Remarkable degree of consensus in that poll, especially the party and Brexit cross-tabs. Johnson is in a bind now having been so aggressively dismissive of Starmer's suggestion.
Let me repeat for those unaware: The North East has already been in “Tier 2” for a month. We should already have the data on its effect on case numbers.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Would be interesting to ask people as well how bad they think COVID rates are in comparison to March and especially in their own area. I have a feeling many people will have an incorrect assessment.
Almost 20,000 o_O. Not great when wednesday is higher than tuesday
It's still a slowing down of the case growth rate. My eye spies an 11 day doubling time, maybe just under that, last week it was just under 9 days. We're not very far from equilibrium and the new tier system has just come into place.
Absolutely 100% agreed. And the Freshers Flu (Covid19 edition) effect will burn out soon.
I think the latter will need a couple of extra weeks until it starts to burn out, but even with that we are approaching equilibrium without that effect.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
Again this morning, head of the vaccine task force said we ain't getting nought until next year, and for the plebs it is more like another year before any of the restrictions can go away.
I wholeheartedly supported the first lockdown (indeed I thought it came later than it ought), as it gave us time to work out answers, and lasted long enough to get rates of infection low enough to give us more time after if was relaxed.
We appear not to have spent that time terrifically well.
As far as the proposed circuit breaker is concerned, other than give us a couple of weeks' pause, I don't have an answer to Cyclefree's questions.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
Again this morning, head of the vaccine task force said we ain't getting nought until next year, and for the plebs it is more like another year before any of the restrictions can go away.
Do they have estimates for the timeframe for the vaccination program once it is approved? I wonder how many people they can do a day.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
If you work in the public sector, or are on a pension, the COVID impact is either zero or maybe positive because you are working from home.
That's a massive chunk of the population.
The impact of COVID is being felt extremely unevenly. One thing the government must do is spread the load. I wonder what that poll would look like if Sunak announced a 5% across the board cut in pension payments.
I reckon you could turn that poll on its head, effectively.
Let me repeat for those unaware: The North East has already been in “Tier 2” for a month. We should already have the data on its effect on case numbers.
We probably need to compare the North East with Teesside to see what the difference was. without looking I suspect there isn't much difference between how the NE has done in Tier 2 to how Teesside (which was in tier 1) has done.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
Almost 20,000 o_O. Not great when wednesday is higher than tuesday
It's still a slowing down of the case growth rate. My eye spies an 11 day doubling time, maybe just under that, last week it was just under 9 days. We're not very far from equilibrium and the new tier system has just come into place.
Stop repeating this nonsense. The North East has been in “Tier 2” for a month already. We already have the data on whether Tier 2 is sufficient, although clearly not Tier 3.
I don’t know the answer to that question, but the data is there.
I think it's actually encouraging that we're seeing a slowing of the growth rate in cases in the current circumstances without tougher measures like the tier 3 restrictions. It shows that there is still slack in the system to put tough measures in place where they are needed rather than pulling the big lever of national lockdown.
Let me repeat for those unaware: The North East has already been in “Tier 2” for a month. We should already have the data on its effect on case numbers.
Let me repeat for those unaware: The North East has already been in “Tier 2” for a month. We should already have the data on its effect on case numbers.
What makes you think a month is long enough to judge?
Especially when that month coincided with the explosion in student infections?
This is why its farcical to suggest that 2 weeks would work. Even a month isn't long enough to tell if its working meaningfully yet or not, absolutely no way to tell within 2 weeks.
Cyclefree said: "The politicians and others advocating more restrictions do have answers to these questions, don’t they?"
Answers? To paraphrase Mel Brooks, "We don't need no stinking answers"
The importance of this announcement at this point in time is to divert attention from the clusterf**k about to happen tomorrow and Friday.
Far, far better to have the country up in arms over Covid than Brexit. Quelle coincidence that the announcements happen a couple of days before we realise that a complete capitulation by Boris is on the cards...
I wholeheartedly supported the first lockdown (indeed I thought it came later than it ought), as it gave us time to work out answers, and lasted long enough to get rates of infection low enough to give us more time after if was relaxed.
We appear not to have spent that time terrifically well.
As far as the proposed circuit breaker is concerned, other than give us a couple of weeks' pause, I don't have an answer to Cyclefree's questions.
I think that is being a bit harsh. If the announcements are to be believed we now have things like 4 months of PPE supply. Testing capacity is 350k and still increasing. We do have an app, but it is massively limited by what Apple / Google allow.
I think part of the problem is the government have oversold so many things e.g. get an antibody test and you will have an immunity passport, track and trace will be able to hunt down all the outbreaks, we will have an app that will definitely tell you if you were near a positive person, etc.
Realistically, track and trace didn't even work that well when cases where just in the handfuls, because it is too slow a process to do it manually.
