Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why I’m now a seller of LAB seats on the Spreads.

SystemSystem Posts: 12,170
edited November 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why I’m now a seller of LAB seats on the Spreads.

We haven’t yet looked at the series pf English regional polls that YouGov carried out last month and and only just published them.  This is the first time I can recall this form of polling being carried out across England and the results help us to see where parties are doing well.

Read the full story here


«1345678

Comments

  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    First!
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,232
    OK.

    I have a theory, which is based on a limited dataset, so may well be completely wrong:

    Betting markets are overly influenced by the last election, and in particular the errors in polling in the last elections. This issue is exacerbated by polling companies changing their methodologies between elections and possibly overcorrecting.

    So. 2010 - Labour did much better, and the Conservatives much worse than expected.

    In 2015, the expectation, then, was that the Conservatives would fail to meet their expectations and we'd get another hung parliament. In fact, the Conservatives outperformed, and Labour underperformed.

    2017, this reversed, with the Conservatives doing less well, and the Labour Party doing much better.

    Based on three datapoints during which fortunes switched, I will forecast the same will happen again, and Labour will do worse than expected, and the Conservatives better.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721
    Looks bad for Labour across its former heartlands. It depends how much the LDs can do in former Tory heartlands.

    Pidcock losing her seat may knock her out of the leadership race. Looks like Con gain on these figures.
  • Hmm.

    Maybe. The polling does look bad, but neither of the last two elections ended the way they started. I still suspect the incumbent will screw up a number of debates and the prime beneficiary may well be Corbyn.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Foxy said:

    Looks bad for Labour across its former heartlands. It depends how much the LDs can do in former Tory heartlands.

    Pidcock losing her seat may knock her out of the leadership race. Looks like Con gain on these figures.

    She could accept a peerage and be leader from the Lords.

    :)
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,232

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    I have put my hat in the ring re LibDem seats, with a forecast of 21. I'm now thinking I might have been a little stingy, and a mid 20s number may be possible for them. I'm thinking they'll manage something somewhere between Ashdown '92 and his in performance '97. (I think their vote share might also come out right in the middle of Ashdown '92 and '97 as well...)

    Interestingly, if you look at LibDem/Liberal General Election performances in the last 70-odd years, you see quite a lot of seat totals in the 5 to 22 level, and a few between 45 and 60-odd, and nothing in between. Which means that my new forecast is right in no man's land.
  • In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    It would actually be slightly worse than 1983. It would be Labour's worst result since 1935, without the excuses of having been reduced to just 50 seats in the previous election and having changed leader following a brutal party conference a few weeks before.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153
    edited November 2019
    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    I'm incapable of believing they could do so badly. As Black_Rook notes its 1983 like, with the Tories not doing as well. The regional polling makes it seem credible, if you think it itself is credible.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    edited November 2019
    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
  • Foxy said:

    Looks bad for Labour across its former heartlands. It depends how much the LDs can do in former Tory heartlands.

    Pidcock losing her seat may knock her out of the leadership race. Looks like Con gain on these figures.

    Anybody for "Were you up for Pidcock?"
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424

    Foxy said:

    Looks bad for Labour across its former heartlands. It depends how much the LDs can do in former Tory heartlands.

    Pidcock losing her seat may knock her out of the leadership race. Looks like Con gain on these figures.

    Anybody for "Were you up for Pidcock?"
    No!
  • Gabs2Gabs2 Posts: 1,268
    Labour seem to be further down in every region than they are in the national polling. Usually I would think it is London making up for the difference, but they seem to be down there too. Where is the mismatch between regional and national polls coming from?
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    kle4 said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    I'm incapable of believing they could do so badly. As Black_Rook notes its 1983 like, with the Tories not doing as well. The regional polling makes it seem credible, if you think it itself is credible.
    Some models are showing even fewer seats for Labour. 168 with this Yougov poll.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/gbrpolls/status/1193198127588745217
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    edited November 2019
    kle4 said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    I'm incapable of believing they could do so badly. As Black_Rook notes its 1983 like, with the Tories not doing as well. The regional polling makes it seem credible, if you think it itself is credible.
    In 1983 Labour won 41 seats in Scotland. They could credibly hold just one this time, which would mean a 1983 like result in England and Wales would leave them with 169 seats overall. ~200 across the UK would be some distance better [for Labour] in England and Wales than 1983.
  • ydoethur said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    It would actually be slightly worse than 1983. It would be Labour's worst result since 1935, without the excuses of having been reduced to just 50 seats in the previous election and having changed leader following a brutal party conference a few weeks before.
    Bear in mind that in 1983 there were a raft of Scottish Labour seats and only two in the south outside London. Even on 210, Labour would have a presence in Middle England
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    Foxy said:

    Looks bad for Labour across its former heartlands. It depends how much the LDs can do in former Tory heartlands.

