Windrush hasn't seen either party covered in glory. It affects very few voters directly. Labour supporters would no doubt suggest that callous Tories don't give a shiny shit anyway - so the most excited about it are likely to be on the Left. (Personally, I think the Tories should have sorted this before it became a political football, and Amber Rudd has lost what little lustre remained.)
More importantly, Labour look to be losing those who didn't mind voting for Corbyn when doing so was a free kick at Bishop Brennan's arse, but are decidedly squeamish once he might actually, you know, get to be PM....
Makes the locals interesting, PVs are going out now.
If the LDs can't gain any traction in these circumstances (and this poll does not look good from their point of view), there really is no hope for them. Fwiw, they probably have my vote in Ealing for want of alternatives.
So they say. But if they vote Labour, they're voting for Corbyn as PM.
I still wonder at what point Mr. Observer will (if he doesn't succeed in ousting Corbyn) give up. Because right now, any effort to help Labour is helping Corbyn into Number Ten.
Land of hope and Tories. As someone with a biggish mortgage who would prefer an economically dry version of the yellow team in charge, I definitely prefer the blue team to be ahead of the reds.
Windrush hasn't seen either party covered in glory. It affects very few voters directly. Labour supporters would no doubt suggest that callous Tories don't give a shiny shit anyway - so the most excited about it are likely to be on the Left. (Personally, I think the Tories should have sorted this before it became a political football, and Amber Rudd has lost what little lustre remained.)
More importantly, Labour look to be losing those who didn't mind voting for Corbyn when doing so was a free kick at Bishop Brennan's arse, but are decidedly squeamish once he might actually, you know, get to be PM....
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
I don’t think this about the voters getting squeasmish ‘once he might actually get to be PM.’ Corbyn had crap ratings when Labour was twenty five points behind. The polls at the GE oversaw a reduction the Tory lead and thus the increasing prospect of Corbyn becoming PM, yet that didn’t lead to Corbyn’s ratings crashing and burning. The GE campaign was actually one of the few occasions which saw Corbyn’s ratings rise.
The last few months (especially this last month) has highlighted Corbyn’s weaknesses, while May was having a good month until the Windrush scandal. I think that’s the reason for Corbyn’s declining ratings. But in this climate we’ve seen that ratings can change very quickly, so we have to see how Corbyn’s Labour handles things from here.
Remember, Corbyn wouldn't have a prayer were it not for the fact that the Tories have so alienated so many with their policies on housing, tuition fees and Brexit. He is in these respects very much their creation.
Britain’s hopes of building a deep security partnership with the EU have been cast into fresh doubt after Brussels issued a warning to EU member states that the British government cannot be trusted to handle sensitive crime data, the Telegraph can reveal.
Remember, Corbyn wouldn't have a prayer were it not for the fact that the Tories have so alienated so many with their policies on housing, tuition fees and Brexit. He is in these respects very much their creation.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Britain’s hopes of building a deep security partnership with the EU have been cast into fresh doubt after Brussels issued a warning to EU member states that the British government cannot be trusted to handle sensitive crime data, the Telegraph can reveal.
This is about moving hi tech work to the EU, in particular France, from the UK.
So, in 2015 after the terrorists attacked the Bataclan theatre in Paris, where did the intelligence come from to apprehend the perpetrators? Oh, it was the British. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42875215
At least Sanchez has turned up against Spurs. As an Arsenal fan I really wouldn’t like to see them get to the FA Cup final.
I want Spurs to win. It would be nice to keep the record for more than a season this time and if Spurs do win the Cup it will always have an asterisk next to it due to home advantage.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
That’s one poll though. Most of the polls on average have been showing a tie, and that was before the antisemitism scandal. When we got polling a week after the scandal broke, it pretty much showed the polls hadn’t budged. To repeat what I said yesterday, I don’t think Windrush will really have much impact on the polls either.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
A government eight years in... I’m wondering if it’s just afterglow from the general election that has kept th4 cons so high. Opposition parties heading for government often have some pretty insane poll leads. Even ones that only might just get into government get sustained leads.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
Sub exhibit A(i): a party partisan taking a single poll as evidence of an established & solid lead.
Polling is just a load of rot. They were giving Theresa a 300-seat majority a few weeks prior and look what happened. In any other walk of life they would be branded pseudo-science and left to cranks. The polling companies should just disband and give us all some peace.
