Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
So does everyone ignore him after 20th Jan, and pretend he never happened, or do they keep him in the news every day for he next four years? I’m betting on the latter.
On topic: the UK political media are a bunch of utter morons, and have totally disgraced themselves over the last year.
They simply don’t understand their role in a pandemic, far too many people are paid to have an opinion, without any thought as to whether widespread broadcasting of those opinions has a negative impact on the spread of the pandemic.
They obsess about banal trivialities rather than asking sensible questions, are are way more concerned with tripping up politicians than eliciting information that can save lives.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
So does everyone ignore him after 20th Jan, and pretend he never happened, or do they keep him in the news every day for he next four years? I’m betting on the latter.
Definitely the latter. Criminal trials are always newsworthy.
Sort-of on topic, it's worth recalling that Private Eye for years promoted the MMR hoax of disgraced AntiVaxxer Andrew Wakefield. Their conspiracy laden drivel helped pedal his nonsense for a lot longer than might have been the case.
Meanwhile Wakefield, who is another loony narcissist, is making hay while the sun still shines in the US. He's gained traction with just the sort of Trumpites who lap up this stuff. Oh and Elle Macpherson, obvs.
the whole question of media regulation needs to be looked at again, with the aim of establishing a structure that promotes useful information and penalises misinformation. We’re not there yet, that’s for sure.
That’s likely to be a hard problem. For a start, who gets to define information/misinformation ? And to what media would such rules apply; what might be the sanctions etc ?
And with such a structure in place, how do you prevent government from using it to abridge free speech ?
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
I still can’t decide whether he’s likely to just fade away, or if the US descends into serious civil unrest. The former seems far more likely, but not inevitable.
the whole question of media regulation needs to be looked at again, with the aim of establishing a structure that promotes useful information and penalises misinformation. We’re not there yet, that’s for sure.
That’s likely to be a hard problem. For a start, who gets to define information/misinformation ? And to what media would such rules apply; what might be the sanctions etc ?
And with such a structure in place, how do you prevent government from using it to abridge free speech ?
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
I still can’t decide whether he’s likely to just fade away, or if the US descends into serious civil unrest. The former seems far more likely, but not inevitable.
I agree the former (in respect of political sway, anyhow). Americans will be surprisingly quick to drop him once he’s lost, and move on to the new fresh thing (worrying about what that might be is more pertinent). Indeed Trump’s antics can be seen as his knowing he’ll be dropped once he is seen as a loser, and his trying to keep the dream alive as long as he possibly can.
So the Cabinet are four square behind no deal (if Johnson judges it has to happen) because “the economic effect of COVID is really bad anyway”. As if somehow negative economic effects can’t compound each other. And as if it won’t hit really hard the sort of industries that are to a large extent shielded from (even in some cases benefitting from) COVID.
What a disastrous state this country is in, when virtually no decision is taken in the national interest, only a narrow (often completely ignorant) partisan calculation. And where all that matters is not the actual real world outcomes but “who can be given the blame”. (And you would have thought they might have learnt their lesson about blaming everything on “the intransigent French” after the Iraq war...)
I agree the former (in respect of political sway, anyhow). Americans will be surprisingly quick to drop him once he’s lost, and move on to the new fresh thing (worrying about what that might be is more pertinent). Indeed Trump’s antics can be seen as his knowing he’ll be dropped once he is seen as a loser, and his trying to keep the dream alive as long as he possibly can.
The problem for the GOP is if they win the runoffs, Trump will claim the credit
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
So does everyone ignore him after 20th Jan, and pretend he never happened, or do they keep him in the news every day for he next four years? I’m betting on the latter.
So...
I foolishly tried to engage some MAGAites on Twitter.
The issue was about postal votes and how she signatures didn't match, and there were all going to get thrown out, and therefore Trump would be handed the State by the courts.
First, I pointed out that - even if some votes were found to have been fraudulently cast - you couldn't know who they had been cast for.
Secondly, I pointed out that if 11% of postal votes were fraudulently cast, you didn't need "an audit", you just needed to speak to nine people who were supposed to have voted, so as to find the one who didn't.
And those people are publicly listed. It would literally take twenty minutes to find enough evidence of people who didn't actually vote.
I've deleted Twitter from my phone.
It's insane, and it's a testament to this site that - even when there are people one disagrees with - the arguments are normally civil and fact based.
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
That's not true.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
That's not true.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
Can I do a HYUFD and count radiation as an emission?
