Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbyn goes to war with the PLP yet again

12346»

Comments

  • Options

    RobD said:

    The charity Citizens UK, who drew up the list of venerable ‘children’ are a laughing stock.

    Yep, but I am guessing nothing will happen because of it.
    But sources told the BBC that it is extremely unlikely any would then be returned to Calais as they would be able to claim asylum in the UK regardless of the age.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37687916

    The message of the system is sending out is clear, lie through your teeth and you will be rewarded...It should be that those in most need, that play by the rules, are the ones that are prioritized.
    I can't think of a better way to wind people up and get them supporting the hardest Brexit possible though. Good ol' BBC
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    diddums.

    Irish patriots = noble freedom fighters

    British patriots = racist scum
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    chestnut said:

    I'm in the 20% and these numbers are going to get worse for Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/benatipsosmori/status/788774885497663488

    What 20%?

    Only 8% are dissatisfied.

    The 20% of Tory voters who don't think Theresa May who didn't say the mandateless Mrs May isn't the dog's dangly bits.
    I wouldn't count 12% who don't express an opinion as being favourable or otherwise really.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006

    IanB2 said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm...I have commented a few times that the collapse of UKIP gave May a chance to really clean up but I must expect that I did not expect it to happen so quickly.

    Like others I remain bemused that in such a bipolar world there still seems to be so little room for the Lib Dems.

    In light of the Brexit referendum result, must admit to being a tad surprised the LibDems have not benefited more in VI polls from being the most pro EU party. - If it hasn’t materialised in the first 3 months, I doubt it will happen at all.
    I'm not surprised at all. I would imagine that the EU question was never a prime motivator for most of the electorate in terms of which party they chose to back, and almost everyone for whom it was critical backed the Leave side.

    The idea that there is a large poll of Continuity Remain voters out there to be mopped up by the most overtly Europhile party is almost certainly a myth.
    You are probably right. Nevertheless if Brexit goes sour there will be a lot of Remain voters (and probably some moderate leave voters as well) reconsidering whether the Tories deserve their support next time.
    ....The Lib Dems are not suitable. Their activist base wants them to be centre left, at a time when that position in politics - not just in the UK, but in much of the rest of Europe - is collapsing.
    Not so. The neo-liberal consensus is collapsing. It has been centre stage - austerity, unregulated free markets, private good/ public bad. But this is in retreat.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006

    Scott_P said:
    diddums.

    Are the Irish Government going to get Mr Adams and his friends to undecommission the weapons put out of use if we ignore them?

    If they are not careful they will end up with a UK version of Mr Trumps Wall snaking across Ulster. That will do wonders for the Republics economy.
    Careful
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073
    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,147
    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Let's hope the other 70% stay at home to make jam.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073

    Scott_P said:
    diddums.

    Are the Irish Government going to get Mr Adams and his friends to undecommission the weapons put out of use if we ignore them?

    If they are not careful they will end up with a UK version of Mr Trumps Wall snaking across Ulster. That will do wonders for the Republics economy.
    The Northern Irish economy is a lot more dependent on the Republic, than the other way around.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    taffys said:

    diddums.

    Irish patriots = noble freedom fighters

    British patriots = racist scum

    Correction - ENGLISH patriots = racist scum. You can be anyone, from anywhere, be proud of it, all around the world, but you cannot be English (or possibly an Israeli) and a nationalist without being a foaming lunatic. Actually, let's narrow it down further - a white, English male.

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    Scott_P said:
    And here we are helping vulnerable bachelors instead....
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,079

    RobD said:

    Off-topic:

    Sadly, it looks as though the US is still the only country/group that has been able to successfully land and communicate from Mars.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37707776

    Surprised the Russians didn't have a successful mission.
    One lasted for about 15 seconds before it went kaput.
    The Russians did land several landers on Venus. They only lasted a short period, but given Venus's evil atmosphere, that was still good going.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera

    AIUI, Mars is the hardest rocky body in the solar system to perform a landing on. When a body is airless, you can use retrorockets. When it has a thick atmosphere like Earth or Venus, you can aerobrake and use parachutes. Mars' atmosphere is too thin to easily aerobrake, and parachutes have limited potential. Yet the atmosphere is thick enough to cause retrorockets problems. That's why Curiosity was lowered to the surface using a weird 'Sky Crane'.
  • Options
    Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Barnesian said:

    IanB2 said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm...I have commented a few times that the collapse of UKIP gave May a chance to really clean up but I must expect that I did not expect it to happen so quickly.

    Like others I remain bemused that in such a bipolar world there still seems to be so little room for the Lib Dems.

