politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » There could be double trouble for the markets if Trump does manage to win
At the moment, it looks like Hillary Clinton is firmly priced-in to be the next President and that might be a reasonable assumption. However, the markets appear to be far too complacent with regards to the risk of Donald Trump becoming President.
Second like Remain. Thanks Adam (regular poster under another name?) for the insight, I agree that the 5/1 is too long in a two horse race, but Hillary is the favourite in a contest that either of them could still throw away with less than a fortnight to go.
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
No expertise but 15% sounds fine for a shock effect, would be surprised if it lasted.
Other polls this week had Trump ahead in Arizona but I expect it to be close there, the West will be Trump's weakest region relative to 2012 because of Hispanics
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
No expertise but 15% sounds fine for a shock effect, would be surprised if it lasted.
How did the German stock market do in the aftermath of Hitler's election?
Thank you for the piece, Adam. Plenty of opportunity for others who whinge about the editorial content or tone of the forum to put up their own contribution.
The prudent trader or punter will have ensured by now they are as green as possible on all outcomes. Nonetheless is the 5/1 a fair reflection of the weight of money in the book on the other runner ? If this were a handicap for 3-y-o of all ages, HRC would be 1/7 or 2/13 to ensure the bookie cops a small profit.
In all honesty, if you think HRC is going to win and you have £70k behind the sofa, there are worse opportunities to make that a quick £77k - it's not like a 3 mile novice chase at Catterick with 18 fences in the way.
State betting, like constituency betting here, is fine if you know what's going on but states are big places and often quite polarised between GOP and Dem counties. The keen observer may see an error in the betting that we can't from 3000+ miles away with only polls and social media to help.
There's plenty of evidence the financial markets will take a hit if Trump prevails - the uncertain or the unexpected tends to do that. Sterling may well strengthen a little against the greenback but the FTSE will follow the DJIA if that takes a tumble as investors get jittery.
Longer term, there are some interesting nuggets in Trump's programme though the devil will be in the detail. Curiously, my sense of him is that behind the bluster, he's less of a conservative and more of a moderate Republican than might be expected. He will need rapidly to find an accommodation with the media though he will have the benefit that large parts of it will be in a state of shock at the outcome.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
An Apple product that is ridiculously expensive ?
Well colour me shocked..
Is the UK savings rate so low because people buy this overpriced guff ?
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
No expertise but 15% sounds fine for a shock effect, would be surprised if it lasted.
How did the German stock market do in the aftermath of Hitler's election?
(*Ducks*)
I hope the US news networks have booked the expert in such matters, Ken Livingstone, on the off chance...
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
Sounds like yet another case of us Brits being ripped off by U.S. companies, where historically $ selling price there = £ selling price here ..... that said, there not much difference at present!
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
Yes, they're way overpriced (even in dollars, before they put in a currency adjustment). The trusty '12 MPB will be getting an upgrade rather than a replacement for Christmas.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
Totally agree. The last time the MacBooks had a major upgrade they didn't have so much competition. It's harder to justify the price premium when Microsoft, HP, Dell and Lenovo all have equally good or better products.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
If that 15% figure is right, then with the polls showing Trump having an approx 1 in 6 or 16% chance of winning, it must surely follow that the S&P 500 should correspondingly leap by around 2.4% if and when Hillary is confirmed as the POTUS winner.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
I think he means "using the fall in the pound as an excuse for their profiteering"...
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
A 21% increase ...... there's an opportunistic degree of rounding involved there methinks (if you can call the pricing of something at £1,499 "rounding").
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
No expertise but 15% sounds fine for a shock effect, would be surprised if it lasted.
How did the German stock market do in the aftermath of Hitler's election?
(*Ducks*)
How did the German market (markets?) do, say 1933-1935?
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
A 21% increase ...... there's an opportunistic degree of rounding involved there methinks (if you can call the pricing of something at £1,499 "rounding").
The pound hasn't fallen 21% from peak, and the price wasn't last set at the peak...
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
No expertise but 15% sounds fine for a shock effect, would be surprised if it lasted.
How did the German stock market do in the aftermath of Hitler's election?
(*Ducks*)
How did the German market (markets?) do, say 1933-1935?
