politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » It is a mistake to assume that LAB leave voters feel as strongly about Brexit as CON ones
With Labour apparently shifting its position on Brexit a notch or two there’s been a lot of interest about what Labour voters think particularly those who supported Leave at the referendum.
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Really interesting. I would guess the higher Con acceptance of job loss mainly or at least substantially reflects a better degree of financial cushioning and/or a belief (despite the wording of the question) that their jobs are too important to be lost as a result of Brexit.
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Sater has reportedly turned supergrass.
Thanks Yokel. Your posts here are a must read.
+1
I'd love to know Yokel's background - if he could tell us, that is! He seems more on the ball than most.
Really interesting. I would guess the higher Con acceptance of job loss mainly or at least substantially reflects a better degree of financial cushioning and/or a belief (despite the wording of the question) that their jobs are too important to be lost as a result of Brexit.
Maybe it's an age thing. Tory and Labour pensioners are not going to lose their jobs. And there are a lot more Tory pensioners than Labour ones.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
If my observations are typical older Labour leave voters often have Labour remain voters as children. It might well be that they are following the debate quite differently to Tory leavers.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Yes and that fall in attractiveness to EU migrants is precisely because of the Leave vote Brexit voters voted for in significant part to produce just such a reduction in immigration.
As for the NHS, the increased training places the government is providing for UK nurses and doctors will help provide a longer term solution to that so the UK is not so reliant on imported healthcare workers
Yes and that fall in attractiveness to EU migrants is precisely because of the Leave vote Brexit voters voted for in significant part to produce just such a reduction in immigration.
Shouldn't the final word of that sentence be 'attractiveness'?
Yes and that fall in attractiveness to EU migrants is precisely because of the Leave vote Brexit voters voted for in significant part to produce just such a reduction in immigration.
Shouldn't the final word of that sentence be 'attractiveness'?
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Not true. The latest migration figures showed that nearly the same number of EU residents immigrated to Britain between January and March of 2017 as did in January to March of 2016:
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
That's a useful reminder of how hard centrist/wet Tories tried to sound tough on Europe in the Hague years with bogus rhetoric which they didn't believe in - one of the many small factors over the years which in the end culminated in Brexit. Michael Ancram was another good example. In reality John Maples was a centrist who would almost certainly have been a solid Remainer had he been alive at the time of EUref.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
But 100,000 people have emigrated here from the EU over the course of 12 months.
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
"swivel-eyed lunacy" is about as funny as jokes based on mental or physical disability generally are. That apart, the only manifestation of (possibly) literal and sectionable insanity we have seen so far in the Great Brexit Debate has not been on the Leaver side. Possibly worth resting the expression, if not withdrawing it altogether from service?
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Not true. The latest migration figures showed that nearly the same number of EU residents immigrated to Britain between January and March of 2017 as did in January to March of 2016:
I mentioned this some months/years ago. Migrants *circulate*: they move to place B, but continue to visit Place A, with frequency decreasing as time goes on. If a deadline is known beforehand then migrants *here* stop visiting *there* (fearing that they will not be let back in) and wannabe migrants *there* start migrating *here* faster (in order to beat the deadline). The result is a short-term bulge in inward migration.
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
It's logical for a conservative (small or large c) party to be anti-EU. Most centre right people value tradition, sovereignty and self-government more than they value the free movement of people and capital and internationalism.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
It's logical for a conservative (small or large c) party to be anti-EU. Most centre right people value tradition, sovereignty and self-government more than they value the free movement of people and capital and internationalism.
[Sucks teeth in] Well, up to a point...
British Conservatism also contains a group in favour of free-trade, light-touch government, low-tax, pro-business, ourward-facing and a strong attraction to the Atlantic Alliance. That (basically Thatcherite) stance has also been an important strand in British Conservative thought, and was in ascendancy in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Although I do agree with your implication that that strand is currently in abeyance (which is one reason why I keep calling May a Christian Democrat)
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Not true. The latest migration figures showed that nearly the same number of EU residents immigrated to Britain between January and March of 2017 as did in January to March of 2016:
I mentioned this some months/years ago. Migrants *circulate*: they move to place B, but continue to visit Place A, with frequency decreasing as time goes on. If a deadline is known beforehand then migrants *here* stop visiting *there* (fearing that they will not be let back in) and wannabe migrants *there* start migrating *here* faster (in order to beat the deadline). The result is a short-term bulge in inward migration.