At least Sanchez has turned up against Spurs. As an Arsenal fan I really wouldn’t like to see them get to the FA Cup final.
I want Spurs to win. It would be nice to keep the record for more than a season this time and if Spurs do win the Cup it will always have an asterisk next to it due to home advantage.
I forgot about the record. I still can’t find it in me to be support Spurs to keep the record though, sorry.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
Sub exhibit A(i): a party partisan taking a single poll as evidence of an established & solid lead.
Mr. Dawning, to be fair, they did change after May launched the most stupid campaigning approach since Flaminius thought chasing Hannibal would be a good idea.
Remember, Corbyn wouldn't have a prayer were it not for the fact that the Tories have so alienated so many with their policies on housing, tuition fees and Brexit. He is in these respects very much their creation.
Corbyn became Labour leader the year before the Referendum and Labour led the Conservatives in the 2016 local elections.
Now Brexit may or may not have alienated some previous Conservative voters but on the other hand it may or may not have resulted in them gaining new supporters and without Brexit it would certainly have seen them losing supporters to UKIP.
You're certainly right about the effects of housing and tuition fees but they have nothing to do with Brexit and everything to do with Remainers such as Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Osborne.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
That’s one poll though. Most of the polls on average have been showing a tie, and that was before the antisemitism scandal. When we got polling a week after the scandal broke, it pretty much showed the polls hadn’t budged. To repeat what I said yesterday, I don’t think Windrush will really have much impact on the polls either.
Also it’s not mid-term.
Depends when Theresa calls the next one. We know she likes elections.
And Corbyn would HAVE to go along with calling it.....
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
Sub exhibit A(i): a party partisan taking a single poll as evidence of an established & solid lead.
Exhibit B Tory lead of 9% eve of poll GE2017 100 seat majority in bag.
9.59 Tories await Exit Poll to see how big their majority has increased to.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
That’s one poll though. Most of the polls on average have been showing a tie, and that was before the antisemitism scandal. When we got polling a week after the scandal broke, it pretty much showed the polls hadn’t budged. To repeat what I said yesterday, I don’t think Windrush will really have much impact on the polls either.
Also it’s not mid-term.
Depends when Theresa calls the next one. We know she likes elections.
And Corbyn would HAVE to go along with calling it.....
Tbh I don’t think TMay likes elections now all that much.
I also don’t think the Conservative party are going to allow themselves to be led into another GE by TMay.
I don’t think anyone is ‘excited’ about this scandal. Antisemitism also affects few voters directly but IIRC you were convinced it was disastrous for Labour electorally.
Exhibit A: a Govt. mid-term 5% poll lead.....
That’s one poll though. Most of the polls on average have been showing a tie, and that was before the antisemitism scandal. When we got polling a week after the scandal broke, it pretty much showed the polls hadn’t budged. To repeat what I said yesterday, I don’t think Windrush will really have much impact on the polls either.
Also it’s not mid-term.
Depends when Theresa calls the next one. We know she likes elections.
And Corbyn would HAVE to go along with calling it.....
Tbh I don’t think TMay likes elections now all that much.
I also don’t think the Conservative party are going to allow themselves to be led into another GE by TMay.
Theresa May “got away” with calling the last election. I can’t remember what excuse she gave but I think the general consensus was that it was not a bad idea to get a personal mandate and a better majority.
Unfortunately, she flubbed it.
The public do not have the appetite for another snap election, nor do the Conservative party, and nor does Mrs May.
Until then, polling is really of academic interest. It merely tells us Corbyn cannot win the next election, all things being equal.
Carwyn resigned as FM. Early days for runners and riders but Eluded Morgan and Mark Drake ford already mentioned. Ps electiral college system for deputy has caused row. Members voted Julie Morgan, but Carolyn Harris gets the gig.
I'm trying to think of a more staggeringly stupid policy.
1. If you force coal up the merit order (irrespective of underlying cost of generation), then you will increase electricity prices for American businesses and consumers.
2. By reducing demand for natural gas, you will reduce the amount of activity in the space. And natural gas employment - even ignoring services firms - is much larger than that of the coal industry.
3. Natural gas is simply a better way to generate electricity: it has lower capital and maintenance costs, it's much more flexible, modern plants have efficiencies almost twice that of coal plants, and it produces far fewer pollutants than coal.
