Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Chances are that following the betting on by-election days won

124»

Comments

  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,886

    hmm

    depends if people can be arsed to vote for him, he has the weakest support base of the lot

    seems a bit of a gobshite

    He's level of committed support is exactly the same as Hamon's which reflects the fact that traditional PS voters are wrestling with their loyalties. As election day approaches, expect Macron's vote to solidify.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,412

    rkrkrk said:

    rkrkrk said:

    John Boehner says republicans will not repeal and replace Obama care....

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/john-boehner-obamacare-republicans-235303

    Unrelated, other than Trump is involved in both, but I don't expect Tillerson to last a year as Sec of State.
    Why don't you expect him to last?
    You think he will quit?
    Quit. He can't get the job done with Trump as far as I can see, and as a CEO of Exxon, he aint gonna put up with that.
    Surely he did... Maybe ten minutes... Of research and realised it would be like that.
    Donald doesn't care about most countries so I imagine Rex will have a free hand in most areas...
  • Hertsmere_PubgoerHertsmere_Pubgoer Posts: 3,476
    edited February 2017


    I must admit that when I made that comment I wasn't thinking about white collar crime, just various people that I've worked with or known socially.
    Edit: buggered up the snipping. This is a response to CF not me trying to put words in her mouth.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,531
    rkrkrk said:

    John Boehner says republicans will not repeal and replace Obama care....

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/john-boehner-obamacare-republicans-235303

    No great surprise there. Despite years of sloganeering about "repeal and replace", an actual plan to replace has not been forthcoming. That leaves just repeal, which means millions lose coverage, and many, many lost votes.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited February 2017
    If the swing is 3% across the whole NW, imagine the NW swing with metro-Manchester and Liverpool removed. It should be enough for the Tories to win.

    Stoke should be safe for Labour.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034



    I must admit that when I made that comment I wasn't thinking about white collar crime, just various people that I've worked with or known socially.
    Edit: buggered up the snipping. This is a response to CF not me trying to put words in her mouth.

    May I put in my bid for knowing the most crooks? After all, I met most of Saddam's regime (save him). ;)
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    Dixie said:

    Brom said:

    Dixie said:

    Update from Copeland: Labour in the pub; Tories smiling like having had a mild orgasm. In Stoke, UKIP incommunicado. I.E., f*cked.

    Your ramping is more obvious than what goes on on the Betfair Forum. I suppose once you've clear out your positions the information will dry up.
    Yep, does sound like Billy Bullshit has got a login.
    I thought this site was about politics and betting. Apologies if passing on information is a bit of a drag. Nobody knows the outcome. I'm just passing it on. I also apologise for knowing senior people in 3 parties who are happy to talk to me. I must ask them to stop. What shall we discuss? The weather?
    No, it's interesting, with all due reservations. Carry on!
  • First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    https://twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,886

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
  • MTimT said:



    I must admit that when I made that comment I wasn't thinking about white collar crime, just various people that I've worked with or known socially.
    Edit: buggered up the snipping. This is a response to CF not me trying to put words in her mouth.

    May I put in my bid for knowing the most crooks? After all, I met most of Saddam's regime (save him). ;)
    Now that's just showing off. Fair point though.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    Implying we've built up zero assets while in the EU. What about that ridiculous egg project in Brussels, don't we own 1/28th of that? :p
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    https://twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    What a tool.
  • First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    https://twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,886

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
  • Our share of EU assets should be in proportion to our contribution.
  • TomsToms Posts: 2,478

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    Yes, the silly bu**ers.
    And they probably render Esquimaux as Eskimos too.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,886

    Our share of EU assets should be in proportion to our contribution.

    They can settle their bill in human capital by not recalling their bankers from the City.
  • RobD said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    Implying we've built up zero assets while in the EU. What about that ridiculous egg project in Brussels, don't we own 1/28th of that? :p
    Last year before the referendum I did point out we'd be supplicants in any Brexit deal.

    https://twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/834828984076627969
  • Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
    The hysteria around comments on Brexit are entirely predictable from both sides. In the end a deal will be done, both the EU and the UK cannot afford not to agree
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148

    RobD said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    Implying we've built up zero assets while in the EU. What about that ridiculous egg project in Brussels, don't we own 1/28th of that? :p
    Last year before the referendum I did point out we'd be supplicants in any Brexit deal.

    twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/834828984076627969
    Yeah, that is the other extreme. No doubt we'll land somewhere in the middle.
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    IF ukip win Stoke......does that mean the liberal media have learnt nothing?
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited February 2017
    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.
  • rkrkrk said:

    Brom said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Brom said:

    Dixie said:

    Update from Copeland: Labour in the pub; Tories smiling like having had a mild orgasm. In Stoke, UKIP incommunicado. I.E., f*cked.

