Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Food, Glorious Food!

1468910

Comments

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482
    ydoethur said:

    malcolmg said:

    Alistair said:

    Alistair said:

    I presume we blame the people pulling down the statue on Big Dom, right?

    https://twitter.com/thomdvorak/status/1269670547710980096?s=19
    Other than citizens of Bristol have been asked recently and they said they wanted to keep it.
    Time to move on.
    Time to get it out the river and restore it to its rightful place
    They’ll have to get it out of the water anyway. Can’t leave it there contaminating the harbour water.
    It needs to be put back exactly as it was, whatever its long term future. To do otherwise is replacing the rule of law with the rule of the mob.
  • Gabs3Gabs3 Posts: 836
    malcolmg said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    You can add one for the highland clearances
    The Highland clearances were done by Lowland Scots landlords to Highland Scots peasants.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999
    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I haven’t the energy to write about Police Scotland.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,357
    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Fox seems to be going all in with the “theatre’s answer to Nigel Farage” persona.
    The BBC, like Channel 4 News, does occasionally mimic Radio Pyongyang and it's relaxing to have one solitary luvvie to say so.
    It wasn’t of course the maiden voyage of the Hindenburg though. It had made 19 prior flights, nine to Rio and ten to New York.
    Have you read Empire of the Skies yet? It's a terrific history of the Zeppelins.
    Thanks for the tip
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620

    On topic, Covid-19 is widening the class divide. The middle classes are eating better, more local food. Those who struggle to make ends meet are seeing their choices deteriorate. The government doesn’t seem to be doing any thinking about this at all.

    Food poverty is more of a state of mind than wealth - its not difficult to eat healthily on a low budget if that is within your abilities and desire. The grotty takeaways which abound in deprived areas are not a cheap source of food.

    But you could add that the working class are less able to work from home which both puts them at more risk and means that quarantine restrictions on international travel will affect them more.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not having a trade deal with the US when we don't have one at the moment, but we still have a trade surplus with them, thanks very much?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,357
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I haven’t the energy to write about Police Scotland.
    greatest force in the west for sure, bet they had no shenanigans on Scottish marches , no statues defaced or destroyed here.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    On topic, Covid-19 is widening the class divide. The middle classes are eating better, more local food. Those who struggle to make ends meet are seeing their choices deteriorate. The government doesn’t seem to be doing any thinking about this at all.

    It is difficult to see what the government can do.

    Sixty of our finest British pounds gets one a handful of excellent produce from an artisan butchers. The same items, but generally tasteless, brine-injected, mechanically recovered shite from a well known supermarket will be yours for less than twenty quid.
  • novanova Posts: 692

    nova said:

    Regarding Alastair's thread, I think it is more class than racism.

    The middle and upper classes do well, and a lot of BAME aren't in those classes.

    My grandfather turned up in this country from a country far away and he was instantly a member of the middle class.

    Had he have been a manual worker working in the mills I'm not sure I'd have had the same life opportunities that I've enjoyed.

    It's also a matter of education and attitudes to education.

    The extreme example of this can be seen in the US. For example, very poor Chinese immigrants in New York have done very well in getting into the selective schools run by the state.

    So well, in fact that the Mayor of New York has discussed a quota system to "rebalance the intake" -

    https://www.ft.com/content/23308a34-bd2c-11e9-b350-db00d509634e

    In the UK at least I'm not sure that's true. It's a while since I've seen research in this area, but as far as I was aware education was taken more seriously in working class black families when compared with working class white families.

    The differences tended to be from attitudes outside the family - in particular from schools.

    IIRC correctly it became clearer with further segmentation of groups.

    "Black": is not a homogeneous culture - Ghanian culture is very different to Afro-Caribbean for example.

    I'd be interested to see that, as the research I saw was specifically for the Afro-Carribbean population. This was 20 years ago though.

    I wouldn't expect there to be huge differences with people from Ghana - although would more people from West Africa be first generation immigrants from middle class families? That was my experience through work, but no idea if it's true or just a stereotype.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    malcolmg said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I haven’t the energy to write about Police Scotland.
    greatest force in the west for sure, bet they had no shenanigans on Scottish marches , no statues defaced or destroyed here.
    Probably no police either.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,357
    Gabs3 said:

    malcolmg said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    You can add one for the highland clearances
    The Highland clearances were done by Lowland Scots landlords to Highland Scots peasants.
    acting for their English masters
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,720
    Alistair said:

    Nothing gets my goat more than the ludicrous historical revisionism that states that everyone was absolutely totally fine with slavery whilst slavery was happening.

    In reality there was massive pressure against it. Be it the British Empire or the fledgling United States.

    When you look at contemporary letters even a great number of the fucking slave owners knew what they were doing was morally reprehensible.
    Well, it wasn't until the late Eighteenth Century that the abolitionist movement really started to get going, after about 150 years of slave trading, but within a few decades the British slave trade was history.

    Why the sudden swing in British opinion?

    1) The Enlightentment, and in particular the radical ideas of the French and American revolutions, as well as very widely read British radicals like Thomas Paine.

