The Pistorius trial has been perfect evidence of how dreadful it would be if we let cameras into British courts.
Saturation coverage on news channels, most people won't see enough to get any real sense of proceedings, and the major news broadcasts (at 10, say) will put it together into a small summary of video which may or may not give a fair reflection of how things have gone.
@faisalislam: ..So RBS havent said publicly or to staff there will be "no impact" on jobs. Fwiw, typically moves like this mean a few hundred not 1000s..
Those just in too
James Cook @BBCJamesCook · 53 mins RBS chief exec to staff: moving registered office post-independence “is not an intention to move operations or jobs.” #indyref #RBS
James Cook @BBCJamesCook · 54 mins RBS chief exec Ross McEwan to staff: re-domiciling would be a “technical procedure” re location of “registered head office.” #indyref
It might not move operations or jobs but it would sure move tax.
I'm lovin' this - I haven't laughed so much in ages. This is so absurd way back when SIndy was first being debated here. That it hasn't moved on much since just makes it even more bizarre and comical.
This is an even more facile argument. Lenders will think and do as we believe they will. End of.
Q: “But if Scotland didn’t accept any of the UK’s national debt, wouldn’t it be punished by the international markets? Why would anyone lend Scotland money?”
A: Because it’s not Scotland’s debt. Scotland had no say over it being taken out - it’s the UK government’s debt, the UK decided where to spend it and the UK has already accepted full liability for it. If you’re living in a rented flat and the landlord defaults on his mortgage, YOU don’t get a bad credit rating.
Lenders don’t care in the least about the UK’s internal political wrangles - they lend based on whether they think they’ll get paid back or not, and Scotland is a wealthy country with plenty of security for any debt it took out. It would be a very low risk for any lender.
But as we explored in Chapter 2, an independent Scotland would be likely to need far less lending anyway, so even if it had to pay slightly higher interest on its borrowing it could afford to do so.
I actually think that whereas constitutional reform has always languished down the bottom of the list of voter concerns, that is no longer the case now. 5m Scots have been electrified by the current debate, and England seems to have woken from its slumbers.
If it's a No, we're headed for a federal UK, I think there's no doubt about it, because that's the only logical destination on the current direction of travel (that all 3 parties are now signed up to, and which the Nats in Scotland and Wales ultimately wanted all along anyway).
Quite how that is going to work though with the possibility of a UK-wide administration setting overall policies which are at odds with whatever force emerges in England-alone, I don't know!
And aside from places like Cornwall and Yorkshire, I can't imagine there being too much enthusiasm for splitting England up into federal units. We also should remember John Prescott failed spectacularly at introducing regional assemblies, although granted time has moved on now and this was before the current Scottish developments...
Even if you did carve England up is the ( virtually permanently Tory with a UKIP opposition?) SE Region Parliament going to be able to vary income tax in the same way that Scotland can? And what happens when the push taxes down (as they will)? We could have tax completion between different parts of the island of Great Britain. It's Balkanisation writ small if we are not very careful.
The trouble with a federation that splits out London is that London votes Labour. So you'd have the acute problem that the cash generator of the UK economy would potentially be subjected to envy taxes voted for by people who couldn't care less if this does a Francois Hollande to London, because as a class they themselves are always takers rather than payers of tax. If this killed the City they'd just demand that someone else they envy be taxed instead.
It's a bit too simplistic to say 'London votes Labour' - London has voted for Boris twice!
Truer to say London leans Labour. It has 28 Conservative MPs, hundreds of Conservative councillors, and the Conservatives and UKIP can expect to win c. 40% of the vote between them, next year.
But the right wing split in London is very much more pro-European than in the rest of the UK
That's certainly true. Someone like Mark Field is probably the archetypal representative of their viewpoint.
@faisalislam: ..So RBS havent said publicly or to staff there will be "no impact" on jobs. Fwiw, typically moves like this mean a few hundred not 1000s..
