MON: Has it undermined message about being "all in it together", PM: "That's right, & that's why when I saw the story on Fri we had a new SoS for health on Sat"
My local Tesco store that's just been built is now advertising "free" charging for Volkswagen vehicles with its chargers. That seems like an interesting partnership, though I've no idea how long it would last as "free".
As it says the chargers are VW-sponsored PodPoint units. Anyone with the app and a cable can use them for free.
How long will they remain free? Depends on who is paying the bill - the site or the network? If the site then I can see how free charging is a pull vs no / paid charging at a different supermarket. If the network then not for long!
Fun problem. So many of these 7kW units are let unmaintained and unloved after install. They get vandalised and broken and then its not owned by the site its located on and its not owned by the network logo on the post who just do the billing and it stays broken.
The manufacturers really need to get together to sort out the EV infrastructure problem.
SMMT and DfT need to bang heads together to get it working properly, the infrastructure issues are a major barrier to EV adoption. Only Tesla have done it right.
We ran a Leaf 2014 - 2017, I'm on my second PHEV and we've now got an Ioniq EV. Once you've had an electric drivetrain you never want to go back to a gearbox.
But - and its a big but - I am not going to rely on a charge network to get me anywhere, because there's no guarantee they will be delivering at the posted speed, available, or working at all. Add in the multiplicity of networks and batshit crazy "run a Roller for less" pricing and its game over.
Seriously looked at a Tesla twice now. The lack of an interior and horror show build quality out me off a 3 even before noting how small the thing is. Then a Polestar 2 until the reviews noted the awful inefficiency. Now waiting to see how the Ioniq 5 pans out.
We are going BMW i4 for Mrs DA's next car. She wouldn't entertain anything but a BEV now she's had one for a few years.
Game over for Geraint Thomas - looks like he's managed to break his collarbone. Looked weak yesterday anyway so top 5 was a stretch.
Correction - up and running again but doesn't look happy and no team mate sent back to help yet. Appears his mistake has caused Robert Gesink to leave the race though which is a real shame.
My local Tesco store that's just been built is now advertising "free" charging for Volkswagen vehicles with its chargers. That seems like an interesting partnership, though I've no idea how long it would last as "free".
As it says the chargers are VW-sponsored PodPoint units. Anyone with the app and a cable can use them for free.
How long will they remain free? Depends on who is paying the bill - the site or the network? If the site then I can see how free charging is a pull vs no / paid charging at a different supermarket. If the network then not for long!
Fun problem. So many of these 7kW units are let unmaintained and unloved after install. They get vandalised and broken and then its not owned by the site its located on and its not owned by the network logo on the post who just do the billing and it stays broken.
The manufacturers really need to get together to sort out the EV infrastructure problem.
SMMT and DfT need to bang heads together to get it working properly, the infrastructure issues are a major barrier to EV adoption. Only Tesla have done it right.
We ran a Leaf 2014 - 2017, I'm on my second PHEV and we've now got an Ioniq EV. Once you've had an electric drivetrain you never want to go back to a gearbox.
But - and its a big but - I am not going to rely on a charge network to get me anywhere, because there's no guarantee they will be delivering at the posted speed, available, or working at all. Add in the multiplicity of networks and batshit crazy "run a Roller for less" pricing and its game over.
Seriously looked at a Tesla twice now. The lack of an interior and horror show build quality out me off a 3 even before noting how small the thing is. Then a Polestar 2 until the reviews noted the awful inefficiency. Now waiting to see how the Ioniq 5 pans out.
We are going BMW i4 for Mrs DA's next car. She wouldn't entertain anything but a BEV now she's had one for a few years.
Ewww - modern BMWs are gopping. WTF are they doing with those vast nostril grills? I used to laugh at Alfa Romeo putting a vagina on their cars, but BMW have gone one better.
Journalists needs to ask Leadbetter and Starmer about that leaflet. By producing such a horror leaflet, Labour certainly can't claim any sort of moral high ground over Galloway or the Tories now.
I think the Hindu vote for Labour is now going to go away. How dumb and just shitty can they be at this?
How’s this different to Corbyn’s Labour putting a picture of an Israeli politician with a Tory on a leaflet aimed at getting the Muslim vote?
I think it shows Corbyn at al are more pro Muslim than anti Semitic, and Sir Keir’s lot are no different
Journalists needs to ask Leadbetter and Starmer about that leaflet. By producing such a horror leaflet, Labour certainly can't claim any sort of moral high ground over Galloway or the Tories now.
I think the Hindu vote for Labour is now going to go away. How dumb and just shitty can they be at this?
There's less Hindus than there are Muslims in the UK. Labour have always played the numbers game when it comes to winning migrant votes.
There are but deliberately, or stupidly, driving them away actually into the arms of the other party of government is insane. Worse than Thornberry and her flag tweet. It is becoming the kamikaze party.
The most efficient electric car is the err..... Renault Twizy.
..and the reliability of French cars is....
Touching wood here, but my 09 reg Peugeot is still going OK
The most environmentally friendly car is almost always the one you have, running into the ground until the servicing costs get too high.
Having to ditch my old Merc in October because of the ULEZ extension. 28 years old, never given a moment's trouble. My oldest possession bar my chess set. Choked about it. Mental image of it being squashed into a dense little cube and with its dying breath wondering, "But what did I do wrong?" Considering some therapy for the immediate aftermath of the dreaded day.
Er, no. If the National Museum of Scotland wants to give back stuff, that's entirely up to them - but it does not remotely mean the British Museum has to too.....
One might give the Greeks the Elgin marbles as an act of generosity, but there is little question that they were acquired legitimately.
Best solution I've seen is to make identical facsimiles (which with modern scanning tech ought to be relatively simple), and given them back half the originals and half new copies.
Scotrail might do better to concentrate on providing a good rail service instead of showing off their virtue and looking ignorant and discriminatory to boot.
In what way are ScotRail discriminatory? Do you support the request for a "Straight Pride" train?
As I said, all this painting is silly. I would no more ask for this than to to go to the moon in a pea green boat. The customer making the request was being silly.
But they have taken a view without informing themselves and adopted a position which others might think discriminatory towards them eg by tweeting about gay and trans people being attacked without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened, in some cases by the very people Scotrail is praising.
Frankly it would be best if they didn't start mouthing off to customers in this way. It is not the job of a service provider to lecture a customer about politics. A polite "Our trains are for everyone all the time" would have made the point far better.
Yes all our trains are for everyone is a great slogan.
However, your conflating straight people being attacked with gay and trans people being attacked is straight out of the "what about male victims of female rape/why don't we have men's month/etc" playbook.
You all of a sudden put yourself in the same (pea green) boat as a bunch of super undesirables.
