Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A Politico survey of early voting data in key WH2020 swing sta

12346

Comments

  • That 5:30 meeting should have started now and with it being online I wonder how long until something starts to leak. Or if there even is anything major to leak.
  • Blame the young is always the easy way out. Cowards.

    Right now young people

    cannot travel
    cannot associate in groups
    cannot afford to buy houses
    have big personal debts if they went to university
    Will inherit an enormous debt mountain from the boomers
    Pay then highest taxes in 50 years to fund the care of the elderly
    Will soon experience mass unemployment
    Missed a whole term of education
    Are having their development affected by mask wearing and other mentally traumatic events

    Its a dreadful, dreadful situation and anybody blaming them for their fantastic compliance and fortitude in this period is a c8nt.
    It's not that bad. They can still have sex, as long as it's not in groups of more than six.
    At least they don't need to be 1 metre plus apart for that anymore.
  • FF43 said:

    Just thought of something.

    The Internal Market Bill is a poison pill. It doesn't just ostentatiously break the law. It takes aim at the Good Friday Agreement and drives a coach and horses through the devolution settlement. It is objectionable in every respect.

    IT IS INTENDED TO BE OBJECTIONABLE. Cunning plan alert !

    The aim is get a coalition of Starmer Labourites, SNP'ers, Tory rebels, useful idiots in the Lords etc to vote it down.

    Then go back to the EU and say, sorry can't give you UK State Aid intentions. The other lot voted it down.

    Now we can blame Starmer for No Deal. Wahey !!!!!

    ----

    Plausible?

    I think it's cock-up rather than conspiracy.

    To the extent there was design I think it might have been to do a bit of sabre-rattling with the EU and/or protect the UK from State Aid trojan-horses in the event of No Deal (which is the cock-up).
    I simply cannot understand why Boris has done this for no apparent advantage rather than just declare the talks are over and no deal at the end of December
    Cowardice, and the kind of stupidity that thinks it's clever.

    Johnson could have pulled the plug on the negotiations at any point. "No offence to our friends and neighbours, but we and they just need different things. The transition will run until the end of December, them we will trade with the EU on terms similar to Australia. Provided we organise properly, all will be fine." There would have been some grumbling, but with a majority of 80, it would have been ignorable. And a No Deal announced in (say) February or even July would have been less likely to fail than one announced in October.

    But in doing that, No Deal would have been his decision. All the responsibility for anything going wrong would be on his shoulders. Which isn't his idea of fun at all.

    So- my hunch is that the point of this week's shenanigans was to create a disturbance which would collapse negotiations and allow him to blame someone else. Starmer, Barnier, anyone else. After all, it worked last autumn. (Remember that the government was all set to filibuster the Benn bill in the Lords, just before prorogation kicked in. Then they didn't. The memoirs of that day will be interesting.)

    The trouble is that, for a couple of reasons (government majority of 80, Starmer being able to read the sign saying "THIS IS A HUGE TRAP"), the opposition aren't playing ball.

    So he has created a bill with a poison pill. Nobody in the opposition is going to stop him swallowing it. Maybe there's a plan.

    Your move, Mr Johnson.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,513
    Half a million people - over 10% of the state population - evacuated to avoid massive wildfires in Oregon:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-54113416
    ...4.4 million acres have been razed, according to the National Interagency Fire Center - an area larger than Connecticut and slightly smaller than Wales....
  • No election, no surprises there then!
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    On the current situation - the ONS numbers for incidence

    image
  • FF43 said:

    Just thought of something.

    The Internal Market Bill is a poison pill. It doesn't just ostentatiously break the law. It takes aim at the Good Friday Agreement and drives a coach and horses through the devolution settlement. It is objectionable in every respect.

    IT IS INTENDED TO BE OBJECTIONABLE. Cunning plan alert !

    The aim is get a coalition of Starmer Labourites, SNP'ers, Tory rebels, useful idiots in the Lords etc to vote it down.

    Then go back to the EU and say, sorry can't give you UK State Aid intentions. The other lot voted it down.

    Now we can blame Starmer for No Deal. Wahey !!!!!

    ----

    Plausible?

