Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » It looks as though those who bet that the PVV wouldn’t do it i

135

Comments

  • Options
    @PickardJE: The junior partner in Holland's coalition is meanwhile expected to slump from 25% to 6%, says BBC. Remind. You. Of. Anyone?
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited March 2017
    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited March 2017
    I didn't bet on the Dutch election because between reading a tip on here and switching tabs to bet fair I get confused between the PVV and the VVD and the VPV and the PVC and the PCP and give up in disgust.
  • Options

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    Correct - plain childishness. We rise above such flippery.

    BTW many congratulations on your current Fantasy League position and Liverpool's too - jolly well done.
  • Options
    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Alistair said:

    I didn't bet on the Dutch election because between reading a tip on here and switching tabs to bet fair I get confused between the PVV and the VVD and the VPV and the PVC and the PCP and give up in disgust.

    2 monitors (or more) is the only way to follow PB tips...
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920

    Incidentally, it's worth noting that Wilders is only going to get about 10% of the total vote. He got an awful lot of coverage for that - a bit as though the whole western world was riveted by the performance of the British LibDems.

    They aren't? :open_mouth:
  • Options

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    Correct - plain childishness. We rise above such flippery.

    BTW many congratulations on your current Fantasy League position and Liverpool's too - jolly well done.
    How long is Harry Kane going to be out for ?
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.
  • Options
    steve_garnersteve_garner Posts: 1,019
  • Options

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    Correct - plain childishness. We rise above such flippery.

    BTW many congratulations on your current Fantasy League position and Liverpool's too - jolly well done.
    How long is Harry Kane going to be out for ?
    Too long - 5th beckons for my boys unless Vincent reinvents himself from Bobby Sol 2 to someone more adept with a banjo/barn door.
  • Options
    AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    Scott_P said:
    I'd give that a 8/10 on the Expressometer. Nothing on immigration, see.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,144
    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
    The Natural Law party could end up holding the balance.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006
    So CDA won the 4th seat. Up 5% on last time. What did CDA get overall last time as a %?
    CDA up 5% on 5th seat.

    1000/1 on Betfair.
  • Options
    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,446
    IanB2 said:

    surbiton said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    What's wrong with that ?
    Precisely. Indeed, imagine we had such a representative parliament, and someone came along and suggested we create a new system to take the seats off all the small parties and hand majority power to a party with 36% of the vote mostly concentrated at one end of the country - everyone would think they were mad.

    Hence all the clamour for non-PR in the Netherlands (not)!
    Tone got a majority on only 35% in 2005...
  • Options
    FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047
    Anorak said:

    Scott_P said:
    I'd give that a 8/10 on the Expressometer. Nothing on immigration, see.
    In German?
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,144

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    It's downright eccentric. This isn't the USA.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388

    @PickardJE: The junior partner in Holland's coalition is meanwhile expected to slump from 25% to 6%, says BBC. Remind. You. Of. Anyone?

    The Labour Party at the next election?
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,446

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    American ownership??
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    IanB2 said:

    Bojabob said:

    surbiton said:

    Bojabob said:

    Evening all.

    I have been entirely unmoved by the mini shambles over NIC. The entire episode has merely exposed again what a tragic excuse for an opposition we have. Labour have out shambled the government.

    Yvette Cooper's intervention was good. She showed the same ability to make a comment that cut through that stood out because it is lacking in the front man. Nothing in this case to do with shades of political opinion, just basic competence or the lack of it.
    That was the only good bit. McDonnell was pathetic. He was backing rich Accountants and Barristers paying less NIC. Corbyn as usual was abysmal.
    I didn't see or hear of Yvette. Any link/clip?
    She wasn't that good, she just answered a bog standard question in a reasonably straightforward way. That people are commenting shows how low the bar has fallen within Labour.
    Indeed. Just seen it. As you say, straightforward stuff but everything is relative I guess.

    @TheScreamingEagles – thanks for posting.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,233
    Pulpstar said:

    I'm very comfortable with my Le Pen lay now tbh.

    The French and Dutch are balls-deep into the EU Project, so will never go full-on Populist.

