Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Two local by-elections tonight – both LAB defences

12346»

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,403
    There's a new thread!
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    There's only one meaning - perplexed, bewildered:

    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nonplus
    non·plussed
    nänˈpləst/Submit
    adjective
    1.
    (of a person) surprised and confused so much that they are unsure how to react.
    "he would be completely nonplussed and embarrassed at the idea"
    2.
    NORTH AMERICANinformal
    (of a person) not disconcerted; unperturbed.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,675

    I prefer Bath for the LibDems.
    I think Bath is a steal.
  • theakestheakes Posts: 962
    Harry Hayfield keeps expecting the Lib Dem to have a high reasonable vote, despite evidence to the contrary. Last night Blacon 2.7%. From what I can see Lib Dems are vastly over optimistic at the moment, I would be suprised if they got 15 MP's, amazed at 20, I would bet on 12-13. Their main gain from the election may well be getting back into a reasonable second place in a lot of seats where they fell back in 2015.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,722
    theakes said:

    Harry Hayfield keeps expecting the Lib Dem to have a high reasonable vote, despite evidence to the contrary. Last night Blacon 2.7%. From what I can see Lib Dems are vastly over optimistic at the moment, I would be suprised if they got 15 MP's, amazed at 20, I would bet on 12-13. Their main gain from the election may well be getting back into a reasonable second place in a lot of seats where they fell back in 2015.

    I think it's just guessing since occasionally they cone from nowhere to win, so worth a hit.
  • CyanCyan Posts: 1,262
    edited April 2017
    (moved to new thread)
  • theakestheakes Posts: 962
    Kenton East Lib Dem vote 2.1% not 21%, if I was Harry I would stop predicting . Conservatives walked it, the omens for June 8th look sensational for them.
This discussion has been closed.