. So Aberlour is a kind of scotch and Cristal is a type of champagne. And Davis has scored a pyrrhic victory.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
  • Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,259
    GIN1138 said:

    Scott_P said:
    As always everyone is putting their own "spin" on things - Which you expect in a negotiation?
    A deal that sticks will look just like that: everyone shouting they’ve won at the expense of the other.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Scott_P said:
    What an embarrassingly stupid tweet. I presently belong to the AA (cars, not drink). When my membership expires in 3 months I intend to move to the RAC because I find the AA increasingly hopeless and the RAC offer a better deal. If my car breaks down tomorrow and call the AA to fix it do I risk being pointed at and laughed at by a bunch of twitter morons, and why?
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,692

    GIN1138 said:

    Scott_P said:
    As always everyone is putting their own "spin" on things - Which you expect in a negotiation?
    A deal that sticks will look just like that: everyone shouting they’ve won at the expense of the other.
    Funny that, since a negotiation should be win-win.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677

    Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
    They have seen a hard Brexit disappear and a transistion agreement that once signed will ensure we leave the EU
    So Remainers are panicking because their nightmare scenario of hard Brexit has disappeared? That's a novel analysis of the psychology of desire. But, of course, hard Brexit hasn't disappeared: the EU can enforce it at any time during the transition period.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Scott_P said:
    Well, it's a serious winge on Twitter so far.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    Eh? Who’s talking about the WTO?
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
    They have seen a hard Brexit disappear and a transistion agreement that once signed will ensure we leave the EU
    So Remainers are panicking because their nightmare scenario of hard Brexit has disappeared? That's a novel analysis of the psychology of desire. But, of course, hard Brexit hasn't disappeared: the EU can enforce it at any time during the transition period.
    If the idea that human beings are capable of wishing for otherwise disastrous outcomes for the pleasure of saying "I told you so" is novel to you, even after spending time reading this board, I suggest you steer clear of the topic of psychology.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,489
    edited March 2018
    Sex Governor and The City.

    Go Miranda.

    https://twitter.com/CynthiaNixon/status/975794613221982209
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
  • TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    No need to be offensive
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,238

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    Eh? Who’s talking about the WTO?
    A lot of Remainers have been hoping for no deal/WTO in the belief that Parliament (or the voters via EU Ref 2) would call the whole thing off.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295
    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    And poorer. And less powerful.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    "That Jimmy Saville - he ran the marathons on time.."

    Pope-ish does as Pope-ish is.

  • GIN1138 said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    Eh? Who’s talking about the WTO?
    A lot of Remainers have been hoping for no deal/WTO in the belief that Parliament (or the voters via EU Ref 2) would call the whole thing off.
    Exactly
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    No need to be offensive
    Sozza Big G - was meant to be a rhetorical flourish rather than an insult.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,906

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
  • TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    No need to be offensive
    Sozza Big G - was meant to be a rhetorical flourish rather than an insult.
    Your first sentence was unnecessary. The rest was your held view and that is fair enough
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Scott_P said:
    What an embarrassingly stupid tweet. I presently belong to the AA (cars, not drink). When my membership expires in 3 months I intend to move to the RAC because I find the AA increasingly hopeless and the RAC offer a better deal. If my car breaks down tomorrow and call the AA to fix it do I risk being pointed at and laughed at by a bunch of twitter morons, and why?
    The article reminds of those descriptions of Britain you'd see in the foreign media in the 1970s - about how the seat of Empire was now a rotting slum of graffiti-scrawled streets and glue-sniffing skinheads. Nevertheless, one would think that Mr Brexit, who hot footed over to France to get his operation done, wouldn't partake in the sneering at his homeland.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    And poorer. And less powerful.
    Oh god yes but I didn’t think Brexiters could cope with more than one idea at a time.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Is she running on a Dem ticket or as an Independent? Not clear from that.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    No need to be offensive
    Sozza Big G - was meant to be a rhetorical flourish rather than an insult.
    Your first sentence was unnecessary. The rest was your held view and that is fair enough
    Yes well we can’t all write like Sean although I found his Sunday Times piece on the Seychelles this weekend surprisingly pedestrian.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,485
    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    So you think Brexit is a trade off between economics and other issues? It's a shame Brexit campaigners didn't make that case to the people but instead told us Brexit was the route to the economic sunlit uplands.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
    They have seen a hard Brexit disappear and a transistion agreement that once signed will ensure we leave the EU
    So Remainers are panicking because their nightmare scenario of hard Brexit has disappeared? That's a novel analysis of the psychology of desire. But, of course, hard Brexit hasn't disappeared: the EU can enforce it at any time during the transition period.
    If the idea that human beings are capable of wishing for otherwise disastrous outcomes for the pleasure of saying "I told you so" is novel to you, even after spending time reading this board, I suggest you steer clear of the topic of psychology.
    Please point out, for example, all those Tories on here longing for PM Jezza just so they gloat about crap the far Left is.
  • nielhnielh Posts: 1,307
    Not sure this is good news for the tories. Suggests a significant minority of their voters are not entirely behind "brexit at any cost".
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106

    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.