When all cars are electric surely it will be emitting close to zero tonnes of CO2.
Given that Dover won't be as busy after Brexit, why do we need a Lower Thames Crossing. Whenever I use it, the weight of traffic seems to be either going West, eventually or coming from the West.
When all cars are electric surely it will be emitting close to zero tonnes of CO2.
Given that Dover won't be as busy after Brexit, why do we need a Lower Thames Crossing. Whenever I use it, the weight of traffic seems to be either going West, eventually or coming from the West.
If you build the road there will be traffic. Just look at major cities in the US.
And are these projections for the use of Dover? I thought the waiting period might be longer, but a significant reduction in traffic?
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
That's not true.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
Can I do a HYUFD and count radiation as an emission?
Sure you can...
But only if you want me to point out that (over sufficiently long timespans) coal, gas and oil are renewable too.
very surprised that the media portrays BJ as trying to unblock the BREXIT talks logjam....his track record on sealing a watertight deal with Europe can hardly be held up as credible. It'll be interesting to see how the blame game pans out....
When you have a government whose core project is the result of misinformation and badmouthing experts I wouldn't hold your breath for this situation to improve. Personally I think there is a case for wartime style censorship in a situation as serious as a pandemic. Careless talk costs lives. Although perhaps that would be counterproductive these days, it might simply fuel the conspiracy theories.
very surprised that the media portrays BJ as trying to unblock the BREXIT talks logjam....his track record on sealing a watertight deal with Europe can hardly be held up as credible. It'll be interesting to see how the blame game pans out....
It’s all over. The Govt weren’t sure if they could get away with “blaming the EU”. But now they can specifically blame the French they won’t give it a second thought.
I still can’t decide whether he’s likely to just fade away, or if the US descends into serious civil unrest.
He'll definitely run in 2024. Why wouldn't he? Because he suddenly develops a distaste for power, wealth and other people's money? He will start campaigning for MAGA2024 on 20/1/21. The rest of the quasi-fascists and bible wankers in the GOP can do nothing to stop him.
He'll probably win as he'll either be up against whatever is left of Biden's brain in a jar hooked up to a car battery and Hunter's laptop or Kamala Harris.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
Which is why some sort of agreement to effectively continue the current arrangements, at least for trade and any other matters so far unresolved, for a few more months, would now politically be very sensible.
The extent of our unpreparedness for something that has been four and a half years coming is truly staggering.
Terrible though it is, part of me wants to think it's only right that there should be no deal, so that the real consequences can be displayed for all to see. Except I know that for the extreme Brexit loonies there will always be someone else to blame for the consequences of their own folly. (Cf. D. J. Trump, Jr, and his - still unbelievably extant - fans.)
And a lot of the people who will suffer would be more accurately classified as their victims. And also a lot of people will suffer who could see all along what lunacy it was, because in this world there's a limit to how far you can protect yourself against other people's stupidity.
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
That's not true.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
Can I do a HYUFD and count radiation as an emission?
Sure you can...
But only if you want me to point out that (over sufficiently long timespans) coal, gas and oil are renewable too.
Really? I thought they were created by one-off geological events, but I know little about it and I could easily be wrong.
Trump's Georgia rally is near-disastrous for the GOP run-offs. Instead of focusing on the two Republican candidates he has launched a vitriolic attack on Governor Brian Kemp, pressuring him to call a special session and convince state legislators to select their own electors that would support him, according to a Washington Post source. He also asked the Republican governor to order an audit of absentee ballot signatures
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Trump is quite mad. And his madness is incredibly corrosive to democracy in America.
So does everyone ignore him after 20th Jan, and pretend he never happened, or do they keep him in the news every day for he next four years? I’m betting on the latter.
So...
I foolishly tried to engage some MAGAites on Twitter.
The issue was about postal votes and how she signatures didn't match, and there were all going to get thrown out, and therefore Trump would be handed the State by the courts.
First, I pointed out that - even if some votes were found to have been fraudulently cast - you couldn't know who they had been cast for.
Secondly, I pointed out that if 11% of postal votes were fraudulently cast, you didn't need "an audit", you just needed to speak to nine people who were supposed to have voted, so as to find the one who didn't.
And those people are publicly listed. It would literally take twenty minutes to find enough evidence of people who didn't actually vote.
I've deleted Twitter from my phone.
