Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Undefined discussion subject.

123457»

Comments

  • HYUFD said:

    You are a hard leftwinger, if I have low credibility with you I am clearly doing something right as a conservative
    Hard left-winger lol, mainstream Nordic social democrat but not surprising, I suspect you think Blair was a Communist
  • About to retire for tonight but this is specially for Horse

    https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1296929490078236672?s=09

    Good night folks
  • About to retire for tonight but this is specially for Horse

    https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1296929490078236672?s=09

    Good night folks

    So it's happening then, thanks Big G and sleep well
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,306
    "No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria... NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn't go into a corona coma - and it's living in glorious normality. Now DOMINIC SANDBROOK asks: Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8652523/No-lockdown-no-hysteria-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-asks-Sweden-proof-got-terribly-wrong.html
  • How come Blair had the election in 2001 and not 2002?
  • And then in 2005 and not 2006?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,306
    edited August 2020

    How come Blair had the election in 2001 and not 2002?

    It used to be regarded as a bit desperate to hold on for 5 years, as if you knew you were going to lose and wanted to stay in office for as long as possible. On the other hand if you were confident of winning you held elections every 4 years. Both Thatcher and Blair did so, whereas John Major waited 5 years twice when winning was uncertain.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,351
    edited August 2020

    HYUFD is a grade-A muppet and has some worrying autocratic tendencies

    A bit rude, try toning down the insults.

    HYUFD is one of the good guy Conservatives. He is generally polite and his political antenna normally picks up the mood music in both the UK and the US.

    Some of his assertions can be startling, but one learns to filter those out and concentrate on the astute stuff.
  • kle4 said:

    I'm sure it will be like most Nolan movies - superb in all technical respects, but nonetheless overhyped.
    Nolan's movies are excellent film-making, even including "Following".
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,351
    Andy_JS said:

    "No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria... NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn't go into a corona coma - and it's living in glorious normality. Now DOMINIC SANDBROOK asks: Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8652523/No-lockdown-no-hysteria-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-asks-Sweden-proof-got-terribly-wrong.html

    No we didn't get it wrong.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    @Mexicanpete, with all due respect @HYUFD is not “on the pulse of the nation”. He knows nothing about the “red wall” other than his own predejuces and why would he, from his humble abode in middle class and metropolitan Epping Forest?

    As soon as “provincials” indicate they want anything outside the “hang em, Brexit” stereotype he’s built up in his head, he either dismisses it or doesn’t care.

    We are a one dimensional people to him and it’s patronizing as anything.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,409

    The fact that the weather in the Highlands is forecast to be utterly shite for the next few days has nothing to do with Boris's changed plans of course.
    Sunday looks alright. I'm hoping we get to climb Ben Lomond. Glad that we can enjoy the last week of our Scottish holiday with no risk of running into that awful man, anyway.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    A bit rude, try toning down the insults.

    HYUFD is one of the good guy Conservatives. He is generally polite and his political antenna normally picks up the mood music in both the UK and the US.

    Some of his assertions can be startling, but one learns to filter those out and concentrate on the astute stuff.
    Thankyou
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,607
    Andy_JS said:

    "No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria... NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn't go into a corona coma - and it's living in glorious normality. Now DOMINIC SANDBROOK asks: Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8652523/No-lockdown-no-hysteria-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-asks-Sweden-proof-got-terribly-wrong.html

    It'd be more compelling if Sweden had done great and we had done terribly, but economically and in mortality terms I don't see how that is true.
  • HYUFD said:

    You are a hard leftwinger, if I have low credibility with you I am clearly doing something right as a conservative
    You are NOT a Conservative - you voted REMAIN in 2016!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141
    Andy_JS said:

    "No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria... NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn't go into a corona coma - and it's living in glorious normality. Now DOMINIC SANDBROOK asks: Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8652523/No-lockdown-no-hysteria-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-asks-Sweden-proof-got-terribly-wrong.html

    Sweden still has the 5th highest death rate in the world and even Sweden did not ignore social distancing or the need to wash hands and use sanitised and Swedes were advised to avoid public transport
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,367

    A bit rude, try toning down the insults.

