politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » ICM sees Ukip double its April share to 18 percent
Farage’s party hits record high with any pollster This evening ICM phone poll for the Guardian is the first survey we’ve had from any firm other than YouGov since Ukip performance in the May 2 local election.
If this isn't an aberrant poll, then the trend it indicates in UKIP support post-LEs is stunning. If UKIP get anywhere near doubling their support with other pollsters we will have out first UKIP 20% rating very soon, and maybe 25% if this continues. As Eagles says, the question is how long it lasts for. But I must admit I can't see them losing a huge amount in just 12 months of mid-term politics, and you have to wonder how much they can hold on to at the General. Surely they will double their 2010 result, that's 6% already. But if they can get 10% in 2015 that will torpedo Tory hopes.
For the three "main parties" that has to be the lowest combined polling score with ICM ever? Maybe when the Greens had a surge after Chernobyl would be close? Or the last Euros when UKIP, BNP and Green did well.
That is a shocking poll for all the "main parties"
Lib-Dems at 11% with ICM is especially atrocious. Lets not forget that Ming was toast at 13%
But this is why the sands are shifting under Cameron. This is why someone as economically esteemed as Lord Lawson has said he would vote OUT and the UK could survive perfectly well outside the EU.
The political earth is moving under the political class. It's no good Cameron acting as though his party is being unreasonable and getting Obama to support him as though that will make any difference.
It was inevitable that one of the main response's to eurogeddon would be a huge rise in euroscepticism. It's happening. Cameron must start getting a grip or his leadership will not survive whats about to happen.
"Labour's score of 34% is a miserable platform on which to build an election victory in 2015, and is its lowest since the immediate aftermath of Gordon Brown's ejection from power in July 2010."
It seems that 18% believe in fairies. ukip have not explained exactly what kind of relationship they want with the EU and how they would achieve it while still trading with them. Their immigration policy is "under review". There has been no explanation as to how immigration controls will work. Their economic "policy" is subject to random changes on a daily basis. They have promoted HS2 on a national basis yet seek to exploit concerns of those who will be disturbed by the project. It is a protest vote by people who are frustrated by many things and yet don't have any positive ideas. There was a fellow on Al-Beeb who is a senior member of an outfit called "Conservative Grassroots" who lambasted the EU for preventing us from deporting foreign terrorists, yet he had to be corrected by Pickles that the European Court has nothing to do with the EU. a ukip vote is a protest about many things but withour any real solutions.
FPT: "If Clegg does move on my money would now be on Tim Farron
He had a good Reynard-gate and Vote2013 aftermath"
He's been the most credible lib dem on the media for quite some time. Of course that isn't saying too much but Farron is always out there when the other leadership hopefuls just don't seem to be in it.
Bar one.
Those who think Vince isn't interested just because the twit Gove waded in, should perhaps read this.
Vince Cable: I could still lead Liberal Democrats at 70
Vince Cable has no intention of doing an Alex Ferguson - the Business Secretary turned 70 on Thursday but retirement is the last thing on his mind.
Clegg still seems to be ensconced in a bubble insisting he's "still in the saddle" after the lib dems took yet another big hit on their base in the council elections, but that base knows what is happening and it's extremely unlikely they will be fine with the suicidal notion of a toxic Clegg leading the election campaign in 2015.
No doubt the Cameroon spinners are praying Clegg will lead the lib dems into the election considering all those lib dem tory battlegrounds.
I agree. Labour will be shockingly short-sighted if they drop 4% between polls and think they can rely on FPTP to see them through. The voters that defect now may well permanently change their voting patterns if they're not quickly persuaded back. That should worry all the big parties losing votes to UKIP.
"ReluctantDissident 13 May 2013 6:09pm Recommend 4 Terrifying: a Conservative/UKIP/BNP coalition in 2015, exit from the EU, rearmament, radical redistribution, end of the social contract and war by 2020, civil or otherwise."