    Pidcock losing her seat may knock her out of the leadership race. Looks like Con gain on these figures.

    My back of her at big odds will not be so smug city if that were to happen.
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    The worst take is saying "it didn't happen last time so it wont happen this time".
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,232
    Assuming Labour does badly in Scotland, then the regional swing in this poll would see them down to 120-140 seats, which would be extraordinary. Simply, the Conservative Party is holding up well where it is competing for Labour leave seats, and is down where the Labour Party is not in contention.

    OGH's bet is an excellent one, because the assumption is that the Labour Party will do better than the polls. (As an aside, if these polls are correct, the LDs are also going to outperform my expectations.)
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424
    edited November 2019

    ydoethur said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    It would actually be slightly worse than 1983. It would be Labour's worst result since 1935, without the excuses of having been reduced to just 50 seats in the previous election and having changed leader following a brutal party conference a few weeks before.
    Bear in mind that in 1983 there were a raft of Scottish Labour seats and only two in the south outside London. Even on 210, Labour would have a presence in Middle England
    Yes, all that is true. Would still be a shockingly bad result.

    Edit- btw, I think it was three survivors outside London - Bristol South, Thurrock and Ipswich (which somehow Labour lost in 1987 instead).
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,231
    @Black_Rook

    Can you stop saying "robots" please.

    It's becoming a little robotic.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,775
    edited November 2019
    Given BF moves there must be a bad poll for Labour soon to emerge. That or Burgon and Abbot are on the TV tomorrow.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    I think it will be worse for Lab than 1983. They are now losing the English coalfields and Wales to add their lost Scottish seats.

    I cannot see a single Lab gain to compensate, and neither can I see enough LD gains.
  • FPT:
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    AndyJS said:

    Just checked Betfair and a Tory majority has just moved back into "more likely than not" territory.

    https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.136297311

    The Tories are not going to lose this election. How can they? There is no opposition to beat. Boris will get a majority and Labour and the LibDems will look like fools for thinking they could win this.
    I'm pretty sure the exact same thing was said in 2017. :p
    I am also pretty sure Labour did not win the 2017 election. We have a Tory govt.
    They certainly didn't get a majority!

    Maybe not, but Corbyn is still LotO
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,232
    nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    If that happened, and I think it's an unlikely but amusing possibility, who do you think would be the next Conservative leader? Priti Patel?
  • Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721
    kinabalu said:

    @Black_Rook

    Can you stop saying "robots" please.

    It's becoming a little robotic.

    Robot is Czech for forced worker as I recall, from the seminal play "Rossums Universal Robots"
  • rcs1000 said:

    nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    If that happened, and I think it's an unlikely but amusing possibility, who do you think would be the next Conservative leader? Priti Patel?
    Gove might be more likely, or Raab. Patel could replace Javid if that happens though.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    kle4 said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    I'm incapable of believing they could do so badly. As Black_Rook notes its 1983 like, with the Tories not doing as well. The regional polling makes it seem credible, if you think it itself is credible.
    In 1983 Labour won 41 seats in Scotland. They could credibly hold just one this time, which would mean a 1983 like result in England and Wales would leave them with 169 seats overall. ~200 across the UK would be some distance better [for Labour] in England and Wales than 1983.
    It's a fair cop. On the other hand...

    ydoethur said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    It would actually be slightly worse than 1983. It would be Labour's worst result since 1935, without the excuses of having been reduced to just 50 seats in the previous election and having changed leader following a brutal party conference a few weeks before.
    Bear in mind that in 1983 there were a raft of Scottish Labour seats and only two in the south outside London. Even on 210, Labour would have a presence in Middle England
    No it wouldn't. Labour has little presence left as things currently stand in Southern England outside of London, or anywhere in rural England except in the far North. A drubbing on that scale would leave Labour confined to the major conurbations and the South Wales valleys, and almost nowhere else.
  • ***ots is clearly racist.

