Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

We are Getting too excited over Galloway – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 11,020
edited June 2021 in General
imageWe are Getting too excited over Galloway – politicalbetting.com

Batley and Spen might allow the Tories another rare and significant government by-election gain. But in the last few days attention has turned to the third party running: George Galloway’s Workers Party of Britain.

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    First?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    BigRich said:

    First?

    Like Labour in B&S ?
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    Scott_xP said:

    Sajid Javid is to push to scrap restrictions “asap” over fears of cost to families & economy

    He's set to make Commons statement tomo pm, after hospital visit am

    Quad met this eve to discuss July 5. Mood in advance among Govt sources was against changes

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/06/27/sajid-javid-push-end-lockdown-soon-possible/

    I think/hope he might what to show he is not Hancock 2.0 and therefor take a different attitude to the lockdown.

  • Options
    turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 15,185
    4th like galloway
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489

    BigRich said:

    First?

    Like Labour in B&S ?
    Well not like GG
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,216
    BigRich said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Sajid Javid is to push to scrap restrictions “asap” over fears of cost to families & economy

    He's set to make Commons statement tomo pm, after hospital visit am

    Quad met this eve to discuss July 5. Mood in advance among Govt sources was against changes

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/06/27/sajid-javid-push-end-lockdown-soon-possible/

    I think/hope he might what to show he is not Hancock 2.0 and therefor take a different attitude to the lockdown.

    Let's hope so. It is long past time when a more balanced approach is needed.
  • Options
    FishingFishing Posts: 4,561
    FPT:
    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    While I largely agree with the comments by Pip Moss, its possible that he has done less well since 2015 because Corbin was the lab leader and a big anti War and 'friend of Palestine' that's not the case now.

    Will it make a difference, probably only slightly.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    Is there any danger of a sympathy vote for Labour here?
    I mean, a well-known local woman being heckled, pursued and assaulted by roving groups of possibly non-local ne'er-do-wells?
    Just a thought.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,174
    Fishing said:

    FPT:

    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
    The irony is it is most likely intimidation from more extreme left wing brethren.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    Fishing said:

    FPT:

    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
    The irony is it is most likely intimidation from more extreme left wing brethren.
    Are there any tory activists to even intimidate?
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    BigRich said:

    While I largely agree with the comments by Pip Moss, its possible that he has done less well since 2015 because Corbin was the lab leader and a big anti War and 'friend of Palestine' that's not the case now.

    Will it make a difference, probably only slightly.

    Fair point: I didn't consider this angle and it might have some impact. I doubt enough to make Galloway come 2nd, but still worth considering.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,611

    Fishing said:

    FPT:

    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
    The irony is it is most likely intimidation from more extreme left wing brethren.
    From outsiders, I expect.

  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744
    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    The glory of a successful shot from a free kick is too much of a draw.
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    FPT
    Alistair said:

    FFS

    BREAKING: British No 1 Johanna Konta has been forced to withdraw from Wimbledon after going into self-isolation having been identified as a close contact of a person with coronavirus.

    Discussing the general situation with my wife and we are in agreement that it is now in a completely ridiculous situation.

    Cases are rocketing, the government are in no way taking societal level actions to suppress case numbers but we still have to self isolate after being a "close contact"

    It is a worst of all worlds situation. Either cases matter ro they don't. If they matter we must suppress, if they don't then fuck this self isolation nonsense.

    With Edinburgh case numbers now dwarfing January what chance my daughters summer holiday activities going ahead uninterrupted/at all? Close to zero.
    This is a key point. If it is official Government policy to largely disregard case numbers, then they need to do a lot better job of communicating this to the general public (and even, dare i say it, review their current testing policy which is almost designed to maximise case numbers).

    Because i suspect that headline numbers are still what most people look at, and there is much less focus/knowledge of hospitalisation numbers (and perhaps deaths). Because throughout the pandemic people have become trained to the idea that the latter are lagging factors, and will dismiss low numbers for them unless given good reasons not to do so.

    There is a big political danger if the Government lifts all restrictions on July 19th with case numbers still sky rocketing (there is the possibility, perhaps even probability by then that they will be on the turn, but that's not guaranteed) and it gets portrayed by sections of the media that this is just abandoning the health of the public to save money, end furlough etc.

    But have they got the communicators for that, and are they even trying?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    The glory of a successful shot from a free kick is too much of a draw.
    It used to be like that with the long range shot, but it is slowly been "analysed" out of the game. Like free kicks, your probability of scoring is so low, especially at the highest levels were the keepers are so good.
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489

    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).

    I expect, but don't know, that the Torys are running a higly targeted campaign, delving, phoning and door knocking on people they think are pro-Brexit, and letting Labour and GG have an undignified fight without getting there hands too dirty.

    Borris did visit I think a week ago, which I dont think he would do if he did not think there was a good shot of wining.

    HYDF (Or something like that) often gets involved in Tory campaigning, and updates us but I haven't seen him on here for a few days,
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,174

    Fishing said:

    FPT:

    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
    The irony is it is most likely intimidation from more extreme left wing brethren.
    Are there any tory activists to even intimidate?
    Don't be silly, but my point demonstrates, as I have said for many years, that the enemy as far as Momentum types are concerned are mainstream Labour supporters and not the Conservatives.