Just a bit of alternate history, Socrates! I'm undecided whether it should be full representation at Westminster, or a maybe a Austro-Hungarian style dual-monarchy.
Of course if I were King-Emperor, the British Empire/Commonwealth would be a fully democratic federation open to all English-speaking territories and even all territories liberated/occupied/administered by the UK and US throughout "real" history (yes, I have collated a list of them after several Wiki-browses!)
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
Really, on a 7% lead over the LibDumps? The model's broken.
There is no direct link to percentage share and bums on seats in the HoC. A fact that the Alliance in 83 and the Libs/LibDems upto 1997 know only too well. Indeed even the Tories found this to their cost in 2010.
Ukip's support is in too much measure too broadly spread, whereas the LibDems now have clusters of concerntrated support that allows them to ride out a substantial decline in national support.
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
The UKIP rise isn't, primarily, much to do with Europe.
"Nigel Farage is a public schoolboy, an erstwhile City trader, the sort of chap millions of Britons have come to despise after the financial crash."
"The ugly truth is that Farage and his gang are encouraging the hatred of the outsider, blaming them for all ills, just as the BNP and NF did in their time. "
"But they must know or need to know that some of the values and people attached to this party are xenophobic and deeply reactionary."
"Now politicians must find gumption and take on this malevolent force which is exploiting understandable public fears. Journalists, too, need to take Farage seriously and interrogate him as they do other politicians. The ultra-regressive Tea Party in the United States was seen off by incisive opponents. Ukip can and must be too."
Great job Lynton Crosby is doing for UKIP, how much are they paying him?
ICM/UKPR
Lab Maj 66 UKIP seats 0
Here's an interesting fact the Crosby fans might not remember. (or indeed wanted to be reminded of)
"It is worth considering Crosby's experience with the Libertas campaign, which contested elections to the European parliament in 2009. The party was formed by the Ireland-based businessman Declan Ganley, who spearheaded the no vote in Ireland's referendum on the EU's Lisbon treaty in 2008. With Crosby's help, it fielded more than 500 candidates a year later. All but one failed"
Crosby advised them to be ever more Eurosceptic in their posturing. Remind you of anything?
It's hard not to conclude those who were delighted with Cammie banging on about immigration, welfare and Europe are complete idiots.
At least there is plenty more time for the tories to bang on about them.
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
The UKIP rise isn't, primarily, much to do with Europe.
It's the third biggest concern to UKIP voters. Almost half of the first concern - immigration - is related to it. A major driver of the poor performance of the second concern - the economy - is the carnage of Europe's monetary union.
But you know you’ve touched a raw nerve when you start being denounced in the official annals. On Friday a Nationalist MSP from Glasgow, Bill Kidd, introduced a motion at Holyrood proposing:
Do all keep in mind that the voting question behind these figures was:
"The Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and other parties would fight a new election in your area. If there were a general election tomorrow which party do you think you would vote for?"
"Nigel Farage is a public schoolboy, an erstwhile City trader, the sort of chap millions of Britons have come to despise after the financial crash."
"The ugly truth is that Farage and his gang are encouraging the hatred of the outsider, blaming them for all ills, just as the BNP and NF did in their time. "
"But they must know or need to know that some of the values and people attached to this party are xenophobic and deeply reactionary."
"Now politicians must find gumption and take on this malevolent force which is exploiting understandable public fears. Journalists, too, need to take Farage seriously and interrogate him as they do other politicians. The ultra-regressive Tea Party in the United States was seen off by incisive opponents. Ukip can and must be too."
If UKIP are getting almost a fifth of the vote, seven points above the Lib Dems, there's no way the media can exclude them from the debates. It would be openly putting up two fingers to the electorate.
