Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As the debate over EVEL grips the nation here’s the Marf vi

1235»

Comments

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Dair said:

    Are people not noticing.

    The average for the SNP is ~48% in the seats polled. And they've won all but one.

    The national average poll for the SNP is in this range.

    It's not just here and these were postulated as the seats there would be a concentrated SNP vote diluting the vote elsewhere. But the only real outcome you can see is that it's EVERYWHERE and in most places the SNP don't need anything close to ~48%.

    There's nowhere else for the SNP to have concentrated results to even this out. Maybe one or two of the seats they hold, maybe. But that's not enough to balance this out. This result does seem to indicate SNP 55 is very likely.

    William Hill offering a market

    http://www.williamhill.com/nui/f20-free-bet-acc#http://sports.williamhill.com/bet/EN/addtoslip?action=BuildSlip&sel=787823591&price=y&ew=n&url=http://sports.williamhill.com/bet/en/betting/
  • In nearly every one of these seats - these seats! - voters prefer DC to EM. Miliband scrapes a tie in Glasgow North.

    Astonishing.

    The thought occurs that the SNP could state explicitly that their price for a SNP-Lab coalition would be a new Labour leader. "Vote SNP, lose Miliband, get a Labour-SNP government"
    *coughs and draws attention to this morning's discussion*

    I've got a 10/1 bet that all three of Nick Clegg, David Cameron and Ed Miliband will go this year. I'm happy enough with that.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    antifrank said:

    In nearly every one of these seats - these seats! - voters prefer DC to EM. Miliband scrapes a tie in Glasgow North.

    Astonishing.

    The thought occurs that the SNP could state explicitly that their price for a SNP-Lab coalition would be a new Labour leader. "Vote SNP, lose Miliband, get a Labour-SNP government"
    *coughs and draws attention to this morning's discussion*

    I've got a 10/1 bet that all three of Nick Clegg, David Cameron and Ed Miliband will go this year. I'm happy enough with that.
    They better all stay till the GE though !
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    LDs could be reduced to Orkney & Shetland, as they were at the 2011 Holyrood election IIRC.
  • Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    In nearly every one of these seats - these seats! - voters prefer DC to EM. Miliband scrapes a tie in Glasgow North.

    Astonishing.

    The thought occurs that the SNP could state explicitly that their price for a SNP-Lab coalition would be a new Labour leader. "Vote SNP, lose Miliband, get a Labour-SNP government"
    *coughs and draws attention to this morning's discussion*

    I've got a 10/1 bet that all three of Nick Clegg, David Cameron and Ed Miliband will go this year. I'm happy enough with that.
    They better all stay till the GE though !
    Agreed!
  • antifrank said:

    Charles Kennedy looks in real trouble in his seat if the poll in Danny Alexander's seat is any guide.

    On the other hand, he hasn't spent 5 years as Chief Secretary, and he has an extra 15% of cushion. I reckon he'll be ok but 1/3 makes little appeal.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    Yes, middle-class East voted No by a big margin and working-class West voted No narrowly.
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    Dair said:

    Dair said:

    hunchman said:

    What's striking about so many of those constituency polls is just how low the totals are for the Tories, Lib Dems and others in the SLAB SNP battle. So little pro-unionist vote for SLAB to squeeze in theory. Look at Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill as an example, just 12% there as an example. A lot of lost deposits for the Lib Dems!

    If the Scottish pattern follows for the Lib Dems across England then in seats they don't currently hold they will lose their deposit in every one. That;s 500+ lost deposits. Over £1m. Can they even afford that?
    £500 per deposit makes £250k for 500 lost deposits.

    Since the deposits are paid upfront then we'll see if the Lib Dems can afford it or not by whether they stand candidates.
    My error, thought it was £2k for some reason.
    It's still cheap to stand for Parliament. If the deposit had kept pace since 1918 it would now be somewhere between £6k and £46k...
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    AndyJS said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    Yes, middle-class East voted No by a big margin and working-class West voted No narrowly.
    East Dunbartonshire is split between the wealthier Milngavie and Bearsden in it's west and Kirkintilloch/Bishopbriggs/Lennoxtown in the east. It voted 43% Yes.

    Currently it is a Liberal marginal over Labour. The SNP were 4th. The Yes vote is not tiny, the Liberals in adjacent North Glasgow have just been wiped out. A whole lot of Milngavie and Bearsden REALLY don't like Labour.

    Has to be an SNP gain.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    £240 on Cumbernauld Kintilloch East and Kilbryde. Limited by Betfair to £40 on the last go.