    The MeekBot.
  • kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    Anazina said:

    Is she running on a Dem ticket or as an Independent? Not clear from that.
    She's dyed blue, I can't see her standing as anything else:

    https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2018/02/04/cynthia-nixon-potential-cuomo-challenger-calls-for-better-democrats-to-run-in-2018-234728
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,489
    edited March 2018
    TGOHF said:

    "That Jimmy Saville - he ran the marathons on time.."

    Pope-ish does as Pope-ish is.

    Is why we need to stop Jacob Rees-Mogg becoming PM/Tory Leader.

    His Pope-ish ways scares me and his taking the Catholic Church’s whip.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,371
    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295
    GIN1138 said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    Eh? Who’s talking about the WTO?
    A lot of Remainers have been hoping for no deal/WTO in the belief that Parliament (or the voters via EU Ref 2) would call the whole thing off.
    I honestly can’t think of any. I think most of the Remainers on here have predicting some kind of fudge for a long time.

    So I’m going to put this down to yet more Brexit bullshit.
  • TGOHF said:

    "That Jimmy Saville - he ran the marathons on time.."

    Pope-ish does as Pope-ish is.

    Is why we need to stop Jacob Rees-Mogg becoming PM/Tory Leader.

    His Pope-ish ways scares me and his taking the Catholic Church’s whip.
    I like JRM for his honesty but leader, no
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295
    edited March 2018
    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh yes, I’ve done it myself.

    The difference is, I didn’t tell my wife we’d be making even *more* money and promise her an extra 350 a week on fruit and flowers.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    "That Jimmy Saville - he ran the marathons on time.."

    Pope-ish does as Pope-ish is.

    Is why we need to stop Jacob Rees-Mogg becoming PM/Tory Leader.

    His Pope-ish ways scares me and his taking the Catholic Church’s whip.
    Brexit means Moggxit...



  • Isabel Hardman is always one of my fave journalists to read on politics and this is excellent.

    https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/03/why-jeremy-corbyns-hat-matters/
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    One by one the last few remainer straws are slipping through their Quisling fingers.

    Their anguish is a joy to behold.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    kyf_100 said:


    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.
  • nielhnielh Posts: 1,307

    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh yes, I’ve done it myself.

    The difference is, I didn’t tell my wife we’d be making even *more* money and promise her an extra 350 a week on fruit and flowers.
    Your perspective is likely to be tied in to how much money you have at the moment. If it is either lots or none, then the economy potentially going down is less of an issue than if you are somewhere in the middle of the two extremes.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,152

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.

    This is probably pointless, but I'll tell you an anecdote from last year's general election.

    On the Saturday night before last year's election, my dad got talking to an oldish gentleman at the pub. He said that he was voting Labour for the first time in his life. Why? So that his grandchildren wouldn't have to pay tuition fees (I know, FPTP, safe Tory seat, etc.).

    The point is, you should not assume that people vote purely for what's in their own personal best interest.
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal

    Theresa needs to get the fishermen to pipe down on this pronto - promise them £350 million a week, say we'll retake our waters with an armada, anything. Fishing and fishermen hold a huge romantic place in the British heart. If the the public get wind we've sold them down the swanny then it will make Theresa look like the ultimate saboteur and completely tarnish the Brexit brand.
    I know you are joking, but I’ve always wondered why fishing gets so much attention when it is such a tiny part of our GDP (about 0.3% I think)
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,371

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    tlg86 said:

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.

    This is probably pointless, but I'll tell you an anecdote from last year's general election.

    On the Saturday night before last year's election, my dad got talking to an oldish gentleman at the pub. He said that he was voting Labour for the first time in his life. Why? So that his grandchildren wouldn't have to pay tuition fees (I know, FPTP, safe Tory seat, etc.).

    The point is, you should not assume that people vote purely for what's in their own personal best interest.
    I don't. But the correlation between those who are prepared to see the economy crash and those who are already retired on index-linked pensions is very noticeable.