    Scott_P said:
    May is making a habit of cultivating enemies on the sane wing of the party. She seems to prefer the company of the frothing loons. This is going to get nasty.

    In other news good to see the Dutch results; must be disappointing for our nativist revolution fanboi/gurls

  • Options

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    Correct - plain childishness. We rise above such flippery.

    BTW many congratulations on your current Fantasy League position and Liverpool's too - jolly well done.
    How long is Harry Kane going to be out for ?
    Too long - 5th beckons for my boys unless Vincent reinvents himself from Bobby Sol 2 to someone more adept with a banjo/barn door.
    Well Liverpool are the Premier League's leading goalscorers and we've played the season without a recognised striker.
  • Options

    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'

    Quality. [TSE level]
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    IanB2 said:

    surbiton said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    What's wrong with that ?
    Precisely. Indeed, imagine we had such a representative parliament, and someone came along and suggested we create a new system to take the seats off all the small parties and hand majority power to a party with 36% of the vote mostly concentrated at one end of the country - everyone would think they were mad.

    Hence all the clamour for non-PR in the Netherlands (not)!
    Actually, the larger parties might vote for that, in order to kill the small fry.
  • Options

    @PickardJE: The junior partner in Holland's coalition is meanwhile expected to slump from 25% to 6%, says BBC. Remind. You. Of. Anyone?

    The Labour Party at the next election?
    Nah, I'm writing a piece on why the polls are underestimating Labour
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
    And the current government would be a UKIP-Tory coalition taking us out the E Oh wait :D
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    The (ex)home of Lady Zia Wernher, I believe.
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited March 2017
    Alistair said:

    I didn't bet on the Dutch election because between reading a tip on here and switching tabs to bet fair I get confused between the PVV and the VVD and the VPV and the PVC and the PCP and give up in disgust.

    :lol: - You have my sympathy.
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693

    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
    lol

    Personally I'm in favour of electoral reform, but AV is a bit pants.

    My slightly radical suggestion would be to have generational constituencies, instead of geographical ones.
  • Options
    RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'

    You're classier than that.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,164
    edited March 2017

    Pulpstar said:

    I'm very comfortable with my Le Pen lay now tbh.

    The French and Dutch are balls-deep into the EU Project, so will never go full-on Populist.

    Scott_P said:
    May is making a habit of cultivating enemies on the sane wing of the party. She seems to prefer the company of the frothing loons. This is going to get nasty.

    In other news good to see the Dutch results; must be disappointing for our nativist revolution fanboi/gurls

    For now, once the negotiations begin the frothing loons will soon begin to realise they will not be getting everything their own way, plus notice May warmly embraced Rutte at the recent EU summit and hosted Macron at No 10, in a week when Farage met Le Pen and given Kippers' support for Wilders she is not nearly as far right as some hardcore Remainers like to portray her and has not met either the PVV or FN leader
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    edited March 2017
    RoyalBlue said:

    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'

    You're classier than that.
    How can she get pregnant on a 'Pull out'?
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
    Would my pro-London, europhile, pro-market, social liberal, secularist, social democratic, pro-nuclear, republican, antiracist, prison-reforming, anti grammar school, Scottish nationalist, party be in with a shout do you think?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,797

    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'

    Nice, but it has the drawback that if you say something is ironic, it tends to lose its irony.

  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    philiph said:

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    The (ex)home of Lady Zia Wernher, I believe.
    Rather sadly, its last owner committed suicide. It was a wonderful, if slightly dilapidated house, with an interesting collection of materials about the Romanov family, to whom Lady Zia was related.

    It's now a very stylish hotel, although the Werners still retain the surrounding farmland.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642

    Pulpstar said:

    I'm very comfortable with my Le Pen lay now tbh.

    The French and Dutch are balls-deep into the EU Project, so will never go full-on Populist.

    Scott_P said:
    May is making a habit of cultivating enemies on the sane wing of the party. She seems to prefer the company of the frothing loons. This is going to get nasty.