    2) The widespread evangelical revival that swept Britain in late Eighteenth century.

    3) The Industrial Revolution meaning manufactured products rather than primary commodities were where the money was.

    4) The Haitian revolution. Bloody, barbaric and complex, but we lost more than 30 000 troops at the height of the Napoleaonic wars in a disastrous campaign to re-enslave the Haitian Jacobites. Once there was a free Black state in near proximity to Jamaica and the other sugar islands, the security issues for slaveholders became massive.

    So a conjunction of ideas, economics and security meant that by abolition in 1832 slaveowners were glad to be bought out by the government. That's correct, we paid compensation to the owners, not to the enslaved, and even forced them into indentured servant status afterwards.



  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,370

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I applaud the idea of a really thorough history of the British Airship industry.

    But you need to start earlier - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMA_No._1 really kicked off the comedy.

    The full story of the Nimrod MRA4 would also be good.

    As would the history of UK attempts at AEW&C radar planes. Hint - apart from an early mashup using a Wellington in WWII, every single attempt was an abject failure. Yes, I am aware of the smaller projects that worked such as Gannets and Sea Kings - but all the big attempts were a complete failure.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,720
    nova said:

    nova said:

    Regarding Alastair's thread, I think it is more class than racism.

    The middle and upper classes do well, and a lot of BAME aren't in those classes.

    My grandfather turned up in this country from a country far away and he was instantly a member of the middle class.

    Had he have been a manual worker working in the mills I'm not sure I'd have had the same life opportunities that I've enjoyed.

    It's also a matter of education and attitudes to education.

    The extreme example of this can be seen in the US. For example, very poor Chinese immigrants in New York have done very well in getting into the selective schools run by the state.

    So well, in fact that the Mayor of New York has discussed a quota system to "rebalance the intake" -

    https://www.ft.com/content/23308a34-bd2c-11e9-b350-db00d509634e

    In the UK at least I'm not sure that's true. It's a while since I've seen research in this area, but as far as I was aware education was taken more seriously in working class black families when compared with working class white families.

    The differences tended to be from attitudes outside the family - in particular from schools.

    IIRC correctly it became clearer with further segmentation of groups.

    "Black": is not a homogeneous culture - Ghanian culture is very different to Afro-Caribbean for example.

    I'd be interested to see that, as the research I saw was specifically for the Afro-Carribbean population. This was 20 years ago though.

    I wouldn't expect there to be huge differences with people from Ghana - although would more people from West Africa be first generation immigrants from middle class families? That was my experience through work, but no idea if it's true or just a stereotype.
    Black African migrants are often middle class and highly educated. In the USA, Nigerians are better educated, and earning more than East Asian migrants. I havent seen similar figures for the UK, but would expect similar.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/opinion/articles/2015-10-13/it-isn-t-just-asian-immigrants-who-excel-in-the-u-s-?__twitter_impression=true
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,798
    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    So just to be clear - you want to tear down every statue of Gladstone?
    I don't know a whole lot about Gladstone - wasn't he the one who used to hang around with prostitutes? Was he as unambiguously responsible for the famine as a man who ran the company that ran the slave trade was responsible for the slave trade? Did Gladstone do enough other good stuff to in any way balance his role in the famine? I don't know enough about this subject to have a strong view to be honest, you should ask Alenbrooke to enlighten you, the Irish angle was his non sequitur not mine.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999

    Foxy said:

    I seem to be the only person on here, broadly proud of the “Empire” (without which my home country would not exist), broadly sympathetic to BLM, a bit disconcerted to see a Grade II statue topple, but with an intemperate loathing of Trump and Johnson.

    I am “centrist Dad”.

    New Zealand was in theory settled by agreement*, and Maori rights protected in law from the beginning, so a bit different to other colonies.

    * yes, I know the treaty has been disputed from the beginning, and that there were three Maori wars as well as continuing land disputes etc.
    I think the modern tendency in this country to say the Empire was unredeemingly awful is regrettable.

    It was what it was, and once it became both militarily and morally unsustainable, it was wound up pretty quickly.

    I literally would not exist without the Empire, and although NZ is perhaps at one end of the spectrum when it comes to post-imperial states (and not without its own flaws), I tend to think the world is a better place with NZ in it.

    There are still Empires. China and the USA are both Empires. If we accept that, we can see that not all Empires are equal, and that perhaps Empires are an unavoidable element of human history.
    I wouldn't disagree with much of that. However since many of this country's highest accolades for achievement are literally centred on the British Empire, I think we've some way to go before reaching a plateau of rational and objective analysis of imperialism and our part in it.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Foxy said:



    Alistair said:

    Nothing gets my goat more than the ludicrous historical revisionism that states that everyone was absolutely totally fine with slavery whilst slavery was happening.

    In reality there was massive pressure against it. Be it the British Empire or the fledgling United States.

    When you look at contemporary letters even a great number of the fucking slave owners knew what they were doing was morally reprehensible.
    Well, it wasn't until the late Eighteenth Century that the abolitionist movement really started to get going, after about 150 years of slave trading, but within a few decades the British slave trade was history.