    After all their efforts keep returning Conservative Governments.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    BigRich said:

    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).

    I expect, but don't know, that the Torys are running a higly targeted campaign, delving, phoning and door knocking on people they think are pro-Brexit, and letting Labour and GG have an undignified fight without getting there hands too dirty.

    Borris did visit I think a week ago, which I dont think he would do if he did not think there was a good shot of wining.

    HYDF (Or something like that) often gets involved in Tory campaigning, and updates us but I haven't seen him on here for a few days,
    Yeah. Me neither. Probably wedding preparations.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,860

    Fishing said:

    FPT:

    Floater said:

    https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1409240242603892739

    "I’ve heard from friends campaigning in Batley that Labour activists are being actively intimidated and have even had eggs thrown at them."

    It's somewhat of a double-take that Labour activists, rather than Tories, are being intimidated and abused.

    Either way, it is of course unacceptable.
    The irony is it is most likely intimidation from more extreme left wing brethren.
    What evidence do you have of that?

    Only intimidation i saw was in the Joe 7 min piece.

    That was from a right wing person

    Do you have a particular incident in mind?

    I thought Kim would be a decent candidate but she looks very inexperienced.

    Hope she wins and Hancock has surely made that a possibility
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    edited June 2021
    dixiedean said:

    BigRich said:

    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).

    I expect, but don't know, that the Torys are running a higly targeted campaign, delving, phoning and door knocking on people they think are pro-Brexit, and letting Labour and GG have an undignified fight without getting there hands too dirty.

    Borris did visit I think a week ago, which I dont think he would do if he did not think there was a good shot of wining.

    HYDF (Or something like that) often gets involved in Tory campaigning, and updates us but I haven't seen him on here for a few days,
    Yeah. Me neither. Probably wedding preparations.
    He was here earlier with some brief comments on French elections. An area on which he famously launched his PB career.
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,076
    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    The glory of a successful shot from a free kick is too much of a draw.
    Players are putting their own vanity above the interests of the team.

    Yet they're never called out on it.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,174
    BigRich said:

    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).

    I expect, but don't know, that the Torys are running a higly targeted campaign, delving, phoning and door knocking on people they think are pro-Brexit, and letting Labour and GG have an undignified fight without getting there hands too dirty.

    Borris did visit I think a week ago, which I dont think he would do if he did not think there was a good shot of wining.

    HYDF (Or something like that) often gets involved in Tory campaigning, and updates us but I haven't seen him on here for a few days,
    HYUFD, and he is a PB hero (except when he cites Trafalgar voodoo polling as gospel).
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,334
    Not sure the egg-throwing rumour is true - I've talked with four ex-MPs (male and female) who have been canvassing in the Muslim ward, and they've not had any trouble. They say there are lots of Galloway posters there, but a lot of quiet Labour support too (and presumably some Tories, though they're invisible).

    I agree with Quincel, and have bet a fair sum in the same way. I think it's possible but unlikely that Labour will win, but I'm convinced we're well ahead of Galloway.

    Speaking of invisibility, the Tory campaign approach is interesting - so low-key that it has to be a deliberate strategy, with the candidate declining to talk to reporters. They presumably rely on their GOTV operation to get their vote out while Galloway gnaws at Labour. But there's a risk that the anti-Galloway vote (which definitely exists) will coalesce around Kim including some Tories - I talked to two Tory couples who were voting for her.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    The glory of a successful shot from a free kick is too much of a draw.
    It used to be like that with the long range shot, but it is slowly been "analysed" out of the game. Like free kicks, your probability of scoring is so low, especially at the highest levels were the keepers are so good.
    I guess the lighter ball and new shooting techniques which evolved from them, led to an absolute rash of direct free kick goals round the turn of the millennium.
    But goalies, analysis and walls have caught up with that.
    Football is really conservative, isn't it?
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    alex_ said:

    FPT

    Alistair said:

    FFS

    BREAKING: British No 1 Johanna Konta has been forced to withdraw from Wimbledon after going into self-isolation having been identified as a close contact of a person with coronavirus.

    Discussing the general situation with my wife and we are in agreement that it is now in a completely ridiculous situation.

    Cases are rocketing, the government are in no way taking societal level actions to suppress case numbers but we still have to self isolate after being a "close contact"

    It is a worst of all worlds situation. Either cases matter ro they don't. If they matter we must suppress, if they don't then fuck this self isolation nonsense.

    With Edinburgh case numbers now dwarfing January what chance my daughters summer holiday activities going ahead uninterrupted/at all? Close to zero.
    This is a key point. If it is official Government policy to largely disregard case numbers, then they need to do a lot better job of communicating this to the general public (and even, dare i say it, review their current testing policy which is almost designed to maximise case numbers).

    Because i suspect that headline numbers are still what most people look at, and there is much less focus/knowledge of hospitalisation numbers (and perhaps deaths). Because throughout the pandemic people have become trained to the idea that the latter are lagging factors, and will dismiss low numbers for them unless given good reasons not to do so.

