Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
Polling support for unicorn Brexits should not be extrapolated to public support for any adverse consequences of a real Brexit. Voters will blame the government.
In terms of UK law, if we approach early October with a No Deal looming then the House of Commons will vote down the Government. There will then be 14 days for a vote of confidence in an alternative to succeed.
In terms of the EU, the moment they see a VONC succeed they will extend Article 50. They will then await the result of a General Election.
I remember some months ago being assured on here many times that Parliament couldn't prevent No Deal. I told you then this was nonsense. It remains nonsense.
That won't stop the likes of HUYFD living in their fantasy world. Speaking of which, does Bill Cash still think we left the EU on March 31st?!
In terms of UK law, if we approach early October with a No Deal looming then the House of Commons will vote down the Government. There will then be 14 days for a vote of confidence in an alternative to succeed.
In terms of the EU, the moment they see a VONC succeed they will extend Article 50. They will then await the result of a General Election.
I remember some months ago being assured on here many times that Parliament couldn't prevent No Deal. I told you then this was nonsense. It remains nonsense.
How can the EU unilaterally extend Article 50 if a UK PM refuses to play ball. Which leaves the question of who is UK PM in the period following a lost VONC. Anti no-dealers remain far too blase in their ability to prevent it.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
In terms of UK law, if we approach early October with a No Deal looming then the House of Commons will vote down the Government. There will then be 14 days for a vote of confidence in an alternative to succeed.
In terms of the EU, the moment they see a VONC succeed they will extend Article 50. They will then await the result of a General Election.
I remember some months ago being assured on here many times that Parliament couldn't prevent No Deal. I told you then this was nonsense. It remains nonsense.
How can the EU unilaterally extend Article 50 if a UK PM refuses to play ball. Which leaves the question of who is UK PM in the period following a lost VONC.
Quite. Axiom 11 seems quite sound to me. It is unknowable.
An excellent albeit depressing piece. The Tories are just waiting to get utterly p*ssed out of their minds for a few weeks during the Boris jolly. Nothing else matters to them at present other than the excitement surrounding that prospect. When they finally wake up after all that the hangover's going to be a real stinker.
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
This means MPs will not be able to no-confidence the new Prime Minister, Boris, Hunt or Corbyn, and will have limited time to block no-deal Brexit (assuming either Boris or Hunt really wants that, which is open to doubt).
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Sorry to tell diehard Remainers but they will.
If the Commons refuses to respect the Leave vote then as Yougov showed yesterday Leavers will elect a new Commons that will whether that requires PM Boris or PM Farage they do not care, they will not rest and they will not stop until they get the Brexit they voted for
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
Polling support for unicorn Brexits should not be extrapolated to public support for any adverse consequences of a real Brexit. Voters will blame the government.
As it seems we will only get Brexit with a Boris or Farage Government forget blame they will vote for that to actually deliver Brexit in the first place, we are still in the EU for goodness sake 3 years after the Leave vote
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Two things I took from the Posh by-election.
1. The Brexit Party had a pretty good candidate, and it was excellent timing. They didn't do it. The Brexit Party will not get (m)any MPS in a GE.
2. Jazza's fudge tasted fine. Corbyn played it right, whereas Starmer would have lost Posh.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
Polling support for unicorn Brexits should not be extrapolated to public support for any adverse consequences of a real Brexit. Voters will blame the government.
As it seems we will only get Brexit with a Boris or Farage Government forget blame they will vote for that to actually deliver Brexit in the first place, we are still in the EU for goodness sake 3 years after the Leave vote
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
Utter crap.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
This means MPs will not be able to no-confidence the new Prime Minister, Boris, Hunt or Corbyn, and will have limited time to block no-deal Brexit (assuming either Boris or Hunt really wants that, which is open to doubt).
Bizarre.
5th September to October 15th is six weeks. More than ample time for a Vote of No Confidence.
We had all this guff before about Parliament 'not being able to prevent No Deal / Brexit blah blah.'
An excellent albeit depressing piece. The Tories are just waiting to get utterly p*ssed out of their minds for a few weeks during the Boris jolly. Nothing else matters to them at present other than the excitement surrounding that prospect. When they finally wake up after all that the hangover's going to be a real stinker.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
Utter crap.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Fraud or no aside, there was a lot going for TBP in Posh.