    In light of the Brexit referendum result, must admit to being a tad surprised the LibDems have not benefited more in VI polls from being the most pro EU party. - If it hasn’t materialised in the first 3 months, I doubt it will happen at all.
    I'm not surprised at all. I would imagine that the EU question was never a prime motivator for most of the electorate in terms of which party they chose to back, and almost everyone for whom it was critical backed the Leave side.

    The idea that there is a large poll of Continuity Remain voters out there to be mopped up by the most overtly Europhile party is almost certainly a myth.
    You are probably right. Nevertheless if Brexit goes sour there will be a lot of Remain voters (and probably some moderate leave voters as well) reconsidering whether the Tories deserve their support next time.
    ....The Lib Dems are not suitable. Their activist base wants them to be centre left, at a time when that position in politics - not just in the UK, but in much of the rest of Europe - is collapsing.
    Not so. The neo-liberal consensus is collapsing. It has been centre stage - austerity, unregulated free markets, private good/ public bad. But this is in retreat.
    Correct up to a point. Small state rhetoric and unfettered capitalism is out of fashion, but where are people looking for solutions? Moderate opinion is moving towards May's populist conservatism, whereas more radical voters prefer Jeremy Corbyn. There is little appetite evident for a resurgence of the centre-left, and most voters remain invested in capitalism.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    @OliverCooper: New Ipsos-MORI poll shows the Conservatives destroying Labour and UKIP:

    Conservatives 47% (+7)
    Labour 29% (-5)
    LDs 7% (+1)
    UKIP 6% (-3)

    Those changes!
    Good old Bouncy MORI.
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    And here we are helping vulnerable bachelors instead....

    you can tell by the smirks on the faces of those guys, they cannot believe how stupid we are.
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:
    And here we are helping vulnerable bachelors instead....
    We should spend some of our vast overseas aid budget on safety razors and re-chargeable shavers for the inconvenienced men roughing it in Calais. Alternatively have the Scouts adult Network members (aged 18–25) setup a recruitment unit in Calais.
  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    It ain't over till it's over...

    But you can cash out now for £7.50 if you like.
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,940
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    One interesting feature of this bye-election is the number of people saying 'I'm voting for Liz.' No-one says 'I'm voting for Robert.' It reminds me of Greenwich - 'I'm voting for Rosie.'
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,006

    Barnesian said:

    IanB2 said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm...I have commented a few times that the collapse of UKIP gave May a chance to really clean up but I must expect that I did not expect it to happen so quickly.

    Like others I remain bemused that in such a bipolar world there still seems to be so little room for the Lib Dems.

    In light of the Brexit referendum result, must admit to being a tad surprised the LibDems have not benefited more in VI polls from being the most pro EU party. - If it hasn’t materialised in the first 3 months, I doubt it will happen at all.
    I'm not surprised at all. I would imagine that the EU question was never a prime motivator for most of the electorate in terms of which party they chose to back, and almost everyone for whom it was critical backed the Leave side.

    The idea that there is a large poll of Continuity Remain voters out there to be mopped up by the most overtly Europhile party is almost certainly a myth.
    You are probably right. Nevertheless if Brexit goes sour there will be a lot of Remain voters (and probably some moderate leave voters as well) reconsidering whether the Tories deserve their support next time.
    ....The Lib Dems are not suitable. Their activist base wants them to be centre left, at a time when that position in politics - not just in the UK, but in much of the rest of Europe - is collapsing.
    Not so. The neo-liberal consensus is collapsing. It has been centre stage - austerity, unregulated free markets, private good/ public bad. But this is in retreat.
    Correct up to a point. Small state rhetoric and unfettered capitalism is out of fashion, but where are people looking for solutions? Moderate opinion is moving towards May's populist conservatism, whereas more radical voters prefer Jeremy Corbyn. There is little appetite evident for a resurgence of the centre-left, and most voters remain invested in capitalism.
    The Centre Left position is a mixed economy with the benefits of capitalism in encouraging innovation and efficiency (but with its excesses restrained by competition laws etc,) and public ownership of monopoly infrastructure which are of strategic importance and where competition cannot operate effectively.

    A majority of the UK public are in favour of public ownership of the railways (and possibly of other utilities) and are against the excesses of capitalism (obscene rewards to top management).

    That is a centre left position that I think is quite attractive. I wouldn't say that a centre left position is "collapsing".
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,672
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    My bet was on the LibDems saving their deposit!!!
  • Options
    MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    So the Lib Dems have failed miserably.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956
    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    My bet was on the LibDems saving their deposit!!!
    I think that's a certainty!

    Perhaps you could donate winnings to a future candidate for leadership who people don't confuse with the defence secretary....