I'd be surprised if the UKIP surge had anything much to do with an EU referendum. It seems to me to be a more general (and deserved) wail of despair and comtempt aimed at the mediocrity of the current Big 3. As SeanT says, any attempt to predict the outcome of the next election based on these figures is pretty futile. They could mean anything. But we do know that UKIP will probably do best in the south and east, and worst to the point of invisibility in Scotland, with Wales not being that much better. The big imponderable right now is the big cities, including London. And it is almost certain that the LDs will get more MPs than UKIP even if their national vote drops into single figures.
It would be interesitng to know how many of the UKIP backers actually voted in 2010.
It seems that 18% believe in fairies. ukip have not explained exactly what kind of relationship they want with the EU and how they would achieve it while still trading with them. Their immigration policy is "under review". There has been no explanation as to how immigration controls will work. Their economic "policy" is subject to random changes on a daily basis. They have promoted HS2 on a national basis yet seek to exploit concerns of those who will be disturbed by the project. It is a protest vote by people who are frustrated by many things and yet don't have any positive ideas. There was a fellow on Al-Beeb who is a senior member of an outfit called "Conservative Grassroots" who lambasted the EU for preventing us from deporting foreign terrorists, yet he had to be corrected by Pickles that the European Court has nothing to do with the EU. a ukip vote is a protest about many things but withour any real solutions.
"It seems that 18% believe in fairies"
and why not ? You have more chance of a pledge getting met by the fairies than the PPE crowd. Since what the big 3 say isn't what they mean, what use is a manifesto anyway ?
As to the longevity of this figure, over on the Daily Telegraph there is a podcast in which Tim Stanley interviews Toby Young and Nigel Farage. Even under the very gentle probing by the avowedly right wing Young, Farage became flaky very quickly. Not sure how he would cope in a 3 week campaign when the focus is on him continually. In the end he is a euro-bore writ large rather than a full on right winger.
On the other hand I heard the self confessed political anorak Diane James the other day, and although just a tad charmless, you could see she was more than capable of withstanding tough questioning
Cammie decides to remind the Eurosceptics that his Cast Iron referendum is entirely conditional on renegotiation on a treaty that just isn't going to happen.
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
The UKIP rise isn't, primarily, much to do with Europe.
Almost half of the first concern - immigration - is related to it. A major driver of the poor performance of the second concern - the economy - is the carnage of Europe's monetary union.
Good grief.
Using mental gymnastics like that you could convince yourself that voters are hugely motivated by anything you care to mention, if you wanted to.
Concern about the NHS is related to the decline in bee populations.
If UKIP are getting almost a fifth of the vote, seven points above the Lib Dems, there's no way the media can exclude them from the debates. It would be openly putting up two fingers to the electorate.
Yes, as I wrote last week, PLUS the likely topping or near-topping of the polls [UKIP will not do as well in the cities} in the EU elections.
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
The UKIP rise isn't, primarily, much to do with Europe.
It's the third biggest concern to UKIP voters. Almost half of the first concern - immigration - is related to it. A major driver of the poor performance of the second concern - the economy - is the carnage of Europe's monetary union.
The political class also seems unable to accept that the public might actually LIKE UKIP's policies: leave Europe, reduce taxes, halt immigration, bring back the birch, etc.
FPTP has allowed the elite to believe that all voters are basically europhile liberals at heart, that's why the voters keep electing europhile liberal parties.
And yet, when the voters are, for the first time, offered a halfway plausible, populist rightwing party that isn't obviously a bunch of racist thugs, they flock to that standard.
Of course some of us, on here, predicted this on pb half a decade ago: if ever a decent rightwing Pym Fortuyn-ish party came along, they could hoover up significant support.
The big difference is that Pim Fortuyn could hope to win seats at an election. For UKIP even now it is probably a distant dream. If people really are serious about the party and its policies the pressure for electoral reform will become too intense to resist.
Notwithstanding anything else, that 28% for blue don't look too clever.
All Milliband has to do is remind a couple of % of the labour/kipper swingers of some of the more right wing policies espoused by the kippers - et voila. Big majority.