They had a lot of breaks -- great timing, and a pretty plausible local candidate in a Leave voting seat where the previous MP was hauled off to jail.
They didn't do it, even when they had all the breaks. They didn't do it.
There are not going to be 100 Brexit Party MPs after the GE. There are not going to be 10. I'll be surprised if there is even 1.
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
Utter crap.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
All so true. No one is listening. No one will listen until it is too late.
@Cyclefree has that inconvenient ability to keep bringing facts into the discussion...
Keynes got his dictum about facts and opinions exactly the wrong way round for the 21st century. I always get the most vehement response to my threads that are fact-heavy.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Two things I took from the Posh by-election.
1. The Brexit Party had a pretty good candidate, and it was excellent timing. They didn't do it. The Brexit Party will not get (m)any MPS in a GE.
2. Jazza's fudge tasted fine. Corbyn played it right, whereas Starmer would have lost Posh.
And Labour had an enormous army of foot soldiers to campaign and GOTV. differential turnout in a lower than average overall turnout is key too winning such contests.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Yes, Labour won.
Is there an election that UKIP or the BXP ever met or beat their pre-election polling?
As I recall the Europolling was for BXP to be 35-40%, until the actual vote.
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
Utter crap.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
29 out of 83 seats? A landslide?
31% in a vote when it was a free hit...
In an election format that is much easier for a "non-party" to campaign and secure votes. HYUFD doesn't seem to think that BXP might face any organisational shortcomings in its ability to fight a successful General Election. Which is why i think they can only ever be a spoiler to the Tory vote. In the sense that their only success would be in preventing Tories from winning, and handing seats to Labour/LibDems.
Let's simplify things. Start from the position that EU negotiating elite have no intention of making any concessions before the UK leaves. Their goal has all along been to keep the UK in the EU while offering next to nothing, and the outcome they want to avoid is the UK leaving without a deal. They realise that in a month's time the UK will at last have a PM willing to take the UK out of the EU before a deal is reached, but they think too that there is not a majority in parliament that will allow the PM to do that. So the EU think, probably correctly, that if they double down and continue to offer nothing worth having then the UK will continue in the EU after 31st October.
The consequences of that outcome:
1. The Government would clearly be a lame duck government without a secure working majority. Johnson would be best advised to look to the long term and call an immediate general election on the explicit grounds of delivering a majority capable of delivering Brexit. Let's assume he does so. If so...
2a. The more likely outcome is that the Conservatives would lose seats, opening the way to a Remainer coalition of Labour and Lib Dems which would revoke A50. However, the Conservative Party would not implode and the result would still see off the Brexit Party. That is, Johnson would have been seen to do his best to deliver a Brexit worthy of the name and most Leave voters would recognise that. (The latest YouGov polling is of no value here, because the polling question fails to recognise that scenario.) Furthermore the Conservatives would stay committed to fighting the subsequent GE on a platform to take the UK out of the EU. With the potential for the minority government of Remain parties to be short lived, that election might not be too long coming, bringing with it the prospect of a Conservative government with a sufficient majority to deliver UK withdrawal early in the next decade.
2b. The less likely outcome is that the Conservatives would secure a working parliamentary majority for Leave on a reduced vote share. If so, we will be out by the New Year.
Both of those alternative outcomes (2a and 2b) undermine the premise of the EU's negotiating tactic, namely that there is a parliamentary majority sufficient to prevent the UK leaving without a prior trade agreement being in place. So the final consequence is that:
3. Once a parliamentary majority for Leave is secure, and with a PM willing to pursue "No-Deal" if necessary, the EU will return to the negotiating table. It will this time start with a goal of trying to secure a long term agreement of benefit both the EU and UK, rather than the political goal of trying to avoid the UK leaving.
All so true. No one is listening. No one will listen until it is too late.
@Cyclefree has that inconvenient ability to keep bringing facts into the discussion...
Keynes got his dictum about facts and opinions exactly the wrong way round for the 21st century. I always get the most vehement response to my threads that are fact-heavy.
We have no need of experts.
Best get back in that garden though, Mrs Foxy giving me the beady eye for lingering over lunch.