The reality from the start, which initially the likes of Witty stated, this will be with us for several years and we will have to live with it.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
The premise to the questions is wrong, we shouldnt be expecting clear answers in a world of great uncertainty. That is not the fault of the scientists or the government, it is the nature of this virus and its relationship with the world.
However vague unclear answers below:
1,2,3 - 2-3 weeks is a circuit breaker, longer is a lockdown. A circuit breaker moves the infected numbers back a few weeks in time allowing either slightly looser restrictions or fewer deaths over the following few months, possibly a combination. It does not give a long term solution and no-one is saying it will do.
4 - We will be in a similar place as we are today, but a better place than we would be in a months time without the breaker.
5 - This is the interesting and difficult question. The govt has so far eventually delivered a reasonable and fair support across the country. Business liquidations were actually down for the year to July for example which is remarkable. They only did so under media pressure and are trying to reduce the level of state support, so who knows? Realistically I would assume support is somewhere halfway between what is currently promised (not enough) and what we had over the summer (enough for most).
I wonder if the general tone of the news coverage over the last week will have an effect on case numbers. That itself might cause slight reduction in household mixing.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
My gut is that two more tiers will be added:
4) All but essential retail, schools and unis closed. Building sites and online continues to operate (as per March lockdown)
5) Schools and unis closed. Just essential retail left. Can't leave your county except for work etc.
Because it makes NO sense to go from a lOCAL tier 3, which is still quite a soft lockdown, to NATIONWIDE lockdown. It hurts Winchester to slowly help Wigan....
He's such a moron, with an inflated view of his own importance. There would be more funerals, more in intensive care and less doctors available due to dealing with Covid. I distrust anyone giving out medical advice that doesn't have a background in medicine.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
If you work in the public sector, or are on a pension, the COVID impact is either zero or maybe positive because you are working from home.
That's a massive chunk of the population.
The impact of COVID is being felt extremely unevenly. One thing the government must do is spread the load. I wonder what that poll would look like if Sunak announced a 5% across the board cut in pension payments.
I reckon you could turn that poll on its head, effectively.
I work in the private sector, financially it's been huge positive working from home, I'm saving £650 a month on train tickets, maybe £200 a month on eating out for lunch, and I've not bought any work related clothes since March.
That 5% cut will have no impact on me, my colleagues have similar positives.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Excellent post by Cyclefree. So good in fact, that if I were Boris I would cut and paste it straight into an open letter to Sir Keir Starmer. As Sir Keir is the proposer of the circuit breaker I assume he already knows the answers to Cyclefree's questions.
Have we given up on testing, tracing and isolating then?
I don't think the rhetoric has been given up but the practice perhaps so.
I wonder how people would react to a draconian track & trace and then opening up the economy to a significant extent.
Would please both "sides" potentially. OK you can go and party but if you all catch the pox then you are indoors on your own for 14 days at peril of a £XX,000 fine.
Also, 100% agreed Cyclefree. None of this has been answered by anyone who supports this policy. Even the scientists just say "yeah but it brings the R down", but in an environment where there is no short term resolution is that a worthwhile goal.
The issue is that SAGE has a remit to look at the R and not a lot else, we need for the scientists to be forced to take into account the effects of their policy wider than just how it effects the R, maybe that's verging too far into rule by technocrat but it's very clear that none of the politicians have got the capability to investigate these issues themselves.
Bozo started following the science. Then he followed Scotland. Now he's going to follow the opposition, isn't he?
(I'm very much not making a direct parallel in the below) I wonder if PB had existed in WW2 what the daily Churchill posts would have been like? The fall of Singapore? Would have been ugly! (Not making parallels disclaimer off)
Boris is doing ok. Just ok though, and that's making allowance for the impossibility of the situation and some small allowance for him being ill.
The Government is doing much the same (a tad better perhaps).
The opposition is doing well too. I don't agree with their current policy flash, but they are being quite responsible.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
It is a total unrealistic that TTI can cope even at low levels. It just isn't possible using a manual system. By the time somebody has felt ill (3-5 days after infection), got a test (another day), had the result (another day at best), the trace team start to get on it a week after the infection. Even if they get through to everybody you were in close contact with, which isn't possible, those who have been infected will have already passed it on for several others.
There may be differences within the Tory Party over the format of Brexit, over Cummings or the extent of Covid restrictions but one thing that unites all us Tories from Peterhead to Bournemouth is a loathing of the SNP and we will never give into them!!
So after independence, the policy of the Conservatives will be to reconstitute the union and they will put that in their manifestos on both sides of the border?
I can understand people disliking their opponents political philosophy, but 'loathing' seems a strong word. Why take that view; seems counter-productive to me.
The SNP loathe the Tories, just the feeling is mutual that is all
Speak for yourself
This conservative does not loath the SNP or the Scots
Most of my living family outside Wales are Scots
I do not agree with the SNP but keep your loathing to yourself and your tanks, you Sassenach
I spend a few days away on a research project and when I get tired and log on what do I find? Yet again, this year, it's even some of the southern Tories who are standing up for democracy in Scotland! The indy debate really has changed ...
