Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » May’s first PMQs: She’s going be a challenge for either Cor

135678

Comments

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,718
    John_M said:

    May hurting UKIP more than Labour is the simple takeaway.
    UKIP unchanged since the general election though however that would be the biggest Tory and Labour gap since the 1987 general election, so maybe May is the new Thatcher and whether Labour pick Corbyn or Smith it does not make a real difference, they are just choosing between Foot and Kinnock!
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    Owen Smith doesn't want Brexit. That's going to go down well in Northern areas.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,405

    How 2015 Lab GE voters are splitting

    76% still Labour voters

    8% now voting Tory

    9% now voting Lib Dem

    5% now voting UKIP

    3% now voting other

    I was a Labour GE2015 voter, but they didn't ask ME :lol:
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    How big a shift must that be in London and Scotland?! Subsample heaven indeed for some.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Interesting that Mrs. May's folder of supposedly readily accessible information, which no PM ever seems to actually refer to, appeared to be a tiny fraction the thickness of the one used by her predecessor.
    Might I correct her on one all too commonly mispronounced word ...... children are brought up not bought up. A horrid mistake she uttered twice within a few seconds ..... aargh!

    Yes, she won today, but was far too deliberately Thatcherite for my liking.

    Me too.

    And Tories only buy children for cooking.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,410
    Well you know that rule that Polly Toynbee is always wrong.....

    https://twitter.com/pollytoynbee/status/755741928487084032?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    How 2015 Lab GE voters are splitting

    76% still Labour voters

    8% now voting Tory

    9% now voting Lib Dem

    5% now voting UKIP

    3% now voting other

    How many Don't knows before that?
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    Artist said:

    I don't remember UKIP being at 20% to be honest.

    Especially with Yougov, changes sound nonsense.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,999
    PlatoSaid said:

    Interesting that Mrs. May's folder of supposedly readily accessible information, which no PM ever seems to actually refer to, appeared to be a tiny fraction the thickness of the one used by her predecessor.
    Might I correct her on one all too commonly mispronounced word ...... children are brought up not bought up. A horrid mistake she uttered twice within a few seconds ..... aargh!

    Yes, she won today, but was far too deliberately Thatcherite for my liking.

    Me too.

    And Tories only buy children for cooking.
    Don't be silly. Do you think chimneys clean themselves?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @britainelects: Westminster voting intention:
    CON: 40% (+10)
    LAB: 29% (-4)
    UKIP: 12% (-8)
    LDEM: 9% (+3)
    GRN: 3% (-)
    (via YouGov / 17-18/07)
    Chgs. from April

    Bloody hell

    Kipppers flocking back to the Tories. Labour in freefall. Despairing lefty Remainians moving to the Lib Dems.
    Not so sure about that for the LDs - it's been a high mark for them for awhile, but they have been as high as 9 in the past year. And Kipper support will be very ephemeral.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,078
    Miss Plato, surely cooking and slavery?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,405
    PlatoSaid said:

    Interesting that Mrs. May's folder of supposedly readily accessible information, which no PM ever seems to actually refer to, appeared to be a tiny fraction the thickness of the one used by her predecessor.
    Might I correct her on one all too commonly mispronounced word ...... children are brought up not bought up. A horrid mistake she uttered twice within a few seconds ..... aargh!

    Yes, she won today, but was far too deliberately Thatcherite for my liking.

    Me too.

    And Tories only buy children for cooking.
    Junior Masterchef? ;)
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,257
    TMIGIPM
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,410
    @Mike_Fabricant: The Conservative benches were all shell-shocked by the devastating, crisp, fine-tuned attack at #PMQs earlier. #KeepCorbynasLeader!
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,427
    kle4 said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    How big a shift must that be in London and Scotland?! Subsample heaven indeed for some.
    Yup. But if ALL the subsamples are pointing the same way, there's a trend.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    edited July 2016
    Two Taxi Tim Farron must be encouraged by the LibDems' 9% level of support in this latest poll .... surely just about their highest score since last year's G.E.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    Yup.
  • BannedInParisBannedInParis Posts: 2,191
    ToryJim said:
    While I don't believe that for a second, it might stop the "oh, but he's doing OK in the polls" nonsense.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334