Remember, Corbyn wouldn't have a prayer were it not for the fact that the Tories have so alienated so many with their policies on housing, tuition fees and Brexit. He is in these respects very much their creation.
Corbyn became Labour leader the year before the Referendum and Labour led the Conservatives in the 2016 local elections.
Now Brexit may or may not have alienated some previous Conservative voters but on the other hand it may or may not have resulted in them gaining new supporters and without Brexit it would certainly have seen them losing supporters to UKIP.
You're certainly right about the effects of housing and tuition fees but they have nothing to do with Brexit and everything to do with Remainers such as Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Osborne.
Corbyn's fellow travellers were electoral poison in the 1980s and 1990s. In those days many voters who were young and/or working class could see (grudgingly) that they had a stake in the economic stability and opportunity for personal advancement that the Tories appeared to offer them, so given a choice between a Trot and a Tory they would tend to opt for the latter.
Carwyn resigned as FM. Early days for runners and riders but Eluded Morgan and Mark Drake ford already mentioned. Ps electiral college system for deputy has caused row. Members voted Julie Morgan, but Carolyn Harris gets the gig.
Today’s news has reminded me that the Lib Dems hold the Education portfolio in the Welsh government.
Is Wales a testbed, then, for radical centrism in its horribly underperforming schools?
Makes the locals interesting, PVs are going out now.
If the LDs can't gain any traction in these circumstances (and this poll does not look good from their point of view), there really is no hope for them. Fwiw, they probably have my vote in Ealing for want of alternatives.
The Ealing LDs are worth supporting against the alternatives.
The outlook for the LDs in London looks positive only where Labour doesn't make a showing, in SW London against the Tories. Against Labour in the central Boroughs and in three-way contests in outer NW, NE and SE, things look difficult. However if Labour falters and the Tories do better - as most recent polls suggest - the LDs have a better chance of hanging on in Boroughs like Haringey and Southwark.
Makes the locals interesting, PVs are going out now.
If the LDs can't gain any traction in these circumstances (and this poll does not look good from their point of view), there really is no hope for them. Fwiw, they probably have my vote in Ealing for want of alternatives.
The Ealing LDs are worth supporting against the alternatives.
The outlook for the LDs in London looks positive only where Labour doesn't make a showing, in SW London against the Tories. Against Labour in the central Boroughs and in three-way contests in outer NW, NE and SE, things look difficult. However if Labour falters and the Tories do better - as most recent polls suggest - the LDs have a better chance of hanging on in Boroughs like Haringey and Southwark.
Yes, think I'll give them my vote, and try and persuade Mrs N to do the same. They've suffered enough.
Interesting ComRes poll coming out at 8pm with questions on how Corbyn is tackling antisemitism and whether voters would trust him to lead the country. No VI
I'm having dinner with Sean Fear tonight and will cover it and other polling when I return.
Interesting ComRes poll coming out at 8pm with questions on how Corbyn is tackling antisemitism and whether voters would trust him to lead the country. No VI
I'm having dinner with Sean Fear tonight and will cover it and other polling when I return.
I look forward to your coverage of your dinner with Sean Fear.
If you were having dinner with SeanT you could allow him to cover it.
Remember, Corbyn wouldn't have a prayer were it not for the fact that the Tories have so alienated so many with their policies on housing, tuition fees and Brexit. He is in these respects very much their creation.
Corbyn became Labour leader the year before the Referendum and Labour led the Conservatives in the 2016 local elections.
Now Brexit may or may not have alienated some previous Conservative voters but on the other hand it may or may not have resulted in them gaining new supporters and without Brexit it would certainly have seen them losing supporters to UKIP.
You're certainly right about the effects of housing and tuition fees but they have nothing to do with Brexit and everything to do with Remainers such as Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Osborne.
Corbyn's fellow travellers were electoral poison in the 1980s and 1990s. In those days many voters who were young and/or working class could see (grudgingly) that they had a stake in the economic stability and opportunity for personal advancement that the Tories appeared to offer them, so given a choice between a Trot and a Tory they would tend to opt for the latter.
The 1980s and 1990s were a time of rising prosperity and rising home ownership (especially among the young).
They were also a time of free university education and low personal debt.
And when Britain seemed to have both reasonable levels of aspiration and fairness.