    Why the sudden swing in British opinion?

    1) The Enlightentment, and in particular the radical ideas of the French and American revolutions, as well as very widely read British radicals like Thomas Paine.

    2) The widespread evangelical revival that swept Britain in late Eighteenth century.

    3) The Industrial Revolution meaning manufactured products rather than primary commodities were where the money was.

    4) The Haitian revolution. Bloody, barbaric and complex, but we lost more than 30 000 troops at the height of the Napoleaonic wars in a disastrous campaign to re-enslave the Haitian Jacobites. Once there was a free Black state in near proximity to Jamaica and the other sugar islands, the security issues for slaveholders became massive.

    So a conjunction of ideas, economics and security meant that by abolition in 1832 slaveowners were glad to be bought out by the government. That's correct, we paid compensation to the owners, not to the enslaved, and even forced them into indentured servant status afterwards.



    We had already outlawed slavery within the bounds of the British Isles some time before.

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Foxy said:

    So a conjunction of ideas, economics and security meant that by abolition in 1832 slaveowners were glad to be bought out by the government. That's correct, we paid compensation to the owners, not to the enslaved, and even forced them into indentured servant status afterwards.

    Actually it was 1833, and it wasn’t put into full effect until 1837 (even that was a shortening on the original timeframe as it was meant to run until 1840).
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482
    Regarding @Cyclefree's thread, every word rings with truth. Barring possibly our spiritual health, there is nothing more important than the physical health of our citizens - economic considerations come second.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    edited June 2020

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    So just to be clear - you want to tear down every statue of Gladstone?
    I don't know a whole lot about Gladstone - wasn't he the one who used to hang around with prostitutes? Was he as unambiguously responsible for the famine as a man who ran the company that ran the slave trade was responsible for the slave trade? Did Gladstone do enough other good stuff to in any way balance his role in the famine? I don't know enough about this subject to have a strong view to be honest, you should ask Alenbrooke to enlighten you, the Irish angle was his non sequitur not mine.
    He was President of the Board of Trade, responsible for food supplies.

    The issue with Colston is that he endowed a huge number of public works and buildings in Bristol - paid for with money from slaving. Most of them are still in place. Should they be demolished? Because ultimately, pulling down a statue and yet leaving the practical effects of his life and crimes in place renders the whole thing more pointless than a broken pencil. Worse, it arguably helps airbrush the distinctly dubious foundations of those things from history.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,370
    nova said:

    nova said:

    Regarding Alastair's thread, I think it is more class than racism.

    The middle and upper classes do well, and a lot of BAME aren't in those classes.

    My grandfather turned up in this country from a country far away and he was instantly a member of the middle class.

    Had he have been a manual worker working in the mills I'm not sure I'd have had the same life opportunities that I've enjoyed.

    It's also a matter of education and attitudes to education.

    The extreme example of this can be seen in the US. For example, very poor Chinese immigrants in New York have done very well in getting into the selective schools run by the state.

    So well, in fact that the Mayor of New York has discussed a quota system to "rebalance the intake" -

    https://www.ft.com/content/23308a34-bd2c-11e9-b350-db00d509634e

    In the UK at least I'm not sure that's true. It's a while since I've seen research in this area, but as far as I was aware education was taken more seriously in working class black families when compared with working class white families.

    The differences tended to be from attitudes outside the family - in particular from schools.

    IIRC correctly it became clearer with further segmentation of groups.

    "Black": is not a homogeneous culture - Ghanian culture is very different to Afro-Caribbean for example.

    I'd be interested to see that, as the research I saw was specifically for the Afro-Carribbean population. This was 20 years ago though.

    I wouldn't expect there to be huge differences with people from Ghana - although would more people from West Africa be first generation immigrants from middle class families? That was my experience through work, but no idea if it's true or just a stereotype.
    Having actually lived with Ghanian people - the difference in culture is similar to the difference between, say, Finland and Italy.

    The difference in outcomes for all the indicators is large as well. Much of the progress made for the "black" population is from the more recent immigrants. The poor parts of the Afro-Carribbean community are still being left behind...
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    Gabs3 said:

    How long until right wingers tear down statues of Karl Marx? He must have more blood on his hands than almost anyone else.

    Plenty of ink on his hands, going by the amount of tedious drivel he turned out.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,935
    edited June 2020
    Foxy said:



    Alistair said:

    Nothing gets my goat more than the ludicrous historical revisionism that states that everyone was absolutely totally fine with slavery whilst slavery was happening.

    In reality there was massive pressure against it. Be it the British Empire or the fledgling United States.

    When you look at contemporary letters even a great number of the fucking slave owners knew what they were doing was morally reprehensible.
    Well, it wasn't until the late Eighteenth Century that the abolitionist movement really started to get going, after about 150 years of slave trading, but within a few decades the British slave trade was history.

    Why the sudden swing in British opinion?

    1) The Enlightentment, and in particular the radical ideas of the French and American revolutions, as well as very widely read British radicals like Thomas Paine.