No it isn't. Those super-undesirables you refer to are lesbians and women being attacked for wanting equality. It is outrageous and may even be a criminal offence that a there are threats to murder a well know female writer on the streets of London, with no-one apparently battling an eyelid.
You misrepresenting what I say and making a vague accusation about undesirables is straight out of the playbook of men trying to shut women up when they don't like what they have to say.
I can’t be the only one who finds the idea of a gay train a bit, umm, Chris Morris….
Scotrail might do better to concentrate on providing a good rail service instead of showing off their virtue and looking ignorant and discriminatory to boot.
In what way are ScotRail discriminatory? Do you support the request for a "Straight Pride" train?
As I said, all this painting is silly. I would no more ask for this than to to go to the moon in a pea green boat. The customer making the request was being silly.
But they have taken a view without informing themselves and adopted a position which others might think discriminatory towards them eg by tweeting about gay and trans people being attacked without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened, in some cases by the very people Scotrail is praising.
Frankly it would be best if they didn't start mouthing off to customers in this way. It is not the job of a service provider to lecture a customer about politics. A polite "Our trains are for everyone all the time" would have made the point far better.
Yes all our trains are for everyone is a great slogan.
However, your conflating straight people being attacked with gay and trans people being attacked is straight out of the "what about male victims of female rape/why don't we have men's month/etc" playbook.
You all of a sudden put yourself in the same (pea green) boat as a bunch of super undesirables.
No it isn't. Those super-undesirables you refer to are lesbians and women being attacked for wanting equality. It is outrageous and may even be a criminal offence that a there are threats to murder a well know female writer on the streets of London, with no-one apparently battling an eyelid.
You misrepresenting what I say and making a vague accusation about undesirables is straight out of the playbook of men trying to shut women up when they don't like what they have to say.
Nah not true. Why would I want to shut you up on an internet chat room? Wouldn't be that interesting, would it.
You said, apropos ScotRail specifically supporting trans and gay rights "...without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened..."
That is exactly of the type of comment similar to, usually men, bewailing the lack of white history month or who bemoan the lack of attention given to male victims of rape in response to an outcry or publicity over a woman who has been raped.
And the super-undesirables I referred to are certainly not lesbians and women being attacked. They are usually blokes and also usually white blokes.
Journalists needs to ask Leadbetter and Starmer about that leaflet. By producing such a horror leaflet, Labour certainly can't claim any sort of moral high ground over Galloway or the Tories now.
I think the Hindu vote for Labour is now going to go away. How dumb and just shitty can they be at this?
There's less Hindus than there are Muslims in the UK. Labour have always played the numbers game when it comes to winning migrant votes.
There are but deliberately, or stupidly, driving them away actually into the arms of the other party of government is insane. Worse than Thornberry and her flag tweet. It is becoming the kamikaze party.
The most efficient electric car is the err..... Renault Twizy.
..and the reliability of French cars is....
Touching wood here, but my 09 reg Peugeot is still going OK
The most environmentally friendly car is almost always the one you have, running into the ground until the servicing costs get too high.
Having to ditch my old Merc in October because of the ULEZ extension. 28 years old, never given a moment's trouble. My oldest possession bar my chess set. Choked about it. Mental image of it being squashed into a dense little cube and with its dying breath wondering, "But what did I do wrong?" Considering some therapy for the immediate aftermath of the dreaded day.
Someone up north, where no-one has heard an ULEZ, will take it off you.
List it on Pistonheads, with a suitably sentimental narrative advert, and they might highlight it on their forum.
Scotrail might do better to concentrate on providing a good rail service instead of showing off their virtue and looking ignorant and discriminatory to boot.
In what way are ScotRail discriminatory? Do you support the request for a "Straight Pride" train?
As I said, all this painting is silly. I would no more ask for this than to to go to the moon in a pea green boat. The customer making the request was being silly.
But they have taken a view without informing themselves and adopted a position which others might think discriminatory towards them eg by tweeting about gay and trans people being attacked without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened, in some cases by the very people Scotrail is praising.
Frankly it would be best if they didn't start mouthing off to customers in this way. It is not the job of a service provider to lecture a customer about politics. A polite "Our trains are for everyone all the time" would have made the point far better.
Yes all our trains are for everyone is a great slogan.
However, your conflating straight people being attacked with gay and trans people being attacked is straight out of the "what about male victims of female rape/why don't we have men's month/etc" playbook.
You all of a sudden put yourself in the same (pea green) boat as a bunch of super undesirables.
No it isn't. Those super-undesirables you refer to are lesbians and women being attacked for wanting equality. It is outrageous and may even be a criminal offence that a there are threats to murder a well know female writer on the streets of London, with no-one apparently battling an eyelid.
You misrepresenting what I say and making a vague accusation about undesirables is straight out of the playbook of men trying to shut women up when they don't like what they have to say.
I can’t be the only one who finds the idea of a gay train a bit, umm, Chris Morris….
Very funny. It's not a gay train, it's a train decked out to show support for an oft-oppressed minority.
It is also of course a marketing tool to position ScotRail as occupying a certain market position which they hope will be beneficial to them and their future revenue.
People focus on range, and in doing so miss efficiency. We don't talk about fossil cars that way - its how much fuel do they burn not how big is the fuel talk. Should be the same for EVs, where some of the companies finally adapting to EVs are bringing in chronically poor inefficient supply chains. VW's build quality and efficiency is so poor with the ID3/4 its almost as if they want their EVs to fail.
Hyundai EVs are right up there with Tesla on efficiency and way better on build quality. If I just wanted transport that's what I'd get.
In other VW news I recently bought a 20,000km 4.0 WR8 engine from a B5 Passat. WHY?
Parts ? You've always wanted a W8, and it's the only one ever produced commercially ? As an art installation ?
Isn't this just like the opening scene of the Thick of It:
Malcolm Tucker : Seriously, the PM likes you personally. I like you personally, and we have absolutely no desire to get rid of you. I just want you to know that. None of this negative stuff is coming from us.
Cliff Lawton Matt Hancock : Oh, Mal, mate, that... makes a big difference, makes me feel a lot more secure.
Malcolm Tucker : Does it? Well, that's difficult.
Matt Hancock : What's difficult?
Malcolm Tucker : Just endless headlines, just endless, day after day, chipping away at your confidence.
Matt Hancock : Absolutely.
Malcolm Tucker : See, the thing is, that we're starting to look weak. Everyone say "When's he gonna go? When's he gonna go?".
Matt Hancock : Right...
Malcolm Tucker : And you don't want us to look weak, do you?
Matt Hancock : No, no...
Malcolm Tucker : So there you are. That's why you got to go.