How has home ownership levels changed between middle and working class people over the last few decades ?
Traditionally the middle classes would have higher levels of home ownership with an increase in working class home ownership levels in the 1980s (RTB etc).
But I wonder if the fall in home ownership during the last 15 years has been concentrated among the middle classes with them coming into the workforce later, having student debts, more likely to go travelling, more likely to move to urban areas etc.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Not evaporating - going into stasis, more like. It will return, as needed. Campaigning during election season is what he is made for, and people are much more likely to overlook his faults at such a time.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
So you can't think of anything.
And the idea that London only became 'de facto cultural capital of Europe' after 1997 is comical.
I’m not here to compile lists of great British creative achievements.
And indeed, since you appear to be a philistine and a halfwit, it would be wasted on you anyway.
I am here to point out the value of creative exports (according to that article) nearly rank with the budget of the whole NHS. You seem to disregard that in your sneering troglodytism.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Interesting ComRes poll coming out at 8pm with questions on how Corbyn is tackling antisemitism and whether voters would trust him to lead the country. No VI
I'm having dinner with Sean Fear tonight and will cover it and other polling when I return.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Oh, well I couldn't give a toss about special causes like the arts.
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Oh, well I couldn't give a toss about special causes like the arts.
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
I believe the right term is “unspoofable”.
You are literally blaming some guy for the predictable consequences of your own actions (presuming you voted Brexit).
"If you support the religiously motivated assassination of a politician, will the Labour party accept you as a member?
This may seem an absurd question to ask, especially of the party that lost Jo Cox to a fanatic"
"This a clear-cut case, right? Surely Labour would never let such a man on board.
Oh yes it would. Actually, it has. Here’s Corbynista vicar and Labour PPC for Cities of London and Westminster Steven Saxby fawning over Ul Hassan and welcoming his “friend”to the party. Saxby says the news is “marvellous” and that Mahmood is “very well-respected in the community”
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
So you can't think of anything.
And the idea that London only became 'de facto cultural capital of Europe' after 1997 is comical.
I’m not here to compile lists of great British creative achievements.
And indeed, since you appear to be a philistine and a halfwit, it would be wasted on you anyway.
I am here to point out the value of creative exports (according to that article) nearly rank with the budget of the whole NHS. You seem to disregard that in your sneering troglodytism.
LOL
You so often stoop to shrill abuse when people ask inconvenient questions.
A tendency of people with closed minds in my experience.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Oh, well I couldn't give a toss about special causes like the arts.
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
I believe the right term is “unspoofable”.
You are literally blaming some guy for the predictable consequences of your own actions (presuming you voted Brexit).
No. I couldn't give a **** about his problems. Okay, that's not quite true, but I don't see why we should care about special cases.
What I'm saying is, perhaps those who do benefit from EU membership should not have taken it for granted. It's people like the author who reap all the benefits and everyone else shoulders the costs. Had Cameron got something substantial on migration, I think Remain would have won. But he didn't even try.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
So you can't think of anything.
And the idea that London only became 'de facto cultural capital of Europe' after 1997 is comical.
I’m not here to compile lists of great British creative achievements.
And indeed, since you appear to be a philistine and a halfwit, it would be wasted on you anyway.
I am here to point out the value of creative exports (according to that article) nearly rank with the budget of the whole NHS. You seem to disregard that in your sneering troglodytism.
LOL
You so often stoop to shrill abuse when people ask inconvenient questions.
A tendency of people with closed minds in my experience.
What *is* your inconvenient question? What are you trying to prove? That the Black and White Minstrel show was the apex of British civilisation?
I’m not sure *what* your point is. I suspect you don’t have one. You simply saw an opportunity to sneer at some old New Labour PR term “Cool Britannia”, presumably seeking warm approval from your fellow trogs.
Speaking of which what happened to 'Cool Britannia' - that cultural renaissance we were told would happen in 1997.
Well, it happened.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
You mean a lot of money was spent.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Oh, well I couldn't give a toss about special causes like the arts.
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
I believe the right term is “unspoofable”.
You are literally blaming some guy for the predictable consequences of your own actions (presuming you voted Brexit).
No. I couldn't give a **** about his problems. Okay, that's not quite true, but I don't see why we should care about special cases.