    Job done.
  • tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,565
    One of the most game-changing opinion polls I've ever seen. take that, daily Yougov.

    The figures that stand out for me is which parties have contacted voters. LDs strong in their 2 seats, but SNP dominant everywhere. These are in areas with Lab MPs and councillors, and some SNP candidates not selected. For the SNP to win the ground game is vital against the SLAB machine - so they can keep momentum up right to polling day
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Btw this could well wipe out Labour's vote/seat advantage
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    tpfkar said:

    One of the most game-changing opinion polls I've ever seen. take that, daily Yougov.

    The figures that stand out for me is which parties have contacted voters. LDs strong in their 2 seats, but SNP dominant everywhere. These are in areas with Lab MPs and councillors, and some SNP candidates not selected. For the SNP to win the ground game is vital against the SLAB machine - so they can keep momentum up right to polling day

    That's what the membership surge is doing for them.

    Must feel great to be backing someone other than Labour in Scotland now, a real sense of optimism - Scottish Labour is THE most negative party ever !
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    SeanT said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    He's going to lose 30ish seats in Scotland (wiping out much of Labour's FPTP advantage, btw).. Yes, this does him serious damage. Today's YouGov has him tied with Cameron, and we all know he suffers in the limelight. Imagine an election campaign?

    Right now, gun to my head, if forced, I would predict a very narrow Tory plurality, and Cameron remaining in Number 10.

    But my official prediction is: I haven't got a clue.
    Scotland does nothing for a Conservative plurality ;)

    But Labour's morale is going to be tonked.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    SeanT said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    He's going to lose 30ish seats in Scotland (wiping out much of Labour's FPTP advantage, btw).. Yes, this does him serious damage. Today's YouGov has him tied with Cameron, and we all know he suffers in the limelight. Imagine an election campaign?

    Right now, gun to my head, if forced, I would predict a very narrow Tory plurality, and Cameron remaining in Number 10.

    But my official prediction is: I haven't got a clue.
    It certainly is tough to call... I just get the impression cameron will find it hard to get coalition partners this time, but am guessing as much as anyone else
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    tpfkar said:

    One of the most game-changing opinion polls I've ever seen. take that, daily Yougov.

    The figures that stand out for me is which parties have contacted voters. LDs strong in their 2 seats, but SNP dominant everywhere. These are in areas with Lab MPs and councillors, and some SNP candidates not selected. For the SNP to win the ground game is vital against the SLAB machine - so they can keep momentum up right to polling day

    What SLAB machine?

    They have barely needed to campaign in any seat for 40 years. They have no members. All they have is fading The Daily Record and #BBCbias and that is not going to be as blatant as it was during indyref.
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    The poll says 79% of people hadn't been contacted by any party?

    Begs the question what Scottish Labour are doing though, they're meant to be going out all out to rescue the situation, especially in the winnable seats.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Betfair sportsbook has pulled all it's Scottish markets.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Will we see a big over-reaction in the Ed PM market tommorow ?
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    edited February 2015
    BTW Ashcroft is weighting by 2010 recall. So the likelihood is the SNP are actually doing BETTER than these figures show.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Dair said:

    BTW Ashcroft is weighting by 2010 recall. So the likelihood is the SNP are actually doing BETTER than these figures show.

    He'll hold his seat but taking the 1-14 on Carmichael in Orkney and Shetland is the route to the poorhouse right now.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited February 2015
    YouGov are picking up a 21.5% national swing. Ashcroft is picking up a 24% swing in the 13 Labour seats he polled [and there will be a few more that fit the profile]. The implication is to expect about 19-20% elsewhere.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited February 2015
    Pulpstar said:

    Btw this could well wipe out Labour's vote/seat advantage

    Yup. Scotland was one of the main reasons they had that advantage in the first place: they've always managed to sweep the table in Scotland despite doing relatively mediocre in voteshare (they've never - NEVER - got over 50% in Scotland, a threshold that in their best elections they clear with ease in Wales and Northern England).
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Dair said:

    BTW Ashcroft is weighting by 2010 recall. So the likelihood is the SNP are actually doing BETTER than these figures show.

    I'll take the SNP matching these figures in May ta very much, hope people are putting in the ground work.

    LOL How on earth will Labour know how to fight in Coatbridge. Almost an East Ham size majority there last time !!!
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    YouGov are picking up a 21.5% national swing. Ashcroft is picking up a 24% swing in the 13 Labour seats he polled [and there will be a few more that fit the profile]. The implication is to expect about 20% elsewhere.

