politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The CON race: A new poll, a May campaign denial and more fr

Survation survey of 1000+ CON councillors finds
May 46.2%
Leadsom 21.8
Gove 5.1
DK/Refused 22.8
0
This discussion has been closed.
Survation survey of 1000+ CON councillors finds
May 46.2%
Leadsom 21.8
Gove 5.1
DK/Refused 22.8
Comments
Good afternoon, everybody.
Third like LeadsomFourth like Crabb
(a) Being a bit of a playboy (well fine)
(b) His romantic history, and most problematically his sexuality.
And thus we got tweets like:
Owen Jones@OwenJones84
I don't have Chuka's politics (at all) But really hope he hasn't been forced to withdraw for anything we shouldn't give a toss about in 2015
Ben Bradshaw was also a high profile supporter.
Now I have seen no conclusive evidence of anything. Whatever the truth, Chuka did come across as deeply unhappy when fighting off accusations, which gave the distinct impression there were issues that need to be dealt with of one sort or another.
Brexit and Chilcot, painful and jarring as they are, will allow us to finally move on from the 1994-2016 era.
Hopefully, from the ruins, will emerge a new, vibrant, kinder (and hopefully far less cynical) politics.
If May in her first cabinet were to give Crabb the Education brief say, would it be a sideways move?
...
I'll get my coat
And then disappeared from public life.
She should cut out the jiggery pokery and face whoever those MPs who are unconvinced by her think she should face. She should have the easy beating of either of them.
a) make robots feel empathy
b) get them to ask questions rather than answer them
We have a long, long way to go before they catch up with human beings.
We don't need plaster saints running the country. I'm much more concerned with Leadsom's porkies than whether Chuka snorted something in his mis-spent youth*.
* For our OGH's sake, I'm not implying he did of course!
You know, become a bit of a hermit?
Good job he was clean on his expenses...
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/750688219264606208
I don't agree with all of Chukka's politics. But I recognised someone who was saleable and was advocating radical reform in 2015. I was very disappointed that he withdrew after 3 days - but for him now to demand leadership from others having (a) bottled it and (b) been awol ever since seems a bit rich. Even for someone as flamboyant as Chukka.
Their bargaining position is alot stronger post Brexit !
She's seen her country pull out of the EU (after her very subtle interventions on the behalf of the LEAVE campaign) and now her tenth (and one suspects least liked) Prime Minister is publicly shredded!
FIFY.
But quite. Those who moralise about such matters should ask themselves whether they would disqualify from a political career anyone who has ever broken the speed limit.
I asked the Dundonian bloke beside me what was up with the kid.
"Scott Crabbe's" he replied.
Simba has confirmed he will run for leadership of the Labour party. He didn't vote for the Iraq war and reckons his chances are "better than 50-50" against Eagle.
Odd how he hasn't had anything to say to the world on that war in Iraq.
Why? I'd hazard a guess that most MPs have broken the law at some stage in their lives.
As I understand it - via third-hand Chinese whispers from Streatham Labour people admittedly - there are some things that Chukka would like to keep from some of his older relatives who have rather less liberal views. Might be that he just doesn't want to cause them upset or shock, but could also be a legitimate fear of being disowned or disinherited?
Either way, it wouldn't surprise me at all if he made another bid for leader once said individuals have passed on and nobody bats an eyelid.
There were photos of Ozzy, but they didn't stop him being Chancellor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq
The point is regardless of the fact the Americans would have gone ahead anyway, a legal opinion that in international law a second resolution is needed does not change just because one was not forthcoming.
Another was the JIC Chairman. A year or so later he was actually promoted to Chief of MI5 despite it becoming clear by this time taht they had sold a pup.
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/186-indian-members-parliament-have-criminal-cases-including-murder-rape-600584
Surely not. Ths is the Labour Party that we are talking about.
One talks the pure unvarnished truth, but their delivery is stunted, stilted, poor.
The other talks utter crap, but in a rousing, excellent manner and gets everyone else to agree with them.
Who is right ?
Of the remaining 7 seats, Labour lead in 5 and the Coalition in 2. But, the leads are tiny, and the Coalition is gaining ground as postal votes are counted.
Actually, are we sure she was asleep. She may have closed her eyes so as to be better able to concentrate on what was being said - another habit of older people, I do it frequently at concerts, the theatre, on trains and so forth.
Is sixty too old to be PM nowadays?
Journalists have only had a few hours to read the report.
Good tactical move by Blair to have his press conference while he is at an advantage.
One more point: So many Labour MPs from the time and virtually the entire Tory party [ brave exceptions: Clarke, Heseltine etc. ] says today that they took the decisions they took given what was shown to them.
How come Robin Cook came to a different and correct decision ?
In his speech [ perhaps the greatest speech in Parliament in recent years ], he mentions absolutely clear that Iraq did not possess WMD as it was understood by most people.