BigG is neither southern, he lives in Wales, nor a staunch Tory, he voted for Blair twice
FPT and o/T - but I cannot let the slur on BigG stand. Her is almost due south of me - not even SSW.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
My gut is that two more tiers will be added:
4) All but essential retail, schools and unis closed. Building sites and online continues to operate (as per March lockdown)
5) Schools and unis closed. Just essential retail left. Can't leave your county except for work etc.
Because it makes NO sense to go from a lOCAL tier 3, which is still quite a soft lockdown, to NATIONWIDE lockdown. It hurts Winchester to slowly help Wigan....
Yes I was surprised that just 3 tiers were announced. I would have announced 5 Tiers like you said, even if you don't want to use them they're there as a threat of what may be needed next if Tier 3 doesn't work.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
Exactly. I'm rather at a loss to understand how the Tories on this board have pivoted so rapidly from assuring us that TTI was working just fine (world-beating, even) to assuming that TTI can never work, so there's no point even trying to reduce the number of cases to a manageable level.
The only way to save the Union is for Labour to win the next election . Starmer is far more popular in Scotland than Bozo , although ironically even if inspite of that if Scotland does become independent then it’s likely to happen under a Labour government where the Tories will lay the blame on Starmer even though its they with their idiotic Brexit and clown leader who would have done all the damage.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
If you work in the public sector, or are on a pension, the COVID impact is either zero or maybe positive because you are working from home.
That's a massive chunk of the population.
The impact of COVID is being felt extremely unevenly. One thing the government must do is spread the load. I wonder what that poll would look like if Sunak announced a 5% across the board cut in pension payments.
I reckon you could turn that poll on its head, effectively.
I work in the private sector, financially it's been huge positive working from home, I'm saving £650 a month on train tickets, maybe £200 a month on eating out for lunch, and I've not bought any work related clothes since March.
That 5% cut will have no impact on me, my colleagues have similar positives.
I'm the same, to be fair. Private sector and doing much better because of no commute, but I also realise the current arrangement is not sustainable.
Let me repeat for those unaware: The North East has already been in “Tier 2” for a month. We should already have the data on its effect on case numbers.
We already know, the doubling time in the NE is slowing down under the current measures and the tier 3 option is still available.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
We know that isn't going to happen because only 4 in 5 people who test positive don't isolate. This is what needs to be addressed and a new lockdown doesn't change that once it's over.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
We know that isn't going to happen because only 4 in 5 people who test positive don't isolate. This is what needs to be addressed and a new lockdown doesn't change that once it's over.
And of course we are still busy importing new cases, with bugger all checks at airports.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Why would he do that, if pumping works indefinitely? Why not just keep pumping? An indefinite series of temporary fixes comes to the same thing as a permanent fix, and is sometimes the only solution to a problem Why eat three meals a day when you're just going to be hungry again tomorrow? Why clean your house when you know that you're going to have to do it all over again?
Also, 100% agreed Cyclefree. None of this has been answered by anyone who supports this policy. Even the scientists just say "yeah but it brings the R down", but in an environment where there is no short term resolution is that a worthwhile goal.
The issue is that SAGE has a remit to look at the R and not a lot else, we need for the scientists to be forced to take into account the effects of their policy wider than just how it effects the R, maybe that's verging too far into rule by technocrat but it's very clear that none of the politicians have got the capability to investigate these issues themselves.
Heneghan has proposed that we fund a proper trial of the areas in local lockdown and do something outrageous - actually find some evidence for SAGE to use as to whether these tiers work or not.
He's such a moron, with an inflated view of his own importance. There would be more funerals, more in intensive care and less doctors available due to dealing with Covid. I distrust anyone giving out medical advice that doesn't have a background in medicine.
He's right though that Hancock has set up a classic strawman. No one is saying we just let the virus rip. And certainly not the Sweden advocates like me or the Great Barrington people.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Why would he do that, if pumping works indefinitely? Why not just keep pumping? An indefinite series of temporary fixes comes to the same thing as a permanent fix, and is sometimes the only solution to a problem Why eat three meals a day when you're just going to be hungry again tomorrow? Why clean your house when you know that you're going to have to do it all over again?
Indeed. You do what you have to do to stay afloat, and you use the time you gain to work out more permanent solutions.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
Looking at the last lockdown - hospitalizations peaked on April 1st, 9 days after lockdown.
On that day we had 3,099 new people hospitalized with COVID in England. Two weeks later, it was 1,608. Three weeks it was 1,310. So that's more than halving the number of new people going into hospital.
This circuit breaker might be less effective because schools will be partially open. But I would still expect a substantial health benefit.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Why would he do that, if pumping works indefinitely? Why not just keep pumping? An indefinite series of temporary fixes comes to the same thing as a permanent fix, and is sometimes the only solution to a problem Why eat three meals a day when you're just going to be hungry again tomorrow? Why clean your house when you know that you're going to have to do it all over again?