Scott has got a new pal, since he found twitter he has not be a sad lonely creep ever again, he has lots of friends to follow.
I actually think that whereas constitutional reform has always languished down the bottom of the list of voter concerns, that is no longer the case now. 5m Scots have been electrified by the current debate, and England seems to have woken from its slumbers.
If it's a No, we're headed for a federal UK, I think there's no doubt about it, because that's the only logical destination on the current direction of travel (that all 3 parties are now signed up to, and which the Nats in Scotland and Wales ultimately wanted all along anyway).
Quite how that is going to work though with the possibility of a UK-wide administration setting overall policies which are at odds with whatever force emerges in England-alone, I don't know!
And aside from places like Cornwall and Yorkshire, I can't imagine there being too much enthusiasm for splitting England up into federal units. We also should remember John Prescott failed spectacularly at introducing regional assemblies, although granted time has moved on now and this was before the current Scottish developments...
Even if you did carve England up is the ( virtually permanently Tory with a UKIP opposition?) SE Region Parliament going to be able to vary income tax in the same way that Scotland can? And what happens when the push taxes down (as they will)? We could have tax completion between different parts of the island of Great Britain. It's Balkanisation writ small if we are not very careful.
The trouble with a federation that splits out London is that London votes Labour. So you'd have the acute problem that the cash generator of the UK economy would potentially be subjected to envy taxes voted for by people who couldn't care less if this does a Francois Hollande to London, because as a class they themselves are always takers rather than payers of tax. If this killed the City they'd just demand that someone else they envy be taxed instead.
It's a bit too simplistic to say 'London votes Labour' - London has voted for Boris twice!
Truer to say London leans Labour. It has 28 Conservative MPs, hundreds of Conservative councillors, and the Conservatives and UKIP can expect to win c. 40% of the vote between them, next year.
But the right wing split in London is very much more pro-European than in the rest of the UK
I actually think that whereas constitutional reform has always languished down the bottom of the list of voter concerns, that is no longer the case now. 5m Scots have been electrified by the current debate, and England seems to have woken from its slumbers.
If it's a No, we're headed for a federal UK, I think there's no doubt about it, because that's the only logical destination on the current direction of travel (that all 3 parties are now signed up to, and which the Nats in Scotland and Wales ultimately wanted all along anyway).
Quite how that is going to work though with the possibility of a UK-wide administration setting overall policies which are at odds with whatever force emerges in England-alone, I don't know!
And aside from places like Cornwall and Yorkshire, I can't imagine there being too much enthusiasm for splitting England up into federal units. We also should remember John Prescott failed spectacularly at introducing regional assemblies, although granted time has moved on now and this was before the current Scottish developments...
Even if you did carve England up is the ( virtually permanently Tory with a UKIP opposition?) SE Region Parliament going to be able to vary income tax in the same way that Scotland can? And what happens when the push taxes down (as they will)? We could have tax completion between different parts of the island of Great Britain. It's Balkanisation writ small if we are not very careful.
The trouble with a federation that splits out London is that London votes Labour. So you'd have the acute problem that the cash generator of the UK economy would potentially be subjected to envy taxes voted for by people who couldn't care less if this does a Francois Hollande to London, because as a class they themselves are always takers rather than payers of tax. If this killed the City they'd just demand that someone else they envy be taxed instead.
It's a bit too simplistic to say 'London votes Labour' - London has voted for Boris twice!
Truer to say London leans Labour. It has 28 Conservative MPs, hundreds of Conservative councillors, and the Conservatives and UKIP can expect to win c. 40% of the vote between them, next year.
But the right wing split in London is very much more pro-European than in the rest of the UK
That's certainly true. Someone like Mark Field is probably the archetypal representative of their viewpoint.
Even more reason to bring in some eurosceptic parts of the home counties...
I just had a quick flick through that Wee Blue Book. It's hilarious. Full of unsubstantiated 'facts', reverse scaremongering and wishful thinking.
