Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The skids are under Jeremy. Members should get the chance t

SystemSystem Posts: 12,266
edited July 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The skids are under Jeremy. Members should get the chance to put him out of his misery.

Don Brind argues against the Labour leader stepping down in favour of a unity candidate.Jeremy Corbyn must be ousted by the members if Labour’s credibility with the voters is to have any chance of being rescued. The idea of him standing down in favour of a unity candidate is understandable – but wrong.

Read the full story here


«1345678

Comments

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,078
    But will the PLP put up a candidate against him?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Second, and thanks Don!
  • Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294

    But will the PLP put up a candidate against him?

    Why do you doubt it?

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited July 2016
    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,078
    Mr. Abroad, because it was meant to happen yesterday, and didn't.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    Stunts like this might not help Corbyn's position.

    https://twitter.com/election_data/status/748924405250678784
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    Interesting to see the report on Hackney North, I hadn't heard about that
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,078
    Mr. W, one hopes May deploys her massive support tactically to nobble Gove in the first round. Otherwise, Fox is done for out of the gate.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129
    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited July 2016
    FPT
    Scott_P said:

    Jonathan said:

    This is simply brilliant. Gives me goosebumps.

    https://becausewearehere.co.uk/wearehere/

    It is outstanding. I have been retweeting all day
    Outstanding indeed - For a moving tribute, it's up there with the poppies at the Tower.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I basically agree with Don Brind but there is one big negative of a contested election that must be thought about: it takes a lot of time.

    The Conservatives are well-advanced on their own leadership battle. Labour risk being caught with their pants down if a new Conservative leader immediately decides to test her authority with the electorate to get a new mandate.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    Stop Trump !
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Mr. W, one hopes May deploys her massive support tactically to nobble Gove in the first round. Otherwise, Fox is done for out of the gate.

    I'm not sure it matters. But I think May simply wants to put the distance between her and the rest.

    May's opponents are scrabbling about to be a distant second and from then not embarrass themselves as the voting continues.

    Depending on May's lead in the later rounds they may decide to call it quits before the members get to vote.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    She is reading your emails as you type.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,600
    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...
  • Isn't the reason Corbyn is hanging on and will continue to hang on is that it is 'for the good of the socialist revolution' so to speak?
    And he is doing his version of blood, toil, tears and sweat.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129
    JackW said:

    Mr. W, one hopes May deploys her massive support tactically to nobble Gove in the first round. Otherwise, Fox is done for out of the gate.

    I'm not sure it matters. But I think May simply wants to put the distance between her and the rest.

    May's opponents are scrabbling about to be a distant second and from then not embarrass themselves as the voting continues.

    Depending on May's lead in the later rounds they may decide to call it quits before the members get to vote.
    Agreed - see my post at 6.12
  • Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294

    Mr. Abroad, because it was meant to happen yesterday, and didn't.

    That was Angela Eagle. She may be under pressure to make way for someone else. No - I don't know who, but I doubt many in the PLP think she's their best shot.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,783
    kle4 said:

    Interesting to see the report on Hackney North, I hadn't heard about that

    There have been votes against Corbyn in a number of London CLPs. Another was in the St Pancras & Holborn one, right next door to Islington North.

  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    I thought I read yesterday that 40 odd of Bojo’s supporters moved to Gove when he announced he was standing? – must have got the wrong of the stick?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129
    dr_spyn said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    She is reading your emails as you type.
    I can say I definitely do not want COE
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,600
    edited July 2016

    FPT

    Scott_P said:

    Jonathan said:

    This is simply brilliant. Gives me goosebumps.

    https://becausewearehere.co.uk/wearehere/

    It is outstanding. I have been retweeting all day
    Outstanding indeed - For a moving tribute, it's up there with the poppies at the Tower.
    That is absolutely brilliant. Very well done indeed to whoever (very quietly) organised it. :+1:
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    I basically agree with Don Brind but there is one big negative of a contested election that must be thought about: it takes a lot of time.

    The Conservatives are well-advanced on their own leadership battle. Labour risk being caught with their pants down if a new Conservative leader immediately decides to test her authority with the electorate to get a new mandate.

    Yes. Excellent analysis by Don which may change my view that Labour are better off trying to smoke him out. One thing is certain - Alastair is right - this cannot be allowed to drag on. Call the challenge Tuesday, then align with Tories and declare on 9 Sep.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    dr_spyn said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    She is reading your emails as you type.
    Can we learn to spell her name correctly? Theresa
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,409
    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    She's what 16/17 MPs from being guaranteed a place in the final two
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    Sandpit said:

    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...