Bozo started following the science. Then he followed Scotland. Now he's going to follow the opposition, isn't he?
(I'm very much not making a direct parallel in the below) I wonder if PB had existed in WW2 what the daily Churchill posts would have been like? The fall of Singapore? Would have been ugly! (Not making parallels disclaimer off)
Boris is doing ok. Just ok though, and that's making allowance for the impossibility of the situation and some small allowance for him being ill.
The Government is doing much the same (a tad better perhaps).
The opposition is doing well too. I don't agree with their current policy flash, but they are being quite responsible.
Comparing Bozo to Churchill is an insult to the latter, though, isn’t it?
I’m reading ‘the Splendid and the Vile’ at the moment - the story of the Churchill family and Britain in 1940 written in novelistic style by an American. It’s a very good read.
One thing that strikes you about Churchill is that he was a workaholic and obsessive over details. He sat in bed firing off memos to all and sundry about every minutiae of Britain’s defences. A lot of this was of course unhelpful, but you can’t fault him for not being interested in knowing the detail, nor for not making sure that pretty much every idea that came his way was researched by someone, so that no loose end was left untied.
Nor did he spend the crisis chasing after every young musician who came his way.
His style of politics and governance was about as far from that of the lazy clown currently in No 10 as it is possible to imagine.
He's such a moron, with an inflated view of his own importance. There would be more funerals, more in intensive care and less doctors available due to dealing with Covid. I distrust anyone giving out medical advice that doesn't have a background in medicine.
He's right though that Hancock has set up a classic strawman. No one is saying we just let the virus rip. And certainly not the Sweden advocates like me or the Great Barrington people.
He's such a moron, with an inflated view of his own importance. There would be more funerals, more in intensive care and less doctors available due to dealing with Covid. I distrust anyone giving out medical advice that doesn't have a background in medicine.
He's right though that Hancock has set up a classic strawman. No one is saying we just let the virus rip. And certainly not the Sweden advocates like me or the Great Barrington people.
I wholeheartedly supported the first lockdown (indeed I thought it came later than it ought), as it gave us time to work out answers, and lasted long enough to get rates of infection low enough to give us more time after if was relaxed.
We appear not to have spent that time terrifically well.
As far as the proposed circuit breaker is concerned, other than give us a couple of weeks' pause, I don't have an answer to Cyclefree's questions.
I think that is being a bit harsh. If the announcements are to be believed we now have things like 4 months of PPE supply. Testing capacity is 350k and still increasing. We do have an app, but it is massively limited by what Apple / Google allow.
I think part of the problem is the government have oversold so many things e.g. get an antibody test and you will have an immunity passport, track and trace will be able to hunt down all the outbreaks, we will have an app that will definitely tell you if you were near a positive person, etc.
Realistically, track and trace didn't even work that well when cases where just in the handfuls, because it is too slow a process to do it manually.
The reality from the start, which initially the likes of Witty stated, this will be with us for several years and we will have to live with it.
I didn't say the first lockdown was useless, or that we hadn't done anything, just that we didn't do anything particularly effectively (aside from the clinical trials). Clearly we are better prepared now than we were on some fronts.
Track and trace in particular has proved a huge disappointment, and I don't believe the whole testing to isolation process need be anywhere near as slow.
And I'm not quite sure what the proposed fortnight is supposed to do.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
At best, it gets the virus down to levels that test, trace & isolate can cope with. Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
Exactly. I'm rather at a loss to understand how the Tories on this board have pivoted so rapidly from assuring us that TTI was working just fine (world-beating, even) to assuming that TTI can never work, so there's no point even trying to reduce the number of cases to a manageable level.
TTI reminds me a bit of a consulting project I was on. Implementation team of a big systems change project.
Near Christmas, 12 months into dev, I was tasked with working out how the biz would actually use the new system tools whilst my boss, the stream lead, was away.
I had sat in at least 10 high level meetings with board members, dev director, IT teams etc in the previous weeks to get up to scratch with the background systems and biz users workflow. After about 2 hours studying the detail, I realised that all had failed to recognise the steps previous taken by the biz users were not inherent to the old tools, but inherent to the sector. And so the very way the new system was designed to be used had to be approached differently.
So after 2 weeks of head scratching and testing with large groups of biz users, I came up with a solution that just about worked but had flaws. All other options were too hard (technically), too costly, or too unpalatable (to the business users, or more specifically their managers) to contemplate.
In an ideal world, we'd use cc and mobile phone data, but it would be unpalatable to society. In a slightly less creepy ideal world, everyone would have a smartphone and would download the app, but we don't live in an ideal world.
So we've ended up with a TTI system that just about works, but has significant flaws. It costs a fortune and has too many lag times built in to be that effective. It will be having some effect, and no doubt lots of people are working very hard in it. But the design of the system just isn't going to cut it for the task at hand....