It's insane, and it's a testament to this site that - even when there are people one disagrees with - the arguments are normally civil and fact based.
There are millions of idiots on social media, and the platform is designed to amplify fringe conspiracy theories and generate negative emotion - which drives ‘engagement’.
A huge problem of modern TV media, as dicussed in the header, is that everyone involved is obsessed by what’s trending on Twitter. David Cameron was right about it.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
Which is why some sort of agreement to effectively continue the current arrangements, at least for trade and any other matters so far unresolved, for a few more months, would now politically be very sensible.
The extent of our unpreparedness for something that has been four and a half years coming is truly staggering.
There were signs in some of the quotes in the press last week that the Govt were actually preparing to blame U.K. businesses for not preparing sufficiently. (particularly those involved in food supplies for which it appears the Govt takes no responsibility and has no emergency plans whatsoever). Because they hadn’t done enough to make a success of this “shared national endeavour”, and had relied too much on wishful thinking of end state trading scenarios.
An excellent thread header. Personally I'm not all that bothered about the internet. I think, understandably, people like us overestimate the importance of the internet. My parents wouldn't have a clue about the stuff written on the internet if it wasn't for the TV media repeating the nonsense. Quite simply, the mainstream media should not be talking about concerns about vaccines. They shouldn't even be asking questions about how the government intends to get people to have the jab - simply asking that question suggests to the audience that perhaps they ought to be worried. They shouldn't. And they certainly shouldn't have repeated the claims from Dr Fauci (I know he's apologised, but it just smacks of the media enjoying the confrontation, which is not what's needed right now).
but there is plenty of evidence that talk about suicide acts as a cue in the suggestible.
Absolutely. I went to a conference on suicide at Network Rail a few years ago. One of the presenters explained how they'd tried to persuade Coronation Street to not do the Hayley Cropper suicide story. They weren't successful in getting it stopped, but they managed to convince the producers to limit what they showed. Also, did you know that there was a spike in suicides when Robin Williams took his own life?
This should apply post-COVID. We need the media to STOP TALKING ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH. It makes things worse, not better.
Interesting. They've got a battle on. Anti-roads people dressing up in Lincoln Green costumes.
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
Of course, ZEV are only zero emissions if they are charged using renewable sources of power.
That's not true.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
Nuclear is very far from zero waste. As your great great great great great great great great grandkids will still be attesting.
It's also Zero Emission - until it spectacularly isn't.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
F1: backed Sainz to be top 6 at 2.8. He's achieved that in 4/5 recent races, and was a tenth off top 6 pace in qualifying. Reckon he has a decent shot.
As an aside, also done a little bit more hedging on Bottas/Verstappen. I'm ahead on the win market whatever happens now.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
Terrible though it is, part of me wants to think it's only right that there should be no deal, so that the real consequences can be displayed for all to see. Except I know that for the extreme Brexit loonies there will always be someone else to blame for the consequences of their own folly. (Cf. D. J. Trump, Jr, and his - still unbelievably extant - fans.)
And a lot of the people who will suffer would be more accurately classified as their victims. And also a lot of people will suffer who could see all along what lunacy it was, because in this world there's a limit to how far you can protect yourself against other people's stupidity.
I hope there will be a deal. It's not only about the immediate consequences, it's about what a failure will mean for the future existence of the UK, how we are perceived internationally and the long term harm that will do us.
Whatever happens we are going to be poorer, less free, less united and more peripheral, but without a deal it will be so much worse. The problem is that I just do not see how one can be done as there is no deal that will satisfy the people whose political acquiescence (the ERG) or irrelevance (Farage) Johnson needs to stay in power. And given that Johnson will always put his own interests first, how can he sign up to anything that will inevitably cause apoplexy among both groups - small as they are in the great scheme of things?
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
Which is why some sort of agreement to effectively continue the current arrangements, at least for trade and any other matters so far unresolved, for a few more months, would now politically be very sensible.
The extent of our unpreparedness for something that has been four and a half years coming is truly staggering.
There were signs in some of the quotes in the press last week that the Govt were actually preparing to blame U.K. businesses for not preparing sufficiently. (particularly those involved in food supplies for which it appears the Govt takes no responsibility and has no emergency plans whatsoever). Because they hadn’t done enough to make a success of this “shared national endeavour”, and had relied too much on wishful thinking of end state trading scenarios.
What we know is that whatever happens the government will never take situation for a state of affairs caused solely by decisions it has taken.