Yes, same here. But they know even less about the science and ethical concerns than I do. Peer pressure can't trump what is lowest risk approach for them. There will be arguments in households up and down the land over this.
I posted about this a couple of months ago. I have a 15 year old and a 17 year old, my default position is that I would not encourage them to be vaccinated until they are 18 and can make their own decision. But what if they demand to be vaccinated - do I refuse consent?
I hesitate to advise on someone else's family decisions, but I think at 15-17 with a potentially very serious illness around, it's reasonable to let them have the vaccination if they want to.
@NickPalmer Yes - I agree if I was convinced that the risk to them personally of catching Covid exceeds the risk to them from having the vaccine. Especially for the 15 year old. (The 17 year old will be 18 in six months so I agree she may be close enough). The boffins need to do more to convince me, that's all.
Isn't this just like the opening scene of the Thick of It:
Malcolm Tucker : Seriously, the PM likes you personally. I like you personally, and we have absolutely no desire to get rid of you. I just want you to know that. None of this negative stuff is coming from us.
Cliff Lawton Matt Hancock : Oh, Mal, mate, that... makes a big difference, makes me feel a lot more secure.
Malcolm Tucker : Does it? Well, that's difficult.
Matt Hancock : What's difficult?
Malcolm Tucker : Just endless headlines, just endless, day after day, chipping away at your confidence.
Matt Hancock : Absolutely.
Malcolm Tucker : See, the thing is, that we're starting to look weak. Everyone say "When's he gonna go? When's he gonna go?".
Matt Hancock : Right...
Malcolm Tucker : And you don't want us to look weak, do you?
Matt Hancock : No, no...
Malcolm Tucker : So there you are. That's why you got to go.
"A woman confronted the staff at the Wi Spa in Los Angeles after a man walked into the women's section with his genitals hanging out in front of girls. He identified as a "woman." The employees said he had a right to do that. The employees say that it's the law."
Get with the program gender critical women. This is the future. Bearded men explaining what it is to be a woman and what a woman is.
As if we haven't had men telling us that for centuries. And exposing themselves to us as well. And behaving like perverts etc.
Only now we're utterly fed up with it. So we say no to all this bullshit.
Yes, it is awful and if women dare to dissent against this bullshit they get attacked, no platformed, sacked and reviled by a tiny minority. Men who think they know what being a woman is.
I was fully on board with the trans lobby until I read of the cotton ceiling and lesbians being guilt shamed for not welcoming ‘girldick’.
Sorry… have I understood that correctly…
If a man self-identities as a woman, lesbians are supported to sleep with her?
Hmmm… 🤔
People sleep with who they want to if the desire is reciprocal. The biggest single exception is men forcing themselves on women in one way or another. The trans aspect to this is really lost in the margins. It's just that it has a certain prurient fascination.
Guilt shaming lesbians who don’t want to sleep with women who still have their male parts is not acceptable
And yet it is the logical consequence of self-id gender ideology.
No it isn't. Because they never have to sleep with anyone they don't want to. For whatever reason.
They don't. But they are being accused of transphobia and attacked. It is one reason why some lesbian groups have set up away from Stonewall and in opposition to it, precisely because they are worried about the consequences of self-id for lesbians.
This is a real issue for lesbians who feel that the demands of men wishing to transition are taking precedence over the rights of women and lesbians in particular.
I suspect we are largely in agreement here.
If a man wants to dress as a woman that is no problem. If a man want to live as a woman that is no problem. If a man wants to take part in women's sporting events that are restricted to women that is a problem. However he/she wishes to self identify, he/she does not qualify. The weight lifting thing in the Olympics is absurd. If a man wants to make use of "safe spaces" for women such as toilets, prisons, changing rooms there is a conflict of rights but in my view that conflict should be resolved in favour of those born with the sex of a women if they are at risk. That is why those spaces exist.
But no one, ever, is obliged to have sex with anyone else. That is all I was saying.
It is not quite that simple though is it. You meet someone in the bar you are attracted, you wine her and dine her over a couple of weeks then you find out she isn't a women/man depending on your gender.
At what point does it become incumbent on someone to mention it before it becomes deception? You whether he or she may be spending money on someone that you wouldn't have done if you had known up front. This sort of thing is going to crop up and I fully expect lawsuits about it.
Isn't the simplest way to simply employ the Croc Dundee greeting whenever you meet someone new?
Also legally is it even deception?
If a transwoman (biological man) identifies as and is legally a woman, even if they have a penis, then why would they need to say that they have a penis or are biologically a man?
Which is kind of messed up, but legally is there any grounds for it to be considered a deception?
That the girl you've picked up has a penis may be a bit more of a shock than that she has a third nipple or false leg, but is there any law that says it needs to be declared?
That was a woman posing as a man. She was acting fraudulently.
A transwoman is a biological man who is legally a woman. So if she calls herself a woman, the law agrees that she is a woman, so no deception has occurred.
If you disagree with that, surely that's an issue in the law, not the individual committing a crime?
No, the law doesn’t agree. Self ID is not the law yet.
The question was if they're legally a woman, not self-identifying as one.
You can in law now be legally a woman with a penis.
Ludicrous.. and conversely a man without one ?
Indeed. Men do now give birth.
How nice for them.
They might do.in the eyes of the law but most normal people will think.it ludicrous.
The most efficient electric car is the err..... Renault Twizy.
..and the reliability of French cars is....
Touching wood here, but my 09 reg Peugeot is still going OK
The most environmentally friendly car is almost always the one you have, running into the ground until the servicing costs get too high.
Having to ditch my old Merc in October because of the ULEZ extension. 28 years old, never given a moment's trouble. My oldest possession bar my chess set. Choked about it. Mental image of it being squashed into a dense little cube and with its dying breath wondering, "But what did I do wrong?" Considering some therapy for the immediate aftermath of the dreaded day.
Someone up north, where no-one has heard an ULEZ, will take it off you.
List it on Pistonheads, with a suitably sentimental narrative advert, and they might highlight it on their forum.
Or, indeed, move himself up north, with car. We love a bit of fossil-fuel particulate action up here. Reminds us of when we ate, breathed and slept in coal. Now Drax is cutting out a few million years by burning wood directly, it's just not the same
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
Trolley Fri: Argh, accept apology I consider the matter closed Media/MP babble, 89 Carrie texts p/hour Trolley Sat, SMASH: Arghhh Matt go now you'll be back better stronger shortly matey forward to victory! Trolley Mon, CRASH: when I saw the story on Fri we had a new SoS on Sat https://twitter.com/Dominic2306/status/1409488850855071748
Journalists needs to ask Leadbetter and Starmer about that leaflet. By producing such a horror leaflet, Labour certainly can't claim any sort of moral high ground over Galloway or the Tories now.