DAVID L WHERE ARE YOU ??? LOOK AT THE SCORE>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Been listening to TMS while driving. Brilliant bowling by Stokes and Ali. Is this a good score still? I suspect it might be but we are back in the game big time.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
A 21% increase ...... there's an opportunistic degree of rounding involved there methinks (if you can call the pricing of something at £1,499 "rounding").
The pound hasn't fallen 21% from peak, and the price wasn't last set at the peak...
No point moaning about the company's pricing - if you devalue your currency and create an inflationary environment then these sort of things are bound to happen. Economic forces are ethically neutral.
DAVID L WHERE ARE YOU ??? LOOK AT THE SCORE>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Been listening to TMS while driving. Brilliant bowling by Stokes and Ali. Is this a good score still? I suspect it might be but we are back in the game big time.
Betfair's England price of 1.77 suggests that the Banglas haven't scored enough.
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
If that 15% figure is right, then with the polls showing Trump having an approx 1 in 6 or 16% chance of winning, it must surely follow that the S&P 500 should correspondingly leap by around 2.4% if and when Hillary is confirmed as the POTUS winner.
If I were invested in the US market, I would be heavily backing Trump as a hedge against a possible 15% drop in my holdings.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
And there are the expats dealing with a 30% increase in living costs (no sympathy at all from the Brexiters)- I could get over 1.43 to the Euro a year ago/ now its down to about 1.08 (on my exchange).
But surely we are living in some parallel multiverse....yesterdays economic news, a slowdown in growth, and the continuation of Nissan- they all seem to be put through the prism of Brexit crapness whereby anything that isn't that crap is viewed as a resounding success for Brexit.
If remain had won I doubt very much we would have all been creaming our undies on slowing growth rates of 0.5%, or Nissans continuation of the NE contract.
Meanwhile the exchange rate is shocking, stagflation is coming, business investment is stalling, the deficit is increasing, the current account increasing....we are eight years from the last economic shock....and after Nissan yesterday we have shown just how open we are to blackmail from industry and the EU because of Brexit.
I don't think we could have picked a worse time to put us through the uncertainty of Brexit....when (not if) the next economic shock hits us....it'll be tough.
Michael Crick @MichaelLCrick 6m6 minutes ago Corbyn alleged to have told colleagues peerage for Chakrabarti wld get round paying her for anti-semitism inquiry
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
While this is not a forecast, I believe some commentators have suggested that the S&P500 would be down c. 15% in a Trump win scenario. The US Dollar would decline against the Euro, Sterling, etc. I suspect European markets would probably fall a similar amount.
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
If that 15% figure is right, then with the polls showing Trump having an approx 1 in 6 or 16% chance of winning, it must surely follow that the S&P 500 should correspondingly leap by around 2.4% if and when Hillary is confirmed as the POTUS winner.
If I were invested in the US market, I would be heavily backing Trump as a hedge against a possible 15% drop in my holdings.
I did that with Brexit....but it made me sick to my stomach heavily backing something I found so terrible for the country, so I cashed out and made a currency transfer 2 days before the vote. I got the Euro at about 1.32.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
You're not just paying for the hardware, one of the reasons I go for macs is no blue screen of death.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
Yes, pretty much the same as they are asking in dollars for the rest of the world.
You also need this essential accessory to make it work properly
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
Michael Crick @MichaelLCrick 6m6 minutes ago Corbyn alleged to have told colleagues peerage for Chakrabarti wld get round paying her for anti-semitism inquiry
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
You're not just paying for the hardware, one of the reasons I go for macs is no blue screen of death.
No, when a Mac crashes you get a brief flash of the TV test card before a long reboot.
DAVID L WHERE ARE YOU ??? LOOK AT THE SCORE>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Been listening to TMS while driving. Brilliant bowling by Stokes and Ali. Is this a good score still? I suspect it might be but we are back in the game big time.
Betfair's England price of 1.77 suggests that the Banglas haven't scored enough.
Hmm...if Moeem can make the ball turn like this we need to think about what the BD spinners can do. And England bats last. They may be demoralised, especially if they roll over now for 250 but I suspect our top order are in for a difficult couple of sessions.