  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,147
    Jason said:

    taffys said:

    diddums.

    Irish patriots = noble freedom fighters

    British patriots = racist scum

    Correction - ENGLISH patriots = racist scum. You can be anyone, from anywhere, be proud of it, all around the world, but you cannot be English (or possibly an Israeli) and a nationalist without being a foaming lunatic. Actually, let's narrow it down further - a white, English male.
    Perhaps if English patriots didn't so often conflate their country with the United Kingdom, this anomaly would be seen for what it is and we'd all be much more comfortable with our national identities.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,956

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
    Indeed. Those were days when Tories were unpopular....

    47%!!!!!
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073
    MP_SE said:

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    So the Lib Dems have failed miserably.
    They'll have achieved their highest ever swing from the Conservatives, approximately 25%, beating the staggering ones achieved in places like Ribble Valley in very different circumstances.

    Of course, it won't have been enough. But that's somewhat inevitable in the second safest seat in the country, and when you're starting from 6%.
  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    My bet was on the LibDems saving their deposit!!!
    I think that's a certainty!

    Perhaps you could donate winnings to a future candidate for leadership who people don't confuse with the defence secretary....

    It's one of those inverse mnemonic things - the correct version doesn't have L for Lib in it.
  • Options
    rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    Still, the ESA had huge success with the comet, and this sort of thing isn't easy.

    It *is* rocket science after all.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,141
    Alistair said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    I see Watergate 1000x is happening in real-time for all to see - and PBers still aren't much interested.

    I give up. Even if you don't care or despise both candidates, this is incredible stuff being dumped by the skipload. It'd fill several years of Sunday papers here - and a news event I never thought I'd witness.

    Ho hum.

    Even CNN is running the story.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGPAmXqvHU0
    If only O'Keefe hadn't paid put a six figure sum in compensation over his fraudulent 'stings' in the past I might actually care.
    It's a bit difficult to fathom for the reader not versed in the jargon of political dirty tricks.

    Can anyone explain what exactly "bird-dogging" is? One definition I found was that it meant incognito Democrat supporters attending Trump rallies and "starting a fight by giving anti-Trump speeches" - the assumption apparently being that those attending Trump rallies will naturally respond with violence to verbal criticism of their candidate.

    It sounds rather like what I would call "heckling".Is that viewed as a dirty trick in the USA?

  • Options
    UKIP Leadership candidate shocker.

    Journalist: A lot of people talk about racism within UKIP – how do you deal with these criticisms levelled at your party?

    Candidate David Kurton: A good question! I usually answer with humour. I am blessed with melanin, so if anyone levels that criticism I say ‘UKIP isn’t racist; I love white people!’

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/08/28/interview-ukip-chemist-david-kurten-makes-his-case-for-being-the-partys-choice-for-london-mayor/
  • Options
    rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    Yeah, let's tear up treaties we don't like any more. That's sure to have countries queuing up to make free trade treaties with us.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073
    Ishmael_X said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    My bet was on the LibDems saving their deposit!!!
    I think that's a certainty!

    Perhaps you could donate winnings to a future candidate for leadership who people don't confuse with the defence secretary....

    It's one of those inverse mnemonic things - the correct version doesn't have L for Lib in it.
    Perhaps you could simply buy a set of these: https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/products/trump-pence-maga-button-set-of-4

    And then wear them (all of them) for a week :):)
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,147
    rcs1000 said:

    Ishmael_X said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    My bet was on the LibDems saving their deposit!!!
    I think that's a certainty!

    Perhaps you could donate winnings to a future candidate for leadership who people don't confuse with the defence secretary....

    It's one of those inverse mnemonic things - the correct version doesn't have L for Lib in it.
    Perhaps you could simply buy a set of these: https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/products/trump-pence-maga-button-set-of-4

    And then wear them (all of them) for a week :):)
    Or one of these?

    https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/products/i-am-a-deplorable-stars-tee-black?variant=29292143942
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
    I suspect the Conservatives would lose a Richmond Park by-election. But it will be interesting to see how well they do tomorrow.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%
  • Options
    Paul_BedfordshirePaul_Bedfordshire Posts: 3,632
    edited October 2016
    Barnesian said:

    Scott_P said:
    diddums.

    Are the Irish Government going to get Mr Adams and his friends to undecommission the weapons put out of use if we ignore them?

    If they are not careful they will end up with a UK version of Mr Trumps Wall snaking across Ulster. That will do wonders for the Republics economy.
    Careful
    Careful?

    Because they havent gone away you know?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073
    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening...

