Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why the Johnson/Cummings “ignore the treaty” move sets bad pre

135678

Comments

  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    But only 18 Copies of one of Terry Pratchett's best early novels.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967

    Turns out Boris meant “half-baked” rather than “oven-ready”

    Are the two mutually exclusive. Depends how you cook something that's oven-ready, surely? :smiley:
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,929

    Johnson and Cummings were hoping Starmer would suggest we delay the transition period.

    He's learned the lesson of last year when the opposition let Johnson off the hook.
    Hillary Benn hasn't piped up.
  • Options
    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Look scary, but remember that the peak on the left was probably about 50x higher.
    This is the scary bit.

    In France, the number of hospitalisations increased by 30% in three days, and admissions in intensive care by 48%.
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
  • Options

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,225

    kinabalu said:



    He doesn’t need to win PA or Ohio.

    He definitely doesn't need to win Ohio, which wasn't that close in 2018. And there are routes to victory not passing through Pennsylvania.

    But Pennsylvania was the second closest Trump state in 2016 and has 20 delegates which is a big prize to miss. Biden also has a good claim to being local as he was born in Scranton. Put it this way - if we wake up the day after the election and Biden hasn't won Pennsylvania he probably (although I accept not definitely) isn't President.
    We won't be waking up on the day after the election because we won't have gone to sleep.

    Anyway - big Biden spread bet on supremacy with smaller hedge on the fixed odds Trump to hold Florida. That is me atm.
    It could be a few days before the results are in.
    Will Fox News hold off calling the states before the postal votes have been tallied - if not it could get violent.
    Well I won't be sleeping until the winner is clear. So I'm hoping it doesn't drag on too long. Reckon I can go 72 hours.
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
  • Options

    My French is rusty, is that hospitalisations not cases?

    Extremely worrying.
    The graph is showing cases and deaths, but the stats quoted are for the increase in hospitalisations and people in intensive care.
  • Options

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,225
    edited September 2020

    kinabalu said:



    He doesn’t need to win PA or Ohio.

    He definitely doesn't need to win Ohio, which wasn't that close in 2018. And there are routes to victory not passing through Pennsylvania.

    But Pennsylvania was the second closest Trump state in 2016 and has 20 delegates which is a big prize to miss. Biden also has a good claim to being local as he was born in Scranton. Put it this way - if we wake up the day after the election and Biden hasn't won Pennsylvania he probably (although I accept not definitely) isn't President.
    We won't be waking up on the day after the election because we won't have gone to sleep.

    Anyway - big Biden spread bet on supremacy with smaller hedge on the fixed odds Trump to hold Florida. That is me atm.
    It could be a few days before the results are in.
    Will Fox News hold off calling the states before the postal votes have been tallied - if not it could get violent.
    Sorry your question. No I'm confident that Fox will not behave as a Trump agent. They'll do things properly.
  • Options

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
    Yeah shit happens.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    alex_ said:

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
    It’s hard to imagine there will be larger groups than schools out there, although the hoops I am having to jump through on H+S grounds are beyond crazy.
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Personally, foreign travel for pleasure can go, but i think Carl Henigans suggestions on focusing on protecting the old, especially in care homes, is the real crucial strategy e.g. we need to move to a situation where we don't have any agency workers bouncing between homes.
  • Options

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    edited September 2020

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    Ah so you want to cherry pick the bits you like and not the rest. Also, as is repeatedly ignored, the NI Protocol which you and the govt now want to unpick was designed to avoid a border on the island of Ireland. There was a time when the Govt specifically said that this wasn't necessary because we could employ "technological solutions" instead. How are they coming along? Presumably ready to go.

    Otherwise there's a hard border within a few months. Probably put in place by us because of the massive gap in the UK's control of its own borders.

    This isn't just a theoretical change by the UK with no consequences.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,225
    kinabalu said:

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1303363781934936070

    Oh dear, the biggest Tory attack shut down, what will Cummings cry about now?