    2) The widespread evangelical revival that swept Britain in late Eighteenth century.

    3) The Industrial Revolution meaning manufactured products rather than primary commodities were where the money was.

    4) The Haitian revolution. Bloody, barbaric and complex, but we lost more than 30 000 troops at the height of the Napoleaonic wars in a disastrous campaign to re-enslave the Haitian Jacobites. Once there was a free Black state in near proximity to Jamaica and the other sugar islands, the security issues for slaveholders became massive.

    So a conjunction of ideas, economics and security meant that by abolition in 1832 slaveowners were glad to be bought out by the government. That's correct, we paid compensation to the owners, not to the enslaved, and even forced them into indentured servant status afterwards.



    Wikipedia suggests the British were fighting with the slaves, against the French, in that war.

    Edit: Sorry, you are correct, the conflict seemed to involve many temporary alliances.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,798
    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,837

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    I can see both sides on the statue debates and dont really have a strong view. To play devils advocate and introduce a new line of thought:

    Were the Taliban wrong to take destroy the Buddhas of Bamyan statues? In their world view the statues represented evil and should therefore be destroyed?

    What is the principle that makes them wrong and taking down western statues right? Is it just that their world view itself is wrong (which I clearly think it is, but it makes the argument pretty flimsy).
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    isam said:
    What next? 'Librarian brilliantly explains why objectionable books should be burned'?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    to change the direction of UK politics

    after 4 years of politics Im amazed you dont get this
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not having a trade deal with the US when we don't have one at the moment, but we still have a trade surplus with them, thanks very much?
    Exactly! So please explain why we are even bothering to have talks with the USA. As things stand at the moment, we benefit greatly.

    Does anyone think that negotiating a trade deal with the USA will encourage them to give us even more money?

    Seriously?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    Sovereignty! We have regained our Sovereign nation status (which in reality we never really lost, but let's not be clouded by fact). Hallelujah!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,720
    ydoethur said:

    Foxy said:

    So a conjunction of ideas, economics and security meant that by abolition in 1832 slaveowners were glad to be bought out by the government. That's correct, we paid compensation to the owners, not to the enslaved, and even forced them into indentured servant status afterwards.

    Actually it was 1833, and it wasn’t put into full effect until 1837 (even that was a shortening on the original timeframe as it was meant to run until 1840).
    I am sure that your dates are correct, but would you agree with my overall thrust of ideas?

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652
    isam said:
    Statues aren't about adoration, who walks past a statue saying I adore that person? Loopy Twitter. What if I don't adore a rioter - should I rip down their house.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    "Brave" for a Conservative government to take on the combined might of the farming and animal welfare lobbies. But I think the Johnson clique is too much invested in a US FTA not to deliver the chlorinated chicken. For ideological reasons and because they are heavily bribedfunded by US interests
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    edited June 2020

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,620

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    Wasn't the Prophet Mohammed a slave owner ?

    Would you favour the closure of mosques because of it ?
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    Sovereignty! We have regained our Sovereign nation status (which in reality we never really lost, but let's not be clouded by fact). Hallelujah!
    :+1:

    Does it cook well? Can I eat it if I am hungry?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    It wasn't thanks to BLM, but looks like Stormzy ft P-Hitch could be a goer

    https://twitter.com/clarkemicah/status/1269533797604884480?s=21
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    Presumably the main point was to get out of the EU?

    They don't just have to walk away from a deal with the US, they can carry on talks for years (and probably would have to regardless, even if the process ultimately ends in success.) In the meantime, more modest but easier to achieve arrangements (e.g. Australia?) can be concluded as proof of progress.

    Relative to dealing with the fallout from Covid and throwing money at public services and infrastructure projects, trade negotiations are pretty low down the agenda for what's essentially a cultural centre-right/economic centre-left administration.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    to change the direction of UK politics

    after 4 years of politics Im amazed you dont get this
    I do get it. That is why they need that Trade Deal whatever it costs us.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,935

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not having a trade deal with the US when we don't have one at the moment, but we still have a trade surplus with them, thanks very much?
    Exactly! So please explain why we are even bothering to have talks with the USA. As things stand at the moment, we benefit greatly.

    Does anyone think that negotiating a trade deal with the USA will encourage them to give us even more money?

    Seriously?
    Isn't the purpose of a trade deal to facilitate increased trade? Both sides benefit from that arrangement.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    ..and the ones who pissed on /defaced the cenotaph should be doing lots of time in prison
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251
    The usual far left and anarchist groups that make up most of the troublemakers have chosen their timing brilliantly it has to be said. By drawing on a ready pool of naive, frustrated and bored young people as a result of the lockdown and then at least initially making themselves impervious to criticism from the woke mainstream media outlets because their cause has a superficial connection to the death of George Floyd they have had a virtually free ride.

    Unfortunately there is a sense of Rome burning while Boris fiddles. I suspect plenty of his 2019 voters are quietly and not so quietly seething at the weekend's activities and if the serial defacing of his own declared hero Churchill on the anniversary weekend of D Day can't rouse him off his flatulent arse then he will have made a further miscalculation to add his expanding list.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Two years later and the second plaque that was supposed to have been put up to point out what a horrific monster the man was still ahdnt made it, leaving just the glowing original description.