    In other news good to see the Dutch results; must be disappointing for our nativist revolution fanboi/gurls

    Yes we should all raise a glass to the defeat of the racist moron in the Netherlands
  • Options
    steve_garnersteve_garner Posts: 1,019
    Philip Hammond would be well advised to ask George Osborne how to deal with bad press after budget u-turns. Osborne's an expert.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    Meerssen narrowly goes VVD
  • Options
    Pong said:

    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
    lol

    Personally I'm in favour of electoral reform, but AV is a bit pants.

    My slightly radical suggestion would be to have generational constituencies, instead of geographical ones.
    Multi-member STV is the way to go.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    Bojabob said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
    Would my pro-London, europhile, pro-market, social liberal, secularist, social democratic, pro-nuclear, republican, antiracist, prison-reforming, anti grammar school, Scottish nationalist, party be in with a shout do you think?
    Probably. You'd only need about 55,000 votes nationwide.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    Nice to see the fascist fail to deliver. Good on the Dutch. Commisserations to all those on the right who were kind of hoping he'd get one over the liberal elite. Never mind. Now onto France.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    RIJNWAARDEN PdvA down from 28% to 4.5%
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    It's downright eccentric. This isn't the USA.
    It's the Brexit reality. Back to Fahrenheit, pounds and ounces, etc... Looking forward to 12 pennies to the shilling.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006
    Barnesian said:

    So CDA won the 4th seat. Up 5% on last time. What did CDA get overall last time as a %?
    CDA up 5% on 5th seat.

    1000/1 on Betfair.

    Answering my own question, they got about 9% (and 13 seats). So if they are up 5% to 14% they will get 21 seats, - probably more than PVV but not as much as VVD.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    edited March 2017
    Based on current swing it is VVD 32 PVV 20 CDA 19 D66 18

    i.e. the exit poll almost bang on
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    VVD winning places in the arse end of nowhere, the PVV won't improve when Amsterdam etc come in.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,164
    edited March 2017

    Nice to see the fascist fail to deliver. Good on the Dutch. Commisserations to all those on the right who were kind of hoping he'd get one over the liberal elite. Never mind. Now onto France.

    Rutte may technically represent a liberal party but a man who says 'migrants be normal or be gone' as he did in the campaign will certainly not be getting a dinner invitation from Polly Toynbee anytime soon!
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    Sean_F said:

    philiph said:

    O/T workshop at Luton Hoo today - in the Gents above every urinal there are beautifully framed Matt cartoons...

    THAT is how you define a place with class...

    Got some odd looks mind you working my way round.

    Piss artist?
    Too high up I'd hope
    This is a conversation that won't end well.
    It will end in a piss off I imagine.
    As is Scrapheap and I would ever engage in some oneupmanship :lol:
    The (ex)home of Lady Zia Wernher, I believe.
    Rather sadly, its last owner committed suicide. It was a wonderful, if slightly dilapidated house, with an interesting collection of materials about the Romanov family, to whom Lady Zia was related.

    It's now a very stylish hotel, although the Werners still retain the surrounding farmland.
    I was familiar with the Romanov collection and connection, but unaware of the suicide.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Nice to see the fascist fail to deliver. Good on the Dutch. Commisserations to all those on the right who were kind of hoping he'd get one over the liberal elite. Never mind. Now onto France.

    Yeah ! The Dutch saw of the fascist bastard.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    RoyalBlue said:

    Asking for a friend, is this line too much for an upcoming PB thread header?

    'As ironic as getting your girlfriend pregnant on your pull out sofa bed'

    You're classier than that.
    is he? ;)
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    Barnesian said:

    Barnesian said:

    So CDA won the 4th seat. Up 5% on last time. What did CDA get overall last time as a %?
    CDA up 5% on 5th seat.

    1000/1 on Betfair.