    There is a big political danger if the Government lifts all restrictions on July 19th with case numbers still sky rocketing (there is the possibility, perhaps even probability by then that they will be on the turn, but that's not guaranteed) and it gets portrayed by sections of the media that this is just abandoning the health of the public to save money, end furlough etc.

    But have they got the communicators for that, and are they even trying?
    I think that's very accurate,

    I also think:

    1) That after the last few days news, there will be some maybe a lot of people who say 'sod it' minister is ignoring the rules/guidance then so will I. and this may push up cases.

    2) That changing the rules will not make that big a difference, not that many people go to night clubs, masks don't do that much, there is not that much spread at outdoor events like football. overall some but not a massive effect.


    but politically if 1, leads to a rise and it is blamed on the government allowing 2, then that might look bad. and this government does not like looking bad, even if it is the right thing to do,
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    Wonder if UEFA will end up pulling the Euro semis and finals from Wembley - not because we won't allow the 2,500 dignataries and sponsors in without quarantine, but because their home countries won't allow them back!
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489

    BigRich said:

    Huge amount of noise, little light and the Tories seem to be running a stealth campaign (or no campaign at all).

    I expect, but don't know, that the Torys are running a higly targeted campaign, delving, phoning and door knocking on people they think are pro-Brexit, and letting Labour and GG have an undignified fight without getting there hands too dirty.

    Borris did visit I think a week ago, which I dont think he would do if he did not think there was a good shot of wining.

    HYDF (Or something like that) often gets involved in Tory campaigning, and updates us but I haven't seen him on here for a few days,
    HYUFD, and he is a PB hero (except when he cites Trafalgar voodoo polling as gospel).
    Yes, that's him and thanks
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    dixiedean said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    The glory of a successful shot from a free kick is too much of a draw.
    It used to be like that with the long range shot, but it is slowly been "analysed" out of the game. Like free kicks, your probability of scoring is so low, especially at the highest levels were the keepers are so good.
    I guess the lighter ball and new shooting techniques which evolved from them, led to an absolute rash of direct free kick goals round the turn of the millennium.
    But goalies, analysis and walls have caught up with that.
    Football is really conservative, isn't it?
    Its true of lots of sports. NFL coaches rarely go for 4th down attempts, despite the analysts explaining for years how sub optimal it is not to in kany scenarios. NBA until about 5 years ago still encouraged players to try and make mid range 2 point shots, again despite all the analytical teams telling them the better strategy was that you either get it in close for an easy 2, or you kick it out for a 3. What seemed to finally swing it was Steph Curry showing the rest how you could win this way.

    Baseball has long been way ahead. Cricket via IPL is rapidly catching up, and football as well (but not in all areas, the dick swinging contest of direct free kicks seems still to be there).
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    Has there ever been a by-election in which the odds on favourite to take the seat has had so little publicity and flown so much under the radar?
    I only heard him mentioned by name for the first time today.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,334
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,927
    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    Argentina scored a great free kick against us in 98 like that. I have tried it a few times it does catch defenders out
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    I would be interested to see Carlos Vela on there.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744
    edited June 2021
    dixiedean said:

    Has there ever been a by-election in which the odds on favourite to take the seat has had so little publicity and flown so much under the radar?
    I only heard him mentioned by name for the first time today.

    More than I have. Thanks to your post I now know their gender (or at least their preferred pronoun).

    Part of me wonders if Labour will get a bit of sympathy vote or Galloway gets a backlash so they can save it, but it would be pretty amusing for [Insert name here] to win the seat after so little notice - the ultimate 'don't interrupt your enemies' by-election.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    As an aside, the dots inside the box are all presumably indirect free kicks, and therefore shouldn't be included in the statistics.
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489

    Not sure the egg-throwing rumour is true - I've talked with four ex-MPs (male and female) who have been canvassing in the Muslim ward, and they've not had any trouble. They say there are lots of Galloway posters there, but a lot of quiet Labour support too (and presumably some Tories, though they're invisible).

    I agree with Quincel, and have bet a fair sum in the same way. I think it's possible but unlikely that Labour will win, but I'm convinced we're well ahead of Galloway.

    Speaking of invisibility, the Tory campaign approach is interesting - so low-key that it has to be a deliberate strategy, with the candidate declining to talk to reporters. They presumably rely on their GOTV operation to get their vote out while Galloway gnaws at Labour. But there's a risk that the anti-Galloway vote (which definitely exists) will coalesce around Kim including some Tories - I talked to two Tory couples who were voting for her.

    That last possibility is probably a very real posibiaty, its going to be hard to predict haw big, because it may be the next few days such switches change there mind as more story's photos come out.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744
    Speaking of under the radar candidates, the Christian People's Alliance is standing, and theirs is a party name that is certainly familiar from myriad by-elections, but that never seems to shoot for controversy attention (or if they do they don't manage it successfully), yet stood over 20 candidates in the 2019 GE which is quite a lot for such a minor outfit. What drives them, I wonder.
  • Options
    TazTaz Posts: 11,167
    Where’s John Prescott when he’s needed ?
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,927
    Does anyone remember Galloways cough medicine? It was almost worth being ill for as a kid, I loved it
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,233
    kle4 said:

    Speaking of under the radar candidates, the Christian People's Alliance is standing, and theirs is a party name that is certainly familiar from myriad by-elections, but that never seems to shoot for controversy attention (or if they do they don't manage it successfully), yet stood over 20 candidates in the 2019 GE which is quite a lot for such a minor outfit. What drives them, I wonder.

