politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Boost for beleaguered TMay as the Tories hold second place in
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Boost for beleaguered TMay as the Tories hold second place in Newport W with swing from LAB to CON
Newport West Result:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
What I see from this result is that when given a free hit, leavers are willing to dump Lab/Con and lend UKIP a protest vote. Even though UKIP are barely a party any more.
If we do end up participating in euro elections later this year this result will inform my betting.
I voted leave but I take no joy in seeing the UKIP share of vote rise while lab/con fall.
https://twitter.com/gsoh31/status/1113962288707448838
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1113976005012664321
Perhaps Neil Hamilton isn't sure!
Didn't realise the new Renew party was allied with Mrs Merkel and Mr Juncker! Perhaps the Lib Dems stopped them joning with the Liberals.
With respect to the by-election, I'd tend to agree that it isn't very revealing. Labour will be satisfied to have held, the Tories will be satisfied that their vote share has not gone completely down the loo (and, indeed, has held up a bit better than Labour's,) but that's about it.
Not a surprise there. But there will be plenty of MPs uneasy about their job security this morning, if we are headed for an early election. Time to finally pass May's Shit Deal?
https://twitter.com/MKarnitschnig/status/1113760351299018752
Part of it may be Flynn's personal vote share unwinding. People who would have voted for him probably saw no reason to vote for Labour at this moment.
But it's still a poor result for Labour.
It's funny that Corbyn, who whatever his many faults is undoubtedly a superb campaigner and street pounder, simply can't get by-elections right. Copeland was of course the most disastrous but Stoke and now Newport are showing that Labour are simply no good at them.
UKIP share only just over half what they got in 2015. Boosts for various anti-Brexit parties. Low turnout. No real enthusiasm for the larger parties but otherwise little to see here.
Another MP for the side of sanity in parliament, hopefully.
Mr. B2, after yesterday, there's never been a clearer indication of which MPs really are wet.
I blame Brexit, Corbyn and all these unicorns you see everywhere on the site.
(While I know what you meant, I don't think there is a sane side in Parliament right now.)
The U.K. plays a key role in Operation Althea, the European Union's peacekeeping mission based in Sarajevo, but might have to withdraw abruptly from the deployment in case of a no-deal departure....
The U.K. currently provides "most of the capabilities" in terms of military force and intelligence, a third diplomat said.
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-warns-of-brexit-implications-on-peacekeeping-mission-in-bosnia/
It’s worth remembering that in most Leave constituencies most Remain voters were Labour voters. It doesn’t take many of those Remain voters to feel betrayed and to switch for Labour to be in all kinds of trouble.
That over 6,000 voters turned out for UKIP in 2015 yet only 2,000 last night suggests the size of the angry army has been overestimated. Farage's tiny March and rally suggest the same.
"As usual, by-elections don’t tell us a huge amount about the bigger political picture, but are very important in setting the political narrative.
By-elections are very unusual beasts. Because they don’t decide who will form the government for the next five years, only who will be the local MP, people are comparatively free to use them to register a protest. They are much more fiercely contested than your average seat at a general election. The constituency itself will also normally have its own local ideosyncracities that mean it can’t just be read as if it is a microcosm of Britain as a whole. So when people ask me what by-elections tell us, I normally say not much: if the change in the vote is in line with what the national polls are showing then it tells us nothing we didn’t already know, if the change is different to the national polls it’s probably just because by-elections are very different to general elections."
This was after the Stoke and Copeland Byelections in 2015
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9811
Might that explain your misused apostrophe ?
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi-bin/seatdetails.py?seat=Newport West
Newport West/Wales/GB
Economic Position 5° Left 9° Left 0°
National Position 1° Nat 0° 0°
EU Leave % 53% 52% 52%
British Identity 31% 26% 29%
Good Health 46% 47% 48%
UK Born 92% 95% 88%
Good Education 38% 36% 39%
Good Job 52% 46% 51%
High SEC 50% 46% 51%
Average Age 48.9 49.6 48.5
ABC1 Class 52% 47% 53%
Utter vindication for Mrs May and her strategy on Brexit.
https://www.thenational.scot/news/17552156.sturgeon-no-sign-of-may-compromising-on-brexit-deal/
And on that sentence, I have a last day to get to. Have a good day, everyone!
12 month flextension, probably good but is a terribble neoligism.
five seconds later :
"I am in favour of leaving under WTO rules"
sorry, but if we have to follow WTO rules we are not a free country.
I guess under his definition the only "free country" in the world is North Korea
* Not Brexit related but JFDI.
12 months with Euro elections, and new party leaders, October GE.
It depends who replaces May. If we get a long extension May should acknowledge she's failed and go.
The danger in a longer delay is business has more time to plan moving to Europe
In the EU and Customs Union are national rules and obligations are set internationally.
Is 37% a low turnout for a by-election?
Is UKIP back in operation? I suspect it needs a definitive 'No' to Brexit before it will make much progress. With this Schrodinger version, it's still all up in the air, although delay can only help Brexit-fatigue.
Business has had 3 years to plan moving to Europe if it wanted to.
While I'd prefer we were rid of Northern Ireland I only want them to leave if that is their choice, which they've not made. If the Republic and the EU won't come up with an equitable free trade deal without a backstop then we should leave anyway and have a border within Ireland. Its entirely manageable as Varadkar has already made clear.
Edit/ This surely makes a PV more likely, as a way to cement the extension?
EU/Customs Union rules are national affecting the nations it applies to.
Under the WTO we would be a free nation setting our own national laws within the established international order.
In the EU/CU some of our national rules will be set by the EU. In the latter case without us even getting a say.