Some of it doesn't even try to put a coherent counter argument. My favourite one was on borders if Scotland joins Schengen and takes out a different immigration policy: it doesn't claim that this wouldn't happen, just that it's be too much hassle to build and police a border so the English wouldn't bother.
"Mr Salmond says the people of Scotland will endorse a Yes vote because they know they can govern better than Westminster. Positive engagement rather than public schoolboy politics is the way to boost European Union relations, he adds."
Climb every mountain, ford every stream, follow every byway, til you find your...continued on page 94.
Interesting to run through the figures here, and how these figures can change from instant response within a few days.
With the excitement and panic over IndyRef polls in the last few days it's foolish to speculate even on a 24 hour period when things are as febrile as they are now. I'd be interested on the gains and losses in betting by PBers these last 5 days.
Ipsos MORI @IpsosMORI 55m From our archives: How did Britons react to #911 one week later? http://bit.ly/1lVOrYC #911anniversary Expand
I actually think that whereas constitutional reform has always languished down the bottom of the list of voter concerns, that is no longer the case now. 5m Scots have been electrified by the current debate, and England seems to have woken from its slumbers. >
Even if you did carve England up is the ( virtually permanently Tory with a UKIP opposition?) SE Region Parliament going to be able to vary income tax in the same way that Scotland can? And what happens when the push taxes down (as they will)? We could have tax completion between different parts of the island of Great Britain. It's Balkanisation writ small if we are not very careful.
The trouble with a federation that splits out London is that London votes Labour. So you'd have the acute problem that the cash generator of the UK economy would potentially be subjected to envy taxes voted for by people who couldn't care less if this does a Francois Hollande to London, because as a class they themselves are always takers rather than payers of tax. If this killed the City they'd just demand that someone else they envy be taxed instead.
It's a bit too simplistic to say 'London votes Labour' - London has voted for Boris twice!
Truer to say London leans Labour. It has 28 Conservative MPs, hundreds of Conservative councillors, and the Conservatives and UKIP can expect to win c. 40% of the vote between them, next year.
But the right wing split in London is very much more pro-European than in the rest of the UK
That's certainly true. Someone like Mark Field is probably the archetypal representative of their viewpoint.
Even more reason to bring in some eurosceptic parts of the home counties...
I think the boundaries of Bromley, Hillingdon, and Croydon already stretch some distance beyond what people would really consider to be London. Hertsmere and Brroxbourne would probably be a natural fit with Barnet and Enfield respectively. Staines and Ashford would naturally fit into London.
ISam - you are seemingly obsessed and spend most of your time on here accusing posters of being other posters. Hugh is Tim etc where does it end? Who cares? It's boring.
@Watcher - I have genuinely no idea who you are talking about. I have never even read a post from Reggie, never mind masqueraded as him.
Bingley in West Yorkshire lost the HQ building for Bradford and Bingley bank in 2008 during the banking crisis, it is now a sainsbury`s many lost their jobs
So without a currency union a few HQ`s will move, especially to be risk averse against another crisis. However there will be a deal,if there is a yes vote, whatever they say, to avoid another crisis.
Err no. The financial sector is about more than banking. There is a huge pension industry in Scotland which has about 90+% of its business on the other side of the border, given pensions are such a minefield of legislation I really can't see this staying where it is so the office jobs go too.
This is what I was pointing out last night in microcosm. Our company pension funds and actuarial services are both based in Edinburgh and we will have to pull the plug and move them (unless they are moved for us as Std Life is of course saying it will) as we simply cannot have such complex legal and regulatory set ups based in a foreign country. End of. No debate. An Irish actuary with the world's greatest track record and exemplary qualifications could offer their services to us for next to nothing and we would still say no if they were based in Dublin, precisely because we need the reassurance of being in the same ongoing legal framework as the pensions will be paid in. It's not "scaremongering", it's not "bullying", it's the truth and ordinary people's future's rely on it.
