Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Thanet South: The first seat where UKIP is the betting favo

124

Comments

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    GIN1138 said:

    I wonder whether Mr and Mrs Jack W will be having a Coulson In The Slammer Candlelight Supper this evening?

    Why so ?

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688

    Gadfly said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    Someone wrote "no one died".

    4 and a half months for hacking into hundreds of emails including those of kidnapped/feared dead people.

    8 months for passing speeding points.

    No one died !

    You're getting confused.

    Andy Coulson received 18months, Chris Huhne received 8 months.
    I was referring to this.
    Pulpstar said:

    4 and a half months sounds about right for Coulson to my mind.

    Noone's died.



    As far as total time served (which versus 8 weeks for an MP perverting the course of justice on a road safety issue) it seems reasonable.

    PS I had someone break into my home while I was sleeping (broke kitchen window to get in waking me up), I chased them out of the house and got their reg plate as they drove out. Burglar was arrested following week red handed in someone else's home and confessed to break and entering into 20 homes. Was sentence to community service and a 12 month suspended sentence - not a day to be served. Now I know which I think is more serious of the three offenses - and which is more likely to be repeated and it isn't phone hacking.
    8 weeks ? No, it was 8 months for both Mr and ex Mrs.
    No the SENTENCE was 8 months, just as the SENTENCE for Coulson is 18 months.

    The TIME SERVED was 8 weeks I believe just like the TIME SERVED has been estimated as probably going to be ~4.5 months for Coulson.

    You are comparing apples to oranges. Does that make it clear or does the difference between a SENTENCE and TIME SERVED need to be explained to you?

    To be fair, it is something of a minefield. Essentially, offenders sentenced between 12 weeks and 4 years for non-violent, non-drug and non-sexual offences, will serve around one quarter of their sentence behind bars. All other offenders will serve half of their sentence. Google Home Detention Curfew for the nitty gritty.
    I do wish the legal system could actually sort this out and announce the sentences people actually serve. God knows why we have this ridiculous system where the official sentence does not reflect err the sentence. Would save a whole load of confusion and jumping to wrong conclusions etc

    Its ridiculous that even on a well informed site like this nobody is sure what Andy Coulson will actually serve
    I've already said he'll serve 4.5 months, I said Huhne would serve 2 months when he was sentenced.

    HDC (or tagging) isn't guaranteed, but so long as Andy C is a good boy prison, he meets the criteria for it.

  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    edited July 2014

    Gadfly said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    Someone wrote "no one died".

    4 and a half months for hacking into hundreds of emails including those of kidnapped/feared dead people.

    8 months for passing speeding points.

    No one died !

    You're getting confused.

    Andy Coulson received 18months, Chris Huhne received 8 months.
    I was referring to this.
    Pulpstar said:

    4 and a half months sounds about right for Coulson to my mind.

    Noone's died.



    As far as total time served (which versus 8 weeks for an MP perverting the course of justice on a road safety issue) it seems reasonable.

    PS I had someone break into my home while I was sleeping (broke kitchen window to get in waking me up), I chased them out of the house and got their reg plate as they drove out. Burglar was arrested following week red handed in someone else's home and confessed to break and entering into 20 homes. Was sentence to community service and a 12 month suspended sentence - not a day to be served. Now I know which I think is more serious of the three offenses - and which is more likely to be repeated and it isn't phone hacking.
    8 weeks ? No, it was 8 months for both Mr and ex Mrs.
    No the SENTENCE was 8 months, just as the SENTENCE for Coulson is 18 months.

    The TIME SERVED was 8 weeks I believe just like the TIME SERVED has been estimated as probably going to be ~4.5 months for Coulson.

    You are comparing apples to oranges. Does that make it clear or does the difference between a SENTENCE and TIME SERVED need to be explained to you?