    Given their targeting of Stella Creasy at the last GE, my guess would be that they are primarily motivated and sustained by a determination to make abortion an election issue, though obviously they'll accept votes from people motivated by homophobia too.
  • Options
    Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 7,540
    edited June 2021
    Here's the best free kick goal ever - Willie Carr, Coventry, 1970. Watch it to the end (only 40 seconds) because you need to see the replay. I remember this as a little kid.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjq2xT-tx38
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    isam said:

    dixiedean said:

    Alistair said:

    What's the ratio of free kick shots on goal to goals from them in this tournament ?

    In general it is actually very very low. Off the top of my head, I seemed to remember there was an analysis done a couple of seasons ago and Eriksen was the best performer with ~25% of free kick on target and he was well ahead of everybody else.
    Best free kick team would be Ward-Prowse on the left, Dybala on the right.

    I did say on target not scored...but cool graphic. Does emphasize how infrequent people score. Makes you wonder if it is even worth it, rather than just to manipulate the ball.
    But if no one tried to shoot for goal then the defense would setup differently making it harder to manipulate the ball.
    Obviously. But it is a rarity that there isn't a direct shot, which is categorised as often a "trick play". You can still set up as if to shoot is an option, with no intention of doing so.
    This has long been a bugbear of mine.
    6 or so defenders in the wall. Pass to the wing and get a cross in. Or pass and get a shot from a different angle negating the wall.
    You virtually never see it. And you have spare, unmarked attackers all around.
    Argentina scored a great free kick against us in 98 like that. I have tried it a few times it does catch defenders out
    Yes. I recall the USA almost equalizing v Belgium (?) in the WC. The guy ran up as if to shoot, but played a one-two with his own player standing in front of the wall.
    A fortunate deflection prevented it.
    It is so rare we can remember specific examples...
  • Options
    turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 15,185

    Here's the best free kick goal ever - Willie Carr, Coventry, 1970. Watch it to the end (only 40 seconds) because you need to see the replay. I remember this as a little kid.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjq2xT-tx38

    Didn't the rules get changed after?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Has there ever been a by-election in which the odds on favourite to take the seat has had so little publicity and flown so much under the radar?
    I only heard him mentioned by name for the first time today.

    More than I have. Thanks to your post I now know their gender (or at least their preferred pronoun).

    Part of me wonders if Labour will get a bit of sympathy vote or Galloway gets a backlash so they can save it, but it would be pretty amusing for [Insert name here] to win the seat after so little notice - the ultimate 'don't interrupt your enemies' by-election.
    Yes. Until today I thought the Tory candidate was an Asian female! Don't know where I got that idea from.
  • Options
    Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 7,540

    Here's the best free kick goal ever - Willie Carr, Coventry, 1970. Watch it to the end (only 40 seconds) because you need to see the replay. I remember this as a little kid.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjq2xT-tx38

    Didn't the rules get changed after?
    Yes, you could be right; I don't remember this being tried in subsequent seasons. Still, it was fun while it lasted!
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,174
    Off topic

    I grew up in the days of dirty Leeds, where Norman Hunter "bites her legs" was a code for breaks legs. Even my own Baggies under Johnny Giles got a reputation for bone breaking dangerous play. It is therefore something of a disappointment when the Euros have been peppered with European Super Players writhing around in agony having been gently brushed by an opponent. It annoys me that TV summarises are condoning this by saying how well a player has done by "buying a penalty or free kick".

    Here's the best free kick goal ever - Willie Carr, Coventry, 1970. Watch it to the end (only 40 seconds) because you need to see the replay. I remember this as a little kid.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjq2xT-tx38

    I got to know Ernie Hunt, he became the landlord of the Full Pitcher pub in Ledbury. The donkey kick was soon after made illegal. Still a great goal.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965
    Johanna Konta out of Wimbledon due to Covid contact.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,609
    dixiedean said:

    Johanna Konta out of Wimbledon due to Covid contact.

    I assume that in 22 days' time it wouldn't have mattered.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,374

    Not sure the egg-throwing rumour is true - I've talked with four ex-MPs (male and female) who have been canvassing in the Muslim ward, and they've not had any trouble. They say there are lots of Galloway posters there, but a lot of quiet Labour support too (and presumably some Tories, though they're invisible).

    I agree with Quincel, and have bet a fair sum in the same way. I think it's possible but unlikely that Labour will win, but I'm convinced we're well ahead of Galloway.

    Speaking of invisibility, the Tory campaign approach is interesting - so low-key that it has to be a deliberate strategy, with the candidate declining to talk to reporters. They presumably rely on their GOTV operation to get their vote out while Galloway gnaws at Labour. But there's a risk that the anti-Galloway vote (which definitely exists) will coalesce around Kim including some Tories - I talked to two Tory couples who were voting for her.