The only way to save the Union is for Labour to win the next election . Starmer is far more popular in Scotland than Bozo , although ironically even if inspite of that if Scotland does become independent then it’s likely to happen under a Labour government where the Tories will lay the blame on Starmer even though its they with their idiotic Brexit and clown leader who would have done all the damage.
The question to my mind is whether local Labour is popular enough to outweigh a great deal of overlap with the SNP and the Tories. If you want social democracy, SNP are your folk - they are implementijng it as best they can, remember how Mr Corbyn came to Scotland and demanded this and that only to find it had already been done. If you want full fat Britnattery HYUFD style, go for the ScoTories. Whyt bother with Labour?
And I'm not thinking of Mr Leonard. I don't think he's that bad - I just can't think who could replace him without making it worse, in terms of civil wars within SLAB or a conflict between Mr Starmer and his branch office in Scotland (again, remember SLAB is a mere construct with no legal independence). I recall that it was Mr Leonard's Labour party opponents who complained about him being from Yorkshire, not his "official" opponents (and how many of his predecessors fell to hatchet jobs in their backs, e.g. Ms Alexander, Mr McLeish. And Labour has soon to face the dilemma of whether to ally themselves with the ScoTories, and we all know what happened last time.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
Of course, that 20% would be a lot higher if we had Sweden's social security system.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
Looking at the last lockdown - hospitalizations peaked on April 1st, 9 days after lockdown.
On that day we had 3,099 new people hospitalized with COVID in England. Two weeks later, it was 1,608. Three weeks it was 1,310. So that's more than halving the number of new people going into hospital.
This circuit breaker might be less effective because schools will be partially open. But I would still expect a substantial health benefit.
But that matches what I said. It took a month to see a substantial reduction. And that's with a vastly more serious lockdown.
2 weeks just isn't long enough. It will do a lot of economic damage but not much epidemiological change.
Liverpool and Man Utd voting against their own Big Picture (power grab) proposal? This is a crazy year.
"The clubs also decided on a £50m rescue package for League One and Two clubs at the meeting."
That's not going to touch the sides for them, given I think it is now clear we aren't getting crowds back this season.
Combined annual revenue for League 1 & 2 was a record £282m last year so £50m is very much touching the sides. It may not be enough for all but makes a big difference. Govt may match it as well.
Have we given up on testing, tracing and isolating then?
I will be surprised if we ever get that working to a level that allows a resumption of normality. I think we're relying on medical solutions to end this.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
Of course, that 20% would be a lot higher if we had Sweden's social security system.
No it wouldn't the most common reason people broke isolation was to go shopping, not going to work.
The only way to save the Union is for Labour to win the next election . Starmer is far more popular in Scotland than Bozo , although ironically even if inspite of that if Scotland does become independent then it’s likely to happen under a Labour government where the Tories will lay the blame on Starmer even though its they with their idiotic Brexit and clown leader who would have done all the damage.
Ironically, the presence of the SNP whinging whilst lavishing on their huge subsidy probably prevents Labour winning the next election....
The SNP paradox is going to be:
Can only get an indy referendum under a Labour Govt, or in coalition, but that their whinging leads enough English voters to vote to prevent the former, or the latter, happening, at a general election.
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Why would he do that, if pumping works indefinitely? Why not just keep pumping? An indefinite series of temporary fixes comes to the same thing as a permanent fix, and is sometimes the only solution to a problem Why eat three meals a day when you're just going to be hungry again tomorrow? Why clean your house when you know that you're going to have to do it all over again?
Also, whilst the lifeboats (vaccines or mass treatments) will take somewhat longer to develop, optimise and distribute, in the grand scheme of things, we're damn lucky to be alive in a time when they are being developed as rapidly as they are. A year ago, this virus was probably still a tear in a Chinese bat's eye. It's pretty likely that by this time next year, there will be a vaccine that's good enough and inside enough people to solve the problem. If that happens, that's amazing if you think about it.
Yes, the current situation sucks. And we need to think how to share the pain well. But we need to avoid a mistake analogous to suing for peace in World War II in 1941.
Now that's something that really was expensive and harmed the life chances and mental health of the young.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
If you work in the public sector, or are on a pension, the COVID impact is either zero or maybe positive because you are working from home.
That's a massive chunk of the population.
The impact of COVID is being felt extremely unevenly. One thing the government must do is spread the load. I wonder what that poll would look like if Sunak announced a 5% across the board cut in pension payments.
I reckon you could turn that poll on its head, effectively.
I work in the private sector, financially it's been huge positive working from home, I'm saving £650 a month on train tickets, maybe £200 a month on eating out for lunch, and I've not bought any work related clothes since March.
That 5% cut will have no impact on me, my colleagues have similar positives.
I'm the same, to be fair. Private sector and doing much better because of no commute, but I also realise the current arrangement is not sustainable.
The sums show it isn't.
