FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
We have one too: an elderly neighbour diagonally across from us.
It results in the worst sort of community mistrust, suspicion and a breakdown of social cohesion.
The benefit of the doubt should be given unless the violation is flagrant and obvious and then, first, I'd politely raise it with my neighbor first to ask if everything was ok.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
Central command centre, ruthless purges, everyone an informer, Cummings really has a soft spot for Stalinism.
Is it Cummings driving this? I wonder.
Nothing happens in this government without Cummings's approval. The whole re-wiring project is all about that. And we know that Dom is very keen on control.
Basically, if you're supporting this government for libertarian reasons, you've been had.
As I have said the only problem Cummings had with an out of touch elite controlling everything was the He specifically was not it.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
Yes, I'm with you and, remarkably, BluestBlue as well. There's no comparison at all. I also see this largely as a matter of deterrent. Hopefully it will make folk think twice about having house parties ("the neighbours might grass me up"), so the amount of snitching necessary will be minimal. Of course, there will always be curtain-twitchers who phone the police about stuff, but we have those in normal times.
I'm also curious as to what Contrarian thinks the motive behind these new measures is. He's always angry about stuff, but I just don't see these restrictions as a government attempt to court popularity. What's in it for them?
Do you not see how legislating with such force to prevent an illness is a dangerous path to take?
Legislation to prevent the spread of Covid was clearly necessary, and has been implemented globally - even in Brazil and the USA, for example. I agree, however, that getting the force of that legislation right is a difficult balancing act. Despite what some say, we have never been under "house arrest". France has had significantly stricter legislation. Personally I haven't felt my civil liberties significantly curtailed. Although I'm an ardent opponent of the current government, I don't think the legislative measures have been unreasonable in pursuit of a reduction in the death rate.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
It doesn;t matter what the excuse is for breaking up public meetings, creating government snitch networks, imposing curfews and encouraging neighbours to betray each other. Every tin pot despot will find his own excuse.
The fact is, these things are being done.
The obvious thing to do is to report all your neighbours everyday. If we all do it then it becomes unworkable
I’m wondering if I can afford to get everyone in the 15 miles north of Durham a really good pair of binoculars.
That seems to be the way to ease these restrictions.
It really has gone too far now and requires civil disobedience on a huge scale. The rules as far as I can see boil down to....
1) If someone makes money its fine and safe to mix
2) If no one is making money then you mustn't mix.
The public aren't as stupid as Boris is hoping
I was going to report my neighbours but when I phoned the hotline they said I would have to drive 300 miles to Fife to complete the report.
Not Barnard Castle?
The town is full of sightseers.
Sight seekers, shurely? I’m told it’s *the* place to get an eye test.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Benjamin Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
What a ridiculous answer. No, I don't want them forming vigilante groups. Yes, I want them to inform the police if people are obviously breaking the law and thus endangering my vulnerable relatives.
I remember back at the start of this crisis remarking to a friend that the UK (and, in particular, my vulnerable relatives) are fucked because people are too bloody-minded and self-entitled to follow rules and too timid to challenge or report others breaking the rules. How prescient was that?
And who decides that they are 'obviously breaking the law'? Bitch next door was sure we were. She couldn't have been more wrong but you try telling a self-righteous little Nazi that. For the sort of helful informing you have in mind you need names, numbers, addresses and times. There's no shortage of self-appointed coppers out there with nothing better to do than spy on their neighbours so they can report them. The usual result is a lot of upset and the massive wasting of police time. You really want this?
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
Yes, I'm with you and, remarkably, BluestBlue as well. There's no comparison at all. I also see this largely as a matter of deterrent. Hopefully it will make folk think twice about having house parties ("the neighbours might grass me up"), so the amount of snitching necessary will be minimal. Of course, there will always be curtain-twitchers who phone the police about stuff, but we have those in normal times.
I'm also curious as to what Contrarian thinks the motive behind these new measures is. He's always angry about stuff, but I just don't see these restrictions as a government attempt to court popularity. What's in it for them?
Do you not see how legislating with such force to prevent an illness is a dangerous path to take?
Legislation to prevent the spread of Covid was clearly necessary, and has been implemented globally - even in Brazil and the USA, for example. I agree, however, that getting the force of that legislation right is a difficult balancing act. Despite what some say, we have never been under "house arrest". France has had significantly stricter legislation. Personally I haven't felt my civil liberties significantly curtailed. Although I'm an ardent opponent of the current government, I don't think the legislative measures have been unreasonable in pursuit of a reduction in the death rate.