    Answering my own question, they got about 9% (and 13 seats). So if they are up 5% to 14% they will get 21 seats, - probably more than PVV but not as much as VVD.
    Set to win 19 seats on current swing.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I imagine that in addition to the above, you would have a Christian fundamentalist party, an Islamic Party, an Animal Rights party, a Pensioners' Party, a rural interests' party, a London interests' party, a party dedicated to rejoining the EU, and no doubt many more.
    Would my pro-London, europhile, pro-market, social liberal, secularist, social democratic, pro-nuclear, republican, antiracist, prison-reforming, anti grammar school, Scottish nationalist, party be in with a shout do you think?
    Probably. You'd only need about 55,000 votes nationwide.
    Okay. I'm all for it. I hereby disown my lifelong commitment to FPP.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001

    Based on current swing it is VVD 32 PVV 20 CDA 19 D66 18

    i.e. the exit poll almost bang on

    120-1 was all kinds of wrong for the CDA earlier, PVV at 2.5

    Bit like UKIP and the Tories in Stoke actually.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,261

    Nice to see the fascist fail to deliver. Good on the Dutch. Commisserations to all those on the right who were kind of hoping he'd get one over the liberal elite. Never mind. Now onto France.

    A palpable sense of tristesse in the air.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Philip Hammond would be well advised to ask George Osborne how to deal with bad press after budget u-turns. Osborne's an expert.

    Take a holiday?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    Weak weak weak !

    But what on earth is Corbyn doing opposing progressive taxation !?
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,094
    Pulpstar said:

    VVD winning places in the arse end of nowhere, the PVV won't improve when Amsterdam etc come in.

    Their vote is down everywhere compared to the last election though. Does anyone know if the results we have got so far are consistent with the exit poll?
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,978
    Anorak said:

    Hover with mouse gives name.

    20 years ago 99% of the population would have thought that was a cryptic crossword clue.
    Instagram. Snapchat. WhatsApp. All less than ten years old.

    Tell you what'll make you feel old. You know the song "Baby Got Back" ("I like big butts and I cannot lie..."). Quarter of a century old.

    Oh. My. Gahd. Becky...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aikqDq5LXFY
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    Virtually everyone uses feet, inches, and pounds. In my experience Fahrenheit is pretty widely used.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    The mask drops and reveals she is frit.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    CDA probably shouldn't be 1000-1...
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,001
    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    Two peas in a pod.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @bbclaurak: Concern in tory party now about Hammond's political judgement but also in Treasury about how they will ever be able to crack govt spending
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    I hope not!
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,967
    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    She's not in office to the things that the Left want her to do.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    Current project (by alignment)

    VVD 33 D66 21 CDA 18 require support of CU 6

    GL 16 SP 16 PvdA 9 D66 21 well short


  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693

    Pong said:

    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
    lol

    Personally I'm in favour of electoral reform, but AV is a bit pants.

    My slightly radical suggestion would be to have generational constituencies, instead of geographical ones.
    Multi-member STV is the way to go.
    I'd rather have that than FPTP.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    Virtually everyone uses feet, inches, and pounds. In my experience Fahrenheit is pretty widely used.
    Interesting. As I say, the imperial system in general is indeed widely used – more so than metric, I would say – but the exception to that in my experience is Fahrenheit.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    edited March 2017
    Pulpstar said:

    CDA probably shouldn't be 1000-1...

    My current projection 18 compared to VVD 33

    I'll give anyone evens on CDA+9.5 (i.e. I'm backing my projection)
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,144
    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    She's not in office to the things that the Left want her to do.
    Oh but you're wrong. She's implementing a key part of Michael Foot's manifesto.
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,388
    @peter_from_putney

    First PVV win!
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    Virtually everyone uses feet, inches, and pounds. In my experience Fahrenheit is pretty widely used.
    As I'm old and decrepit I use Fahrenheit in some circumstances and C in others. At minus 40F I'm buggered.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,068

    Pong said:

    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
    lol

    Personally I'm in favour of electoral reform, but AV is a bit pants.

    My slightly radical suggestion would be to have generational constituencies, instead of geographical ones.
    Multi-member STV is the way to go.
    With one big constituency, and only one mp.
  • Options

    @peter_from_putney

    First PVV win!

    Yep!

    That's 1 of my 5 in the "White Rabbit Special" market. Simpleveld, in Limburg.

    Also 2 northern ones for CDA.

    14/388 now in.

    Quite a few party leaders have now appeared at their election night do's - Rutte, Pechtold, Klaver all in last 20-30 mins or so.