    I think it's cock-up rather than conspiracy.

    To the extent there was design I think it might have been to do a bit of sabre-rattling with the EU and/or protect the UK from State Aid trojan-horses in the event of No Deal (which is the cock-up).
    I simply cannot understand why Boris has done this for no apparent advantage rather than just declare the talks are over and no deal at the end of December
    Cowardice, and the kind of stupidity that thinks it's clever.

    Johnson could have pulled the plug on the negotiations at any point. "No offence to our friends and neighbours, but we and they just need different things. The transition will run until the end of December, them we will trade with the EU on terms similar to Australia. Provided we organise properly, all will be fine." There would have been some grumbling, but with a majority of 80, it would have been ignorable. And a No Deal announced in (say) February or even July would have been less likely to fail than one announced in October.

    But in doing that, No Deal would have been his decision. All the responsibility for anything going wrong would be on his shoulders. Which isn't his idea of fun at all.

    So- my hunch is that the point of this week's shenanigans was to create a disturbance which would collapse negotiations and allow him to blame someone else. Starmer, Barnier, anyone else. After all, it worked last autumn. (Remember that the government was all set to filibuster the Benn bill in the Lords, just before prorogation kicked in. Then they didn't. The memoirs of that day will be interesting.)

    The trouble is that, for a couple of reasons (government majority of 80, Starmer being able to read the sign saying "THIS IS A HUGE TRAP"), the opposition aren't playing ball.

    So he has created a bill with a poison pill. Nobody in the opposition is going to stop him swallowing it. Maybe there's a plan.

    Your move, Mr Johnson.
    Good summary
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208

    FF43 said:

    Just thought of something.

    The Internal Market Bill is a poison pill. It doesn't just ostentatiously break the law. It takes aim at the Good Friday Agreement and drives a coach and horses through the devolution settlement. It is objectionable in every respect.

    IT IS INTENDED TO BE OBJECTIONABLE. Cunning plan alert !

    The aim is get a coalition of Starmer Labourites, SNP'ers, Tory rebels, useful idiots in the Lords etc to vote it down.

    Then go back to the EU and say, sorry can't give you UK State Aid intentions. The other lot voted it down.

    Now we can blame Starmer for No Deal. Wahey !!!!!

    ----

    Plausible?

    I think it's cock-up rather than conspiracy.

    To the extent there was design I think it might have been to do a bit of sabre-rattling with the EU and/or protect the UK from State Aid trojan-horses in the event of No Deal (which is the cock-up).
    It comes to the same thing, does it not? The EU will only agree a deal if the WA overrides are removed and if the UK govt explains its State Aid policy. If removing the first also removes the second, there won't be a deal. A deal is only possible if the Internal Market Bill goes through with the WA clauses amended out. But the IM Bill is so objectionable in other ways that it will likely be voted down or delayed in its entirety.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    UK Positivity data -

    image
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,823

    On the current situation - the ONS numbers for incidence

    image

    Interesting, on the graphs that you've shown previously from the ONS it has looked relatively flat up until now. Maybe the y-axis was hiding the gentle rise.
  • Scott_xP said:
    The Conservative Party is now a foreign power?
  • Sounds like it
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895

    He's losing his marbles, isn't he?

    Yes

    And this whole speech is "back me, or..."
  • We left at the right time didn't we Richard?

    Imagine being associated with this embarrassment.
  • Scott_xP said:
    "No questions" is going to go down like a lead balloon, isn't it?
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,050
    edited September 2020
    Scott_xP said:
    Irony, as they say, with a frequently American and Russian-sourced referendum campaign in social media, quite possibly leading to scottish independence and irish reunification, knows no bounds.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    RobD said:

    On the current situation - the ONS numbers for incidence

    image

    Interesting, on the graphs that you've shown previously from the ONS it has looked relatively flat up until now. Maybe the y-axis was hiding the gentle rise.
    This is from the raw data - https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/11september2020

    Doesn't use their graph - which uses a much larger Y axis
  • In situations like this, probably worth keeping an eye on which ministers aren't saying much.
  • Scott_xP said:
    The Conservative Party is now a foreign power?
    It soon will be foreign if you live in Scotland or Northern Ireland.
  • We left at the right time didn't we Richard?