    (Not that I'll be watching. Damn it, why couldn't they have done the debate and the Witney by-election on the same day?)

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited October 2016
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening...

    (Not that I'll be watching. Damn it, why couldn't they have done the debate and the Witney by-election on the same day?)

    What time does the Shit Show , Jerry Springer Special, Debate start?
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
    I suspect the Conservatives would lose a Richmond Park by-election. But it will be interesting to see how well they do tomorrow.
    I think anything under 30% and they'd be disappointed. It's been a phenomenal campaign they've been running there with volunteers from all over the country going down. I'm in Dorset and I personally know a dozen or more who have been from surrounding area. Social media is proving to be an enormous help - with virtual phone banks they can do thousands of phone calls a day.
  • Options
    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening...

    (Not that I'll be watching. Damn it, why couldn't they have done the debate and the Witney by-election on the same day?)

    What time does the Shit Show , Jerry Springer Special, Debate start?
    2am UK
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,147
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening..
    Agreed.

    Has there ever been any research on which types of voters watch the debates and whether the ones who watch the first and then tune out are likely to have already made up their minds at that point?
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    Take that up with the Witney Libdem rampers.
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening...

    (Not that I'll be watching. Damn it, why couldn't they have done the debate and the Witney by-election on the same day?)

    What time does the Shit Show , Jerry Springer Special, Debate start?
    2am UK
    Thanks....Better pop out and get a jumbo bag of popcorn...
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    It seems more and more unlikely that a 2020 general election will be May vs Corbyn with polls like today's. Either it'll be those two in 2017 or 2018 or May against someone else in 2020.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,073

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    Take that up with the Witney Libdem rampers.
    I think they are excessively optimistic, nothing more. Hardly a crime.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,672
    rpjs said:

    Yeah, let's tear up treaties we don't like any more. That's sure to have countries queuing up to make free trade treaties with us.
    Other nation states don't have a veto on democratic decisions the UK takes related to its domestic law.
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening...

    (Not that I'll be watching. Damn it, why couldn't they have done the debate and the Witney by-election on the same day?)

    Lightweight.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,147
    AndyJS said:

    It seems more and more unlikely that a 2020 general election will be May vs Corbyn with polls like today's. Either it'll be those two in 2017 or 2018 or May against someone else in 2020.

    Corbyn's position is stronger than ever, and his performances are becoming more assured. He's not going anywhere.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,672
    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
    Indeed. Those were days when Tories were unpopular....

    47%!!!!!
    FWIW I think the Tories are in the 40-43% box, and Mori overcooks the big two, but encouraging nonetheless.
  • Options

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening..
    Agreed.

    Has there ever been any research on which types of voters watch the debates and whether the ones who watch the first and then tune out are likely to have already made up their minds at that point?
    William Hills were offering 11/2 a few days ago now they are offering 4-1 (ie 8-2).

    In Witney however they are offering 12-1 on the Libdems winning.

    So basically Wm Hill think it three times more likely that Trump will win than the Libdems will win Witney.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    Take that up with the Witney Libdem rampers.
    The LDs are right to ramp. If you don't believe you can do the impossible, it'll never happen. Being realistic would probably depress their activists and they'd definitely have a disappointing result.
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    Take that up with the Witney Libdem rampers.
    I think they are excessively optimistic, nothing more. Hardly a crime.
    No, but when at the same time much the same people lampoon anyone suggesting Trump might win it does get rather irritating.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,672
    rcs1000 said:

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Now is the big question.

    To whom should Ismael_X send my Witney winnings to?

    Scott_P said:

    @MrHarryCole: Tory source concerned the LibDems could take up to 30 per cent of the vote in Witney tomorrow.

    Can anyone say 'expectation management'?

    This reminds me an awful lot of Oldham...
    Clearly many Tories still live in craven fear of the LD by-election machine of the 1990s.

    In my view, those days are gone and the world has moved on.
    I suspect the Conservatives would lose a Richmond Park by-election. But it will be interesting to see how well they do tomorrow.
    I think Richmond is the sort of place that is only Tory these days because its wealthy residents don't want to pay too much tax, but is otherwise far closer to Brighton in values than Buckinghamshire.
  • Options

    NEW THREAD

  • Options
    AndyJS said:

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    Yet Con 47 Lib 7 means a libdem shoo-in in Witney
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    Take that up with the Witney Libdem rampers.
    The LDs are right to ramp. If you don't believe you can do the impossible, it'll never happen. Being realistic would probably depress their activists and they'd definitely have a disappointing result.
    Thats not what people say to Plato when she ramps Trump...
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,405
    edited October 2016
    Wow. Very real geopolitical concerns in an area of the UK and its neighbour where within living memory there was murder and death on a grand scale are now dismissed by the Brexiters in such, frankly, an unpatriotic manner.