Stick your £20 up your erchie you wittering dimwit
@bigjohnowls One of the Met police managed to shoot an unarmed man (innocent) six times with single action revolver, then beat him over the head with the butt of the gun. Walked into court, said he panicked, walked out of court not guilty. A single action revolver requires the hammer to be cocked and the trigger pulled in a precise fashion, the police were armed with them because of this fact.
The last few days have been disastrous for Yes. The 'Financial Flight' narrative has completely taken hold. The SNP have been blind sided. Salmond must counter the growing impression of a post-independence Scotland being a fiscal wasteland. If not the dream is in tatters.
The last few days have been disastrous for Yes. The 'Financial Flight' narrative has completely taken hold. The SNP have been blind sided. Salmond must counter the growing impression of a post-independence Scotland being a fiscal wasteland. If not the dream is in tatters.
No, no not at all...
@BBCNormanS: Criy of "biased BBC" when Alex Salmond challenged by colleague @bbcnickrobinson over RBS and John Lewis #indyref
@MirrorJames: Salmond accused Robinson of "heckling" for asking him to answer the question. Can't stand being questioned.
Kim Jong Eck will only take questions from approved sources. Heckling (asking for an answer to an unapproved question) is disrespect, and will be punished...
I really hope there isn't an EU referendum, as much as I want the Tories to win the next election. I want to see Britain leave the EU, but not on any of the models proposed by the BOO campaign; not because I fear the ceding of national sovereignty, not the imposition of the Euro nor anything to do with Human Rights. I simply think as a decision making body it is far too slow to respond to changing conditions and lacks a vision for Europe's place in the world. Increasingly it simply looks like the EU is doing things badly. So I would be greatly torn in the event of a referendum.
First one to say "don't worry, it won't happen" loses.
If we get an English Parliament with the same powers as a DevoMax Scotland we then have the very real problem of what the UK government is for other than foreign policy and defence. At that point it seems a little bit wasteful to have all those MPs sat at Westminster twiddling their thumbs until the next crisis blows up... And a UK PM would essentially be stripped of any authority on the domestic stage, being someone we wheel out occasionally for EU summits (assuming we stay in) and the odd photo op with the US President.
If Scotland really does get significant new powers in the tax and spend sphere, rather than DevoMax doesn't this really become CurrencyUnionPlus? Not sure why Salmonds really that bothered about independence now, looks like we'll gift him what he wants if everyone votes no...
Foreign policy and defence are important however. Add in immigration, justice, and overall economic policy, and there's still a very big role for Parliament. But, probably with fewer MPs,
Alternatively, we devolve more power to the Counties. Or have a rule that only English MPs may vote on issues that affect England.
I'd add the UK PM has little enough time on the domestic stage as it is. But he/she would still need to liaise with the domestic policies of the home nations and take an interest. I'd also have no problem with fewer part time UK MPs, or UK MPs spending more time on the detail of major international, global and strategic issues like these - and less about acting as puffed up social workers.
Ipsos MORI @IpsosMORI 55m From our archives: How did Britons react to #911 one week later? http://bit.ly/1lVOrYC #911anniversary
Q12 worries me. The Cold War. 3 minutes warning. And things are LESS safe ...
Short memories.
Living a couple of miles from a first strike target that would have been on the receiving end of 10 Megatons of canned sunshine isn't something that I'll forget personally.
I just had a quick flick through that Wee Blue Book. It's hilarious. Full of unsubstantiated 'facts', reverse scaremongering and wishful thinking.
Some of it doesn't even try to put a coherent counter argument. My favourite one was on borders if Scotland joins Schengen and takes out a different immigration policy: it doesn't claim that this wouldn't happen, just that it's be too much hassle to build and police a border so the English wouldn't bother.
I prefer "fanny features".