What I'm saying is, perhaps those who do benefit from EU membership should not have taken it for granted. It's people like the author who reap all the benefits and everyone else shoulders the costs. Had Cameron got something substantial on migration, I think Remain would have won. But he didn't even try.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This is turning out to be like the run in to the Customs Union change. Slow and salami sliced changes, then 6 months down the line, Corbyn will say so himself. Remember he was against Customs Union too!
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
I read the piece and it was another "oh, this is such a hassle" piece. Well, perhaps the author and others should have lobbied Cameron to get a better deal to keep us in.
Right, OK. It’s the Remainer’s fault. Yep.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
Oh, well I couldn't give a toss about special causes like the arts.
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
I believe the right term is “unspoofable”.
You are literally blaming some guy for the predictable consequences of your own actions (presuming you voted Brexit).
No. I couldn't give a **** about his problems. Okay, that's not quite true, but I don't see why we should care about special cases.
What I'm saying is, perhaps those who do benefit from EU membership should not have taken it for granted. It's people like the author who reap all the benefits and everyone else shoulders the costs. Had Cameron got something substantial on migration, I think Remain would have won. But he didn't even try.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
It’s pointless because your response to a well-argued piece on the impact of Brexit to the cultural sector sought to blame the writer rather than address any of the detail within.
It’s easy to mock the “arts”, forgetting presumably that it is a multi-billion export industry these days, and one in which the U.K. has excelled.
But, see also pharma, finance, aerospace, auto, higher education etc etc etc.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
It’s pointless because your response to a well-argued piece on the impact of Brexit to the cultural sector sought to blame the writer rather than address any of the detail within.
It’s easy to mock the “arts”, forgetting presumably that it is a multi-billion export industry these days, and one in which the U.K. has excelled.
But, see also pharma, finance, aerospace, auto, higher education etc etc etc.
There are two questions:
1) Will the benefits of leaving the EU outweigh the costs? 2) Will the costs and benefits be distributed evenly?
The answer to 1) has been debated on here at length. The answer to 2) is almost certainly no. That, however, is always the case with any political and economic decision. Whilst I think it's a shame that other European states are now making things harder for British musicians, perhaps the author should think about what joining the EEC did to industries such as fishing.
What really fucks me off is the sense of entitlement of certain groups in this country.
Does anyone pay the slightest bit of attention to midterm polling anymore? Whether good or bad, the best advice is to ignore it.
But they do build narratives, which can strengthen or destabilise leaders.
For instance if TM was polling much worse at the start of the year, I have no doubt she'd have faced a challenge by now.
Luckily the Labour leader is mostly shielded from such narratives but it gives us some idea of what might be going on. Unless this causes people to switch their vote come election time when presumably Corbyn will be running another good campaign I imagine it will mostly be ignored in Labour circles.
Off Topic Happy with United today, more effective than brilliant but it'll do.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
It’s pointless because your response to a well-argued piece on the impact of Brexit to the cultural sector sought to blame the writer rather than address any of the detail within.
It’s easy to mock the “arts”, forgetting presumably that it is a multi-billion export industry these days, and one in which the U.K. has excelled.
But, see also pharma, finance, aerospace, auto, higher education etc etc etc.
There are two questions:
1) Will the benefits of leaving the EU outweigh the costs? 2) Will the costs and benefits be distributed evenly?
The answer to 1) has been debated on here at length. The answer to 2) is almost certainly no. That, however, is always the case with any political and economic decision. Whilst I think it's a shame that other European states are now making things harder for British musicians, perhaps the author should think about what joining the EEC did to industries such as fishing.
What really fucks me off is the sense of entitlement of certain groups in this country.
If you read the article, it was written in response to blithe dismissal of any issues caused by Brexit by Nadine Dorries.
It’s not clear to me why he should be criticised for sticking to his subject rather than extending to a broad essay on the EU and British industry since the 70s.
As for the sense of entitlement, I don’t really detect that at all. Simply a lament for the baleful consequences of Brexit on his livelihood, on British export earnings, and on cultural life in this country.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
No doubt they’ll be analysing SeanT’s work in the University of Alpha Centauri.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
So you can't think of anything.
And the idea that London only became 'de facto cultural capital of Europe' after 1997 is comical.
I’m not here to compile lists of great British creative achievements.
And indeed, since you appear to be a philistine and a halfwit, it would be wasted on you anyway.
