Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After the most dramatic post-war week in British politics t

1246

Comments

  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    Lowlander said:

    HYUFD said:

    Lowlander said:

    John_M said:

    Lowlander said:

    Scott_P said:

    Lowlander said:

    That's not good for Ruth.

    It's better for Ruth than Nicola
    Ruth just improved her party's fortunes for the first time in 30 years on the back of a single platform - stand up for the Union. It has been totally undermined and her position is holed below the waterline.

    If the EU tells Scotland it needs to be Independent to negotiate, then that is only good for Nicola. It means Independence is no longer a choice but a requirement. A requirement. It is also one likely to be supported with a heavy Yes vote.

    There is no scenario where Brexit is good for Ruth. And in all scenarios Brexit is good for Nicola.
    What's your view as to the SNP position on something like EFTA/EEA with FOMTW (Freedom of movement to work)? Good enough? Or not good enough?

    I should add that I fully support the idea of an independent Scotland, so this isn't some kind of Internet Point scoring exercise. We don't have much Scottish representation on here these days.
    After Independence is achieved I would vote no to EU membership (if it is not already in place) and yes to a full Norwegian/Icelandic EEA deal. I don't agree with the SNP but Independence is more important than the actual choice between EEA and full EU membership.

    The most important thing is to curtail the drain on Scotland's wealth and people which can only be achieved by Independence.
    If May gets an EFTA deal it is not impossible Scotland could very narrowly vote to stay in the UK rather than vote for independence just to join the EU. If there is no UK EFTA deal then I think an independence vote is inevitable
    An EFTA deal (Which means free movement) would kill the Tories and Labour with huge UKIP gains. It is very hard to see a Tory PM backing such a deal knowing what it will mean for his or her party.
    You might be right. However, I think there's some momentum behind the idea that it isn't freedom of movement, but freedom of movement to work. The EU might disagree of course, but there's still wiggle room, at least in theory.
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941
    I can't believe that terrible Portugal team have got through another round. Even England have played better than them.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    Pulpstar said:

    Why ?

    Why Lancaster ?
    Seems utterly bizarre.

    Mind you, it is the FA.
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    edited June 2016
    Pulpstar said:

    Why ?

    Why Lancaster ?
    I can only think this is because Lancaster graduated from coaching England age levels to the national side.

    Lancaster is arguably the best technical coach in the NHS, but he failed at the RWC.

    If England are looking at Southgate, similarly admired as a good coach at age grade, then Lancaster's brains are not bad ones to pick.
  • shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672
    Newsnight: Evan Davies leading (who'd of thought it) the panel discussion for... Theresa May.

    The Remainers choice apparently..

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/26/may-hails-benefits-of-sharia-as-inquiry-set-up-into-misuse-of-is/
  • ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,843

    Lowlander said:

    Jobabob said:


    I think it was more that Scotland couldn't automatically inherit the UK's membership rather than he would veto the membership of an independent Scotland. That was how I read it anyway.

    So a third poster has a third different interpretation of what Rajoy said.

    That only emphasises my point. Nicola only needs a credible objection to claims by whatever coalition No can form. She has that, whether people like it or not. Ruth lacks any cast iron argument, the only known known is that Scotland is out the EU if it remains in the UK as things stand.
    Don't get me wrong because I wish Scotland well and if I were a Scot I would be voting for independence. However, some of the issues raised in 2014 would still seem to be there, currency, oil price etc.. Economics may not for everyone be a reason to vote in a particular way, but I should have thought some answers would need to be provided to those issues which caused people to vote "No" last time.
    On currency, I think they will have to try and sell eventual euro membership. accepting future joining of the euro (it would never be straight away) may be a condition of the EU to accept Scotland inheriting non-schengen membership post-indy.

    On oil price they have to choose a different economic model. even if the price goes up people won't have confidence in it. that's gonna be the big problem to address.
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941
    FF43 said:


    The decision in principle to leave the UK and join/remain in the EU would have to be taken before the UK leaves the EU. Both points could be covered in one referendum and possibly one question to avoid an impractical outcome.

    That might depend on what the true position of the SNP hierarchy is.