    Yes. We say to them Tories. This is boring. You said you'd get Brexit done so get it done. By the end of the year and not a moment longer. Do or Die for fucks sake. Grow a pair, get it over with, deal or no deal. Sort it Mr Johnson. Own it Mr Johnson. Then we can talk about more important things.
    Keir is listening. His Ch4 interview just now was exactly this.
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    And how do we ever get out of this cycle, each turn of which destroys more businesses and ruins more young people's education?
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,989
    You really are a pirate aren't you!
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    I see the whinger king is out in force today.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    edited September 2020

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    The WA - let alone the Act - do not expire after 12 months.
  • Options

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
    Yeah shit happens.
    I'm going to try that next time I end up in court.

    Law and order party, my arse - you look ridiculous
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    The WA - let alone the Act - do not expire after 12 months.
    It's a complete waste of time, just ignore Philip from here as I will.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,225

    Alistair said:

    Alistair said:

    Rasmussen with a 4 point lead for Biden in Ohio

    Lol.

    That’s a horrid poll for Trumpton.

    Absolutely awful.
    Do you think it is the massive corruption scandal engulfing the GOP there? The Kasich endorsementcof Biden? Or maybe Trump demanding a boycott of Goodyear Tyres (Headquarters Akron, Ohio)?

    I just can't put my finger on why Republicans are in trouble there.
    One thing that I have seen a number of times - a scandal/dramatic moment happens. The polls don't move immediately.

    Then a week of 2 later...

    The military thing?
    One would think that would have an impact. It was pretty grisly.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
    In fairness, the EU frequently break their own rules when it suits them. Eurobonds spring to mind. Or the ban on British beef.

    But the irony is, that’s a big part of the reason why we’re leaving them and here we doing exactly the same thing.
  • Options

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
    The UK is in dispute over two areas of contention.

    Fish - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Norway.
    LPF - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Canada.

    The EU is content to recognise Norway and Canada as sovereign equals on those issues and guess what, but they're both much smaller countries than the UK is economically.

    So no I don't except this 500mn nonsense. It is claptrap pure and simple.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    edited September 2020

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    And how do we ever get out of this cycle, each turn of which destroys more businesses and ruins more young people's education?
    A vaccine that reduces the infection to negligible levels.

    Unfortunately, it’s rapidly becoming clear that’s the only long-term solution. It always seemed likely, but now it’s pretty well certain.

    Or a mutation to something less deadly I suppose, but that’s not something we can altogether rely on.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,641

    Foxy said:

    30 UK Covid-19 deaths today is really shocking news. Could we be about to see the numbers really spike over the next few days and the possibility of a widespread further lockdown being introduced?
    The Government simply doesn't have a clue as regards how to deal with this problem.

    Shocking?

    https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/deaths
    Yes. You can see from that graph that 30 is the highest number of reported deaths for about 6 weeks and much higher then the tallies of the last couple of weeks. Last Tuesday, 5 deaths were reported, and only 12 were reported on the Tuesday prior to that. Alongside the rapidly increasing case numbers, it is an obvious indication that the second wave is starting.

    It would be good if we could actually take some early and decisive action, but I suppose we'll just dither and deny like the first time until mounting death counts again force emergency action :-(
    Hospitals are empty, Covid was on the death certificate of 1.1% of deaths w/e 28/8. Do you think we should lock down the whole country again with the untold disaster that that would bring to people lives? Today and everyday around 30 men have died of Prostrate cancer.
    How many have died of flu in the week that 30 have passed from covid?

    Based on the ONS figures around 900
    Though as flu is rarely confirmed by viral swab, can we be sure? Even if covid negative, there would be false negatives (around 30% of covid patients) and obviously excess deaths couldn't distinguish the two.

    In other words, were these 900 really flu?
    Is anyone dying of "flu" in the UK *not* being tested, at the moment?
    Yes.

    Those in hospital will be covid tested
    Those in nursing homes, probably
    Those in the community, maybe.