    Wilders having no party for PVV and is holed up at Parliament in the Hague.
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    Pong said:

    Pong said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Sean_F said:

    nunu said:

    Sean_F said:

    rcs1000 said:

    So, VVD + CDA + D66 (essentially a LD - Conservative coalition) looks inevitable, but it'll need someone else to get it over 75 seats?

    The oldies? The Christians? The Calvinists? The Animal Lovers? The Environmentalists?

    The Calvinists never go into government, though presumably they'd be more likely to vote Right than Left.
    Interesting how many different types of parties can pop up inder PR. I wonder what we could have if we had PR.....a Methodist party maybe.
    If we had pure PR like the Dutch, and treated the whole UK as single constituency, a party would only need to win 0.17% of the vote to get into Parliament.

    So, in addition to the current parties, the BNP, English Democrats, Socialist Labour Party, TUSC, Mebyon Kernow, Womens' Equality Party, NF, would probably have at least 1 MP, and there'd be a host of religious parties and special interest groups getting into Parliament.
    It would be brilliant from a betting perspective.
    I'm not so sure.

    I think a lot of the fun & value in political betting comes from converting vote shares into FPTP seats/ECV's.

    Pure PR takes an edge away from us psephogeek punters.
    Is why I was in favour of AV, gave so many other betting opportunities.
    lol

    Personally I'm in favour of electoral reform, but AV is a bit pants.

    My slightly radical suggestion would be to have generational constituencies, instead of geographical ones.
    Multi-member STV is the way to go.
    With one big constituency, and only one mp.
    I'm coming to the conclusion we need to abolish Parliament, and just have a directly elected Dictator Prime Minister, with cabinet and ministers filled by technocrats
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,029

    If the pattern of the Greens doing well and the mainstream left doing badly is repeated in Germany, my tip of a Jamaica coalition looks sound.

    I think Bild has had a headline of 'Kommt der Jamaika-Coalition!' for every election of the last 20 years and it and kommt it never does.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    Weak weak weak !

    But what on earth is Corbyn doing opposing progressive taxation !?

    As we all know, Corbyn is profoundly stupid.

    May cowers in the face of the right wing press. Davis is clueless about Brexit. The Conservative party stands on the brink of a major electoral expenses scandal.

    Ed Miliband is the second worst leader Labour has had since WW2. He would be 20% ahead in the polls currently and Labour would still have an MP in Copeland.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    She's not in office to the things that the Left want her to do.
    Agreed. Who and what exactly is she in office for?
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    Bojabob said:

    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    Virtually everyone uses feet, inches, and pounds. In my experience Fahrenheit is pretty widely used.
    Interesting. As I say, the imperial system in general is indeed widely used – more so than metric, I would say – but the exception to that in my experience is Fahrenheit.
    It's a mix but I think there's a slow drift to metric. I don't know the last time I heard fluid ounces used, rather than ml, for example. Pints, yes, but only within the context of milk, beer or the like. Fahrenheit seems to be another that's dropping out of usage.

    Length and weight is mix and match. No-one knows how tall or heavy they are in metric, yet most people are comfortable using grams, kg, metres and cm.
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642

    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    Weak weak weak !

    But what on earth is Corbyn doing opposing progressive taxation !?

    As we all know, Corbyn is profoundly stupid.

    May cowers in the face of the right wing press. Davis is clueless about Brexit. The Conservative party stands on the brink of a major electoral expenses scandal.

    Ed Miliband is the second worst leader Labour has had since WW2. He would be 20% ahead in the polls currently and Labour would still have an MP in Copeland.
    I think 20% might be pushing it. 19% tops.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014
    edited March 2017
    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    It is the perfect example of the media and their love of extremes. They will happily talk about sub zero.temperatures in centigrade but just as happily switch to 90s or 100s Fahrenheit when talking about high temperatures. Anything to make it sound more extreme.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,164
    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    Although I am sceptical of this u turn generally I think she is on the right path, she thinks things through, is calculating and is ready to respect the Brexit vote without going as far as the hardest Brexiteers (despite what some Remoaners on here may think), polling wise she is also in a very strong position and the idea Sir Keith Starmer is Labour's Messiah and if he took over it would be Blair 1997 all over again is absurd, he is not even a Kinnock let alone a Blair. Chuka Ummuna is probably Labour's best bet but he certainly won't run until Labour have lost the next general election
  • Options
    YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    She's not in office to the things that the Left want her to do.
    Oh but you're wrong. She's implementing a key part of Michael Foot's manifesto.
    Very true part of the 1983 labour manifesto is becoming mainstream .Leaving EU,threatening house of lord's nationalising banks .National minimum wage,ban on foxhunting.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,164

    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    Weak weak weak !