Actually, that's not happening. Slightly more EU citizens left Britain in January to March 2017 than in the same three months of 2016. Essentially, the most recent three months of data suggest we're back to where we were before the vote. Now, it might be that the migration that happens in those three months is different to the migration that happens in the other nine months of the year so it would be foolish to assume that the figure for April to June will be comparable with those months in 2016. And of course Brexit might start to get more prominence in the EU over the coming months which might have an effect too.
ONS report the migration statistics as a rolling annual total. This is sensible as it takes out the seasonal variations in the data. However, the downside to reporting it as they do is that we will get four quarters of "net migration is down" headlines followed by four quarters of "net migration is up" headlines.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Con leavers are hopeless for labour perhaps. Maybe they can win con remainders over?
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
It's logical for a conservative (small or large c) party to be anti-EU. Most centre right people value tradition, sovereignty and self-government more than they value the free movement of people and capital and internationalism.
[Sucks teeth in] Well, up to a point...
British Conservatism also contains a group in favour of free-trade, light-touch government, low-tax, pro-business, ourward-facing and a strong attraction to the Atlantic Alliance. That (basically Thatcherite) stance has also been an important strand in British Conservative thought, and was in ascendancy in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Although I do agree with your implication that that strand is currently in abeyance (which is one reason why I keep calling May a Christian Democrat)
It's a conflict within any broadly- centre right party, and within the heart of any centre-right voter. Just how much self-government should you sacrifice for the sake of economic advantage.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Not true. The latest migration figures showed that nearly the same number of EU residents immigrated to Britain between January and March of 2017 as did in January to March of 2016:
I mentioned this some months/years ago. Migrants *circulate*: they move to place B, but continue to visit Place A, with frequency decreasing as time goes on. If a deadline is known beforehand then migrants *here* stop visiting *there* (fearing that they will not be let back in) and wannabe migrants *there* start migrating *here* faster (in order to beat the deadline). The result is a short-term bulge in inward migration.
Actually, that's not happening. Slightly more EU citizens left Britain in January to March 2017 than in the same three months of 2016. Essentially, the most recent three months of data suggest we're back to where we were before the vote. Now, it might be that the migration that happens in those three months is different to the migration that happens in the other nine months of the year so it would be foolish to assume that the figure for April to June will be comparable with those months in 2016. And of course Brexit might start to get more prominence in the EU over the coming months which might have an effect too.
ONS report the migration statistics as a rolling annual total. This is sensible as it takes out the seasonal variations in the data. However, the downside to reporting it as they do is that we will get four quarters of "net migration is down" headlines followed by four quarters of "net migration is up" headlines.
Thank you. I hate it when a beautiful theory is derailed by an inconvenient fact...
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
It's logical for a conservative (small or large c) party to be anti-EU. Most centre right people value tradition, sovereignty and self-government more than they value the free movement of people and capital and internationalism.
[Sucks teeth in] Well, up to a point...
British Conservatism also contains a group in favour of free-trade, light-touch government, low-tax, pro-business, ourward-facing and a strong attraction to the Atlantic Alliance. That (basically Thatcherite) stance has also been an important strand in British Conservative thought, and was in ascendancy in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Although I do agree with your implication that that strand is currently in abeyance (which is one reason why I keep calling May a Christian Democrat)
It's a conflict within any broadly- centre right party, and within the heart of any centre-right voter. Just how much self-government should you sacrifice for the sake of economic advantage.
The problem for me is that we ended up with the worst of both worlds. I could have been tempted to vote Remain had the Tories promised to drastically scale back the welfare state (including tax credits). But instead we've had to put up with the high rates of immigration and we've had to carry on paying benefits.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Not true. The latest migration figures showed that nearly the same number of EU residents immigrated to Britain between January and March of 2017 as did in January to March of 2016:
I mentioned this some months/years ago. Migrants *circulate*: they move to place B, but continue to visit Place A, with frequency decreasing as time goes on. If a deadline is known beforehand then migrants *here* stop visiting *there* (fearing that they will not be let back in) and wannabe migrants *there* start migrating *here* faster (in order to beat the deadline). The result is a short-term bulge in inward migration.