I think the Hindu vote for Labour is now going to go away. How dumb and just shitty can they be at this?
There's less Hindus than there are Muslims in the UK. Labour have always played the numbers game when it comes to winning migrant votes.
There are but deliberately, or stupidly, driving them away actually into the arms of the other party of government is insane. Worse than Thornberry and her flag tweet. It is becoming the kamikaze party.
The most efficient electric car is the err..... Renault Twizy.
..and the reliability of French cars is....
Touching wood here, but my 09 reg Peugeot is still going OK
The most environmentally friendly car is almost always the one you have, running into the ground until the servicing costs get too high.
Having to ditch my old Merc in October because of the ULEZ extension. 28 years old, never given a moment's trouble. My oldest possession bar my chess set. Choked about it. Mental image of it being squashed into a dense little cube and with its dying breath wondering, "But what did I do wrong?" Considering some therapy for the immediate aftermath of the dreaded day.
Someone up north, where no-one has heard an ULEZ, will take it off you.
List it on Pistonheads, with a suitably sentimental narrative advert, and they might highlight it on their forum.
Yes, good idea. Or - even better - maybe I can give it to somebody I know who lives outside ULEZ. With visiting rights.
All PMs say that when a minister resigns. Same as the whole letter writing nonsense, yes well I have to go, oh I am so sorry, you have been really good, I hope you can return soon....in time of Blair / Brown, it was often while doing a little dance about being able to get rid of a total shit (after they themselves placed the dirt in the papers).
Trolley Fri: Argh, accept apology I consider the matter closed Media/MP babble, 89 Carrie texts p/hour Trolley Sat, SMASH: Arghhh Matt go now you'll be back better stronger shortly matey forward to victory! Trolley Mon, CRASH: when I saw the story on Fri we had a new SoS on Sat https://twitter.com/Dominic2306/status/1409488850855071748
On Planet Dom, maybe.
On Planet Earth, on Friday Boris supported Hancock's decision not to resign and didn't (or couldn't) sack him.
Then Hancock decided to resign, in the face of overwhelming criticism, and Boris now has to support that.
The situation is only back because of the substance of it, there is no second story about how it was announced.
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
All PMs say that when a minister resigns. Same as the whole letter writing nonsense, yes well I have to go, oh I am so sorry, you have been really good, I hope you can return soon....in time of Blair / Brown, it was often while doing a little dance about being able to get rid of a total shit (after they themselves placed the dirt in the papers).
There are subtleties though. Often when someone is sacked there's reference to being 'asked' to resign for instance
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
You can't then really stand on your moral high ground and complain about others doing it though.
All PMs say that when a minister resigns. Same as the whole letter writing nonsense, yes well I have to go, oh I am so sorry, you have been really good, I hope you can return soon....in time of Blair / Brown, it was often while doing a little dance about being able to get rid of a total shit (after they themselves placed the dirt in the papers).
It’s always the same, a minister is never formally dismissed, the closest you might get is “In light of our conversation this morning I have decided that it is in the best interests of government that I resign my position”.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
England has become a place where politics is decided by Asian religious factionalism - who would have thought it?! It was completely unpredictable. Why didn’t someone warn us this might happen?
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
You can't then really stand on your moral high ground and complain about others doing it though.
That's fine. Perfectly happy for others to also point out the Tories' islamophobia problem.
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
In a subsequent statement, a DWP spokesman said: "We will look into this specific letter in case any misleading information was inadvertently given out.
"However, what is absolutely clear is that it will be the responsibility of an independent Scottish government, not the UK government, to make arrangement for pensions for citizens of an independent Scotland.
"There can be no guarantee that it will be at the same level as it is now."
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
I'd like someone to ask SKS what his policy is on India and Modi.
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
FFS.....BBC headline...Double jabbed people can be infected - like Andrew Marr, says scientist
No shit sherlock. The point is it is a very small number and they won't suffer serious symptoms. Nobody claims even Pfizer is 100% against infection. And two double jabbed people meeting one another, the chances of absolutely tiny and why it is sensible to be cautious out in general populous where the young are mostly single (or not) jabbed at the moment.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
Scotrail might do better to concentrate on providing a good rail service instead of showing off their virtue and looking ignorant and discriminatory to boot.
In what way are ScotRail discriminatory? Do you support the request for a "Straight Pride" train?
As I said, all this painting is silly. I would no more ask for this than to to go to the moon in a pea green boat. The customer making the request was being silly.
But they have taken a view without informing themselves and adopted a position which others might think discriminatory towards them eg by tweeting about gay and trans people being attacked without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened, in some cases by the very people Scotrail is praising.
Frankly it would be best if they didn't start mouthing off to customers in this way. It is not the job of a service provider to lecture a customer about politics. A polite "Our trains are for everyone all the time" would have made the point far better.
Yes all our trains are for everyone is a great slogan.
However, your conflating straight people being attacked with gay and trans people being attacked is straight out of the "what about male victims of female rape/why don't we have men's month/etc" playbook.
You all of a sudden put yourself in the same (pea green) boat as a bunch of super undesirables.
No it isn't. Those super-undesirables you refer to are lesbians and women being attacked for wanting equality. It is outrageous and may even be a criminal offence that a there are threats to murder a well know female writer on the streets of London, with no-one apparently battling an eyelid.
You misrepresenting what I say and making a vague accusation about undesirables is straight out of the playbook of men trying to shut women up when they don't like what they have to say.
I can’t be the only one who finds the idea of a gay train a bit, umm, Chris Morris….
Very funny. It's not a gay train, it's a train decked out to show support for an oft-oppressed minority.
It is also of course a marketing tool to position ScotRail as occupying a certain market position which they hope will be beneficial to them and their future revenue.
The furore over it seems a little ridiculous. Within a year they'll have taken the vinyls off and replaced them with something drab and ordinary.
Last year LNER renamed the Flying Scotsman the 'Flying Scotswoman' to mark International Women's Day. I see no reason why there should not be similar for another historically-maligned group such as homosexuals. Celebrating differences does not automatically denigrate those who are not 'different'.
FFS.....BBC headline...Double jabbed people can be infected - like Andrew Marr, says scientist
No shit sherlock. The point is it is a very small number and they won't suffer serious symptoms. Nobody claims even Pfizer is 100% against infection.
Marr described it as a "summer cold" and "very unpleasent" which says more about his (lack of) general immune system to my mind. He'd 100% be hospitalised without vaccination.
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
In a subsequent statement, a DWP spokesman said: "We will look into this specific letter in case any misleading information was inadvertently given out.