@EdConwaySky: Last night Apple quietly raised the UK prices of its computers to reflect the fall in the pound. So a 4K iMac that was £1,199 is now £1,449
A 21% increase ...... there's an opportunistic degree of rounding involved there methinks (if you can call the pricing of something at £1,499 "rounding").
The pound hasn't fallen 21% from peak, and the price wasn't last set at the peak...
No point moaning about the company's pricing - if you devalue your currency and create an inflationary environment then these sort of things are bound to happen. Economic forces are ethically neutral.
Oh, I'm not moaning. Apple are going to profiteer, that's what they do.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
You're not just paying for the hardware, one of the reasons I go for macs is no blue screen of death.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
Apple rely on people like me who just buy their products, and not particularly price sensitive.I've got a three year Pro and want to upgrade. I'm going to New York in a couple of weeks so I'll buy there.
I haven't seen.....but has there been any iPad upgrade this autumn?
I don't think we could have picked a worse time to put us through the uncertainty of Brexit....when (not if) the next economic shock hits us....it'll be tough.
We've learned since Brexit that the EU is a prison and they'll try to make you suffer if you dare to leave. The penalty for apostasy is death. Brussels remains unwaveringly committed to its project of turning Europe into the U.S.E. - whether or not the peoples of Europe want that. If we had voted remain we would have been committing ourselves, unrecoverably, to becoming part of a U.S.E. We saved ourselves at the 11th hour, having been outrageously denied a vote on the core question for 40 years. We may also have saved others by doing so. The EU is failing. Failing badly. We unquestionably made the right call.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
Yes, pretty much the same as they are asking in dollars for the rest of the world.
You also need this essential accessory to make it work properly
And if you get the latest iPhone 7, and the latest MacBook Pro, there's no out of the box way to connect the two together. They want an extra £25 for a USB-C to lightning cable.
You also need this essential accessory to make it work properly
Care to elaborate?
Apple removed the ESC key from the latest MBP line up, one of the most important keys on the keyboard if you are a software developer, one of their most important markets.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
You're not just paying for the hardware, one of the reasons I go for macs is no blue screen of death.
Wouldn't a coke habit be cheaper ?
We have regular, random drug tests at work, though I do know when they are happening.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
They're A THOUSAND POUNDS CHEAPER - 1,500 vs 2,500 - on a like-for-like basis.
You're not just paying for the hardware, one of the reasons I go for macs is no blue screen of death.
No, when a Mac crashes you get a brief flash of the TV test card before a long reboot.
3 years or so ago I bought a good spec pro to replace my Apple laptop. When it crashed for the first time I was sooooooooooo disappointed x 10.
On topic, I'm far from convinced by the parallels being drawn with either the EURef or GE2015.
In the former, the betting markets seemed to be completely out of line with the polling, which had the referendum on a knife-edge. Certainly, those polls that had Remain ahead in the final days after Jo Cox's death tended to do so by more on average than those which had Leave ahead, and there did look to have been a swing back to Remain. Also, undecideds tend to break for the status quo or the safe option. But there were also big questions over how reliable the methodology was for a one-off vote where the turnout was hard to gauge and where there were few analogue polls to learn from. Leave at something like 6/4 on the day would have been much more rational.
In the latter, there were plenty of straws in the wind that the Tories might do well, from the down-survey questions on leadership and economic trustworthiness to the less-than-overwhelming by-election results to the scale of the Tory efforts in the Lib Dem seats (and the scale of the Lib Dem collapse in polling vote share) to the Tories being the 'safe' option.
In the US, Trump is not the safe option, he is behind in the polls, he seems to have a ceiling at 44%, which is too low; his ratings with too many demographics is terrible even given Hillary's own poor ratings; and the pollsters are working with a known quantity so ought to be fairly accurate, and given that the state-level polling broadly matches the picture from the national-level, the likelihood is that it is.
None of which is to say that Trump can't win. It is, however, to say that if the election were held today he wouldn't win.
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
When did ESC last actually do anything other than (in some applications) exit full screen?
Michael Crick @MichaelLCrick 6m6 minutes ago Corbyn alleged to have told colleagues peerage for Chakrabarti wld get round paying her for anti-semitism inquiry
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
When did ESC last actually do anything other than (in some applications) exit full screen?