    While the EU has always been a publicly fundamental part of Independence under the SNP package, the EEA option, out of CAP, out of CFP and with the ability to negotiate your own trade deals is clearly the best option for a heavy exporter like Scotland.
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941
    John_M said:


    You might be right. However, I think there's some momentum behind the idea that it isn't freedom of movement, but freedom of movement to work. The EU might disagree of course, but there's still wiggle room, at least in theory.

    Isn't that momentum coming from the same Westminster and Media bubbles who have just had their arses handed to them by the electorate?
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,120
    AnneJGP said:

    tyson said:

    Jobabob said:

    Jobabob said:

    I have a bad feeling that we will see a betrayal on brexit.

    Alastair campbell was on cnn earlier and he thinks we haven't seen nothing yet on the economy and Parliament will vote for another referendum

    What would it take for the Brexiteers to throw in their cards? How much economic turbulence, unemployment, market chaos and currency depression would it take before they thought, 'you know what, it just ain't worth it'. What's the threshold? If so, what is it?
    For me nothing that is at all likely to happen.
    Nor me, actually Richard. I am not predicting that. However, I am talking hypothetically, wondering where the threshold is...
    Well Carney talking of interest rates cuts is really quite frightening.

    Richard- how much of our economic prosperity is acceptable to pay for Brexit. I reckon after modest growth this quarter we'll have maybe 3 or 4 quarters of negative growth, reducing our GDP by about 6% from now, and about 10-12% where it should have been without this self inflicted injury. And then a couple of years of sluggish growth after- so maybe between 15-20% national cost to pay for Brexit.

    And by then, we may well be back in.
    I find it - odd - that very many peoples have been willing to lay down their lives for democracy, and yet we are so used to being comfortable that it's now by far the top priority for so many of us.

    But others can address the points so much better than I can, and it's time I was in bed.

    Goodnight, all.
    You can always count world events by economics. The 2nd World War destroyed about 40% of world GDP and about 6% of the world population. Doubtless Rod would disagree.

    The 2008 Banking Crisis destroyed about 10% OF world GDP.

    Brexit- I think will destroy about 10-15% (maybe as high as 20% of the UK's economy). That 10-15% doesn't come back. As the second world war, we just progress into the future a permanently poorer country.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    On topic, I'm glad to see the return of Mole Valley, what a delightfully named place.
  • perdixperdix Posts: 1,806
    John_M said:

    I was away while this came in a couple of hours ago:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36678222

    The European Union's top trade official says the UK cannot begin negotiating terms for doing business with the bloc until after it has left. "First you exit then you negotiate," Cecilia Malmstrom told BBC Newsnight.

    After Brexit, the UK would become a "third country" in EU terms, she said - meaning trade would be carried out based on World Trade Organisation rules until a new deal was complete.
    A recent trade deal with Canada took seven years to negotiate. The Canadian agreement will also require ratification by all EU countries, adding another one to two years before it takes effect. ...

    Under EU law, the bloc cannot negotiate a separate trade deal with one of its own members, hence the commissioner's insistence that the UK must first leave. It is also against EU law for a member to negotiate its own trade deals with outsiders, which means the UK cannot start doing this until after it has left the EU. Taken at face value, these rules mean the UK cannot conduct its own trade talks for up to two years - a fearsome challenge to any prime minister trying to deliver Brexit. ... [E]ven a Norway-style single market access deal, they caution, could take years to negotiate, leaving the UK trading on WTO terms in the meantime.


    What's the political upshot here? I'd be astonished if Germany, in particular, was looking forward to the idea of Britain sitting there on WTO terms for years, and if the new government wants to take the EEA route would rather maintain seamless continuity of Britain's membership of the single market rather than kick us out it via our EU exit then take us back into the EEA years later.

    Does this all have any implications for the argument over a Swiss/ Norwegian / Canadian style deal?

    I honestly don't know the implications of this stance. We tend to talk about trade with the 'EU', when of course, in practice the bulk of our trade is with a small number of countries - all the usual suspects: Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Ireland, Belgium and Sweden.