    They're able to afford their prejudices, or think they can.
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    The fact that we have just agreed to a deal that gives us less control of our laws and borders than we currently get as EU members suggests the economy is more important than you claim
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,677

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal

    Theresa needs to get the fishermen to pipe down on this pronto - promise them £350 million a week, say we'll retake our waters with an armada, anything. Fishing and fishermen hold a huge romantic place in the British heart. If the the public get wind we've sold them down the swanny then it will make Theresa look like the ultimate saboteur and completely tarnish the Brexit brand.
    I know you are joking, but I’ve always wondered why fishing gets so much attention when it is such a tiny part of our GDP (about 0.3% I think)
    I once pointed out that statistic to an elderly leave-voting relative. His response was that fishing only accounted for such a small percentage of GDP because the EU had stuffed us. Unfettered by the EU, the fishing industry would rival services and finance as a source of national income.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
    Hehe.
    Put Tyndall down in the sell-out box.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,152

    tlg86 said:

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.

    This is probably pointless, but I'll tell you an anecdote from last year's general election.

    On the Saturday night before last year's election, my dad got talking to an oldish gentleman at the pub. He said that he was voting Labour for the first time in his life. Why? So that his grandchildren wouldn't have to pay tuition fees (I know, FPTP, safe Tory seat, etc.).

    The point is, you should not assume that people vote purely for what's in their own personal best interest.
    I don't. But the correlation between those who are prepared to see the economy crash and those who are already retired on index-linked pensions is very noticeable.

    They're able to afford their prejudices, or think they can.
    Do you think the youth in Scotland should be resentful towards the older voters who kept them in the Union?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837

    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
    I know we all try to do it but have you ignored every single one of @HYUFD’s posts?
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    Also, in amusing news Plato’s twitter account appears to have been banned. PB setting the trend as ever...
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal

    Theresa needs to get the fishermen to pipe down on this pronto - promise them £350 million a week, say we'll retake our waters with an armada, anything. Fishing and fishermen hold a huge romantic place in the British heart. If the the public get wind we've sold them down the swanny then it will make Theresa look like the ultimate saboteur and completely tarnish the Brexit brand.
    I know you are joking, but I’ve always wondered why fishing gets so much attention when it is such a tiny part of our GDP (about 0.3% I think)
    I once pointed out that statistic to an elderly leave-voting relative. His response was that fishing only accounted for such a small percentage of GDP because the EU had stuffed us. Unfettered by the EU, the fishing industry would rival services and finance as a source of national income.
    You can make a lot of money from fishing. Iceland and Norway do, though with much smaller populations of course. Fishing ought to be a bigger industry, especially given the relative poverty of the East Coast.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,259

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Tory MPs angry about fishing compromise set to (please let's call them the fisher people) meet Chief Whip this afternoon, and then PM tomorrow about transition deal

    Theresa needs to get the fishermen to pipe down on this pronto - promise them £350 million a week, say we'll retake our waters with an armada, anything. Fishing and fishermen hold a huge romantic place in the British heart. If the the public get wind we've sold them down the swanny then it will make Theresa look like the ultimate saboteur and completely tarnish the Brexit brand.
    I know you are joking, but I’ve always wondered why fishing gets so much attention when it is such a tiny part of our GDP (about 0.3% I think)
    I wonder if a delay on fisheries might have been traded for Gibraltar, actually. Although I have no evidence for that.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,906



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    Ishmael_Z said:

    Full on remainer panic at present

    Why would they be panicking?
    They have seen a hard Brexit disappear and a transistion agreement that once signed will ensure we leave the EU
    So Remainers are panicking because their nightmare scenario of hard Brexit has disappeared? That's a novel analysis of the psychology of desire. But, of course, hard Brexit hasn't disappeared: the EU can enforce it at any time during the transition period.
    If the idea that human beings are capable of wishing for otherwise disastrous outcomes for the pleasure of saying "I told you so" is novel to you, even after spending time reading this board, I suggest you steer clear of the topic of psychology.
    Please point out, for example, all those Tories on here longing for PM Jezza just so they gloat about crap the far Left is.
    I said some people think like that about some things, not everyone thinks like that about everything. The mindset is characteristic of the sulker (cf Achilles in his tent) and Tories qua Tories don't sulk on here in quite the way that some Remainers do. And actually your question is more complicated than that anyway, because there is a reasonable view that a short and disastrous Corbyn caliphate would be in the long term interest of the Tories and the country anyway.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,489
    edited March 2018
    I thought it was only Remainers who were unhappy with this transition deal.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianAnushka/status/975805174190104576
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,906

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,259
    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    You need to look up what "ad hominem" is.

