Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » With 23 days to go punters make it a 21% chance that the UK wi

1235

Comments

  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    We still should
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    Uncontrollable immigration was a significant concern for a lot of people. The government judges that their interests should be taken into account.
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/simoncoveney/status/1181529555397480452?s=19

    Irish there calling for regime change to get their way

    Or a change of heart from the current regime. But carry on, please do try to distil as much outrage as you can from this, it's doing us all so much good.
    I'm glad it's doing you some good. Any outrage is not enough for the perfidious treachery of the EU. Olive oil, shamrock and fat sausage weirdos.
  • Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I've been out for the morning. Have you finished killing Merkel with your mouth?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237
    GIN1138 said:

    Would there be a recording/minutes of the conversation between Merkel and Boris?

    Presumably there is someone in Downing St. taking notes of what is being said?

    If so maybe Downing St. will release the full transcript later.

    If only.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,236
    edited October 2019
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    Uncontrollable immigration was a significant concern for a lot of people. The government judges that their interests should be taken into account.
    No, it judged that consideration ought to overrule all others.

    (And, of course, ‘uncontrollable’ was a gross exaggeration.)
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786

    I've been out for the morning. Have you finished killing Merkel with your mouth?

    Not quite, theres still faint signs of life in the old trout
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    Nigelb said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    Uncontrollable immigration was a significant concern for a lot of people. The government judges that their interests should be taken into account.
    No, it judged that consideration ought to overrule all others.
    Indeed.

    Unlike several leading Leavers!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    Uncontrollable immigration was a significant concern for a lot of people. The government judges that their interests should be taken into account.
    So why have they failed to apply the restrictions that are available to them right now?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,504
    kinabalu said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Would there be a recording/minutes of the conversation between Merkel and Boris?

    Presumably there is someone in Downing St. taking notes of what is being said?

    If so maybe Downing St. will release the full transcript later.

    If only.

    You'd probably need a translator.



    To understand Boris.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
  • Funny kind of sham, since it was suggested by the UK side and would have left us with 100% of the economic advantages of being in the EU with 0% of the costs, and having left the CFP, CAP, and all the other things the Eurosceptics always said were the principal reason for leaving.

    I mean, really, how utterly bonkers does anyone have to be to think that the EU wanted the backstop as anything other than a fix to the Irish problem?
  • iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY

    Not that totally discredited video again. All out of context quotes, none during the referendum and most saying the opposite of what is implied.
  • Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except unfortunately staying in the Customs Union is impossible. Membership of the CU requires membership of the EU.

    We could be in a CU like Turkey buf that would be disastrous. It is the reason none of the EFTA countries have never joined a CU with the EU.
  • tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,565
    Feels from the frustration that several pennies have dropped this morning.
    We have naff all leverage over the EU. We haven't chipped away at their solidarity one iota. We can shout as loud as we want but the Irish border isn't sorting itself. The Good Friday agreement is stronger than our determination to overcome it. Ripping up 40 years of regulation with no destination in place is as 'unclean' as they come. And no-one is coming to save us from ourselves.

    The one silver lining, is that Boris is left holding the parcel when the music stops. It's all on him. And so far, he looks like he's playing at being PM rather than living up to the job.

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,236

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
    The idea that it was colonialism or ‘eternal subjugation’ delusional.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    geoffw said:

    Mein Irisch kind, wo weilest Du?

    Byronic said:

    If Number 10 have overspun it then it should be very easy to clear up.

    Merkel could very easily come out and say "of course Northern Ireland can leave the customs union, it is afterall a part of the United Kingdom and we respect that, we believe we can get a deal respecting that". Go on then!
    Quite. Merkel hasn't denied it, and she won't, because, basically, she said it.

    Remainers here need to get a grip and see the EU for what it is. A racket.
    Nick Ridley in 1990 on the EMU: "a German racket designed to take over the whole of Europe".
    He wasn't wrong.
    You, as well as @SeanT , @Alanbrooke and others, own property/interests in Continental Europe. At what point do you realise that this isn't an entertaining discussion on the Internet but a real issue that will affect your lives? If the Russians invade/encourage civil unrest in the eastern EU as it has done in so many countries, do you realise how badly that would affect you IRL?
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    Streeter said:

    Streeter said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.
    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.
    It's a tired cliche that deserves to be rammed down the throats of the lying Brexiteers on the hour every hour.
    None of us would be any poorer for the lack of your continued presence on this site.
    Face up to your wrongdoing. Redemption is within reach. A special place in hell is not inevitable.
    The thought of having to share it with you might give pause for thought....
    L'enfer c'est les autres.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/simoncoveney/status/1181529555397480452?s=19

    Irish there calling for regime change to get their way

    Or a change of heart from the current regime. But carry on, please do try to distil as much outrage as you can from this, it's doing us all so much good.
    I'm glad it's doing you some good. Any outrage is not enough for the perfidious treachery of the EU. Olive oil, shamrock and fat sausage weirdos.
    I'm a little embarrassed for you right now.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,288
    An FTA was always an option as the range of possibilities envisioned by the PD. What Boris's proposal lacked was some arrangement that would maintain the international legality of maintaining no border checks between Boris's desired end of transition and the technological border coming to fruition.