    As we run a hefty trade deficit with the EU (though a modest services surplus), this would put a definite crimp into those main partners. We're Germany's #3 export market, for example.

    These ridiculous restrictions on negotiations mean that we should not invoke article 50 until the situation is improved. The EU won't like the delay but they have to understand that this is the first time that a member has planned to leave.

  • The awful Matt Hancock on Newsnight, time to change channel.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    kle4 said:

    On topic, I'm glad to see the return of Mole Valley, what a delightfully named place.

    The name of the parliamentary seat was almost re-named Dorking and Leatherhead at the last review IIRC.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @MrHarryCole: Matt Hancock backs Theresa May live on Newsnight. Movement.

    Osbornites unite
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    I must say that if we end up EEA+ECHR+EFTA+FOM that will be fine, but what was the point leaving? Not much, most will think.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,120
    Lowlander said:

    I can't believe that terrible Portugal team have got through another round. Even England have played better than them.

    I don't think they've won a match yet

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,662
    kle4 said:

    On topic, I'm glad to see the return of Mole Valley, what a delightfully named place.

    Lib Dem gain I reckon.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    May PM, Osborne Chancellor.

    Lovely Jubbly
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    tyson said:

    Lowlander said:

    I can't believe that terrible Portugal team have got through another round. Even England have played better than them.

    I don't think they've won a match yet

    They haven't. They have drawn every single game, haven't they?
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    So when people say that George Osborne looks like Tyrion, what do they mean by that? As someone who has never seen Game Of Thrones.

    ?? I assume they mean he resembles the actor who plays Tyrion. Don't see it myself.
  • CornishBlueCornishBlue Posts: 840
    Jobabob said:

    I must say that if we end up EEA+ECHR+EFTA+FOM that will be fine, but what was the point leaving? Not much, most will think.

    No chance of sliding into irreversible federal political union.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

  • KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,917
    Evan Davis telling the Tories he wants them to ignore the EU ref result, basically.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,662
    Melanie Phillips in cloud cuckoo land.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    Jobabob said:

    HaroldO said:

    Speedy said:

    https://twitter.com/Peston/status/748607972385955841

    Corbyn winning the war with the MP's where it matters.

    If he does impose a deselection process he is going to have a turnover of MP's that would make Putin blush, where is he going to find these sacrificial lambs? And if he gets his followers to do it, how long before one of them says something massively stupid, or just plain acts like Ken?
    Well quite, and that's even if their CLPs would deselect rebels, which is far from certain. In many cases local MPs, while to the right of their CLPs, are hardworking and appreciated.

    Surely he knows the game is up?
    The game is up for the rebel MPs.

    They have thrown all they have at Corbyn but he remains.

    The rebels dare not make a democratic challenge because they know they will lose the vote of members.
    Seems that way. But if they've bottled even the attempt, I can't even feel sorry for them.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,662
    JohnO said:

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
    Gove next.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,768
    Grahame Morris MP: 'Colleagues subjected to incredible pressures' to abandon Corbyn.
  • David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Scott_P said:

    May PM, Osborne Chancellor.

    Lovely Jubbly

    Hammond Foreign Sec

    Remain full house.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

    I don't own a TV, but I make a point of getting the odd boxed set for my swanky PC. Game of Thrones is excellent. That said, I'm a fan of GRR Martin since waaaay before he turned to writing fantasy.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295
    Pulpstar said:

    JohnO said:

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
    Gove next.
    Gove has been consumed: Andrea is next. Then Hannan.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    Grahame Morris MP: 'Colleagues subjected to incredible pressures' to abandon Corbyn.

    Wimps.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,740
    Hancock goes for May.

    Looks like she'll get the vast majority of the cabinet.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    JohnO said:

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
    Am wavering John, as I heard this afternoon, a few journos are now reporting Gove wants to keep Osborne on as Chancellor.

    That's a potential gamechanger for me.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158
    MikeL said:

    Hancock goes for May.

    Looks like she'll get the vast majority of the cabinet.