    TMIGIPM

    Theresa May is God is PM?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    John_M said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    ttps://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    Owen Smith doesn't want Brexit. That's going to go down well in Northern areas.
    By the time there is another GE it won't really matter, if he can manage to get to be leader in the meantime. Unless there is a GE prior to declaring article 50, which doesn't seem on the cards, it will be at the least well advanced before another GE, at which point Smith's wish to prevent it won't necessarily be an issue - he can make a play for the 48% now, say he would have prevented it if he had the opportunity, but like most people once we are out, he's probably not going to campaign on rejoining, which is a whole other kettle of fish.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: Some people think 2017 election would be good way officially getting rid of Corbyn. But I'm not sure Labour could survive it.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,410

    Two Taxi Tim Farron must be encouraged by the LibDems 9% level of support in this latest poll .... surely just about their highest score since last year's G.E.

    No they were at 11% in a recent poll
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,999

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    That Scotland figure should give the Tories several seats. I don't particularly believe it - big MoEs for unweighted subsamples - but John Major's Conservatives won 11 seats with 25.5% of the Scottish vote in 1992. The big SNP share makes that unrealistic now but 24% ought to deliver half a dozen.

    Also, would be fascinating to see the breakdown for 'the north'. Take out Newcastle, S Yorks, Burnhamshire and so on (and Hagueshire on the other side), and I'd guess that it would look very healthy for the Blues across the W Yorks / Lancs marginals.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,385
    edited July 2016
    kle4 said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @britainelects: Westminster voting intention:
    CON: 40% (+10)
    LAB: 29% (-4)
    UKIP: 12% (-8)
    LDEM: 9% (+3)
    GRN: 3% (-)
    (via YouGov / 17-18/07)
    Chgs. from April

    Bloody hell

    Kipppers flocking back to the Tories. Labour in freefall. Despairing lefty Remainians moving to the Lib Dems.
    Not so sure about that for the LDs - it's been a high mark for them for awhile, but they have been as high as 9 in the past year. And Kipper support will be very ephemeral.
    Changes from April?? Have they selected Labour's most favourable poll from the last 12 months for comparison, then? Surely that was not the last YouGov GE VI poll.
  • PlatoSaid said:

    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    Yup.
    I totally agree also - generally speaking, hectoring women are not vote winners.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @britainelects: Westminster voting intention:
    CON: 40% (+10)
    LAB: 29% (-4)
    UKIP: 12% (-8)
    LDEM: 9% (+3)
    GRN: 3% (-)
    (via YouGov / 17-18/07)
    Chgs. from April

    Bloody hell

    Kipppers flocking back to the Tories. Labour in freefall. Despairing lefty Remainians moving to the Lib Dems.
    Perhaps the last century was just an anomaly and by 2021 it'll be Tories vs Liberals/Whigs once more!
    We can but hope :)
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    You can only close mines and steelworks once. I'm sure lazy people will peddle the Thatcher idea, but it really doesn't suit the times. We're three times as wealthy as we were in the late 70s.

    If May doesn't go after the boomers, I shall be incredibly disappointed.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited July 2016
    Just seen the Lab retention figure with don't knows: 58%

    42% - that's nearly 4m 2015 voters - will not commit to Labour.

    Corbyn loses Labour 4 million voters. The Lib Dem/UKIP offset is only about 600k.

    Labour would poll 20-25% in an election if that were true.