    Usually flu deaths are projected from excess mortality, and viral testing and serotyping at a representative panel of GP surgeries. Less than 5% of flu deaths get virologically tested normally.

    I don’t know how the national flu survey is functioning at the moment, but clearly the system is not so reliable when there is another fatal respiratory virus about.

    The February flu survey is how we know Covid-19 was not circulating in the community before the end of Feb, and how we identified some of the early community spread.
  • Options
    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
  • Options
    Barnesian said:

    You really are a pirate aren't you!

    " This is the day you will always remember as the day you almost caught Captain Philip Thompson!"
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    As soon as they think they can get away with it, as has truthfully been the case since 1713.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
    The UK is in dispute over two areas of contention.

    Fish - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Norway.
    LPF - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Canada.

    The EU is content to recognise Norway and Canada as sovereign equals on those issues and guess what, but they're both much smaller countries than the UK is economically.

    So no I don't except this 500mn nonsense. It is claptrap pure and simple.
    Boo hoo 😭 the EU won’t give us what we want 😭
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    The WA - let alone the Act - do not expire after 12 months.
    It's a complete waste of time, just ignore Philip from here as I will.
    ydoethur said:

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
    In fairness, the EU frequently break their own rules when it suits them. Eurobonds spring to mind. Or the ban on British beef.

    But the irony is, that’s a big part of the reason why we’re leaving them and here we doing exactly the same thing.
    If the EU broke a treaty with us Philip would be here crying outrage.

    With his view, he is now unable to talk about law and order matters ever again.

    In his words "shit happens"
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
    It's $3tn vs $14tn in GDP, there is a very good amount of deal to be done. Without all of the political bullshit the Canada style deal is a no brainer and both sides would be doing it. If anything a Canada+ with customs pre-clearance would be a no brainer, but I can understand there are significant trust issues that both sides would need to deal with and maybe even have customs agents at each other's major ports. However, pretending that the EU don't need a deal is actually for the faeries.

    Neither side wins from no deal, if anything the UK is probably better equipped to handle it due to having a shorter decision making process and being nimbler in a changing market, the EU has 27 different agendas to handle on trade policy, the UK doesn't, it has one and after Boris falls due to no deal it will probably have a pretty clear policy as well.

    The worst part about this assault on rule of law is that Boris jeopardising the only credible no deal economic policy of drawing in FDI with competitive tax rates and a friendly regulatory environment for business and investment. Foreign investors are currently taking fright at the UK's disregard for its own agreements.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    We hold all the cards and we are simultaneously throwing our toys out of the pram in outrage they wont meet our every demand.

    Funny.
  • Options

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    We signed a treaty, we're now going to undermine it. Presumably if the EU did the same you'd be crying foul
    Yeah shit happens.
    I'm going to try that next time I end up in court.

    Law and order party, my arse - you look ridiculous
    I don't pretend to be a law and order fanatic.
  • Options
    MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    rcs1000 said:

    MrEd said:

    MrEd said:

    HYUFD said:

    Alistair said:

    Rasmussen with a 4 point lead for Biden in Ohio

    Lol.

    Though only a 2% lead forecast for Biden in Pennsylvania by Susquehanna, both battleground state polls are still significantly narrower leads for Biden than his 7% national average poll lead
    And this on Florida - which posted below - saying that Trump is doing much better than 2016 in Miami-Dade https://outline.com/2TnybA
    The entire poll is based on 500 voters so it's silly to try and draw any conclusions from a subsample. Even the article says "Those [Hispanic] numbers — are based on smaller polling subsets with larger margins of error "
    Well, I have always said I have a problem with the quality of American polls.

    However, criticising a poll of 500 voters in Miami-Dade when people seem willing to accept without question the findings of a 1,000-2,000 national opinion poll across the US seems slightly odd.
    No, not odd at all.

    We should all know, for example, that approximately 55% of voters in Presidential elections are women. We should all know that around 28% of voters are Registered Republicans. We should all know that the young are less likely to vote than the old.