    The correct term is 'synthetic life form'.

    ....

    :p
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    kinabalu said:

    @Black_Rook

    Can you stop saying "robots" please.

    It's becoming a little robotic.

    Sorry, it simply takes less time to type than tribal loyalty voters. This is helpful when one is away from home and coping without a proper keyboard.
  • Gabs2Gabs2 Posts: 1,268

    rcs1000 said:

    nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    If that happened, and I think it's an unlikely but amusing possibility, who do you think would be the next Conservative leader? Priti Patel?
    Gove might be more likely, or Raab. Patel could replace Javid if that happens though.
    Raab seems better placed than Gove. Is Patel smart enough to be Chancellor?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    The media hysteria over the YouGov regional polling completely ignores the same type of polling which was done in May 2017 .

    I’d advise people to look at how awful Labour were doing then , indeed the Tories are doing worse now compared to the same time period before the June 2017 GE.

  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,775

    Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?

    I do love Labour maths.

    This was a recent highlight

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1174966536777293824

  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Foxy said:

    Artist said:

    Not sure, losing over 50 seats seems like a lot. It would be an absymal result for Labour if they did end up in the 210 region.

    It would be a 1983 level disaster, but this time the Tories are not doing as well to begin with and they have competition to the Right. Much as I would like Labour to receive a proper pasting, it's not going to happen (except in Scotland.)
    I think it will be worse for Lab than 1983. They are now losing the English coalfields and Wales to add their lost Scottish seats.

    I cannot see a single Lab gain to compensate, and neither can I see enough LD gains.
    North Wales I can see going, the South and the old Northern English coalfields not so much. Too many hefty majorities, too much ingrained hatred of the Tories. But I stand to be corrected by events...
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    Amazing how you slag off Labour voters and yet the same apparent Tory robots are given a free pass !
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721

    ***ots is clearly racist.

    The correct term is 'synthetic life form'.

    ....

    :p

    I, for one, welcome our robot overlords, they are better than our current shower, better music too.

    https://youtu.be/u_DZmgArjqU

    Off to the match now, a tasty but soggy affair. I hate the gunners...
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    ***ots is clearly racist.

    The correct term is 'synthetic life form'.

    ....

    :p

    Ripley:
    You never said anything about an android being on board, why not?

    Burke:
    It never uhm, never occurred to me. It's common practice, we always have a synthetic on board.

    Bishop:
    I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself.
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    edited November 2019

    Hmm.

    Maybe. The polling does look bad, but neither of the last two elections ended the way they started. I still suspect the incumbent will screw up a number of debates and the prime beneficiary may well be Corbyn.

    Labour were gifted some monumental bonuses at the last election, namely Theresa May and the Dementia Tax. Corbyn also defied expectations, starting from a base of practically zero. It was a perfect storm for Labour. Now, the constant drip drip of the anti Semitism stuff has started to stick. And a lot of Labour voters - and plenty of others too - gave cuddly old grandpa Corbyn the benfit of the doubt then. Those very same people will now see him for what he is - a nasty old bastard.

    But most importantly Brexit was not even on the horizon then. Corbyn's pathological refusal to state which side he supports will sink Labour in both Leave and Remain seats.

    All Boris has to do is stay disciplined in the debates - tricky for him at times granted - and then let Corbyn dig Labour's Brexit sized grave all by himself.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,232
    Gabs2 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    If that happened, and I think it's an unlikely but amusing possibility, who do you think would be the next Conservative leader? Priti Patel?
    Gove might be more likely, or Raab. Patel could replace Javid if that happens though.
    Raab seems better placed than Gove. Is Patel smart enough to be Chancellor?
    Patel isn't smart enough to be Home Secretary, yet here we are.
  • Omnium said:

    Given BF moves there must be a bad poll for Labour soon to emerge. That or Burgon and Abbot are on the TV tomorrow.