    To be fair, it is something of a minefield. Essentially, offenders sentenced between 12 weeks and 4 years for non-violent, non-drug and non-sexual offences, will serve around one quarter of their sentence behind bars. All other offenders will serve half of their sentence. Google Home Detention Curfew for the nitty gritty.
    I do wish the legal system could actually sort this out and announce the sentences people actually serve. God knows why we have this ridiculous system where the official sentence does not reflect err the sentence. Would save a whole load of confusion and jumping to wrong conclusions etc

    Its ridiculous that even on a well informed site like this nobody is sure what Andy Coulson will actually serve
    Do you object to reports that the PM's pay is £142,500? Because working out what he takes home is a damn sight more difficult than translating prison sentences from gross to net.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,026
    And as I said I think 4.5 months is OK - Sentence should be announced as follows:

    18 month sentence, of which at least 4.5 months will be spent in prison.
  • Options
    FalseFlagFalseFlag Posts: 1,801

    TGOHF said:

    On a cheerier note ;)

    Socialist France is rooked

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10944874/IMF-warns-of-negative-spiral-in-France-as-recession-looms-again.html

    "The IMF said public debt should peak at 95pc of GDP next year but a “growth shock” would push it to 103pc by 2016. The Fund warned of a “negative spiral of low growth and falling inflation” that is pushing up real borrowing costs and further choking investment, already dismally weak. Core inflation was 0.3pc in May.

    The economic relapse is a political disaster for Mr Hollande, already the least popular leader in modern times with a poll rating of 23pc, and reeling from a crushing defeat by the far-Right Front National in European elections"

    "...Britain still has one of the largest deficits in the world. Our deficit as a percentage of GDP is still about 6 per cent. France's is half that size and Germany's has almost been eliminated. "

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4137047.ece
    Yes, who ever wins the next election will really have to implement some real cuts. Alarming how persistent our deficit is in the face of very strong growth and that debt to GDP ratio keeps creeping up.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    I love it when Labour MPs make predictions.

    Sadiq Khan says expect a leadership election next year (for Lib Dems and Tories)

    http://labourlist.org/2014/07/sadiq-khan-says-expect-a-leadership-election-next-year-for-lib-dems-and-tories/

    Just wish he had said, soon there will be an election and labour will increase its majority.

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/conference/2007/09/labour-majority-increase

    Oh dear me.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Good piece by the Professor in the School of Government and Public Policy at the University of Strathclyde.

    Tracking the Polls: Steady Increase in Support for Yes over last nine months, according to New Method

    http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/07/tracking-the-polls-steady-increase-in-support-for-yes-over-last-nine-months-according-to-new-method/
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Socrates said:

    The ONS today released some numbers today on inter-ethnic relationships, that makes for very interesting reading. I did a quick ratio of the share of each ethnic group dating someone from outside their group, relative to the share of the population that's outside their group. So in a colour blind society, these numbers should all be 1, and in a completely segregated society these numbers would all be 0:

    White Irish: 0.70
    Gypsy/Irish traveller: 0.50
    Black Caribbean: 0.43
    Arab 0.34
    Chinese 0.30
    White British: 0.22
    Black African: 0.22
    Indian: 0.12
    Pakistani: 0.08
    Bangladeshi: 0.07

    I found particularly interesting that Irish travellers and gypsies, who I have always thought were very segregated are actually one of the most open groups with their relationships. As expected, the Irish and Afro-Caribbeans are very integrated. The indigenous White British don't mix very well, while the numbers for south Asians are very poor. It seems we have a long way to go to improve integration.

    The figures are interesting, but opportunity for trans-community dating needs to exist first. As most ethnic minorities are urban populations, but a goodly percentage of white British live in rural areas or places like the West Country or East Anglia, there must be areas where trans cultural dating are impossible. In other words in Leicester it is easy, but in Devon or Norfolk much less easy to date a different ethnic group.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 42,196
    Smarmeron said:

    @malcolmg
    Conformational bias, is when we give greater credence to "facts" that support what we already believe, and dismiss as irrelevant those which go against us.
    Everyone does it, and in all walks of life, the trick is to realise you are falling prey to it and look again.

    (Not on here of course, it would be no fun if we did)

    I know , I was having a laugh( or thought I was ).LOL
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    The judge might simply want to extend a rather fine lunch ....

    I don't blame him, being in the same court room as the pervert Aussie fiddles with his didgeridoo isn't a prospect to be savoured.

  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    JackW said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    The judge might simply want to extend a rather fine lunch ....

    I don't blame him, being in the same court room as the pervert Aussie fiddles with his didgeridoo isn't a prospect to be savoured.

    Naah, that's his extra leg.

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,026

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    I can't believe that the sentence will be non-custodial. It would look ill with the public.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    Or the judge has an old pal unexpectedly turned up for lunch, or there is a sporting fixture going on that the judge wants to watch or a hundred and one other possible reasons totally unconnected with the case.