Just to note that some of us in the private sector have had a 6 month temporary pay cut and seen colleagues shown the door. But at least there is no need to iron with WFH.
The answer to Gauke's question is at least three months. Once we have gone into national lockdown in winter we will not be allowed again until the spring.
I am sure the answer will be "I would follow the science"....which to the public sounds great...in reality it means 2-3 months in lockdown, not 2 weeks.
Bozo started following the science. Then he followed Scotland. Now he's going to follow the opposition, isn't he?
(I'm very much not making a direct parallel in the below) I wonder if PB had existed in WW2 what the daily Churchill posts would have been like? The fall of Singapore? Would have been ugly! (Not making parallels disclaimer off)
Boris is doing ok. Just ok though, and that's making allowance for the impossibility of the situation and some small allowance for him being ill.
The Government is doing much the same (a tad better perhaps).
The opposition is doing well too. I don't agree with their current policy flash, but they are being quite responsible.
Comparing Bozo to Churchill is an insult to the latter, though, isn’t it?
I’m reading ‘the Splendid and the Vile’ at the moment - the story of the Churchill family and Britain in 1940 written in novelistic style by an American. It’s a very good read.
One thing that strikes you about Churchill is that he was a workaholic and obsessive over details. He sat in bed firing off memos to all and sundry about every minutiae of Britain’s defences. A lot of this was of course unhelpful, but you can’t fault him for not being interested in knowing the detail, nor for not making sure that pretty much every idea that came his way was researched by someone, so that no loose end was left untied.
Nor did he spend the crisis chasing after every young musician who came his way.
His style of politics and governance was about as far from that of the lazy clown currently in No 10 as it is possible to imagine.
I think I was pretty clear in NOT comparing Boris with Churchill.
I am sure the answer will be "I would follow the science"....which to the public sounds great...in reality it means 2-3 months in lockdown, not 2 weeks.
No the answer would be 2-3 weeks! Otherwise he is calling for a second lockdown, which he is clearly not.
This circuit breaker idea reminds me in a way of lots of Corbyn policies. They sound great on the surface, a quick fix, but once you scratch the surface they are bloody expensive, there are lots of other factors that aren't being talked about and not even certain to work e.g. free broadband from the Commie Cable Company.
I am sure the answer will be "I would follow the science"....which to the public sounds great...in reality it means 2-3 months in lockdown, not 2 weeks.
No the answer would be 2-3 weeks! Otherwise he is calling for a second lockdown, which he is clearly not.
It would be a very brave politician to lift a "circuit breaker" when cases and deaths are still rising....which they would be, because 2 weeks isn't long enough for it to impact on them.
Reality is nobody would, the public outcry would be deafening...you want me to go back to work when deaths are still rising.....
I am sure the answer will be "I would follow the science"....which to the public sounds great...in reality it means 2-3 months in lockdown, not 2 weeks.
No the answer would be 2-3 weeks! Otherwise he is calling for a second lockdown, which he is clearly not.
It would be a very brave politician to lift a lockdown when cases and deaths are still rising....which they would be, because 2 weeks isn't long enough for it to impact on them.
What does it matter? He is only proposing it to score political points - he has been rumbled as a dithering bore, the neutrals are starting to dislike him, he might as well try something
The "Circuit Breaker" is at a best a delaying tactic. When it is over, we will still have the disease.
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
You are in the middle of the ocean in a leaking ship. The captain orders the pumps to be worked twice a day, every day, to prevent the ship sinking. Is the pumping at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time, because when it is completed, you still have the leak?
Yes. The virus is here for keeps.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
Why would he do that, if pumping works indefinitely? Why not just keep pumping? An indefinite series of temporary fixes comes to the same thing as a permanent fix, and is sometimes the only solution to a problem Why eat three meals a day when you're just going to be hungry again tomorrow? Why clean your house when you know that you're going to have to do it all over again?
So - indefinite lockdown then?
Who knows? But you seem to be rejecting even temporary lockdowns, purely on the grounds that they are temporary. No point in applying that tourniquet, it will only prevent the victim from dying for the next 15 minutes.
Bozo started following the science. Then he followed Scotland. Now he's going to follow the opposition, isn't he?
(I'm very much not making a direct parallel in the below) I wonder if PB had existed in WW2 what the daily Churchill posts would have been like? The fall of Singapore? Would have been ugly! (Not making parallels disclaimer off)
Boris is doing ok. Just ok though, and that's making allowance for the impossibility of the situation and some small allowance for him being ill.
The Government is doing much the same (a tad better perhaps).
The opposition is doing well too. I don't agree with their current policy flash, but they are being quite responsible.
Comparing Bozo to Churchill is an insult to the latter, though, isn’t it?
I’m reading ‘the Splendid and the Vile’ at the moment - the story of the Churchill family and Britain in 1940 written in novelistic style by an American. It’s a very good read.