I am here to point out the value of creative exports (according to that article) nearly rank with the budget of the whole NHS. You seem to disregard that in your sneering troglodytism.
LOL
You so often stoop to shrill abuse when people ask inconvenient questions.
A tendency of people with closed minds in my experience.
What *is* your inconvenient question? What are you trying to prove? That the Black and White Minstrel show was the apex of British civilisation?
I’m not sure *what* your point is. I suspect you don’t have one. You simply saw an opportunity to sneer at some old New Labour PR term “Cool Britannia”, presumably seeking warm approval from your fellow trogs.
Not really relevant to 2018, is it?
I wasn't making a point or trying to prove anything I asked two questions namely what happened to 'Cool Britannia' and what great achievments did it produce.
Yet within a couple of replies you were into 'philistine', 'halfwit' and now 'trogs'.
I would have hoped that anyone raising an issue would be willing to discuss it in a civilised manner and be open to new thoughts relating to it.
Are you ?
So if you wish we could discuss art or music or literature of recent years and how it has changed. Or indeed seeing that you mentioned the Black and White Minstrel Show how current television compares to that of the 1970s.
The 1970s gave us Elizabeth R, Secret Army, The Onedin Line, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Grange Hill and various Plays For Today among the drama programs and Fawlty Towers, Porridge, Some Mothers Do 'Av 'Em, The Good Life, Rising Damp and Not The Nine O'Clock News among the comedy. Plus Minder which was a bit of both.
Whew! I've just managed to escape watching the rest of the Queen's B'day celebration on the tele, during which I was fortunate to have a classic Eric Frank Russell novel to read.
Does anyone here know about GDPR ? More like have a pretty good knowledge about it.
It has led to businesses paying money to consultants who have told them to send leaflets / emails to their employees, suppliers and customers outlining what they do with their data records.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
It’s pointless because your response to a well-argued piece on the impact of Brexit to the cultural sector sought to blame the writer rather than address any of the detail within.
It’s easy to mock the “arts”, forgetting presumably that it is a multi-billion export industry these days, and one in which the U.K. has excelled.
But, see also pharma, finance, aerospace, auto, higher education etc etc etc.
There are two questions:
1) Will the benefits of leaving the EU outweigh the costs? 2) Will the costs and benefits be distributed evenly?
The answer to 1) has been debated on here at length. The answer to 2) is almost certainly no. That, however, is always the case with any political and economic decision. Whilst I think it's a shame that other European states are now making things harder for British musicians, perhaps the author should think about what joining the EEC did to industries such as fishing.
What really fucks me off is the sense of entitlement of certain groups in this country.
UK fishing was screwed because they sold their fishing permits to the Spanish.Depletion of the fish stock and conservation efforts didn't help but those weren't the fault of the EU.
The whining of the Brexiteers really is something to behold.
Whew! I've just managed to escape watching the rest of the Queen's B'day celebration on the tele, during which I was fortunate to have a classic Eric Frank Russell novel to read.
Yes. Those dastardly, export earning composers and viola players have been milking the system for YEARS.
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
This really is a pointless argument. I don't think it will make much difference to our tax take. Ironically, as with the City, I seem to have a higher opinion of their abilities than they do themselves. But if the tax take does go down, I'm sure us Brexiteers will suffer.
It’s pointless because your response to a well-argued piece on the impact of Brexit to the cultural sector sought to blame the writer rather than address any of the detail within.
It’s easy to mock the “arts”, forgetting presumably that it is a multi-billion export industry these days, and one in which the U.K. has excelled.
But, see also pharma, finance, aerospace, auto, higher education etc etc etc.
There are two questions:
1) Will the benefits of leaving the EU outweigh the costs? 2) Will the costs and benefits be distributed evenly?
The answer to 1) has been debated on here at length. The answer to 2) is almost certainly no. That, however, is always the case with any political and economic decision. Whilst I think it's a shame that other European states are now making things harder for British musicians, perhaps the author should think about what joining the EEC did to industries such as fishing.
What really fucks me off is the sense of entitlement of certain groups in this country.
UK fishing was screwed because they sold their fishing permits to the Spanish.Depletion of the fish stock and conservation efforts didn't help but those weren't the fault of the EU.
The whining of the Brexiteers really is something to behold.
So does that mean we didn't actually lose out by not taking control of our waters in the transition? I thought we were told that it was a concession by us.