Casino that is the upmarket one , turnips are for the sheeple
Ipsos MORI @IpsosMORI 55m From our archives: How did Britons react to #911 one week later? http://bit.ly/1lVOrYC #911anniversary
Q12 worries me. The Cold War. 3 minutes warning. And things are LESS safe ...
I found a lot of public information films terrifying, as a boy. One I saw was about all the terrible things that could happen to children when they mucked about on farms. One boy stole a tractor which toppled over on him; another slowly drowned in a cess pit.
ISam - you are seemingly obsessed and spend most of your time on here accusing posters of being other posters. Hugh is Tim etc where does it end? Who cares? It's boring.
@Watcher - I have genuinely no idea who you are talking about. I have never even read a post from Reggie, never mind masqueraded as him.
Bob, Watcher is as barking as Scott, don't try to fathom his dribbling
Quite interesting reading pb.com today. Less than 36 hours ago we were all collectively hyperventilating and thinking it was all over: Scotland was lost.
Today, we're more confident, relaxed and resorting to jokes once more. As well as back to pointing out that just one poll out of dozens has YES ever so slightly ahead, so what we were ever worried about?
Just goes to show how high the stakes are, I guess.
This is about more than betting and money - this time. And it's by no means over yet.
I just had a quick flick through that Wee Blue Book. It's hilarious. Full of unsubstantiated 'facts', reverse scaremongering and wishful thinking.
Some of it doesn't even try to put a coherent counter argument. My favourite one was on borders if Scotland joins Schengen and takes out a different immigration policy: it doesn't claim that this wouldn't happen, just that it's be too much hassle to build and police a border so the English wouldn't bother.
I prefer "fanny features".
Casino that is the upmarket one , turnips are for the sheeple
@Sean_F Scariest film I saw was Project Zircon, not because of the special branch taking our photographs (watching it was covered under the official secrets act). But it was my first realization of just how bad our system of government is. Hiding stuff from the British Public when all the rest of the world had known about it for years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zircon_(satellite)
Anyone know if Andy Burnham is one of the 100 Labour MPs being shunted up north in a sealed train to start the Labour revolution? Would be fascinating to hear his views on the NHS.
Me too. Not just on privatization and TTIp, but also on doing things differently in the NHS at all - which hrather misses the point of devolution (his party's policy):
“I would feel really genuinely sad if Scotland votes for independence, not just for our own self-interest and in the extra difficulty we would face getting a Labour government in England but I also don’t want to drive up the M6 and get my passport out or have to drive on the right when I want to drive on the left.” (This is NOT an April Fool. I checked.)
I've heard a couple of 'yes' supporters mention TTIp -don't quite understand how that's an argument for you? We've just heard there will definitely be no EU referendum north of the border if Scotland goes Indy, and as a small member state, that will have to make concessions to get back in, there will quite obviously be no exemption for Scotland from this. So surely it undermines your entire argument about the Scottish NHS?
ISam - you are seemingly obsessed and spend most of your time on here accusing posters of being other posters. Hugh is Tim etc where does it end? Who cares? It's boring.
@Watcher - I have genuinely no idea who you are talking about. I have never even read a post from Reggie, never mind masqueraded as him.
No I don't, I just don't understand why you keep coming and going under different names, it's weird
@iainmartin1: If Salmond hadn't lost the plot before he has now. Unstatesmanlike wittering about leak inquiries and "BBC bias"
Eckurning point.
Accusations of BBC bias are hilarious given that the whole Yes upturn was kick started by the second, BBC Indy debate hosted by a feeble presenter who let Salmond get away with chuntering through everything Darling said and was populated by a pro Indy audience.
Quite interesting reading pb.com today. Less than 36 hours ago we were all collectively hyperventilating and thinking it was all over: Scotland was lost.
Today, we're more confident, relaxed and resorting to jokes once more. As well as back to pointing out that just one poll out of dozens has YES ever so slightly ahead, so what we were ever worried about?
Just goes to show how high the stakes are, I guess.
This is about more than betting and money - this time. And it's by no means over yet.