    The story of how people interfered to water down the criticism of Colston is... Interesting.

    https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/second-colston-statue-plaque-not-2682813
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482
    isam said:
    Without having watched the video (no thanks), the initial statement is given without any form of qualification and is one I totally disagree with.

    When I go to a city, I'm vaguely interested in the statues, who they are, what they did etc. I'm not adoring them. The only statues we 'adore' are war memorials, and they contain the names of common soldiers who gave their lives to preserve our freedom. All other statues, generals on horseback, local boys done good, Queen Victoria etc., are just there - we can look at them with a wry smile, a laugh, a sneer, or genuine admiration, it really doesn't matter. Once again, it's people elevating their need not to be displeased over everything and everyone else. It's narcissism, and it's not pretty.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I applaud the idea of a really thorough history of the British Airship industry.

    But you need to start earlier - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMA_No._1 really kicked off the comedy.

    The full story of the Nimrod MRA4 would also be good.

    As would the history of UK attempts at AEW&C radar planes. Hint - apart from an early mashup using a Wellington in WWII, every single attempt was an abject failure. Yes, I am aware of the smaller projects that worked such as Gannets and Sea Kings - but all the big attempts were a complete failure.
    In my primary school library there was a book called The World's 100 Worst Disasters or some such, it was a slightly weird compendium including the Paisley cinema disaster, the Indian Mutiny and the R101 crash. While the more alpha lads were kicking a tennis ball during lunchtime I'd pore over it, it was doubtless a formative influence.

    Would you say there was perhaps a culture of fuckwittery in some of the history of British aeronautics?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    Very right on of you - I am sure an un-checked mob would never go and do anything you couldn't live with, mobs are dependable like that.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    to change the direction of UK politics

    after 4 years of politics Im amazed you dont get this
    I do get it. That is why they need that Trade Deal whatever it costs us.
    No they dont. The country will function quite well without any trade deals under WTO. Trade deals just make it easier and sometimes they dont do that. To judge tariffs as the sole arbiter of success is nonsense. An economy consists of a lot more than just trade tarriffs.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    Sovereignty! We have regained our Sovereign nation status (which in reality we never really lost, but let's not be clouded by fact). Hallelujah!
    :+1:

    Does it cook well? Can I eat it if I am hungry?
    It is consumable raw or cooked. It has and is being consumed like fury for the last four years by the hard of thinking.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,935

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
    Cherry picking laws that they support? :D
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
    No. If the statue is to be moved in the long term, it needs to be decided by the people of Bristol. It needs to be put back, and the vandals who pulled it down need to be prosecuted. I understand there may be some video evidence.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,935

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
    No. If the statue is to be moved in the long term, it needs to be decided by the people of Bristol. It needs to be put back, and the vandals who pulled it down need to be prosecuted. I understand there may be some video evidence.
    It was decided, they decided to keep it.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    Norm said:

    The usual far left and anarchist groups that make up most of the troublemakers have chosen their timing brilliantly it has to be said. By drawing on a ready pool of naive, frustrated and bored young people as a result of the lockdown and then at least initially making themselves impervious to criticism from the woke mainstream media outlets because their cause has a superficial connection to the death of George Floyd they have had a virtually free ride.

    Unfortunately there is a sense of Rome burning while Boris fiddles. I suspect plenty of his 2019 voters are quietly and not so quietly seething at the weekend's activities and if the serial defacing of his own declared hero Churchill on the anniversary weekend of D Day can't rouse him off his flatulent arse then he will have made a further miscalculation to add his expanding list.

    I can just imagine the howls from the woke media (i.e. most of them) if Boris sent in the heavies as the vandals so richly deserve...
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    edited June 2020

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
    Breaking the law to violently impose your view on others when it has been rejected is never understandable.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,708
    An inflammatory intervention from Nigel Farage.

    https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1269705670670114816
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    edited June 2020

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
    Except I am not on the left. I have voted Conservative more times than for any other party

    :D:D

    I have voted Labour once, Green once and LD twice. All other times (excluding N Ireland) were for Tories.

    But that was back in the day when they were a fiscally responsible party instead of UKIP-lite.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not having a trade deal with the US when we don't have one at the moment, but we still have a trade surplus with them, thanks very much?
    Exactly! So please explain why we are even bothering to have talks with the USA. As things stand at the moment, we benefit greatly.

    Does anyone think that negotiating a trade deal with the USA will encourage them to give us even more money?

    Seriously?
    The US will offer minimal concessions for an FTA with the UK. So why is the Johnson government doing it when it will upset their own constituencies. Partly for ideological reasons. The EU doesn't have an FTA with the US. It signals the UK doing something different because of Brexit. Partly for reasons of cash provided for results delivered. A lot of money from US interest groups is going into the slushy research organisations surrounding Leave campaigns and Conservative MPs.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    On Topic: Boris and the Brexit Brigade will sign any deal the US puts in front of them and then lie through their teeth about it.

