politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Theresa May’s new government, we’re nearly there

Priti Patel is the latest to join Theresa May's new Cabinet #CabinetReshuffle https://t.co/rGGeixOKbo pic.twitter.com/qoWpgO8E3E
Comments
-
First like Owen Smith?0
-
Tour de France more of a farce than the labour leadership battle...0
-
Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history0
-
Farcical scenes at the Tour de France:
twitter.com/SimonNRicketts/status/7536063464408637450 -
Where are we with regards to the maximum size of the Cabinet?
With 2 new departments and only 1 being abolished, surely that limit has been exceeded...0 -
May has really surprised me - a massive recasting of government and a massive power shift away from the Cameroons. Surely they can't be happy?0
-
It feels like there is a lot less star power in this Cabinet compared to the last one. Getting rid of the Cameroons in totality may be short sighted with such a small majority to defend. Some may seek to leave the house, and in 2020 it will make the gains against the Lib Dems tough to defend.0
-
Mr. Pioneers, must say, she's perhaps taking a risk. Wrote on the previous thread that even Alexander was wary of incurring Parmenio's wrath.0
-
Ooh, Karen Bradley is a fellow mathematics almunus from Imperial College. Good to see some actual maths skills in the government.0
-
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est0 -
One based more on talent than parents wallets?TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
0 -
But I get the impression that the Froome disaster wasn't self administered.FrancisUrquhart said:Tour de France more of a farce than the labour leadership battle...
Unlike Labour (so far).0 -
Johnson, Rudd, Fallon, Hunt and Evans the privately educated members.0
-
May ties with Macmillan for sackings.0
-
That would be a shame. I mean they've been so effective in Government haven't they?MaxPB said:It feels like there is a lot less star power in this Cabinet compared to the last one. Getting rid of the Cameroons in totality may be short sighted with such a small majority to defend. Some may seek to leave the house, and in 2020 it will make the gains against the Lib Dems tough to defend.
0 -
https://twitter.com/cycling_podcast/status/753610361304145920Toms said:
But I get the impression that the Froome disaster wasn't self administered.FrancisUrquhart said:Tour de France more of a farce than the labour leadership battle...
Unlike Labour (so far).
Arf0 -
Patrick McLoughlin’s rise from coal pits to party chairman is the stuff of books.0
-
isn't sine followed by the ablative not accusative?Alanbrooke said:
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est0 -
Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Who is Greg Clark ? Never heard of him.
Almost zero Nat fightback to May putting them back in their box last night - the Indy dream is dead for 30-40 years IMHO.
0 -
I wonder what Cameron's reshuffle would have looked like if the referendum had tilted the other way. Not much like this, I'd guess!0
-
Scotland? If it's not Mundell, it's going to be interesting. Apart from nice offices, I believe, it isn't the most rewarding job. Mundell is a nice enough man, but you suspect he is happier checking in on his constituency and turning up to vote rather than be responsible for other people's policies.0
-
They have no idea do they - we are going outAndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
The summer of the sharp stilettos.John_M said:May ties with Macmillan for sackings.
0 -
you are in all likelihood correct, but TSE doesnt know that :-)JohnO said:
isn't sine followed by the ablative not accusative?Alanbrooke said:
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est0 -
No fightback because they know just how bad the figures in their next indy white paper would have to look just like everyone else does.TGOHF said:Who is Greg Clark ? Never heard of him.
Almost zero Nat fightback to May putting them back in their box last night - the Indy dream is dead for 30-40 years IMHO.
They want to make a fuss about brexit, but they don't actually want indyref2, they have no idea even how to start planning for it.0 -
FPT:
Right now I don't think I can really be a part of the Labour party. It's for Corbynites only these days, sadly.Sunil_Prasannan said:
"You Tories"The_Apocalypse said:
Some of you Tories are a bit weird to say the least.MP_SE said:I wish Priti got Chief Whip.
@GIN1138 Has there ever been a match up of two more unlikeable people?
@numbertwelve Yeah, IDS could go there. I doubt he'll be Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
How about "you Labour"? You have a weird leadership problem0 -
I think we should have a General Election every month. I would prefer every week but we must give the people and politicians a rest.AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Are you going to eff off and join the Sheffield Hallam LibDems?TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
0 -
It's still 13/14 men and 8 women, by my count.
Ruth for the Scottish Office?!0 -
Biochemistry, 1997 for menot_on_fire said:Ooh, Karen Bradley is a fellow mathematics almunus from Imperial College. Good to see some actual maths skills in the government.