    Imagine being associated with this embarrassment.
    Yep. No risk of any pangs of regret now.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    Scott_xP said:
    Told you! He's going to blame Starmer.

    Starmer is a rather foreign sounding name is it not? Everyone knows where they are with a Johnson!
  • We left at the right time didn't we Richard?

    Imagine being associated with this embarrassment.
    If I was in your (normally) brightly colours shoes, I think the admission of attending Steps and Vengaboys concerts would weight more heavily :-)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265
    edited September 2020
    So Barnier is now threatening to ban UK food exports to the EU if no trade deal is agreed, if the UK responds in kind better stock up on the brie and champagne and paella and pasta

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8721645/Gordon-Brown-blasts-Boris-Johnson-Brexit-plans.html
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895

    Chinese hacking the Zoom connection?

    Dom pressed the wrong button in Mission Control...
  • FF43 said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Told you! He's going to blame Starmer.

    Starmer is a rather foreign sounding name is it not? Everyone knows where they are with a Johnson!
    Boris is a Russian-sounding name, no?
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    LadyG said:

    Blame the young is always the easy way out. Cowards.

    Right now young people

    cannot travel
    cannot associate in groups
    cannot afford to buy houses
    have big personal debts if they went to university
    Will inherit an enormous debt mountain from the boomers
    Pay then highest taxes in 50 years to fund the care of the elderly
    Will soon experience mass unemployment
    Missed a whole term of education
    Are having their development affected by mask wearing and other mentally traumatic events

    Its a dreadful, dreadful situation and anybody blaming them for their fantastic compliance and fortitude in this period is a c8nt.
    Indeed. If I were in my late teens or 20s I would think "Fuck this virus" and go out and party. I would also try and avoid hugging elderly relatives, cousins with diabetes etc, but I would not stop living my young life to the full.

    Young people need to go out, have fun, fall in love, make babies. That's how humanity will survive, in the end, not by endless, life-crushing, economy-squashing quarantines that never really work anyway.
    We should have a 8pm Wednesday evening clap (ahem) for young people.

  • What role has Steve Baker got that he'd take over with what the PM was saying. He's just a backbencher isn't he?
  • We left at the right time didn't we Richard?

    Imagine being associated with this embarrassment.
    If I was in your (normally) brightly colours shoes, I think the admission of attending Steps and Vengaboys concerts would weight more heavily :-)
    I've not bought any new footwear since January, I need to rectify that.

    Doing the 10,000 steps a day challenge since well April, and I've worn away my current trainers.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,691

    FF43 said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Told you! He's going to blame Starmer.

    Starmer is a rather foreign sounding name is it not? Everyone knows where they are with a Johnson!
    Boris is a Russian-sounding name, no?
    I imagine it's a Russian sounding name because it's in fact a Russian name.
  • What role has Steve Baker got that he'd take over with what the PM was saying. He's just a backbencher isn't he?

    Yes, would guess he must have been involved in whatever strategy it is?
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.
  • What role has Steve Baker got that he'd take over with what the PM was saying. He's just a backbencher isn't he?

    Yes, would guess he must have been involved in whatever strategy it is?
    Yes that implies the plans are even more ERG-centric than they first appeared.
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.

    Theresa May was Chamberlain to Boris's Churchill.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    Sounds like the PM knows he's in trouble, by the time this gets to the house the rebels will be very organised and I doubt today's farcical meeting has helped. It looked like the Lord's would send it back but I wouldn't be surprised if MPs either amend it into something unobjectionable or just vote it down and defeat the government. The rebels need to start counting Labour to not abstain.
  • Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.

    Theresa May was Chamberlain to Boris's Churchill.
    Theresa May was the Duke of Grafton to Boris's Lord North.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265
    edited September 2020

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,451
    edited September 2020

    We left at the right time didn't we Richard?

    Imagine being associated with this embarrassment.
    If I was in your (normally) brightly colours shoes, I think the admission of attending Steps and Vengaboys concerts would weight more heavily :-)
    I've not bought any new footwear since January, I need to rectify that.