Seems odd to me that yes is back at 5 on Betfair now having had three polls that were brilliant, very good and average
Oscar has got very, very lucky. If I am ever up on a murder charge in South Africa -unlikely, but who can say for sure? - I want this judge.
The likely outcome is culpable homicide, which I presume is the same as manslaughter, so a jail sentence is quite likely I would have thought.
I think the key point was that the gun shot trajectory was downwards in one direction and if there was an intention to murder the person on the other side of the closed door, the shots would have been in different directions. The Judge said that the prosecution had not proved their case that it was murder.
I just had a quick flick through that Wee Blue Book. It's hilarious. Full of unsubstantiated 'facts', reverse scaremongering and wishful thinking.
Some of it doesn't even try to put a coherent counter argument. My favourite one was on borders if Scotland joins Schengen and takes out a different immigration policy: it doesn't claim that this wouldn't happen, just that it's be too much hassle to build and police a border so the English wouldn't bother.
I prefer "fanny features".
Casino that is the upmarket one , turnips are for the sheeple
Nooooo!! Please don't deny me my fanny!
Careful. The kind malcolm goes near are full of piss and wind.
So, as far as I can tell Survation has 16-24 year olds the opposite of all the other polling companies - so going very heavily No, whilst others have the group split or going heavily Yes. They also have Glasgow as going heavily No which I think isn't in keeping with the other companies either.
That seems to be the difference between their result and everyone else as best as I can tell from 1 table.
Generally speaking, one shouldn't worry to much about sub-samples. All this week's polls are consistent with No having a small lead.
They may have all got the same answer but the working out is fascinating
As the C4 tweet shows TNS and YouGov has 16-24's massively in favour of Yes, Survation has them massively against twitter.com/Channel4News/status/509682483831402496
Hague not ruling out delaying GE. Now we really are talking possible constitutional crisis.
Could be interesting.. I believe the consent of the House of Lords is needed (the Parliament Act does not apply).
I would have thought that they would get consent from HoL, but who knows. Chaos that's for sure. What's really interesting is I don't think Salmond's target date of March 2016 is realistic, so how long are they going to delay GE for? One year, two years?
@iainmartin1: If Salmond hadn't lost the plot before he has now. Unstatesmanlike wittering about leak inquiries and "BBC bias"
Eckurning point.
Accusations of BBC bias are hilarious given that the whole Yes upturn was kick started by the second, BBC Indy debate hosted by a feeble presenter who let Salmond get away with chuntering through everything Darling said and was populated by a pro Indy audience.
... And the fact that the BBC (and the other media, admittedly) went into overdrive mode after the YouGov poll, pretty much with the insinuation breakup looked imminent.
Comments
Saturation coverage on news channels, most people won't see enough to get any real sense of proceedings, and the major news broadcasts (at 10, say) will put it together into a small summary of video which may or may not give a fair reflection of how things have gone.
I suppose she was only white trash to you
How many years does A get?
I love Maths puzzles
Eck now bleating that the RBS news he said was "scaremongering" and "not going to happen" was "market sensitive information"
Toys ⊄ Pram
What's his point by that? That companies shouldn't make announcements that move share prices? Bizarre.
Do you imagine that by insulting people you will bring them around to your viewpoint? Or do you just get a kick out of being rude?
I may blether on about shoes and such, but at least I do not suffer from social Tourettes.
Thats why only fired four shots!!!
Positive engagement rather than public schoolboy politics is the way to boost European Union relations, he adds."
Climb every mountain, ford every stream, follow every byway, til you find your...continued on page 94.
With the excitement and panic over IndyRef polls in the last few days it's foolish to speculate even on a 24 hour period when things are as febrile as they are now. I'd be interested on the gains and losses in betting by PBers these last 5 days.