0 -
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Considering I've got a thread header for this weekend, delayed from last weekend, which includes 'delenda est' in the headline, I do know.Alanbrooke said:
you are in all likelihood correct, but TSE doesnt know that :-)JohnO said:
isn't sine followed by the ablative not accusative?Alanbrooke said:
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est
I might have to start channelling some Catullus 16 now0 -
Alanbrooke said:
you are in all likelihood correct, but TSE doesnt know that :-)JohnO said:
isn't sine followed by the ablative not accusative?Alanbrooke said:
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est0 -
-
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Some interesting choices and perhaps some questionable ones as well. She has the power and the right to choose who she wants and she is clearly stamping her authority in line with her vision for the future. Have to see how it plays out.
The Boris/Fox/Davis triumvirate for me has potential disaster written all over it. They will have to work together on some pats of the negotiations you would think and all three of them might have a different vision for a post UK brexit. On the one hand May might think Brexit is your mess deal with it and if any of those right wing backbenchers kick up a fuss she can just say well I gave your lot the power to sort it out. But on the other hand if it doesn't work out she could still take damage from it, people will question her judgement.
Apart from the Boris decision Hunt remaining in post is probably the most surprising to me. I've been largely supportive of Hunt during the industrial action with the Junior Doctors and now feel it's time to impose the contract. But May could have taken the easy option and delivered a fresh start in replacing him but didn't. I have no doubt the doctors will not take this decision well but they have their own political agenda and nothing may please them.
Osborne? He could come back at some point from this but he will have to want to remain an MP. I would imagine some financial institutions will be looking at his political future with interest. Maybe he will decide he is done with Politics.
Some really big beasts and talented people on the backbenches, I can't imagine Cameron/Osborne/Gove sitting together lol0 -
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Watching the TdF, what a nightmare - why no crowd barriers at the top of the stage? That minute Froome had to wait for his team must have felt like an hour.0
-
Is that it for the Cabinet then?0
-
Some nice pictures with Roof D then a few more wagging a finger at St Nick.RobD said:
Acording to the Telegraph May is off to Scotland tomorrowTGOHF said:Who is Greg Clark ? Never heard of him.
Almost zero Nat fightback to May putting them back in their box last night - the Indy dream is dead for 30-40 years IMHO.0 -
A response to the inane ramblings about us losing "EU Money". You REMAINERs only have yourselves to blame!IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Is it truly egalitarian if there are hardly any former public schoolboys and schoolgirls there? You'd think if it was truly egalitarian, based on merit that there would be some. Penalising people for their parents choices is not egalitarian.0
-
Imperial is a dump. It takes all riff-raff.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Biochemistry, 1997 for menot_on_fire said:Ooh, Karen Bradley is a fellow mathematics almunus from Imperial College. Good to see some actual maths skills in the government.
0 -
Four out of twenty, which is still way more than nationally.Philip_Thompson said:Is it truly egalitarian if there are hardly any former public schoolboys and schoolgirls there? You'd think if it was truly egalitarian, based on merit that there would be some. Penalising people for their parents choices is not egalitarian.
0 -
Normally reshuffles are a five dimensional puzzle to not upset the incumbents, reward the loyal, encourage those that haven't had preferment and refresh the line up while staying within the fixed number of posts. Even when moving from opposition ministers mostly take the posts they have been shadowing.Richard_Nabavi said:I wonder what Cameron's reshuffle would have looked like if the referendum had tilted the other way. Not much like this, I'd guess!
0 -
Scotland & Leader of the house of commonsGIN1138 said:Is that it for the Cabinet then?
0 -
No, that's Oxford! (Hat-tip to General Melchett!).Jonathan said:
Imperial is a dump. It takes all riff-raff.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Biochemistry, 1997 for menot_on_fire said:Ooh, Karen Bradley is a fellow mathematics almunus from Imperial College. Good to see some actual maths skills in the government.
0 -
Where in the post does it day "EU money" ?Sunil_Prasannan said:Repeat after me:
"There is no such thing as "EU Money". There is only taxpayers' money!"
It says subsidy, which is the key point...0 -
@jameskirkup: Foreigners get Boris. Farmers get Leadsom. Dfid gets Priti. Doctors keep Hunt. Top trolling from Theresa May. #banter0
-
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
We are net contributors the EU, remember? To the tune of £8.5 billion in 2015.Scott_P said:
Where in the post does it say "EU money" ?Sunil_Prasannan said:Repeat after me:
"There is no such thing as "EU Money". There is only taxpayers' money!"
It says subsidy, which is the key point...