I'd like to see a by election where Lab and LD are the main 2 then see how UKiP stacks up. IF the Tories can persuade the electorate that they're serious about a referendum we may see the UKiP vote decimating (although that won't be enough) the vote share in these types of constituency.
The UKIP rise isn't, primarily, much to do with Europe.
Almost half of the first concern - immigration - is related to it. A major driver of the poor performance of the second concern - the economy - is the carnage of Europe's monetary union.
Good grief.
Using mental gymnastics like that you could convince yourself that voters are hugely motivated by anything you care to mention, if you wanted to.
Concern about the NHS is related to the decline in bee populations.
You really think current concerns about immigration are unrelated to Romania and Bulgaria? You really think that the constant bad economic news from Greece, Spain, Cyprus etc isn't related to the Euro?
If UKIP are getting almost a fifth of the vote, seven points above the Lib Dems, there's no way the media can exclude them from the debates. It would be openly putting up two fingers to the electorate.
Yes, as I wrote last week, PLUS the likely topping or near-topping of the polls [UKIP will not do as well in the cities} in the EU elections.
If UKIP are getting almost a fifth of the vote, seven points above the Lib Dems, there's no way the media can exclude them from the debates. It would be openly putting up two fingers to the electorate.
Certainly they can. Euro elections have always been treated separately to generals, and media coverage has traditionally often gone with results over polling (indeed polling was derided for a long time, still is to an extent).
Can they, yes. Will they, the negotiations will certainly be interesting.
Labour and the Lib Dems are going to have to face down these scared xenophobes, Lynton Crosby is de facto working for them, and Cameron shows no signs of having any Thatcherite balls.
Notwithstanding anything else, that 28% for blue don't look too clever.
All Milliband has to do is remind a couple of % of the labour/kipper swingers of some of the more right wing policies espoused by the kippers - et voila. Big majority.
34% for Labour, mid term, ought to be provoking a leadership crisis for Ed Milliband. It's an utterly dreadful position for Labour.
Even The Guardian, which can usually be relied upon to put the best spin possible on things for Labour, calls it a "miserable" poll for Labour.
And this is on the back of an incredibly lacklustre local election campaign for Labour.
Ed Miliband is no good. That may be the deciding factor over everything else in 2015....
Can we have a quote from Mike "UKIP are irrelevant" Smithson, Neil "Farage is useless" Irish-twit, and tim "UKIP are meaningless and take no votes" Wirral-dweller?
I WAS RIGHT AND YOU LOT WERE WRONG
Yep, you called it right, whilst a large number of experts got it wrong.
But UKIP should not get complacent: there is a heck of a long way for them to go; not just in time, but also to get a good number of bums on seats in the HoC. Local organisation is key, as is getting over the hurdle that prevents people from voting in the same manner at a GE as they did in local or European elections.
This might be a bubble and deflate in a few months, or it may be the start of something much bigger.
Not being particularly aligned to any one party, I'm relishing this. It's going to be a really interesting couple of years.
I must admit, the policy of UKIP's I particularly like is the flat tax. It would be very good for me. And what pensioner can help but like their policy of a citizens pension for all, regardless of their circumstance. OGH would do very well out of that.
Lower taxes, higher spending, and a reduced deficit. What's not to like?
Labour and the Lib Dems are going to have to face down these scared xenophobes, Lynton Crosby is de facto working for them, and Cameron shows no signs of having any Thatcherite balls.
Would you seriously allow EdM anywhere near Nigel Farage? It would be carnage. He is not the man to take on right wing populism. He has no idea why it exists. If it were me, I would be hoping and praying that the ex-major from Barnsley whose name I keep on forgetting has it in him to get a front-bench brief in the bear future. Or would I would make someone like Alan Johnson the UKIP shadow. UKIP needs to be tackled with normal, not tractor stats.
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
If those percentages were repeated at the next election it would be the end of FPTP.