    If we have a poll without those crosstabs, then we have no idea whether its weightings in any way match the likely weightings of the electorate. Trusting a poll without knowing how it is constructed is taking an awful lot on faith.

    We also know how accurate - in aggregate - national polls have been in the past.

    They have been judged, analysed, pored over, compared, and rated.

    So, yes, I do trust the national polls more.
    That is fair enough. You and @SirNorfolkPassmore have educated me :)
  • Options
    MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Do you not see a contradiction between thinking that might is right and thinking that all sovereign entities are equal?
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    No. There can be no more national lockdowns. Local, possibly.
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    No. There can be no more national lockdowns. Local, possibly.
    If local is enough then that's fine, I am not so sure.

    But in local lockdowns, pubs, foreign travel being stopped/reduced, WFH is surely still to be encouraged/mandated
  • Options
    alex_ said:

    @Philip_Thompson do you admit now that the deal is rubbish or you still think it's good?

    I think it was ok. Better than Mays deal and good enough for the past 12 months so now we need to sort out the future.
    So then why change it? This is really poor Philip.
    Because the transition only lasted 12 months and then it expires.
    Ah so you want to cherry pick the bits you like and not the rest. Also, as is repeatedly ignored, the NI Protocol which you and the govt now want to unpick was designed to avoid a border on the island of Ireland. There was a time when the Govt specifically said that this wasn't necessary because we could employ "technological solutions" instead. How are they coming along? Presumably ready to go.

    Otherwise there's a hard border within a few months. Probably put in place by us because of the massive gap in the UK's control of its own borders.

    This isn't just a theoretical change by the UK with no consequences.
    Yes. I want to cherrypick the bits it is what the EU does all the time.

    Technological solutions absolutely could work instead so long as we remove the alternative.
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    Gibraltar is of course an interesting case in terms of abrogating treaties precisely because the first attempt the Spanish made to steal it back recapture it was based on a claim that the British were breaking the treaty of Utrecht.

    The cession which his Majesty [King Philip V] made precedently of that Place is become null, because of the infractions made in the conditions on which it was permitted that the English garrison should remain in the possession of Gibraltar; seeing that contrary to all the protestations made, they have not only extended their fortifications by exceeding the limits prescribed and stipulated, but what is more, contrary to the express and literal tenour of the Treaties, they receive and admit the Jews and Moors, in the same manner of the Spaniards, and other nations confounded and mixed, contrary to our holy religion; not to mention the frauds and continual contrabands which are carried on there to the prejudice of his majesty's Revenues.
  • Options

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
    The UK is in dispute over two areas of contention.

    Fish - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Norway.
    LPF - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Canada.

    The EU is content to recognise Norway and Canada as sovereign equals on those issues and guess what, but they're both much smaller countries than the UK is economically.

    So no I don't except this 500mn nonsense. It is claptrap pure and simple.
    But you're the one telling us that all is fair in love, war, piracy and international trade. There are no real rules, only guidelines.

    Rightly or wrongly, the EU have decided that they should demand more and give less to the UK than they did to Canada. (Fair enough really- proximity means the deal is worth more to us in cash terms than it is to Canada.) They have the sovereign ability to do that, and I'm not aware of any European politicians calling on Barnier to soften his stance.

    You want to play at the big table, it's big boys rules (or lack of rules, as you have noted). Don't be shocked when others do the same to you as you plan to do to them.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Personally, foreign travel for pleasure can go, but i think Carl Henigans suggestions on focusing on protecting the old, especially in care homes, is the real crucial strategy e.g. we need to move to a situation where we don't have any agency workers bouncing between homes.
    On that video you (?) posted last night Heneghan suggested putting staff in a bubble around each care home and paying them handsomely. Seems like a wise idea.
  • Options
    MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
  • Options

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Personally, foreign travel for pleasure can go, but i think Carl Henigans suggestions on focusing on protecting the old, especially in care homes, is the real crucial strategy e.g. we need to move to a situation where we don't have any agency workers bouncing between homes.
    On that video you (?) posted last night Heneghan suggested putting staff in a bubble around each care home and paying them handsomely. Seems like a wise idea.
    Certainly don't disagree with it. We have seen how the likes of cricket have done this bubble idea.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996
    edited September 2020

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    And how do we ever get out of this cycle, each turn of which destroys more businesses and ruins more young people's education?
    Exactly. We will have to live with the virus until we get a virus (or immunity). Care homes are a good place to focus our policy efforts.
  • Options
    Chris_AChris_A Posts: 1,237
    Foxy said:



    Yes.