    The Standard quotes the Mayor and former MP, Tracy Brabin, on the assaults, and reports that the police are investigating.
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tracy-brabin-labour-batley-west-yorkshire-keir-starmer-b942884.html
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607
    Floater said:

    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334

    Unvaccinated but eligible under EMA authorisation. The government needs to get on and push for vaccines for 12+ and eventually 5+ once they become eligible.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    edited June 2021
    MaxPB said:

    Floater said:

    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334

    Unvaccinated but eligible under EMA authorisation. The government needs to get on and push for vaccines for 12+ and eventually 5+ once they become eligible.
    Hmm - not sure we should be changing policy just because some countries require it for travel. Tough though it is.

    Tbh i think France (currently) have it right. The risks from kids travelling with their (vaccinated) parents must be pretty small - they will spend the vast majority/all of their time within their family group.

    There is also the question - if vaccinated people can catch and spread the virus, but at no risk to themselves - where the "threat" from unvaccinated children is any greater than the "threat" from vaccinated adults.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607
    alex_ said:

    MaxPB said:

    Floater said:

    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334

    Unvaccinated but eligible under EMA authorisation. The government needs to get on and push for vaccines for 12+ and eventually 5+ once they become eligible.
    Hmm - not sure we should be changing policy just because some countries require it for travel. Tough though it is.

    Tbh i think France (currently) have it right. The risks from kids travelling with their (vaccinated) parents must be pretty small - they will spend the vast majority/all of their time within their family group.
    No, it's just the right thing to do. Kids have got a medium risk of hospitalisation with delta and in a high transmission environment like we expect after July 19th there is a big case to vaccinate them with our Pfizer doses and use Novavax and AZ for booster shots.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,174

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    Red meat for the Red wall.
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    MaxPB said:

    Floater said:

    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334

    Unvaccinated but eligible under EMA authorisation. The government needs to get on and push for vaccines for 12+ and eventually 5+ once they become eligible.
    Hmm - not sure we should be changing policy just because some countries require it for travel. Tough though it is.

    Tbh i think France (currently) have it right. The risks from kids travelling with their (vaccinated) parents must be pretty small - they will spend the vast majority/all of their time within their family group.
    No, it's just the right thing to do. Kids have got a medium risk of hospitalisation with delta and in a high transmission environment like we expect after July 19th there is a big case to vaccinate them with our Pfizer doses and use Novavax and AZ for booster shots.
    What does "medium risk" mean? I can't see them authorising AZ as a booster or otherwise. And Novavax isn't approved yet. Europe are also only accepting vaccines approved by the EMA.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    Red meat for the Red wall.
    MMMMMHHH red meat.....I could really eat a good steak.
  • Options
    AslanAslan Posts: 1,673

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,927

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    Any back page headlines about Czechs Bouncing?
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,981
    alex_ said:

    FPT

    Alistair said:

    FFS

    BREAKING: British No 1 Johanna Konta has been forced to withdraw from Wimbledon after going into self-isolation having been identified as a close contact of a person with coronavirus.

    Discussing the general situation with my wife and we are in agreement that it is now in a completely ridiculous situation.

    Cases are rocketing, the government are in no way taking societal level actions to suppress case numbers but we still have to self isolate after being a "close contact"

    It is a worst of all worlds situation. Either cases matter ro they don't. If they matter we must suppress, if they don't then fuck this self isolation nonsense.

    With Edinburgh case numbers now dwarfing January what chance my daughters summer holiday activities going ahead uninterrupted/at all? Close to zero.
    This is a key point. If it is official Government policy to largely disregard case numbers, then they need to do a lot better job of communicating this to the general public (and even, dare i say it, review their current testing policy which is almost designed to maximise case numbers).

    Because i suspect that headline numbers are still what most people look at, and there is much less focus/knowledge of hospitalisation numbers (and perhaps deaths). Because throughout the pandemic people have become trained to the idea that the latter are lagging factors, and will dismiss low numbers for them unless given good reasons not to do so.

    There is a big political danger if the Government lifts all restrictions on July 19th with case numbers still sky rocketing (there is the possibility, perhaps even probability by then that they will be on the turn, but that's not guaranteed) and it gets portrayed by sections of the media that this is just abandoning the health of the public to save money, end furlough etc.

    But have they got the communicators for that, and are they even trying?
    The effing axiomatic obsession with ‘cases’ (positive tests) has to end, yet as you say the government is beyond hopeless at communicating this. One can only hope Javid will do better.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    I predict masses of court battles if they did try to do this.
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,609
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,374
    Euro 2020 Betfair prices and their implied win probabilities.

    1 France 5.3 18.9%
    2 England 6.4 15.6%
    3 Italy 6.2 16.1%
    4 Germany 7.6 13.2%
    5 Spain 8.6 11.6%
    6 Belgium 9 11.1%
    7 Denmark 13 7.7%
    8 Czechia 36 2.8%
    9 Sweden 60 1.7%
    10 Croatia 90 1.1%
    110 bar
  • Options
    AslanAslan Posts: 1,673
    rcs1000 said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

    Sounds like "hostile environment" which is apparently the most evil thing ever.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    Aslan said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

    Sounds like "hostile environment" which is apparently the most evil thing ever.
    How to End Illegal Immigration:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG4NCHuvCC4&ab_channel=RobertSmithson
  • Options
    AslanAslan Posts: 1,673
    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,609
    edited June 2021
    During the 1992 election campaign, John Major was hit in the face by an egg, which left him with a cut face. I don't think the person who threw the egg got into very much trouble for doing it.
  • Options
    theProletheProle Posts: 948
    edited June 2021
    isam said:

    kle4 said:

    Speaking of under the radar candidates, the Christian People's Alliance is standing, and theirs is a party name that is certainly familiar from myriad by-elections, but that never seems to shoot for controversy attention (or if they do they don't manage it successfully), yet stood over 20 candidates in the 2019 GE which is quite a lot for such a minor outfit. What drives them, I wonder.