    If Boris could have included in his proposal some innovative mechanism for achieving that legality, either by maintaining alignment either in total or up to a place where a normal border could be operated, to run until such time as his tech border and FTA could be put into full effect, then his desired end state could have flown.
  • Nigelb said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
    The idea that it was colonialism or ‘eternal subjugation’ delusional.
    Tell that to Selmayr.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Nigelb said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    Uncontrollable immigration was a significant concern for a lot of people. The government judges that their interests should be taken into account.
    No, it judged that consideration ought to overrule all others.

    (And, of course, ‘uncontrollable’ was a gross exaggeration.)
    Uncontrollable in the sense we weren’t allowed to restrict it
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    Funny kind of sham, since it was suggested by the UK side and would have left us with 100% of the economic advantages of being in the EU with 0% of the costs, and having left the CFP, CAP, and all the other things the Eurosceptics always said were the principal reason for leaving.

    I mean, really, how utterly bonkers does anyone have to be to think that the EU wanted the backstop as anything other than a fix to the Irish problem?
    It was the economic bits without the political bits. It was what they said they wanted.

    Now not having the political bits is somehow a problem (despite it being what they wanted), which means we have to do without the economic bit too.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited October 2019

    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com

    No

    That is a compilation of quotes taken out of context from tv shows.

    Heidi Allen’s lies/flakiness that I quoted are not taken out of context, they cannot be misinterpreted, and are from Hustings from the 2017 General Election.


    https://youtu.be/B9yl3_EprVI
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,215

    Funny kind of sham, since it was suggested by the UK side and would have left us with 100% of the economic advantages of being in the EU with 0% of the costs, and having left the CFP, CAP, and all the other things the Eurosceptics always said were the principal reason for leaving.

    I mean, really, how utterly bonkers does anyone have to be to think that the EU wanted the backstop as anything other than a fix to the Irish problem?
    Richard, whilst the lock & bolt you're holding there technically is in full working order No 10's horse has galloped off through 20 furlongs of wheat fields.
  • Funny kind of sham, since it was suggested by the UK side and would have left us with 100% of the economic advantages of being in the EU with 0% of the costs, and having left the CFP, CAP, and all the other things the Eurosceptics always said were the principal reason for leaving.

    I mean, really, how utterly bonkers does anyone have to be to think that the EU wanted the backstop as anything other than a fix to the Irish problem?
    Except it wasn't suggested by the UK. It was suggested by the EU and May was dragged their kicking and screaming until her abject humiliation and surrender.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,151

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Had the UK remained in the Single Market and Customs Union we would still have had full free movement from the EU, still been subject to European Courts rulings and still been unable to do our own trade deals.

    It would have been Remain in all but name
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/simoncoveney/status/1181529555397480452?s=19

    Irish there calling for regime change to get their way

    Or a change of heart from the current regime. But carry on, please do try to distil as much outrage as you can from this, it's doing us all so much good.
    I'm glad it's doing you some good. Any outrage is not enough for the perfidious treachery of the EU. Olive oil, shamrock and fat sausage weirdos.
    I'm a little embarrassed for you right now.
    I wouldn't be, I'm having fun. No point clutching at pearls and lifting petticoats. I realise in the super woke world such stereotypes of national identities are terribly awful but on the other hand, I dont care. The EU are taking the piss out of us, I am content to do the same to them.
  • Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131

    viewcode said:

    This a a betting site where percentages and probability are understood and dissected to come up with realistic outcomes, so I'm hoping some clever souls with maybe a medical background can help me make sense of some figures.....
    After breast cancer surgery, where there is no more evidence of cancer in the body, a woman has an 82% chance of surviving 10 years or more without any further treatment.
    Radiotherapy adds another 5% to that.
    Hormone treatment adds another 2% to that.
    Chemotherapy adds another 5% to that.
    What do these figures really show?
    The question is, knowing the risks and side effects of chemotherapy, would you decline or accept it in this instance?