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
And then the whole country goes up in flames! That you, you short-sighted Conservatives.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Will they be reporting back before the NCA investigation into Aaron Banks ? It’s amazing how long this is taking . One might conclude that political pressure has been placed on them to not report before Brexit actually happens !
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
My expectation of the Boris gameplan (not based on any inside information) is:
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Yes, Labour won.
Is there an election that UKIP or the BXP ever met or beat their pre-election polling?
As I recall the Europolling was for BXP to be 35-40%, until the actual vote.
The range was 27-38%. BXP exactly matched the average, 32%.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Nobody votes for Farage when it really matters.
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
Utter crap.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
29 out of 83 seats? A landslide?
31% in a vote when it was a free hit...
Yet the LibDems got less than 20% with the same free hit.
Overall there's very little to be impressed about from any of the parties.
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
My expectation of the Boris gameplan (not based on any inside information) is:
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
I think that is exactly the Boris Plan.
You must have be his neighbour with the powerful wire-tapping, recording and surveillance equipment !!
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Yes, Labour won.
Is there an election that UKIP or the BXP ever met or beat their pre-election polling?
As I recall the Europolling was for BXP to be 35-40%, until the actual vote.
If you only take their top score in the polls, you could probably say the same of every party.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
If the Conservatives deliver any sort of Brexit in a reasonable timescale, support for TBP will fade away. If they don't it won't. If they win 20%+, they'll win a bunch of seats, regardless of their ground game. If they win under 15%, they'll only take Thurrock.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
My expectation of the Boris gameplan (not based on any inside information) is:
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
But can that actually be done by the 31 October deadline, given the parliamentary timetable?
Or is the assumption that Johnson is lying about the deadline, and that Macron and others are misleading us about the chances of an extension?
This means MPs will not be able to no-confidence the new Prime Minister, Boris, Hunt or Corbyn, and will have limited time to block no-deal Brexit (assuming either Boris or Hunt really wants that, which is open to doubt).
Bizarre.
5th September to October 15th is six weeks. More than ample time for a Vote of No Confidence.
We had all this guff before about Parliament 'not being able to prevent No Deal / Brexit blah blah.'
They did. And they will.
The point is that the Conservative leadership election is scheduled to end 22 July. Boris (or Hunt) will become Prime Minister, and the Commons will rise a couple of days later so there will be no time to no-confidence Boris (or Hunt). Of course, that can be done later but the bookmakers will have paid out by then.
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
My expectation of the Boris gameplan (not based on any inside information) is:
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
Indeed.
I can't see how the Conservatives will tolerate any more drifting along.
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
In this instance, the allegations did not originate with Farage, although I suspect the person who bragged of destroying 1,000 votes was a liar.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Sorry to tell diehard Remainers but they will.
If the Commons refuses to respect the Leave vote then as Yougov showed yesterday Leavers will elect a new Commons that will whether that requires PM Boris or PM Farage they do not care, they will not rest and they will not stop until they get the Brexit they voted for
"as YouGov showed yesterday"
The facts are YoiuGov had Brex 23%, Lib Dem 21%, Lab 20%, Con 20% (18-19 June)
On those it could just as well (and probably more likely be) PM Corbyn or PM Swinson (or Davey).
The Brexit they voted for was a 52:48 Brexit, indicating a soft as possible Brexit - and since then they have deprived the Brexit pursuing Tories of their majority and swung against Brexit (according to the polls).
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Two things I took from the Posh by-election.
1. The Brexit Party had a pretty good candidate, and it was excellent timing. They didn't do it. The Brexit Party will not get (m)any MPS in a GE.
2. Jazza's fudge tasted fine. Corbyn played it right, whereas Starmer would have lost Posh.
Exactly. The stars were perfectly aligned for the Brexit Party after winning the Euros and with a good candidate who got through the campaign without making any howlers and they still lost the by-election. Is anyone betting on a seat that hey believe they will in in a GE?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
I tell you what, I’ll do a whole thread header on the subject of Nigel Farage bad loser when I get a spare moment and I’m home. There are some wider points to be made about delegitimising the system and the damage that populism does to civic structures.
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
And then the whole country goes up in flames! That you, you short-sighted Conservatives.