    Because what choices do they have?

    Not to bother if the deal doesn't suit them.

    No trade deals will be done at all, except in circumstances where they can plausibly be sold to the Tories' own voters. It's exactly the same logic as applies to the negotiations with the EU
    Except it will not work that way. Boris & the Brexiteers need to have a success to wave around, to show how we are free to sign trade deals.

    If they cannot sign Trade Deals after Brexiting then what the hell was the whole point of the thing?
    Sovereignty! We have regained our Sovereign nation status (which in reality we never really lost, but let's not be clouded by fact). Hallelujah!
    :+1:

    Does it cook well? Can I eat it if I am hungry?
    It is consumable raw or cooked. It has and is being consumed like fury for the last four years by the hard of thinking.
    Excellent post! :D:D:D:D:+1:
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
    Except I am not on the left. I have voted Conservative more times than for any other party

    :D:D

    I have voted Labour once, Green once and LD twice. All other times (excluding N Ireland) were for Tories.

    But that was back in the day when they were a fiscally responsible party instead of UKIP-lite.
    I don't see what part of that makes the illegal destruction of monuments ok, but whatevs...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    Wasn't the Prophet Mohammed a slave owner ?

    Would you favour the closure of mosques because of it ?
    You'll be waiting for an answer to that one for a very long time.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
    As I posted earlier

    "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."

    The left's law.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    Very right on of you - I am sure an un-checked mob would never go and do anything you couldn't live with, mobs are dependable like that.
    Yeah.. put a few more words in my mouth. My post QUITE CLEARLY states that "I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours"

    I did not gave them support for other actions.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    Wasn't the Prophet Mohammed a slave owner ?

    Would you favour the closure of mosques because of it ?
    You'll be waiting for an answer to that one for a very long time.
    Stars will go cold, the galaxy will spin off its axis...
  • CatManCatMan Posts: 3,060
    "Brexit: UK fears EU chief negotiator has lost grip on fishing talks "

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/07/brexit-uk-fears-eu-chief-negotiator-has-lost-grip-on-fishing-talks

    Don't forget ladies and gentlemen, that fishing makes up 0.1% of our GDP
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    An inflammatory intervention from Nigel Farage.

    https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1269705670670114816

    Interesting to note that Nigel's acts of vandalism are much more subtle. The irreparable damage to the fabric of the nation however, has been stark.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
    Breaking the law to violently impose your view on others when it has been rejected is never understandable.
    I think it's understandable when you see who's doing it.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,468
    malcolmg said:

    Gabs3 said:

    malcolmg said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    You can add one for the highland clearances
    The Highland clearances were done by Lowland Scots landlords to Highland Scots peasants.
    acting for their English masters
    in a totally self-disinterested way, I am sure ;)
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868

    Regarding Alastair's thread, I think it is more class than racism.

    The middle and upper classes do well, and a lot of BAME aren't in those classes.

    My grandfather turned up in this country from a country far away and he was instantly a member of the middle class.

    Had he have been a manual worker working in the mills I'm not sure I'd have had the same life opportunities that I've enjoyed.

    It really depends, my family arrived as manual workers (grandfather worked in factory, father in a warehouse). It took them about 20 years but eventually the family pooled its money and purchased a shop lease to sell jewellery and my dad trained as a chartered accountant after landing a job in a small firm.

    Asian families aren't scared of hard work and I think it shows in how successful we've become in this country, we hold two of the great offices of state, an Asian background chancellor was replaced with another Asian background chancellor.

    I'm sure your family put the same emphasis on hard work and education mine did when you were growing up and no amount of money can replace that.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    As I have said three times, because most black people in Bristol actually wanted to keep it for a number of good reasons that had nothing to do with admiration of Colston. And that has been overruled by a bunch of whites who think they know better than they do.

    And I am getting sick of trying to get this simple message across. This crowd are not heroes. They are not legitimate protestors. THey are certainly not protesting about the murder of George Floyd. They are violent, racist and anti-democratic thugs and scum.

    Anyone who defends them is defending that.
    I am queasy at statues being toppled, but it seems clear that Colston was a bad ‘un. He may have done a lot of good work for charidee, but so did Jimmy Savile.

    Can’t we agree that the statue probably doesn’t belong where it stood any more, and that toppling the statue, while regrettable, is perhaps understandable in this political climate?
    Breaking the law to violently impose your view on others when it has been rejected is never understandable.
    I don’t like seeing it. I think it’s vandalism.
    But part of me says that you can’t have a omelette without breaking some eggs.

    If an increased consciousness of structural racism means we have to live without the statue of a slave trader in central Bristol, then...seems a small price to pay?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Norm said:

    The usual far left and anarchist groups that make up most of the troublemakers have chosen their timing brilliantly it has to be said. By drawing on a ready pool of naive, frustrated and bored young people as a result of the lockdown and then at least initially making themselves impervious to criticism from the woke mainstream media outlets because their cause has a superficial connection to the death of George Floyd they have had a virtually free ride.