    When you say "Chemotherapy adds another 5% to that", do you mean "...adds another 5% to the 82%" or "...adds another 5% to the 82+5+2%"?
    Discussed very early in the thread. Have a look back. A lot of people who know their stats helped our friend TFS who is understandably worried.
    I have looked earlier in the thread and you've confused my point with another point. I wasn't asking if the numbers were additive, I was asking if they were independent. If the chemotherapy number changes if you have had radiotherapy, then that affects the advice
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Every now and then Leavers moan that it's a persistent myth that Remainers spread that they're obsessed about the War.

    And then we get efforts like this:

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181542541583273985
  • Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    If it was a misunderstanding it should be possible to clear it up, if it was a lie then it would be possible to deny it.

    If it's the truth then the backstop was never in good faith and I told you so.
  • All the dodgy briefings, all the blaming of foreigners, all the economic pain, the loss of our freedoms, the crashing of the UK's standing, the trashing of our constitution, all of it is for one purpose only: so that Boris Johnson can be PM. Literally nothing else matters to him.
  • Pulpstar said:



    Richard, whilst the lock & bolt you're holding there technically is in full working order No 10's horse has galloped off through 20 furlongs of wheat fields.

    Oh, quite. The loons have succeeded in driving the country mad. This won't end well! As I said earlier, those amicable mini-deals aren't looking too likely, are they?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    If it was a misunderstanding it should be possible to clear it up, if it was a lie then it would be possible to deny it.

    If it's the truth then the backstop was never in good faith and I told you so.
    I don't think the EU are going to waste any time getting into a slanging match with Boris Johnson. They've mentally consigned him to the holding pen for now.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    This is rubbish. 1. The Germans have not denied it - amazingly 2, the EU is trying to distance themselves from what she said, 3, you don't have to overspin this phone call, even if just 20% of it is true it is beyond explosive

    It essentially gives the lie to the position that the UK was "always sovereign within the EU", Because Merkel is saying, perhaps correctly, that the price of leaving HAS to be ceding control of one of the UK's constituent nations, and letting the EU govern NI as a trading colony (without the NI locals having a vote)

    It is economic annexation, without representation.

    It may be a cold statement of the facts, but it is fucking ridiculously provocative. Stupid woman. What is her game?!
    .
    Bollocks. Northern Ireland should never have been allowed to be separated from the rest of Ireland as was laid down in the 1912 act. It was only the UK government giving in to the Curragh mutineers that led to the current set up
    And you accuse Leavers of living in the past. FFS.
    If Ireland hadn't been partitioned, we wouldn't need to worry about any Backstop.
    The probability is that the UVF would have won the three way civil war and entrenched their dominance across the entire island
    Doubt it given that SF won 73 of the 105 Irish seats in 1918.
    The Irish Civil War

    It was won by the Free State with the support of the U.K. I suspect the U.K. would have supported Ulster
    Free State Army was SF/IRA in large part.
    It was Michael Collins, the National Army and the UK
    [Deleted. I have to go back to work]
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited October 2019
    HYUFD said:
    If the government release the full transcript of this conversation and if Merkel did say NI can never leave the customs union, I wonder whether Parliament might repeal the Benn act in the face of this aggression?

    I note the Benn act only passed by 28 votes so there wasn't a large majority for it?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Every now and then Leavers moan that it's a persistent myth that Remainers spread that they're obsessed about the War.

    And then we get efforts like this:

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181542541583273985

    Unfortunately there are enough absolute cretins to mean what is a lazy retort cannot be discounted as without some basis

    All the dodgy briefings, all the blaming of foreigners, all the economic pain, the loss of our freedoms, the crashing of the UK's standing, the trashing of our constitution, all of it is for one purpose only: so that Boris Johnson can be PM. Literally nothing else matters to him.

    Thats true. Its blatant and shameless. But further discussions are also pointless, that part is also true
  • what a chuffing shambles...
  • Every now and then Leavers moan that it's a persistent myth that Remainers spread that they're obsessed about the War.

    And then we get efforts like this:

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181542541583273985

    Yeah it's completely unnecessary. It's almost as embarrassing as the idea that we could ever agree to subjugation in the backstop without a unilateral exit or say in the rules we would be subjected to.

    The EU hasn't negotiated in good faith. It's no deal or revoke now. Time to pick a side.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Just been trawling twitter, and via Twitter, the continental press.

    The consensus in Germany and Brussels is that this is true. Indeed, they are surprised at the British surprise. From the German perspective, this is just Merkel bluntly pointing out what has been obvious for a long time, but disguised for the sake of diplomacy.