Actually, that's not happening. Slightly more EU citizens left Britain in January to March 2017 than in the same three months of 2016. Essentially, the most recent three months of data suggest we're back to where we were before the vote. Now, it might be that the migration that happens in those three months is different to the migration that happens in the other nine months of the year so it would be foolish to assume that the figure for April to June will be comparable with those months in 2016. And of course Brexit might start to get more prominence in the EU over the coming months which might have an effect too.
ONS report the migration statistics as a rolling annual total. This is sensible as it takes out the seasonal variations in the data. However, the downside to reporting it as they do is that we will get four quarters of "net migration is down" headlines followed by four quarters of "net migration is up" headlines.
Thank you. I hate it when a beautiful theory is derailed by an inconvenient fact...
Your theory might come to fruition once a date for departure is set. That might focus some minds. Whilst we're obsessing about Brexit, I suspect the rest of Europe (and the world) has forgotten about it.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
Yeah and it was always obvious they did because you can't separate "the EU" from all the other things that concern voters like immigration, NHS, the economy, crime and punishment, etc.
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Sater has reportedly turned supergrass.
Thanks Yokel. Your posts here are a must read.
+1
I'd love to know Yokel's background - if he could tell us, that is! He seems more on the ball than most.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
They didn't have to. The campaign wasn't fought in a vacuum.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
It's logical for a conservative (small or large c) party to be anti-EU. Most centre right people value tradition, sovereignty and self-government more than they value the free movement of people and capital and internationalism.
[Sucks teeth in] Well, up to a point...
British Conservatism also contains a group in favour of free-trade, light-touch government, low-tax, pro-business, ourward-facing and a strong attraction to the Atlantic Alliance. That (basically Thatcherite) stance has also been an important strand in British Conservative thought, and was in ascendancy in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Although I do agree with your implication that that strand is currently in abeyance (which is one reason why I keep calling May a Christian Democrat)
It's a conflict within any broadly- centre right party, and within the heart of any centre-right voter. Just how much self-government should you sacrifice for the sake of economic advantage.
That depends on who is getting the economic advantage.
I doubt many centre-right voters will support more money for the 1% if it means lower pay rises for themselves.
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Well I don't blame you for being cautious.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Well I don't blame you for being cautious.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
Doesn't someone typically serve as escrow for PB bets?
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
I'm not sure the fact they have documents in various places necessarily means they are not flexible.
If you read the thread, their position papers are agreed by all members, by several different organs of the EU. Not fixed, but not easily changed without extensive consultation. The length of that probably exceeds the span of time available. So unless an issue really is a deal breaker, then it is not worth arguing over.
In practice, it will be take it or leave it, and with WTO Brexit as default, that is where the probable outcome lies.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Well I don't blame you for being cautious.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
I'm not sure the fact they have documents in various places necessarily means they are not flexible.
If you read the thread, their position papers are agreed by all members, by several different organs of the EU. Not fixed, but not easily changed without extensive consultation. The length of that probably exceeds the span of time available. So unless an issue really is a deal breaker, then it is not worth arguing over.
In practice, it will be take it or leave it, and with WTO Brexit as default, that is where the probable outcome lies.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Your knowledge is very poor. If Labour were to get a majority, 20 or so seats will come from the SNP.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Well I don't blame you for being cautious.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
Doesn't someone typically serve as escrow for PB bets?
Peter the Punter used to but I'm not sure if he does anymore. My £500 bet was before that.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Your knowledge is very poor. If Labour were to get a majority, 20 or so seats will come from the SNP.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Your knowledge is very poor. If Labour were to get a majority, 20 or so seats will come from the SNP.
It's been calculated that if the Scottish GE vote splits CON/LAB/SNP 30% each then the SNP will be reduced to just 6 MPs. That's why the SNP is never going to back an early election.
