Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Your regular reminder that hypothetical polls can be as accura

SystemSystem Posts: 12,170
edited December 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Your regular reminder that hypothetical polls can be as accurate as an American war film

Westminster voting intention…

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,864
    Indeed.
  • Agree.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,291
    edited December 2019
    I always thought the idea there would be a Con collapse after 31/10/19 if we didn't Brexit was wishful drinking from Remain....

    Oh and good afternoon PB :)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,864
    FWIW I now expect the polls to stabilise a bit. I think that the Labour vote has probably peaked and the Tory lead will stay around the 10% mark until election day.

    This hypothetical polling prediction is of course as equally valuable as the example in the header.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,291
    DavidL said:

    FWIW I now expect the polls to stabilise a bit. I think that the Labour vote has probably peaked and the Tory lead will stay around the 10% mark until election day.

    Agreed.
  • Survation is due out tonight I think, be interesting to see what that says
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    OK but all polls are hypothetical (if there were a GE tomorrow...)

    And what were the VI figures *without* the hypothetical at the time of the hypothetical poll, for comparison?
  • 'Hypothetical polls are a lot like Hawaiian pizzas, they should be avoided at all costs by right thinking people everywhere.'

    What a brilliant analogy, articles like this is why I read PB.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,484
    People are very poor predictors of their own behaviour. Sensible reminder.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    What Tory majority was forecast when the options for leader were polled wasn’t Johnson projected to get a 60 seat majority? Thought I’d save H the effort of reminding us!
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729

    Survation is due out tonight I think, be interesting to see what that says

    Clinging to the wreckage,.
  • Survation is due out tonight I think, be interesting to see what that says

    Clinging to the wreckage,.
    I'm not seeing much of a wreckage, I'm sticking to a HP for now
  • 'Hypothetical polls are a lot like Hawaiian pizzas, they should be avoided at all costs by right thinking people everywhere.'

    What a brilliant analogy, articles like this is why I read PB.

    The unfailing humility of its excellent thread-writers is a further reason for returning loyally to the Site.
  • speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    edited December 2019
    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.
  • speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    speedy2 said:

    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.

    Odd on Tory Majority with Betfair have drifted a tad to 1.51.
  • eristdooferistdoof Posts: 5,065
    IshmaelZ said:

    OK but all polls are hypothetical (if there were a GE tomorrow...)

    And what were the VI figures *without* the hypothetical at the time of the hypothetical poll, for comparison?

    off the top of my head, it was around Con 37, Lab 24, LD 20, BXP 10.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    GIN1138 said:

    I always thought the idea there would be a Con collapse after 31/10/19 if we didn't Brexit was wishful drinking from Remain....

    Oh and good afternoon PB :)

    HY won’t thank you for reminding us that he is a remainer.

  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729
    edited December 2019
    speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    The other joy inthe GE is if the sainted Nicola gets a kicking, seems unlikely but we can always hope.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222


    Needs a touch of chilli to balance out the sweetness of the pineapple. And lose the ham. Yum.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Is my poll addiction linked to my pineapple pizza addiction? :o
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936


    I am a pineapple pizza lover, and I approve of this message.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    Excellent article and also a reminder to some of the rampers above that both Panelbase and CR saw the Labour polling momentum stopped and in the case of the latter reversed. Reading much of the commentary here and indeed elsewhere the traffic is all one way and it really isn't at the moment.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695
    speedy2 said:

    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.

    Interesting views. Could the 1997 exception be the result of high confidence because everyone knew Blair's Labour were going to win?
  • speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    The other joy inthe GE is if the sainted Nicola gets a kicking, seems unlikely but we can always hope.
    You Tories love a violent metaphor when it comes to women pols you don't like.

  • I’m hungry now...
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    What`s Farage been up to - a bit quiet isn`t he? The old Brexit-blocker.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    GIN1138 said:

    I always thought the idea there would be a Con collapse after 31/10/19 if we didn't Brexit was wishful drinking from Remain....

    To be fair, presumably most of that particular poll was done before Johnson's deal was agreed.