It’s maybe worth remembering how strict the Italians got.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
We have one too: an elderly neighbour diagonally across from us.
It results in the worst sort of community mistrust, suspicion and a breakdown of social cohesion.
The benefit of the doubt should be given unless the violation is flagrant and obvious and then, first, I'd politely raise it with my neighbor first to ask if everything was ok.
Exactly. Our curtaintwitcher had every opportunity to speak to us first. It would have cleared the matter up in an instant. Last thing she was going to do though. She wanted to grass us up. Some people are just like that. They don't need any encouragement.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
We have one too: an elderly neighbour diagonally across from us.
It results in the worst sort of community mistrust, suspicion and a breakdown of social cohesion.
The benefit of the doubt should be given unless the violation is flagrant and obvious and then, first, I'd politely raise it with my neighbor first to ask if everything was ok.
Exactly. Our curtaintwitcher had every opportunity to speak to us first. It would have cleared the matter up in an instant. Last thing she was going to do though. She wanted to grass us up. Some people are just like that. They don't need any encouragement.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
What a ridiculous answer. No, I don't want them forming vigilante groups. Yes, I want them to inform the police if people are obviously breaking the law and thus endangering my vulnerable relatives.
I remember back at the start of this crisis remarking to a friend that the UK (and, in particular, my vulnerable relatives) are fucked because people are too bloody-minded and self-entitled to follow rules and too timid to challenge or report others breaking the rules. How prescient was that?
And who decides that they are 'obviously breaking the law'? Bitch next door was sure we were. She couldn't have been more wrong but you try telling a self-righteous little Nazi that. For the sort of helful informing you have in mind you need names, numbers, addresses and times. There's no shortage of self-appointed coppers out there with nothing better to do than spy on their neighbours so they can report them. The usual result is a lot of upset and the massive wasting of police time. You really want this?
Leave the coppering to the coppers.
I think a number of police forces said reports to them were largely baseless when this last happened in April.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
Yes, I'm with you and, remarkably, BluestBlue as well. There's no comparison at all. I also see this largely as a matter of deterrent. Hopefully it will make folk think twice about having house parties ("the neighbours might grass me up"), so the amount of snitching necessary will be minimal. Of course, there will always be curtain-twitchers who phone the police about stuff, but we have those in normal times.
I'm also curious as to what Contrarian thinks the motive behind these new measures is. He's always angry about stuff, but I just don't see these restrictions as a government attempt to court popularity. What's in it for them?
Do you not see how legislating with such force to prevent an illness is a dangerous path to take?
Legislation to prevent the spread of Covid was clearly necessary, and has been implemented globally - even in Brazil and the USA, for example. I agree, however, that getting the force of that legislation right is a difficult balancing act. Despite what some say, we have never been under "house arrest". France has had significantly stricter legislation. Personally I haven't felt my civil liberties significantly curtailed. Although I'm an ardent opponent of the current government, I don't think the legislative measures have been unreasonable in pursuit of a reduction in the death rate.
Maybe. What is the death rate at the moment? Not that I think a resurgence couldn't occur but the vast majority of people are not at risk and those that are will in any case take precautions.
I don't like the instructions to snitch even though I understand it is to prevent law breaking. But in this case as Boris came close to admitting, we are also being asked to accept some illogicalities in the restrictions so more leeway and trust should be employed.
I think this is bullshit from Trump. He'll be prepping.
No, I don't think so. He's making a virtue of necessity. I don't think he has the mental acumen to absorb the advice he is given, nor the humility to accept. He'll wing it, as he wings most things. It's worked before, he thinks it will work again.
I mean, it's not as if his core vote is hot on textual analysis.
I would prefer you to be right. If he tries to wing it there's a good chance of a disaster.
He can talk pure broken biscuits and his fans will lap it up.
Oh god yes. But another dettolgate will lose some of the few remaining undecideds.
Just logging back in. Have I got this right? Marshals will patrol our streets enforcing covid regulations?
What the hell happened to us? We've collectively lost our minds.
Agreed. But many on here think its OK.
I wonder how far this needs to get before they think things are not OK.
Usually by that stage it is too late.
How long before these restrictions need to happen every winter because of flu? Maybe that is too paranoid, but it something people should at least ask.