Just to make sure I understand as I believe you are a LibDem activist:
Your response to a general election result you don’t like is to encourage arson and revolution?
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Is that really the best you can come up. None of that explains why your prediction was so completely and utterly wrong.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Well a party with 5/6 members in complete control of its effective CEO with no policy apart from brexit no deal needs to be stated time and time again because it is not a ‘normal’ political party and in no way should be trusted with power.
This means MPs will not be able to no-confidence the new Prime Minister, Boris, Hunt or Corbyn, and will have limited time to block no-deal Brexit (assuming either Boris or Hunt really wants that, which is open to doubt).
Bizarre.
5th September to October 15th is six weeks. More than ample time for a Vote of No Confidence.
We had all this guff before about Parliament 'not being able to prevent No Deal / Brexit blah blah.'
They did. And they will.
The point is that the Conservative leadership election is scheduled to end 22 July. Boris (or Hunt) will become Prime Minister, and the Commons will rise a couple of days later so there will be no time to no-confidence Boris (or Hunt). Of course, that can be done later but the bookmakers will have paid out by then.
"4. Unionist politicians consider the maintenance of the link with Great Britain more important than anything else. It is their raison d’être. Any different treatment of Northern Ireland implying that it is not somehow as British as the rest of Britain will get a “Never, Never, Never” response."
Unionist politicians do, but a significant number of Unionist voters are not as absolute.
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
I tell you what, I’ll do a whole thread header on the subject of Nigel Farage bad loser when I get a spare moment and I’m home. There are some wider points to be made about delegitimising the system and the damage that populism does to civic structures.
What a refreshing change of angle from the usual thread headers that will be
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
Though if we're discussing people who believe elections have been swindled wasn't it OGH's often stated view that 30+ Conservatives were elected in 2015 through dubious means.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Well a party with 5/6 members in complete control of its effective CEO with no policy apart from brexit no deal needs to be stated time and time again because it is not a ‘normal’ political party and in no way should be trusted with power.
Ok, fine. Won’t have any impact but do what you want to do.
Great header. But my own view is that it IS a relatively safe assumption that Boris Johnson will bottle out of No Deal.
Hopefully he will for the sake of the country. What then? The WA will not get through even with smoke and mirrors (DUP/ERG).
So a GE where anything could happen. Success for TBP may mean a No Deal Brexit. Success for the LibDems may mean Revoke. In both cases in conjunction with one of what we used to call 'the two main parties'.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Funny, some folk on here seem to fixate on the legal structure of the Labour party, trade union influence and who holds the reins of power in the NEC. Perhaps they should find a new line of attack.
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Well a party with 5/6 members in complete control of its effective CEO with no policy apart from brexit no deal needs to be stated time and time again because it is not a ‘normal’ political party and in no way should be trusted with power.
Ok, fine. Won’t have any impact but do what you want to do.
I’m sure you were just as relaxed about Arthur Scargill being president for life of the NUM.
It is rather odd that a party that claims to be about ensuring democracy is a lifetime dictatorship.
All so true. No one is listening. No one will listen until it is too late.
@Cyclefree has that inconvenient ability to keep bringing facts into the discussion...
Keynes got his dictum about facts and opinions exactly the wrong way round for the 21st century. I always get the most vehement response to my threads that are fact-heavy.
Pedants corner: Was not Keynes but C P Scott of The Manchester Guardian
The UK will not elect a single issue Ltd company to power and hand them a blank cheque. I’m afraid no one is going to take to the streets in any numbers to fight for no deal. The world out there is not obsessed by this.
Word of advice. The legal structure of a political party is the ultimate process issue.
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Well a party with 5/6 members in complete control of its effective CEO with no policy apart from brexit no deal needs to be stated time and time again because it is not a ‘normal’ political party and in no way should be trusted with power.
Ok, fine. Won’t have any impact but do what you want to do.
With no local party organisation, it is difficult to see how they would be able to cope with the organisational challenges of a General Election. How they would go through the process of vetting and selecting hundreds of local candidates, how they would ensure that their finances are sufficiently transparent to meet election rules etc etc. Makes the challenges of Euro elections or an isolated by-election look like a cakewalk.
All true. Examination of the issues shows that to leave the EU TMs deal is still the only option, and it must be likely that with the use of smoke and mirrors that is what Boris, if given the chance, will try. But will he get the chance?