    HYUFD is one of the good guy Conservatives. He is generally polite and his political antenna normally picks up the mood music in both the UK and the US.

    Some of his assertions can be startling, but one learns to filter those out and concentrate on the astute stuff.
    Yeah, when things get personal on here it becomes unpleasant really fast. Let's just stick to politics.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,607

    And then in 2005 and not 2006?

    Most governments did not make use of the full 5 years available to them. Heck, we've only managed it once since it was made the default.

    I'd assume that the chances are you if you have a reasonable chance to win after 4 years, why take the risk of something coming up to reduce that chance by leaving it until the last possible moment?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    @Mexicanpete, with all due respect @HYUFD is not “on the pulse of the nation”. He knows nothing about the “red wall” other than his own predejuces and why would he, from his humble abode in middle class and metropolitan Epping Forest?

    As soon as “provincials” indicate they want anything outside the “hang em, Brexit” stereotype he’s built up in his head, he either dismisses it or doesn’t care.

    We are a one dimensional people to him and it’s patronizing as anything.

    You say that but Red Wall seats did not vote Tory last year for the first time since WW2 on a whim, or because they had suddenly become fans of austerity and cutting rich peoples taxes, they did so to deliver Brexit and all the Leave campaign promised
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,351
    edited August 2020

    @Mexicanpete, with all due respect @HYUFD is not “on the pulse of the nation”. He knows nothing about the “red wall” other than his own predejuces and why would he, from his humble abode in middle class and metropolitan Epping Forest?

    As soon as “provincials” indicate they want anything outside the “hang em, Brexit” stereotype he’s built up in his head, he either dismisses it or doesn’t care.

    We are a one dimensional people to him and it’s patronizing as anything.

    I didn't say Mr HYUFD was "on the pulse of the nation".

    He knows the Conservative Party extremely well. Post 2016 he has read Brexit and the blue collar admiration for Johnson well. I thought he was mad, and even against Corbyn, I assumed hard working, salt of the earth Britain wouldn't fall for Johnson's promises. I was disrespectful when he cited what I considered spurious polls. HYUFD was right, and I was very wrong.

    His knowledge of US polling, state by state is helpful for November.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    edited August 2020
    HYUFD said:

    You say that but Red Wall seats did not vote Tory last year for the first time since WW2 on a whim, or because they had suddenly become fans of austerity and cutting rich peoples taxes, they did so to deliver Brexit and all the Leave campaign promised
    They voted for a better life that they believe Brexit will bring.

    A finest example of your delusion is when I stated quite reasonably that no Brexiteer in the North East voted for Brexit with the intention or the desire of risking the Nissan factory closing.

    Now there’s no guarantee of that happening of course, but your reply was that it would be “their own fault” and that you didn’t care.

    Shows how much you understand red wall voters.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    I have been on here since 2005 and am known as Mr Moderate

    So I am now appealing on behalf of all moderate centre nice types like me, for the debate to move away from unpleasantness and instead to focus on the issues

    If this doesn't happen I shall feel compelled to move to another site where the debate is more civilised

    Possibly :lol:
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,351
    Ave_it said:

    I have been on here since 2005 and am known as Mr Moderate

    So I am now appealing on behalf of all moderate centre nice types like me, for the debate to move away from unpleasantness and instead to focus on the issues

    If this doesn't happen I shall feel compelled to move to another site where the debate is more civilised

    Possibly :lol:

    I understand the Hornet's Nest is good for a laugh.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    They voted for a better life that they believe Brexit will bring.

    A finest example of your delusion is when I stated quite reasonably that no Brexiteer in the North East voted for Brexit with the intention or the desire of risking the Nissan factory closing.

    Now there’s no guarantee of that happening of course, but your reply was that it would be “their own fault” and that you didn’t care.

    Shows how much you understand red wall voters.
    Nissan is in Sunderland which still voted Labour
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    Nissan is in Sunderland which still voted Labour
    You are clueless. Nissan workers and its supply chain live anywhere from Alnwick to Hartlepool.

    Regardless it doesn’t matter that Sunderland still voted for Labour in sufficient numbers to hold the seat, its Tory/Brexit vote was still the highest its been in many years.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,351

    Thanks to the morons on Twitter, Labour is now seen as more divided, well done cranks!