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    FF43 said:

    kle4 said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    How big a shift must that be in London and Scotland?! Subsample heaven indeed for some.
    Yup. But if ALL the subsamples are pointing the same way, there's a trend.
    If it is maintained, yes possibly. Frankly I'm susprised the gap with Lab is not higher in the South, although apparently Corbyn is actually more popular among the county Lab members.
  • YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    I signed up to the Saving Labour site and had done the psychological contortions needed to pay £3 to save fully functioning democracy in the UK but... It was the coup instigators who were told hiked the fee to £25 and retroactively disenfranchised new full members. Apart from reminding me of everything that's kept me out of the Labour Party all my life where is the strategy ? Why attempt to mobilise centrists to join AND make it bloody difficult at the same time ? I'll keep my £25 and wait for SDP2 if that's their attitude.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Sky - man in winter coat 'with wires hanging down from it' arrested in Brussels.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,718
    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    At the moment May is Merkel in personality, Thatcher in dominance and a combination of the two in policy
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,191

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    That Scotland figure should give the Tories several seats. I don't particularly believe it - big MoEs for unweighted subsamples - but John Major's Conservatives won 11 seats with 25.5% of the Scottish vote in 1992. The big SNP share makes that unrealistic now but 24% ought to deliver half a dozen.

    Also, would be fascinating to see the breakdown for 'the north'. Take out Newcastle, S Yorks, Burnhamshire and so on (and Hagueshire on the other side), and I'd guess that it would look very healthy for the Blues across the W Yorks / Lancs marginals.
    That Scottish sub sample could give the Conservatives 15-20. Yeah I don't believe it either. Although I would expect them to pick up seats in Scotland at the moment but 2-3 max.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Geekily loving the new, expanded, detail of YouGov's target weightings on pages 3 & 4:

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/7r7q7dltth/InternalResults_160720_VI.pdf
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    htts://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    That Scotland figure should give the Tories several seats. I don't particularly believe it - big MoEs for unweighted subsamples - but John Major's Conservatives won 11 seats with 25.5% of the Scottish vote in 1992. The big SNP share makes that unrealistic now but 24% ought to deliver half a dozen.
    .
    The Tories came within a few hundred votes of getting a second seat in Scotland in 2015, which would have been hilarious.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berwickshire,_Roxburgh_and_Selkirk_(UK_Parliament_constituency)
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548
    edited July 2016
    Pro_Rata said:

    kle4 said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @britainelects: Westminster voting intention:
    CON: 40% (+10)
    LAB: 29% (-4)
    UKIP: 12% (-8)
    LDEM: 9% (+3)
    GRN: 3% (-)
    (via YouGov / 17-18/07)
    Chgs. from April

    Bloody hell

    Kipppers flocking back to the Tories. Labour in freefall. Despairing lefty Remainians moving to the Lib Dems.
    Not so sure about that for the LDs - it's been a high mark for them for awhile, but they have been as high as 9 in the past year. And Kipper support will be very ephemeral.
    Changes from April?? Have they selected Labour's most favourable poll from the last 12 months for comparison, then? Surely that was not the last YouGov GE VI poll.
    Last Yougov VI poll was April
    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/3fpd29osgc/YG trackers-Voting Intention-160428.pdf
    And the change figures given are correct
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    chestnut said:

    Just seen the Lab retention figure with don't knows: 58%

    42% - that's nearly 4m 2015 voters - will not commit to Labour.

    Corbyn loses Labour 4 million voters. The Lib Dem/UKIP offset is only about 600k.

    Labour would poll 20-25% in an election if that were true.

    :open_mouth:
  • MontyHallMontyHall Posts: 226
    edited July 2016

    Artist said:

    I don't remember UKIP being at 20% to be honest.

    Especially with Yougov, changes sound nonsense.
    It would be quite incredible if UKIP VI didn't drop after the vote to Leave the EU, the resignation of Farage and the destruction of the Cameroons. Their goal has been achieved, I would think they have a lot less to be fired up about

    It seems Yougovs previous polls were wildly out of kilter with other firms re Con share, have they changed something?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,295
    edited July 2016
    OT interesting to hear the head woman of a Republicans UK on R4 just now saying she will be backing Gary Johnson and thinks he might have a chance. I see his odds on Betfair are coming in rapidly (400 on Sunday now 270). If this trend gathers pace - particularly if he makes the debates, which I gather is a possibility - then this bet must still represent good value?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    nunu said:
    That WAS since the last Yougov in April.
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024