"However, what is absolutely clear is that it will be the responsibility of an independent Scottish government, not the UK government, to make arrangement for pensions for citizens of an independent Scotland.
"There can be no guarantee that it will be at the same level as it is now."
All PMs say that when a minister resigns. Same as the whole letter writing nonsense, yes well I have to go, oh I am so sorry, you have been really good, I hope you can return soon....in time of Blair / Brown, it was often while doing a little dance about being able to get rid of a total shit (after they themselves placed the dirt in the papers).
Quite so. But do they also say "the PM has accepted his apology and the matter is closed" on numerous occasions during a Friday press briefing?
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
I'd like someone to ask SKS what his policy is on India and Modi.
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
C'mon Carnyx. You really think a rUK Govt is going to subsidise the pensions of people who are citizens of what would be a foreign country? And whose own Govt has just spent years execrating the Govt of said rUK.
there is no second story about how it was announced.
The second story is Bozo now tying to claim credit because he looks weak for not having acted
Prime Minister Boris Johnson faced questions about his government’s “moral compass” following the Matt Hancock row.
Asked whether it undermined the message about being “all in it together”, Johnson said: “That’s right, and that’s why when I saw the story on Friday we had a new secretary of state for health in on Saturday.”
During a campaign visit to Johnstone’s Paints Limited in Batley, the prime minister told broadcasters: “I read the story on Friday and we’ve got a new health secretary in post on Saturday and I think that’s about the right pace to proceed in a pandemic.”
Your responses exemplify a new type of attack line which both parties use, but Labour at the moment more often, which seems to insult the intelligence of the British public.
Everyone who cares knows that on Friday they thought they could get away with it but by Saturday they knew they couldn't. Having determined Hancock would have to go, they decided to get it done quickly. Hence Boris' second comment.
Why make it so difficult? Just attack Boris for failing to sack Hancock on Friday. That's on him, having to wait until Saturday to realise the game was up.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
Can't see what difference it makes. Either sectarian campaigns are ok or they are not.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
I'd like someone to ask SKS what his policy is on India and Modi.
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
We had an interesting debate on here where @malcolmg was convinced that his pension would be paid by the English state. I think eventually he accepted that in the White Paper in 2014 that even the SNP acknowledged that continuing liability would run with the Scottish state and therefore be subject to their potential default. It doesn't seem to have changed his opinion yet on independence.
The argument about a central bank is one that has plagued the debate for a decade or more now. Nationalists frequently point out that they own a share of the BoE. Putting aside the technicalities of shareholding there is some merit in this argument since the BoE is there for all of the UK, despite its name.
The flaw is the failure to appreciate that a central bank is not an asset but a function or series of functions. Its ability to carry out those functions, such as regulation or being a lender of last resort, is contingent upon the legislative and fiscal support it receives from the government of the day. If Scotland goes independent it would no longer be underwriting those functions either legislatively or fiscally so it would have no say whatsoever in how these functions are operated. If, to take an example, a housing boom in the south of England results in higher interest rates and that causes a recession in Scotland that is just tough.
So we can continue to use Sterling but accept as a consequence that we have no say whatsoever on interest rate or monetary policy. If rUK chooses to debauch its currency with even more QE we simply have to accept the subsequent devaluation and inflation. It also means all our major financial institutions have to be registered in England to get LOLR protection with seriously adverse consequences to our tax base.
No 10 appears not to agree with PM on whether he sacked Matt Hancock. PM's official spokesman says: "No, the former Health Sec resigned". Adds: "They discussed it further on Saturday and the PM agreed with the former Health Sec that he was right to tender his resignation". https://twitter.com/PippaCrerar/status/1409492337798037505
Scotrail might do better to concentrate on providing a good rail service instead of showing off their virtue and looking ignorant and discriminatory to boot.
In what way are ScotRail discriminatory? Do you support the request for a "Straight Pride" train?
As I said, all this painting is silly. I would no more ask for this than to to go to the moon in a pea green boat. The customer making the request was being silly.
But they have taken a view without informing themselves and adopted a position which others might think discriminatory towards them eg by tweeting about gay and trans people being attacked without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened, in some cases by the very people Scotrail is praising.
Frankly it would be best if they didn't start mouthing off to customers in this way. It is not the job of a service provider to lecture a customer about politics. A polite "Our trains are for everyone all the time" would have made the point far better.
Yes all our trains are for everyone is a great slogan.
However, your conflating straight people being attacked with gay and trans people being attacked is straight out of the "what about male victims of female rape/why don't we have men's month/etc" playbook.
You all of a sudden put yourself in the same (pea green) boat as a bunch of super undesirables.
No it isn't. Those super-undesirables you refer to are lesbians and women being attacked for wanting equality. It is outrageous and may even be a criminal offence that a there are threats to murder a well know female writer on the streets of London, with no-one apparently battling an eyelid.
You misrepresenting what I say and making a vague accusation about undesirables is straight out of the playbook of men trying to shut women up when they don't like what they have to say.
I can’t be the only one who finds the idea of a gay train a bit, umm, Chris Morris….
Very funny. It's not a gay train, it's a train decked out to show support for an oft-oppressed minority.
It is also of course a marketing tool to position ScotRail as occupying a certain market position which they hope will be beneficial to them and their future revenue.
The furore over it seems a little ridiculous. Within a year they'll have taken the vinyls off and replaced them with something drab and ordinary.
Last year LNER renamed the Flying Scotsman the 'Flying Scotswoman' to mark International Women's Day. I see no reason why there should not be similar for another historically-maligned group such as homosexuals. Celebrating differences does not automatically denigrate those who are not 'different'.
Mr. Urquhart, if that's accurate then it's reckless reporting.
One might as well report that seatbelts don't guarantee survival in a car crash. True, but also ignores the critical point that they dramatically increase your chances.
FFS.....BBC headline...Double jabbed people can be infected - like Andrew Marr, says scientist
No shit sherlock. The point is it is a very small number and they won't suffer serious symptoms. Nobody claims even Pfizer is 100% against infection.
Marr described it as a "summer cold" and "very unpleasent" which says more about his (lack of) general immune system to my mind. He'd 100% be hospitalised without vaccination.
But given he’s suffered a stroke and a heart condition this surely shows the value of the vaccine. Statistically he’d be in a far worse position without one.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
Yes, I think he is. Look at what he's done/is doing re. Muslims in India.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
Worth pointing out that the term should be 'whitewashing' not 'white washing'. Having the 'white' seperate would, I think be another clear racist dog-whistke.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
And if Starmer were PM he would he refuse to meet the Indian PM
Labour have put themselves into a divisive and self inflicted furore
My local Tesco store that's just been built is now advertising "free" charging for Volkswagen vehicles with its chargers. That seems like an interesting partnership, though I've no idea how long it would last as "free".