It was one of those evil genius lines- it could easily be heard as meaning an end state deal, even if that was never said.
Except here he is referring to the WA, not the FTA.
Which he’s a) repudiated and b) was front and centre of an election campaign to “get Brexit Done”. Which is technically true, but people are going to get a shock in January.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Wasn't he referring to the withdrawal agreement?
Have to remember that this time last year we were still electing a Parliament needed to weed out the Wollastons and the Grieves that could actually pass a Brexit Bill. Which didn't get the Royal Assent until 23rd January this year.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
Watching MOTD repeat and thinking about the debate concerning heading the ball and long-term brain injury. I think if they banned heading outside the penalty areas it would cut the number of headers a lot and might even make for a better game.
Anecdote time. My dad hasn't been especially well this year. Last week he managed to do a hernia. Anyway, he went to see his GP who sent him off to the hospital. He spent most of Wednesday afternoon in outpatients as the doctors there examined him. He went back on Thursday - and spent all day there - before they decided that he needed surgery, which they'd do on Saturday once he'd been off some pills. Great, we thought, they're not messing around. Anyway, he goes back for one last check on Friday. This time, a doctor who he had not seen at all up to this point examines him and decides that actually, it's not that bad, we don't need to operate. Go home and let us know if you're in any pain.
My dad's observation about the hospital was that, whilst most - but certainly not all - staff were wearing masks and temperatures were being checked, they seemed rather relaxed about COVID. It seems beyond bizarre that they went through to all that effort only to have someone (presumably more senior) veto surgery. I've been concerned about COVID preventing other stuff being done by the NHS. But what my dad went through shocked me. Surely you get the key decision maker involved straight away so that you don't waste time and increase risks of COVID being spread.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
The point i was making is not that it is difficult, or that there is any risk to being able to get vaccine supplies into the country. It is the fact that this reassurance is needing to be offered at all.
It was one of those evil genius lines- it could easily be heard as meaning an end state deal, even if that was never said.
Except here he is referring to the WA, not the FTA.
Which he’s a) repudiated and b) was front and centre of an election campaign to “get Brexit Done”. Which is technically true, but people are going to get a shock in January.
I'm not disputing that, but it's just false to claim the "oven ready deal" refers to the FTA.
The problem is that I just do not see how one can be done as there is no deal that will satisfy the people whose political acquiescence (the ERG) or irrelevance (Farage) Johnson needs to stay in power. And given that Johnson will always put his own interests first, how can he sign up to anything that will inevitably cause apoplexy among both groups - small as they are in the great scheme of things?
All of this is true, but how vocal are they going to be in support when the reality of No Deal bites?
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Wasn't he referring to the withdrawal agreement?
Have to remember that this time last year we were still electing a Parliament needed to weed out the Wollastons and the Grieves that could actually pass a Brexit Bill. Which didn't get the Royal Assent until 23rd January this year.
And even more impressively, Johnson has tried to repeal it before it even comes into force.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
I reckon we could get our current 2020 allocation in a single flight. Here by lunchtime....
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
I reckon we could get our current 2020 allocation in a single flight. Here by lunchtime....
Anecdote time. My dad hasn't been especially well this year. Last week he managed to do a hernia. Anyway, he went to see his GP who sent him off to the hospital. He spent most of Wednesday afternoon in outpatients as the doctors there examined him. He went back on Thursday - and spent all day there - before they decided that he needed surgery, which they'd do on Saturday once he'd been off some pills. Great, we thought, they're not messing around. Anyway, he goes back for one last check on Friday. This time, a doctor who he had not seen at all up to this point examines him and decides that actually, it's not that bad, we don't need to operate. Go home and let us know if you're in any pain.
My dad's observation about the hospital was that, whilst most - but certainly not all - staff were wearing masks and temperatures were being checked, they seemed rather relaxed about COVID. It seems beyond bizarre that they went through to all that effort only to have someone (presumably more senior) veto surgery. I've been concerned about COVID preventing other stuff being done by the NHS. But what my dad went through shocked me. Surely you get the key decision maker involved straight away so that you don't waste time and increase risks of COVID being spread.
Sorry to hear about your dad. Sounds a bit of a shambles.
But while @Foxy would know more than me, friends in the NHS are saying what’s causing major problems is not the infections but the isolating contacts (as it is in schools). That may be why they tried to hold the senior person back to the last minute.