    Well you know that rule that Polly Toynbee is always wrong.....

    https://twitter.com/pollytoynbee/status/755741928487084032?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

    Maybe Corbyn did well afterall.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    Pensioners:

    Tory 58 Labour 15 UKIP 13

    Old folk - the children of Beveridge - have written Labour off.
  • Carolus_RexCarolus_Rex Posts: 1,414

    PlatoSaid said:

    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    Yup.
    I totally agree also - generally speaking, hectoring women are not vote winners.
    One of them did pretty well in 1979, 1983 and 1987 though.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    nunu said:
    I wondered that too - lots of the change numbers look strange.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,385

    How 2015 Lab GE voters are splitting

    76% still Labour voters

    8% now voting Tory

    9% now voting Lib Dem

    5% now voting UKIP

    3% now voting other

    I was a Labour GE2015 voter, but they didn't ask ME :lol:
    With a 30% headline Labour figure more or less matching GE2015, suggests Labour have also pulled in some support from elsewhere. Greens, non-voters, UKIP?

    Polls, eh!
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Pulpstar said:

    nunu said:
    That WAS since the last Yougov in April.
    If this is the first since the election why not post changes relative to the election, rather than the last pre-election poll?
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    valleyboy said:

    Just a thought. Whilst agreeing totally that May trampled all over JC, you should be careful in taking this Thatcher comparison too far. There are many many people out there who cringe at the thought of the Iron Lady and would never vote Tory simply because of her time as pm. A Thatcher mk2 may just galvanise the left against the Tories and not JC.

    yes but her message is different, an economy for everyone not the privliged few.
  • John_M said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    Owen Smith doesn't want Brexit. That's going to go down well in Northern areas.
    That rather depends on the line now taken by Corbyn ..... will he (sensibly) declare that the people have now spoken and we must go with the majority decision?
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    kle4 said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    How big a shift must that be in London and Scotland?! Subsample heaven indeed for some.
    24% is only 2% higher than what Ruth got not that you should compare two elections.
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    Pulpstar said:

    nunu said:
    That WAS since the last Yougov in April.
    If this is the first since the election why not post changes relative to the election, rather than the last pre-election poll?
    Was only local elections then, doesn't compare to a GE VI poll
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,295
    Pulpstar said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @britainelects: Westminster voting intention:
    CON: 40% (+10)
    LAB: 29% (-4)
    UKIP: 12% (-8)
    LDEM: 9% (+3)
    GRN: 3% (-)
    (via YouGov / 17-18/07)
    Chgs. from April

    Bloody hell

    Kipppers flocking back to the Tories. Labour in freefall. Despairing lefty Remainians moving to the Lib Dems.
    Perhaps the last century was just an anomaly and by 2021 it'll be Tories vs Liberals/Whigs once more!
    We can but hope :)
    That would be logical since there is clear political space between the liberal and conservative view on social issues, and despite its more liberal membership (or at least the middle class bit of it) labour relies on wwc and Muslim votes, neither groups that are known for being particularly liberal, and hence is always going to be a poor champion for liberal social issues.

    On the economy no-one seems to have a clue anyway.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,427
    edited July 2016

    Two Taxi Tim Farron must be encouraged by the LibDems 9% level of support in this latest poll .... surely just about their highest score since last year's G.E.

    I think the Lib Dems have an opportunity, but we don't know if it will be realised after them being invisible for so long. Their case goes something like this:

    A lot of people think the Coalition government worked much better than the one that followed. People who voted Remain will particularly think that because of the Brexit disaster (from their POV), but not just Remainers. We can generalise this goodwill to say Lib Dems bring a moderate and competent influence to politics across the board. So it's a just a step for people who might otherwise vote Conservative or Labour to decide we are worth voting for and to switch their votes to us.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    edited July 2016

    Pulpstar said:

    nunu said:
    That WAS since the last Yougov in April.
    If this is the first since the election why not post changes relative to the election, rather than the last pre-election poll?
    The last election only had 329 people involved, 100 % Conservative - not sure what comparing the Yougov to that will tell us...
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    runnymede said:

    Well done to all those Tory MPs and the black ops on Andrea Leadsom.