    Years ago my wife was due to give evidence at a trial at Lewes Crown Court, but arrived home very, very early. The court had come back from lunch an finished evidence of the witness who had been in the box before hand. Then at 14:30 the judge said that the court would adjourn until the following day - according to counsel the test match had reached a critical point and the judge didn't want to miss the action (the old boy is, I think, still alive so I won't name him).
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    It would be, but there are reasons that the judge could give a non custodial sentence.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,251
    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    The judge has already said to expect a custodial sentence so I don't think that will be happening. Will he get concurrent or consecutive (a la Clifford) sentences?

  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    @TheScreamingEagles - On reflection it might be better to delete your post and the replies.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    Or the judge has an old pal unexpectedly turned up for lunch, or there is a sporting fixture going on that the judge wants to watch or a hundred and one other possible reasons totally unconnected with the case.

    Years ago my wife was due to give evidence at a trial at Lewes Crown Court, but arrived home very, very early. The court had come back from lunch an finished evidence of the witness who had been in the box before hand. Then at 14:30 the judge said that the court would adjourn until the following day - according to counsel the test match had reached a critical point and the judge didn't want to miss the action (the old boy is, I think, still alive so I won't name him).
    Justice needs to be done and seen to be done, nobody ever said anything about it being swift ;)
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427
    edited July 2014
    ToryJim said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    I can't believe that the sentence will be non-custodial. It would look ill with the public.
    Surely a judge takes into account the facts of the case and not what looks good with the public (or what the media think is the public's thoughts)? One hopes anyway
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    It would be, but there are reasons that the judge could give a non custodial sentence.
    I think he'd have to spend a lot of time explaining them but they'd still get lost in the tabloid hysteria.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688

    @TheScreamingEagles - On reflection it might be better to delete your post and the replies.

    Yup - The Russell Brand - Spectator story is off limits.
  • Options
    FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012

    For our American posters and cousins.

    "Happy the day the British Empire decided India was more important than America day"

    Its the day Vickburg surrendered and Grant effectively won the American Civil War.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    ToryJim said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    I can't believe that the sentence will be non-custodial. It would look ill with the public.
    Surely a judge takes into account the facts of the case and not what looks good with the public (or what the media think is the public's thoughts)? One hopes anyway
    Oh of course but reality is that most people seem to think that everyone should go away for life for everything if not be hanged if the option were available.
  • Options
    CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 40,064
    That newspaper piece is naughty - it was in fact Labour/Trot students who chased Mr F into the pub ... but that makes it all the more interesting Mr F has picked Glasgow.

    IIRC the OO Walk is in Edinburgh the Saturday before the referendum, so no clash in that geographical sense.

  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    ToryJim said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    It would be, but there are reasons that the judge could give a non custodial sentence.
    I think he'd have to spend a lot of time explaining them but they'd still get lost in the tabloid hysteria.
    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/may/02/max-clifford-sentenced-eight-years-jail-indecently-assaulting-four-girls
    Probably the best guide to what is likely to happen, though several major adjustments need to be made.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Looks like Rolf is getting carpeted by the judge from what I'm seeing on Twitter.
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    Sentencing is currently underway
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    Gadfly said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    Sentencing is currently underway
    @peterwalker99
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427
    ToryJim said:

    ToryJim said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ToryJim said:

    Rolf Harris sentencing moved to 1.45pm

    He's either getting off, or the judge is looking at something severe.

    He can't "get off" he's been convicted.
    Getting off from a custodial sentence.
    That would be a complete disgrace.
    I can't believe that the sentence will be non-custodial. It would look ill with the public.
    Surely a judge takes into account the facts of the case and not what looks good with the public (or what the media think is the public's thoughts)? One hopes anyway
    Oh of course but reality is that most people seem to think that everyone should go away for life for everything if not be hanged if the option were available.
    Not sure its just those with the most animated opinions tend to get heard. Most people are content to leave it to the judge
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Yeah Rolf is going away for a very long time, judging by the Judge's remarks.
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191

    Yeah Rolf is going away for a very long time, judging by the Judge's remarks.

    Can you tell what it is yet?
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    O/T I couldn't help being amused by this, from the Beeb business page:

    BT pension deal cuts longevity risk

    The UK's biggest corporate final-salary pension scheme has struck a deal to protect itself against members living for longer than expected.