Why? This wasn't: 1987 General Election. Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats. Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
The press may take a slightly different line this time. It would not only be a majority Labour government on a miserable 34% of the vote, but also the LDs with 35 MPs and UKIP with none, despite the latter getting way more votes. That is completely and utterly beyond the pale.
The "Theywon't win any seats because of FPTP" was a continual theme in the 80's - only the target was the Liberal & SDP. And since then what has happened.....
I suspect the same can happen to UKIP. They can concentrate on the east coast, draft in their better people, use their Councillors as an activist base etc etc.
The only difference that I can see is that whereas the Lib Dems are natural pavement politicians UKIP on the other hand are natural pub bores. Not sure if the Kippers are up to the graft needed.
If those percentages were repeated at the next election it would be the end of FPTP.
Why? This wasn't: 1987 General Election. Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats. Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
The press may take a slightly different line this time. It would not only be a majority Labour government on a miserable 34% of the vote, but also the LDs with 35 MPs and UKIP with none, despite the latter getting way more votes. That is completely and utterly beyond the pale.
It will be interesting to see if the combination of four party politics and FPTP brings us a truly anomalous general election result at some point. If Labour were to win a majority on 30-33% of the vote, I would count that as decidedly unhealthy for democracy.
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
Of course. As the prophet Nick Ridley warned the Euro is "a German racket designed to take over the whole of Europe"
If those percentages were repeated at the next election it would be the end of FPTP.
Why? This wasn't: 1987 General Election. Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats. Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
The press may take a slightly different line this time. It would not only be a majority Labour government on a miserable 34% of the vote, but also the LDs with 35 MPs and UKIP with none, despite the latter getting way more votes. That is completely and utterly beyond the pale.
It will be interesting to see if the combination of four party politics and FPTP brings us a truly anomalous general election result at some point. If Labour were to win a majority on 30-33% of the vote, I would count that as decidedly unhealthy for democracy.
You mean we need a directly elected Dictator, I mean PM?
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
As Boris ponts out in his column today, the EU is not the reason for the UK's long history of poor productivity, poor management and lack of investment in infrastructure. We have done that to ourselves. To get a trade surplus with China or anywhere else we need to sell stuff that the Chinese want to buy.
If those percentages were repeated at the next election it would be the end of FPTP.
Why? This wasn't: 1987 General Election. Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats. Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
The press may take a slightly different line this time. It would not only be a majority Labour government on a miserable 34% of the vote, but also the LDs with 35 MPs and UKIP with none, despite the latter getting way more votes. That is completely and utterly beyond the pale.
It will be interesting to see if the combination of four party politics and FPTP brings us a truly anomalous general election result at some point. If Labour were to win a majority on 30-33% of the vote, I would count that as decidedly unhealthy for democracy.
It's quite possible. It was unhealthy for democracy for Labour to win a majority on 36% of the vote or whatever it was in 2005.
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
Germany is clearly benefitting from the capital outflows from the rest of Europe, and an undervalued currency due to Eurozone membership.
I'm not sure anyone has ever argued we'd get a trade surplus with China if we left.
I simply cannot see 18% of British people voting for a party of which the only politician they know or have even heard of is Nigel Farage. What we're seeing at the moment is bravado.
Farage has had a free ride, there's a bonus waiting for the person who pricks his bubble. And Cameron will go nowhere near him.
I suppose in many ways Ed Balls is the man to give Farage a kicking, after all he's the man who kept Britiain out of the Euro and opposed British membership of the ERM when the Tories were in favour of it. And the recent poll suggests the public see him as a hard man.
You're doing that on purpose!
Alan Johnson is perfect in my view. He speaks, looks, acts and understands normal. Cruddas might be another. EdM would be a guaranteed disaster.
Tim. Wrong, Balls vs Farage would just turn into a cock waving contest and Farage is more personally popular. the person to confront Farage is a woman as he could struggle to deal with it. Perhaps It's time Rachel Reeves made a name for herself..