And the only whinging is coming from entitled twats like Goodall.
Comments
Makes the locals interesting, PVs are going out now.
More importantly, Labour look to be losing those who didn't mind voting for Corbyn when doing so was a free kick at Bishop Brennan's arse, but are decidedly squeamish once he might actually, you know, get to be PM....
SNP: 39%
Conservative: 30%
Labour: 15%
Lib Dem: 9%
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/ck1l2ze60y/TimesResults_180417_VI_Trackers.pdf
I still wonder at what point Mr. Observer will (if he doesn't succeed in ousting Corbyn) give up. Because right now, any effort to help Labour is helping Corbyn into Number Ten.
I don’t think this about the voters getting squeasmish ‘once he might actually get to be PM.’ Corbyn had crap ratings when Labour was twenty five points behind. The polls at the GE oversaw a reduction the Tory lead and thus the increasing prospect of Corbyn becoming PM, yet that didn’t lead to Corbyn’s ratings crashing and burning. The GE campaign was actually one of the few occasions which saw Corbyn’s ratings rise.
The last few months (especially this last month) has highlighted Corbyn’s weaknesses, while May was having a good month until the Windrush scandal. I think that’s the reason for Corbyn’s declining ratings. But in this climate we’ve seen that ratings can change very quickly, so we have to see how Corbyn’s Labour handles things from here.
We are where we are.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42875215
Also it’s not mid-term.
Now Brexit may or may not have alienated some previous Conservative voters but on the other hand it may or may not have resulted in them gaining new supporters and without Brexit it would certainly have seen them losing supporters to UKIP.
You're certainly right about the effects of housing and tuition fees but they have nothing to do with Brexit and everything to do with Remainers such as Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Osborne.
And Corbyn would HAVE to go along with calling it.....
9.59 Tories await Exit Poll to see how big their majority has increased to.
10.00 Cats kicked throughout Tory Land
I also don’t think the Conservative party are going to allow themselves to be led into another GE by TMay.
Unfortunately, she flubbed it.
The public do not have the appetite for another snap election, nor do the Conservative party, and nor does Mrs May.
Until then, polling is really of academic interest. It merely tells us Corbyn cannot win the next election, all things being equal.
https://twitter.com/andrew_lilico/status/987652541369503744
Ps electiral college system for deputy has caused row. Members voted Julie Morgan, but Carolyn Harris gets the gig.
I'm trying to think of a more staggeringly stupid policy.
1. If you force coal up the merit order (irrespective of underlying cost of generation), then you will increase electricity prices for American businesses and consumers.
2. By reducing demand for natural gas, you will reduce the amount of activity in the space. And natural gas employment - even ignoring services firms - is much larger than that of the coal industry.
3. Natural gas is simply a better way to generate electricity: it has lower capital and maintenance costs, it's much more flexible, modern plants have efficiencies almost twice that of coal plants, and it produces far fewer pollutants than coal.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-20/mcdonnell-says-labour-not-ruling-out-second-brexit-referendum
Is Wales a testbed, then, for radical centrism in its horribly underperforming schools?
Didn’t think so.
The outlook for the LDs in London looks positive only where Labour doesn't make a showing, in SW London against the Tories. Against Labour in the central Boroughs and in three-way contests in outer NW, NE and SE, things look difficult. However if Labour falters and the Tories do better - as most recent polls suggest - the LDs have a better chance of hanging on in Boroughs like Haringey and Southwark.
I'm having dinner with Sean Fear tonight and will cover it and other polling when I return.
If you were having dinner with SeanT you could allow him to cover it.
http://www.howardgoodall.co.uk/articles-press-etc/brexit-and-music-theme-and-variations
They were also a time of free university education and low personal debt.
And when Britain seemed to have both reasonable levels of aspiration and fairness.
How has home ownership levels changed between middle and working class people over the last few decades ?
Traditionally the middle classes would have higher levels of home ownership with an increase in working class home ownership levels in the 1980s (RTB etc).
But I wonder if the fall in home ownership during the last 15 years has been concentrated among the middle classes with them coming into the workforce later, having student debts, more likely to go travelling, more likely to move to urban areas etc.
They will continue to pretend to be on both sides as long as that attracts voters
With 64% possession Spurs managed 2 shots on target - do you ever wonder if attacking play isn't as good as its claimed to be.