    There probably is, but there's also inertia. The closer we get to polling day without things changing, the better price you would expect to obtain if you wish to bet that things are going to change.
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    rcs1000 said:

    nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    If that happened, and I think it's an unlikely but amusing possibility, who do you think would be the next Conservative leader? Priti Patel?
    I seem to recall reading that a result of this kind would mean that the surviving members of the Cabinet would have to meet and elect a stand in to send to the Queen as their nominee for Prime Minister. It seems highly likely that this individual would then be elected unopposed as Tory leader.

    Anyway, should that happen I reckon that they'd pick Gove. Which would be somewhat ironic.
  • nunu2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    In this poll it looks like the changes are larger where the Tories are going to pick up seats and smaller where they are defending them - optimally distributed for a massive Conservative victory.

    Needs a big change to stop Johnson.

    Is there any chance it could be much bigger in the marginals and a huge swing to Labour in Uxbridge?
    A comfortable Tory majority and Boris loses his seat.

    I honestly could live with that.
    He would remain PM in that scenario and some poor sod would be made to vacate a safe Tory seat.

    Imagine the subsequent by election though. It would be an absolute circus, and if he lost again he would have no option but to resign. (See Patrick Gordon-Walker).
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,775

    Omnium said:

    Given BF moves there must be a bad poll for Labour soon to emerge. That or Burgon and Abbot are on the TV tomorrow.

    There probably is, but there's also inertia. The closer we get to polling day without things changing, the better price you would expect to obtain if you wish to bet that things are going to change.
    Entirely true, and a good point. I think its probably a little early to see quite such an impact from that just yet though.

  • blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
    Because the election is (almost) a forced choice and the other lot are at least as bad if not worse.
  • nico67 said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    Amazing how you slag off Labour voters and yet the same apparent Tory robots are given a free pass !
    Speaking of Tory robots..

    https://twitter.com/ScotTories/status/1193191248733069312?s=20

    They're still working on the AI aspect.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
    Because most voters do so unthinkingly and from habit. There's a very good reason why the Tories have polled over 30% in every General Election since 1835.

    In order for Labour to be replaced in England there would need to be some sort of epochal upheaval here to match that which saw Labour overthrown by the SNP in Scotland. Sadly there is no sign of any such thing in prospect.
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
    Because the election is (almost) a forced choice and the other lot are at least as bad if not worse.
    No, Labour is far worse - possibly the most appalling incarnation in its history. At least Foot had a formidable intellect and oratorical powers to go with his far left loopiness!
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609
    Was canvassing some areas of social housing in the Totnes constituency today. The rural poor.

    I was genuinally astonsished at how well the Cons are doing there. Had two neighbouring houses who each said that Dr. Sarah Wollaston was "a waste of space". Sorry, PClipp.

    Corbyn is voter-repellent. Unprompted diatribes again.

    On the flip side, I did have my first incandescent Leftie at my being on his doorstep. Tories are "all fucking arseholes", apparently.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,127
    edited November 2019
    Ishmael_Z said:

    ***ots is clearly racist.

    The correct term is 'synthetic life form'.

    ....

    :p

    Ripley:
    You never said anything about an android being on board, why not?

    Burke:
    It never uhm, never occurred to me. It's common practice, we always have a synthetic on board.

    Bishop:
    I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself.
    GODSDAMN IT YOU GOT THERE BEFORE ME!

    Still, not bad...

    ...for a human :)
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652
    Matthew Goodwin noted that the Labour vote intention among the young is up about 20% since the time of this regional polling. For what it's worth.
  • Funny isn't it that a couple of days ago, OGH felt the need to headline us with the "news" that the Tories were "down a touch" on the spreads, actually by <1% from a mid-spread quote of 326 to 323 seats? Yet he chooses to ignore the fact that since then, Spreadex's mid-quote is up by six seats to a record high for this campaign of 329 seats. Surely the real news is that the Tories mid-spread price has increased by no less than 25 seats over just the last six weeks?
  • Foxy said:

    ***ots is clearly racist.

    The correct term is 'synthetic life form'.

    ....