One thing that strikes you about Churchill is that he was a workaholic and obsessive over details. He sat in bed firing off memos to all and sundry about every minutiae of Britain’s defences. A lot of this was of course unhelpful, but you can’t fault him for not being interested in knowing the detail, nor for not making sure that pretty much every idea that came his way was researched by someone, so that no loose end was left untied.
Nor did he spend the crisis chasing after every young musician who came his way.
His style of politics and governance was about as far from that of the lazy clown currently in No 10 as it is possible to imagine.
I think I was pretty clear in NOT comparing Boris with Churchill.
Your disclaimer in brackets was in the realm of “I’m not racist but....”. Why bring up wartime stuff if you didn’t intend to make some sort of comparison?
Long covid gets plenty of attention in some media - Guardian and newstatesman have had regular pieces on it. Guardian has a piece today about hearing problems with the virus.
It's a nasty condition and this is a horrible virus. But one still has weigh up the costs and benefits. Can we really shut down a whole society and economy because maybe 2-5% of properly infected people (i.e. not just + cases) get symptoms that last longer than a month and an even smaller % have symptoms after several months?
I am sure the answer will be "I would follow the science"....which to the public sounds great...in reality it means 2-3 months in lockdown, not 2 weeks.
No the answer would be 2-3 weeks! Otherwise he is calling for a second lockdown, which he is clearly not.
Comments
It is, at best, a delay and, at worst, a complete waste of time.
As I said, if you polled people on whether people who test positive should isolate the result would be close to 100% in favour, the reality is that only 20% of people actually do it.
Polling on this subject is completely useless.
We appear not to have spent that time terrifically well.
As far as the proposed circuit breaker is concerned, other than give us a couple of weeks' pause, I don't have an answer to Cyclefree's questions.
That's a massive chunk of the population.
The impact of COVID is being felt extremely unevenly. One thing the government must do is spread the load. I wonder what that poll would look like if Sunak announced a 5% across the board cut in pension payments.
I reckon you could turn that poll on its head, effectively.
Anyone who endorses a "2 week circuit breaker" is lying to themselves or lying to us. 2 weeks will do nothing but inflict catastrophic economic damage on every business hit by it.
A 2 month circuit break might give health benefits. A 2 week circuit break is a farce. All pain no gain.
A soft easy option to claim to support but not a proposal anyone credible or serious could endorse.
Especially when that month coincided with the explosion in student infections?
This is why its farcical to suggest that 2 weeks would work. Even a month isn't long enough to tell if its working meaningfully yet or not, absolutely no way to tell within 2 weeks.
Answers? To paraphrase Mel Brooks, "We don't need no stinking answers"
The importance of this announcement at this point in time is to divert attention from the clusterf**k about to happen tomorrow and Friday.
Far, far better to have the country up in arms over Covid than Brexit. Quelle coincidence that the announcements happen a couple of days before we realise that a complete capitulation by Boris is on the cards...
How come Cornwall had an extremely busy tourist season, yet there is no Covid there?
I think part of the problem is the government have oversold so many things e.g. get an antibody test and you will have an immunity passport, track and trace will be able to hunt down all the outbreaks, we will have an app that will definitely tell you if you were near a positive person, etc.
Realistically, track and trace didn't even work that well when cases where just in the handfuls, because it is too slow a process to do it manually.
The reality from the start, which initially the likes of Witty stated, this will be with us for several years and we will have to live with it.
Then TTI can control the outbreak and we won't need further lockdowns.
We would have far fewer cases than otherwise and lots of lives are saved.
I think the realistic worst is that it is just a delay.
However vague unclear answers below:
1,2,3 - 2-3 weeks is a circuit breaker, longer is a lockdown. A circuit breaker moves the infected numbers back a few weeks in time allowing either slightly looser restrictions or fewer deaths over the following few months, possibly a combination. It does not give a long term solution and no-one is saying it will do.
4 - We will be in a similar place as we are today, but a better place than we would be in a months time without the breaker.
5 - This is the interesting and difficult question. The govt has so far eventually delivered a reasonable and fair support across the country. Business liquidations were actually down for the year to July for example which is remarkable. They only did so under media pressure and are trying to reduce the level of state support, so who knows? Realistically I would assume support is somewhere halfway between what is currently promised (not enough) and what we had over the summer (enough for most).
4) All but essential retail, schools and unis closed. Building sites and online continues to operate (as per March lockdown)
5) Schools and unis closed. Just essential retail left. Can't leave your county except for work etc.
Because it makes NO sense to go from a lOCAL tier 3, which is still quite a soft lockdown, to NATIONWIDE lockdown. It hurts Winchester to slowly help Wigan....
That 5% cut will have no impact on me, my colleagues have similar positives.
In a ship with an infinite ocean ahead of it, the captain would be better off getting the crew and passengers into the lifeboats.
I wonder how people would react to a draconian track & trace and then opening up the economy to a significant extent.