    I do think extending without a deal would have been a different story.
  • speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    Labour 19 seats in Scotland? What?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    edited December 2019

    speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    Labour 19 seats in Scotland? What?
    Those are percentages, otherwise Scottish PB Tories would have been cockahoop
  • How long until todays polls?


  • speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981
    edited December 2019
    Stocky said:

    speedy2 said:

    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.

    Odd on Tory Majority with Betfair have drifted a tad to 1.51.
    Well Labour have closed the gap by 1% since last week but the extra evaporation of the Brexit Party is helping theoretically the Conservatives in Labour seats.
    But it is close, another point decline will push my swingometer to the 2-64 majority range, and you do have more and more pollsters predicting a Hung Parliament and the really bad consumer confidence figures.
    Also there is an error in the Electoral Calculus model that it doesn't account very well for the Brexit Party not standing in Conservative seats, it subtracts from them in Labour seats but does not add them in Conservative seats, it would overestimate conservative losses if the polls swing that far.
    I noticed it yesterday playing with it.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    edited December 2019
    GIN1138 said:

    I always thought the idea there would be a Con collapse after 31/10/19 if we didn't Brexit was wishful drinking from Remain....

    I think it might well have done were it not for the Benn Act. This gave "Boris" an alibi. It was a grievous error from 'my' side.
  • RobD said:

    speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    Labour 19 seats in Scotland? What?
    Those are percentages, otherwise Scottish PB Tories would have been cockahoop
    Ah, got it - sorry!
  • If Survation shows the gap tightening - me thinks that 1.51 majority is going to go out
  • speedy2speedy2 Posts: 981

    speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    Labour 19 seats in Scotland? What?
    Percentages.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    If Survation shows the gap tightening - me thinks that 1.51 majority is going to go out

    Clever. ;)
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729

    speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    The other joy inthe GE is if the sainted Nicola gets a kicking, seems unlikely but we can always hope.
    You Tories love a violent metaphor when it comes to women pols you don't like.
    What nonsense, I hope Corbyn gets as match of a kicking in the polls, to suggest its violence related is utterly preposterous. You guys up there are very touchy about the sainted Nicola.. a bad result in the GE and the wheels might fall off.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    kinabalu said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I always thought the idea there would be a Con collapse after 31/10/19 if we didn't Brexit was wishful drinking from Remain....

    I think it might well have done were it not for the Benn Act. This gave "Boris" an alibi. It was a grievous error from 'my' side.
    Why is Boris in quotes? Is he someone else disguised as Boris?
  • JameiJamei Posts: 59
    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.
  • RobD said:

    If Survation shows the gap tightening - me thinks that 1.51 majority is going to go out

    Clever. ;)
    I laid some more last night
  • speedy2 said:

    I got really bad news for the SNP.
    This week is the first week that I have the SNP bellow 40% in the average scottish subsamples.
    It's CON 25 LAB 19 LD 15 SNP 38 GRN 1 BRX 2 in scotland.

    The other joy inthe GE is if the sainted Nicola gets a kicking, seems unlikely but we can always hope.
    You Tories love a violent metaphor when it comes to women pols you don't like.
    We do need a new name for this, victimhood by proxy?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,038
    I had a Hawaiian pizza in Pisa. Super thin base. Delicious.

    On the menu is said 'Haway Pizza' - must have been a special for Geordies.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    speedy2 said:

    Stocky said:

    speedy2 said:

    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.

    Odd on Tory Majority with Betfair have drifted a tad to 1.51.
    Well Labour have closed the gap by 1% since last week but the extra evaporation of the Brexit Party is helping theoretically the Conservatives in Labour seats.
    But it is close, another point decline will push my swingometer to the 2-64 majority range, and you do have more and more pollsters predicting a Hung Parliament and the really bad consumer confidence figures.
    Also there is an error in the Electoral Calculus model that it doesn't account very well for the Brexit Party not standing in Conservative seats, it subtracts from them in Labour seats but does not add them in Conservative seats, it would overestimate conservative losses if the polls swing that far.
    I noticed it yesterday playing with it.
    So you are saying that Electoral Calculus underplays Tories` projected seats?
  • MangoMango Posts: 1,019
    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    So why then?
  • This consumer confidence thing is...interesting. I've never heard that before?
    Did anyone use it in 2017 at the time to predict a HP before everyone else?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    Voting Tory in Cambridge, you are, for sure.
  • Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    What would your answer have been?