    :p

    I, for one, welcome our robot overlords, they are better than our current shower, better music too.

    youtu.be/u_DZmgArjqU

    Off to the match now, a tasty but soggy affair. I hate the gunners...
    Amateurs! The keyboard player from "Sparks" - now, there was a robot :D
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Technical question:

    @NickPalmer said a few threads ago that YouGov had just added the last few polls together to make regional numbers. I.e. basically aggregate sub samples

    I’m cynical about his fidelity when political convenience takes precedence

    So is he right or are these properly weighted & balanced regional polls?
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    edited November 2019
    I don't think Labour are remotely ready for what's coming in 4 weeks 5 days time
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
    Because the election is (almost) a forced choice and the other lot are at least as bad if not worse.
    No, Labour is far worse - possibly the most appalling incarnation in its history. At least Foot had a formidable intellect and oratorical powers to go with his far left loopiness!
    Michael Foot was a moderate compared to Corbyn, as barking mad as he was. All of the moderate Labour MPs knew what Corbyn and McDonnell were/are, so the question is, why didn't they have the courage to split completely off the Labour party and form their own party? They would have greatly outnumbered the remaining Corbynistas in Parliament and could have become an electoral force in their won right. I just can't believe so many of them are fighting to put Corbyn into number 10.
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683
    EPG said:

    Matthew Goodwin noted that the Labour vote intention among the young is up about 20% since the time of this regional polling. For what it's worth.

    Has anyone told him that the plan to let 16 year-olds have the vote didn't work?
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    RobD said:

    I don't think Labour are remotely ready for what's coming in 4 weeks 5 days time

    Government? :)
    I think not ;)
    They are more likely to be sub 150 than over 200
  • Was canvassing some areas of social housing in the Totnes constituency today. The rural poor.

    I was genuinally astonsished at how well the Cons are doing there. Had two neighbouring houses who each said that Dr. Sarah Wollaston was "a waste of space". Sorry, PClipp.

    Corbyn is voter-repellent. Unprompted diatribes again.

    On the flip side, I did have my first incandescent Leftie at my being on his doorstep. Tories are "all fucking arseholes", apparently.

    Party trumps personality. The last Conservative MP was a waste of space but this time it will be different.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424
    Well, there was a reform package.

    For starters, they re-formed Germany.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,721
    He prefers primary schools. No difficult questions, and hospital patients with no visitors. It's the 8-80 age group that he avoids.

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,652
    TudorRose said:

    EPG said:

    Matthew Goodwin noted that the Labour vote intention among the young is up about 20% since the time of this regional polling. For what it's worth.

    Has anyone told him that the plan to let 16 year-olds have the vote didn't work?
    I'm not sure that this response adds anything to our knowledge let alone our expectancy.

    Idk, but I get the sense that the population of bettors sometimes puts heart over head when it comes to tail outcomes for Labour. I remember two years ago getting odds of, like, 1/4 on Burgon in Leeds East, when it was already clear that Corbyn had rallied the base, if not quite up to the Gordon Brown levels of support that he eventually achieved.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424
    Omnium said:

    Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?

    I do love Labour maths.

    This was a recent highlight

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1174966536777293824

    https://youtu.be/iS-0Az7dgRY
  • Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    nico67 said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    Amazing how you slag off Labour voters and yet the same apparent Tory robots are given a free pass !
    Speaking of Tory robots..

    https://twitter.com/ScotTories/status/1193191248733069312?s=20

    They're still working on the AI aspect.
    Still working on the I let alone the A...
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875
    When are we expecting the manifestos to land?
  • blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    It's already started. Watch the new raft of polls for tomorrow's papers. The Labour average will be up again.
    Damn you! But it's what I expect as well.

    Why why why can't Labour get the electoral kicking they so richly deserve, just this once? It's been a long time since 1983...
    Because the election is (almost) a forced choice and the other lot are at least as bad if not worse.
    No, Labour is far worse - possibly the most appalling incarnation in its history. At least Foot had a formidable intellect and oratorical powers to go with his far left loopiness!
    Most of the extreme and even anti-democratic actions that used to be predicted by Corbyn's opponents on left and right have now been carried out by this Conservative government. Purging internal opponents, suspending parliament, spaffing untold billions of pounds. Write your own list. Boris is the Conservatives' Corbyn.

    And on Friday 13th, one of them will be filmed walking into 10 Downing Street.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153
    kinabalu said:

    @Black_Rook

    Can you stop saying "robots" please.