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
Hello again everyone. Been away a while. New phone.
I very much doubt Trump is skipping preparation.
What is everyone's headline prediction (12 words or fewer) for US elections? Broadly mine is 'Biden to squeak it because Great Lake states turn blue'.
"Trump out in Dem landslide but Florida stubbornly stays red".
That's about my take, though maybe less of the 'landslide'. It should be comfortable enough but Florida is different and will probably stay red.
Yes - decisive win would be a more accurate description. I'll be calling it a landslide though if I possibly can. ☺
If Texas flips, it's a landslide. Otherwise it's a normal win or a damn close thing.
I don't honestly think Texas will flip, but if it does the ECV distortion switches too. Instead of the ECV system favoring the GOP, it will then favor the Democrats. Cue bitter complaints about the system's unfairness!
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I’m less exercised about Brexit than about how shit a PM he’s proving to be.
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
EEA is Norway's baby so it will be a UK equivalent if it happens. Clearly worse than EU membership: you get all the constraints with none of the influence over things that matter to you. The opposite of "taking control". However if we accept EU membership is gone for good, which almost everyone does now, it is possible to have straight trade off between self interest of a close relationship with the rest of our continent and being able to do what we like as long as it's in isolation. I always assumed we would get to this point some stage. I am no longer confident that will be as the United Kingdom.
More likely it will only be as a United Kingdom, without Scottish MPs the chances of Starmer becoming PM and shifting to a softer EEA style Brexit are very remote, hard Brexit with a re elected Tories in England and Wales is likely
You may be too young to remember this, but the Tories have been crushed in England before, and opinions can move dramatically from one election to the next.
England-only 1992 GE:
Conservative 319 Labour 195
England-only 1997 GE:
Labour 328 Conservative 165
That was after 18 years of Tory rule, 2024 will only be after 14 years and Starmer is still more leftwing and less charismatic than Blair and Boris has a more robust culturally conservative coalition than Major did. Even Blair did not win most votes in England in 2005 and Blair is the only Labour leader to win a majority of seats in England since 1966
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Benjamin Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
So, Mr Churchill, you can take your blackout rules, and Home Guard, and rationing, and stick them somewhere.
I think this is bullshit from Trump. He'll be prepping.
No, I don't think so. He's making a virtue of necessity. I don't think he has the mental acumen to absorb the advice he is given, nor the humility to accept. He'll wing it, as he wings most things. It's worked before, he thinks it will work again.
Trump's own lawyers said that he shouldn't speak directly to the Special Counsel as he was incapable of doing so without perjuring himself. The guy says the dumbest stuff at the drop of a hat, and that's when he's not lying about easily verifiable things.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Why would I not inform the police about illegal activities that are detrimental to the well-being of my vulnerable relatives? What else would you turn a blind eye to? Burglary? Assault?
Funnily enough that is almost exactly what our next door neighbour said to us when trying to justify a snide remark about a trip we made to London. She was wrong in every material respect but of course facts and evidence don't bother your average curtaintwitcher.
As it happens, she's a bitch. There are plenty out there. How much encouragement you want to give such people? You want them forming vigilante groups? I promise you they'd love it.
What a ridiculous answer. No, I don't want them forming vigilante groups. Yes, I want them to inform the police if people are obviously breaking the law and thus endangering my vulnerable relatives.
I remember back at the start of this crisis remarking to a friend that the UK (and, in particular, my vulnerable relatives) are fucked because people are too bloody-minded and self-entitled to follow rules and too timid to challenge or report others breaking the rules. How prescient was that?
And who decides that they are 'obviously breaking the law'? Bitch next door was sure we were. She couldn't have been more wrong but you try telling a self-righteous little Nazi that. For the sort of helful informing you have in mind you need names, numbers, addresses and times. There's no shortage of self-appointed coppers out there with nothing better to do than spy on their neighbours so they can report them. The usual result is a lot of upset and the massive wasting of police time. You really want this?
EEA is Norway's baby so it will be a UK equivalent if it happens. Clearly worse than EU membership: you get all the constraints with none of the influence over things that matter to you. The opposite of "taking control". However if we accept EU membership is gone for good, which almost everyone does now, it is possible to have straight trade off between self interest of a close relationship with the rest of our continent and being able to do what we like as long as it's in isolation. I always assumed we would get to this point some stage. I am no longer confident that will be as the United Kingdom.