    When are his Half Hours re-starting?
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    Ha!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    John_M said:


    We can argue about the effects of Brexit on the economy all the live-long day, but there's absolutely no doubt that the result has left Ruth up shit creek without the proverbial paddle.

    Yes. Undermined her ability to take the party onward north of the border, and even struggle to hold what they've gained. Unfortunate for her, as she seems to be a real talent.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    JohnO said:

    Then Hannan.

    Mr Hannan has returned early from his Twitter sojourn BTW
  • FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047
    Who will be the first Labour MP to join the Liberals?
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295

    JohnO said:

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
    Am wavering John, as I heard this afternoon, a few journos are now reporting Gove wants to keep Osborne on as Chancellor.

    That's a potential gamechanger for me.
    Just stop now; my vengeance has no bounds. None will be spared whatever their previous meritorious service :)

    Besides, aren't George's mates all defecting to Theresa?
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Question Time
    ...
    Comedian
    ...
    Anal Sex
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737

    Grahame Morris MP: 'Colleagues subjected to incredible pressures' to abandon Corbyn.

    Did he say from where?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,768
    Scott_P said:

    @richjm: Tony Blair hints at role as Brexit negotiator in EU talks https://t.co/5gRSwkqqP9

    Jezza is calling for his arrest on Wednesday isnt he
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Gove 9/1.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    edited June 2016
    If Corbyn has held on to most of those who voted for him last time, and tens of thousands more are joining to defend him, those dozens of MPs need to man up and form their own party, the tenor of many of them at Corbyn and what he is standing for precludes serving under him and staying in a party that overwhelmingly backs him.

    But if so many do, they won't take enough members or activists with them if they went, making it even less likely they would dare to do so. So presumably that means it's time for them to grab ankle, figuratively.
  • HaroldOHaroldO Posts: 1,185
    Ruth Davidson is in trouble north of the border but still has capital within the party, I cannot see her supporting Gove as a result. She will either keep schtum and attempt to patch up the torpedo strike in the hull or support May.
  • David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Conservative MPs may declare who they support publically but in a secret ballot who knows which way they actually voted?

    Best to declare publically for the favourite so they give you a job if they win but vote for who you actually want.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Time for bed, Lady Nugee is rabid tonight
  • KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,917
    edited June 2016
    Newsnight killing Gove.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    edited June 2016
    Fenman said:

    Who will be the first Labour MP to join the Liberals?

    Jamie Reed has the most vitriolic letter to Corbyn, accusing him and McDonnell of spreading poison through the party so if Corbyn wins one would think someone so angry at him would be at risk of leaving, but I've no idea if he is even close to the liberal position, and I'd imagine is in his head Labour forever, even if its members endorse a man he thinks is incompetent and a spreader of poison.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    JohnO said:

    JohnO said:

    I'm beginning to understand the French Revolution much better. It's some hours since some prominent figure suddenly met a gruesome fate and I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms.

    The referendum certainly appears to be devouring its own children.

    Poetic justice.
    Am wavering John, as I heard this afternoon, a few journos are now reporting Gove wants to keep Osborne on as Chancellor.

    That's a potential gamechanger for me.
    Just stop now; my vengeance has no bounds. None will be spared whatever their previous meritorious service :)

    Besides, aren't George's mates all defecting to Theresa?
    Yes they are.

    TM4PM

    I'm writing a piece for this weekend on why it has to be Theresa May.
  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    edited June 2016
    John_M said:

    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

    I don't own a TV, but I make a point of getting the odd boxed set for my swanky PC. Game of Thrones is excellent. That said, I'm a fan of GRR Martin since waaaay before he turned to writing fantasy.
    Mr. M, have you read the Accursed Kings series by Maurice Druon? The new kindle edition comes with a preface by GRR Martin in which he acknowledges it as his inspiration, for The Game of Thrones. It has got all the same ingredients except the Accursed Kings is based on real history - France in the XIVth century - a cracking read.

    It has been dramatised for TV twice, both in French. I remember seeing the 1960s version on BBC2 back then - first time nudity was shown on the Beeb I think.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,807
    Pulpstar said:

    D'acre stabs Sarah Vine :o

    He knows not of friendship...