    I would be more worried by the current state of the nation than the current state of the Labour Party.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141
    edited August 2020

    You are clueless. Nissan workers and its supply chain live anywhere from Alnwick to Hartlepool.

    Regardless it doesn’t matter that Sunderland still voted for Labour in sufficient numbers to hold the seat, its Tory/Brexit vote was still the highest its been in many years.
    Hartlepool also voted Labour, Alnwick is solid rural, middle class Tory.

    If the Tories did not win Sunderland in 2019 to deliver Brexit they never will
  • RH1992RH1992 Posts: 788
    edited August 2020

    Thanks to the morons on Twitter, Labour is now seen as more divided, well done cranks!

    The majority of the nation does not live on Twitter thankfully. I speak to my news savvy friends about things such as this Twitter spat and they had no idea, and they also didn't really care.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    I know best on all things
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,367
    Ave_it said:

    I know best on all things

    Predictions for Bootle included.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    Hartlepool also voted Labour, Alnwick has always voted Tory.

    If the Tories did not win Sunderland in 2019 to deliver Brexit they never will
    You’re just spouting more irrelevant nonsense.

    The fact is you don’t understand red wall voters. You’ve created a stereotype in your head and that’s universally applied to all.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    You’re just spouting more irrelevant nonsense.

    The fact is you don’t understand red wall voters. You’ve created a stereotype in your head and that’s universally applied to all.
    No you don't, if you did Labour would never have lost them in the first place
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    No you don't, if you did Labour would never have lost them in the first place
    What has my understanding got to do with Labour?
  • IanB2 said:

    I am exercised by this because potentially it affects me, and is an example of our government making a series of futile and damaging policy decisions. If you want to sit in North Wales and take no notice because it makes no difference to you, so be it. But we can all see how your aborted stand against no deal Brexit looks like turning out.

    It is simply pointless and futile quarantine roulette. From a government that, just a couple of weeks ago, was actively encouraging people to book foreign holidays.
    I don't recall the government ever encouraging people to book foreign holidays. Saying it was possible is different to encouraging it.

    What is affecting you is the fact there is a lethal pandemic going on and quite frankly quarantining travellers is far less of a restriction on our liberties than shutting down businesses.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,367
    @Philip_Thompson I'm amazed anyone is contemplating traveling at a time like this. Won't be doing that until next year at the earliest.
  • HYUFD said:

    Both Trump and Clinton got 4% post convention bounces in 2016.

    I found the Trump convention far more exciting than the Romney convention which was like a widget makers conference.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/03/trump-clinton-unpopularity-2016-election-prediction-winner
    Actually, turns out yours truly was NOT all that incorrect (statistically speaking)

    Bounce for Trumpsky was more like +2% compared to +3% for Hillary

    Both were comparable with Obama's +3% in 2012, and better than Romney in at -1 (after hurricane & Clint Eastwood's chair).

    In 2008, Obama got a post-convention bounce of +4% which was less than +6% McCain got thanks to the (temporary) benefit of picking Sarah Palin for VP.

    Recent bounces compare most unfavorably with the Big Kahune: Bill Clinton's +16 in 1992>

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/21/joe-biden-convention-bounce-400083
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    Biden takes the presidency easily on those numbers.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    I just heard a rumour that Biden is 79. What's his running mate like?
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    edited August 2020

    Biden takes the presidency easily on those numbers.

    You're in big then?
  • RobD said:

    @Philip_Thompson I'm amazed anyone is contemplating traveling at a time like this. Won't be doing that until next year at the earliest.

    Is not the urge to travel and be damned in 2020 - eerily similar to the psychology of Americans who embarked on the Luisitania for a jaunt across the Atlantic in 1915, or Brits in Spring 1940 grumbled at not being able to catch the ferry for a dirty weekend in Dieppe?

    With the common link in all three cases inability to fully grasp that THIS IS WAR.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    Hartlepool also voted Labour, Alnwick is solid rural, middle class Tory.