0 -
Justice (ha, ha) would mean the always steady, invariably reliable and comprehensive boy David Gauke would become Chief Secretary.0
-
For top grades educationally, I don't think so.JohnO said:
Four out of twenty, which is still way more than nationally.Philip_Thompson said:Is it truly egalitarian if there are hardly any former public schoolboys and schoolgirls there? You'd think if it was truly egalitarian, based on merit that there would be some. Penalising people for their parents choices is not egalitarian.
Based solely on pop, about twice what it should be.0 -
The UK has subsidised its farmers since the year dot. People should try cracking open a history book every now and then.Scott_P said:
Where in the post does it day "EU money" ?Sunil_Prasannan said:Repeat after me:
"There is no such thing as "EU Money". There is only taxpayers' money!"
It says subsidy, which is the key point...0 -
curTheScreamingEagles said:
Considering I've got a thread header for this weekend, delayed from last weekend, which includes 'delenda est' in the headline, I do know.Alanbrooke said:
you are in all likelihood correct, but TSE doesnt know that :-)JohnO said:
isn't sine followed by the ablative not accusative?Alanbrooke said:
Hurrah !TheScreamingEagles said:Took all my restraint to not describe this as the most pleb government in history
Res publica pleborum
vox populi audiendum est
sine Borisem Etonia delenda est
I might have to start channelling some Catullus 16 now0 -
The AV referendum was binding, this one was not. They parliament did vote to hold a referendum though, so would be stupid to ignore it.Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Also not what the post said or was about. Keep digging.Sunil_Prasannan said:We are net contributors the EU, remember? To the tune of £8.5 billion in 2015.
0 -
I voted Remain.
But if there is a second referendum, I will vote leave. I will not be a part of "asking the other parent"0 -
Were farmers and fishermen not the trade most likely to have voted Leave? Apart from the big agri-businesses with full time administrators, farmers all hate the CAP with a passion.John_M said:0 -
That would be sensible.Is it constitutional and can you be in the cabinet if you are not a member of (the Westminster) parliament?TheWhiteRabbit said:It's still 13/14 men and 8 women, by my count.
Ruth for the Scottish Office?!0 -
A 150 year old Scottish Lord with a legendary ARSE waiting for "the call" to serve?TheWhiteRabbit said:
0 -
This would be a cherry on top...
@jessphillips: Id put a fiver on Anna Soubry or Therese Coffey for Leader of the house0 -
Err, no, we Remainers have you to blame. As you'll most probably find out.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A response to the inane ramblings about us losing "EU Money". You REMAINERs only have yourselves to blame!IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Just as soon as the Europhile morons stop talking about 'EU money'.IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Not clear. However if Her Majesty appoints, I see no reason why not.FF43 said:
That would be sensible.Is it constitutional and can you be in the cabinet if you are not a member of (the Westminster) parliament?TheWhiteRabbit said:It's still 13/14 men and 8 women, by my count.
Ruth for the Scottish Office?!0 -
Act was passed last year:Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Referendum_Act_20150 -
Scott has never heard of the Corn Laws.John_M said:
The UK has subsidised its farmers since the year dot. People should try cracking open a history book every now and then.Scott_P said:
Where in the post does it day "EU money" ?Sunil_Prasannan said:Repeat after me:
"There is no such thing as "EU Money". There is only taxpayers' money!"
It says subsidy, which is the key point...0 -
David Mundell remains Secretary of State for Scotland in @theresa_may's new cabinet0
-
I don't think they will have to work particularly closely together on the negotiations. The structure appears to indicate that Boris won't be much involved with the Brexit negotiations at all, that will be DD's responsibility. Meanwhile Fox will be trying to set up deals with the US, China, and other far-off lands. I can see some potential problems of overlap in the Fox/Boris responsibilities, but the EU negotiations seem to be squarely DD's problem. I hope he's up to it, I have my doubts on that.jonny83 said:...
The Boris/Fox/Davis triumvirate for me has potential disaster written all over it. They will have to work together on some pats of the negotiations you would think and all three of them might have a different vision for a post UK brexit. ...0 -
The referendum was authorised by the EU Referendum Act 2015, passed by Parliament last year.Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Referendum_Act_20150 -
At least Letwind won't be in charge of implementing Brexit.Luckyguy1983 said:
That would be a shame. I mean they've been so effective in Government haven't they?MaxPB said:It feels like there is a lot less star power in this Cabinet compared to the last one. Getting rid of the Cameroons in totality may be short sighted with such a small majority to defend. Some may seek to leave the house, and in 2020 it will make the gains against the Lib Dems tough to defend.
0 -
Give Davidson a peerage!TheWhiteRabbit said:
Not clear. However if Her Majesty appoints, I see no reason why not.FF43 said:
That would be sensible.Is it constitutional and can you be in the cabinet if you are not a member of (the Westminster) parliament?TheWhiteRabbit said:It's still 13/14 men and 8 women, by my count.