    Given their targeting of Stella Creasy at the last GE, my guess would be that they are primarily motivated and sustained by a determination to make abortion an election issue, though obviously they'll accept votes from people motivated by homophobia too.
    I don’t understand why being anti-abortion is put in the same category as being homophobic as if it’s a cruel thing. When I was 23, my girlfriend got pregnant and we had an abortion, mainly because we were on the rocks. I’d say it is the one thing I’ve done in my life that haunts me, and that if there is a day of reckoning could do for me.

    Obviously having been part of a couple that decided to have one, I am in no position to lecture anyone else about it, but I just can’t believe, when I think about it, that it is even legal.
    Fair play for posting that - I don't think many would admit to it.

    And I think that's actually what makes it such a viscerally savage debate. Everyone in their heart of hearts knows it's wrong - so a lot of people are having to quiet their own doubts, before making a case for it.
    You can see it in the language that the "pro-choice" activists use - they call it a "fetus", because that's less human than a baby - they call it a "procedure" - all little euphemisms so they don't have to talk about what they are really doing.

    And they certainly never talk about the potential for a lifetime of haunting guilt as a side effect. I've a friend who works in a care home - he was telling me about a resident with dementia whose few remaining decipherable phrases are to repeatedly call herself a murderer, because of a abortion in her past. I can't really think of anything more tragic or terrible to happen to a person.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Christ on a bike, we talked about anti-vaxxing in France might mean they don't hit really high rates, Romania looks like they have topped out at 25%.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

    Sounds like "hostile environment" which is apparently the most evil thing ever.
    How to End Illegal Immigration:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG4NCHuvCC4&ab_channel=RobertSmithson
    The comments are quite something! 10/10 for basing the video off of old Mr Smith's theories.
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489

    Christ on a bike, we talked about anti-vaxxing in France might mean they don't hit really high rates, Romania looks like they have topped out at 25%.

    That's still about twice Bulgaria,

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2021
    BigRich said:

    Christ on a bike, we talked about anti-vaxxing in France might mean they don't hit really high rates, Romania looks like they have topped out at 25%.

    That's still about twice Bulgaria,

    Yeap...but that is because they didn't go with the EU Pfizer order, only AZN and have big problem with supply.

    Romania has access to the same level of vaccines as all other EU nations, but run out of people who want to have it.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    Aslan said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
    Actually, I don't think either you or @alex_ are correct as to the mechanics.

    If you are paying a people smuggler, you will not be attempting to claim asylum. Asylum can only be claimed at a regular port of entry. If you have entered the country illegally, that isn't be possible.

    For that reason, @alex_ is incorrect about people attempting to claim asylum at a camp in (for example) Chad: it wouldn't be possible, because it wouldn't be a port of entry into the UK. However, it clearly won't have much impact on people smuggling, because those people aren't attempting to claim asylum anyway.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,609
    All of the most recent polls in Sweden but the opposition parties on 47% to 48%. Should be enough to win an election because of parties falling below the 4% threshold.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2022_Swedish_general_election#Vote_share
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    Chameleon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

    Sounds like "hostile environment" which is apparently the most evil thing ever.
    How to End Illegal Immigration:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG4NCHuvCC4&ab_channel=RobertSmithson
    The comments are quite something! 10/10 for basing the video off of old Mr Smith's theories.
    I'm quite proud of the 1,100 "downvotes" it achieved, which is (by a large margin) the most I ever managed on a video.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,896
    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
    Actually, I don't think either you or @alex_ are correct as to the mechanics.

    If you are paying a people smuggler, you will not be attempting to claim asylum. Asylum can only be claimed at a regular port of entry. If you have entered the country illegally, that isn't be possible.

    For that reason, @alex_ is incorrect about people attempting to claim asylum at a camp in (for example) Chad: it wouldn't be possible, because it wouldn't be a port of entry into the UK. However, it clearly won't have much impact on people smuggling, because those people aren't attempting to claim asylum anyway.
    Aren’t they being picked up by the British Navy in the channel, or arriving on a beach in Kent in a rickety old boat, and then claiming asylum?

    We should report France to the UN, as it must be such a horrible place to live.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,609
    rcs1000 said:

    Chameleon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    The biggest issue with the UK's asylum system, I've always felt, is that it is massively underfunded resulting in ridiculous time gaps between people applying for asylum and either being accepted or deported.