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
My expectation of the Boris gameplan (not based on any inside information) is:
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
I think that is exactly the Boris Plan.
You must have be his neighbour with the powerful wire-tapping, recording and surveillance equipment !!
I think he may have to reverse the 31 Oct deadline quickly to avoid losing a VONC to Dominic Grieve and co- thereby running a high chance of losing it to Steve Baker and co. he can't get his plan started until he has formed a government. It is by no means written in stone that he can. The Tories who never ran an anti Brexit candidate may be waiting their chance. If that's right then the more sensible choice is Hunt.
On point 2) That the EU have said they won't renegotiate is a fact. Whether with their backs to the wall they really mean it is not a known fact.
Here are some more facts.
1. Ireland do not want No Deal. 2. The EU do not want No Deal. 3. The sole purpose of the backstop is to prevent a potential future No Deal. 4. The EU don't believe the UK will go to No Deal at the moment.
Keynes famously said when the facts change, I change my mind. In order to change CycleFree's Fact 2, we need to change my Fact 4 (related to CycleFree's Facts 13 and 14).
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Can you give me a full list of all the elections in which Nigel Farage has alleged foul play after his side has lost, and a full list of all the elections in which those allegations have been upheld?
Thanet South 2015 for starters
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
Though if we're discussing people who believe elections have been swindled wasn't it OGH's often stated view that 30+ Conservatives were elected in 2015 through dubious means.
A view sometimes echoed by the PB LibDems.
It must really annoy Lib Dems that the one case proven against the Tories was the Thanet South case. Had we not had a GE in 2017, I wonder if a by election would have happened?
Lol. Was saying something similar to HUYFD on the last thread.
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
Then the voters will simply elect a new House of Commons by electing either a Boris majority on a Deal or No Deal platform before October or the Brexit Party and Nigel Farage to be PM on a No Deal Brexit platform at the next general election after October
Of course, that was quite a while ago. In fact, it was as distant in time to now as now is to a general election if the Tory winner calls one immediately and it goes through the House.
So why should the poll you cite be any closer to opinion then than the poll I cite is to opinion now? feel free to use both sides of the paper in your reply (or, more likely, to ignore the question as not fitting your worldview)
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges. Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective". He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
I thought you wanted examples of people being guilty of alleged fraudulent behaviour in elections where Farage was defeated?
HYUFD was implying that the Brexit party had been swindled. This is something that Nigel Farage has suggested on many occasions but as far as I am aware he has a 100% of all fart and no follow through.
On this occasion it’s not actually Farage suggesting it, it’s the Conservatives, Anne Marie Waters & a group called ‘Democracy Volunteers’. Farage has commented on the allegations. I don’t think it was he who complained in Thanet South either. When did he?
I tell you what, I’ll do a whole thread header on the subject of Nigel Farage bad loser when I get a spare moment and I’m home. There are some wider points to be made about delegitimising the system and the damage that populism does to civic structures.
Iraq has WMD The banks are safe Nothing is happening in Rotherham Nothing is wrong at Stafford hospital Elections in Tower Hamlets are fair Kids Company is a deserving charity The government is "paying down Britain's debts" and has "halved the bill" Annual migration from Eastern Europe will be five to ten thousand Net immigration will be reduced to the tens of thousands A Leave win will be followed by an immediate year long recession The accounts of X provide a true and fair view
I'm sure I've forgotten many others.
Perhaps the system has delegitmised itself.
Those are the causes of the damage done to civic structures, Farage is merely a consequence.
While I have no doubt about the headline’s thrust (politically motivated), I think Fraser’s being a touch harsh here. The right to privacy is somewhat weakened if you scream so loudly it can be heard outside your property, IMO.
While I have no doubt about the headline’s thrust (politically motivated), I think Fraser’s being a touch harsh here. The right to privacy is somewhat weakened if you scream so loudly it can be heard outside your property, IMO.
Indeed. I’d say recording it is the right thing to do. If it is serious it could be used in a subsequent court case. The problem here is that we all now want to hear the tape. Should it be released to prove it exists? I don’t know.