As it says the chargers are VW-sponsored PodPoint units. Anyone with the app and a cable can use them for free.
How long will they remain free? Depends on who is paying the bill - the site or the network? If the site then I can see how free charging is a pull vs no / paid charging at a different supermarket. If the network then not for long!
Fun problem. So many of these 7kW units are let unmaintained and unloved after install. They get vandalised and broken and then its not owned by the site its located on and its not owned by the network logo on the post who just do the billing and it stays broken.
The manufacturers really need to get together to sort out the EV infrastructure problem.
SMMT and DfT need to bang heads together to get it working properly, the infrastructure issues are a major barrier to EV adoption. Only Tesla have done it right.
We ran a Leaf 2014 - 2017, I'm on my second PHEV and we've now got an Ioniq EV. Once you've had an electric drivetrain you never want to go back to a gearbox.
But - and its a big but - I am not going to rely on a charge network to get me anywhere, because there's no guarantee they will be delivering at the posted speed, available, or working at all. Add in the multiplicity of networks and batshit crazy "run a Roller for less" pricing and its game over.
Seriously looked at a Tesla twice now. The lack of an interior and horror show build quality out me off a 3 even before noting how small the thing is. Then a Polestar 2 until the reviews noted the awful inefficiency. Now waiting to see how the Ioniq 5 pans out.
We are going BMW i4 for Mrs DA's next car. She wouldn't entertain anything but a BEV now she's had one for a few years.
That’s something of a step down from a Taycan.
The Taycan is a great EV but not a great Porsche and she doesn't need anything so ludicrously fast. She also finds it too low. I'm going to buy the Taycan off the leasing company because it's a really good spec (White Turbo S with Mission E wheels and the 'vegan' interior with only 9,000 miles on it.)
All PMs say that when a minister resigns. Same as the whole letter writing nonsense, yes well I have to go, oh I am so sorry, you have been really good, I hope you can return soon....in time of Blair / Brown, it was often while doing a little dance about being able to get rid of a total shit (after they themselves placed the dirt in the papers).
Quite so. But do they also say "the PM has accepted his apology and the matter is closed" on numerous occasions during a Friday press briefing?
Yes.
Its the same as the Board of a Football Club giving the Manager a Vote of Confidence.
FFS.....BBC headline...Double jabbed people can be infected - like Andrew Marr, says scientist
No shit sherlock. The point is it is a very small number and they won't suffer serious symptoms. Nobody claims even Pfizer is 100% against infection. And two double jabbed people meeting one another, the chances of absolutely tiny and why it is sensible to be cautious out in general populous where the young are mostly single (or not) jabbed at the moment.
Is that really a headline? Downright irresponsible. I'm not sure how I would define a media responsibility, but 15 months into a pandemic given the impression it is a surprise people might still be infected despite a jab deels like something they should be more cautious about, since if it is a headline it makes it seem newsworthy, rather than, say, an answer to a question.
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
C'mon Carnyx. You really think a rUK Govt is going to subsidise the pensions of people who are citizens of what would be a foreign country? And whose own Govt has just spent years execrating the Govt of said rUK.
And for how long? And for how much?
And how long would rUK voters leave them in government if they tried?
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Circumstantial evidence. Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
I'd like someone to ask SKS what his policy is on India and Modi.
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
Well, there's many on here and elsewhere who say "how can you vote for SKS when he served in a notorious anti-semite's shadow cabinet"?
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
England has become a place where politics is decided by Asian religious factionalism - who would have thought it?! It was completely unpredictable. Why didn’t someone warn us this might happen?
Sir Keir is Jezza but uses Hindus instead of Jews
Come on, let's be fair. There's no way Starmer saw this leaflet before it was printed (and no reason why he should have) and he's probably livid about it. The issue is within the party - exposed and exacerbated by Galloway - not with the leader.
On a separate note, it is vitally important to Labour strategy that they reclassify Hindus as non-minorities ASAP. Sunak becoming PM gives them an almighty problem otherwise, as it makes many of their favourite attack lines look ridiculous. Javid becoming PM would have been much worse, strategically speaking, and I'm sure they aren't happy to see him back in frontline politics.
No 10 'completely refutes' the claim PM has behaved like a wonky shopping trolley. He was right not to sack Hancock on Friday and also right to accept his resignation the next day, etc https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/status/1409492054900629509
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
I'd like someone to ask SKS what his policy is on India and Modi.
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
I'd be thrilled if the Tories did that. They'd look ridiculous.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Circumstantial evidence. Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
"Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM". So it has nothing to do with it whatsoever?
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
To be honest I thought that article was a spoof ... they can't be serious, surely? Was it written as a GCSE-level thought experiment? Turning Scotland into Cuba sounds like a plan, eh? As you say David, scary ...
No 10 'completely refutes' the claim PM has behaved like a wonky shopping trolley. He was right not to sack Hancock on Friday and also right to accept his resignation the next day, etc https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/status/1409492054900629509
You really are silly and petty. It would be interesting to see the timeline of prior ministerial scandals and resignations down the years.
The scandal getting the scalp the next day seems to be remarkably fast to me, not the other way around. Under Blair these things tended to last about a week to ten days with the case being closed before the embroiled Minister would be out.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Circumstantial evidence. Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
"Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM". So it has nothing to do with it whatsoever?
It's fine for the British PM to meet with scumbags like Modi and Trump, that's part of the job. It's also fine for people to use photos of these meetings against them in election leaflets. It's all part of the rough and tumble of campaigning.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Circumstantial evidence. Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
"Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM". So it has nothing to do with it whatsoever?
It's fine for the British PM to meet with scumbags like Modi and Trump, that's part of the job. It's also fine for people to use photos of these meetings against them in election leaflets. It's all part of the rough and tumble of campaigning.
John Campbell was talking about transmission the other day before this kicked off. He was suggesting that previously nearly impossible to catch it outside and thought that normally you needed a certain amount of time in presence of the infected person to stand a chance of catching it.
Now, he was hypothesizing that Indian variant more than likely results in infected individuals exhausting a lot more virus and that you need to be exposed to less of it to become infected. Thus outside carries some risk and you might well not need to be in the presence of individuals for very long at all.
I read somewhere that in Australia so far with this outbreak (law of small numbers and all that) 100% of household transmission. Original variant, it was actually surprisingly low how much was transmitted even among those that lived with one another.
Amazing. Needless to say, I don't box against other people, I just take on a kind of heavy rocking dummy at my gym. But I'm unbeaten in 75 bouts.
Well they do say you can only beat what's in front of you...