    It's becoming a little robotic.

    Automatons? Homunculi?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424

    Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    Campaigning in a seat famous for its (defunct) nappy factory is appropriate for a man who’s full of shit.
  • Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    To be fair Johnson was in Bury St Edmunds the other day. If that goes red, England will have fallen...
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153

    I don't think Labour are remotely ready for what's coming in 4 weeks 5 days time

    Probably not, the supply and confidence discussions with the LDs and others will be tricky.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,291

    Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    Because they are trying to stop a meltdown in their heartlands?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609

    Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    Oh, she thought he'd said a 99 seat strategy......
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    kle4 said:

    I don't think Labour are remotely ready for what's coming in 4 weeks 5 days time

    Probably not, the supply and confidence discussions with the LDs and others will be tricky.
    If it comes down to that then the bit we should all really be looking forward to is when we find ourselves lumbered with a UK Government propped up by SNP votes negotiating Scottish independence with the SNP.

    It'll make the Brexit shitstorm look like a minor squall.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    edited November 2019
    We don't hear much about Baxter's projections on Pb.com these days ...I wonder why that is?
    FWIW, he currently has the Tories winning 373 seats, Labour on 182 and LibDems on 25, giving the Blue Team an overall majority of 96, or actually into three figures if Sinn Fein MPs again fail to take up their seats in the HoC.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,291

    Was canvassing some areas of social housing in the Totnes constituency today. The rural poor.

    I was genuinally astonsished at how well the Cons are doing there. Had two neighbouring houses who each said that Dr. Sarah Wollaston was "a waste of space". Sorry, PClipp.

    Corbyn is voter-repellent. Unprompted diatribes again.

    On the flip side, I did have my first incandescent Leftie at my being on his doorstep. Tories are "all fucking arseholes", apparently.

    Dr. Woolaston on her way out?
  • Evening all and looking at the YouGov regional results made me think of the changes in Scotland between 2010 and 2015. We saw both the SNP and Tories chipping away at Labour in council by-elections and then of course at that time Labour had a fair number of their 41 Scottish seats with 10,000+ majorities. The only ones they took back in 2017 were seats where they had had Islington sized majorities. Many of those with sub 10,000 majorities in 2010 in 2017 became battles between the SNP and SCons.

    Assuming that in places like Liverpool, Manchester and Inner London the 20,000+ majority electorates are more or less remaining loyal to the Corbyn plan, could that mean that in places like Birmingham and the Midlands, the South and possibly even in Wales they are going to go from 1st to 3rd or even 4th in one election?

    We have often talked about whether English Labour could face a Scottish Labour 2015 type meltdown. Could this be that election or will we see polls this evening showing Labour put clear red water between them and the Liberals in these polls and possibly narrowing the Tory lead? I was struck by the very normal folk SKY interviewed in Thurrock yesterday and only one said she was sticking with Labour. Indeed one wee lady started on the "my father always voted Labour, my mother always voted Labour and I've always voted Labour... but for the 1st time in my life and I would never have believed it possible, I am voting for Boris because I think he will get it done and we must get it [Brexit] done."
  • Gabs2Gabs2 Posts: 1,268
    GIN1138 said:

    Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    Because they are trying to stop a meltdown in their heartlands?
    Because having rallies with lots of enthusiastic supporters make for great social media clips.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,080
    Omnium said:

    Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?

    I do love Labour maths.

    This was a recent highlight

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1174966536777293824

    Why is it so hard to count 53 votes correctly?

    Good evening, everyone.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153
    nico67 said:

    blueblue said:

    Foxy said:

    These YouGov data are broadly encouraging for the Conservatives, but they're already out of date and I'd be very surprised were Labour's support to remain this depressed. I'm as sure as I can be that this GE is still going to be close.

    The Lib Dems are doing much better than last time, but there's already some polling evidence of squeeze and they start from a very long way behind in most constituencies. Their tally from this election should be much closer to Paddy Ashdown in 1992 than Charles Kennedy in 2005.

    Those LD barcharts are going to get an outing across SE, SW, and East England, and rightly so. The squeeze will be on Lab there.
    Except that Labour's support has a much higher floor than does that of the Lib Dems. There's an irreducible core of committed Socialists and Labour robots who won't vote for anybody else, regardless of Europe or any other issues - and who certainly haven't forgiven or forgotten the Coalition, either.