More likely it will only be as a United Kingdom, without Scottish MPs the chances of Starmer becoming PM and shifting to a softer EEA style Brexit are very remote, hard Brexit with a re elected Tories in England and Wales is likely
You may be too young to remember this, but the Tories have been crushed in England before, and opinions can move dramatically from one election to the next.
England-only 1992 GE:
Conservative 319 Labour 195
England-only 1997 GE:
Labour 328 Conservative 165
That was after 18 years of Tory rule, 2024 will only be after 14 years and Starmer is still more leftwing and less charismatic than Blair and Boris has a more robust culturally conservative coalition than Major did. Even Blair did not win most votes in England in 2005 and Blair is the only Labour leader to win a majority of seats in England since 1966
Would you say that the seeds for 1997 were setting in a few years before and to me it looks similar to that now on the Tory side? Tory poll lead has disappeared and Johnson is unpopular.
Starmer may be no Blair but he's as popular as Blair was - IPSOS
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
Boris is by far the most charismatic candidate the Tories have and plenty of voters switched from Labour mainly as he was leader.
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
Thanks Hyufd. That's Trump's best result on a day of many polls.
It is Rasmussen but would be 2016 2 if repeated in November, Trump matching his 2016 voteshare and Biden matching Hillary's 2016 voteshare (and Rasmussen to be fair did correctly get Hillary's 2% lead in the popular vote correct in its final 2016 poll)
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Benjamin Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
So, Mr Churchill, you can take your blackout rules, and Home Guard, and rationing, and stick them somewhere.
That is a completely false equivocation for one we were in a war where there was significant danger if those rules weren't followed and the rules werent
You must observe the black out and rationing unless someone will make some cash by you not doing so
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
Boris is by far the most charismatic candidate the Tories have and plenty of voters switched from Labour mainly as he was leader.
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
Any chance of some punctuation occasionally? I had to read that three times and my head now hurts!
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
Boris is by far the most charismatic candidate the Tories have and plenty of voters switched from Labour mainly as he was leader.
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
Any chance of some punctuation occasionally? I had to read that three times and my head now hurts!
I feel punctuation would spoil the essential HYUFD effect.
So considering the QC here is hardly a Brexiteer but is saying exactly what I was saying, from before I saw him say it, please tell me what he has got wrong here?
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
Best wishes for your family.
I despise curtain twitchers: you never know what's going on in someone else's household. If you're concerned about another family offer help and support not judgement.
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
Yes, Christmas and Birthdays etc they need family.
Lots of depressed patients today resigned and fed up by the news of increasing cases and tightening restrictions despite the beautiful autumn weather here. Its going to be a long lonely winter for a lot of people.
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
Boris is by far the most charismatic candidate the Tories have and plenty of voters switched from Labour mainly as he was leader.
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
Any chance of some punctuation occasionally? I had to read that three times and my head now hurts!
So considering the QC here is hardly a Brexiteer but is saying exactly what I was saying, from before I saw him say it, please tell me what he has got wrong here?
@Cyclefree ‘s question was whether you’d yet understood what was meant by the phrase ‘rule of law’. The tweets are not wrong, but also not relevant to the question.
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
Yes, Christmas and Birthdays etc they need family.
Lots of depressed patients today resigned and fed up by the news of increasing cases and tightening restrictions despite the beautiful autumn weather here. Its going to be a long lonely winter for a lot of people.
I don't get this all or nothing attitude. Nothing stopping them meeting one half of their family on one day, and another half on another.
So considering the QC here is hardly a Brexiteer but is saying exactly what I was saying, from before I saw him say it, please tell me what he has got wrong here?
@Cyclefree ‘s question was whether you’d yet understood what was meant by the phrase ‘rule of law’. The tweets are not wrong, but also not relevant to the question.
So changing within the constitution isn't relevant to the rule of law?
Odd argument. Seems to be confusing different definitions of 'freedom'. I'm free to go and stab someone, but just because the law can't physically stop me it doesn't follow that my act of free agency somehow takes some kind of moral precedence. What would the world look like if minsters weren't 'free' - in his sense of the word - to break international law?
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
He sounded fine to me but of course the left and those who do not want a hard Brexit want him to resign, though with an 80 seat Tory majority it would make no difference
I do want him gone but I think your party would benefit in the long run by him going as well, not just me saying that here either.