    Corbyn would have been long gone, if indeed ever elected, had he been a Tory. Labour just haven't got the stomach for this kind of stuff. They are all heart and no brain, but 'twas ever thus.
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    edited July 2016
    https://twitter.com/NaheemSays/status/748928507674320897
    KEEPCorbyn rally in Manchester...
    Liverpool's having one tomorrow.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    She's what 16/17 MPs from being guaranteed a place in the final two
    Public declarations don't necessarily mean votes BUT given the number of undeclareds...
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    There are at least seven idiots in the Conservative Party.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Jobabob said:

    dr_spyn said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    She is reading your emails as you type.
    Can we learn to spell her name correctly? Theresa
    "May" is easier :D
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    @TSE These are public nominations. So absolutely no guarantees about what happens in the privacy of the vote...
  • Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294
    Jason said:

    Sandpit said:

    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...

    Corbyn would have been long gone, if indeed ever elected, had he been a Tory. Labour just haven't got the stomach for this kind of stuff. They are all heart and no brain, but 'twas ever thus.
    I take it you like voting for a heartless Party....

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    edited July 2016
    http://www teresamay org uk/ :o
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    JackW said:

    Mr. W, one hopes May deploys her massive support tactically to nobble Gove in the first round. Otherwise, Fox is done for out of the gate.

    I'm not sure it matters. But I think May simply wants to put the distance between her and the rest.

    May's opponents are scrabbling about to be a distant second and from then not embarrass themselves as the voting continues.

    Depending on May's lead in the later rounds they may decide to call it quits before the members get to vote.
    Yes, I think the only one that scares me is Leadsom, she really does seem like a true to the cause Leaver. If she can ignite that base instinct in the membership she might just win, but hopefully she is just playing for a big role in May's Cabinet.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,409

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    She's what 16/17 MPs from being guaranteed a place in the final two
    Public declarations don't necessarily mean votes BUT given the number of undeclareds...

    @TSE These are public nominations. So absolutely no guarantees about what happens in the privacy of the vote...

    Very true.

    And of course, MPs can switch their voted in the second and subsequent ballots.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,920
    RodCrosby said:

    https://twitter.com/NaheemSays/status/748928507674320897
    KEEPCorbyn rally in Manchester...
    Liverpool's having one tomorrow.

    Warming up for the October Revolution following the Brexit-triggered economic collapse and rejection of the Tory party by the voters.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,999
    The Tories
    Jason said:

    Sandpit said:

    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...

    Corbyn would have been long gone, if indeed ever elected, had he been a Tory. Labour just haven't got the stomach for this kind of stuff. They are all heart and no brain, but 'twas ever thus.
    He wouldn't have been elected. Had the Tories lost in 2015, it'd have been a Shadow Cabinet-heavy line-up, plus Boris. No space for an outsider from the right-wing fringe.

    Also worth noting that if Labour had the Tories' rules, Corbyn wouldn't have been elected in the first place (probably Burnham; if not, Cooper), and would without question now be out.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    RodCrosby said:

    https://twitter.com/NaheemSays/status/748928507674320897
    KEEPCorbyn rally in Manchester...
    Liverpool's having one tomorrow.

    I suspect at least half of those people of being members of the Conservative Party
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    edited July 2016

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    She herself ruled out having an election, which is a bit of a shame as we all love a good election night!
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129
    With the declarations at 94 Theresa + 22 Crabb and the likelyhood most of those would go to Theresa it is to be hoped that wise heads in the party put the National interest first and nominate Theresa unopposed so that we can have a cabinet and government in place by the end of this month. Would be well received by the Country and the markets. The nonsense that has been going on needs to be put behind us
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,920

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Going for EEA/EFTA will keep UKIP relevant. One of the main reasons that it's a bad idea.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    I thought I read yesterday that 40 odd of Bojo’s supporters moved to Gove when he announced he was standing? – must have got the wrong of the stick?
    I think potential Gove supporters are presently withholding support for fear of being seen as an ally of such a traitorous pig dog .... copyright TSE :smile:

    They may also be extremely concerned at being roped into a Gove event and then miss their summer holidays.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    It would be a masterstroke to have an election with Labour in the midst of a leadership contest.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931

    With the declarations at 94 Theresa + 22 Crabb and the likelyhood most of those would go to Theresa it is to be hoped that wise heads in the party put the National interest first and nominate Theresa unopposed so that we can have a cabinet and government in place by the end of this month. Would be well received by the Country and the markets. The nonsense that has been going on needs to be put behind us

    Hear, hear.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited July 2016
    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    not in terms of their current UKIP cohort - I make it a 100% loss.