    Those in hospital will be covid tested
    Those in nursing homes, probably
    Those in the community, maybe.

    Usually flu deaths are projected from excess mortality, and viral testing and serotyping at a representative panel of GP surgeries. Less than 5% of flu deaths get virologically tested normally.

    I don’t know how the national flu survey is functioning at the moment, but clearly the system is not so reliable when there is another fatal respiratory virus about.

    The February flu survey is how we know Covid-19 was not circulating in the community before the end of Feb, and how we identified some of the early community spread.

    We're not issuing any influenza testing kits at the moment and haven't issued any oseltamivir in months
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996
    ydoethur said:

    alex_ said:

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
    It’s hard to imagine there will be larger groups than schools out there, although the hoops I am having to jump through on H+S grounds are beyond crazy.
    According to my son, social distancing is almost nonexistent at his school, things are pretty much normal.
  • Options
    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    ydoethur said:

    alex_ said:

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
    It’s hard to imagine there will be larger groups than schools out there, although the hoops I am having to jump through on H+S grounds are beyond crazy.
    According to my son, social distancing is almost nonexistent at his school, things are pretty much normal.
    I think it varies widely from school to school. The problem is that the regulations were drawn up by people who do not understand schools, so they issued more or less impossible instructions and the question is, to what degree do you break them?
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607

    ydoethur said:

    alex_ said:

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
    It’s hard to imagine there will be larger groups than schools out there, although the hoops I am having to jump through on H+S grounds are beyond crazy.
    According to my son, social distancing is almost nonexistent at his school, things are pretty much normal.
    You can't have social distancing at a secondary school, especially a coeducational one. The government should be rolling out rapid testing machines at every single secondary school and university in the country for daily testing. Using them at carehomes is such a massive waste of resources.
  • Options
    CookieCookie Posts: 11,449

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    France where deaths are inching up but very much not rising exponentially? Things may change but France doesn't look too scary right now.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
  • Options

    We hold all the cards and we are simultaneously throwing our toys out of the pram in outrage they wont meet our every demand.

    Funny.

    Here in the UK, things are a little bit different.

    The Brexiteers are treated like the hop farmers of Alsace.

    They are idolised and adored.

    And why not?

    They are living legends.

    They are the men that came up with the noble Deal that makes Brexit the taste supreme.

    Woman: Excuse me, are you a Brexiteer?

    Me: Of course, oui!
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Seems like the arument during the referendum that the EU was a force for peace is correct.
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549
    RobD said:

    Look scary, but remember that the peak on the left was probably about 50x higher.
    Around 140,000 per day for the French peak.

    There is cause for concern across Europe, but these comparisons to previous months are extremely misleading.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
  • Options

    MaxPB said:

    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    FPT but more relevant here

    Fuck this lawbreaking government.

    Fuck them for shitting on this country’s reputation.

    One of the reasons this country attracts so much business is our strong rule of law and an independent judiciary that can and does overrule the government when it breaks the law/acts ultra vires.

    But today’s announcement and the plans to castrate the judiciary is going to screw this country so much.

    Well done Boris and the Brexiteers.

    and

    Also good luck to my friends in the UK Debt Management Office who have to sell UK debt with buyers now having to worry if the UK Government will retroactively change the terms.