    And the point is good. The special status of NI and the GFA means NI can never leave the CU, unless and until the Irish want that to happen (which again means never, for practical purposes)

    Perhaps Mrs Merkel didn't think through the implications for Britain. Her doctrine means the UK ITSELF can never really leave the EU, not without losing a constituent nation of the UK.

    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    edited October 2019

    HYUFD said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    This is rubbish. 1. The Germans have not denied it - amazingly 2, the EU is trying to distance themselves from what she said, 3, you don't have to overspin this phone call, even if just 20% of it is true it is beyond explosive

    It essentially gives the lie to the position that the UK was "always sovereign within the EU", Because Merkel is saying, perhaps correctly, that the price of leaving HAS to be ceding control of one of the UK's constituent nations, and letting the EU govern NI as a trading colony (without the NI locals having a vote)

    It is economic annexation, without representation.

    It may be a cold statement of the facts, but it is fucking ridiculously provocative. Stupid woman. What is her game?!
    .
    Bollocks. Northern Ireland should never have been allowed to be separated from the rest of Ireland as was laid down in the 1912 act. It was only the UK government giving in to the Curragh mutineers that led to the current set up
    And you accuse Leavers of living in the past. FFS.
    If Ireland hadn't been partitioned, we wouldn't need to worry about any Backstop.
    The probability is that the UVF would have won the three way civil war and entrenched their dominance across the entire island
    Doubt it given that SF won 73 of the 105 Irish seats in 1918.
    The Irish Civil War

    It was won by the Free State with the support of the U.K. I suspect the U.K. would have supported Ulster
    Free State Army was SF/IRA in large part.
    No, Sinn Fein and the IRA were fighting with De Valera and the anti Treaty forces against the pro Treaty forces of the Free State headed by Michael Collins
    The Treaty caused a split in the IRA. The Civil War was an SF/IRA civil war.
    The Irish name of all flavours of the IRA, pre-Treaty, pro-Treaty, anti-Treaty, Official, Provisional, Continuity, “Real” and “I Can’t Believe It’s Not The” has been “Óglaigh na hÉireann” - “Volunteers of Ireland”. That was also the Irish name of the National Army during the Irish Civil War and remains the name of the Irish Defence Forces today.

    They all claim continuity with and descent from the Irish Volunteers of 1913 and the Irish Republican Army that defeated the British in 1921.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Why waste all this time on pointless discussions? They clearly don't mind wasting their piss as they are playing for time.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237

    Yep. I think British politics drives this.

    If there was a strong Tory Government with a big majority then a Deal along Boris’s lines would already be being done.

    Agree and disagree.

    Yes, if BJ wins big in a GE he will get an exit Deal done.

    But no, it won't be this one. It will be the WA with NI only backstop, possibly time limited. Plus the PD rewritten for a Canada style FTA for GB.

    Certainly not No Deal. I'm happier than ever laying that. Needs a majority to do it, but if he gets a majority he does not have to, and thus won't.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    bRExiT isN't RaCiST
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:
    If the government release the the full transcript of this conversation and if Merkel did say the NI can never leave the customs union, I wonder whether Parliament might repeal the Benn act in the face of this aggression?

    I note the Benn act only passed by 28 votes so there wasn't a large majority for it?
    Not gonna happen. It would require a bunch of MPs to

    1 ) admit they were wrong on reading the EU's intentions and

    2 ) admit they were now prepared to countenance No Deal.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    Can they get any lower?

    No doubt the answer is yes.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,003
    edited October 2019

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/simoncoveney/status/1181529555397480452?s=19

    Irish there calling for regime change to get their way

    Or a change of heart from the current regime. But carry on, please do try to distil as much outrage as you can from this, it's doing us all so much good.
    I'm glad it's doing you some good. Any outrage is not enough for the perfidious treachery of the EU. Olive oil, shamrock and fat sausage weirdos.
    I'm a little embarrassed for you right now.
    I wouldn't be, I'm having fun. No point clutching at pearls and lifting petticoats. I realise in the super woke world such stereotypes of national identities are terribly awful but on the other hand, I dont care. The EU are taking the piss out of us, I am content to do the same to them.
    Except the stereotypes are broken. It's the British (or more specifically the English) who are ranting & bellowing with snotters all over their quivering upper lips while whipping up populist outrage, while the EU looks on with patrician disdain.
  • Pulpstar said:



    Richard, whilst the lock & bolt you're holding there technically is in full working order No 10's horse has galloped off through 20 furlongs of wheat fields.