    [I find your avatar a little disconcerting... might be time to get Ozzy's 'so money supermarket' photo back out on mine to offset it]
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    rcs1000 said:

    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    It would be a masterstroke to have an election with Labour in the midst of a leadership contest.
    A masterstroke of Osborne master strategist proportions?
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    Jason said:

    Sandpit said:

    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...

    Corbyn would have been long gone, if indeed ever elected, had he been a Tory. Labour just haven't got the stomach for this kind of stuff. They are all heart and no brain, but 'twas ever thus.
    I take it you like voting for a heartless Party....

    Not particularly, but even if I did, it's a million times more preferable to being brainless.

  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    Jason said:

    Sandpit said:

    Someone in Labour needs to be watching how the blue team do it. Process well under way with five candidates (and one conspicuous by his absence) and voting starts on Tuesday.

    Labour are all talking about a challenge, but all we've seen is a pile of resignations, a meaningless vote of confidence and a load of muttering about how someone should challenge him. Oh, and non-MP David Miliband at 8/1, what the...

    Corbyn would have been long gone, if indeed ever elected, had he been a Tory. Labour just haven't got the stomach for this kind of stuff. They are all heart and no brain, but 'twas ever thus.
    No. The Tories just have much better rules.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158

    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    not in terms of their current UKIP cohort - I make it a 100% loss.
    Heh.. I was thinking in proportion of the 100 MPs predicted, only a 1% loss on the target figure :p
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,409
    rcs1000 said:

    RodCrosby said:

    https://twitter.com/NaheemSays/status/748928507674320897
    KEEPCorbyn rally in Manchester...
    Liverpool's having one tomorrow.

    I suspect at least half of those people of being members of the Conservative Party
    I walked past them earlier, they have some very catchy tunes.

    Ruined my plans to have dinner in Piccadilly Gardens.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    She's what 16/17 MPs from being guaranteed a place in the final two
    And well over half yet to declare a preference.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    I fully agree that we need a contested leadership election. However I think that ought to include a candidate from the left other than Corbyn. Same (or similar) policy platform but a different (and better) front (wo)man.

    Put them in the mix with a candidate from the soft left, the centre and the right of the party - the best each strand has to offer - and we can have a contest based on policy, safe in the knowledge that all of the candidates have the leadership qualities needed to take them to No. 10.

    I can but hope.
  • YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158

    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    not in terms of their current UKIP cohort - I make it a 100% loss.

    [I find your avatar a little disconcerting... might be time to get Ozzy's 'so money supermarket' photo back out on mine to offset it]
    It was this, or her shoes... ;)
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    rcs1000 said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    There are at least seven idiots in the Conservative Party.
    Chortle ....
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    edited July 2016
    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    Yes the skids are under Carswell and about time. Nothing has pleased him about UKIP since the day he joined. So continuously has he attempted to undermine UKIP policies, that I wonder why he joined in the first place.

    And will @Scrapheap stop using my name in vain.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    edited July 2016

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.

    I had friends round for dinner on Wednesday night. They're both longstanding Labour members; she's a senior civil servant, and he's in publishing. They both voted for Corbyn. They both now believe that - while they continue to like him - he would be a disaster electorally. And they're right. Neither will vote for him again.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    I'm not sure. I think she'd win but the voters are very fickle right now.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.


    You must know Corbyn cannot ever win a GE, nor can anyone whom he nominates to follow him.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    rcs1000 said:

    With the declarations at 94 Theresa + 22 Crabb and the likelyhood most of those would go to Theresa it is to be hoped that wise heads in the party put the National interest first and nominate Theresa unopposed so that we can have a cabinet and government in place by the end of this month. Would be well received by the Country and the markets. The nonsense that has been going on needs to be put behind us

    Hear, hear.
    it would also put mensch and that cock richards back in their box which would be a twitter bonus...
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129

    How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?

    As TM has said a Brexiteer will be the chief negotiator that will not happen
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301

    rcs1000 said:

    RodCrosby said:

    https://twitter.com/NaheemSays/status/748928507674320897
    KEEPCorbyn rally in Manchester...
    Liverpool's having one tomorrow.

    I suspect at least half of those people of being members of the Conservative Party
    I walked past them earlier, they have some very catchy tunes.