    Unfortunately there is a sense of Rome burning while Boris fiddles. I suspect plenty of his 2019 voters are quietly and not so quietly seething at the weekend's activities and if the serial defacing of his own declared hero Churchill on the anniversary weekend of D Day can't rouse him off his flatulent arse then he will have made a further miscalculation to add his expanding list.

    And how do we think Rome got built?
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    ydoethur said:

    One day, when I have time, I want to write a history of the British airship industry from 1917 to 1930.

    If so many people hadn’t been killed through sheer fuckwittery it would be one of the great comedy history novels of them all.

    Please sir, please sir, I can think of other periods of British history that that could be applied to?
    I applaud the idea of a really thorough history of the British Airship industry.

    But you need to start earlier - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMA_No._1 really kicked off the comedy.

    The full story of the Nimrod MRA4 would also be good.

    As would the history of UK attempts at AEW&C radar planes. Hint - apart from an early mashup using a Wellington in WWII, every single attempt was an abject failure. Yes, I am aware of the smaller projects that worked such as Gannets and Sea Kings - but all the big attempts were a complete failure.
    In my primary school library there was a book called The World's 100 Worst Disasters or some such, it was a slightly weird compendium including the Paisley cinema disaster, the Indian Mutiny and the R101 crash. While the more alpha lads were kicking a tennis ball during lunchtime I'd pore over it, it was doubtless a formative influence.

    Would you say there was perhaps a culture of fuckwittery in some of the history of British aeronautics?
    Yes. Sufficient idiocy that Frank Whittle had the design for the jet engine turned down in 1930 and so took the jet engine aboard to develop it. They even let him patent it in his own name! :D

    Also, Parsons and the marine turbine - it only succeeded because he rubbed the noses of the Admiralty in it publicly by steaming past them all at high speed at Portsmouth after they had turned him down.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    Wasn't the Prophet Mohammed a slave owner ?

    Would you favour the closure of mosques because of it ?
    Sure, why not?

    I'm going to file pulling down a statue to a slave trader in the same kind of category as driving to Barnhard Castle during lockdown - sure its illegal technically but I honestly couldn't care less about it.

    Its right not to have statues to slave traders in 21st century. Maybe the statue can be recovered and put in a museum somewhere but not out and about on display.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,378

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    You should set your weeping and wailing about British evil to one of the gloomier bits of Elgar.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100

    ydoethur said:

    Amazing all the labourites cheering on criminal behaviour. Remember their outrage at Big Dom behaviour and.claims he would encourage the dangerous behaviour by the public.

    Now we literally have labourites advocating forget covid (that think that disproportionately kills BAME individuals) and get into mobs to go smash shit up.

    Lots of stuff used to be illegal that shouldn't have been. Some stuff is still illegal that shouldn't be. Sometimes doing what's right matters more than obeying the law. Plenty of stuff would never have changed if nobody had been willing to break the law.
    A statue of a man who became wealthy on the bloody murder of the slave trade should have been taken down years ago. If this was the only way to get it done, I am happy to applaud it.
    So give me an apology for your role in the Irish Potato Famine.

    Now.
    Are you drinking already? That doesn't even make sense.
    Irish Lives Matter

    though not to you it seems
    I would happily endorse the removal of any statues of British people who played any role in the Irish famine. It was a monstrous crime and another example of our problematic history. The Atlantic slave economy and the plantations at their core built on the British colonial experiment in Ireland, as you know, so the two issues are of course related. Since I am part Irish I'm certainly not going to deny that Irish lives matter, I'd like to see them mattering a whole lot more, in a united Ireland by consent. I'm just a bit confused as to why you are bringing it up since we weren't talking about it.
    ]Because you asking people to apolgise for evernts outside there experience is as logical as me holding you responsible for potato blight.
    When did I ask anybody to apologise? I am just glad that a man who profited from the greatest crime in the history of humanity is no longer being honoured with a statue in one of our cities. I am genuinely surprised that is a controversial view, TBH.
    You are genuinely surprised that a bunch of white extremists telling the people of Bristol what statues they can and can’t have because of their own particular views on how people should respond to race and racism is controversial?

    It’s a view.
    Yes it is surprising to me. The guy is a mass murderer, the statue should have been removed years ago.
    Like I say, the crowd I saw was mixed, but I don't know why the race of the people involved is important.
    Wasn't the Prophet Mohammed a slave owner ?

    Would you favour the closure of mosques because of it ?
    You'll be waiting for an answer to that one for a very long time.
    Aren't arabs the slaver trader's slave traders? It was and still is a long supply chain.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    CatMan said:

    "Brexit: UK fears EU chief negotiator has lost grip on fishing talks "

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/07/brexit-uk-fears-eu-chief-negotiator-has-lost-grip-on-fishing-talks

    Don't forget ladies and gentlemen, that fishing makes up 0.1% of our GDP

    Throwing the “fisherpeople” under the bus in 1973 was perhaps where modern Euroscepticism started.