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
Boris is by far the most charismatic candidate the Tories have and plenty of voters switched from Labour mainly as he was leader.
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
Any chance of some punctuation occasionally? I had to read that three times and my head now hurts!
Odd argument. Seems to be confusing different definitions of 'freedom'. I'm free to go and stab someone, but just because the law can't physically stop me it doesn't follow that my act of free agency somehow takes some kind of moral precedence. What would the world look like if minsters weren't 'free' - in his sense of the word - to break international law?
It would be a very worrying and dangerous place as far as I'm concerned.
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
The rule of 6 is hilarious. "Yes of course you can still go to the pub, just not with more than 5 other people". Because its far safer to be close by someone you don't know than that 6th member of your own family. "Of course you can go to school" and all walk home together across the park. Just don't play football on the way home.
The rule of 6 is hilarious. "Yes of course you can still go to the pub, just not with more than 5 other people". Because its far safer to be close by someone you don't know than that 6th member of your own family. "Of course you can go to school" and all walk home together across the park. Just don't play football on the way home.
Why is it hilarious? If transmission is between strangers, reducing the number of strangers you meet surely helps reduce transmission overall?
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
This is truly horrendous.
As is the Mail’s front page online blaming young people for the new rules.
There is a creepy, sinister authoritarian bent to covidian policy.
Ominously, one of the 538 simulations is a 269-269 tie. Who thought an even number was a good idea?
What would actually happen in that situation? I mean, theoretically/constitutionally, rather than absolute chaos as the reality.
The House decides the presidency, the senate the vice presidency. But they do some type of bloc voting in the house where each state counts equal or something.
The rule of 6 is hilarious. "Yes of course you can still go to the pub, just not with more than 5 other people". Because its far safer to be close by someone you don't know than that 6th member of your own family. "Of course you can go to school" and all walk home together across the park. Just don't play football on the way home.
Re: christmas. The thing is that regardless of the overall COVID rules, the Government could easily, if it so chose, make an exception for Christmas and perhaps Boxing day if it so chose and announce it today. Given that most corresponding social activity will be shut down at that time. Few people in pubs/at work/in shops. On public transport. Schools on holiday. Given that the govt is constantly arguing that opening up the country represents trade offs between differing activities. Schools vs work vs pubs vs shops vs... etc
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
The rule of 6 is hilarious. "Yes of course you can still go to the pub, just not with more than 5 other people". Because its far safer to be close by someone you don't know than that 6th member of your own family. "Of course you can go to school" and all walk home together across the park. Just don't play football on the way home.
I'm not sure what alternative you would prefer?
Short of a complete free for all (which can be argued for) a line has to be drawn somewhere. If this is "hilarious" then where would you draw the line?
Odd argument. Seems to be confusing different definitions of 'freedom'. I'm free to go and stab someone, but just because the law can't physically stop me it doesn't follow that my act of free agency somehow takes some kind of moral precedence. What would the world look like if minsters weren't 'free' - in his sense of the word - to break international law?
I don't know what argument Maugham is replying to, but my reaction to his tweets is "So what?" Everything he says is perfectly correct, but it is also perfectly correct if you delete "legislation that breaches international law" and substitute "legislation for the extermination of the Jews."
Re: christmas. The thing is that regardless of the overall COVID rules, the Government could easily, if it so chose, make an exception for Christmas and perhaps Boxing day if it so chose and announce it today. Given that most corresponding social activity will be shut down at that time. Few people in pubs/at work/in shops. On public transport. Schools on holiday. Given that the govt is constantly arguing that opening up the country represents trade offs between differing activities. Schools vs work vs pubs vs shops vs... etc
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
More likely the way it's going the Government will encourage the big office Christmas party and night out to help the hospitality industry, and then ban the somewhat less lucrative smaller family gatherings in the house. After all, the restaurants and pubs etc. have magic "protocols" in place...
Odd argument. Seems to be confusing different definitions of 'freedom'. I'm free to go and stab someone, but just because the law can't physically stop me it doesn't follow that my act of free agency somehow takes some kind of moral precedence. What would the world look like if minsters weren't 'free' - in his sense of the word - to break international law?
It would be a very worrying and dangerous place as far as I'm concerned.
But you've nothing to worry about because governments are free, and will always be free, to break international law, in just the same way that I'm 'free' to go and commit murder. Of course, I don't do it for a number of reasons: moral scruples, fear of consequences, social opprobrium etc. International law has parallel reasons for not breaking it.