    Sign of a weak canvass not getting as much useful info as possible...
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    Looking forward to seeing Trump this week anyway. I have a feeling he'll be on top top form. He has really blossomed in the last year or so. Bad news for his rivals.
    #ukchampionshipsnooker
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    Don't you want to keep the terrifying Marxist out?
  • kinabalu said:

    Looking forward to seeing Trump this week anyway. I have a feeling he'll be on top top form. He has really blossomed in the last year or so. Bad news for his rivals.
    #ukchampionshipsnooker

    Time was when most people in the country would have known his name. Back in ‘85 18.5 million watched Taylor beat Davies in a final that finished after midnight.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609

    I had a Hawaiian pizza in Pisa. Super thin base. Delicious.

    On the menu is said 'Haway Pizza' - must have been a special for Geordies.

    Hopefully not with a shite topping?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    felix said:

    Excellent article and also a reminder to some of the rampers above that both Panelbase and CR saw the Labour polling momentum stopped and in the case of the latter reversed. Reading much of the commentary here and indeed elsewhere the traffic is all one way and it really isn't at the moment.

    I'm afraid you can't read anything about momentum being stopped or reversed into individual polls (not ones of conventional size, anyway). Or anything positive about momentum. You have to look at averages.
  • https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1201161147333980171

    It's really now or never for Lib Dem voters (that extra 5%), to decide whether they prefer Corbyn or Brexit
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    speedy2 said:

    Stocky said:

    speedy2 said:

    From previous thread:
    Good and Bad news for the Conservatives.
    The bad news is that consumer confidence for November came in at -14, the worst in any election since 1983 apart from 2010 which was at -16. In 2017 it was -10, and Major in 1992 had it at -8.
    Consumer confidence being above -10 has correctly predicted government majorities in the past 8 out of 9 elections, 1997 was the only time it got it wrong.
    The good news is that their predicted majority with this week's opinion polls is stable, no change with my swingometer at a majority of 24-88 same as past week, and at 347 (up 2) with Electoral Calculus using the average regional subsamples of all pollsters.

    Odd on Tory Majority with Betfair have drifted a tad to 1.51.
    Well Labour have closed the gap by 1% since last week but the extra evaporation of the Brexit Party is helping theoretically the Conservatives in Labour seats.
    But it is close, another point decline will push my swingometer to the 2-64 majority range, and you do have more and more pollsters predicting a Hung Parliament and the really bad consumer confidence figures.
    Also there is an error in the Electoral Calculus model that it doesn't account very well for the Brexit Party not standing in Conservative seats, it subtracts from them in Labour seats but does not add them in Conservative seats, it would overestimate conservative losses if the polls swing that far.
    I noticed it yesterday playing with it.
    Who are the pollsters predicting a hung parliament?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609
    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1201161147333980171

    It's really now or never for Lib Dem voters (that extra 5%), to decide whether they prefer Corbyn or Brexit

    No. Most of the extra 5% are now in Tory facing seats where the decision on whether they wish to influence the election outcome sits with Labour voters.
  • IanB2 said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1201161147333980171

    It's really now or never for Lib Dem voters (that extra 5%), to decide whether they prefer Corbyn or Brexit

    No. Most of the extra 5% are now in Tory facing seats where the decision on whether they wish to influence the election outcome sits with Labour voters.
    Isn't it a bit of both? Surely in some Labour/Tory marginals the vote is split between Labour/LD?
  • JameiJamei Posts: 59

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    What would your answer have been?

    Sign of a weak canvass not getting as much useful info as possible...
    The whole Stop Brexit thing. I voted remain but it only took me a few hours to get over the shock and look forward to a decent EEA-type close relationship model which I assumed the LibDems would be pushing for. The attempt to overturn the result I find absolutely outrageous. I will now accept whatever type of Brexit seems most easily achievable. As to stopping Corbyn, it's clear a vote for the LibDems won't achieve that because they will prop him up in pursuit of their revoke policy.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    edited December 2019
    Stocky said:

    Why is Boris in quotes? Is he someone else disguised as Boris?