    Doing the 10,000 steps a day challenge since well April, and I've worn away my current trainers.
    I have the opposite problem. I bought a lovely "glow in the dark" pair of Metcons for Crossfit and haven't managed to get any use out of them. Just sitting on the shelf gathering dust.
  • Or is that just a sop to get enough MPs to support his plan for no deal. Who knows, not even Tory MPs themselves. Far from democracy the country is being led by a tiny clique with an opaque agenda. It was elected on a manifesto that promised an oven ready deal, which they now want to break the law to avoid implementing.
  • Surely Boris should have had this meeting with his backbenchers before, or at the same time as, tabling this Bill? The fact he's having it today suggests he's got party management problems and is not fully in control of events.
  • Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    Why? What's changed from when Boris won a thumping majority in the leadership election and the general election?
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    He's safe until he delivers Brexit.

    After that.....
  • I feel sorry for Gordon's laptop...

    https://youtu.be/zpsOquSlXIA
  • Scott_xP said:
    The Conservative Party is now a foreign power?
    In Scotland certainly...
  • LadyGLadyG Posts: 2,221
    Sometimes big companies get these things wrong. But this is a truly touching corporate gesture

    https://twitter.com/Shandypockets/status/1304430608152776710?s=20
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    Yep, tossing out their biggest election winner in decades nine months after his landslide would definitely not be a batshit-insane thing to do.
  • HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
  • This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265

    Scott_xP said:
    The Conservative Party is now a foreign power?
    In Scotland certainly...
    25% of Scots voted Tory in 2019, that means a quarter of Scots are not Scottish then
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,513
    Scott_xP said:
    His POV is irrelevant, surely ?
    What counts is the wording of the bill.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,823
    LadyG said:

    Sometimes big companies get these things wrong. But this is a truly touching corporate gesture

    https://twitter.com/Shandypockets/status/1304430608152776710?s=20

    Could have at least offered it from 9 until 11.
  • Surely Boris should have had this meeting with his backbenchers before, or at the same time as, tabling this Bill? The fact he's having it today suggests he's got party management problems and is not fully in control of events.

    Or that he considers Tory MPs so weak and spineless that they have no say in events. I think that is more likely (and probably correct).
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,513
    Scott_xP said:
    Legal expert Boris Johnson, who claims he didn't understand the treaty he negotiated, signed and campaigned on.

    Twat.
  • Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    Why? What's changed from when Boris won a thumping majority in the leadership election and the general election?
    Their flagship policy at the GE is now worth breaking the law to avoid implementing?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,154

    Blame the young is always the easy way out. Cowards.

    Right now young people

    cannot travel
    cannot associate in groups
    cannot afford to buy houses
    have big personal debts if they went to university
    Will inherit an enormous debt mountain from the boomers
    Pay then highest taxes in 50 years to fund the care of the elderly
    Will soon experience mass unemployment
    Missed a whole term of education
    Are having their development affected by mask wearing and other mentally traumatic events

    Its a dreadful, dreadful situation and anybody blaming them for their fantastic compliance and fortitude in this period is a c8nt.
    It's not that bad. They can still have sex, as long as it's not in groups of more than six.
    Well, that’s SeanT screwed then (or not, as the case may be).
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,691

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    I had you as older than 10.
  • Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    Why? What's changed from when Boris won a thumping majority in the leadership election and the general election?
    He has torn up an international treaty and trashed the conservative brand

    That is what has changed
  • Omnium said:

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    I had you as older than 10.
    I'm obviously 12
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265

    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea, however if you refuse to now support the party leader elected by the party membership and MPs and elected PM by the voters last year you are quite welcome to resign from the party and join the LDs or Starmer Labour.
  • We are headed into a second wave due to this Government's incompetence. Yet again we had foresight of other countries and we did nothing

    On this you are incorrect Horse

    If we are heading into a second wave this is consistent with the rest of Europe and all four nations have been taking similar action to mitigate the spread but it is clear that selfish and defiant behaviour by any including but not only the young are the biggest factors and there is behaviour is not possible to prescribe
    Blame the young time, Johnson told them to go out and party
    No he didn't. The police have spent all summer trying to close down parties and raves.
    He told us to all go back to the pub and live our lives as normal.