While I have no doubt about the headline’s thrust (politically motivated), I think Fraser’s being a touch harsh here. The right to privacy is somewhat weakened if you scream so loudly it can be heard outside your property, IMO.
On Nelson's 'reasoning' the photo of Saatchi grabbing Nigella by the throat should never have been published. Which is odd considering that the Spectator wanted to set up a fight over it.
Why are there no privacy issues? Because he wants the power to rule over you. The Brexit movement can't demand Queensberry rules of politics out of one side of its face, and scream "death to traitors" out of the other.
Some inconvenient facts diehard Remainers need to face.
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
I hate to break it to you HUFFD but the polls might be wrong or change dramatically in the weeks to come. How many times did you you assure that the Brexit Party was going to walk Peterborough?
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
The Brexit Party were just 600 votes behind in Peterborough with the Tory vote up after May went, the Tories and Brexit Party combined were well over 50%.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
Yes, Labour won.
Is there an election that UKIP or the BXP ever met or beat their pre-election polling?
As I recall the Europolling was for BXP to be 35-40%, until the actual vote.
The range was 27-38%. BXP exactly matched the average, 32%.
The average was 33.25; they got 31.6
Con - Average 11.75; achieved 9.1 (underperformed by 2.65) Lab - Average 19.25; achieved 14.1 (underperformed by 5.15) LD - Average 16.13; achieved 20.3 (overperformed by 4.17) Green - Average 8.25; achieved 12.1 (overperformed by 3.85) Brexit - Average 33.25; achieved 31.6 (underperformed by 1.65)
They did indeed underperform, if not be a considerable amount.
While I have no doubt about the headline’s thrust (politically motivated), I think Fraser’s being a touch harsh here. The right to privacy is somewhat weakened if you scream so loudly it can be heard outside your property, IMO.
Indeed. I’d say recording it is the right thing to do. If it is serious it could be used in a subsequent court case. The problem here is that we all now want to hear the tape. Should it be released to prove it exists? I don’t know.
A friend (yes, really) had trouble with a very inconsiderate, noisy neighbour. The council noise abatement officer asked them to keep a diary of the noise and, if possible, record examples.
Comments
As Yougov showed yesterday if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by October 31st and we have left the EU by then then either a Boris led Tory Party or a Hunt led Tories will win an overall majority (or on a platform to leave by October 31st) and we move towards a FTA for GB and likely still the backstop for Northern Ireland ultimately maybe with a confirmatory referendum.
If we have not left the EU by October 31st then as Yougov also showed Farage and the Brexit Party would either win an overall Commons majority at the next general election with a Hunt led Tories falling to just 17 seats or the Brexit Party would be largest party in the Commons against a Boris led Tory Party on a Brexit with No Deal platform.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/06/21/delivering-brexit-will-do-more-boost-conservative-
The House of Commons will not permit No Deal. If it comes to it, they will vote down the Government.
In terms of the EU, the moment they see a VONC succeed they will extend Article 50. They will then await the result of a General Election.
I remember some months ago being assured on here many times that Parliament couldn't prevent No Deal. I told you then this was nonsense. It remains nonsense.
That won't stop the likes of HUYFD living in their fantasy world. Speaking of which, does Bill Cash still think we left the EU on March 31st?!
Axiom 11 seems quite sound to me. It is unknowable.
The lengthy list leaves out a central issue: assuming Boris wins can he get to the starting gate of forming a stable government and winning an early VONC? I think there must be a bit of doubt. The DUP are not reliable, and he would only need a small number of implacable foes on his own side to be defeated. Could this become an issue in the campaign between Hunt and Boris?
https://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-commons-faqs/business-faq-page/recess-dates/
This means MPs will not be able to no-confidence the new Prime Minister, Boris, Hunt or Corbyn, and will have limited time to block no-deal Brexit (assuming either Boris or Hunt really wants that, which is open to doubt).
Yours is exactly the type of tunnel vision that led the Tories to believe in 2017 that all they had to do was call an election and their 20% poll lead would be magically transformed into a 3 figure majority. How did that work out?
If the Commons refuses to respect the Leave vote then as Yougov showed yesterday Leavers will elect a new Commons that will whether that requires PM Boris or PM Farage they do not care, they will not rest and they will not stop until they get the Brexit they voted for
Likewise nobody will vote for a Boris de Pfiffel-led Tory Party.