    Oh, quite. The loons have succeeded in driving the country mad. This won't end well! As I said earlier, those amicable mini-deals aren't looking too likely, are they?
    Still likely eventually.

    The EU don't take no deal seriously as they don't think Parliament will permit it. Doesn't matter how many Aces you hold in your hand if you tell the opposition in advance you'll fold if they push all in.
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Byronic said:

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Just been trawling twitter, and via Twitter, the continental press.

    The consensus in Germany and Brussels is that this is true. Indeed, they are surprised at the British surprise. From the German perspective, this is just Merkel bluntly pointing out what has been obvious for a long time, but disguised for the sake of diplomacy.

    And the point is good. The special status of NI and the GFA means NI can never leave the CU, unless and until the Irish want that to happen (which again means never, for practical purposes)

    Perhaps Mrs Merkel didn't think through the implications for Britain. Her doctrine means the UK ITSELF can never really leave the EU, not without losing a constituent nation of the UK.

    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

    And there's no pressure on anyone in the EU to negotiate, because the Benn Act has tied the UK government's hands behind its back. Everybody knows this, so this phase is just a phoney war before a GE takes place.

    Hardcore Remainers will want to delay and delay for as long as they can because they know delay equals economic uncertainty and hopefully a better case for Remaining.

    Remaining, however, would be a hideous state of affairs for the EU. Can you imagine the UK being part of the EU after all of this!?!
  • Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    If it was a misunderstanding it should be possible to clear it up, if it was a lie then it would be possible to deny it.

    If it's the truth then the backstop was never in good faith and I told you so.

    There is nothing that Merkel can say that will convince those who want the Cummings briefing to be true that it is not true. So there is really no point in engaging.

  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    Noo said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    We should have retained the four freedoms.
    We still should
    Personally I agree but in my view it is one of the key reasons why the vote was lost - and would probably be lost again. The UK benefit system is way more generaous than many of the poorer EU countries and there is no political will here to change it. Hence the hostility to FoM.
  • Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    Do you think Boris's majority will be closer to 100 or 200 seats?

    Biggest landslide since 1931?
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Am I missing something here? Why are people (pretending to be) outraged by Merkel saying Northern Ireland has to remain in the customs union in order for there to be a deal? Whether you agree with it or not, that's been their position for years.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,724

    So when do BMW and prosecco producers start knocking down Merkel's door asking for a Brexit deal?

    They are cutting it way too fine for my liking.

    We hold all the cards. It will be the easiest deal in history etc etc...
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
    One might say that they were trying to liberate the colony of the Six Counties we have subjugated since 1169, perhaps?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Noo said:

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    bRExiT isN't RaCiST
    True. But Leave.EU - or some significant part of the leadership - quite possibly are
  • what a chuffing shambles...

    Boris = Spurs

    Merkel = Bayern Munich?

    Sorry, not sorry.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    isam said:

    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com

    No

    That is a compilation of quotes taken out of context from tv shows.

    Heidi Allen’s lies/flakiness that I quoted are not taken out of context, they cannot be misinterpreted, and are from Hustings from the 2017 General Election.


    https://youtu.be/B9yl3_EprVI
    Same applies for Sarah Wollaston. These new LibDem MPs were either stupid or liars.

    They are welome to them.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    Charles said:

    Noo said:

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    bRExiT isN't RaCiST
    True. But Leave.EU - or some significant part of the leadership - quite possibly are
    "quite possibly"
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237

    Funny kind of sham, since it was suggested by the UK side and would have left us with 100% of the economic advantages of being in the EU with 0% of the costs, and having left the CFP, CAP, and all the other things the Eurosceptics always said were the principal reason for leaving.

    I mean, really, how utterly bonkers does anyone have to be to think that the EU wanted the backstop as anything other than a fix to the Irish problem?

    Not bonkers - just gullible and nationalistic. Which well describes a large section of the British public. Hence the Johnson/Cummings strategy for the GE. It is probably going to work, IMO, if they get the 2019 poll.
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    Byronic said:

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Just been trawling twitter, and via Twitter, the continental press.

    The consensus in Germany and Brussels is that this is true. Indeed, they are surprised at the British surprise. From the German perspective, this is just Merkel bluntly pointing out what has been obvious for a long time, but disguised for the sake of diplomacy.

    And the point is good. The special status of NI and the GFA means NI can never leave the CU, unless and until the Irish want that to happen (which again means never, for practical purposes)

    Perhaps Mrs Merkel didn't think through the implications for Britain. Her doctrine means the UK ITSELF can never really leave the EU, not without losing a constituent nation of the UK.