    Leadsom would have been in tears at PMQs

    Your personal nastiness to Andrea Leadsom has been one of the most unedifying features of this site over recent weeks. I read some of your comments whilst on holiday and I was, frankly, shocked.

    Thankfully, Theresa May doesn't share your spite.
    Well the behaviour of several site regulars over the last couple of months has been fairly unedifying.

    Still, as they managed to call the referendum completely wrongly despite their smug self-satisfaction we can be cheerful.
    I will never forget the squeals of delight every time Andrew Copper talked up the private polling for Remain.

    Thankfully the days of Dave's chumocracy are over.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    MontyHall said:

    Artist said:

    I don't remember UKIP being at 20% to be honest.

    Especially with Yougov, changes sound nonsense.
    It would be quite incredible if UKIP VI didn't drop after the vote to Leave the EU, the resignation of Farage and the destruction of the Cameroons. Their goal has been achieved, I would think they have a lot less to be fired up about
    I've a lot of Kippers in my timeline and they're still red hot on immigration controls/ensuring Brexit is delivered. They're very suspicious sorts when it comes to Tories following through in deed as well as word.

    Rudd's comment that there wouldn't be an immigration target now has got them going.
  • ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,257
    MaxPB said:

    TMIGIPM

    Theresa May is God is PM?
    That will do ;-)
  • MontyHallMontyHall Posts: 226
    MP_SE said:

    runnymede said:

    Well done to all those Tory MPs and the black ops on Andrea Leadsom.

    Leadsom would have been in tears at PMQs

    Your personal nastiness to Andrea Leadsom has been one of the most unedifying features of this site over recent weeks. I read some of your comments whilst on holiday and I was, frankly, shocked.

    Thankfully, Theresa May doesn't share your spite.
    Well the behaviour of several site regulars over the last couple of months has been fairly unedifying.

    Still, as they managed to call the referendum completely wrongly despite their smug self-satisfaction we can be cheerful.
    I will never forget the squeals of delight every time Andrew Copper talked up the private polling for Remain.

    Thankfully the days of Dave's chumocracy are over.
    The flagging of Betfair every time Leave drifted was handy, although it felt like an implicit troll rather than betting advice.
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
    I don't think Malc considers Brown to be a true Scotsman
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Sky - he hasn't been arrested, he's on his knees with hands on his head.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,257
    MP_SE said:

    runnymede said:

    Well done to all those Tory MPs and the black ops on Andrea Leadsom.

    Leadsom would have been in tears at PMQs

    Your personal nastiness to Andrea Leadsom has been one of the most unedifying features of this site over recent weeks. I read some of your comments whilst on holiday and I was, frankly, shocked.

    Thankfully, Theresa May doesn't share your spite.
    Well the behaviour of several site regulars over the last couple of months has been fairly unedifying.

    Still, as they managed to call the referendum completely wrongly despite their smug self-satisfaction we can be cheerful.
    I will never forget the squeals of delight every time Andrew Copper talked up the private polling for Remain.

    Thankfully the days of Dave's chumocracy are over.
    I think the polling industry would be well advised never to credit his predictions again.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,295
    nunu said:
    If you factor in the SNP at say 4.5% and PC at 0.5% that poll is pretty close to the 2015 result, with Labour a shade down and the LibDems a shade up. But no big shifts really.
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    edited July 2016
    MontyHall said:

    Artist said:

    I don't remember UKIP being at 20% to be honest.