The Bangers vs England...it's just not a fair fight. Maybe a sign of things to come when we start our negotiations with 27 Countries, the biggest trading block the world has ever produced and hope to come out with something..
By the way, is it my imagination or are the new MacBook Pros completely, absurdly, ridiculously expensive? Two and a half thousand pounds for the 15 inch model; that's a grand more than a similarly spec'ed Surface Book. (And that includes a free Xbox One.)
No escape key. But Microsoft has recently announced some very, very expensive Surface laptops aimed at the graphics market.
28" display with 13.5 million pixels at a 4500x3000 resolution 2TB "rapid" hard drive 32GB RAM, quad-core Skylake CPU, Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M GPU with 4GB of VRAM, an integrated "2.1 surround" speaker system, a rear-facing 10MP camera, and a Windows Hello-compatible front-facing 5MP camera
Comments
:phew:
on-topic:
Great analysis; minor risk-event. Don't think the in-house circus will understand it though.
:thanks:
Clinton 48 .. Trump 46
https://www.scribd.com/document/329155539/Saguaro-Strategies-General-Election-Survey-October-22-24
Longer-term, if Trump follows a fiscal expansion path, one might suppose that infrastructure companies would benefit from spending. Oil & gas companies would benefit from Trump being more pro-drilling... but, more drilling means a lower oil price, so it's by no means clear that sector would perform particularly well.
Anyway, we'll see...
Clinton 42 .. Trump 47
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/trump-leads-clinton-blunt-kander-a-virtual-tie-in-missouri/article_a4a48a47-485f-5e9a-b6f6-1dba7c7deb48.html
(*Ducks*)
.................................................
Quite so. The early voting in the state is presently very good for Clinton. She has also moved resources into the state from Nevada.
POTUS Countdown (24 hr changes)
Sporting Index ECV Mid-Spreads:
Clinton 329 (-2) Trump 207 (+2)
538.com ECV Predictions:
Clinton 328 (-10) Trump 209 (+10)
There's a quick 5% return on backing Iqbal as the highest Bangla 1st innings scorer if anyone wants it?
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303167-how-does-trump-get-to-270
Thank you for the piece, Adam. Plenty of opportunity for others who whinge about the editorial content or tone of the forum to put up their own contribution.
The prudent trader or punter will have ensured by now they are as green as possible on all outcomes. Nonetheless is the 5/1 a fair reflection of the weight of money in the book on the other runner ? If this were a handicap for 3-y-o of all ages, HRC would be 1/7 or 2/13 to ensure the bookie cops a small profit.
In all honesty, if you think HRC is going to win and you have £70k behind the sofa, there are worse opportunities to make that a quick £77k - it's not like a 3 mile novice chase at Catterick with 18 fences in the way.
State betting, like constituency betting here, is fine if you know what's going on but states are big places and often quite polarised between GOP and Dem counties. The keen observer may see an error in the betting that we can't from 3000+ miles away with only polls and social media to help.
There's plenty of evidence the financial markets will take a hit if Trump prevails - the uncertain or the unexpected tends to do that. Sterling may well strengthen a little against the greenback but the FTSE will follow the DJIA if that takes a tumble as investors get jittery.
Longer term, there are some interesting nuggets in Trump's programme though the devil will be in the detail. Curiously, my sense of him is that behind the bluster, he's less of a conservative and more of a moderate Republican than might be expected. He will need rapidly to find an accommodation with the media though he will have the benefit that large parts of it will be in a state of shock at the outcome.
Well colour me shocked..
Is the UK savings rate so low because people buy this overpriced guff ?
Full video of first focus group of Lab-UKIP switchers now up (90 mins): https://t.co/fpWAwophXl (second to follow soon)
IF (big if!) they can get their sh1t together and stop the infighting for a couple of years.
http://www.politicspa.com/realclearpolitics-moves-pa-to-toss-up-status/79563/
"We're gonna build an autobahn."
New #AshcroftInAmerica podcast with @JoeNBC, @KSoltisAnderson, @jonathandarman and the voters of Miami and Tampa: https://t.co/bd56JPcRt7
Also worth noting Trump has never led any polls there.
But surely we are living in some parallel multiverse....yesterdays economic news, a slowdown in growth, and the continuation of Nissan- they all seem to be put through the prism of Brexit crapness whereby anything that isn't that crap is viewed as a resounding success for Brexit.