    Beggars belief.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,141

    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    YouGov/Economist:

    Clinton 47%
    Trump 43%

    That's a pretty encouraging Trump number. And it could all change this evening..
    Agreed.

    Has there ever been any research on which types of voters watch the debates and whether the ones who watch the first and then tune out are likely to have already made up their minds at that point?
    Not exactly that, but an article on 538 has some figures on the response of the polls to the third debate in previous elections:
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-needs-to-win-tonights-debate-but-that-would-only-be-step-one/
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,079
    Off-topic:

    A interesting, but quite sad, story of a plane crash whose black box may have only just been discovered after thirty years - but no-one wants to decode it.

    https://www.outsideonline.com/2126426/what-happened-eastern-airlines-flight-980
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,672
    TOPPING said:

    Wow. Very real geopolitical concerns in an area of the UK and its neighbour where within living memory there was murder and death on a grand scale are now dismissed by the Brexiters in such, frankly, an unpatriotic manner.

    Beggars belief.
    Fuck off, Topping. Sick of your childish goading and digging.

    Grow up.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,405

    TOPPING said:

    Wow. Very real geopolitical concerns in an area of the UK and its neighbour where within living memory there was murder and death on a grand scale are now dismissed by the Brexiters in such, frankly, an unpatriotic manner.

    Beggars belief.
    Fuck off, Topping. Sick of your childish goading and digging.

    Grow up.
    Not even funny. Discussing the very real issue of the situation in Northern Ireland, your comment was: tough shit.

    Despicable ignorant coward. Fuck off yourself.
  • Options
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Wow. Very real geopolitical concerns in an area of the UK and its neighbour where within living memory there was murder and death on a grand scale are now dismissed by the Brexiters in such, frankly, an unpatriotic manner.

    Beggars belief.
    Fuck off, Topping. Sick of your childish goading and digging.

    Grow up.
    Not even funny. Discussing the very real issue of the situation in Northern Ireland, your comment was: tough shit.

    Despicable ignorant coward. Fuck off yourself.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STIvNjWobzA
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    FF43 said:


    My personal view is that the championing of 'free trade deals' was a post-hoc rationalisation by the Leavers. They recognised that the economic arguments were massively on the Remain side, and so convinced themselves that there was some vaguely-defined pot of trade-gold which we could magically access by free trade deals. The fact that there is no evidence of this, and a lot of evidence to the contrary (see, for example the point @rcs1000 has made here that there are very, very few significant trade deals between the G20 states other than the big blocs) was dismissed with hand-waving*.

    Now that the referendum has been won by the Leavers, they don't actually need that pretence any more, and of course the government has to deal with reality. The reality is that business is very worried; in particular, our car industry is simply not viable without tariff-free and largely hassle-free trade in its cross-border intra-EU supply chain.

    I don't know how this will play out, but I wouldn't rule out the Customs Union idea.

    *see upthread for definition!

    Repost this. Staying in the Customs Union should be a no-brainer if we leave the Single Market


    ADVANTAGES of REMAINING in CUSTOM UNION
    1. Tariff -free transit of industrial goods with the EU/EEA (but not services or agriculture)
    2. Ready-made set of free trade agreements with third party countries already negotiated by the EU. DIY will result in a long gap while the new deals are negotiated. The EU has more market clout than the UK to get better deals
    3. Much lower burden and cost of red tape. Exporters with supply chains don’t require origination certification for the components nor for finished products
    4. UK negotiators can concentrate on the key EU and WTO arrangements. They are spread too thin to take on third country negotiations as well.
    5. Early commitment to a Customs Union would remove uncertainty for investment in UK industrials (think Nissan in Sunderland).
    6. BONUS advantage! Possible redundancy for Liam Fox. The UK would still be able to negotiate Free Trade Agreements with third countries, but is presumably constrained to the import tariffs already set by the EU.

    ADVANTAGES of LEAVING the CUSTOM UNION
    1. The UK can unilaterally reduce its import duties allowing them to compete better with EU countries on price for finished products to third countries. A partial compensation for the barriers to EU trade.
    2. The UK may be more flexible in negotiating deals with third countries and so may have a higher chance of success than the EU for deals still to be signed.
    Do you think that deals the EU do with third parties in future will take into considerations the UK's wants and needs?

    A better structure would be something like the Turkish/EU relationship
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,051
    Southam Observer....bloody hell comrade, you write some top notch stuff.
This discussion has been closed.