    Once you've done that, you might look up "irony", given you just called me a fascist.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,371

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
    Hehe.
    Put Tyndall down in the sell-out box.
    Showing your ignorance yet again. I argued for a Norway Brexit on here long before we ever voted. I even wrote articles about it. I am very content with progress at the moment.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    I thought it was only Remainers who were unhappy with this transition deal.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianAnushka/status/975805174190104576

    Oh thank God.

    We have had Remainers make Jacob's arguments for him, now we can finally have the man himself.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    Anazina said:

    Is she running on a Dem ticket or as an Independent? Not clear from that.
    She's dyed blue, I can't see her standing as anything else:

    https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2018/02/04/cynthia-nixon-potential-cuomo-challenger-calls-for-better-democrats-to-run-in-2018-234728
    She doesn't have a hope. Cuomo is popular, and runs a machine that will ride right over her. Mind you, if she commits to cancelling Cuomo's naming of the replacement Tappan Zee Bridge after his father, she should do very well around here!
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    I thought it was only Remainers who were unhappy with this transition deal.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianAnushka/status/975805174190104576

    I thought he was on board?
    Indeed, keeping the Brexit-loons side was, I thought, the notable achievement today.

    I feel like there’s been a bit of a wake up and smell the covfefe moment for the loons who are suddenly remembering their principles.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837
    edited March 2018

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
    Hehe.
    Put Tyndall down in the sell-out box.
    Showing your ignorance yet again. I argued for a Norway Brexit on here long before we ever voted. I even wrote articles about it. I am very content with progress at the moment.
    You utter bastard, selling out the majority of those who fell for Leave’s simplistic argument about immigration.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
    Hehe.
    Put Tyndall down in the sell-out box.
    Showing your ignorance yet again. I argued for a Norway Brexit on here long before we ever voted. I even wrote articles about it. I am very content with progress at the moment.
    I know. And undoubtedly in those articles you disputed the idea of Norway as a fax democracy, citing various protections in EFTA.

    Protections we ain’t getting, at least for 18 months.
  • TOPPING said:

    kyf_100 said:

    On topic, there's something weirdly impressive that half of Conservative voters are entirely up for threatening British jobs and living standards. I expect most of them would be willing to accuse non-believers in Brexit of being traitors and saboteurs.

    Nothing odd or impressive about it. That's what voters decided, having been very fully warned that their decision would have a deleterious effect on the economy. I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion that they were mistaken should override their decision, especially since the only relevant new piece of information is that the economic damage is so far less than feared.
    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.
    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
    I know we all try to do it but have you ignored every single one of @HYUFD’s posts?
    Not sure of the connection. I do not ignore any of Hyufd's posts but I do not always agree with them
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    You need to look up what "ad hominem" is.

    Once you've done that, you might look up "irony", given you just called me a fascist.
    My typology of Brexit on the previous thread may also be helpful.
  • kyf_100 said:


    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.
    I do not expect many job loses - we will still trade with the EU and beyond
  • Chris_AChris_A Posts: 1,237
    edited March 2018
    I thought that natural selection was supposed to improve the gene pool? In our case it's produced a nation where half are congenital idiots.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
    If the people elect a Labour government, I won’t throw a tantrum when told to pay higher taxes, even though I’m opposed to them. That’s what living in a democratic nation state means.

    You have quite the entitlement mentality.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    kyf_100 said:


    There is more to life than money. As anybody who has ever left a crappy but highly paid job for a less stressful one can attest to.

    Time and time again remainers make the mistake of arguing that the economy is the only valid argument, when all the evidence points to most people having a more nuanced view. Many evidently consider it a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws. That remainers still don't get this after going all-in on the economic argument two years ago beggars belief.

    Oh I get that many (elderly retired) Leavers would rather see the economy crash than have to deal with foreigners.

    It's a shame that Leavers have to drag Remain voters who don't share their values down with them.
    I am a remain voter but now want to leave but frankly your constant reference to foreigners is not my view post Brexit when I hope we will welcome people from across the world to live and work and contribute to our economy, but importantly we will have control on unrestricted immigration
    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.
    I do not expect many job loses - we will still trade with the EU and beyond
    Nicely sidestepped Big_G.
  • I thought it was only Remainers who were unhappy with this transition deal.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianAnushka/status/975805174190104576

    Oh thank God.