    Ruined my plans to have dinner in Piccadilly Gardens.
    Is this one of their catchy tunes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgmMYsjCCJ0
  • JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    Agreed. Time to stop this nonsense.
  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    rcs1000 said:

    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    It would be a masterstroke to have an election with Labour in the midst of a leadership contest.
    Only if the Conservatives came out with an increased majority. Want to gamble on that? Not gamble money, mind, the country.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?

    Another possible reason for a quick election - do it before the people realise (The Tsipras strategy), But I sense little appetite for that.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.


    You must know Corbyn cannot ever win a GE, nor can anyone whom he nominates to follow him.
    Wrong - you should have seen the Corbynista journalist headbanger on This Week last night... they are not of this world. Turns out Thatcher caused the Brexit vote too.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.

    So the Corbynistas are bone idle entryists who don't even turn up to meetings. Thanks for confirming that Nick!
  • felix said:

    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    I'm not sure. I think she'd win but the voters are very fickle right now.
    I dont see the situation is the same. Cameron made it quite clear before the election that he would not see out this parliament.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655
    rcs1000 said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    There are at least seven idiots in the Conservative Party.
    Gerald Howarth

    On 20 May 2013, whilst debating the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, Howarth warned of "the aggressive homosexual community who see this as but a stepping stone to something even further." Howarth failed to clarify what the something further would be.

    Robert Goodwill

    In 2000 whilst working as a Conservative MEP, Goodwill sparked controversy when he was quoted as saying "I fly from Leeds/Bradford to Brussels and we get a set fee of around £500, but if I buy a cheaper ticket, economy class for about £160 and £250, I can pocket the difference and, as a capitalist, also as a British Conservative, I see it as a challenge to buy cheap tickets and make some profit on the system"

    David Nuttall

    In 2013 Nuttall was one of four MPs who camped outside Parliament in a move to facilitate parliamentary debate on what they called an “Alternative Queen’s Speech”—an attempt to show what a future Conservative government might deliver. Some 42 policies were listed including reintroduction of the death penalty and conscription, privatizing the BBC, banning the burka in public places and preparation to leave the European Union.

    Then again openly gay Iain Stewart was shortlisted by Stonewall for MP of the year in 2012, and he is a fox supporter..
  • YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740

    How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?

    As TM has said a Brexiteer will be the chief negotiator that will not happen
    I don't follow. How does a Brexiter in charge of negotiating the " Betrayal " stop those psychologically disposed to feeling betrayed feeling betrayed when they have been " Betrayed " ?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    MikeK said:

    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    Yes the skids are under Carswell and about time. Nothing has pleased him about UKIP since the day he joined. So continuously has he attempted to undermine UKIP policies, that I wonder why he joined in the first place.

    And will @Scrapheap stop using my name in vain.
    He's clearly schilling for Juncker.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,600

    I fully agree that we need a contested leadership election. However I think that ought to include a candidate from the left other than Corbyn. Same (or similar) policy platform but a different (and better) front (wo)man.

    Put them in the mix with a candidate from the soft left, the centre and the right of the party - the best each strand has to offer - and we can have a contest based on policy, safe in the knowledge that all of the candidates have the leadership qualities needed to take them to No. 10.

    I can but hope.

    That's looking like very wishful thinking right now. You're completely right of course, but until someone in the PLP gets off their arse and starts collecting signatures, it ain't gonna happen!
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,129

    How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?

    As TM has said a Brexiteer will be the chief negotiator that will not happen
    I don't follow. How does a Brexiter in charge of negotiating the " Betrayal " stop those psychologically disposed to feeling betrayed feeling betrayed when they have been " Betrayed " ?
    Well I pass on that one
  • How long before PM May faces a leadership challenge from a Leaver over an EEA " Betrayal " ?

    About 10 years.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,409
    rcs1000 said:

    MikeK said:

    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    Yes the skids are under Carswell and about time. Nothing has pleased him about UKIP since the day he joined. So continuously has he attempted to undermine UKIP policies, that I wonder why he joined in the first place.

    And will @Scrapheap stop using my name in vain.
    He's clearly schilling for Juncker.
    Have you spoken to your Dad, he rang me earlier.

    Wordpress issues.
  • ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Going for EEA/EFTA will keep UKIP relevant. One of the main reasons that it's a bad idea.
    There is enough getout of free movement in EEA/ EFTA rules to keep most people happy.

    And if in a few years once we are out and have RoW trade deals, if it becomes a nuisance we can reconsider EFTA/EEA again.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,999

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.