    Tory backbench MPs with any conscience at all over what's right and what's wrong will surely vote down this crooked legislation, hopefully leading to Boris' immediate resignation as PM.
    Maybe this is an elaborately choreographed way to end up requesting some kind of further transition period. "We wanted to leave with No Deal, but yet again parliament wouldn't let us."
    This Government was elected on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement (as negotiated by Boris) and Boris's Oven Ready Deal.

    Starmers only question tomorrow needs to be what is delaying the Oven Ready deal being signed
    I'm sure Boris is on top of the details......
    He'll probably waffle on about lawyers and not taking any lectures from them.
    Should we just let lawyers run the world?
    We signed up to an agreement, we are now expected to uphold it. It can't get more simple than that.
    If it's in our interest to do so.

    If it's not we should if need be renounce it and move on.

    The EU aren't honouring their commitments in good faith so I don't care. Maybe next year we can revisit things but the UK government needs to look after the UK, the EU isn't going to do so.
    The UK looking after the UK involves sorting out a deal with our largest trading partner.
    Eventually. When they're ready to treat us as an equal sovereign neighbour and not a subject in their sphere of influence.
    But Phillip...

    The EU can only treat the UK as equal by denying the maths. 70 million people is less than 500 million. It would be profoundly unfair to the people living in EU states to pretend otherwise.

    You are clearly chilled about the consequences of no deal. Great for you. But the pretence that the EU could ever treat a single country as equal to a union of 27 is for the faries.

    You want a ballsy libertine pirate island. It's a valid view, albeit one I don't share. But argue for it honestly, rather than complaining when a larger unit uses the power they get by being a larger unit.
    The UK is in dispute over two areas of contention.

    Fish - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Norway.
    LPF - we seek to be treated as a sovereign country like Canada.

    The EU is content to recognise Norway and Canada as sovereign equals on those issues and guess what, but they're both much smaller countries than the UK is economically.

    So no I don't except this 500mn nonsense. It is claptrap pure and simple.
    But you're the one telling us that all is fair in love, war, piracy and international trade. There are no real rules, only guidelines.

    Rightly or wrongly, the EU have decided that they should demand more and give less to the UK than they did to Canada. (Fair enough really- proximity means the deal is worth more to us in cash terms than it is to Canada.) They have the sovereign ability to do that, and I'm not aware of any European politicians calling on Barnier to soften his stance.

    You want to play at the big table, it's big boys rules (or lack of rules, as you have noted). Don't be shocked when others do the same to you as you plan to do to them.
    Absolutely the EU can play whatever games it wants to do. That's fair. And guess what it already is doing so.

    All I'm saying is that we absolutely should be playing the same game too. That's the issue everyone here wants to "play by the rules" and "follow the law" and crap like that instead of playing the game properly.

    It's like playing cricket where the opposition is bowling fast paced Bodyline bowling and we are sending out batsmen without a helmet, without a cup, without anything protective because we are playing as "gentlemen".
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    MaxPB said:

    ydoethur said:

    alex_ said:

    France is a sign of what is to come, time for the Government to do something

    Like what? Another national lockdown?
    We should surely shut down pubs, stop foreign travel, encourage WFH
    Closing pubs could easily make things worse, driving social meetups into people's homes with less social distancing, and larger groups being impossible to police.
    It’s hard to imagine there will be larger groups than schools out there, although the hoops I am having to jump through on H+S grounds are beyond crazy.
    According to my son, social distancing is almost nonexistent at his school, things are pretty much normal.
    You can't have social distancing at a secondary school, especially a coeducational one. The government should be rolling out rapid testing machines at every single secondary school and university in the country for daily testing. Using them at carehomes is such a massive waste of resources.
    What was amazing is they thought it could be imposed in primary schools.
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Possibly. I thought Madrid was certainly in his sights.
  • Options

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Seems like the arument during the referendum that the EU was a force for peace is correct.
    Not at all. The EU never secured peace. Our own military and the threat of mutual destruction did.
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsokGIeQFFI
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    Cyclefree said:

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Possibly. I thought Madrid was certainly in his sights.
    He’s an equal opportunities nuker. Blow them all up!
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,855
    Evening all :)

    A mixed bag of State polling today. Certainly, some good news for Trump fans (or anti-Biden fans if you prefer) with Florida tied at 48 and Biden's lead in Pennsylvania down to just two.