    Labour defections won't be enough to get the yellows over the line in any more than a handful of Tory-held seats.
    In my pessimistic moments, I'm afraid you might be right - the moment Corbyn announces his tidal wave of free stuff, his, er, android followers will have their memories wiped, forget all about his epic shitness and surge back to Labour.

    It's happened before...
    Amazing how you slag off Labour voters and yet the same apparent Tory robots are given a free pass !
    Its up to each others' side to point out the robots on the other.
  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    kle4 said:

    I don't think Labour are remotely ready for what's coming in 4 weeks 5 days time

    Probably not, the supply and confidence discussions with the LDs and others will be tricky.
    If it comes down to that then the bit we should all really be looking forward to is when we find ourselves lumbered with a UK Government propped up by SNP votes negotiating Scottish independence with the SNP.

    It'll make the Brexit shitstorm look like a minor squall.
    Damn ... IF we had to lose, then that's the scenario I would want Labour to have to govern in!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153
    nico67 said:

    The media hysteria over the YouGov regional polling completely ignores the same type of polling which was done in May 2017 .

    I’d advise people to look at how awful Labour were doing then , indeed the Tories are doing worse now compared to the same time period before the June 2017 GE.

    Quite. Is there a link to what the regional polling showed then, as I swear it was basically the same.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,424
    AnneJGP said:

    Omnium said:

    Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?

    I do love Labour maths.

    This was a recent highlight

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1174966536777293824

    Why is it so hard to count 53 votes correctly?

    Good evening, everyone.
    Becuase it requires six members to get the right number of fingers?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,153

    Karie Murphy's 99% target seats strategy in action:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1193213289511243777

    Because images of adoring masses in heartlands worked last time in motivating everyone?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609

    Was canvassing some areas of social housing in the Totnes constituency today. The rural poor.

    I was genuinally astonsished at how well the Cons are doing there. Had two neighbouring houses who each said that Dr. Sarah Wollaston was "a waste of space". Sorry, PClipp.

    Corbyn is voter-repellent. Unprompted diatribes again.

    On the flip side, I did have my first incandescent Leftie at my being on his doorstep. Tories are "all fucking arseholes", apparently.

    Party trumps personality. The last Conservative MP was a waste of space but this time it will be different.
    It will. He's a strong candidate.

    Ironically, he is probably the greenest candidate, what with the Greens not standing in Totnes.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,080
    Jason said:

    Hmm.

    Maybe. The polling does look bad, but neither of the last two elections ended the way they started. I still suspect the incumbent will screw up a number of debates and the prime beneficiary may well be Corbyn.

    Labour were gifted some monumental bonuses at the last election, namely Theresa May and the Dementia Tax. Corbyn also defied expectations, starting from a base of practically zero. It was a perfect storm for Labour. Now, the constant drip drip of the anti Semitism stuff has started to stick. And a lot of Labour voters - and plenty of others too - gave cuddly old grandpa Corbyn the benfit of the doubt then. Those very same people will now see him for what he is - a nasty old bastard.

    But most importantly Brexit was not even on the horizon then. Corbyn's pathological refusal to state which side he supports will sink Labour in both Leave and Remain seats.

    All Boris has to do is stay disciplined in the debates - tricky for him at times granted - and then let Corbyn dig Labour's Brexit sized grave all by himself.
    All too often, when someone says "All you have to do is ....", they're describing the thing the person they're talking to finds impossible to do.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    AnneJGP said:

    Omnium said:

    Mr. Omnium, the new promise for 100,000 police at a cost of a mere £37 will surely turn the tide in Labour's favour?

    I do love Labour maths.

    This was a recent highlight

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1174966536777293824

    Why is it so hard to count 53 votes correctly?

    Good evening, everyone.
    Much as its fun to bash, there may indeed be nothing wrong with the maths, if there is the possibility to not participate in the vote. In the UN voting system, those absent from the room at the time of the vote are not counted as abstentions.
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614


    Its up to each others' side to point out the robots on the other.

    Howdy, kle4, I haven't spoken to you since the last election, right? Please tell me you've started watching 'The Expanse'?

This discussion has been closed.