    Especially with Yougov, changes sound nonsense.
    It would be quite incredible if UKIP VI didn't drop after the vote to Leave the EU, the resignation of Farage and the destruction of the Cameroons. Their goal has been achieved, I would think they have a lot less to be fired up about

    It seems Yougovs previous polls were wildly out of kilter with other firms re Con share, have they changed something?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
    You miss my point, and that being made by others, that the comparison used to create the figures was itself awfully out of line with both results and other polling at the time. It appears to have been wilfully chosen to create a narrative.

    How much is real drop and how much is Yougov's bad methodology?
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Stephen Kinnock looks remarkably like a young Vlad Putin.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    nunu said:

    Well you know that rule that Polly Toynbee is always wrong.....

    https://twitter.com/pollytoynbee/status/755741928487084032?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

    Maybe Corbyn did well afterall.
    Polly has to be right once in a blue moon
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    MontyHall said:

    MP_SE said:

    runnymede said:

    Well done to all those Tory MPs and the black ops on Andrea Leadsom.

    Leadsom would have been in tears at PMQs

    Your personal nastiness to Andrea Leadsom has been one of the most unedifying features of this site over recent weeks. I read some of your comments whilst on holiday and I was, frankly, shocked.

    Thankfully, Theresa May doesn't share your spite.
    Well the behaviour of several site regulars over the last couple of months has been fairly unedifying.

    Still, as they managed to call the referendum completely wrongly despite their smug self-satisfaction we can be cheerful.
    I will never forget the squeals of delight every time Andrew Copper talked up the private polling for Remain.

    Thankfully the days of Dave's chumocracy are over.
    The flagging of Betfair every time Leave drifted was handy, although it felt like an implicit troll rather than betting advice.
    UKIP is obviously a party in transition at the moment, plenty of targets for the Woolfe.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,783
    What the polls seem to be saying is that Labour will lose heavily to the Tories in the marginals, while keeping most of the core vote seats. Terrible, terrible stuff. The one very small consolation is that UKIP have a hell of a lot of work to do before they are going to mount a serious challenge.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,405

    John_M said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    Owen Smith doesn't want Brexit. That's going to go down well in Northern areas.
    That rather depends on the line now taken by Corbyn ..... will he (sensibly) declare that the people have now spoken and we must go with the majority decision?
    "The majority have no right to do wrong!"

    - Eamonn de Valera, in the wake of the June 1922 Irish Free State Election, when his Anti-Treaty wing of Sinn Fein lost to the Pro-Treaty faction and allies.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,756
    nunu said:
    The last one looked like an outlier. But, there's nothing surprising about this. People on the Right who were pissed off with David Cameron's fake renegotiation have switched back to the Tories.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    IanB2 said:

    OT interesting to hear the head woman of a Republicans UK on R4 just now saying she will be backing Gary Johnson and thinks he might have a chance. I see his odds on Betfair are coming in rapidly (400 on Sunday now 270). If this trend gathers pace - particularly if he makes the debates, which I gather is a possibility - then this bet must still represent good value?

    Zero value.

    With the Electoal College he will get no votes. The only effect may be to peel off some of the nuttier Republicans and put Hillary in the White House.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,783
    chestnut said:

    Pensioners:

    Tory 58 Labour 15 UKIP 13

    Old folk - the children of Beveridge - have written Labour off.

    And the Tories have been throwing money at them for six years :-)

    They know their client vote.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    At least the Labour Party may now be able to settle its debts before it dies.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,723

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    That Scotland figure should give the Tories several seats. I don't particularly believe it - big MoEs for unweighted subsamples - but John Major's Conservatives won 11 seats with 25.5% of the Scottish vote in 1992. The big SNP share makes that unrealistic now but 24% ought to deliver half a dozen.

    Also, would be fascinating to see the breakdown for 'the north'. Take out Newcastle, S Yorks, Burnhamshire and so on (and Hagueshire on the other side), and I'd guess that it would look very healthy for the Blues across the W Yorks / Lancs marginals.
    LOL, as much chance of them getting 6 as me being a Dutchman
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,756

    MP_SE said:

    runnymede said:

    Well done to all those Tory MPs and the black ops on Andrea Leadsom.