    @rcs1000 made an interesting point on the increase of registered Republicans in Florida and were I a betting man, I'd be on to Trump to hold Florida. The Susquehanna poll in PA is also worthy of comment.

    https://susquehannapolling.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Toplines-PAStatewide-FallOmnibus-Sept2020.pdf

    It's a small sample - just 498 so the MoE is 4.3% making it a statistical dead heat. Biden's share is down four points since June while Trump's remain unchanged so the hapless Political Polls tweet is misleading.

    The move is 2% away from Biden but not to Trump and with only 8% undecided it's looking very close at this moment.

    The Rasmussen Ohio poll is very good for Biden - a 4% lead in a state Clinton lost by eight is a 6% swing so at the top end of what we've been seeing.

    Rather like yesterday's California poll, today's Missouri poll shows the second party doing disproportionately well - the swing to Trump in California is matched by the swing to Biden in Missouri which again supports the view both candidates are doing disproportionately well in the other's strongholds.
  • Options
    StockyStocky Posts: 9,718

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Seems like the arument during the referendum that the EU was a force for peace is correct.
    Not at all. The EU never secured peace. Our own military and the threat of mutual destruction did.
    Not "secured peace", no. It is a "force for peace" though, surely? It is difficult to get into a war with other nations in the same club. Seems to me that with Brexit we are making war more likely, if only by very small degree.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,282
    Just out from Prof Spector: We are now confident that this rise is statistically significant and that we are definitely seeing a rise in COVID cases in the UK. This is backed up by our R value, which is currently 1.2 for England, Scotland and Wales and 1.3 for Northern Ireland.*
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    edited September 2020
    Stocky said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Seems like the arument during the referendum that the EU was a force for peace is correct.
    Not at all. The EU never secured peace. Our own military and the threat of mutual destruction did.
    Not "secured peace", no. It is a "force for peace" though, surely? It is difficult to get into a war with other nations in the same club. Seems to me that with Brexit we are making war more likely, if only by very small degree.
    Even as a Remainer, I see this as a weak argument. The EU didn’t make or keep peace in Europe, NATO and the American nuclear umbrella did. Meanwhile being in the same club didn’t stop the American Civil War, the Taiping Rebellion, or numerous wars in Africa.

    In fact, several of the EU’s actions, especially their rather tactless attempts to expand into the Ukraine and the Balkans, have arguably provoked wars.
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
    It was Toulon for me to understand :lol:
  • Options
    Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 4,812
    I certainly think the types of local lockdowns that target household rather than commerce could be extended nationally or near nationally, if necessary.
  • Options
    Stocky said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    Seems like the arument during the referendum that the EU was a force for peace is correct.
    Not at all. The EU never secured peace. Our own military and the threat of mutual destruction did.
    Not "secured peace", no. It is a "force for peace" though, surely? It is difficult to get into a war with other nations in the same club. Seems to me that with Brexit we are making war more likely, if only by very small degree.
    No.

    War is no more likely. The only reason people are talking about it is silly arguments like TSE going on about the Treaty of Utrecht as if that meant diddly squat.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
    It was Toulon for me to understand :lol:
    Not bad. But I think Verdun with Napoleonic era puns.*

    *Yes, I know 1792 was revolutionary not Napoleonic.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    Australia making batting look dead easy here.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,124
    I think the real problem is that so many people are losing the will to live that there is very little incentive to comply with anti-coronavirus guidance.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
    HYUFD’s foreign policy primer:

    • Turn Antrim into an Orangeman homeland

    • Nuke Madrid

    • Deploy a fleet of armed patrol boats on the River Tweed
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
    It was Toulon for me to understand :lol:
    Not bad. But I think Verdun with Napoleonic era puns.*

    *Yes, I know 1792 was revolutionary not Napoleonic.
    You really need to know your Arcis from your Elba to make Napoleonic puns.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,996
    Are these rising cases matched by a rise in sickness?