    Your ramping is more obvious than what goes on on the Betfair Forum. I suppose once you've clear out your positions the information will dry up.
    Yep, does sound like Billy Bullshit has got a login.
    His info chimes with George Eaton, Tory, Lib Dem sources regarding Stoke and the local rag in Copeland though........
    Let's be honest it's more likely 1 person has said something and others have run with it and recycled the information. Unless people reveal their source or have a great track record then little is to be believed at this point in the day. We've been here before many, many times.
    This.
    It's like choosing to believe what you hear on transfer deadline day. Just go to bed and wake up the next day (hopefully).
    Certainly my plan. The bets are in, if I try to improve my position after midnight I'll probably just make things worse...
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158

    Our share of EU assets should be in proportion to our contribution.

    They can settle their bill in human capital by not recalling their bankers from the City.
    Now you're being a tool. Bankers don't want to go to sodding Frankfurt...and they don't work for the EU or member governments.
  • First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    Well he would, wouldn’t he.

    EU contributions by member state 2015.

    (3) UK, 12.57%
    (10) Austria, 2.17%
  • RoyalBlue said:

    From what I'm hearing, a lot of people are going to be disappointed.

    Two holds for Labour?
    That will please my bank balance, at least.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    Mistake in that article - Labour actually doubled its majority at the Darlington by election!
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,886
    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    RobD said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    twitter.com/Brexit/status/834815178642436096

    Implying we've built up zero assets while in the EU. What about that ridiculous egg project in Brussels, don't we own 1/28th of that? :p
    Last year before the referendum I did point out we'd be supplicants in any Brexit deal.

    https://twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/834828984076627969
    The problem was the wife never gave him blow jobs anyway and he was the one who cooked the tea every night. No wonder he divorced her. Never should have married her in the first place.
  • Mr. NorthWales, if a modicum of sense prevails, I agree.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148

    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
    $300 and $220mn.. an eye-watering amount of money, I'm sure you'd agree :smiley: (we are on $200mn)
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited February 2017

    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
    The Germans are about €25bn per annum short of the amount they are supposed to be committing to defence spending under the 2% of GDP commitment.

    And, they would be on the hook for €4bn a year of additional contributions to the EU budget if the EU wish to carry on spending as they have without the UK contribution.

    They are just going to have to get used to the idea that the country that provided just over 26% of the net contribution in 2015 is no longer paying for them.
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    RobD said:

    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
    $300 and $220mn.. an eye-watering amount of money, I'm sure you'd agree :smiley: (we are on $200mn)
    We put less into NATO than France or Germany?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148
    notme said:

    RobD said:

    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
    $300 and $220mn.. an eye-watering amount of money, I'm sure you'd agree :smiley: (we are on $200mn)
    We put less into NATO than France or Germany?
    In terms of direct funding, yes.
  • Mr. NorthWales, if a modicum of sense prevails, I agree.

    Reality will click in
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    edited February 2017

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    I think that's American Bloomberg rather than him!

    The language issue is amusing, actually. When Britain withdraws, English will no longer be the first languag eof any EU stte (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic). That means in principle that there will no longer be any official translations into English (which would be very bad news for me personally as a translator), unless Ireland says well, um, actually we do mostly speak English (embarassing).

    In principle this would be a nuisance for countries like Denmark whose politicians are very comfortable in English. And it'd be a big nuisance for business - probably an unofficial inustry in translation would spring up for anything with commercial relevance.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    nunu said:

    IF ukip win Stoke......does that mean the liberal media have learnt nothing?

    The liberal media being?
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited February 2017

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    nunu said:

    IF ukip win Stoke......does that mean the liberal media have learnt nothing?