  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427
    Thanet South looks a three way tie (especially if Farage stands) - back the outsider ,Labour?
  • Options
    steve_garnersteve_garner Posts: 1,019
    Sadiq Khan might be more usefully deployed trying to explain Labour's policies rather than making pointless predictions and handing out hostages to fortune. Is it that Labour are increasingly desperate and he's trying to shore up morale?

    I'm beginning to wonder if Cameron really is a lucky politician. Just over 4 years ago Labour went into the GE knowing that they had an unelectable candidate for PM having been unwilling to depose him in the previous year. Are they repeating the whole process?
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,667
    Just watched the BBC piece on the aircraft carrier. It all seems a bit premature, we don't have any planes for it until 2019 at the earliest which means it is useless until then unless the French want to borrow it as a platform for their air power in NATO operations.
  • Options
    FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012

    TGOHF said:

    On a cheerier note ;)

    Socialist France is rooked

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10944874/IMF-warns-of-negative-spiral-in-France-as-recession-looms-again.html

    "The IMF said public debt should peak at 95pc of GDP next year but a “growth shock” would push it to 103pc by 2016. The Fund warned of a “negative spiral of low growth and falling inflation” that is pushing up real borrowing costs and further choking investment, already dismally weak. Core inflation was 0.3pc in May.

    The economic relapse is a political disaster for Mr Hollande, already the least popular leader in modern times with a poll rating of 23pc, and reeling from a crushing defeat by the far-Right Front National in European elections"

    "...Britain still has one of the largest deficits in the world. Our deficit as a percentage of GDP is still about 6 per cent. France's is half that size and Germany's has almost been eliminated. "

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4137047.ece
    The French deficit is heading up - towards 4%. its growth forcast has been cut.
    http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/business/2014/07/04/imf-cuts-french-growth-forecast-warns-on-deficit/
    It hs missed its targets
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/31/us-france-budget-idUSBREA2U07D20140331

    French debt is in the region of 95 percent of its gross domestic product. A little higher than ours.
    The French NHS is funded from compulsory insurance as well as from the govt. I wonder if the French NHS deficit is included in the figures. I think the french NHS is running a deficit of 8 billion euros.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,942
    JackW said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I wonder whether Mr and Mrs Jack W will be having a Coulson In The Slammer Candlelight Supper this evening?

    Why so ?

    No reason.x
  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,279
    Daily Telegraph - Alex Salmond reportedly booed during naming of HMS Queen Elizabeth

    Scott_P said:

    @GeorgeWParker: Gentle booing by some dockyard workers and families as Alex Salmond appears on big screen at Rosyth at aircraft carrier launch..

    Just to get the full sound picture..

    Severin Carrell ‏@severincarrell 2 mins
    Some mild booing of @AlexSalmond and @David_Cameron by #Rosyth dockyard workers at HMS Queen Elizabeth naming ceremony #QECarriers
    Scots boo Tory?

    Whatevers next? Scousers boo Mancs?
    Scots boo their prime minister in one of his VERY few public appearances? Whatever next, a pm starts to defend the Union with every fibre of his being? No, I didn't think so.

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,026

    O/T I couldn't help being amused by this, from the Beeb business page:

    BT pension deal cuts longevity risk

    The UK's biggest corporate final-salary pension scheme has struck a deal to protect itself against members living for longer than expected.

    Wouldn't a large emplyer such as BT be at less risk than a smaller employer of employees "living too long", as the mean extension in lifespan can be extrapolated and there should be less variance with more people ?
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Harris is definitely going to gaol.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,026

    Thanet South looks a three way tie (especially if Farage stands) - back the outsider ,Labour?

    Not at 2-1.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Rolf Harris gets 5 years 9 months.