    Leadsom would have been in tears at PMQs

    Your personal nastiness to Andrea Leadsom has been one of the most unedifying features of this site over recent weeks. I read some of your comments whilst on holiday and I was, frankly, shocked.

    Thankfully, Theresa May doesn't share your spite.
    Well the behaviour of several site regulars over the last couple of months has been fairly unedifying.

    Still, as they managed to call the referendum completely wrongly despite their smug self-satisfaction we can be cheerful.
    I will never forget the squeals of delight every time Andrew Copper talked up the private polling for Remain.

    Thankfully the days of Dave's chumocracy are over.
    I think the polling industry would be well advised never to credit his predictions again.
    If he'd actually accepted what his polling was saying, he'd have been okay. But, he very much wanted a big win for Remain, so made assumptions that weren't well-founded.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.

    Holy Hell.

    That's stunning if true.
  • FF43 said:

    Two Taxi Tim Farron must be encouraged by the LibDems 9% level of support in this latest poll .... surely just about their highest score since last year's G.E.

    I think the Lib Dems have an opportunity, but we don't know if it will be realised after them being invisible for so long. Their case goes something like this:

    A lot of people think the Coalition government worked much better than the one that followed. People who voted Remain will particularly think that because of the Brexit disaster (from their POV), but not just Remainers. We can generalise this goodwill to say Lib Dems bring a moderate and competent influence to politics across the board. So it's a just a step for people who might otherwise vote Conservative or Labour to decide we are worth voting for and to switch their votes to us.
    One of the main problems for the LibDems is that they lost so many of their seats in the West Country, where the demographics seem likely to shift ever more in the Tories' favour over the coming years, in terms of relative wealth and age profile.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,405
    edited July 2016
    chestnut said:

    Pensioners:

    Tory 58 Labour 15 UKIP 13

    Old folk - the children of Beveridge - have written Labour off.

    I see old people!
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,723

    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
    I don't think Malc considers Brown to be a true Scotsman
    He is a halfwit and called himself North British, he is no real Scotsman.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655

    IanB2 said:

    OT interesting to hear the head woman of a Republicans UK on R4 just now saying she will be backing Gary Johnson and thinks he might have a chance. I see his odds on Betfair are coming in rapidly (400 on Sunday now 270). If this trend gathers pace - particularly if he makes the debates, which I gather is a possibility - then this bet must still represent good value?

    Zero value.

    With the Electoal College he will get no votes. The only effect may be to peel off some of the nuttier Republicans and put Hillary in the White House.
    He is on the ballot in every state. I have backed him at any rate as I'd rather not be in a Johnson sized hole when he gets included in the presidential debates. There is a value, albeit slight.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,295

    IanB2 said:

    OT interesting to hear the head woman of a Republicans UK on R4 just now saying she will be backing Gary Johnson and thinks he might have a chance. I see his odds on Betfair are coming in rapidly (400 on Sunday now 270). If this trend gathers pace - particularly if he makes the debates, which I gather is a possibility - then this bet must still represent good value?

    Zero value.

    With the Electoal College he will get no votes. The only effect may be to peel off some of the nuttier Republicans and put Hillary in the White House.
    The value, surely, is that if he did make the debates (and the republican lady thought his poll ratings were almost at the threshold) his odds would surely come in from 270/1 and therefore there is value in backing at 270. I thought there was value at 400 and my first bet is already in the green.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,723
    PlatoSaid said:

    Stephen Kinnock looks remarkably like a young Vlad Putin.

    Just minus the brains
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,405
    PlatoSaid said:

    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.

    Holy Hell.

    That's stunning if true.
    Unfortunately, I've decided to sit this one out (I was a 2015 £3-er).
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,723

    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
    You are three quid short of a pound.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,295

    What the polls seem to be saying is that Labour will lose heavily to the Tories in the marginals, while keeping most of the core vote seats. Terrible, terrible stuff. The one very small consolation is that UKIP have a hell of a lot of work to do before they are going to mount a serious challenge.