    You must know Corbyn cannot ever win a GE, nor can anyone whom he nominates to follow him.
    Winning elections is so 1997 - and look where that ended up.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    Agreed. Time to stop this nonsense.
    Blimey = we've been on opposite sides throughout the Brexit saga, and yet now are agreeing and coalescing around a May PM asap.... the power of the Tory party to be at each others throats and then come together... impressive.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    MikeK said:

    RobD said:

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Actually, a relatively small % hit, given the *ahem* ambitious target... :p
    Yes the skids are under Carswell and about time. Nothing has pleased him about UKIP since the day he joined. So continuously has he attempted to undermine UKIP policies, that I wonder why he joined in the first place.

    And will @Scrapheap stop using my name in vain.
    Going all a bit Plato with that last bit. People are allowed to quote others otherwise what's the point of the forum?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    Agreed. Time to stop this nonsense.
    Blimey = we've been on opposite sides throughout the Brexit saga, and yet now are agreeing and coalescing around a May PM asap.... the power of the Tory party to be at each others throats and then come together... impressive.
    And we were worried the Tory party was split forever!
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    PM May must put the national interest first and not indulge in yet another bout of unnecessary uncertainty. The government has the mandate from the people. Let them get on with it.

    Further since WWII all PM's taking office during a term have not called a general election - Eden, Macmillan, Home, Callaghan, Major, Brown and shortly May.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,600
    Tory ballot timescale: 1st ballot Tuesday drops one candidate, then Thursday another and we're down to 3 a week from now. So by Tuesday 12th at the latest we will have the two names for the members - earlier if someone drops out during the race.

    So, why are there eight weeks for that stage, surely it would be possible to do it in four?

    Election postal votes go out about three weeks before, even to overseas voters like me. I'd have no problem getting my vote back in the same timescale, so does anyone know why it's taking so long?

    I don't want to see a coronation (see Gordon Brown for why) but taking two months when there's plenty of stuff for the new PM to be doing, seems somewhat self indulgent by the party.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,419

    What we're seeing, and have been seeing for some time with NEC nominations, is that the ABC camp is better-organised at CLP meetings. That's not totally surprising, as we know that they have a larger share of longstanding members, and if you're a longstanding member then by definition you have a certain tolerance of branch and CLP meetings which eludes many new members. You may even attend them.

    But I'd be wary of extrapolating that to the membership and £3ers as a whole - even the least active member is quite capable of sending back a vote. The YouGov looks about right to me. The missing element is a persuasive challenger (or, so far, any challenger at all). A strong challenger who put up a persuasive platform could well win. But I don't think the membership will buy someone running predominantly on a Dump Jeremy ticket.

    Yes. I voted Corbyn but am open to voting for someone else.
    Am I being too optimistic in hoping for candidates to suggest what their plan for brexit is?
    I want to know where they stand on single market and immigration- I can't see how we can win without a clear position on those issues... at least Gove has a plan!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,717
    edited July 2016
    If Corbyn runs in a membership ballot yougov shows he would still win, even with a reduced majority and secure his mandate until the next general election. The only viable alternative is McDonnell if Corbyn stands down
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,655

    ooer.... Mike K's 100+ UKIP MPs could be about to have a large % hit to that target...

    https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748926554500009984

    Going for EEA/EFTA will keep UKIP relevant. One of the main reasons that it's a bad idea.
    There is enough getout of free movement in EEA/ EFTA rules to keep most people happy.

    And if in a few years once we are out and have RoW trade deals, if it becomes a nuisance we can reconsider EFTA/EEA again.
    It is not an a la carte menu !
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180

    felix said:

    Jason said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    If May had a serious challenger I say no.

    But presently it's like a 10,000 metre race with May a lap ahead and the others elbowing each off the track and looking suspiciously at Gove as he reaches for his ancestral skean dhu stuffed down his shorts.
    If the Tories do give her the crown unopposed, she MUST call an election immediately, and not make the mistake Brown did. This would surely condemn Labour to their biggest ever electoral defeat.

    I'm not sure. I think she'd win but the voters are very fickle right now.
    I dont see the situation is the same. Cameron made it quite clear before the election that he would not see out this parliament.
    I think you've replied to the wrong comment here :)
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    HYUFD said:

    If Corbyn runs in a membership ballot yougov shows he would still win, even with a reduced majority and secure his mandate until the next general election. The only viable alternative is McDonnell if Corbyn stands down

    You are assuming no change during the campaign.
  • DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    One example of a possible change came in a poll of members of the Unite union carried out over the past three days. While the union still officially backs Corbyn – its general secretary, Len McCluskey, has said rebel MPs are betraying the party – the poll found that almost half of members believe Corbyn should step down immediately.