And I have mentioned it on here before VR does a great boxing game - The Thrill of the Fight which is well worth giving a go (quite spenny headset - not for you, obvs) and really does work up a sweat.
They even have a virtual dummy of the type you are working out with.
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
No wonder they blacked out the text. The leaflet is about Islamophobia, and shows Boris Johnson meeting a notorious Islamophobe while pointing out the Tories' long history of Islaphobia, including Johnson's own comments. I think the leaflet is completely fine.
The leader of India is simply a "notorious Islamphobe" to you? 🤔
He is a notorious Islamophobe though. Take a look at his history going right back to the Ayodhya dispute right up to the latest laws that have been disenfranchising Muslims in India. He is an utterly loathsome bigot who is taking India down a very worrying path. He's not just another Indian politician.
So you are saying that a photo of Johnson meeting the Indian PM is evidence of Tory islamophobia?
Circumstantial evidence. Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
"Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM". So it has nothing to do with it whatsoever?
It's fine for the British PM to meet with scumbags like Modi and Trump, that's part of the job. It's also fine for people to use photos of these meetings against them in election leaflets. It's all part of the rough and tumble of campaigning.
"rough and tumble", is that what it is called?
I thought it was called racism.
Shame to see racists here supporting anti-Hindu xenophobia.
That article is one of the scariest things I have read in a long time. The capital flight from Scotland if this looks close to coming to pass would be irreparable. Our tax base could seriously collapse and the implied threat of stealing pensions to bank this madness will result in not only the money but many people leaving the country.
Leaving aside all the rest, I can see this one positively driving existing businesses away:
- A binding commitment on overseas companies under which they are obliged to offer first refusal to a management/worker takeover of a business in the event of the overseas owners deciding to close down production in Scotland. The commitment should also include a transfer or sharing of “intellectual property” (IP) such as product brands and patents.
The inevitable outcome if Scotland votes for independence will be slashed public spending in order to deal with the deficit. Tax rises would be suicidal as everyone significantly affected (high value individuals and business-owners) would simply hop over the border into the welcoming arms of rUK. This sort of madness, quoted above, would only accelerate the capital flight which would take place between the vote and actual independence.
(And, borrowing, of course, would hardly be an option.)
The Yes folk are really in a bind as IndyRef is impossible to win without persuading folk they will be better off. And its quite clear that the obvious would be the case, certainly for anyone dependent on the state to maintain their standard of living.
Quite a conundrum.
From my canvassing for BT, which was pretty extensive, I have no doubt at all that the biggest single issue resulting in the no vote was fear about what would happen to peoples' pensions. When you see the outriders of the Scottish government explaining that it will be the duty of pension fund managers to work constructively with the independent Scottish government to fund this brave new future I think that the independence referendum becomes unwinnable for yes. Its really not hard to sell the idea that these people want to steal your pension to fund their fantasy.
But this doesn't mean that having a government obsessed with independence, difference and making political points instead of running the country can't do a lot of damage anyway. They did in 2014 and they will again.
I think you need to bear in mind that the majority of pro-Indy voters believe that Scotland is a net financial contributor to UK.
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
The Whitehall Government was sending letters out to existing state pensioners in 2013-14 confirming that London would payt their state pension. (This is not, of course, relevant to new ones, or to private pensions.)
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
C'mon Carnyx. You really think a rUK Govt is going to subsidise the pensions of people who are citizens of what would be a foreign country? And whose own Govt has just spent years execrating the Govt of said rUK.
And for how long? And for how much?
I didn't say that. The Whitehall government did, at least for a while. (Which surprised me at the time, it must be said.)
Comments
FRI: PM: Accepts Hancock apology & says "I consider this matter closed"
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1409484794111660033
I think it shows Corbyn at al are more pro Muslim than anti Semitic, and Sir Keir’s lot are no different
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMdPj3HXMgQ
You said, apropos ScotRail specifically supporting trans and gay rights "...without also mentioning that straight people have been attacked or threatened..."
That is exactly of the type of comment similar to, usually men, bewailing the lack of white history month or who bemoan the lack of attention given to male victims of rape in response to an outcry or publicity over a woman who has been raped.
And the super-undesirables I referred to are certainly not lesbians and women being attacked. They are usually blokes and also usually white blokes.
"What do we want? (Derby built) Monorails!"
"Where do we want it?" Egypt!
https://www.mtdmfg.com/news/first-derby-built-cairo-monorail-trains-exported-to-egypt/
Sir Keir’s fan club are trying to defend the leaflet by saying the photo was doctored… here’s the original. How is it any better?
List it on Pistonheads, with a suitably sentimental narrative advert, and they might highlight it on their forum.
Very funny. It's not a gay train, it's a train decked out to show support for an oft-oppressed minority.
It is also of course a marketing tool to position ScotRail as occupying a certain market position which they hope will be beneficial to them and their future revenue.
Although, I do belive that plant was meant to close by now if we Brexited.
You've always wanted a W8, and it's the only one ever produced commercially ?
As an art installation ?
Malcolm Tucker : Seriously, the PM likes you personally. I like you personally, and we have absolutely no desire to get rid of you. I just want you to know that. None of this negative stuff is coming from us.
Cliff Lawton Matt Hancock : Oh, Mal, mate, that... makes a big difference, makes me feel a lot more secure.
Malcolm Tucker : Does it? Well, that's difficult.
Matt Hancock : What's difficult?
Malcolm Tucker : Just endless headlines, just endless, day after day, chipping away at your confidence.
Matt Hancock : Absolutely.
Malcolm Tucker : See, the thing is, that we're starting to look weak. Everyone say "When's he gonna go? When's he gonna go?".
Matt Hancock : Right...
Malcolm Tucker : And you don't want us to look weak, do you?
Matt Hancock : No, no...
Malcolm Tucker : So there you are. That's why you got to go.
Hancock: I am not resigning.
BoZo: Great.
...
Hancock: I have resigned.
BoZo: That's a shame.
...
BoZo: I sacked him...
Indeed.
https://twitter.com/godblesstofu/status/1409228335448793102?s=21
I saw correspondence in the local paper in which the Yes guy was arguing that the UK Govt would have a obligation to pay the state pension of people in Scotland after independence. Didn't seem to realise that there was no pension pot.
Likewise some saying that Indy Scotland can just keep on using the pound (which, kind of, they can) because its our currency just as much as England's. No conception of the significance of a central bank.
This is how SNP could win an independence referendum. Don't think they will. But they conceivably could if they are dishonest enough and the public credulous enough to believe them.
Media/MP babble, 89 Carrie texts p/hour
Trolley Sat, SMASH: Arghhh Matt go now you'll be back better stronger shortly matey forward to victory!