    Fact for the day: in Norway they don't bother deporting failed asylum seekers as it's cheaper to let them self deport themselves https://www.newsinenglish.no/2017/07/31/life-too-difficult-for-illegal-aliens/

    Sounds like "hostile environment" which is apparently the most evil thing ever.
    How to End Illegal Immigration:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG4NCHuvCC4&ab_channel=RobertSmithson
    The comments are quite something! 10/10 for basing the video off of old Mr Smith's theories.
    I'm quite proud of the 1,100 "downvotes" it achieved, which is (by a large margin) the most I ever managed on a video.
    Quite often, a video on YouTube with roughly an equal number of up and down votes is one that tells people something they need, but don't want to, hear.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
    Actually, I don't think either you or @alex_ are correct as to the mechanics.

    If you are paying a people smuggler, you will not be attempting to claim asylum. Asylum can only be claimed at a regular port of entry. If you have entered the country illegally, that isn't be possible.

    For that reason, @alex_ is incorrect about people attempting to claim asylum at a camp in (for example) Chad: it wouldn't be possible, because it wouldn't be a port of entry into the UK. However, it clearly won't have much impact on people smuggling, because those people aren't attempting to claim asylum anyway.
    Aren’t they being picked up by the British Navy in the channel, or arriving on a beach in Kent in a rickety old boat, and then claiming asylum?

    We should report France to the UN, as it must be such a horrible place to live.
    Ah yes, I see what you mean. They could - in theory, if not actuality - be on there way to Dover to report at the immigration office, and are therefore claiming to have been intercepted on there way there.

    If they land on the beach, mind, then they aren't attempting to get to an immigration officer at Dover. So, I don't see how they could claim asylum, and would therefore simply be in violation of the UK's immigration laws and therefore subject to immediate deportation.
  • Options
    AslanAslan Posts: 1,673
    rcs1000 said:

    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Aslan said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
    Actually, I don't think either you or @alex_ are correct as to the mechanics.

    If you are paying a people smuggler, you will not be attempting to claim asylum. Asylum can only be claimed at a regular port of entry. If you have entered the country illegally, that isn't be possible.

    For that reason, @alex_ is incorrect about people attempting to claim asylum at a camp in (for example) Chad: it wouldn't be possible, because it wouldn't be a port of entry into the UK. However, it clearly won't have much impact on people smuggling, because those people aren't attempting to claim asylum anyway.
    Aren’t they being picked up by the British Navy in the channel, or arriving on a beach in Kent in a rickety old boat, and then claiming asylum?

    We should report France to the UN, as it must be such a horrible place to live.
    Ah yes, I see what you mean. They could - in theory, if not actuality - be on there way to Dover to report at the immigration office, and are therefore claiming to have been intercepted on there way there.

    If they land on the beach, mind, then they aren't attempting to get to an immigration officer at Dover. So, I don't see how they could claim asylum, and would therefore simply be in violation of the UK's immigration laws and therefore subject to immediate deportation.
    "We got lost at sea and couldn't work out where Dover was. We were going to go there now."
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Floater said:

    Well, that is weird isn't it?

    She must have this wrong

    @MaltaTourism
    habe just confirmed to me in an email they are not accepting visitors between the ages of 12 and 16

    https://twitter.com/rebeccagil83/status/1409056298088419334

    Not really.

    Double vaccinated anyone without quarantine

    Kids under 12 don’t need to be jabbed

    Unfortunately there’s a gap
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    End of course student trips from mainland to Majorca have triggered around 900 cases all over Spain as infected students return home from a few days of revelry. A sign of what is to come next month and in August? Meanwhile the rules continue to be relaxed and the vax target is 70% at least one jab by end of August. Very hard not to be somewhat nervous.
  • Options
    moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,244
    Looks like ufo disclosure might happen in the most American way possible - litigation.

    Kevin Day was the carrier group radar operator during David Fravor’s 2004 tic tac encounter from the USS Nimitz. Day says that trying to speak out about it within the military’s structures effectively cost him his career. Now the Pentagon has formally acknowledged not only the “sociocultural stigmas” hampering data collection but at least 18 Navy interactions with ultra tech UFO’s (presumably one of which is the Nimitz incident), Day is seeking an apology and financial compensation.

    https://nypost.com/2021/06/27/navy-tic-tac-ufo-witness-demands-public-apology-for-ridicule/
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,274
    All of Italy became a mask-free, “low-risk” zone for coronavirus Monday, marking a dramatic milestone for the first European country to be hit by the global pandemic in February 2020, AFP reports.

    In a decree that took effect Monday, the health ministry for the first time classified each of Italy’s 20 regions as “white”, signifying low risk, under the country’s colour-coded classification system that evaluates Covid-19 risk.

    That means facemasks will no longer be compulsory in outdoor areas - welcome news across the country where an ongoing heatwave is expected to push temperatures past 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in some southern areas this week.


    New cases in Italy are now running at fewer than a thousand a day, while ours are about twenty times higher.
  • Options
    Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Andy_JS said:

    dixiedean said:

    Johanna Konta out of Wimbledon due to Covid contact.

    I assume that in 22 days' time it wouldn't have mattered.
    We just don't know, do we? What may very well happen is that the roadmap is completed on schedule on the new date of July 19th, but cases are still high (and quite possibly continuing to rise) and the existing policies on self-isolation remain in place. Even if masks and social distancing go, we shouldn't automatically assume that anything will change with regard to the encouragement to use home testing kits, signing into venues and contact tracing.