    Of all Unite members polled, 49% said this should happen, with even 48% of those who said they voted Labour in 2015 agreeing. If there was a new leadership election, 44% of the Labour backers would oppose Corbyn, against 43% who would support him, the survey found.

    The poll has a relatively low sample of 775, but makes for difficult reading for the Corbyn camp. Of Labour voters, 61% think Corbyn is doing badly in the job, and only 20% of them think he will ever become prime minister.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    dr_spyn said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    She is reading your emails as you type.
    Snooper's Charter init.
  • RobD said:

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Nominations Numbers

    May 94 .. Crabb 22 .. Gove 18 .. Leadsom 18 .. Fox 7

    As posted earlier it is time for the party to elect Teresa unopposed and get on running the Country.
    Agreed. Time to stop this nonsense.
    Blimey = we've been on opposite sides throughout the Brexit saga, and yet now are agreeing and coalescing around a May PM asap.... the power of the Tory party to be at each others throats and then come together... impressive.
    And we were worried the Tory party was split forever!
    I think most of us have the sense to realise that at a time like this you need someone with a good cabinet record, no skeletons and an ability to negoitiate (no skeletons helps here).

    And she is about as pro EU as corbyn anyway.

    Also we have to join EFTA, anything else would be too far too fast and risk the economy which would play into the hands of socialist remainer doom mongers.

    And as I said above, there are freedom of movement getouts in EFTA and if it is still a big problem in a few years when we are out of the EU, have RoW trade deals etc, we can look at it again.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,409
    Labour’s deputy leader, Tom Watson, is urging colleagues to step back from the brink in challenging Jeremy Corbyn, warning that a leadership election in which the incumbent stands again could cause untold damage to the party.

    Watson is seeking to organise a meeting with Corbyn’s closest advisers to try to agree a negotiated settlement that would see the Labour leader step down voluntarily, thus avoiding an acrimonious and drawn-out battle.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/01/tom-watson-calls-on-labour-mps-to-prevent-leadership-contest?CMP=share_btn_tw
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    DanSmith said:

    One example of a possible change came in a poll of members of the Unite union carried out over the past three days. While the union still officially backs Corbyn – its general secretary, Len McCluskey, has said rebel MPs are betraying the party – the poll found that almost half of members believe Corbyn should step down immediately.

    Of all Unite members polled, 49% said this should happen, with even 48% of those who said they voted Labour in 2015 agreeing. If there was a new leadership election, 44% of the Labour backers would oppose Corbyn, against 43% who would support him, the survey found.

    The poll has a relatively low sample of 775, but makes for difficult reading for the Corbyn camp. Of Labour voters, 61% think Corbyn is doing badly in the job, and only 20% of them think he will ever become prime minister.

    I'm starting to think he might lose on a ballot. I wonder if the bunker are too? Cooper vs May would be good. Let's hope the membership come around.
  • Gove's Campaign Launch today:

    He stressed he “did not want” to be Prime Minister, adding: “Whatever charisma is I don’t have it, whatever glamour may be I don’t think anyone could ever associate me with it.”

    What a mess! - I'll give him two days, maximum, before he quits. His political career is over however you look at it, a complete self-destruct job.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    edited July 2016
    Duplication of @DanSmith post.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    Labour’s deputy leader, Tom Watson, is urging colleagues to step back from the brink in challenging Jeremy Corbyn, warning that a leadership election in which the incumbent stands again could cause untold damage to the party.

    Watson is seeking to organise a meeting with Corbyn’s closest advisers to try to agree a negotiated settlement that would see the Labour leader step down voluntarily, thus avoiding an acrimonious and drawn-out battle.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/01/tom-watson-calls-on-labour-mps-to-prevent-leadership-contest?CMP=share_btn_tw

    Labour’s deputy leader, Tom Watson, is urging colleagues to step back from the brink in challenging Jeremy Corbyn, warning that a leadership election in which the incumbent stands again could cause untold damage to the party.

    Watson is seeking to organise a meeting with Corbyn’s closest advisers to try to agree a negotiated settlement that would see the Labour leader step down voluntarily, thus avoiding an acrimonious and drawn-out battle.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/01/tom-watson-calls-on-labour-mps-to-prevent-leadership-contest?CMP=share_btn_tw

    Oooh
This discussion has been closed.