British film, music, design, architecture, fashion etc exports have all grown massively in the past two decades.
Not least via the establishment of London as de facto cultural capital of Europe.
Perhaps you'd like to make a list of the great achievements which people will remember a century from now.
Yes, it’s made a lot of money. And taxes paid too, which is helpful when considering the cost of your round-the-clock incontinence service.
And the idea that London only became 'de facto cultural capital of Europe' after 1997 is comical.
And indeed, since you appear to be a philistine and a halfwit, it would be wasted on you anyway.
I am here to point out the value of creative exports (according to that article) nearly rank with the budget of the whole NHS. You seem to disregard that in your sneering troglodytism.
Are Leavers going through their own version of the Kubler Ross stages of grief, and if so what stage is this?
All I was saying is, people moaning about the consequences of Brexit should look at themselves and their own side. Cameron asked for very little and was never going to walk away. The author of that piece should have thought about this stuff before the referendum, not after.
You are literally blaming some guy for the predictable consequences of your own actions (presuming you voted Brexit).
http://hurryupharry.org/2018/04/21/is-supporting-assassination-a-red-line-for-labour/
"If you support the religiously motivated assassination of a politician, will the Labour party accept you as a member?
This may seem an absurd question to ask, especially of the party that lost Jo Cox to a fanatic"
"This a clear-cut case, right? Surely Labour would never let such a man on board.
Oh yes it would. Actually, it has. Here’s Corbynista vicar and Labour PPC for Cities of London and Westminster Steven Saxby fawning over Ul Hassan and welcoming his “friend”to the party. Saxby says the news is “marvellous” and that Mahmood is “very well-respected in the community”
Bloody hell Labour.....
You so often stoop to shrill abuse when people ask inconvenient questions.
A tendency of people with closed minds in my experience.
What I'm saying is, perhaps those who do benefit from EU membership should not have taken it for granted. It's people like the author who reap all the benefits and everyone else shoulders the costs. Had Cameron got something substantial on migration, I think Remain would have won. But he didn't even try.
I’m not sure *what* your point is.
I suspect you don’t have one. You simply saw an opportunity to sneer at some old New Labour PR term “Cool Britannia”, presumably seeking warm approval from your fellow trogs.
Not really relevant to 2018, is it?
Deport ‘em, I reckon. Those trombonists? They don’t like it up ‘em!
For instance if TM was polling much worse at the start of the year, I have no doubt she'd have faced a challenge by now.
1) Will the benefits of leaving the EU outweigh the costs?
2) Will the costs and benefits be distributed evenly?
The answer to 1) has been debated on here at length. The answer to 2) is almost certainly no. That, however, is always the case with any political and economic decision. Whilst I think it's a shame that other European states are now making things harder for British musicians, perhaps the author should think about what joining the EEC did to industries such as fishing.
What really fucks me off is the sense of entitlement of certain groups in this country.
Just to put him into context....
Off Topic Happy with United today, more effective than brilliant but it'll do.
It’s not clear to me why he should be criticised for sticking to his subject rather than extending to a broad essay on the EU and British industry since the 70s.
As for the sense of entitlement, I don’t really detect that at all. Simply a lament for the baleful consequences of Brexit on his livelihood, on British export earnings, and on cultural life in this country.
Yet within a couple of replies you were into 'philistine', 'halfwit' and now 'trogs'.
I would have hoped that anyone raising an issue would be willing to discuss it in a civilised manner and be open to new thoughts relating to it.
Are you ?
So if you wish we could discuss art or music or literature of recent years and how it has changed. Or indeed seeing that you mentioned the Black and White Minstrel Show how current television compares to that of the 1970s.
The 1970s gave us Elizabeth R, Secret Army, The Onedin Line, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Grange Hill and various Plays For Today among the drama programs and Fawlty Towers, Porridge, Some Mothers Do 'Av 'Em, The Good Life, Rising Damp and Not The Nine O'Clock News among the comedy. Plus Minder which was a bit of both.
Now how does the last decade compare to that ?
I've just managed to escape watching the rest of the Queen's B'day celebration on the tele, during which I was fortunate to have a classic Eric Frank Russell novel to read.
The whining of the Brexiteers really is something to behold.
And the only whinging is coming from entitled twats like Goodall.