    The liberal media being?
    She repeats herself. "Media" would have been sufficient.
  • “There has been no problem whatever… with any of the British nationals who have been released from Guantanamo Bay, who, in fact, have made a commendable contribution to arguments for justice and for closing it down.” - Mr J. Corbyn of Islington
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    chestnut said:

    Offset the NATO shortfall from the EU nations.

    The largest share of NATO's direct funding in Europe is from Germany and France. I suppose they can redirect it to EU defence...
    Direct funding lol - those are very small amounts in the scheme of things.

    How many Rafael's will that buy per year?

  • Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    I understand JohnLoony is predicting an 863 vote Labour majority in Copeland.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    I think that's American Bloomberg rather than him!

    The language issue is amusing, actually. When Britain withdraws, English will no longer be the first languag eof any EU stte (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic). That means in principle that there will no longer be any official translations into English (which would be very bad news for me personally as a translator), unless Ireland says well, um, actually we do mostly speak English (embarassing).

    In principle this would be a nuisance for countries like Denmark whose politicians are very comfortable in English. And it'd be a big nuisance for business - probably an unofficial inustry in translation would spring up for anything with commercial relevance.
    This is absolute nonesense. For EU (not domestic) purposes, Ireland's main EU language has been English since 1973. They added Irish in 2007, but not all documents have to be translated into it in recognition that it's a total waste of time and money.

    I also fail to see how the UK leaving would automatically lead to English ceasing to be one of the 3 main working languages. Eastern Europe and the Med would be utterly opposed, as shown by the farrago over the EU patent court.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    rkrkrk said:

    John Boehner says republicans will not repeal and replace Obama care....

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/john-boehner-obamacare-republicans-235303

    I misread that as "John Bercow" to begin with...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148
    edited February 2017

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,838

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
    The hysteria around comments on Brexit are entirely predictable from both sides. In the end a deal will be done, both the EU and the UK cannot afford not to agree
    You're so deluded. They CAN afford it. We can't. Wake up!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
    The hysteria around comments on Brexit are entirely predictable from both sides. In the end a deal will be done, both the EU and the UK cannot afford not to agree
    You're so deluded. They CAN afford it. We can't. Wake up!
    They are the ones with a huge hole in their budget!
  • RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    Con gain Islington North
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148

    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    Con gain Islington North
    Doesn't have the same ring to it...
  • RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    Con gain Islington North
    Doesn't have the same ring to it...
    It does when you remember who the Labour MP for Islington North is.

    This is all very reminiscent of the Cleggasm, and one or two deluded Lib Dems thought they had a chance of gaining Witney!
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Con gain Scotland?
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,838
    edited February 2017
    RobD said:

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
    The hysteria around comments on Brexit are entirely predictable from both sides. In the end a deal will be done, both the EU and the UK cannot afford not to agree
    You're so deluded. They CAN afford it. We can't. Wake up!
    They are the ones with a huge hole in their budget!
    They have a hole in their budget, whether they do a deal with us or not. And 27 states to share it around.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    alex. said:

    Con gain Scotland?

    Three seats there I think.
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    alex. said:

    Con gain Scotland?

    Only the warm, dry, sunny bits.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,766
    edited February 2017
    I have had a shit week this week: I was working late on Job One every day and I was freelancing last night until 4am, so not in good mood. I have done no work wrt Stoke or Copeland and I have no idea who will win. As I have no position to hedge (it's not going to move GBP) and I have no idea who's going to win, there's no point in betting. So I won't be betting on Stoke/Copeland, so apologies for being the wussiest wussy wuss that ever wussed. I hope you all win money tonight.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,830
    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    East Ham
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Pulpstar said:

    alex. said:

    Con gain Scotland?

    Three seats there I think.
    Gain Scotland, not gain in Scotland
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    Meeks gains Acceptance
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,830

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic).
    Ha. I imagine the response was "...sure you do". translated into 20 languages.
  • midwintermidwinter Posts: 1,112
    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Do you remember the stoke central byelection? When the tories actually had a chance of winning in the industrial heartlands?"

    I'm calling peak PB tory.

    It's unlikely to get better than this for the blue team.
    Nonsense.

    Con gain Bootle if the blues take Copeland tonight by 4,000
    If Con gain Bootle, what will be the new "Con gain Bootle"? :o
    Brussels
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Apparently Sky News's election show will be based in Stoke tonight, not Copeland as someone implied earlier.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    AndyJS said:

    Apparently Sky News's election show will be based in Stoke tonight, not Copeland as someone implied earlier.