    So he could be out in less than 3 years.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Rolf goes down for 5 years and 9 months.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    By my reckoning, he'll be out in May 2017.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,026
    2 years 10 months, 2 weeks in gaol ?
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    But not as funny as Coogan as the IRA leader on The Day Today who was forced to inhale helium to subtract credibility from his statement
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427
    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Isn't there 4 victims?
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    The ONS today released some numbers today on inter-ethnic relationships, that makes for very interesting reading. I did a quick ratio of the share of each ethnic group dating someone from outside their group, relative to the share of the population that's outside their group. So in a colour blind society, these numbers should all be 1, and in a completely segregated society these numbers would all be 0:

    White Irish: 0.70
    Gypsy/Irish traveller: 0.50
    Black Caribbean: 0.43
    Arab 0.34
    Chinese 0.30
    White British: 0.22
    Black African: 0.22
    Indian: 0.12
    Pakistani: 0.08
    Bangladeshi: 0.07

    I found particularly interesting that Irish travellers and gypsies, who I have always thought were very segregated are actually one of the most open groups with their relationships. As expected, the Irish and Afro-Caribbeans are very integrated. The indigenous White British don't mix very well, while the numbers for south Asians are very poor. It seems we have a long way to go to improve integration.

    The figures are interesting, but opportunity for trans-community dating needs to exist first. As most ethnic minorities are urban populations, but a goodly percentage of white British live in rural areas or places like the West Country or East Anglia, there must be areas where trans cultural dating are impossible. In other words in Leicester it is easy, but in Devon or Norfolk much less easy to date a different ethnic group.
    That's an interesting point, but I would have thought Devon or Norfolk populations are fairly small as a percentage of the white population. It also doesn't apply at all to the three groups at the bottom of that list.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786

    By my reckoning, he'll be out in May 2017.

    I would imagine his health will go downhill as swiftly as Stuart Halls, he's an old man now, might not make it out at all.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    MaxPB said:

    Just watched the BBC piece on the aircraft carrier. It all seems a bit premature, we don't have any planes for it until 2019 at the earliest which means it is useless until then unless the French want to borrow it as a platform for their air power in NATO operations.

    The Frog jets cannot use the QE - no catapults to launch them and no arrester wires to enable them to land. Design decisions made to save money meant that the original idea that "Cats and Traps" could be retrofitted went out of the window without anyone really noticing. The engineering and building of the QE has been a tremendous success. The project management and the political interference during the design stage was a total disgrace. Down, of course, to the treasury under the leadership of the malignant maniac Brown.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    17.25 months per victim, effectively half that in terms of actual prison time.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    ToryJim said:

    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?

    Nope, he's got family and established here.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,380
    edited July 2014
    fitalass said:
    Ah, the Tele, the surgers' house paper.

    PB Scottish Tories selectively highlight booing of Salmond.
    I point out that both Salmond and Cameron were booed.

    Of course the Cameron icon polishers will still be too cowardly to want their prime minister to be tested in front of ordinary Scottish voters.
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427
    edited July 2014
    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    Oh I don't know . The judge would only be mistaken if he ignored the facts of the case and sentenced on what he would think would give him the best media outcome. Surely the cornerstone of justice is to sentence on the facts and not on what the media will say
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    Because I get accused of cheating, I've scheduled the new thread to go up after 2pm.

    So you can prep yourselves to be first, as I'm disappearing for the rest of the afternoon.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
    I think it serves its uses, I think there are arguments either way. I think the teenage kid who gets caught having shoplifted on 30 occasions might feel extremely hard done by if he ends up doing a year for each consecutively.
  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664

    By my reckoning, he'll be out in May 2017.

    I would imagine his health will go downhill as swiftly as Stuart Halls, he's an old man now, might not make it out at all.
    Life expectancy 3 years assuming good health and one "major life event".

    Mind you the "calculator" is ridiculous, it says that JackW can expect to have died 22 years ago.

    http://www.uwic.ac.uk/shss/dom/newweb/lifestyle/age_expectancy2.htm
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited July 2014
    The twittersphere will not be happy with Rolf Harris’ prison sentence – earlier this morning they were calling for blood and appeared not to be unhappy unless he was hung, drawn and quartered.

    No specifics, but there are a frighteningly large amount of really twisted people on twitter. : (
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    Oh I don't know . The judge would only be mistaken if he ignored the facts of the case and sentenced on what he would think would give him the best media outcome. Surely the cornerstone of justice is to sentence on the facts and not on what the media will say
    Because people with a strong opinion tend to air their views on it and people who don't have a strong opinion or think the sentence is ok don't tend to shout about it it means that what the media think the 'public' are really caring about is distorted. Can be very dangerous

  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    That would be totally unacceptable. It would allow a government to change the law and have minor offenders (and I'm not talking about any of the current cases involving celebrities or that part of law) locked up for life for political expediency.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    ToryJim said:

    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?

    Nope, he's got family and established here.
    Incorrect.