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
Crab Air is grossly unsuited to cargo operator style 24x7 ops. They would run out of crews quite quickly. That's not say they couldn't help as the big advantage of C-17/A400/C-130 ops is not that they add capacity but they don't need any specific equipment to load/unload except a few fat lads with their arse cracks showing.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
I reckon we could get our current 2020 allocation in a single flight. Here by lunchtime....
Eggs and basket come to mind.
Alternatively, send a thousand guys with pizza delivery bikes.....
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
The point i was making is not that it is difficult, or that there is any risk to being able to get vaccine supplies into the country. It is the fact that this reassurance is needing to be offered at all.
The reassurance is needed, because certain parts of the political media spent last week positively relishing the idea that vaccines would get stuck in transit.
The problem is that I just do not see how one can be done as there is no deal that will satisfy the people whose political acquiescence (the ERG) or irrelevance (Farage) Johnson needs to stay in power. And given that Johnson will always put his own interests first, how can he sign up to anything that will inevitably cause apoplexy among both groups - small as they are in the great scheme of things?
All of this is true, but how vocal are they going to be in support when the reality of No Deal bites?
Obviously, they will take no responsibility whatsoever and will blame everyone but themselves - but they will kick up a huge fuss if Johnson then seeks a deal with Brussels.
The clown’s problem is that he has spent his political capital and blown his credibility just before the main event for which he always needed them.
But the cabinet of useless sycophants are totally behind him...
If you remember, this time last year our PM was going round the country talking about an oven-ready deal which he only had to pop in the microwave.
Edit; FFS.
Part of the additional problem is that without some sort of transition, almost all the chaos of no-deal will happen under a deal scenario anyway. So they’ll decide politically, why bother with the latter?
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
That's another one of those 'bullshitters bullshitting' headlines.
Headline: "Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story There is a contingency plan.
And how many flights will it take to fly in those "pizza boxes", each with 950 doses per box? A pallet 10 x 10 x 20 of such boxes is 1.9 million doses....
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
I reckon we could get our current 2020 allocation in a single flight. Here by lunchtime....
Eggs and basket come to mind.
Alternatively, send a thousand guys with pizza delivery bikes.....
Great idea. Select any who have willingly delivered a pizza with pineapple on it.
There would be a brief Churchillan moment, before Britain's no-deal Brexit preparations began to look like Enver Hoxha's mini-bunkers he peppered the landscape with, and the reality of Britain having a similar trading status to Albania with the rest of Europe started to become obvious.
Like the story of someone willing to have sex for £1M, but not for £5, the principle of allowing EU boats to fish in UK waters has been conceded, we are just haggling over the price...
I still struggle somewhat to comprehend how the Govt reconciles needing to be able to apportion blame with their simultaneous claims that no deal (“Australia deal”) will be an excellent outcome for the country. Why would you need to find blame for an excellent outcome?
Or are they going to accuse somebody of sabotaging the Australia deal?
There would be a brief Churchillan moment, before Britain's no-deal Brexit preparations began to look like Enver Hoxha's mini-bunkers he peppered the landscape with, and the reality of Britain having a similar trading status to Albania with the rest of Europe started to become obvious.
Yep - blaming the French gets you through a few news cycles, but then what? We have been told that no deal is no problem and that the UK will thrive mightily without one. There will need to be delivery on that.
The problem is that I just do not see how one can be done as there is no deal that will satisfy the people whose political acquiescence (the ERG) or irrelevance (Farage) Johnson needs to stay in power. And given that Johnson will always put his own interests first, how can he sign up to anything that will inevitably cause apoplexy among both groups - small as they are in the great scheme of things?
All of this is true, but how vocal are they going to be in support when the reality of No Deal bites?
Obviously, they will take no responsibility whatsoever and will blame everyone but themselves - but they will kick up a huge fuss if Johnson then seeks a deal with Brussels.
They will say the Govt preparation has been undermined by the Remainers in the Civil Service.
Watching MOTD repeat and thinking about the debate concerning heading the ball and long-term brain injury. I think if they banned heading outside the penalty areas it would cut the number of headers a lot and might even make for a better game.
Trouble is there is probably a lot more heading during practice rather than playing.
A single C-17 has a cargo area 27m x 5.5m x 3.75m high, and has a max load of 77,500kg.