Ruth for the Scottish Office?!0 -
So this referendum was advisory only?RobD said:
The AV referendum was binding, this one was not. They parliament did vote to hold a referendum though, so would be stupid to ignore it.Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
There was no mention of "EU money", except by Sunil...Richard_Tyndall said:Just as soon as the Europhile morons stop talking about 'EU money'.
0 -
Roof D in the cabinet as an MSP ?TheWhiteRabbit said:
Scotland & Leader of the house of commonsGIN1138 said:Is that it for the Cabinet then?
0 -
It's hard to be nuanced even on here, never mind Twitter.Sandpit said:
Were farmers and fishermen not the trade most likely to have voted Leave? Apart from the big agri-businesses with full time administrators, farmers all hate the CAP with a passion.John_M said:
Round here, the small farmers (mainly hill farms) are likely to be happy. The bigger agri-businesses will be quaking in their boots. As a rule of thumb, MNCs and large businesses like the EU. At some arbitrary point (which varies by sector) smaller businesses don't.0 -
[sigh] I was referring to the "repeated inanity"!IanB2 said:
Err, no, we Remainers have you to blame. As you'll most probably find out.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A response to the inane ramblings about us losing "EU Money". You REMAINERs only have yourselves to blame!IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Yes. But that won't change the fact we'll be leaving.Toms said:
So this referendum was advisory only?RobD said:
The AV referendum was binding, this one was not. They parliament did vote to hold a referendum though, so would be stupid to ignore it.Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z0 -
Overheard in pub earlier.
"The problem we've got is too many foreigners but now Boris is Foreign Secretary he'll take 'em all back with him."
You've got to love the general public.0 -
-
Posting the same trite sentence over and over is really just you spamming this site. Particularly as it was neither humorous nor insightful to begin with.Sunil_Prasannan said:
[sigh] I was referring to the "repeated inanity"!IanB2 said:
Err, no, we Remainers have you to blame. As you'll most probably find out.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A response to the inane ramblings about us losing "EU Money". You REMAINERs only have yourselves to blame!IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:0 -
Yes a good summary. It really does seem to be a case of making people see out the consequences of their decisions (Hunt, The Terrible Trio) which I'm not sure is the best way of optimising the outcome.jonny83 said:Some interesting choices and perhaps some questionable ones as well. She has the power and the right to choose who she wants and she is clearly stamping her authority in line with her vision for the future. Have to see how it plays out.
The Boris/Fox/Davis triumvirate for me has potential disaster written all over it. They will have to work together on some pats of the negotiations you would think and all three of them might have a different vision for a post UK brexit. On the one hand May might think Brexit is your mess deal with it and if any of those right wing backbenchers kick up a fuss she can just say well I gave your lot the power to sort it out. But on the other hand if it doesn't work out she could still take damage from it, people will question her judgement.
Apart from the Boris decision Hunt remaining in post is probably the most surprising to me. I've been largely supportive of Hunt during the industrial action with the Junior Doctors and now feel it's time to impose the contract. But May could have taken the easy option and delivered a fresh start in replacing him but didn't. I have no doubt the doctors will not take this decision well but they have their own political agenda and nothing may please them.
Osborne? He could come back at some point from this but he will have to want to remain an MP. I would imagine some financial institutions will be looking at his political future with interest. Maybe he will decide he is done with Politics.
Some really big beasts and talented people on the backbenches, I can't imagine Cameron/Osborne/Gove sitting together lol
I like Rudd as HS she is certainly an effective and capable operator, Fallon stays as attack dog, if you have an opportunity to detoxify Health why not take it? Greening deeply unimpressive at anything...
Politics for me just got a bit more boring as there seem to be a bunch of not-very-interestings now in power.
If this is supposed to be the safe pair of hands, getting on with the job, no flashiness cabinet then I suppose it's mission accomplished. I can't help thinking, however (and with no catiness), that this cabinet is unexceptional in brainpower and ability as well as character.
I will not be watching PM May's first PMQs that's for sure. Perhaps they should screen it at midnight, as a service to all the insomniacs.
0 -
Unless you are a farmer...Sunil_Prasannan said:So we won't be losing any money after all? Good.
0 -
-
All the farmers I spoke to feared Out because they didn't trust the UK govt to maintain or replicate the subsidies. Now, there is a different discussion to be had about the sense or otherwise of subsidies but dear god if I was a farmer now, knowing La Leaden Leadsom was at the controls of DEFRA, I might be scouring the planning and change of use laws very carefully...Scott_P said:
Unless you are a farmer...Sunil_Prasannan said:So we won't be losing any money after all? Good.