Re: christmas. The thing is that regardless of the overall COVID rules, the Government could easily, if it so chose, make an exception for Christmas and perhaps Boxing day if it so chose and announce it today. Given that most corresponding social activity will be shut down at that time. Few people in pubs/at work/in shops. On public transport. Schools on holiday. Given that the govt is constantly arguing that opening up the country represents trade offs between differing activities. Schools vs work vs pubs vs shops vs... etc
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
You'd then have to make exceptions for Eid x 2, Diwali, Passover, Ed Balls Day...
Re: christmas. The thing is that regardless of the overall COVID rules, the Government could easily, if it so chose, make an exception for Christmas and perhaps Boxing day if it so chose and announce it today. Given that most corresponding social activity will be shut down at that time. Few people in pubs/at work/in shops. On public transport. Schools on holiday. Given that the govt is constantly arguing that opening up the country represents trade offs between differing activities. Schools vs work vs pubs vs shops vs... etc
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
You'd then have to make exceptions for Eid x 2, Diwali, Passover, Ed Balls Day...
I thought, and still (marginally) think the odious Trumpton will win.
Yet when I did my map it showed Biden winning 270-268. My thinking was that Biden underperforms in PA but overperforms in AZ due to demographic change.
I posted my map on the previous thread. It’s surely too weird to actually happen??
Odd argument. Seems to be confusing different definitions of 'freedom'. I'm free to go and stab someone, but just because the law can't physically stop me it doesn't follow that my act of free agency somehow takes some kind of moral precedence. What would the world look like if minsters weren't 'free' - in his sense of the word - to break international law?
It would be a very worrying and dangerous place as far as I'm concerned.
But you've nothing to worry about because governments are free, and will always be free, to break international law, in just the same way that I'm 'free' to go and commit murder. Of course, I don't do it for a number of reasons: moral scruples, fear of consequences, social opprobrium etc. International law has parallel reasons for not breaking it.
Of course, most of the time it is good to not break it, but some of the time it is. When that is, is a matter of politics.
Sticking by a bad law just because its the law is no more acceptable to me than "only following orders" as to why you killed innocent people.
Re: christmas. The thing is that regardless of the overall COVID rules, the Government could easily, if it so chose, make an exception for Christmas and perhaps Boxing day if it so chose and announce it today. Given that most corresponding social activity will be shut down at that time. Few people in pubs/at work/in shops. On public transport. Schools on holiday. Given that the govt is constantly arguing that opening up the country represents trade offs between differing activities. Schools vs work vs pubs vs shops vs... etc
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
You'd then have to make exceptions for Eid x 2, Diwali, Passover, Ed Balls Day...
As some of you will know, my nephew died earlier this year during the lockdown, by his own hand. His parents were unable to help him because of the restrictions.
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
So considering the QC here is hardly a Brexiteer but is saying exactly what I was saying, from before I saw him say it, please tell me what he has got wrong here?
Because - briefly - Parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law are not the same thing.
You think, wrongly, that the first is the same as the second and the only thing necessary for the second to exist.
If you really want to understand this topic, I can only advise you to read Tom Bingham’s The Rule of Law, available in paperback for £7.55. Not a long book, very wise and elegantly written and as clear an explanation as you can get without needing to train as a lawyer.
FPT. There is a hitherto unnoticed sleeping army of "retired environmental officers?" Have they been lying dormant in some underground lair awaiting the call to arise!? This is like one of the non-Russell T Davies Torchwoods.
I am more perturbed by the "... neighbours are encouraged to inform on offenders ..."
FFS!
When did we become East-Germany-on-Sea?
That really is a stomach churning turn of phrase isn;t it? just awful.
As I say when the Gestapo did it, they were inundated. What's to stop people informing maliciously?
I warned about this sort of thing about a year ago when some of the madder pronouncements and proroguing was going on - about how we were becoming more and more fascist.
And here we are...
Yes, fascist regimes were well known for their characteristic love of community enforcement of public health measures during a pandemic. One of the defining traits of that political system in all the textbooks.
In agreement with you, possibly for the first time ever. The comparison between informing the police about events which are illegal and detrimental to public heath with the sort of stuff that went on in Nazi/East Germany is absurd (I have relatives who grew up in and escaped from the latter regime).
It always starts with the best of intentions...