    We have had Remainers make Jacob's arguments for him, now we can finally have the man himself.
    Well it confirms that this is a deal I can live with, whilst it isn't what I was after, and I have huge concerns about Northern Ireland, if the Moggster ain't happy, then Mrs May has done good.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,485
    edited March 2018

    TOPPING said:

    Anazina said:

    Full on remainer panic at present


    Er what?
    Every remainer post is attacking the transistion deal that ends their argument of a disastrous no deal and WTO and ensures we have left by 1st January 2021
    No it’s not you dipstick. Some of us are pointing out the futility of the whole exercise to get us back to a gnat’s bollock of where we started and wonder at a process that can leave us with less democracy than before.
    Except of course it won't. No matter how much you might wish it to be the case.
    Already has. We’re signing up to it.
    And we’ll sign up to a “full fettle Brexit” after that.
    Only in your addled brain. Out in the real world it is an entirely different matter
    Hehe.
    Put Tyndall down in the sell-out box.
    Showing your ignorance yet again. I argued for a Norway Brexit on here long before we ever voted. I even wrote articles about it. I am very content with progress at the moment.
    And in your fantasy Norway Brexit, what's your politically acceptable solution for the Irish border, or your logistically acceptable solution for the channel tunnel?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    RoyalBlue said:



    If the people elect a Labour government, I won’t throw a tantrum when told to pay higher taxes, even though I’m opposed to them. That’s what living in a democratic nation state means.

    You have quite the entitlement mentality.

    You think that Remain supporters are supposed to cheer to the rafters if they lose their jobs because of Brexit because of the referendum result? Get real.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
    As are you.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,837
    RoyalBlue said:

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
    If the people elect a Labour government, I won’t throw a tantrum when told to pay higher taxes, even though I’m opposed to them. That’s what living in a democratic nation state means.

    You have quite the entitlement mentality.
    If the people elected a Labour government and you argued against that government would you be happy to be called a quisling?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,363

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
    you were quite happy to do so when the shoe was on the other foot

    we should ask you to give more

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,259
    RoyalBlue said:

    kyf_100 said:

    kyf_100 said:



    Imagine a Remain supporter. He works in a job that is directly affected by Brexit. He has no interest in the chauvinist delusions displayed by so many Leave supporters. He loses his job. And then he reads on the internet that some numpty thinks that "it's a worthy trade off to have more control over our borders and a direct say in those who make our laws". His reaction would be unprintable.

    It's all very well Leavers being prepared to make sacrifices for their mad hobbyhorse. But they should not be asking others to make them on their behalves.

    Belief in democracy now makes me a "numpty". Charming.

    I can only assume that your desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority in either your own personal interest or for what you perceive as "the greater good" makes you a fascist.
    I don't desire to ride roughshod over the views of the majority. I defer to it.

    That doesn't make me like a victory won through xenophobic lies any the more though, and self-deluding tosh about Britain not currently being a democracy does indeed mark you out as a numpty.

    You still haven't answered the point about asking others who don't believe in your mania to make sacrifices for a cause they don't subscribe to.
    You're a very rude and unpleasant man and I don't feel inclined to respond to ad hominems.
    I wouldn’t rise to it.
    So you too are relaxed about asking others who bitterly oppose your mad hobbyhorse to make sacrifices so you can enjoy it?
    If the people elect a Labour government, I won’t throw a tantrum when told to pay higher taxes, even though I’m opposed to them. That’s what living in a democratic nation state means.

    You have quite the entitlement mentality.
    Ignore him. He feeds off responses to his provocations.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,363

    I thought it was only Remainers who were unhappy with this transition deal.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianAnushka/status/975805174190104576

    Oh thank God.

    We have had Remainers make Jacob's arguments for him, now we can finally have the man himself.
    Well it confirms that this is a deal I can live with, whilst it isn't what I was after, and I have huge concerns about Northern Ireland, if the Moggster ain't happy, then Mrs May has done good.
    this would be the same NI you wanted to ditch for a tax cut ?

    chortle
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,295
    In all fairness, the elderly and ill-educated should be taxed to pay for the costs of Brexit.

    The benefit of course is that they’ll be too slow or stupid to see it coming! :)
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    In all fairness, the elderly and ill-educated should be taxed to pay for the costs of Brexit.

    The benefit of course is that they’ll be too slow or stupid to see it coming! :)

    I had this covered in August 2016. Remove the triple lock and cancel the roll-out of rural broadband:

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/08/05/alastair-meeks-argues-that-any-cuts-or-tax-rises-caused-by-brexit-be-borne-primarily-by-those-groups-that-voted-leave/
This discussion has been closed.