    Especially as it always used to be assumed that the more left wing MPs were in the safer seats, isolated from the swings of the electorate?
  • PlatoSaid said:

    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.

    Holy Hell.

    That's stunning if true.
    What is that likely to mean, voting wise?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,797

    I signed up to the Saving Labour site and had done the psychological contortions needed to pay £3 to save fully functioning democracy in the UK but... It was the coup instigators who were told hiked the fee to £25 and retroactively disenfranchised new full members. Apart from reminding me of everything that's kept me out of the Labour Party all my life where is the strategy ? Why attempt to mobilise centrists to join AND make it bloody difficult at the same time ? I'll keep my £25 and wait for SDP2 if that's their attitude.

    If I thought my £25 vote would make any difference to the end result it would be a worthwhile investment for the £500+ windfall I would get... As the electorate has been rigged in a way that I suspect makes things far more Corbynite than the NEC and PLP realise I'll keep my money...

    Labour as party that aims for Parliament and power is dead... The sooner the PLP realise that and act upon it the more likely they are to survive the next election...
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,410
    I think BT are having problems again
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    malcolmg said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Stephen Kinnock looks remarkably like a young Vlad Putin.

    Just minus the brains
    and the guts.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,257

    At least the Labour Party may now be able to settle its debts before it dies.

    Hard not to see Corbyn's price on Betfair as value
  • MattWMattW Posts: 24,365
    edited July 2016
    Listening back to PMQ.

    Corbyn attacking Matron for the falling proportion of younger people buying their houses between 1998 and 2016 ie two thirds government by his own party, and turning querulous when it was pointed out.

    Dear God, that man is a gormless oaf.
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
    I don't think Malc considers Brown to be a true Scotsman
    He is a halfwit and called himself North British, he is no real Scotsman.
    ah I see only SNP are true Scots?
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024

    chestnut said:

    Pensioners:

    Tory 58 Labour 15 UKIP 13

    Old folk - the children of Beveridge - have written Labour off.

    And the Tories have been throwing money at them for six years :-)

    They know their client vote.
    indeed and Labour knows theirs.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    edited July 2016

    PlatoSaid said:

    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.

    Holy Hell.

    That's stunning if true.
    What is that likely to mean, voting wise?
    If Corbyn is on the ballot, he wins.

    If next week's legal challenge suceeds then Labour is into even deeper legal problems and could be looking at lawsuits from people who have just paid £25, as well as Corbyn himself who was not required to collect any nominations.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    PlatoSaid said:

    @STJamesl

    Am hearing that by close of play around 150k people will have become registered supporters in the Labour leadership contest


    Blimey, they should have made it £100 a pop.

    Holy Hell.

    That's stunning if true.
    It's either a moment of surprise revolution, or incredible blindness - Labour membership has never been more popular in modern times, and either they really are more reflective of the wider public than we think, or might prove appealing to it more than we think, or it is a party making itself unelectable in a really extreme way by total choice.
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    Crumbs, when did a party ever shift 10 points either way between polls? Admittedly a gap since April and the April one looks a bit dodgy if the Tories were at 30% and UKIP 20%!

    But blimey, this doesn't half look good for May - and she's hardly started yet!
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    nunu said:

    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    If you are talking about borrowing , why is England borrowing £100B a year you halfwit.

    Because of Gordon Brown.

    Just in case you've forgotten him, he's Scottish.
    I don't think Malc considers Brown to be a true Scotsman
    He is a halfwit and called himself North British, he is no real Scotsman.
    ah I see only SNP are true Scots?
    That's right, 'proper Scots' must be SNP, as our SNP posters have consistently told us.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    John_M said:

    Sub samples alert, but even in LONDON the Tories are ahead

    https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/755752025678307332

    Owen Smith doesn't want Brexit. That's going to go down well in Northern areas.
    It just needs to go down well with the selectorate at present. Unless he is leader it matters not.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    I just can't see Owen Smith being the type to inspire 150,000 sign ups. Not even 50,000.
This discussion has been closed.