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Your knowledge is very poor. If Labour were to get a majority, 20 or so seats will come from the SNP.
Many others would come from Tory Remainers, or the substantial minority that really aren't that bothered about Europe, or simply bored and want to move on to other matters.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
The Brexit devaluation of the pound is making UK a lot less attractive to EU migrants and is going to add enormously to the challenges facing the NHS this winter. The international exchange value of their earnings has been slashed by getting on for quarter.
Which would give higher pay rises and lower housing costs than they would otherwise be.
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
I don't bet with fellow PBers after being robbed of £500 a few years ago and I only bet if I can see value.
Well I don't blame you for being cautious.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
The fact that Conservative voters feel so strongly in favour of Brexit is bad news for Labour, who it should be remembered need to win 60 marginal seats next time mainly from the Tories rather than -as in June -piling up votes in seats it already holds.
Your knowledge is very poor. If Labour were to get a majority, 20 or so seats will come from the SNP.
Many others would come from Tory Remainers, or the substantial minority that really aren't that bothered about Europe, or simply bored and want to move on to other matters.
If Tory Remainers did not vote Labour or LD in 2017 why should they in 2020? If Corbyn abandons ending FOM on the other hand some Labour Leavers who stuck with him last time may switch next time if the Tories have ended FOM by then
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
When They've Worked Out What The Deal Is They Will Let Us Know.
The government are going for WTO Brexit. It is the only goal that fits their current behaviour.
As Columbo would say, "There's just one more thing..." The government isn't making any practical preparations for such an outcome which should tell you that even if their political behaviour points in that direction, that cannot be the real goal.
It looks to me like the 31% of Con leavers answering "No I would not" are the voters who will deliver a majority Labour government at the next election.
Labour need to relentlessly pound the tories for "making the country poorer"
The 31% of Con leavers answering "No I would not" is where labour's majority comes from.
Only assuming they all lose their job which is highly unlikely, it is more likely the 23% of Labour Leavers will be voting at a general election with the Tories having ended FOM and Labour committed to continuing it for years
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
What they cared about was that they disliked the EU.
"All this is important because in the weeks ahead TMay’s government is going to face the huge challenge of getting the “Great” Repeal Act through the Commons and the Lords and will require very skilled party management. Labour appears to be preparing the ground for a tough parliamentary battle," says OGH.
Just so. It is high time that Labour started a tough parliamentary battle. For the last two years they have been no more than Mrs May`s poodle.
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
The fudge won't be in the outcomes. The fudge is that this is a negotiation at all. It's more a sorting out of things, at least from the EU's point of view. What happens to the aspidistra, type of thing. We think it's important a deal is seen to be made.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
When They've Worked Out What The Deal Is They Will Let Us Know.
The government are going for WTO Brexit. It is the only goal that fits their current behaviour.
As Columbo would say, "There's just one more thing..." The government isn't making any practical preparations for such an outcome which should tell you that even if their political behaviour points in that direction, that cannot be the real goal.
The lack of preparation for WTO Brexit is probably just incompetence combined with delusion about "cake and eat it".
This from Bloomberg, the media group of the arch globalist and establishment 'centrist' Michael Bloomberg. Though even this journalist states 'One could argue that the Brexit vote has alarmed EU citizens enough to consider leaving the U.K. or simply staying away in the first place. But "Brexodus" may well be a myth. Though the latest data show a substantial drop in net migration from Eastern Europe, there is still a net inflow. Perhaps, for some Brexit voters, this reduction in immigration is adequate compensation for the current uncertainties and the loss of the U.K.'s vote.'
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
The fudge won't be in the outcomes. The fudge is that this is a negotiation at all. It's more a sorting out of things, at least from the EU's point of view. What happens to the aspidistra, type of thing. We think it's important a deal is seen to be made.
The piece by Leonid Bershidsky I posted below concurs with your long-standing view:
It will last as long as it takes the U.K. and the EU to agree on a new trade deal; otherwise, a transition is pointless. But the U.K. cannot dictate the pace of the negotiations, and the EU isn't interested in dictating it as long as the transition period preserves current arrangements. The EU, after all, didn't initiate Brexit; it's happy for the U.K. to stay on current terms, and if it loses its vote, too, that'll only be a bonus.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
What they cared about was that they disliked the EU.