    @BethRigby: One train, one car, eight hours later, we've #MadeittoCopeland. Join us for our special by-election coverage with @adamboultonSKY from 10pm
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Scott_P said:

    AndyJS said:

    Apparently Sky News's election show will be based in Stoke tonight, not Copeland as someone implied earlier.

    @BethRigby: One train, one car, eight hours later, we've #MadeittoCopeland. Join us for our special by-election coverage with @adamboultonSKY from 10pm
    Bit of a conflict of information, in that case.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    RoyalBlue said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    I think that's American Bloomberg rather than him!

    The language issue is amusing, actually. When Britain withdraws, English will no longer be the first languag eof any EU stte (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic). That means in principle that there will no longer be any official translations into English (which would be very bad news for me personally as a translator), unless Ireland says well, um, actually we do mostly speak English (embarassing).

    In principle this would be a nuisance for countries like Denmark whose politicians are very comfortable in English. And it'd be a big nuisance for business - probably an unofficial inustry in translation would spring up for anything with commercial relevance.
    This is absolute nonesense. For EU (not domestic) purposes, Ireland's main EU language has been English since 1973. They added Irish in 2007, but not all documents have to be translated into it in recognition that it's a total waste of time and money.

    Not for long. Irish will be used for ALL EU documents from 2021:

    http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370204.htm

    On the wider issue, there's a discussion here:

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/european-commission-rejects-claims-english-will-not-be-eu-language-1.2702734 It's pretty clear that English will still be used, but it's possible that it will swap places with Irish and only used for primary legislation. I hope you're right and this won't happen, though.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited February 2017
    I'm still predicting Ukip to come second in Stoke.

    Also still just about sticking to Labour holding Copeland, although possibly chickening out of my prediction of a swing to Lab.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited February 2017
    Scott_P said:


    @BethRigby: One train, one car, eight hours later, we've #MadeittoCopeland. Join us for our special by-election coverage with @adamboultonSKY from 10pm

    AndyJS said:

    Apparently Sky News's election show will be based in Stoke tonight

    FAKE NEWS...just not sure which one.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,830

    RoyalBlue said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    I think that's American Bloomberg rather than him!

    The language issue is amusing, actually. When Britain withdraws, English will no longer be the first languag eof any EU stte (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic). That means in principle that there will no longer be any official translations into English (which would be very bad news for me personally as a translator), unless Ireland says well, um, actually we do mostly speak English (embarassing).

    In principle this would be a nuisance for countries like Denmark whose politicians are very comfortable in English. And it'd be a big nuisance for business - probably an unofficial inustry in translation would spring up for anything with commercial relevance.
    This is absolute nonesense. For EU (not domestic) purposes, Ireland's main EU language has been English since 1973. They added Irish in 2007, but not all documents have to be translated into it in recognition that it's a total waste of time and money.

    Not for long. Irish will be used for ALL EU documents from 2021:

    http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370204.htm

    On the wider issue, there's a discussion here:

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/european-commission-rejects-claims-english-will-not-be-eu-language-1.2702734 It's pretty clear that English will still be used, but it's possible that it will swap places with Irish and only used for primary legislation. I hope you're right and this won't happen, though.
    Given how widely it is used as a second language, how can it make any sense to not translate things into English even if the Irish are going to pretend it is not their main language? It would be a chance with no benefits, surely?
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    RobD said:

    Is that all - why not ask for 100 billion. The idea we will pay blackmail sums to leave is only for remainers dreamland

    The idea is that the Brexiteers will call them all 'tools', the negotiations go nowhere, and the dream of the German car industry imposing a velvet divorce with lots of goodies for Britain will be exposed as a fantasy.
    The hysteria around comments on Brexit are entirely predictable from both sides. In the end a deal will be done, both the EU and the UK cannot afford not to agree
    You're so deluded. They CAN afford it. We can't. Wake up!
    They are the ones with a huge hole in their budget!
    They have a hole in their budget, whether they do a deal with us or not. And 27 states to share it around.
    Many of the 27 make zero contribution to the EU budget, do not meet their defence spending obligations and are negligible trade partners for us.
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464
    kle4 said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    First EU head of state/government to publicly back to €60bn Brexit bill figure.