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
Crab Air is grossly unsuited to cargo operator style 24x7 ops. They would run out of crews quite quickly. That's not say they couldn't help as the big advantage of C-17/A400/C-130 ops is not that they add capacity but they don't need any specific equipment to load/unload except a few fat lads with their arse cracks showing.
How many crews would they need? What do Crab Air’s flight time timitations look like?
In civvy street they have around five crews per airframe, with FTLs of 100hr/month and 900hr/year.
Like the story of someone willing to have sex for £1M, but not for £5, the principle of allowing EU boats to fish in UK waters has been conceded, we are just haggling over the price...
This would be necessary to some extent anyway, because existing supply chain can hardly be suspended and reconfigured overnight on 1st January creating massive shortages
Watching MOTD repeat and thinking about the debate concerning heading the ball and long-term brain injury. I think if they banned heading outside the penalty areas it would cut the number of headers a lot and might even make for a better game.
Trouble is there is probably a lot more heading during practice rather than playing.
My local team have (or had when I was last able to watch them) a predilection for booting the ball high up field and trying to head it on. Seemed to be common practice in their league. Just hoping that by early/mid Jan, when my vaccination course is completed, I'll be able to go and see them again.
Comments
Then, at the rally, he went on another of his narcissistic tantrum rants.
I'm beginning to dare to hope that the Democrats might just win both run-offs. Early voting begins a week tomorrow.
Climate change: Lower Thames Crossing CO2 impact figures revealed
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-55202801
They simply don’t understand their role in a pandemic, far too many people are paid to have an opinion, without any thought as to whether widespread broadcasting of those opinions has a negative impact on the spread of the pandemic.
They obsess about banal trivialities rather than asking sensible questions, are are way more concerned with tripping up politicians than eliciting information that can save lives.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2010/feb/05/private-eye-magazines
Meanwhile Wakefield, who is another loony narcissist, is making hay while the sun still shines in the US. He's gained traction with just the sort of Trumpites who lap up this stuff. Oh and Elle Macpherson, obvs.
That’s likely to be a hard problem.
For a start, who gets to define information/misinformation ? And to what media would such rules apply; what might be the sanctions etc ?
And with such a structure in place, how do you prevent government from using it to abridge free speech ?
That’s obvious now - would you have been able to say so back in the summer under Alastair’s proposed regime ?
The assessment doesn't seem to take into account either savings from reductions of congestion elsewhere, or the increase in ZEV - traffic emissions count for more than half of it and we will be overwhelmingly ZEV for perhaps 45-50 years of the 60 year calculated period.
One of a smallish number of BBC stories where I have seen a link direct to What Do They Know.
What a disastrous state this country is in, when virtually no decision is taken in the national interest, only a narrow (often completely ignorant) partisan calculation. And where all that matters is not the actual real world outcomes but “who can be given the blame”. (And you would have thought they might have learnt their lesson about blaming everything on “the intransigent French” after the Iraq war...)
I foolishly tried to engage some MAGAites on Twitter.
The issue was about postal votes and how she signatures didn't match, and there were all going to get thrown out, and therefore Trump would be handed the State by the courts.
First, I pointed out that - even if some votes were found to have been fraudulently cast - you couldn't know who they had been cast for.
Secondly, I pointed out that if 11% of postal votes were fraudulently cast, you didn't need "an audit", you just needed to speak to nine people who were supposed to have voted, so as to find the one who didn't.
And those people are publicly listed. It would literally take twenty minutes to find enough evidence of people who didn't actually vote.
I've deleted Twitter from my phone.
It's insane, and it's a testament to this site that - even when there are people one disagrees with - the arguments are normally civil and fact based.
Nuclear is not renewable, and is Zero Emission.
There are also times when it's more efficient for the grid to generate power than not.
F1: race looks intriguing all through the points position. May make tipping tricky. Time to find out...
And are these projections for the use of Dover? I thought the waiting period might be longer, but a significant reduction in traffic?
But only if you want me to point out that (over sufficiently long timespans) coal, gas and oil are renewable too.
Uranium mining is CO2 intensive, as is construction.
Edit; FFS.
Concrete for wind turbines? Steel? Purifying silicon?
He'll probably win as he'll either be up against whatever is left of Biden's brain in a jar hooked up to a car battery and Hunter's laptop or Kamala Harris.
You would have thought that the headlines about the military flying in vaccine supplies to get round the border problems would have made them question what they were doing. That such a thing would be necessary. There is no situation where needing to rely on the military should be seen as a “good news story”. Relying on the military for civilian roles is about the biggest admission/evidence of the failure of the state that you can get. It’s no surprise it’s been cited as a potential backstop so often in recent years.