  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158
    I have a feeling Emily Thornberry is about to find out why many Labour voters went for Leave.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,931
    Pulpstar said:

    Melanie Phillips in cloud cuckoo land.

    I have a friend in the IDF who regards her as enemy of Israel of the highest order. His view is that her - and people like her - poison the entire debate.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Paul Waugh is reporting lots of constituency Labour parties passing motions of no confidence in Jeremy Corbyn
  • valleyboyvalleyboy Posts: 606
    Jobabob said:

    tyson said:

    Lowlander said:

    I can't believe that terrible Portugal team have got through another round. Even England have played better than them.

    I don't think they've won a match yet

    They haven't. They have drawn every single game, haven't they?
    If my team can sneak past Belgium tomorrow I can see a Wales v Germany final. Amazing!
    Ps was in Bala, mid Wales today. The council have renamed the town BALE for the duration.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    edited June 2016

    John_M said:

    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

    I don't own a TV, but I make a point of getting the odd boxed set for my swanky PC. Game of Thrones is excellent. That said, I'm a fan of GRR Martin since waaaay before he turned to writing fantasy.
    Mr. M, have you read the Accursed Kings series by Maurice Druon? The new kindle edition comes with a preface by GRR Martin in which he acknowledges it as his inspiration, for The Game of Thrones.
    Presumably why they were reissued recently, which is nice.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    Please let it be McDonnell or Lewis

    @michaelsavage: Last-ditch plan to reach Corbyn exit deal: Moderates may guarantee hard-left a place in leadership race if he goes. Team Corbyn holding firm
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Lowlander said:

    FF43 said:


    The decision in principle to leave the UK and join/remain in the EU would have to be taken before the UK leaves the EU. Both points could be covered in one referendum and possibly one question to avoid an impractical outcome.

    That might depend on what the true position of the SNP hierarchy is.

    While the EU has always been a publicly fundamental part of Independence under the SNP package, the EEA option, out of CAP, out of CFP and with the ability to negotiate your own trade deals is clearly the best option for a heavy exporter like Scotland.
    Over 70% of Scotland's "heavy" exports are to the rest of the UK! Leaving the union for the prospect of a slightly better trading relationship with the EU would be an odd economic choice. The departure from the EU, and the rest of the UK's role in it, is being used as a justification for having another referendum - it is not a rational justification for promoting a Yes vote. Very much heart over head issue.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @EdArmston: Inspired by @HackneyAbbott speech at Hackney North's CLP meeting tonight. Passionate defence of #Corbyn which met with loud applause.

    @lukeakehurst: And then the left lost every vote https://t.co/YeHdzhGprK
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855
    Jobabob said:

    I must say that if we end up EEA+ECHR+EFTA+FOM that will be fine, but what was the point leaving? Not much, most will think.

    Would that include ECJ?
  • valleyboyvalleyboy Posts: 606

    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

    Neither have I

  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    kle4 said:

    John_M said:

    Just popping in to say that I have never seen Game of Thrones and therefore I haven't got a fecking clue what people are going on about.

    I don't own a TV, but I make a point of getting the odd boxed set for my swanky PC. Game of Thrones is excellent. That said, I'm a fan of GRR Martin since waaaay before he turned to writing fantasy.
    Mr. M, have you read the Accursed Kings series by Maurice Druon? The new kindle edition comes with a preface by GRR Martin in which he acknowledges it as his inspiration, for The Game of Thrones.
    Presumably why they were reissued recently, which is nice.
    Yup, I found the books in the kindle store last year, at a very reasonable price too.
  • JobabobJobabob Posts: 3,807
    valleyboy said:

    Jobabob said:

    tyson said:

    Lowlander said:

    I can't believe that terrible Portugal team have got through another round. Even England have played better than them.