Your hopes lies in shatters, Mr HY.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/06/21/delivering-brexit-will-do-more-boost-conservative-
1. The Brexit Party had a pretty good candidate, and it was excellent timing. They didn't do it. The Brexit Party will not get (m)any MPS in a GE.
2. Jazza's fudge tasted fine. Corbyn played it right, whereas Starmer would have lost Posh.
By Afghanistan.
The Brexit Party won a landslide in the European Parliament elections.
You have declared war on Leavers and Leavers are about to declare war back.
Boris or Farage will be their commanding officer, prepare for war!
5th September to October 15th is six weeks. More than ample time for a Vote of No Confidence.
We had all this guff before about Parliament 'not being able to prevent No Deal / Brexit blah blah.'
They did. And they will.
Precisely.
Plus the police are now investigating fraud in Peterborough
They had a lot of breaks -- great timing, and a pretty plausible local candidate in a Leave voting seat where the previous MP was hauled off to jail.
They didn't do it, even when they had all the breaks. They didn't do it.
There are not going to be 100 Brexit Party MPs after the GE. There are not going to be 10. I'll be surprised if there is even 1.
Is there an election that UKIP or the BXP ever met or beat their pre-election polling?
As I recall the Europolling was for BXP to be 35-40%, until the actual vote.
Let's simplify things. Start from the position that EU negotiating elite have no intention of making any concessions before the UK leaves. Their goal has all along been to keep the UK in the EU while offering next to nothing, and the outcome they want to avoid is the UK leaving without a deal. They realise that in a month's time the UK will at last have a PM willing to take the UK out of the EU before a deal is reached, but they think too that there is not a majority in parliament that will allow the PM to do that. So the EU think, probably correctly, that if they double down and continue to offer nothing worth having then the UK will continue in the EU after 31st October.
The consequences of that outcome:
1. The Government would clearly be a lame duck government without a secure working majority. Johnson would be best advised to look to the long term and call an immediate general election on the explicit grounds of delivering a majority capable of delivering Brexit. Let's assume he does so. If so...
2a. The more likely outcome is that the Conservatives would lose seats, opening the way to a Remainer coalition of Labour and Lib Dems which would revoke A50. However, the Conservative Party would not implode and the result would still see off the Brexit Party. That is, Johnson would have been seen to do his best to deliver a Brexit worthy of the name and most Leave voters would recognise that. (The latest YouGov polling is of no value here, because the polling question fails to recognise that scenario.) Furthermore the Conservatives would stay committed to fighting the subsequent GE on a platform to take the UK out of the EU. With the potential for the minority government of Remain parties to be short lived, that election might not be too long coming, bringing with it the prospect of a Conservative government with a sufficient majority to deliver UK withdrawal early in the next decade.
2b. The less likely outcome is that the Conservatives would secure a working parliamentary majority for Leave on a reduced vote share. If so, we will be out by the New Year.
Both of those alternative outcomes (2a and 2b) undermine the premise of the EU's negotiating tactic, namely that there is a parliamentary majority sufficient to prevent the UK leaving without a prior trade agreement being in place. So the final consequence is that:
3. Once a parliamentary majority for Leave is secure, and with a PM willing to pursue "No-Deal" if necessary, the EU will return to the negotiating table. It will this time start with a goal of trying to secure a long term agreement of benefit both the EU and UK, rather than the political goal of trying to avoid the UK leaving.
Best get back in that garden though, Mrs Foxy giving me the beady eye for lingering over lunch.
1. Embellish the existing WA with smoke and mirrors, just as you say. Lots of lovely promises in the political declaration. Fierce proclamations. Disparaging personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. The EU perceives the same old WA through the smoke, rolls its eyes and lets him try.
2. If Parliament passes it, fine. Onwards! Upwards!
3. If Parliament votes it down, call an election. "Enough is enough", "let's get it done", "speak for Britain", etc etc. Boris will gamble that he can win by force of personality. Deselect anyone who dissents, call them something like "nasty nitpicking nonentities". Take on Farage and Corbyn in debate, and deploy bluster.
4. If he wins, fabulous for him. If he loses, oh well, it was fun anyway.
“Tory party employee Marion Little, 63, was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of two charges.