    The young are absolutely culpable but they cannot be held responsible for Government advice they were given.
    To go to the pub in a covid-secure manner, not to go to raves and house parties which is what is causing the spread.
    That is not the only cause of the spread. The young cannot be held 100% responsible.
    Not 100% but primarily responsible absolutely.

    And that's just a matter of fact not judgement.
    Prove it's the primary reason.

    Remember when you said the other day about the young voting Tory, this is the kind of thing I meant when you blame them for every problem
    You are now being silly.

    It is the experts who are saying this from the analysis of the data
    sound the 'quite' klaxon
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.

    Theresa May was Chamberlain to Boris's Churchill.
    More like Baldwin to Boris's Chamberlain.
  • Funny, they wanted the young to get back to the office just last week, now they're to blame for everything.

    This is the Tory way in a nutshell, never the fault of anyone over 50

    Nobody is "blaming" the young.

    Blame is such a perjorative term.

    The data says that the young are spreading the virus - in order to deal with this we need to know what's happening and react to it, not put our heads in the sand or cast blame. Its not a blame issue, it is just an issue of knowing the facts.
    It is also very clear that there's much more of a grip on where infections are coming from when they do follow up the track/trace.
  • https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1304467358556266496

    Philip assured us Johnson's deal didn't do this, oh well, wrong again
  • HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    No. I support tearing up this treaty.
  • Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    Yep, tossing out their biggest election winner in decades nine months after his landslide would definitely not be a batshit-insane thing to do.
    I think you are right, he is in effect dictator until 2024 or he decides otherwise. Even if the Tory MPs get a leadership contest, he will play the ultra Brexit card and win the following leadership contest with the membership pretty easily.
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.

    Theresa May was Chamberlain to Boris's Churchill.
    More like Baldwin to Boris's Chamberlain.
    Don't say that. He'll start calling the WA a piece of paper that gave us time to rearm.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265

    HYUFD said:

    So Barnier is now threatening to ban UK food exports to the EU if no trade deal is agreed, if the UK responds in kind better stock up on the brie and champagne and paella and pasta

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8721645/Gordon-Brown-blasts-Boris-Johnson-Brexit-plans.html

    He's not threatening anything of the kind. That is the default position in EU law. By definition, no deal means no deal. If there's no deal, we will by definition be a third-party country without recognition of our standards by the EU, and therefore under EU law, then specific and very well defined rules apply. These rules are not exactly a state secret, they are published on the EU websites:

    https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/official_controls/legislation/imports_en#:~:text=The European Union is a,products from the EU itself.

    Sane people have been pointing this out for at least three years, when the fantasy that we could crash out with no deal first started becoming popular with the nutjobs and then the Conservative Party as a whole.

    It really isn't hard to understand.

    As for us 'retaliating' by cutting off our own food supplies, well I suppose it might be good idea because it would lead to the immediate collapse of the government, and that might be the quickest route to sanity, starting from where we are.
    Tariffs may apply but banning UK food exports altogether is a different matter and our food complies to a high standard of production
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea, however if you refuse to now support the party leader elected by the party membership and MPs and elected PM by the voters last year you are quite welcome to resign from the party and join the LDs or Starmer Labour.
    I am going nowhere

    I will fight to regain the integrity of the party and see the end to the Boris Cummings disaster
  • Johnson admits as above, his deal he negotiated puts a border down the Irish Sea.

    @Philip_Thompson will you now admit you were wrong
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,691

    Omnium said:

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    I had you as older than 10.
    I'm obviously 12
    Brown's time was in my view the worst phase in recent years. I know nobody likes Blair, but he was a good PM.

    The 70s, Heath, Wilson, Callaghan were worse, by far, than anything recent.

    The coalition government with Cameron and Clegg was really good.

    May was good too - She will finish up rather unfairly and unluckily judged.