Ipsos MORI @IpsosMORI 55m
From our archives: How did Britons react to #911 one week later? http://bit.ly/1lVOrYC #911anniversary
Expand
My favourite remains Gordon and the shock loss of Glasgow East
It used unfamiliar footage very amusingly. https://youtube.com/watch?v=iMi776jah1w
No.
The company made a statement. Yesterday.
Is he having a breakdown live on stage?
@Watcher - I have genuinely no idea who you are talking about. I have never even read a post from Reggie, never mind masqueraded as him.
@BBCNormanS: Alex Salmond mocks BBCs "impartial role" in referendum campaign #indyref
Whichever colour or creed Reena was you should be ashamed to make fun of her death and be so crude about her
Reminds me of OJ Simpson trial.
One of the Met police managed to shoot an unarmed man (innocent) six times with single action revolver, then beat him over the head with the butt of the gun.
Walked into court, said he panicked, walked out of court not guilty.
A single action revolver requires the hammer to be cocked and the trigger pulled in a precise fashion, the police were armed with them because of this fact.
@BBCNormanS: Criy of "biased BBC" when Alex Salmond challenged by colleague @bbcnickrobinson over RBS and John Lewis #indyref
Surely everyone would have a far better lunch if the verdict was known - I can't imagine Reeva Steenkamp's family is going to eat well at all.
Keep going!
Kim Jong Eck will only take questions from approved sources. Heckling (asking for an answer to an unapproved question) is disrespect, and will be punished...
I really hope there isn't an EU referendum, as much as I want the Tories to win the next election. I want to see Britain leave the EU, but not on any of the models proposed by the BOO campaign; not because I fear the ceding of national sovereignty, not the imposition of the Euro nor anything to do with Human Rights. I simply think as a decision making body it is far too slow to respond to changing conditions and lacks a vision for Europe's place in the world. Increasingly it simply looks like the EU is doing things badly. So I would be greatly torn in the event of a referendum.
First one to say "don't worry, it won't happen" loses.
Human feelings are not a concern when lawyers and judges egos are at stake.
Living a couple of miles from a first strike target that would have been on the receiving end of 10 Megatons of canned sunshine isn't something that I'll forget personally.
Eck has cleverly solved the problem of Scottish banks printing pound notes. There will be no Scottish banks...
"Get the facts" = get the opinions and the answers you want to hear
Did you watch "When the Wind Blows"? So scary the government tried to suppress it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_the_Wind_Blows_(1986_film)
Today, we're more confident, relaxed and resorting to jokes once more. As well as back to pointing out that just one poll out of dozens has YES ever so slightly ahead, so what we were ever worried about?
Just goes to show how high the stakes are, I guess.
This is about more than betting and money - this time. And it's by no means over yet.
Scariest film I saw was Project Zircon, not because of the special branch taking our photographs (watching it was covered under the official secrets act).
But it was my first realization of just how bad our system of government is.
Hiding stuff from the British Public when all the rest of the world had known about it for years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zircon_(satellite)
The Day After is pretty powerful too.
http://constitution-unit.com/2014/02/19/scottish-independence-and-the-uk-general-election/
Accusations of BBC bias are hilarious given that the whole Yes upturn was kick started by the second, BBC Indy debate hosted by a feeble presenter who let Salmond get away with chuntering through everything Darling said and was populated by a pro Indy audience.
http://www.kyivpost.com/multimedia/video-2/ukraine-today-putin-sacks-governor-for-rally-against-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-video-364125.html
It's almost like the whole "we're only supporting democracy" thing is a complete load of bullshit.
I think the key point was that the gun shot trajectory was downwards in one direction and if there was an intention to murder the person on the other side of the closed door, the shots would have been in different directions. The Judge said that the prosecution had not proved their case that it was murder.
As the C4 tweet shows TNS and YouGov has 16-24's massively in favour of Yes, Survation has them massively against
twitter.com/Channel4News/status/509682483831402496
At least one of the pollsters is massively wrong
(via @sanglesey) http://t.co/uB1Blc3II3