    It may be insignificant, but it seems offends a sense of fair play. The EU would do well to cave on this in exchange for British compromise on level playing field etc.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,482

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    Very right on of you - I am sure an un-checked mob would never go and do anything you couldn't live with, mobs are dependable like that.
    Yeah.. put a few more words in my mouth. My post QUITE CLEARLY states that "I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours"

    I did not gave them support for other actions.
    You quite clearly gave them support to vandalise a public building that they objected to. If you do that, what authority do you think you then have to say 'Ok, ok, hold up lads, that statue was fine, these shops, not fine.'. Your liking or otherwise for the particular statue is immaterial. You don't give your consent to mob rule, full stop, end of. And if you do, you accept whatever consequences come.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,468
    MaxPB said:

    Regarding Alastair's thread, I think it is more class than racism.

    The middle and upper classes do well, and a lot of BAME aren't in those classes.

    My grandfather turned up in this country from a country far away and he was instantly a member of the middle class.

    Had he have been a manual worker working in the mills I'm not sure I'd have had the same life opportunities that I've enjoyed.

    It really depends, my family arrived as manual workers (grandfather worked in factory, father in a warehouse). It took them about 20 years but eventually the family pooled its money and purchased a shop lease to sell jewellery and my dad trained as a chartered accountant after landing a job in a small firm.

    Asian families aren't scared of hard work and I think it shows in how successful we've become in this country, we hold two of the great offices of state, an Asian background chancellor was replaced with another Asian background chancellor.

    I'm sure your family put the same emphasis on hard work and education mine did when you were growing up and no amount of money can replace that.
    I think that is the true beauty of the video that Alastair posted - that you can get outcomes that hit one race/minorities hard without the causes being racist.

    However, I think you could justifiably argue that a society that notices those unfair outcomes and does nothing about it is racist.
  • alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    Very right on of you - I am sure an un-checked mob would never go and do anything you couldn't live with, mobs are dependable like that.
    Yeah.. put a few more words in my mouth. My post QUITE CLEARLY states that "I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours"

    I did not gave them support for other actions.
    I'm sure they'll note the restrictive nature of your support.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    alterego said:

    Andy_JS said:
    I can live with teh UK Taliban chucking statues of slave traders into harbours. I can doubly live with it if Farage does not like it ...

    Chuck another few statues in :+1::+1:
    And there go the left's pretensions to any belief in the rule of law. Oh well, I guess we can just ignore them on that topic for the foreseeable future...
    As I posted earlier

    "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."

    The left's law.
    Sinn Fein's actually.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    HYUFD said:
    I think Priti is dreadful, but if she goes it ends all doubt that Cummings is the de facto Prime Minister.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    CatMan said:

    "Brexit: UK fears EU chief negotiator has lost grip on fishing talks "

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/07/brexit-uk-fears-eu-chief-negotiator-has-lost-grip-on-fishing-talks

    Don't forget ladies and gentlemen, that fishing makes up 0.1% of our GDP

    Throwing the “fisherpeople” under the bus in 1973 was perhaps where modern Euroscepticism started.

    It may be insignificant, but it seems offends a sense of fair play. The EU would do well to cave on this in exchange for British compromise on level playing field etc.
    Euroscepticism started well before 1973.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298

    CatMan said:

    "Brexit: UK fears EU chief negotiator has lost grip on fishing talks "

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/07/brexit-uk-fears-eu-chief-negotiator-has-lost-grip-on-fishing-talks

    Don't forget ladies and gentlemen, that fishing makes up 0.1% of our GDP

    Throwing the “fisherpeople” under the bus in 1973 was perhaps where modern Euroscepticism started.

    It may be insignificant, but it seems offends a sense of fair play. The EU would do well to cave on this in exchange for British compromise on level playing field etc.
    Euroscepticism started well before 1973.
    Modern, Alanbrooke. Modern.
    I appreciate modernity is a foreign concept to you.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    An inflammatory intervention from Nigel Farage.

    https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1269705670670114816

    Slavers no more represent "my race" than Jimmy Saville did. Farage can go f**k himself with a rusty screwdriver as far as I'm concerned with this post.

    If there's going to be a riot between those pro-slavery and those anti-slavery I'll stand on the anti-slavery side thank you very much.
    Good grief!!!! We are in agreement.

    I am shocked :open_mouth:
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,139

    HYUFD said:
    I think Priti is dreadful, but if she goes it ends all doubt that Cummings is the de facto Prime Minister.
    It also means both Remainers and hard Brexiteers within the Tory Party will be enemies of Cummings, Cummings can beat off one of those factions, both however is much more difficult
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,102
    HYUFD said:
    I very much doubt Patel will go but as for JRM the sooner the better
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766

    An inflammatory intervention from Nigel Farage.

    https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1269705670670114816

    Slavers no more represent "my race" than Jimmy Saville did. Farage can go f**k himself with a rusty screwdriver as far as I'm concerned with this post.

    If there's going to be a riot between those pro-slavery and those anti-slavery I'll stand on the anti-slavery side thank you very much.
    Farage is ever more desperate for relevance. He clearly can't abide not having the daily fix of being on TV or radio.

    Desperate and pathetic.
This discussion has been closed.