One thing that will be amusing amid the madness is how they will explain away the fish shortages.
The extent of our unpreparedness for something that has been four and a half years coming is truly staggering.
The legal troubles will only burnish his credentials as a righteous man beset on all sides in the addled eyes of the Maga Army.
Especially as he’s now repudiated the WA anyway.
And a lot of the people who will suffer would be more accurately classified as their victims. And also a lot of people will suffer who could see all along what lunacy it was, because in this world there's a limit to how far you can protect yourself against other people's stupidity.
A huge problem of modern TV media, as dicussed in the header, is that everyone involved is obsessed by what’s trending on Twitter. David Cameron was right about it.
Headline:
"Military planes to fly vaccines in to Britain to avoid ports hit by Brexit"
Reality once you read the story
There is a contingency plan.
but there is plenty of evidence that talk about suicide acts as a cue in the suggestible.
Absolutely. I went to a conference on suicide at Network Rail a few years ago. One of the presenters explained how they'd tried to persuade Coronation Street to not do the Hayley Cropper suicide story. They weren't successful in getting it stopped, but they managed to convince the producers to limit what they showed. Also, did you know that there was a spike in suicides when Robin Williams took his own life?
This should apply post-COVID. We need the media to STOP TALKING ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH. It makes things worse, not better.
It's also Zero Emission - until it spectacularly isn't.
*Chernobyl and Fukushima wave*
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/11/05/deal-oven-ready-get-brexit-done-take-country-forward/
Betting Post
F1: backed Sainz to be top 6 at 2.8. He's achieved that in 4/5 recent races, and was a tenth off top 6 pace in qualifying. Reckon he has a decent shot.
As an aside, also done a little bit more hedging on Bottas/Verstappen. I'm ahead on the win market whatever happens now.
Pre-race ramble here:
https://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2020/12/sakhir-pre-race-2020.html
Whatever happens we are going to be poorer, less free, less united and more peripheral, but without a deal it will be so much worse. The problem is that I just do not see how one can be done as there is no deal that will satisfy the people whose political acquiescence (the ERG) or irrelevance (Farage) Johnson needs to stay in power. And given that Johnson will always put his own interests first, how can he sign up to anything that will inevitably cause apoplexy among both groups - small as they are in the great scheme of things?
You’d probably do it with one plane in less than a week.
My dad's observation about the hospital was that, whilst most - but certainly not all - staff were wearing masks and temperatures were being checked, they seemed rather relaxed about COVID. It seems beyond bizarre that they went through to all that effort only to have someone (presumably more senior) veto surgery. I've been concerned about COVID preventing other stuff being done by the NHS. But what my dad went through shocked me. Surely you get the key decision maker involved straight away so that you don't waste time and increase risks of COVID being spread.
Bozo seems more interested in finding someone to blame than actually getting a deal .
But while @Foxy would know more than me, friends in the NHS are saying what’s causing major problems is not the infections but the isolating contacts (as it is in schools). That may be why they tried to hold the senior person back to the last minute.
Current Betfair prices:-
Biden 1.03
Democrats 1.03
Biden PV 1.02
Biden PV 49-51.9% 1.03
Trump PV 46-48.9% 1.03
Trump ECV 210-239 1.06
Biden ECV 300-329 1.06
Biden ECV Hcap -48.5 1.05
Biden ECV Hcap -63.5 1.05
Trump ECV Hcap +81.5 no offers
AZ Dem 1.05
GA Dem 1.05
MI Dem 1.03
NV Dem 1.04
PA Dem 1.03
WI Dem 1.04
Trump to leave before end of term NO 1.11
Trump exit date 2021 1.06
Then again, if you sufficient have surplus electricity, you can use it to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere.
I have a conspiracy theorist amongst my outer Facebook circle now (for the first time), though more of the Ga-Ga-Glastonbury variety.
Like the story of someone willing to have sex for £1M, but not for £5, the principle of allowing EU boats to fish in UK waters has been conceded, we are just haggling over the price...
Or are they going to accuse somebody of sabotaging the Australia deal?
In civvy street they have around five crews per airframe, with FTLs of 100hr/month and 900hr/year.
Just hoping that by early/mid Jan, when my vaccination course is completed, I'll be able to go and see them again.