Little, who had effectively run the 2015 election campaign, was found guilty of two counts of encouraging or assisting an offence, but cleared of a third.
Handing her a nine-month sentence, suspended for two years, the judge said Little had been "carried away by her conviction" that defeating Mr Farage was an "overwhelmingly important political objective".
He said the only reason she was not being given a custodial sentence was because she was caring for her husband, who is terminally ill.“
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-46749743
Overall there's very little to be impressed about from any of the parties.
You must have be his neighbour with the powerful wire-tapping, recording and surveillance equipment !!
Or is the assumption that Johnson is lying about the deadline, and that Macron and others are misleading us about the chances of an extension?
I can't see how the Conservatives will tolerate any more drifting along.
https://twitter.com/andrew_lilico/status/1142399647165685761
He's a complete weirdo, isn't he.
The facts are YoiuGov had
Brex 23%, Lib Dem 21%, Lab 20%, Con 20% (18-19 June)
On those it could just as well (and probably more likely be) PM Corbyn or PM Swinson (or Davey).
The Brexit they voted for was a 52:48 Brexit, indicating a soft as possible Brexit - and since then they have deprived the Brexit pursuing Tories of their majority and swung against Brexit (according to the polls).
No one at Westminster cares, no one in the country cares (except you I guess). It will shift precisely zero votes.
If you want to be effective, suggest you find a new line of attack
Their on-topic date of Brexit market goes 6/4 2019, and 1/2 not before 2020.
Your response to a general election result you don’t like is to encourage arson and revolution?
Is that official party policy?
Is that really the best you can come up. None of that explains why your prediction was so completely and utterly wrong.
Unionist politicians do, but a significant number of Unionist voters are not as absolute.
A view sometimes echoed by the PB LibDems.
What then? The WA will not get through even with smoke and mirrors (DUP/ERG).
So a GE where anything could happen.
Success for TBP may mean a No Deal Brexit.
Success for the LibDems may mean Revoke.
In both cases in conjunction with one of what we used to call 'the two main parties'.
It is rather odd that a party that claims to be about ensuring democracy is a lifetime dictatorship.
Was not Keynes but C P Scott of The Manchester Guardian
Here are some more facts.
1. Ireland do not want No Deal.
2. The EU do not want No Deal.
3. The sole purpose of the backstop is to prevent a potential future No Deal.
4. The EU don't believe the UK will go to No Deal at the moment.
Keynes famously said when the facts change, I change my mind. In order to change CycleFree's Fact 2, we need to change my Fact 4 (related to CycleFree's Facts 13 and 14).
Of course, that was quite a while ago. In fact, it was as distant in time to now as now is to a general election if the Tory winner calls one immediately and it goes through the House.
So why should the poll you cite be any closer to opinion then than the poll I cite is to opinion now? feel free to use both sides of the paper in your reply (or, more likely, to ignore the question as not fitting your worldview)
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1281548895347958
The banks are safe
Nothing is happening in Rotherham
Nothing is wrong at Stafford hospital
Elections in Tower Hamlets are fair
Kids Company is a deserving charity
The government is "paying down Britain's debts" and has "halved the bill"
Annual migration from Eastern Europe will be five to ten thousand
Net immigration will be reduced to the tens of thousands
A Leave win will be followed by an immediate year long recession
The accounts of X provide a true and fair view
I'm sure I've forgotten many others.
Perhaps the system has delegitmised itself.
Those are the causes of the damage done to civic structures, Farage is merely a consequence.
https://twitter.com/FraserNelson/status/1142433485359112193?s=20
After 10 overs India have already conceded 12.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/01/taki-step-outside-mr-saatchi/
Con - Average 11.75; achieved 9.1 (underperformed by 2.65)
Lab - Average 19.25; achieved 14.1 (underperformed by 5.15)
LD - Average 16.13; achieved 20.3 (overperformed by 4.17)
Green - Average 8.25; achieved 12.1 (overperformed by 3.85)
Brexit - Average 33.25; achieved 31.6 (underperformed by 1.65)
They did indeed underperform, if not be a considerable amount.
You can even get apps for it.
https://www.thenoiseapp.com/#/
It might just be that this neighbour had had problems before the happy couple moved in.