    That is exactly it. The inverteds signify the construct as opposed to the flesh & blood unit. An important distinction because it is the construct that is running in the election. We are being asked to vote not for Boris Johnson but for "Boris". It was "Boris" on Marr this morning. The star of the Tory PPB last week was "Boris". If the Cons win a big majority it will be a triumph for "Boris". Where is Boris Johnson in all of this? Nobody knows.
  • NovoNovo Posts: 60

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
  • PaulMPaulM Posts: 613

    I had a Hawaiian pizza in Pisa. Super thin base. Delicious.

    On the menu is said 'Haway Pizza' - must have been a special for Geordies.

    Howay would be the Geordie special. Haway is the Sunderland version.

    Laura Pidcock would know this. Islington Labour not so much.

  • NovoNovo Posts: 60
    Targeted mail shot from voting pool analysis!
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533
    edited December 2019

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Probably national leaflets which don't count in local spending if they don't mention the constituency. I had one this week from Sarah Wollaston, saying she'd decided to leave the Tories and I should too.

    Good targeting :)
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695
    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%
  • For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
  • Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Probably national leaflets wshich don't count in local spending if they don't mention the constituency. I had one this week from Sarah Wollaston, saying she'd decided to leave the Tories and I should too.

    Good targeting :)
    So much for stopping climate change. How many trees are being cut down to produce all these leaflets.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,729

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Most will have gone out b4 the deadline? If I was receiving 11 LD winning here leaflets, or that many from any party, I would be getting seriously pissed off...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    And also bearing in mind that the lead was dramatically over-estimated last time, which may have now been corrected for.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231

    Time was when most people in the country would have known his name. Back in ‘85 18.5 million watched Taylor beat Davies in a final that finished after midnight.

    Yes. Such a shame. The standard is immeasurably better now too.
  • Jamei said:

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    What would your answer have been?

    Sign of a weak canvass not getting as much useful info as possible...
    The whole Stop Brexit thing. I voted remain but it only took me a few hours to get over the shock and look forward to a decent EEA-type close relationship model which I assumed the LibDems would be pushing for. The attempt to overturn the result I find absolutely outrageous. I will now accept whatever type of Brexit seems most easily achievable. As to stopping Corbyn, it's clear a vote for the LibDems won't achieve that because they will prop him up in pursuit of their revoke policy.
    How May handled Brexit and how the other parties handled it is a masterclass in how not to compromise and turn a divided nation in on itself.
  • RobD said:

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    And also bearing in mind that the lead was dramatically over-estimated last time, which may have now been corrected for.
    Yes, it will be fascinating if they end up going the wrong way and it really does end up being a massive landslide
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited December 2019
    On topic both yes and know. As far as fortune telling goes these polls are as useful as a chocolate fireguard but read the right way they can glean very useful information. Events, dear boy, events will always change things before any hypothetical and so the key is like a successful chess player to think a few moves ahead.
    That hypothetical poll was not useless. For any hypothetical poll you need to think not just what the question says but what the respondent thinks and what they think they're answering. Many overly simplistic individuals read these polls and thought that this meant that Boris would be destroyed if only Remainers could stall Brexit until after Hallowe'en.
    What the polls really showed, which many of us here identified, was that the respondents were fed up of the messing around Parliament had done for months and wanted to "Get Brexit Done". Boris identified that and fed into that narrative.
    The hypothetical poll showed a surge for the BXP as people viewed the hypothetical as meaning that the Tories and others were still messing around. By saying he would rather "die in a ditch" and by obsessing over the date and refusing to extend Boris successfully tapped into that feeling himself. Voters aren't idiots, leavers aren't idiots. We could all see the Benn Act, we all knew who was responsible for delaying Brexit again and it wasn't Johnson it was Grieve and Labour and the Lib Dems etc.
    The hypothetical implied if you wanted to Get Brexit Done you needed to say BXP. Reality was something else. The poll was not useless - it just needed to be read and understood correctly.
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Most will have gone out b4 the deadline? If I was receiving 11 LD winning here leaflets, or that many from any party, I would be getting seriously pissed off...
    Why do you suppose their vote is going down?
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Does Mike`s make 12?
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    Well the current averages have a Tory majority of around 40. Something like 39/35 would probably grant your wish CHB - but we're a very long way from that at the moment.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164

    I had a Hawaiian pizza in Pisa. Super thin base. Delicious.