If remain had won I doubt very much we would have all been creaming our undies on slowing growth rates of 0.5%, or Nissans continuation of the NE contract.
Meanwhile the exchange rate is shocking, stagflation is coming, business investment is stalling, the deficit is increasing, the current account increasing....we are eight years from the last economic shock....and after Nissan yesterday we have shown just how open we are to blackmail from industry and the EU because of Brexit.
I don't think we could have picked a worse time to put us through the uncertainty of Brexit....when (not if) the next economic shock hits us....it'll be tough.
Apols: Leo Sayer. Please fill the gaps.
Well everybody knows as Ladbrookes knows,
A bet is only good as you start.
Your number two leaves too early,
But your oppo helps with the start.
You find a nice score and settle right in,
Your bat playing the ball.
But then Mooen has me shuffling along,
And the batting begins to close.
:chorus:
Well I'm a one man Bang
LaDeshi batsman called Tamim.
Is there anybody out there want to lend me a hand
With my one man band.
For too often I've been fighting alone,
Against a bowling attack so thin.
And soon my caps won't be large enough
To stop me twenty-twentying.
So hey there India don't you look so sad
Don't look so ill at ease,
Well I can play for any team you like
To cheer up the life I should lead.
:repeat-chorus:
Corbyn alleged to have told colleagues peerage for Chakrabarti wld get round paying her for anti-semitism inquiry
http://heatst.com/world/jeremy-corbyn-and-shami-chakrabarti-accused-of-massive-stitch-up-over-peerage/
You also need this essential accessory to make it work properly
I'll issue a forecast every few days but it'll not have the bottom of the last two elections.
Here's my latest emission :
Clinton 358 .. Trump 180
http://www.270towin.com/maps/dov9v
https://twitter.com/pandocruises/status/791367794118057984
I haven't seen.....but has there been any iPad upgrade this autumn?
I don't think we could have picked a worse time to put us through the uncertainty of Brexit....when (not if) the next economic shock hits us....it'll be tough.
We've learned since Brexit that the EU is a prison and they'll try to make you suffer if you dare to leave. The penalty for apostasy is death. Brussels remains unwaveringly committed to its project of turning Europe into the U.S.E. - whether or not the peoples of Europe want that. If we had voted remain we would have been committing ourselves, unrecoverably, to becoming part of a U.S.E. We saved ourselves at the 11th hour, having been outrageously denied a vote on the core question for 40 years. We may also have saved others by doing so. The EU is failing. Failing badly. We unquestionably made the right call.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/10/microsoft-announces-surface-studio-all-in-one-touchscreen-pc/
In the former, the betting markets seemed to be completely out of line with the polling, which had the referendum on a knife-edge. Certainly, those polls that had Remain ahead in the final days after Jo Cox's death tended to do so by more on average than those which had Leave ahead, and there did look to have been a swing back to Remain. Also, undecideds tend to break for the status quo or the safe option. But there were also big questions over how reliable the methodology was for a one-off vote where the turnout was hard to gauge and where there were few analogue polls to learn from. Leave at something like 6/4 on the day would have been much more rational.
In the latter, there were plenty of straws in the wind that the Tories might do well, from the down-survey questions on leadership and economic trustworthiness to the less-than-overwhelming by-election results to the scale of the Tory efforts in the Lib Dem seats (and the scale of the Lib Dem collapse in polling vote share) to the Tories being the 'safe' option.
In the US, Trump is not the safe option, he is behind in the polls, he seems to have a ceiling at 44%, which is too low; his ratings with too many demographics is terrible even given Hillary's own poor ratings; and the pollsters are working with a known quantity so ought to be fairly accurate, and given that the state-level polling broadly matches the picture from the national-level, the likelihood is that it is.
None of which is to say that Trump can't win. It is, however, to say that if the election were held today he wouldn't win.
28" display with 13.5 million pixels at a 4500x3000 resolution
2TB "rapid" hard drive
32GB RAM,
quad-core Skylake CPU,
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M GPU with 4GB of VRAM,
an integrated "2.1 surround" speaker system,
a rear-facing 10MP camera,
and a Windows Hello-compatible front-facing 5MP camera