    Harris remains an Australian citizen and will be subject to deportation on completion of sentence. Mitigating circumstance may however prevail.

    The Oz authorities may also wish to extradite Harris for alleged offences down under .... so to speak.

  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    No legitimate government is going to retroactively upgrade sentencing.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
    I think it serves its uses, I think there are arguments either way. I think the teenage kid who gets caught having shoplifted on 30 occasions might feel extremely hard done by if he ends up doing a year for each consecutively.
    The American justice system has shown that consecutive sentencing has made no impact on reducing re-offending or acting as a deterrence.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    JackW said:

    ToryJim said:

    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?

    Nope, he's got family and established here.
    Incorrect.

    Harris remains an Australian citizen and will be subject to deportation on completion of sentence. Mitigating circumstance may however prevail.

    The Oz authorities may also wish to extradite Harris for alleged offences down under .... so to speak.

    I know, but he's unlikely to be deported because of the reasons I listed/the mitigation you mentioned.

  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    ToryJim said:

    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    No legitimate government is going to retroactively upgrade sentencing.
    Precisely.
    Case in point - poll tax riots
    Change the law to make maximum term for offences as part of the riots life
    Imprison all those dissatisfied with the government for life.
    Banana republic
  • Options
    state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,427

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
    I think it serves its uses, I think there are arguments either way. I think the teenage kid who gets caught having shoplifted on 30 occasions might feel extremely hard done by if he ends up doing a year for each consecutively.
    The American justice system has shown that consecutive sentencing has made no impact on reducing re-offending or acting as a deterrence.
    Consecutive sentencing can be a good option if used sparingly. For most multiple offences I think concurrent sentencing is the best option. If you try somebody for one offence and sentence you then give them a chance to think about what they have done and the consequences and give them a chance to not do it again. Obviously getting caught after multiple offences mean you do not get this opportunity and hence better to use concurrent rather than consecutive
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    James Clappison, the Conservative MP for Hertsmere is to stand down at the next election after 23 years. Allegedly this is not an entirely voluntary move. Dirty work at the cross roads? Is the Cameron Clique lining up someone for this safe seat?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    ToryJim said:

    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?

    Nope, he's got family and established here.
    Incorrect.

    Harris remains an Australian citizen and will be subject to deportation on completion of sentence. Mitigating circumstance may however prevail.

    The Oz authorities may also wish to extradite Harris for alleged offences down under .... so to speak.

    I know, but he's unlikely to be deported because of the reasons I listed/the mitigation you mentioned.

    That doesn't mean its automatic and neither should it be.

  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    That would be totally unacceptable. It would allow a government to change the law and have minor offenders (and I'm not talking about any of the current cases involving celebrities or that part of law) locked up for life for political expediency.
    The government has faced growing pressure for sentencing reform by the press for quite some time now, this will only magnify it.
    One of the cornerstones of social conservatism is complains of lax sentences for criminals (tough on crime), with an election in a few months that might turn into an issue especially with UKIP lurking around.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Rolf played my Graduation Ball and did an extra set when Dannii Minogue effed off after only doing two songs.
    I'm slightly disillusioned about the end of my three year binge now,
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 36,013

    5 years, 9 months, doesn't strike me as being unduly lenient, for these offences.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 42,196
    Smarmeron said:

    @malcolmg
    Conformational bias, is when we give greater credence to "facts" that support what we already believe, and dismiss as irrelevant those which go against us.
    Everyone does it, and in all walks of life, the trick is to realise you are falling prey to it and look again.

    (Not on here of course, it would be no fun if we did)

    I know , I was having a laugh( or thought I was ).LOL

    fitalass said:
    Ah, the Tele, the surgers' house paper.

    PB Scottish Tories selectively highlight booing of Salmond.
    I point out that both Salmond and Cameron were booed.

    Of course the Cameron icon polishers will still be too cowardly to want their prime minister to be tested in front of ordinary Scottish voters.
    TUD,
    They cannot help themselves, between Fitalass and Scottp, what a pair of lapdogs.
    I had replied to your earlier post re the high regard I hold Scottp in but it must have been too glowing much for the Moderator.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    edited July 2014
    This is all Watergate revisited anyway, it's the cover up that's going to kill them
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
    I think it serves its uses, I think there are arguments either way. I think the teenage kid who gets caught having shoplifted on 30 occasions might feel extremely hard done by if he ends up doing a year for each consecutively.
    The American justice system has shown that consecutive sentencing has made no impact on reducing re-offending or acting as a deterrence.
    But that is blanket, I think our approach of picking and choosing can be good. It means that you have a far more responsive justice system. Also I think the US justice system is plagued by more than simply their approach to multiple sentencing, it appears to me that their apparent failure to include rehabilitation is a massive problem.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    But what about the ticket inspector uniforms ?