    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

    Berlin "doesn't want to get into briefing and counter-briefing", says well known brexiteer (checks notes) Katya Adler.

    So yes, it seems Merkel said it. Disastrous statecraft. Prospect of deal vanishingly modest.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    Well, at least it’s out in the open now. Leavers are racists. ALL Leavers.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239

    isam said:

    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com

    No

    That is a compilation of quotes taken out of context from tv shows.

    Heidi Allen’s lies/flakiness that I quoted are not taken out of context, they cannot be misinterpreted, and are from Hustings from the 2017 General Election.


    https://youtu.be/B9yl3_EprVI
    Same applies for Sarah Wollaston. These new LibDem MPs were either stupid or liars.

    They are welome to them.
    Our current Prime Minister wrote two fervently argued articles, one for Leave and one for Remain, on the same day. Our Government is full of people who voted for Theresa May's deal and are now saying that its precepts are wholly unacceptable.

    If inconstancy is a capital offence, then Allen and Wollaston will be a long way down the queue.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478
    I bet that poster of Mrs M has been shown on here as much as anywhere else!
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Every now and then Leavers moan that it's a persistent myth that Remainers spread that they're obsessed about the War.

    And then we get efforts like this:

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181542541583273985

    Yeah it's completely unnecessary. It's almost as embarrassing as the idea that we could ever agree to subjugation in the backstop without a unilateral exit or say in the rules we would be subjected to.

    The EU hasn't negotiated in good faith. It's no deal or revoke now. Time to pick a side.
    The Irish are serving their revenge cold it seems.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,237
    Nigelb said:

    The idea that it was colonialism or ‘eternal subjugation’ delusional.

    NI 'trapped' in the SM/CU which they don't wish to leave.

    It's subjugation, Jim, but not as we know it.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited October 2019
    Danny565 said:

    Am I missing something here? Why are people (pretending to be) outraged by Merkel saying Northern Ireland has to remain in the customs union in order for there to be a deal? Whether you agree with it or not, that's been their position for years.

    In which case why are people angry at boris claiming she said it?

    Confected outrage from no.10 and in response - the actual substance of the discussion seems barely to concern, just how it is being spun about precise wording.

    And as we know at PB pedantry.com, when the argument and anger is over precise wording, its probably trivial or bollocks.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    Drutt said:

    Byronic said:

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Just been trawling twitter, and via Twitter, the continental press.

    The consensus in Germany and Brussels is that this is true. Indeed, they are surprised at the British surprise. From the German perspective, this is just Merkel bluntly pointing out what has been obvious for a long time, but disguised for the sake of diplomacy.

    And the point is good. The special status of NI and the GFA means NI can never leave the CU, unless and until the Irish want that to happen (which again means never, for practical purposes)

    Perhaps Mrs Merkel didn't think through the implications for Britain. Her doctrine means the UK ITSELF can never really leave the EU, not without losing a constituent nation of the UK.

    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

    Berlin "doesn't want to get into briefing and counter-briefing", says well known brexiteer (checks notes) Katya Adler.

    So yes, it seems Merkel said it. Disastrous statecraft. Prospect of deal vanishingly modest.
    Except, how does it play out if there is no further extension beyond 31st October? All there would be is revoke (capitulation to Germany/EU), No Deal (a majority of MPs have passed a law saying utterly unacceptable) or May's Shit Deal (now acknowledged by Germany as a land grab by the EU)?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    I bet that poster of Mrs M has been shown on here as much as anywhere else!

    Leave.EU have 271,000 followers on Twitter. This is being widely seen.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Merkel has been foolish (to put it mildly) if reports are correct.

    And the ranting response from Tusk indicates those reports may well be true.

    The press are going to have a field day and it is going to be increasingly difficult for remainers in parliament not to look like quislings regardless of their true motivations.

    Very unfortunate for remainers.
  • Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    If it was a misunderstanding it should be possible to clear it up, if it was a lie then it would be possible to deny it.

    If it's the truth then the backstop was never in good faith and I told you so.

    There is nothing that Merkel can say that will convince those who want the Cummings briefing to be true that it is not true. So there is really no point in engaging.