Much like the Gordon rioters who were against Popery, but not certain whether this was a man or a horse...
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
What they cared about was that they disliked the EU.
Top 3 reasons for voting Leave given by Leave voters based on a referendum day survey of 12,369 voters
1. The principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK.
2. Voting to leave offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.
3. Remaining meant little or no choice about how the EU expanded its membership or powers.
The £350 m a week for the NHS did not even feature
This from Bloomberg, the media group of the arch globalist and establishment 'centrist' Michael Bloomberg. Though even this journalist states 'One could argue that the Brexit vote has alarmed EU citizens enough to consider leaving the U.K. or simply staying away in the first place. But "Brexodus" may well be a myth. Though the latest data show a substantial drop in net migration from Eastern Europe, there is still a net inflow. Perhaps, for some Brexit voters, this reduction in immigration is adequate compensation for the current uncertainties and the loss of the U.K.'s vote.'
A new word has entered the lexicon – Brexodus – to reflect the claim that Europeans are leaving in droves as they shun post-Brexit Britain.
But it is a funny sort of Brexodus which leaves the number of European nationals in Britain at an all-time high. While the quarterly immigration figures did show a significant reduction in the scale of EU immigration to the UK, and a rise in the number of Europeans departing, those figures also showed that twice as many Europeans came to the UK as departed from it, with an estimated 122,000 EU nationals leaving the UK while 249,000 arrived in the year to March 2017.
Given some of those Labour Leave voters may feel they have already lost a job to an EU migrant though it depends how the question is phrased
Remember when Mike used to tell us nobody cared about the EU?
It turned out that they cared a great deal.
What they cared about was another £350m a week into the NHS. That was what the official leave campaign said it was about and was the main thrust on their bus and in their TV broadcasts. The official campaign barely mentioned immigration.
What they cared about was that they disliked the EU.
Much like the Gordon rioters who were against Popery, but not certain whether this was a man or a horse...
Hostility towards the EU is pretty well-documented by Nat Soc Cen surveys.
Taking every word from the European side as gospel, are we?
Of course he is, remember the golden rule:
EU = good
UK = bad
The same childish rubbish day after day, and I am afraid OGH sets the tone.
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
I'm not sure the fact they have documents in various places necessarily means they are not flexible.
If you read the thread, their position papers are agreed by all members, by several different organs of the EU. Not fixed, but not easily changed without extensive consultation. The length of that probably exceeds the span of time available. So unless an issue really is a deal breaker, then it is not worth arguing over.
In practice, it will be take it or leave it, and with WTO Brexit as default, that is where the probable outcome lies.
So the EU aren't really negotiating, just presenting the internally agreed position for us to accept as a fait accompli.
That will work well.
Excuse me if in future I take any protestations from them about lack of progress with contempt and reply with 'negotiation is not presentation of you position and implementation'
David Allen Green did a good thread on this. For better or worse there is very little flexibility in the EU position, we really have to decide if it works for us or whether we prefer to have WTO Brexit.
When They've Worked Out What The Deal Is They Will Let Us Know.
The government are going for WTO Brexit. It is the only goal that fits their current behaviour.
I don't think any goal fits their current behavior.
When a close relative was dying, I was thrashing about trying to work out timetables and the doctor had to take me aside and point out gently that this person was dying, dying quickly, and that there was nothing to do. I used to know a divorce lawyer and she told me about the point where you have to tell them that they can't stay married to somebody who doesn't want to be married to them. The UK Government has not yet hit these points and is oscillating between begging ("deep and special relationship") and anger ("stubborn and unreasonable"). Sooner or later it would be better if a neutral friend took Davies aside and quietly explained his position.
Though the latest data show a substantial drop in net migration from Eastern Europe, there is still a net inflow. Perhaps, for some Brexit voters, this reduction in immigration is adequate compensation for the current uncertainties and the loss of the U.K.'s vote.'