    On the menu is said 'Haway Pizza' - must have been a special for Geordies.

    The don't mackem like that in Sunderland!
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    We are well past "peak Corbyn" now though
  • Jason said:

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    Well the current averages have a Tory majority of around 40. Something like 39/35 would probably grant your wish CHB - but we're a very long way from that at the moment.
    Indeed.
  • Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Probably national leaflets which don't count in local spending if they don't mention the constituency. I had one this week from Sarah Wollaston, saying she'd decided to leave the Tories and I should too.

    Good targeting :)
    11 leaflets targeting the same constituency being classed as national leafleting is absurd and makes a mockery of it.

    My leaflet count: 2 Tory, 0 anybody else.
    On my street: 2 houses with Labour signs in people's gardens (1 has a giant Unite flag too), 2 with Tory ones. Amusingly the Unite/Labour one was first then a few days later the Tory one went up next door but one to the Unite/Labour one.
  • LD barrage continues in Richmond Park. Clearly they don't think it's a foregone conclusion.

    Plus Mike's letter which makes decent sense here in a LD-Con remainer marginal.
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683
    Stocky said:

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Does Mike`s make 12?
    My recollection of the last discussion I saw on this was that because Mike doesn't recommend a vote for the LibDems in the leaflet it doesn't count towards their spending, although I think it must nibble at the edges of the rules.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    Chris said:

    felix said:

    Excellent article and also a reminder to some of the rampers above that both Panelbase and CR saw the Labour polling momentum stopped and in the case of the latter reversed. Reading much of the commentary here and indeed elsewhere the traffic is all one way and it really isn't at the moment.

    I'm afraid you can't read anything about momentum being stopped or reversed into individual polls (not ones of conventional size, anyway). Or anything positive about momentum. You have to look at averages.
    Of course - that was my point really - and missing out the ones that you don't like doesn't work either.
  • kinabalu said:

    Time was when most people in the country would have known his name. Back in ‘85 18.5 million watched Taylor beat Davies in a final that finished after midnight.

    Yes. Such a shame. The standard is immeasurably better now too.
    If I remember correctly snooker was picked up by The BBC as a way of showing off the new colour TVs.
  • Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    Official LD canvassing has no interest in why people vote the way they do. They are solely looking for the afflicted so they can be dragged out on election day. Fascinated me after the Referendum but before GE 2017. They had sent around 3 or 4 surveys and if they had been getting the same results as we were then it was obvious that support for Timmy was tanking and they hated his Brexit position. I can only conclude that they were only recording VI and taking no interest in the reasons given.

    Timmy is now promoting himself as an "Independent Liberal". Here in W&L Postal Voters have had the equivalent of the Mike Smithson letter from Sarah Wallaston - really !
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683

    kinabalu said:

    Time was when most people in the country would have known his name. Back in ‘85 18.5 million watched Taylor beat Davies in a final that finished after midnight.

    Yes. Such a shame. The standard is immeasurably better now too.
    If I remember correctly snooker was picked up by The BBC as a way of showing off the new colour TVs.
    Which led to the (alleged) famous commentary; 'And for those of you watching in black and white the green ball is the one behind the red'.
  • Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Probably national leaflets which don't count in local spending if they don't mention the constituency. I had one this week from Sarah Wollaston, saying she'd decided to leave the Tories and I should too.

    Good targeting :)
    11 leaflets targeting the same constituency being classed as national leafleting is absurd and makes a mockery of it.