    To add insult to injury he calls it a 'check'. The common language of the EU will be American.
    I think that's American Bloomberg rather than him!

    The language issue is amusing, actually. When Britain withdraws, English will no longer be the first languag eof any EU stte (Ireland decided to go nqationalist and claim they only spoke Gaelic). That means in principle that there will no longer be any official translations into English (which would be very bad news for me personally as a translator), unless Ireland says well, um, actually we do mostly speak English (embarassing).

    In principle this would be a nuisance for countries like Denmark whose politicians are very comfortable in English. And it'd be a big nuisance for business - probably an unofficial inustry in translation would spring up for anything with commercial relevance.
    This is absolute nonesense. For EU (not domestic) purposes, Ireland's main EU language has been English since 1973. They added Irish in 2007, but not all documents have to be translated into it in recognition that it's a total waste of time and money.

    Not for long. Irish will be used for ALL EU documents from 2021:

    http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370204.htm

    On the wider issue, there's a discussion here:

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/european-commission-rejects-claims-english-will-not-be-eu-language-1.2702734 It's pretty clear that English will still be used, but it's possible that it will swap places with Irish and only used for primary legislation. I hope you're right and this won't happen, though.
    Given how widely it is used as a second language, how can it make any sense to not translate things into English even if the Irish are going to pretend it is not their main language? It would be a chance with no benefits, surely?
    I've said before India is probably a model. The Raj ended but English didn't primarily one assumes. because it suddenly attained neutral status.
  • dixiedean said:

    rkrkrk said:

    John Boehner says republicans will not repeal and replace Obama care....

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/john-boehner-obamacare-republicans-235303

    No great surprise there. Despite years of sloganeering about "repeal and replace", an actual plan to replace has not been forthcoming. That leaves just repeal, which means millions lose coverage, and many, many lost votes.
    Recent Town Hall events have been brutal for the GOP - I saw some of Tom Cotton's TH in Arkansas last night. People are very angry about the ACA. Midterms approaching.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Continued use of English by the EU after Brexit would presumably be cultural appropriation, if done without our permission. We should charge a licence fee of, oooh, £365m a week if they want to keep it.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,148
    New thread!
  • viewcode said:

    I have had a shit week this week: I was working late on Job One every day and I was freelancing last night until 4am, so not in good mood. I have done no work wrt Stoke or Copeland and I have no idea who will win. As I have no position to hedge (it's not going to move GBP) and I have no idea who's going to win, there's no point in betting. So I won't be betting on Stoke/Copeland, so apologies for being the wussiest wussy wuss that ever wussed. I hope you all win money tonight.

    Oh dear, sorry to hear of your woes. Wuss away!!
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    AndyJS said:

    I understand JohnLoony is predicting an 863 vote Labour majority in Copeland.

    I think he predicted 650 Con MP's in the last GE. I think he probably forgot the Speaker...
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658

    dixiedean said:

    rkrkrk said:

    John Boehner says republicans will not repeal and replace Obama care....

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/john-boehner-obamacare-republicans-235303

    No great surprise there. Despite years of sloganeering about "repeal and replace", an actual plan to replace has not been forthcoming. That leaves just repeal, which means millions lose coverage, and many, many lost votes.
    Recent Town Hall events have been brutal for the GOP - I saw some of Tom Cotton's TH in Arkansas last night. People are very angry about the ACA. Midterms approaching.
    It appears that people really didn't realise that Obamacare WAS the ACA. Which politiically is obviously what the opponents wanted when the coined the term. They should probably just declare Obamacare "dead" and leave the ACA in place!
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,766

    viewcode said:

    I have had a shit week this week: I was working late on Job One every day and I was freelancing last night until 4am, so not in good mood. I have done no work wrt Stoke or Copeland and I have no idea who will win. As I have no position to hedge (it's not going to move GBP) and I have no idea who's going to win, there's no point in betting. So I won't be betting on Stoke/Copeland, so apologies for being the wussiest wussy wuss that ever wussed. I hope you all win money tonight.

    Oh dear, sorry to hear of your woes. Wuss away!!
    Thank you
  • NEW THREAD

  • Or then again it might....
This discussion has been closed.