A reduction in net inward migration (provided it remains positive) is not a reduction in immigrants, it's an increase. The most that you can say is it's not going up as fast.
This from Bloomberg, the media group of the arch globalist and establishment 'centrist' Michael Bloomberg. Though even this journalist states 'One could argue that the Brexit vote has alarmed EU citizens enough to consider leaving the U.K. or simply staying away in the first place. But "Brexodus" may well be a myth. Though the latest data show a substantial drop in net migration from Eastern Europe, there is still a net inflow. Perhaps, for some Brexit voters, this reduction in immigration is adequate compensation for the current uncertainties and the loss of the U.K.'s vote.'
A new word has entered the lexicon – Brexodus – to reflect the claim that Europeans are leaving in droves as they shun post-Brexit Britain.
But it is a funny sort of Brexodus which leaves the number of European nationals in Britain at an all-time high. While the quarterly immigration figures did show a significant reduction in the scale of EU immigration to the UK, and a rise in the number of Europeans departing, those figures also showed that twice as many Europeans came to the UK as departed from it, with an estimated 122,000 EU nationals leaving the UK while 249,000 arrived in the year to March 2017.
Though the latest data show a substantial drop in net migration from Eastern Europe, there is still a net inflow. Perhaps, for some Brexit voters, this reduction in immigration is adequate compensation for the current uncertainties and the loss of the U.K.'s vote.'
A reduction in net inward migration (provided it remains positive) is not a reduction in immigrants, it's an increase. The most that you can say is it's not going up as fast.
It is the biggest drop in the rate of net migration for years but as I say still shows FOM needs to be controlled and reduced for a number of years post Brexit
We should all calm down about the negotiations, I did not want to leave but we have no influene on what happens. In the end he negotiators will either be heros or villains and will hve to face the consequences.
City sources say that firms want a paper setting out the government’s intention for a transitional arrangement in financial services as soon as possible, so that a binding agreement with the EU can be completed this year. If a deal is not in place by the start of 2018, finance companies believe they will have to begin preparing for a hard Brexit in earnest. This would mean accelerating plans to shift operations from the UK to EU countries.
Sooner or later it would be better if a neutral friend took Davies aside and quietly explained his position.
Personally, I think it would be better if someone took Davies aside and fired him on the spot. In fact none of the Three Brexiteers seems to be any good at anything they do.
What, in 12 months, have Fox, Boris and Davies accomplished? Anything of note?
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Sater has reportedly turned supergrass.
Thanks Yokel. Your posts here are a must read.
+1
I'd love to know Yokel's background - if he could tell us, that is! He seems more on the ball than most.
Yes, often, though nobody's always right. IIRC he predicted that Assad was toast a couple of years ago, when that was the consensus of Western intelligence analysts.Yokel is very helpful in giving us insight into what our analysts are thinking, but that can sometimes show weaknesses in that.
Comments
Trumpton
Back in August 2016 I posted a few names of associates that would come back and haunt Trump. One was Russian mobster and Trump partner/advisor Felix Sater.
Sater has reportedly turned supergrass.
I'd love to know Yokel's background - if he could tell us, that is! He seems more on the ball than most.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/anti-europeans-must-be-reined-in-warns-clarke-738277.html
Mr Clarke opposed growing demands by sceptics for a future Tory government to renegotiate the Treaty of Rome, suggesting this was code for their goal of leaving the EU.
But the divide on Europe widened when John Maples, the shadow Foreign Secretary, announced that one of the first acts of an incoming Tory government would be to negotiate an amendment to the treaty allowing member states to opt out of future EU legislation.
Mr Maples toned down his speech, dropping plans to compare the threat to Britain from the EU to that from Nazi Germany. His original draft said that although his generation had not fought to secure Britain's freedom, it faced "a threat to our freedom and independence every bit as great".