Would please both "sides" potentially. OK you can go and party but if you all catch the pox then you are indoors on your own for 14 days at peril of a £XX,000 fine.
The issue is that SAGE has a remit to look at the R and not a lot else, we need for the scientists to be forced to take into account the effects of their policy wider than just how it effects the R, maybe that's verging too far into rule by technocrat but it's very clear that none of the politicians have got the capability to investigate these issues themselves.
I wonder if PB had existed in WW2 what the daily Churchill posts would have been like?
The fall of Singapore? Would have been ugly!
(Not making parallels disclaimer off)
Boris is doing ok. Just ok though, and that's making allowance for the impossibility of the situation and some small allowance for him being ill.
The Government is doing much the same (a tad better perhaps).
The opposition is doing well too. I don't agree with their current policy flash, but they are being quite responsible.
The sums show it isn't.
https://twitter.com/mcdougallsophia/status/1316372041398915073?s=21
See: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/14/no-good-evidence-circuit-breaker-lockdown/
On that day we had 3,099 new people hospitalized with COVID in England. Two weeks later, it was 1,608. Three weeks it was 1,310. So that's more than halving the number of new people going into hospital.
This circuit breaker might be less effective because schools will be partially open. But I would still expect a substantial health benefit.
That's not going to touch the sides for them, given I think it is now clear we aren't getting crowds back this season.
I’m reading ‘the Splendid and the Vile’ at the moment - the story of the Churchill family and Britain in 1940 written in novelistic style by an American. It’s a very good read.
One thing that strikes you about Churchill is that he was a workaholic and obsessive over details. He sat in bed firing off memos to all and sundry about every minutiae of Britain’s defences. A lot of this was of course unhelpful, but you can’t fault him for not being interested in knowing the detail, nor for not making sure that pretty much every idea that came his way was researched by someone, so that no loose end was left untied.
Nor did he spend the crisis chasing after every young musician who came his way.
His style of politics and governance was about as far from that of the lazy clown currently in No 10 as it is possible to imagine.
Track and trace in particular has proved a huge disappointment, and I don't believe the whole testing to isolation process need be anywhere near as slow.
And I'm not quite sure what the proposed fortnight is supposed to do.
Near Christmas, 12 months into dev, I was tasked with working out how the biz would actually use the new system tools whilst my boss, the stream lead, was away.
I had sat in at least 10 high level meetings with board members, dev director, IT teams etc in the previous weeks to get up to scratch with the background systems and biz users workflow. After about 2 hours studying the detail, I realised that all had failed to recognise the steps previous taken by the biz users were not inherent to the old tools, but inherent to the sector. And so the very way the new system was designed to be used had to be approached differently.
So after 2 weeks of head scratching and testing with large groups of biz users, I came up with a solution that just about worked but had flaws. All other options were too hard (technically), too costly, or too unpalatable (to the business users, or more specifically their managers) to contemplate.
In an ideal world, we'd use cc and mobile phone data, but it would be unpalatable to society. In a slightly less creepy ideal world, everyone would have a smartphone and would download the app, but we don't live in an ideal world.
So we've ended up with a TTI system that just about works, but has significant flaws. It costs a fortune and has too many lag times built in to be that effective. It will be having some effect, and no doubt lots of people are working very hard in it. But the design of the system just isn't going to cut it for the task at hand....
And I'm not thinking of Mr Leonard. I don't think he's that bad - I just can't think who could replace him without making it worse, in terms of civil wars within SLAB or a conflict between Mr Starmer and his branch office in Scotland (again, remember SLAB is a mere construct with no legal independence). I recall that it was Mr Leonard's Labour party opponents who complained about him being from Yorkshire, not his "official" opponents (and how many of his predecessors fell to hatchet jobs in their backs, e.g. Ms Alexander, Mr McLeish. And Labour has soon to face the dilemma of whether to ally themselves with the ScoTories, and we all know what happened last time.
Later peeps!
2 weeks just isn't long enough. It will do a lot of economic damage but not much epidemiological change.
The SNP paradox is going to be:
Can only get an indy referendum under a Labour Govt, or in coalition, but that their whinging leads enough English voters to vote to prevent the former, or the latter, happening, at a general election.
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1316373104269160449
Yes, the current situation sucks. And we need to think how to share the pain well. But we need to avoid a mistake analogous to suing for peace in World War II in 1941.
Now that's something that really was expensive and harmed the life chances and mental health of the young.
Rasmussen have Biden by five over Trump nationally.
FWIW
Reality is nobody would, the public outcry would be deafening...you want me to go back to work when deaths are still rising.....
Rasmussen:
Biden: 50% (-2)
Trump: 45% (+5)
All owa the place.
It's a nasty condition and this is a horrible virus. But one still has weigh up the costs and benefits. Can we really shut down a whole society and economy because maybe 2-5% of properly infected people (i.e. not just + cases) get symptoms that last longer than a month and an even smaller % have symptoms after several months?