    But what on earth is Corbyn doing opposing progressive taxation !?

    As we all know, Corbyn is profoundly stupid.

    May cowers in the face of the right wing press. Davis is clueless about Brexit. The Conservative party stands on the brink of a major electoral expenses scandal.

    Ed Miliband is the second worst leader Labour has had since WW2. He would be 20% ahead in the polls currently and Labour would still have an MP in Copeland.
    Dream on, Ed Miliband would be barely doing better than Corbyn at the moment
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited March 2017
    The MailOnline columnist Katie Hopkins has said it is “very likely” she will challenge a court ruling that she libelled food blogger Jack Monroe on Twitter.

    Monroe was awarded £24,000 in damages last week in a row over tweets suggesting the writer approved of defacing a war memorial during an anti-austerity demonstration in Whitehall.

    Speaking to the BBC’s Media Show on Wednesday, Hopkins said she was satisfied with her behaviour and that the defamation bar on Twitter “was as low as my labia”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/15/katie-hopkins-jack-monroe-libel-ruling-bbc-mailonline

    The Daily Mail must be paying her more than Trump to his gold leaf supplier if she can afford to go for round 2.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,978
    Sean_F said:

    She's not in office to [do] the things that the Left want her to do.

    If I understand correctly, the current government is pursuing a policy of spending more than it earns, leaving free trade areas, devaluing the currency, penalising savers, and letting inflation rise.


  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,970
    Bojabob said:

    Sean_F said:

    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    Virtually everyone uses feet, inches, and pounds. In my experience Fahrenheit is pretty widely used.
    Interesting. As I say, the imperial system in general is indeed widely used – more so than metric, I would say – but the exception to that in my experience is Fahrenheit.

    I use farenheit, until we get a frost.

  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642

    Bojabob said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Daily Express still writing temperatures in Fahrenheit? So out of touch.

    Perhaps when we LEAVE the EU we'll return to using Farenheit? And feet, inches, pounds, etc...?

    ;)
    Lots of people still do use feet, inches and pounds – I do in general conversation. I can honestly say that I haven't heard Fahrenheit spoken of by an Englishman for as long as I can remember. I'd guess that a large proportion of the population would have no idea what 65F was without converting it.
    It is the perfect example of the media and their love of extremes. They will happily talk about sub zero.temperatures in centigrade but just as happily switch to 90s or 100s Fahrenheit when talking about high temperatures. Anything to make it sound more extreme.
    Ha yes. Very true. The subeditor must have been somewhat desperate to use 65F on a newspaper front page, however. "Workers yesterday were forced to leave their winter coats in the wardrobe as temperatures soared to just below normal room temperature."
  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    HYUFD said:

    Bojabob said:

    Scott_P said:
    May melts in face of bad headlines from right wing press. Weak, weak, weak.

    She is an incredibly weak PM. I am now of the view that she has not an original thought, notion or idea of her own. Corbyn is her right-hand man. Without him, she'd be nothing.
    Although I am sceptical of this u turn generally I think she is on the right path, she thinks things through, is calculating and is ready to respect the Brexit vote without going as far as the hardest Brexiteers (despite what some Remoaners on here may think), polling wise she is also in a very strong position and the idea Sir Keith Starmer is Labour's Messiah and if he took over it would be Blair 1997 all over again is absurd, he is not even a Kinnock let alone a Blair. Chuka Ummuna is probably Labour's best bet but he certainly won't run until Labour have lost the next general election
    Sir Keith Starmer is certainly a dark horse. I've not come across him before.
This discussion has been closed.