    Boris - few PMs have faced such a challenge. We'll see,
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,920
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea, however if you refuse to now support the party leader elected by the party membership and MPs and elected PM by the voters last year you are quite welcome to resign from the party and join the LDs or Starmer Labour.
    "He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea" that he campaigned for just ten months ago...
  • LadyGLadyG Posts: 2,221
    Interesting new perspective on Boris' tactics from the often very well informed Bruno Waterfield

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/09/11/the-eu-cant-handle-british-independence/
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    Just how young are you? You`re really pissing me off now.
  • Only Boris could make Theresa May seem like Churchill.

    Theresa May was Chamberlain to Boris's Churchill.
    More like Baldwin to Boris's Chamberlain.
    Don't say that. He'll start calling the WA a piece of paper that gave us time to rearm.
    He's not far off saying that.

    He's actually quite like Chamberlain in style. Every new fact which comes up and proves he's wrong is taken as a reason to think he's right. Like Chamberlain he ignores the warnings of the sensible. Like Chamberlain he is very conceited and thinks he has a special understanding of affairs which the civil service experts don't have. And in Cummings he even has his modern-day equivalent of Sir Horace Wilson:

    Lord Woolton recalled in his memoir that Wilson, "found himself enjoying tremendous power – in fact a power unequalled by any member of the Cabinet except the Prime Minister." On another occasion Woolton noted that Wilson left him after a dinner early saying, "I must go and look after my master: he's feeling very lonely just now".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace_Wilson_(civil_servant)
  • Stocky said:

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    Just how young are you? You`re really pissing me off now.
    Somewhere between 0 and 40
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea, however if you refuse to now support the party leader elected by the party membership and MPs and elected PM by the voters last year you are quite welcome to resign from the party and join the LDs or Starmer Labour.
    The fact that you have deceived (by your own admission) a handful of closet Essex kippers into electing you as a minor functionary does not put you in a position to speak for the party nor to suggest who should or should not belong to it. You are an admirer of Johnson who is not a conservative, but is a right wing populist shit. You are not a conservative but are a right wing populist ... let's leave it there.
  • Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    This is the worst Government of my - albeit, short - lifetime

    I had you as older than 10.
    I'm obviously 12
    Brown's time was in my view the worst phase in recent years. I know nobody likes Blair, but he was a good PM.

    The 70s, Heath, Wilson, Callaghan were worse, by far, than anything recent.

    The coalition government with Cameron and Clegg was really good.

    May was good too - She will finish up rather unfairly and unluckily judged.

    Boris - few PMs have faced such a challenge. We'll see,
    David Cameron was the worst Prime Minister since Lord North.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The Conservative Party is now a foreign power?
    In Scotland certainly...
    25% of Scots voted Tory in 2019, that means a quarter of Scots are not Scottish then
    What a disgraceful thing to say. You can't believe it, do you? But as I recall, the Tories claimed in November 2013 that any criticism of the Tories was moptivated principally by anti-English racism. I also recall that they shyt down that attack line very quickly when they realised what they were saying.
  • LadyG said:

    Interesting new perspective on Boris' tactics from the often very well informed Bruno Waterfield

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/09/11/the-eu-cant-handle-british-independence/

    That would be the same Bruno Waterfield who praised Boris Johnson for getting the deal and now calls it 'The Internal Market Bill clears up the ambiguity and the contradictions of the deliberate smoke-and-mirrors inherent in the Northern Ireland Protocol,'
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,265

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sounds like its time for conservative mps to start sending in their letters to the 1922

    You did not even vote for him in the leadership vote when Boris won 51% of Tory MPs and 66% of Tory members votes and he has a majority of 80 and still leads most polls, Boris is safe
    Dear me, do you not see just how he has just trashed the conservative brand by tearing up an international treaty

    He is shameless and needs to either resign or be thrown out
    He has taken action to avoid a hard border in the Irish Sea, however if you refuse to now support the party leader elected by the party membership and MPs and elected PM by the voters last year you are quite welcome to resign from the party and join the LDs or Starmer Labour.
    I am going nowhere

    I will fight to regain the integrity of the party and see the end to the Boris Cummings disaster
    If you continue your fight to undermine and attack the party leader you may not resign but you may find it is you being thrown out not Boris
This discussion has been closed.