As for the NHS, the increased training places the government is providing for UK nurses and doctors will help provide a longer term solution to that so the UK is not so reliant on imported healthcare workers
https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av4jQcUMVtBpiBtBI6GQaRTA-_MO
British Conservatism also contains a group in favour of free-trade, light-touch government, low-tax, pro-business, ourward-facing and a strong attraction to the Atlantic Alliance. That (basically Thatcherite) stance has also been an important strand in British Conservative thought, and was in ascendancy in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Although I do agree with your implication that that strand is currently in abeyance (which is one reason why I keep calling May a Christian Democrat)
ONS report the migration statistics as a rolling annual total. This is sensible as it takes out the seasonal variations in the data. However, the downside to reporting it as they do is that we will get four quarters of "net migration is down" headlines followed by four quarters of "net migration is up" headlines.
Well, that's my background-sounds-whilst-working sorted out...
[EDIT: link to list, not individual entry]
https://twitter.com/spajw/status/902210746062434304
I think they would be good things, how about you Mike ?
But you seem to be predicting net emigration from the UK this year - if so would you like to have a bet on that ?
All of us who have laid the draw will like that declaration.
https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/901886935735705600
I doubt many centre-right voters will support more money for the 1% if it means lower pay rises for themselves.
I've marked a couple of people I know as pricks after they thought they can welch on pub bets with the phrase "I wasn't being serious".
In practice, it will be take it or leave it, and with WTO Brexit as default, that is where the probable outcome lies.
https://m.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/eisenhower-lost-a-bet-and-had-to-give-montgomery-his-own-b-17.html
When They've Worked Out What The Deal Is They Will Let Us Know.
Biggest issue is the NHS
https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/nhs-and-brexit-remain-biggest-issues-facing-country
For rational people, Europe is way down the list.
Labour need to relentlessly pound the tories for "making the country poorer"
Would you consider the death of your first child as a PRICE WORTH PAYING for remaining in the EU ?
Just so. It is high time that Labour started a tough parliamentary battle. For the last two years they have been no more than Mrs May`s poodle.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-28/brexit-is-beginning-to-look-like-no-brexit
Go on, guess!
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-41070227
It will last as long as it takes the U.K. and the EU to agree on a new trade deal; otherwise, a transition is pointless. But the U.K. cannot dictate the pace of the negotiations, and the EU isn't interested in dictating it as long as the transition period preserves current arrangements. The EU, after all, didn't initiate Brexit; it's happy for the U.K. to stay on current terms, and if it loses its vote, too, that'll only be a bonus.
1. The principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK.
2. Voting to leave offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.
3. Remaining meant little or no choice about how the EU expanded its membership or powers.
The £350 m a week for the NHS did not even feature
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/
But it is a funny sort of Brexodus which leaves the number of European nationals in Britain at an all-time high. While the quarterly immigration figures did show a significant reduction in the scale of EU immigration to the UK, and a rise in the number of Europeans departing, those figures also showed that twice as many Europeans came to the UK as departed from it, with an estimated 122,000 EU nationals leaving the UK while 249,000 arrived in the year to March 2017.
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/08/debunking-the-brexodus-myth/
That will work well.
Excuse me if in future I take any protestations from them about lack of progress with contempt and reply with 'negotiation is not presentation of you position and implementation'
When a close relative was dying, I was thrashing about trying to work out timetables and the doctor had to take me aside and point out gently that this person was dying, dying quickly, and that there was nothing to do. I used to know a divorce lawyer and she told me about the point where you have to tell them that they can't stay married to somebody who doesn't want to be married to them. The UK Government has not yet hit these points and is oscillating between begging ("deep and special relationship") and anger ("stubborn and unreasonable"). Sooner or later it would be better if a neutral friend took Davies aside and quietly explained his position.
Shock horror.
It seemed like an unlikely story before the denial, the existence of which gives it a little smidgen of credibility.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-popularity-approval-rating-record-lows-ifop-poll-election-landslide-a7915876.html
City sources say that firms want a paper setting out the government’s intention for a transitional arrangement in financial services as soon as possible, so that a binding agreement with the EU can be completed this year. If a deal is not in place by the start of 2018, finance companies believe they will have to begin preparing for a hard Brexit in earnest. This would mean accelerating plans to shift operations from the UK to EU countries.
What, in 12 months, have Fox, Boris and Davies accomplished? Anything of note?