    My leaflet count: 2 Tory, 0 anybody else.
    On my street: 2 houses with Labour signs in people's gardens (1 has a giant Unite flag too), 2 with Tory ones. Amusingly the Unite/Labour one was first then a few days later the Tory one went up next door but one to the Unite/Labour one.
    I’ve had one Tory (the sitting MP) and one Green. Nothing from anybody else. Don’t think I’ve seen any posters: it can be difficult to tell though as a local estate agent uses the same colours as Labour.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    edited December 2019
    I`m bored.
    Any bets I should be placing?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    Official LD canvassing has no interest in why people vote the way they do. They are solely looking for the afflicted so they can be dragged out on election day. Fascinated me after the Referendum but before GE 2017. They had sent around 3 or 4 surveys and if they had been getting the same results as we were then it was obvious that support for Timmy was tanking and they hated his Brexit position. I can only conclude that they were only recording VI and taking no interest in the reasons given.

    Timmy is now promoting himself as an "Independent Liberal".
    I.L.Liberal for short?
  • TudorRose said:

    kinabalu said:

    Time was when most people in the country would have known his name. Back in ‘85 18.5 million watched Taylor beat Davies in a final that finished after midnight.

    Yes. Such a shame. The standard is immeasurably better now too.
    If I remember correctly snooker was picked up by The BBC as a way of showing off the new colour TVs.
    Which led to the (alleged) famous commentary; 'And for those of you watching in black and white the green ball is the one behind the red'.
    😀
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453

    If Survation shows the gap tightening - me thinks that 1.51 majority is going to go out

    I think Survation will show a 9% tory lead.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,590

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    Are you on performance related pay?
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    Official LD canvassing has no interest in why people vote the way they do. They are solely looking for the afflicted so they can be dragged out on election day. Fascinated me after the Referendum but before GE 2017. They had sent around 3 or 4 surveys and if they had been getting the same results as we were then it was obvious that support for Timmy was tanking and they hated his Brexit position. I can only conclude that they were only recording VI and taking no interest in the reasons given.

    Timmy is now promoting himself as an "Independent Liberal". Here in W&L Postal Voters have had the equivalent of the Mike Smithson letter from Sarah Wallaston - really !
    Is it my imagination or are there even more posters in W&L than normal? I'm in the Morecambe constituency and we have nothing much here but it always seems like poster city once you get to Milnthorpe and beyond.
  • Stocky said:

    I`m bored.
    Any bets I should be placing?

    Lay Swinson for PM?
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    edited December 2019

    Jason said:

    For those worried about / hopeful for a repeat of GE 2017:
    Average Tory lead (last 6 polls) 11 days ahead of GE19 = 9.2%
    Average Tory lead 11 days ahead of GE17 = 8.8%

    Bearing in mind the lead needed this time to cause a HP is apparently a lot higher, that's good for me
    Well the current averages have a Tory majority of around 40. Something like 39/35 would probably grant your wish CHB - but we're a very long way from that at the moment.
    Indeed.
    Labour need Tory voters to do a straight switch, and/or a LD collapse - but this close to an election where *probably* most people have made up their minds, I just can't see how Labour get the numbers. Even in the event of a HP, Corbyn won't get the support he thinks he's going to get - unless he signs up to indyref2 and scrapping trident - which Labour MPs will vote down. Then back to square one.

    It's a complete mess, and we're all guessing and nothing more than that. So I'll stick with my original prediction and say a working Tory majority - just.
  • Novo said:

    Jamei said:

    My leaflet count in Cambridge so far: LibDem 22 (11 of which sent by post), Labour 6 (2 of which sent by post).
    Had a LibDem canvasser today, I told him I'd voted LibDem in 2010 and 2015 but wouldn't be doing so this time. As I refused to say who I would vote for he no doubt correctly assumed I will be voting Tory. He didn't ask why they had lost my vote though, which was a shame, but presumably I'm a lost cause now.

    How the hell are the LibDems affording 11 postal leaflets??? Those expenses are going to need crawling over with a fine tooth comb......
    Must be a large family. They rely upon the fact that it is virtually impossible to prove how many articles have gone through the post.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231

    If I remember correctly snooker was picked up by The BBC as a way of showing off the new colour TVs.

    Yes. Cue legendary Ted Lowe commentary. "For those of you watching in ..."
This discussion has been closed.