    I don't think they've won a match yet

    They haven't. They have drawn every single game, haven't they?
    If my team can sneak past Belgium tomorrow I can see a Wales v Germany final. Amazing!
    Ps was in Bala, mid Wales today. The council have renamed the town BALE for the duration.
    Yes, you have a real chance! Good luck sir.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    @SamCoatesTimes: Tonight's poll was taken over Monday to Thursday this week
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,855

    Please let it be McDonnell or Lewis

    @michaelsavage: Last-ditch plan to reach Corbyn exit deal: Moderates may guarantee hard-left a place in leadership race if he goes. Team Corbyn holding firm

    It would seem to be the best solution - if a hard left candidate would win, the rebels would have to at least give them a chance, and if they were competent they'd be quieted, but it gives them a chance to try to win as well - but I guess it does come down to trust. Will enough nominate a hard left candidate?
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158
    I wonder how many of them are recent shadow cabinet ministers.....
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    edited June 2016

    Please let it be McDonnell or Lewis

    @michaelsavage: Last-ditch plan to reach Corbyn exit deal: Moderates may guarantee hard-left a place in leadership race if he goes. Team Corbyn holding firm

    What a joke.

    "We're losers who can't beat you. But please stand down, and we'll allow a lefty whom we can beat to stand..."
  • HaroldOHaroldO Posts: 1,185
    Rees-Mogg is 47 years old, he has been 70 since birth. I bet he was born wearing socks garters.

    Was fun watching Evan trying to get the pair to fight on Newsnight, they were not interested.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    HaroldO said:

    Ruth Davidson is in trouble north of the border but still has capital within the party, I cannot see her supporting Gove as a result. She will either keep schtum and attempt to patch up the torpedo strike in the hull or support May.

    I thought she was supporting Crabb?
  • valleyboyvalleyboy Posts: 606
    Emergency meeting of my CLP tomorrow. I am afraid that I will have to give it a miss, footie takes priority. Little doubt JC will be well supported
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,725
    edited June 2016
    Lowlander said:

    HYUFD said:

    Lowlander said:

    John_M said:

    Lowlander said:

    Scott_P said:

    Lowlander said:

    That's not good for Ruth.

    It's better for Ruth than Nicola
    Ruth just improved her party's fortunes for the first time in 30 years on the back of a single platform - stand up for the Union. It has been totally undermined and her position is holed below the waterline.

    If the EU tells Scotland it needs to be Independent to negotiate, then that is only good for Nicola. It means Independence is no longer a choice but a requirement. A requirement. It is also one likely to be supported with a heavy Yes vote.

    There is no scenario where Brexit is good for Ruth. And in all scenarios Brexit is good for Nicola.
    What's your view as to the SNP position on something like EFTA/EEA with FOMTW (Freedom of movement to work)? Good enough? Or not good enough?

    I should add that I fully support the idea of an independent Scotland, so this isn't some kind of Internet Point scoring exercise. We don't have much Scottish representation on here these days.
    After Independence is achieved I would vote no to EU membership (if it is not already in place) and yes to a full Norwegian/Icelandic EEA deal. I don't agree with the SNP but Independence is more important than the actual choice between EEA and full EU membership.

    The most important thing is to curtail the drain on Scotland's wealth and people which can only be achieved by Independence.
    If May gets an EFTA deal it is not impossible Scotland could very narrowly vote to stay in the UK rather than vote for independence just to join the EU. If there is no UK EFTA deal then I think an independence vote is inevitable
    An EFTA deal (Which means free movement) would kill the Tories and Labour with huge UKIP gains. It is very hard to see a Tory PM backing such a deal knowing what it will mean for his or her party.
    Well no EFTA deal could kill the country! UKIP may be guaranteed a quarter of the vote at the next election as a result but as that would come for Labour as much as if not more than the Tories a Tory PM like May can afford to take the risk
  • David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Fenman said:

    Who will be the first Labour MP to join the Liberals?


    Labour is authoritarian, centralist amnd statist. Liberals are the opposite.

    If the Liberals are wise they won't accept any Labour MPs. There are entry checks.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    PMSL now

    @NadineDorriesMP: So, it would appear that George Osborne was the machiavelli behind Gove's announcement.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    Scott_P said:

    PMSL now

    @NadineDorriesMP: So, it would appear that George Osborne was the machiavelli behind Gove's announcement.

    Called it
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Poetic Justice?