Trolley Mon, CRASH: when I saw the story on Fri we had a new SoS on Sat
https://twitter.com/Dominic2306/status/1409488850855071748
On Planet Earth, on Friday Boris supported Hancock's decision not to resign and didn't (or couldn't) sack him.
Then Hancock decided to resign, in the face of overwhelming criticism, and Boris now has to support that.
The situation is only back because of the substance of it, there is no second story about how it was announced.
I box, people might be surprised to learn.
Edit: the letters were sent to those who wrote in and asked. Not to all pensioners.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY1jzjTjIhY
Sir Keir is Jezza but uses Hindus instead of Jews
That is incredibly quick for how these stories go normally. You're scraping the barrel here.
Starmer and Ashworth need to be shown the poster and challenged on whether they condone it
Galloway has rightly been condemned for his divisive and gutter politics, but labour are now down there with him
"However, what is absolutely clear is that it will be the responsibility of an independent Scottish government, not the UK government, to make arrangement for pensions for citizens of an independent Scotland.
"There can be no guarantee that it will be at the same level as it is now."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-24286056
I guess you would also be comfortable with the Tories doing the same with Jews and having a picture of SKS with Jezza?
No shit sherlock. The point is it is a very small number and they won't suffer serious symptoms. Nobody claims even Pfizer is 100% against infection. And two double jabbed people meeting one another, the chances of absolutely tiny and why it is sensible to be cautious out in general populous where the young are mostly single (or not) jabbed at the moment.
Last year LNER renamed the Flying Scotsman the 'Flying Scotswoman' to mark International Women's Day. I see no reason why there should not be similar for another historically-maligned group such as homosexuals. Celebrating differences does not automatically denigrate those who are not 'different'.
As an aside, Eurostar have produced some (ahem) interesting liveries over the years:
https://variably.uk/2019/11/17/special-livery-eurostars/
Crystal clear and they cannot say they weren’t warned.
And for how long? And for how much?
Seems perfectly happy, if feeling a bit rough, in Durham, where it appears that 5/6ths of the university also has it.
Asked whether it undermined the message about being “all in it together”, Johnson said: “That’s right, and that’s why when I saw the story on Friday we had a new secretary of state for health in on Saturday.”
During a campaign visit to Johnstone’s Paints Limited in Batley, the prime minister told broadcasters: “I read the story on Friday and we’ve got a new health secretary in post on Saturday and I think that’s about the right pace to proceed in a pandemic.”
Your responses exemplify a new type of attack line which both parties use, but Labour at the moment more often, which seems to insult the intelligence of the British public.
Everyone who cares knows that on Friday they thought they could get away with it but by Saturday they knew they couldn't. Having determined Hancock would have to go, they decided to get it done quickly. Hence Boris' second comment.
Why make it so difficult? Just attack Boris for failing to sack Hancock on Friday. That's on him, having to wait until Saturday to realise the game was up.
https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1399345338343907329?s=20
The argument about a central bank is one that has plagued the debate for a decade or more now. Nationalists frequently point out that they own a share of the BoE. Putting aside the technicalities of shareholding there is some merit in this argument since the BoE is there for all of the UK, despite its name.
The flaw is the failure to appreciate that a central bank is not an asset but a function or series of functions. Its ability to carry out those functions, such as regulation or being a lender of last resort, is contingent upon the legislative and fiscal support it receives from the government of the day. If Scotland goes independent it would no longer be underwriting those functions either legislatively or fiscally so it would have no say whatsoever in how these functions are operated. If, to take an example, a housing boom in the south of England results in higher interest rates and that causes a recession in Scotland that is just tough.
So we can continue to use Sterling but accept as a consequence that we have no say whatsoever on interest rate or monetary policy. If rUK chooses to debauch its currency with even more QE we simply have to accept the subsequent devaluation and inflation. It also means all our major financial institutions have to be registered in England to get LOLR protection with seriously adverse consequences to our tax base.
Edit - Here....
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-national-surveillance-of-possible-covid-19-reinfection-published-by-phe
PM's official spokesman says: "No, the former Health Sec resigned".
Adds: "They discussed it further on Saturday and the PM agreed with the former Health Sec that he was right to tender his resignation".
https://twitter.com/PippaCrerar/status/1409492337798037505
Seems to be the bit that some people struggle with.
One might as well report that seatbelts don't guarantee survival in a car crash. True, but also ignores the critical point that they dramatically increase your chances.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-matt-hancock-personally-appointed-24413418?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar
No10 also confirms that Matt Hancock personally appointed lover Gina Coaldangelo as a non-executive director of the Department of Health
https://twitter.com/DavidTWilcock/status/1409492528479539204
But given he’s suffered a stroke and a heart condition this surely shows the value of the vaccine. Statistically he’d be in a far worse position without one.
Labour have put themselves into a divisive and self inflicted furore
Its the same as the Board of a Football Club giving the Manager a Vote of Confidence.
It's nonsense on stilts.....
Of course the UK PM is going to meet the Indian PM, and I'm not saying he shouldn't. But if you want to illustrate how the point the leaflet is making, showing the PM meeting a guy with Modi's history of discrimination and chauvinism against Muslims is probably as good a photo as any.
On a separate note, it is vitally important to Labour strategy that they reclassify Hindus as non-minorities ASAP. Sunak becoming PM gives them an almighty problem otherwise, as it makes many of their favourite attack lines look ridiculous. Javid becoming PM would have been much worse, strategically speaking, and I'm sure they aren't happy to see him back in frontline politics.
Get a shift on....
And no British PM should be shaking hands with him.
- The leader of Russia
- The leader of China
- The leader of Pakistan
- The leader of Saudi Arabia
?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9732481/Australias-Covid-success-crumbles-Cities-lockdown-borders-closed-hardly-vaccinations.html
The scandal getting the scalp the next day seems to be remarkably fast to me, not the other way around. Under Blair these things tended to last about a week to ten days with the case being closed before the embroiled Minister would be out.
Now, he was hypothesizing that Indian variant more than likely results in infected individuals exhausting a lot more virus and that you need to be exposed to less of it to become infected. Thus outside carries some risk and you might well not need to be in the presence of individuals for very long at all.
I read somewhere that in Australia so far with this outbreak (law of small numbers and all that) 100% of household transmission. Original variant, it was actually surprisingly low how much was transmitted even among those that lived with one another.
And I have mentioned it on here before VR does a great boxing game - The Thrill of the Fight which is well worth giving a go (quite spenny headset - not for you, obvs) and really does work up a sweat.
They even have a virtual dummy of the type you are working out with.
Shame to see racists here supporting anti-Hindu xenophobia.
https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1409495636928512002