    Yes the swing in the Edinburgh area won't be as high.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    That said Artist does make a good point. If every SNP voter who says they'd "consider" voting Labour actually did so (without Labour losing any votes they currently have), that would be enough to save all those seats bar Dundee West.

    That's the straw Labour can clutch at, anyway, to stop them all jumping out the office windows tomorrow.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Danny565 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Btw this could well wipe out Labour's vote/seat advantage

    Yup. Scotland was one of the main reasons they had that advantage in the first place: they've always managed to sweep the table in Scotland despite doing relatively mediocre in voteshare (they've never - NEVER - got over 50% in Scotland, a threshold that in their best elections they clear with ease in Wales and Northern England).
    This is precisely why I laid off the Votes/Seats switcheroo on the Betfair Electoral Bias market.

    God Bless that market.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    Did you mis-type? Of course it makes a difference. Ed won't be PM with these figures.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited February 2015
    Just look at the Coatbridge result again:

    2010 result: Lab 67%, SNP 17%. Labour lead 50%.

    Ashcroft polling: SNP 46%, Lab 43%. SNP lead 3%.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    AndyJS said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    Did you mis-type? Of course it makes a difference. Ed won't be PM with these figures.
    Of course he will. It potentially improves change his chance of being PM due to 55 SNP being better than 41 Labour and 11 Liberal. It hurts Cameron as he loses between 10 and 11 potential Liberal allies.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    AndyJS said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    Did you mis-type? Of course it makes a difference. Ed won't be PM with these figures.
    I've laid off some at 2.28 in the next PM market, hopefully can reback higher again tommorow.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    LDs drop from 31% to 4% in Glasgow North.

    This borders East Dunbartonshire, Jo Swinson's seat. And the border is not particularly different in terms of demographic.

    East Dunbartonshire is going SNP not Labour.
    Wasn't there a big No vote in East Dunbartonshire ?
    This isn't about YES or NO, it's about Ask the Audience, the Wisdom of Crowds. If you are a Scottish voter, the best way to get a good deal for Scotland, and yourself, is to vote SNP in 2015, as that will exert maximum leverage on a likely weak Westminster English government (whether Labour or Tory). Thus the Scots voter is acting intelligently, ensuring a generous deal for his or her country.

    Will the Scots vote for the (now income tax raising) SNP in Holyrood in such numbers in 2016? Highly unlikely. I can't see the logic, unless you are desperate for another immediate referendum so you can vote YES (to which end, see the price of oil, and continuing chaos in euroland).

    Labour will be wiped out in 2015, but I suspect they will return to Holyrood in numbers a year later.

    Of course that is too late for Miliband, Difficult to see him winning in 2015 on these stats.
    Still think this doesn't really nause Milibands chances of being PM to be honest
    Did you mis-type? Of course it makes a difference. Ed won't be PM with these figures.
    Of course he will. It potentially improves change his chance of being PM due to 55 SNP being better than 41 Labour and 11 Liberal. It hurts Cameron as he loses between 10 and 11 potential Liberal allies.
    I don't think it does much to his chances either BUT THE MARKETS WILL THINK THAT.

    Could be a great time to back Ed Mili PM tommorow, hoping for a drift.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    Pulpstar said:

    Betfair sportsbook has pulled all it's Scottish markets.

    I know, I was having fun.
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    AndyJS said:

    Just look at the Coatbridge result again:

    2010 result: Lab 67%, SNP 17%. Labour lead 50%.

    Ashcroft polling: SNP 46%, Lab 43%. SNP lead 3%.

    Tight, and remember a Labour win is a win...
  • I take it that Mike is now a believer in the SNP surge!

    I think there is something in the YES/NO areas but only in size of relative swing. The SNP vote is up by nearly 20 per cent everywhere and that will be enough to carry them to victory just about everywhere. And so while the swing might be less in say some of the Edinburgh seats they don't need more than 35-40 per cent against a divided opposition.
  • Now seen the full Ashcroft tables.

    The absolutely key thing is that they have weighted by 2010 which means that the swing is UNDERESTIMATED in virtually every seat. The reason is false recall from 2010-2011 as all pollsters have found. Obviously this applies most in seats where the SNP did very well in 2011 and so the SNP is adjusted down in, for example, Gordon from the raw data.

    In other words if you can get say an evens bet on Salmond taking more than 50 per cent of the vote in Gordon then take it and go all in. The best bet at the odds overall must be Cumbernauld.
This discussion has been closed.