Benjamin Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
So, Mr Churchill, you can take your blackout rules, and Home Guard, and rationing, and stick them somewhere.
Not sure blackout blinds infringes an essential liberty.
The rule of 6 is hilarious. "Yes of course you can still go to the pub, just not with more than 5 other people". Because its far safer to be close by someone you don't know than that 6th member of your own family. "Of course you can go to school" and all walk home together across the park. Just don't play football on the way home.
Unless one of your mates has the good forethought to sketch out a team sheet and formation on the back of his maths textbook. In which case, it’s an organised game and thus allowed.
Comments
It results in the worst sort of community mistrust, suspicion and a breakdown of social cohesion.
The benefit of the doubt should be given unless the violation is flagrant and obvious and then, first, I'd politely raise it with my neighbor first to ask if everything was ok.
Leave the coppering to the coppers.
https://youtu.be/KxtGJsnLgSc
And because they secretly dislike themselves too.
People are weird.
But, then, the Government weren't encouraging it.
Saw the presser.
...and by the way Mr Johnson, you are not "my Prime Minister". Who does he think he is? The Queen!
I don't like the instructions to snitch even though I understand it is to prevent law breaking. But in this case as Boris came close to admitting, we are also being asked to accept some illogicalities in the restrictions so more leeway and trust should be employed.
Like his book sales take precedence over the rest of the country....
I honestly think for his health he must be considering resigning, he looks terrible
The BBC used this one....
I don't honestly think Texas will flip, but if it does the ECV distortion switches too. Instead of the ECV system favoring the GOP, it will then favor the Democrats. Cue bitter complaints about the system's unfairness!
He doesn't look well, I don't see how you deny it.
The Deadline That Could Hand Trump the Election
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/trump-biden-electoral-count-act-1887/615994/
We are not sure on here that Boris knows what the rule of law means...
Starmer may be no Blair but he's as popular as Blair was - IPSOS
Sunak would only win back Remainers by switching to soft Brexit EEA but that means he also loses Leavers back to Farage and the Brexit Party that Boris would keep and if Sunak backed a hard Brexit under Boris after Boris went why would Remainers trust him over Starmer to switch to EEA anyway?
https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1303601637106298883
https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1303601638549184513
You must observe the black out and rationing unless someone will make some cash by you not doing so
As a family we have decided that they will not be left alone to bear their grief, especially at Xmas.
Just saving any marshals or curtain twitchers the bother of having to denounce us. Mind you, round here the police are as rare as wildebeest.
I despise curtain twitchers: you never know what's going on in someone else's household. If you're concerned about another family offer help and support not judgement.
Lots of depressed patients today resigned and fed up by the news of increasing cases and tightening restrictions despite the beautiful autumn weather here. Its going to be a long lonely winter for a lot of people.
............,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;;;;;;;;:::::::::''''''''''''''''''''''""""""""""""""""""???????????
Spread 'em around as you see fit.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/09/astrazeneca-covid19-vaccine-trial-hold-patient-report/
Not a placebo subject.
The tweets are not wrong, but also not relevant to the question.
As is the Mail’s front page online blaming young people for the new rules.
There is a creepy, sinister authoritarian bent to covidian policy.
But give people some advance notice so they can make their plans in advance. And stick to it. Give people something to look forward to. After all, the new year is likely to be pretty miserable. What with the constant diet of baked beans and long life bread.
Short of a complete free for all (which can be argued for) a line has to be drawn somewhere. If this is "hilarious" then where would you draw the line?
Lean Left / Loosely Libertarian / Largely Liberal
Are we really that rare?
Yet when I did my map it showed Biden winning 270-268. My thinking was that Biden underperforms in PA but overperforms in AZ due to demographic change.
I posted my map on the previous thread. It’s surely too weird to actually happen??
Sticking by a bad law just because its the law is no more acceptable to me than "only following orders" as to why you killed innocent people.
You think, wrongly, that the first is the same as the second and the only thing necessary for the second to exist.
If you really want to understand this topic, I can only advise you to read Tom Bingham’s The Rule of Law, available in paperback for £7.55. Not a long book, very wise and elegantly written and as clear an explanation as you can get without needing to train as a lawyer.
(Or more cheekily you can read this - https://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2020/03/11/political-rights-and-wrongs/ - which makes a similar point about Parliament, even as a law-maker, being constrained by and subject to, the rule of law.)