    Do YOU think it's not true?
  • DougSeal said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    It should be obvious that both sides need to make more effort to make NI a special case and keeping it in the SM and CU simply isn’t acceptable to the UK, nor is using it as a Trojan horse to keep the rest of the UK in close alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
    One might say that they were trying to liberate the colony of the Six Counties we have subjugated since 1169, perhaps?
    No one could not. The counties are not a colony they are a sovereign part of our country as recognised by international law and the Good Friday Agreement. Why do you want to tear up the Good Friday Agreement?
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    SunnyJim said:

    Merkel has been foolish (to put it mildly) if reports are correct.

    And the ranting response from Tusk indicates those reports may well be true.

    The press are going to have a field day and it is going to be increasingly difficult for remainers in parliament not to look like quislings regardless of their true motivations.

    Very unfortunate for remainers.

    "quislings".
    Christ, the fucking state of you.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Byronic said:

    Cyclefree said:
    I would prefer it if it's not true! I would be delighted to see a Merkel spokesperson say the opposite but we are still waiting. I wouldn't hold my breath on that if I was you.
    Why would they waste the steam of their piss getting involved in a slanging match with a government that has clearly decided to use them to whip up a mob?

    Just been trawling twitter, and via Twitter, the continental press.

    The consensus in Germany and Brussels is that this is true. Indeed, they are surprised at the British surprise. From the German perspective, this is just Merkel bluntly pointing out what has been obvious for a long time, but disguised for the sake of diplomacy.

    And the point is good. The special status of NI and the GFA means NI can never leave the CU, unless and until the Irish want that to happen (which again means never, for practical purposes)

    Perhaps Mrs Merkel didn't think through the implications for Britain. Her doctrine means the UK ITSELF can never really leave the EU, not without losing a constituent nation of the UK.

    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

    Wasn't it obvious from the Joint Report in December 2017?

    That was when Remainers were triumphantly using its logic to argue that (i) the UK had promised NI would stay in Customs Union/Single Market, (ii) the UK had promised the DUP that there would be no divergence between NI and GB, (iii) therefore the whole UK would stay in the single market and customs union.

    This was the Joint Report signed up to by a Cabinet before the flounces from Davis and Johnson.

    Quite how May managed to get from that starting point to the backstop, dashing all the hopes of Remainers for a soft Brexit, is beyond me, but she's received precious little credit for it.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,724

    isam said:

    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com

    No

    That is a compilation of quotes taken out of context from tv shows.

    Heidi Allen’s lies/flakiness that I quoted are not taken out of context, they cannot be misinterpreted, and are from Hustings from the 2017 General Election.


    https://youtu.be/B9yl3_EprVI
    Same applies for Sarah Wollaston. These new LibDem MPs were either stupid or liars.

    They are welome to them.
    Or changed their minds because of the folly of Tory party policy?
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    I bet that poster of Mrs M has been shown on here as much as anywhere else!

    Leave.EU have 271,000 followers on Twitter. This is being widely seen.
    Are you one of them?
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    DougSeal said:



    The Irish are serving their revenge cold it seems.

    It is a brave game they are playing because if the UK does end up leaving without a deal the Irish are going to be gutted out.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited October 2019

    what a chuffing shambles...

    Boris = Spurs

    Merkel = Bayern Munich?

    Sorry, not sorry.
    Lost in the noise was the fact that Spurs made the better chances in that defeat (if you include penalties)

  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    Will Boris be giving a statement to Parliament about this Merkel telephone call this afternoon?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    Foxy said:

    isam said:

    iSam

    Like all those leading Brexiteers...

    https://www.youtube.com

    No

    That is a compilation of quotes taken out of context from tv shows.

    Heidi Allen’s lies/flakiness that I quoted are not taken out of context, they cannot be misinterpreted, and are from Hustings from the 2017 General Election.


    https://youtu.be/B9yl3_EprVI
    Same applies for Sarah Wollaston. These new LibDem MPs were either stupid or liars.

    They are welome to them.
    Or changed their minds because of the folly of Tory party policy?
    Wollaston out and out lied to me.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    SunnyJim said:

    Merkel has been foolish (to put it mildly) if reports are correct.

    And the ranting response from Tusk indicates those reports may well be true.

    The press are going to have a field day and it is going to be increasingly difficult for remainers in parliament not to look like quislings regardless of their true motivations.

    Very unfortunate for remainers.

    Indeed. And also very unfortunate for people who live in the UK and the EU. I made the point above that this is not an arbitrary discussion on the internet but a real-life thing. I wish people would get their head round this.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,616
    Noo said:

    SunnyJim said:

    Merkel has been foolish (to put it mildly) if reports are correct.

    And the ranting response from Tusk indicates those reports may well be true.

    The press are going to have a field day and it is going to be increasingly difficult for remainers in parliament not to look like quislings regardless of their true motivations.