    Javid's presence might change things, but one should never underestimate the incompetence of this Government. We could quite easily find ourselves in a situation come September where the hospitals are coping easily, deaths are running at perhaps a couple of hundred, mostly unvaccinated or very old, people a week, but millions of us are stuck at home going through repeated cycles of being locked up by the test and trace system.
  • Options
    Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    IanB2 said:

    All of Italy became a mask-free, “low-risk” zone for coronavirus Monday, marking a dramatic milestone for the first European country to be hit by the global pandemic in February 2020, AFP reports.

    In a decree that took effect Monday, the health ministry for the first time classified each of Italy’s 20 regions as “white”, signifying low risk, under the country’s colour-coded classification system that evaluates Covid-19 risk.

    That means facemasks will no longer be compulsory in outdoor areas - welcome news across the country where an ongoing heatwave is expected to push temperatures past 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in some southern areas this week.


    New cases in Italy are now running at fewer than a thousand a day, while ours are about twenty times higher.

    Presumably they've not been properly whacked by Delta - yet.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,983
    Good morning one and all.

    Two cases in my extended family, both in the Greater Blackburn area, both recently vaccinated. One of them described it as rather like mild 'flu; isolated, but nothing to worry about. Both in their mid 20's.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,298
    IanB2 said:

    All of Italy became a mask-free, “low-risk” zone for coronavirus Monday, marking a dramatic milestone for the first European country to be hit by the global pandemic in February 2020, AFP reports.

    In a decree that took effect Monday, the health ministry for the first time classified each of Italy’s 20 regions as “white”, signifying low risk, under the country’s colour-coded classification system that evaluates Covid-19 risk.

    That means facemasks will no longer be compulsory in outdoor areas - welcome news across the country where an ongoing heatwave is expected to push temperatures past 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in some southern areas this week.


    New cases in Italy are now running at fewer than a thousand a day, while ours are about twenty times higher.

    This is the risk that the govt faces. In the ebb and flow of Us vs The Rest and in particular the EU we may yet fall behind and therefore see the "vaccine boost" evaporate.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    All of Italy became a mask-free, “low-risk” zone for coronavirus Monday, marking a dramatic milestone for the first European country to be hit by the global pandemic in February 2020, AFP reports.

    In a decree that took effect Monday, the health ministry for the first time classified each of Italy’s 20 regions as “white”, signifying low risk, under the country’s colour-coded classification system that evaluates Covid-19 risk.

    That means facemasks will no longer be compulsory in outdoor areas - welcome news across the country where an ongoing heatwave is expected to push temperatures past 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in some southern areas this week.


    New cases in Italy are now running at fewer than a thousand a day, while ours are about twenty times higher.

    How much higher is our testing?
  • Options
    moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,244
    Javid’s for job in my view is deciding about kids. Is he happy to let covid rip through kids or not. If yes, stop with the stupid school bubbles and routine testing and isolation of kids. If not (long covid in kids?) what’s the plan Saj?

    It would be intolerable if we get to Sept and are still isolating school kids with no or mild symptoms and shutting down whole classes over it.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,217

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    England. Governed by twats for twats.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,217
    Aslan said:

    alex_ said:

    Aslan said:

    TIMES: Patel plans for migrants to be held in offshore hub

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1409258209001541632?s=20

    It's smart policy. You massively reduce the incentive to smuggle yourself into Britain if you will be offshore again for processing.
    Does it? I assume that people smuggling themselves into Britain without a valid claim for asylum do not, as a rule, present themselves to the authorities for processing.

    Meanwhile, if you create an “offshore centre” somewhere in Africa don’t you potentially increase significantly the numbers presenting with a valid claim?
    Many of those smuggling themselves into Britain know they will get caught in the Channel/at the coast. They ensure all their papers/passports are lost so we don't have anywhere to deport them to, and know their case will take long enough they will likely get let out into society at some point, especially if they have kids. And then they can disappear.
    The Tories have chosen the wrong country for their concentration camp. Was supposed to be Madagascar. Or, given that Patel is doing this, why not Uganda?
  • Options
    fox327fox327 Posts: 366

    Andy_JS said:

    dixiedean said:

    Johanna Konta out of Wimbledon due to Covid contact.

    I assume that in 22 days' time it wouldn't have mattered.
    We just don't know, do we? What may very well happen is that the roadmap is completed on schedule on the new date of July 19th, but cases are still high (and quite possibly continuing to rise) and the existing policies on self-isolation remain in place. Even if masks and social distancing go, we shouldn't automatically assume that anything will change with regard to the encouragement to use home testing kits, signing into venues and contact tracing.

    Javid's presence might change things, but one should never underestimate the incompetence of this Government. We could quite easily find ourselves in a situation come September where the hospitals are coping easily, deaths are running at perhaps a couple of hundred, mostly unvaccinated or very old, people a week, but millions of us are stuck at home going through repeated cycles of being locked up by the test and trace system.
    All the measures that we have got were put in place by Hancock and Gove over a period of 16 months. Now that Javid is Health Secretary he is in a position to change things. If he wants to revise all these policies he will need to keep his job as Health Secretary for some time. That may not be easy.
This discussion has been closed.