    @BBCNormanS: The @rmtunion accuse Labour of "total cop out" over reports will not take back rail franchises into public ownership
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,688
    ToryJim said:

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    JackW said:

    Harris get total of 5 years 9 months.

    How many months per victim is that?
    Difficult to say directly as some sentences were concurrent and others consecutive.

    I don't see why we can't get rid of concurrent sentencing. "Two crimes for the price of one" shouldn't be part of our justice system.
    I think it serves its uses, I think there are arguments either way. I think the teenage kid who gets caught having shoplifted on 30 occasions might feel extremely hard done by if he ends up doing a year for each consecutively.
    The American justice system has shown that consecutive sentencing has made no impact on reducing re-offending or acting as a deterrence.
    But that is blanket, I think our approach of picking and choosing can be good. It means that you have a far more responsive justice system. Also I think the US justice system is plagued by more than simply their approach to multiple sentencing, it appears to me that their apparent failure to include rehabilitation is a massive problem.
    It is.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Consecutive sentencing is problematic in that for larger and more serious crimes in multiple it can lead to an effective sentence of life without the possibility of parole which may be In excess of the maximum sentence for the crimes committed.
    10 armed robberies each attracting a ten year sentence, to run consecutively against a 60 year old, for example
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486

    JackW said:

    ToryJim said:

    Is Rolf subject to being deported on completion of his sentence?

    Nope, he's got family and established here.
    Incorrect.

    Harris remains an Australian citizen and will be subject to deportation on completion of sentence. Mitigating circumstance may however prevail.

    The Oz authorities may also wish to extradite Harris for alleged offences down under .... so to speak.

    I know, but he's unlikely to be deported because of the reasons I listed/the mitigation you mentioned.

    I suspect that you are correct that he won't be sent packing but it would be nice to see just one person subject to penal transportation down under once more ;)
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Ishmael_X said:

    By my reckoning, he'll be out in May 2017.

    I would imagine his health will go downhill as swiftly as Stuart Halls, he's an old man now, might not make it out at all.
    Life expectancy 3 years assuming good health and one "major life event".

    Mind you the "calculator" is ridiculous, it says that JackW can expect to have died 22 years ago.

    http://www.uwic.ac.uk/shss/dom/newweb/lifestyle/age_expectancy2.htm
    I fear I've died many times over those two decades and more but always whist watching the Scottish rugby team performing ....

    But fear not .... I shall live again as we triumph at the World Cup next year ....

    Just in case I'll be leaving the mausoleum doors open ....

  • Options
    JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,215
    edited July 2014

    James Clappison, the Conservative MP for Hertsmere is to stand down at the next election after 23 years. Allegedly this is not an entirely voluntary move. Dirty work at the cross roads? Is the Cameron Clique lining up someone for this safe seat?

    Source? Doubt Central Office (as was) would have had any involvement: long gone are the days when Constituency Associations would have deferred to the centre on putting pressure to ease out sitting MPs. So unless he has fallen out badly locally (which is unlikely) I imagine his retirement is voluntary as he announced a few days back.

    But maybe we will witness the Baron Clappers of Herstmere in the 2015 Dissolution Honours?

    PS Our own Sean Fear is a past Chairman of the Hertsmere Association if I recall.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,486
    Speedy said:

    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    That would be totally unacceptable. It would allow a government to change the law and have minor offenders (and I'm not talking about any of the current cases involving celebrities or that part of law) locked up for life for political expediency.
    The government has faced growing pressure for sentencing reform by the press for quite some time now, this will only magnify it.
    One of the cornerstones of social conservatism is complains of lax sentences for criminals (tough on crime), with an election in a few months that might turn into an issue especially with UKIP lurking around.
    Sentencing reform going forward is one thing, arbitrary uprating of historic sentencing options is tyrannical and would delegitimise any government that attempted it.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    JohnO said:

    James Clappison, the Conservative MP for Hertsmere is to stand down at the next election after 23 years. Allegedly this is not an entirely voluntary move. Dirty work at the cross roads? Is the Cameron Clique lining up someone for this safe seat?