    Very unfortunate for remainers.

    "quislings".
    Christ, the fucking state of you.
    You might be getting a bit squeamish. But that is how millions of voters are going to read it.....
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    edited October 2019
    SunnyJim said:

    DougSeal said:



    The Irish are serving their revenge cold it seems.

    It is a brave game they are playing because if the UK does end up leaving without a deal the Irish are going to be gutted out.
    They have the support of 26 neighbours though, and they’ll probably end up with their country reunited at last.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I don't wish to frighten @Richard_Nabavi but this is a point that he's regularly made and which Dan Hodges has now picked up:

    https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1181542212888416256
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Noo said:

    Charles said:

    Noo said:

    Looking forward to an election campaign of this?

    https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1181515644954714114

    bRExiT isN't RaCiST
    True. But Leave.EU - or some significant part of the leadership - quite possibly are
    "quite possibly"
    I don't like to make serious allegations lightly.
  • what a chuffing shambles...

    Boris = Spurs

    Merkel = Bayern Munich?

    Sorry, not sorry.
    Just wait for the next election.

    Boris = Jurgen Klopp

    Labour = Manchester United

    Corbyn = OGS
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    Unless Bozo releases a tape of the conversation then people will believe what they want to believe.

  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    kinabalu said:

    Yep. I think British politics drives this.

    If there was a strong Tory Government with a big majority then a Deal along Boris’s lines would already be being done.

    Agree and disagree.

    Yes, if BJ wins big in a GE he will get an exit Deal done.

    But no, it won't be this one. It will be the WA with NI only backstop, possibly time limited. Plus the PD rewritten for a Canada style FTA for GB.

    Certainly not No Deal. I'm happier than ever laying that. Needs a majority to do it, but if he gets a majority he does not have to, and thus won't.
    I think it depends on the size of the majority. The longer this goes on the more moderates get replaced by ERG types. As that number approaches 50% he ends up needing all the seats to pass something against their opposition.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Byronic said:


    But then, it's not Merkel's job to teach British politicians just how much sovereignty they have handed to the EU, in the last four decades.

    It isn't the political class who are having the blindfold removed...it is the voters.

    I can't wait for the GE, it is going to be a massacre.
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786

    DougSeal said:

    Charles said:

    Byronic said:

    Christ. So the Germans want war, rather than just dystopian no deal?

    Spam fritters it is. Stock up now.
    Yes, I’m pissed off by the attitude of the EU on this too, as dickish as Johnson’s administration is too.

    Just imagine how dickish the EU really would be if we didn't hold all cards.
    That’s a very tired cliche, almost as much as the one about Parliament taking back control.

    Itose alignment.

    The answer, as it always has been, is to leave the EU but for the entire UK to remain in the single market and customs union.

    This solution should have been effected in 2016. Had it been so, we'd now all be getting on with our lives, the economy would be in decent shape, the Irish question would be satisfied, and we'd have the necessary trading certainty for business.
    Except that the EU refused to bend on the 4 Freedoms.

    Where we should have ended up at multiple points since the days of Major is with some kind of affiliate status.

    A generation of politicians have failed us
    They not only bent, they broke the four freedoms apart for the backstop. It was a masterpiece of British diplomacy. A victory for the ages. The impossible was made possible - and all thrown away by the ignorant arrogance of the ERG.
    The backstop was a trap. Eternal subjugation and no say in our customs or rules or regulations and no way out.

    It is colonialism and despicable and the mask has slipped. The idea it's a triumph is pathetic.
    One might say that they were trying to liberate the colony of the Six Counties we have subjugated since 1169, perhaps?
    No one could not. The counties are not a colony they are a sovereign part of our country as recognised by international law and the Good Friday Agreement. Why do you want to tear up the Good Friday Agreement?
    It would also be a daft line for the EU to take given that France, Spain and the Netherlands all have overseas departments as constituent parts of their nations. With much less generous representation at national level too. But then looking at what the French did to Algeria on the way out they probably felt compelled to acquiesce
  • The

    Every now and then Leavers moan that it's a persistent myth that Remainers spread that they're obsessed about the War.

    And then we get efforts like this:

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181542541583273985

    That's probably clever politics from them. Boris wants to look like the nice, reasonable chap who did his best but was rebuffed. If they can instead attribute the collapse of the negotiations to his intransigence and bellicosity, then No Deal and its ramifications will hang about Boris's neck like an albatross. Nigel would prefer surrender from Boris, but failing that a disastrous No Deal with Boris as its architect would suffice.
This discussion has been closed.