    Heneghan seemed fairly sanguine yesterday.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
    HYUFD’s foreign policy primer:

    • Turn Antrim into an Orangeman homeland

    • Nuke Madrid

    • Deploy a fleet of armed patrol boats on the River Tweed
    Even though the Berwick border is north of the tweed
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,007

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
    HYUFD’s foreign policy primer:

    • Turn Antrim into an Orangeman homeland

    • Nuke Madrid

    • Deploy a fleet of armed patrol boats on the River Tweed
    Antrim has a Unionist majority, with every Antrim seat DUP, 98% of Gibraltarians voted to stay in the UK in a 2002 referendum and Scotland voted in a once in a generation 2014 referendum to stay in the UK.

    So just defending the will of the people
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
    It was Toulon for me to understand :lol:
    Not bad. But I think Verdun with Napoleonic era puns.*

    *Yes, I know 1792 was revolutionary not Napoleonic.
    Toulon was 1793!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242
    HYUFD said:

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
    HYUFD’s foreign policy primer:

    • Turn Antrim into an Orangeman homeland

    • Nuke Madrid

    • Deploy a fleet of armed patrol boats on the River Tweed
    Antrim has a Unionist majority, with every Antrim seat DUP, 98% of Gibraltarians voted to stay in the UK in a 2002 referendum and Scotland voted in a once in a generation 2014 referendum to stay in the UK.

    So just defending the will of the people
    Friendly advice:

    When a post suggests that you wish to nuke somebody, don’t pass it off as being ‘the will of the people.’
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,007

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The UK currently has the 8th strongest military in the world, Spain's military is only 20th

    https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,242

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    MrEd said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    Menorca was also British for a while :)
    We might get back the Ionian Isles. Corfu is British :)
    Oh and Corsica was a British Protectorate - um, for a couple of years :)
    Did we give it up because it was a bony part of the empire?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Corsican_Kingdom
    Groans gently as Sunil misses a truly awesome pun.
    "Corse" I didn't miss it, Napoleon!
    I even got the empire in there, Sunil.

    I am inconsulable that you didn’t appreciate it.
    It was Toulon for me to understand :lol:
    Not bad. But I think Verdun with Napoleonic era puns.*

    *Yes, I know 1792 was revolutionary not Napoleonic.
    Toulon was 1793!
    You and William are outsmarting me on these battles. I Moscow and brush up on my knowledge.

    See you later.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,007
    ydoethur said:

    HYUFD said:

    ydoethur said:

    Cyclefree said:

    So when do we expect the Spanish parliament to formally abrogate the Treaties of Utrecht and take back control of Gibraltar ?

    The moment their military is able to get past ours.
    It probably can do that already, assuming we don't nuke Madrid, following decades of Tory defence cuts.
    Oh for God’s sake: you’ll set @HYUFD off again! Wasn’t this his policy at one point?
    I thought it was to nuke Edinburgh?
    Edinburgh was tanks and Scottish infantry
    HYUFD’s foreign policy primer:

    • Turn Antrim into an Orangeman homeland

    • Nuke Madrid

    • Deploy a fleet of armed patrol boats on the River Tweed
    Antrim has a Unionist majority, with every Antrim seat DUP, 98% of Gibraltarians voted to stay in the UK in a 2002 referendum and Scotland voted in a once in a generation 2014 referendum to stay in the UK.

    So just defending the will of the people
    Friendly advice:

    When a post suggests that you wish to nuke somebody, don’t pass it off as being ‘the will of the people.’
    Defending British citizens at all costs is the will of the people, including those in overseas territories and we have military defences for a reason to protect them from foreign invasion.

    Though I highly doubt Spain is going to try and invade Gibraltar to test it, just as no nation is likely to invade the territory of the other nuclear powers like France, China, Russia and the USA
This discussion has been closed.