    Standard and Poors has cut the EU's credit rating.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @BBCNewsnight: "It was a spectacular miscalculation" - former communications director for Boris on his decision to back #Brexit
  • HaroldOHaroldO Posts: 1,185
    alex. said:

    HaroldO said:

    Ruth Davidson is in trouble north of the border but still has capital within the party, I cannot see her supporting Gove as a result. She will either keep schtum and attempt to patch up the torpedo strike in the hull or support May.

    I thought she was supporting Crabb?
    I missed that then, didn't think she had got involved yet.
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941
    edited June 2016
    Great stuff

    https://twitter.com/tomtomtalks1/status/748613979539398656

    Lady Dugdale was next to rise. “Do I have your word that you will not betray our cause and the integrity of these four kingdoms, now and always?” she asked Sturgeon.

    “Well, for now,”she replied.

    “Good enough for me,” said Dugdale. “THE QUEEN IN THE NORTH!”
  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    Scott_P said:

    PMSL now

    @NadineDorriesMP: So, it would appear that George Osborne was the machiavelli behind Gove's announcement.

    So she has read the article in the Telegraph, put her own spin on it and tweeted. Read the article and make your own mind up.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295

    Scott_P said:

    PMSL now

    @NadineDorriesMP: So, it would appear that George Osborne was the machiavelli behind Gove's announcement.

    Called it
    One has to wonder whether Gove was deliberately set up by Osborne (and Cameron?) as they are now appear to be flocking to Theresa.

    Revenge is usually served cold, but I guess needs must.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,768
    Matt Singh ‏@MattSingh_ 5m5 minutes ago
    Labour leadership poll coming up...
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @SamCoatesTimes: Times / YouGov poll of Labour members

    Result 1: Members narrowly back Corbyn if challenged in a ballot 50 to 47 https://t.co/NOjkiQ51NX
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    edited June 2016
    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    PMSL now

    @NadineDorriesMP: So, it would appear that George Osborne was the machiavelli behind Gove's announcement.

    Called it
    One has to wonder whether Gove was deliberately set up by Osborne (and Cameron?) as they are now appear to be flocking to Theresa.

    Revenge is usually served cold, but I guess needs must.
    There's an Australian chap, who is fond of cats, who has shocking polling about Michael Gove, that might get widely shared
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,768
    RodCrosby said:

    Grahame Morris MP: 'Colleagues subjected to incredible pressures' to abandon Corbyn.

    Did he say from where?
    No just from PLP colleagues
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    So she has read the article in the Telegraph, put her own spin on it and tweeted. Read the article and make your own mind up.

    Oh, it doesn't matter if Osborne is behind it or not. Nad's reaction is the prize.

  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,807

    There is nothing beautiful about collectivism. There is something beautiful about taking responsibility for yourselves.

    "Taking responsibility for oneself" requires a) an acknowledgement of the truth, b) identifying problems, and c) acquiring the skills and resources to overcome them. Since the ref, a) has been poor, people have preferred to deny b), and c) seems to be entirely lacking
  • David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    edited June 2016
    Scott_P said:

    @SamCoatesTimes: Times / YouGov poll of Labour members

    Result 1: Members narrowly back Corbyn if challenged in a ballot 50 to 47 https://t.co/NOjkiQ51NX

    Using which candidate against Corbyn?

    Edit - Thanks for the statistics
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    Oh yes please - a full leadership contest with Corbyn narrowly hanging on would be fantastic. (For the Tories).
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Corbyn is seriously beatable on those numbers.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,418
    @SamCoatesTimes: Times / YouGov Lab members poll

    Result 4: Big big drop in Corbyn approval ratings - but he's still a net positive!

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmO1WvBXIAER0jH.jpg
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Surely attempting to poll the Labour selectorate is about the most impossible polling exercise?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,922
    Scott_P said:

    So she has read the article in the Telegraph, put her own spin on it and tweeted. Read the article and make your own mind up.

    Oh, it doesn't matter if Osborne is behind it or not. Nad's reaction is the prize.
    It's ironic that she was weeping for an arrogant, posh Bullingdon boy today.
This discussion has been closed.