    If the Tories did not win Sunderland in 2019 to deliver Brexit they never will
    Sunderland South was Tory -held 1953 - 1964. Paul Williams was the MP.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    edited August 2020

    Is not the urge to travel and be damned in 2020 - eerily similar to the psychology of Americans who embarked on the Luisitania for a jaunt across the Atlantic in 1915, or Brits in Spring 1940 grumbled at not being able to catch the ferry for a dirty weekend in Dieppe?

    With the common link in all three cases inability to fully grasp that THIS IS WAR.
    Idiotic. This bloke doesn't even know where he lives.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    edited August 2020
    HYUFD said:
    Tarheel State (that is NC) is the outlier in above series, seems low; perhaps sample is underestimating Black voter turnout?

    OR are rurals doubling down for Trumpsky?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    justin124 said:

    Sunderland South was Tory -held 1953 - 1964. Paul Williams was the MP.
    And Alnwick voted Liberal from the 70s until 2010.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141
    edited August 2020

    Actually, turns out yours truly was NOT all that incorrect (statistically speaking)

    Bounce for Trumpsky was more like +2% compared to +3% for Hillary

    Both were comparable with Obama's +3% in 2012, and better than Romney in at -1 (after hurricane & Clint Eastwood's chair).

    In 2008, Obama got a post-convention bounce of +4% which was less than +6% McCain got thanks to the (temporary) benefit of picking Sarah Palin for VP.

    Recent bounces compare most unfavorably with the Big Kahune: Bill Clinton's +16 in 1992>

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/21/joe-biden-convention-bounce-400083
    I believe the biggest post convention bounces in the last 20 years were Gore in 2000, then McCain in 2008 so a big bounce can get you back in contention but does not mean you will win. Dukakis in 1988 and Mondale in 1984 also got big bounces and lost.

    Clinton's bounce in 1992 was the biggest on record and he went onto win but he was also helped by Perot's withdrawal from the race that week.

    Carter in 1976 and Reagan in 1980 are also examples of big convention bounced which led to a win
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,306
    HYUFD said:

    Sweden still has the 5th highest death rate in the world and even Sweden did not ignore social distancing or the need to wash hands and use sanitised and Swedes were advised to avoid public transport
    One of the main questions is whether people in Sweden have been able to access their cancer and other treatments. A lot of people in countries like the UK haven't been able to do so because of the lockdown. I don't know what the answer is.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    And Alnwick voted Liberal from the 70s until 2010.
    It never voted Labour though so is not Red Wall
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141
    justin124 said:

    Sunderland South was Tory -held 1953 - 1964. Paul Williams was the MP.
    So what it voted Labour since then and still voted Labour last year so is not part of the Red Wall that went Tory
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    And Alnwick voted Liberal from the 70s until 2010.
    Local election results are more likely to be distorted by personal votes.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,306
    edited August 2020
    Trump's chance of winning the election according to the average of the various betting markets is currently 42.7%.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting_odds/2020_president/
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    justin124 said:

    Local election results are more likely to be distorted by personal votes.
    I meant the Berwick constituency.
  • HYUFD said:

    I believe the biggest post convention bounces in the last 20 years were Gore in 2000, then McCain in 2008 so a big bounce can get you back in contention but does not mean you will win. Dukakis in 1988 and Mondale in 1984 also got big bounces and lost.

    Clinton's bounce in 1992 was the biggest on record and he went onto win but he was also helped by Perot's withdrawal from the race that week.

    Carter in 1976 and Reagan in 1980 are also examples of big convention bounced which led to a win
    Re: 1992. Clinton was aided not just when Ross Perot left the race right before DNC but also when RP got back IN. In the end, he took some votes from Clinton BUT even more from Bush the Elder.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,306
    HYUFD said:

    So what it voted Labour since then and still voted Labour last year so is not part of the Red Wall that went Tory
    Sunderland South doesn't really exist today. It's divided between Sunderland Central and Houghton & Sunderland South. It would be interesting to ask the boffins how the old Sunderland South seat would have voted last year.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    Tarheel State (that is NC) is the outlier in above series, seems low; perhaps sample is underestimating Black voter turnout?

    OR are rurals doubling down for Trumpsky?
    North Carolina was taken pre convention, the other polls were taken 3 days into the DNC convention
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    It never voted Labour though so is not Red Wall
    It doesn’t matter. It was just more incorrect nonsense from you.