    Source? Doubt Central Office (as was) would have had any involvement: long gone are the days when Constituency Associations would have deferred to the centre on putting pressure to ease out sitting MPs. So unless he has fallen out badly locally (which is unlikely) I imagine his retirement is voluntary as he announced a few days back.

    But maybe we will witness the Baron Clappers of Herstmere in the 2015 Dissolution Honours?

    PS Our own Sean Fear is a past Chairman of the Hertsmere Association if I recall.
    Sorry I forgot the link,it s from the Speccie:

    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/07/james-clappison-didnt-stand-down-his-association-pushed-him/
  • Options
    volcanopetevolcanopete Posts: 2,078
    I had a quick look at the local election results which seemed very mixed.Nothing really much for any of the parties to shout about but some evidence that the L/D vote in patches is actually going up which confounds the polls.
    Any gardeners will know what bindweed is.Trying to get of its' roots will drive you crazy.My grandfather,who was one, said that stuff would grow in hell.The L/Ds remind me of bindweed.You just cannot get rid of it.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,380
    malcolmg said:


    TUD,
    They cannot help themselves, between Fitalass and Scottp, what a pair of lapdogs.
    I had replied to your earlier post re the high regard I hold Scottp in but it must have been too glowing much for the Moderator.


    Wow, it must have been fruity!
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Speedy said:

    Speedy said:

    JackW said:

    Speedy said:

    Harris will be out in less than 3 years, the public and the media will foam with anger, the judge might have been mistaken for handing such a light sentence in such a high profile case.

    The judge has to sentence under the guidelines applicable to when these old offences took place rather than the sterner guidelines of today.

    It gives an idea of how a Jimmy Saville trial might have gone.
    The media outcry might pressure the government to change the law on this.
    That would be totally unacceptable. It would allow a government to change the law and have minor offenders (and I'm not talking about any of the current cases involving celebrities or that part of law) locked up for life for political expediency.
    The government has faced growing pressure for sentencing reform by the press for quite some time now, this will only magnify it.
    One of the cornerstones of social conservatism is complains of lax sentences for criminals (tough on crime), with an election in a few months that might turn into an issue especially with UKIP lurking around.
    If the electorate want to live in a banana republic, then so be it. As long as they don't come crying to me when they get life sentences for failure to pay their taxes five years ago, or an historic brick through a government building window.
    You know the risk when you undertake the crime, it is entirely illegitimate to change the potential penalty for that crime later on and back date it. That way lies corruption and dictatorship.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 36,013
    JohnO said:

    James Clappison, the Conservative MP for Hertsmere is to stand down at the next election after 23 years. Allegedly this is not an entirely voluntary move. Dirty work at the cross roads? Is the Cameron Clique lining up someone for this safe seat?

    Source? Doubt Central Office (as was) would have had any involvement: long gone are the days when Constituency Associations would have deferred to the centre on putting pressure to ease out sitting MPs. So unless he has fallen out badly locally (which is unlikely) I imagine his retirement is voluntary as he announced a few days back.

    But maybe we will witness the Baron Clappers of Herstmere in the 2015 Dissolution Honours?

    PS Our own Sean Fear is a past Chairman of the Hertsmere Association if I recall.
    I wasn't aware that the Association hadn't readopted James. I do know that a lot of members were unhappy that he voted in favour of gay marriage, so that may be a factor.

  • Options
    welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,460

    MaxPB said:

    Just watched the BBC piece on the aircraft carrier. It all seems a bit premature, we don't have any planes for it until 2019 at the earliest which means it is useless until then unless the French want to borrow it as a platform for their air power in NATO operations.

    The Frog jets cannot use the QE - no catapults to launch them and no arrester wires to enable them to land. Design decisions made to save money meant that the original idea that "Cats and Traps" could be retrofitted went out of the window without anyone really noticing. The engineering and building of the QE has been a tremendous success. The project management and the political interference during the design stage was a total disgrace. Down, of course, to the treasury under the leadership of the malignant maniac Brown.
    Wow, is this how bad RN funding has got? HMS Quantitative Easing. I'd no idea. Still strangely appropriate really.
This discussion has been closed.