0 -
Truth hurts doesn't it?IanB2 said:
Posting the same trite sentence over and over is really just you spamming this site. Particularly as it was neither humorous nor insightful to begin with.Sunil_Prasannan said:
[sigh] I was referring to the "repeated inanity"!IanB2 said:
Err, no, we Remainers have you to blame. As you'll most probably find out.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A response to the inane ramblings about us losing "EU Money". You REMAINERs only have yourselves to blame!IanB2 said:
Give us a break from this repeated inanity!Sunil_Prasannan said:
BTW, Ian:
LEAVE 52%
REMAIN 48%
There!0 -
A French farmer possibly.Scott_P said:
Unless you are a farmer...Sunil_Prasannan said:So we won't be losing any money after all? Good.
Uk farmers will be better off as they will have a global marketplace.0 -
Thanks.RobD said:
Yes. But that won't change the fact we'll be leaving.Toms said:
So this referendum was advisory only?RobD said:
The AV referendum was binding, this one was not. They parliament did vote to hold a referendum though, so would be stupid to ignore it.Toms said:
Seriously, and please forgive my ignorance, but is not the Commons the only, final, arbiter in British law? Or did Parliament actually approve the referendum to start with? If it was Cameron's choice, or even that of the Tory party, then sod that.Pulpstar said:
Second brexitToms said:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215AndyJS said:Owen Smith calls for a second referendum because many voters "now regret their decision".
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/labour-candidate-vows-second-vote-on-brexit-n79bxds9z
I would have thought such a process should be more rigorous. Grist for the legal community here?
It's a pity, with much sympathy, that Mr. Meeks is hors de combat. His input would have been interesting.0 -
So we're not losing non-EU money by leaving the EU?Scott_P said:
Unless you are a farmer...Sunil_Prasannan said:So we won't be losing any money after all? Good.
0 -
If before all of this, someone had suggested that Boris/Fox/Davis were the dream team to lead any important negotiation it would have been considered a joke.Richard_Nabavi said:
I don't think they will have to work particularly closely together on the negotiations. The structure appears to indicate that Boris won't be much involved with the Brexit negotiations at all, that will be DD's responsibility. Meanwhile Fox will be trying to set up deals with the US, China, and other far-off lands. I can see some potential problems of overlap in the Fox/Boris responsibilities, but the EU negotiations seem to be squarely DD's problem. I hope he's up to it, I have my doubts on that.jonny83 said:...
The Boris/Fox/Davis triumvirate for me has potential disaster written all over it. They will have to work together on some pats of the negotiations you would think and all three of them might have a different vision for a post UK brexit. ...0 -
If Brexit turns out to be a disaster, May will own this, regardless of whether the mess was created by the 3 Brexiteers. She's in charge now. So she had better make it clear to them what vision of Brexit she has and make sure they do their best to get it. And the Merkels of this world are going to want to deal with the organ grinder, not the monkeys - whatever their titles.jonny83 said:Some interesting choices and perhaps some questionable ones as well. She has the power and the right to choose who she wants and she is clearly stamping her authority in line with her vision for the future. Have to see how it plays out.
The Boris/Fox/Davis triumvirate for me has potential disaster written all over it. They will have to work together on some pats of the negotiations you would think and all three of them might have a different vision for a post UK brexit. On the one hand May might think Brexit is your mess deal with it and if any of those right wing backbenchers kick up a fuss she can just say well I gave your lot the power to sort it out. But on the other hand if it doesn't work out she could still take damage from it, people will question her judgement.
[Snipped]
I think this is more about making sure that while the negotiations are going on the Brexiteers can't snipe at her and, if what is arrived at is not to the liking of some of them, of having the necessary cover.
What is more interesting to me is how Hammond will work them. He is the one who will want to ensure that any deal does not eff up the economy so badly. In the end if it does that will do for May and him and the Tories' chances at the next election. So he should want to make sure that he gets the right input into any deal. Whether he will or not is another matter.0 -
And again you are obsessed by "EU money" which is not what I was talking about, in any of the posts you have latched on to so far.Sunil_Prasannan said:So we're not losing non-EU money by leaving the EU?
Why do you keep wittering on about it?0 -
Well, at one point there was a suggestion that it might have been Andrea Leadsom, so, in comparison...Jonathan said:
If before all of this, someone had suggested that Boris/Fox/Davis were the dream team to lead any important negotiation it would have been considered a joke.0 -
Gauke Chief Secretary to the Treasury0