    My point was that Nissan (and its supply chain workers) live in all manner of constituencies, especially ones like Sedgefield, Durham North West, Bishop Auckland, etc.

    Therefore the fact that “Sunderland voted Labour” is completely and utterly meaningless.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    I meant the Berwick constituency.
    Certainly a lot of tactical voting for Alan Beith by Labour voters following his narrow win at the November 1973 by-election.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141
    edited August 2020

    It doesn’t matter. It was just more incorrect nonsense from you.

    My point was that Nissan (and its supply chain workers) live in all manner of constituencies, especially ones like Sedgefield, Durham North West, Bishop Auckland, etc.

    Therefore the fact that “Sunderland voted Labour” is completely and utterly meaningless.
    No it absolutely does matter and was absolutely correct, most Nissan workers live in the city of Sunderland itself.

    Sedgefield, Durham North West and Bishop Auckland are market town, rural constituencies in which the number of Nissan workers living there is a tiny fraction of those living in Sunderland at most
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    No it absolutely does matter and was absolutely correct, most Nissan voters live in the city of Sunderland itself.

    Sedgefield, Durham North West and Bishop Auckland are market town, rural constituencies in which the number of Nissan workers living there is a tiny fraction of those living in Sunderland at most
    You have no idea what you’re talking about.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,930
    edited August 2020

    The fact that the weather in the Highlands is forecast to be utterly shite for the next few days has nothing to do with Boris's changed plans of course.
    Utterly shite up there is grey with no wind, low cloud and a bit of drizzle. That's when the dreaded m*dg*s strike. There's no forecast for any of that.

    A wild wind with showers is great for photography and sea watching. I doubt he was planning on climbing any big hills.

    You don't go to Applecross to lie on the beach (although I have done so - it isn't the best beach up there but there is at least some sand).
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    You have no idea what you’re talking about.
    Even on the latest Yougov figures of Tories 40% and Labour 38% the Tories would hold Sedgefield and Bishop Auckland, only losing Durham NW
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    Even on the latest Yougov figures of Tories 40% and Labour 38% the Tories would hold Sedgefield and Bishop Auckland, only losing Durham NW
    Again, that is meaningless. We’re not discussing who they are going to vote for. We’re discussing whether you understand them and you don’t. You’ve simply been wrong over and over again tonight.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,930
    edited August 2020

    Sunday looks alright. I'm hoping we get to climb Ben Lomond. Glad that we can enjoy the last week of our Scottish holiday with no risk of running into that awful man, anyway.
    Later next week there might be some decent weather after a potential storm midweek.

    Tomorrow or _early_ Monday would be fine for a hill depending on your tolerance for taking a risk on whether you get a view or not, although perhaps my definition of 'fine' is coloured by doing most of my hills in winter.

    It looks cold enough for sleet on the highest hills (not Ben Lomond). Autumn is here...

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,141

    Again, that is meaningless. We’re not discussing who they are going to vote for. We’re discussing whether you understand them and you don’t. You’ve simply been wrong over and over again tonight.
    Oh I do understand them, your Labour Party do not, hence they lost them last year for the first time in about 100 years and still would not win all of them back now
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    HYUFD said:

    Oh I do understand them, your Labour Party do not, hence they lost them last year for the first time in about 100 years and still would not win all of them back now
    Whether “my Labour party” does or not is neither here nor there.

    You haven’t got a clue mate. You’ve demonstrated that over and over again.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 6,337
    HYUFD said:

    This government was elected to deliver the will of the people, judges are not immune
    While calling people grade a muppets isnt very helpful, is this the HYUFD who is supposed to be the acceptable face of the current tory party? Really?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Andy_JS said:

    "No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria... NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn't go into a corona coma - and it's living in glorious normality. Now DOMINIC SANDBROOK asks: Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?"

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8652523/No-lockdown-no-hysteria-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-asks-Sweden-proof-got-terribly-wrong.html

    Ah yes, the glorious normality of travel bans and closing down restraunts that flout the rules. That don't exist.

    Biden takes the presidency easily on those numbers.

    On those numbers he's taking Texas.
This discussion has been closed.