Tim. Wrong, Balls vs Farage would just turn into a cock waving contest and Farage is more personally popular. the person to confront Farage is a woman as he could struggle to deal with it. Perhaps It's time Rachel Reeves made a name for herself..
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
As Boris ponts out in his column today, the EU is not the reason for the UK's long history of poor productivity, poor management and lack of investment in infrastructure. We have done that to ourselves. To get a trade surplus with China or anywhere else we need to sell stuff that the Chinese want to buy.
Better management practices and higher productivity are most driven by higher competition with other high productivity firms. LSE have done some great work on this. The most productive firms in the world are those in the US. Thus the best way UK firms can have their productivity boosted is for them to be exposed to open competition with USA. To do that we have to get a genuinely expansive EU-US trade deal, which won't happen because the French will nix it, or to join NAFTA.
The forecast models for how vote share turns into seats also exaggerates how evenly UKIP's share distributes, because obviously it doesn't have much to go on to bias that.
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
As Boris ponts out in his column today, the EU is not the reason for the UK's long history of poor productivity, poor management and lack of investment in infrastructure. We have done that to ourselves. To get a trade surplus with China or anywhere else we need to sell stuff that the Chinese want to buy.
Better management practices and higher productivity are most driven by higher competition with other high productivity firms. LSE have done some great work on this. The most productive firms in the world are those in the US. Thus the best way UK firms can have their productivity boosted is for them to be exposed to open competition with USA. To do that we have to get a genuinely expansive EU-US trade deal, which won't happen because the French will nix it, or to join NAFTA.
We have had a free trade agreement with the Germans for nearly 40 years and it has not done much to help us match the quality of their management, their willingness to invest or the productivity of their workforce - pre-euro and post. Short-termism is a long-term British disease. Even if we could negotiate a trade deal with the US or join NAFTA (unlikely in my view, but we can agree to disagree on that) we are still looking at something like 10 years hence. Then another five years plus for such an agreement to make any difference. We need to start dealing with our real problems now.
Better management practices and higher productivity are most driven by higher competition with other high productivity firms. LSE have done some great work on this. The most productive firms in the world are those in the US. Thus the best way UK firms can have their productivity boosted is for them to be exposed to open competition with USA. To do that we have to get a genuinely expansive EU-US trade deal, which won't happen because the French will nix it, or to join NAFTA.
Whilst that sounds sensible enough in one sense, it's hard to reconcile with European experience. Are German firms exposed to competition more than British firms are? Rather the reverse, surely?
If those percentages were repeated at the next election it would be the end of FPTP.
Why? This wasn't: 1987 General Election. Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats. Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
The press may take a slightly different line this time. It would not only be a majority Labour government on a miserable 34% of the vote, but also the LDs with 35 MPs and UKIP with none, despite the latter getting way more votes. That is completely and utterly beyond the pale.
I'll completely agree with you, depsite the fact we've just had a referendum on the voting system which under normal circumstances would silence the question for a generation we will need to revisit it pdq I think.
Oh dear Sunny. It's clear you are better suited to, ahem, working yourself into a frenzy over trains than politics, since it's not me who keeps answering differently when asked if you are you a UKIP supporter or a tory.
That would be you sunny.
I'm SNP and I've campaigned for them and will keep doing so. Who are you going to campaign for when you grow up Sunny? Tory or UKIP?
I'll completely agree with you, depsite the fact we've just had a referendum on the voting system which under normal circumstances would silence the question for a generation we will need to revisit it pdq I think.
Yes, we could go for something like the Italian system. That worked out well on a similar None Of The Above surge, didn't it?
Comments
But is it here to stay?
That's good to know, that was my first reaction to this poll.
The harsh fact is that Con Lab, Lib are divided parties and are being punished by the voters.
UKIP is+9
Where have the other 3 gone? For "others" that would seem a pretty big move as well.
However, Grillo didn't need to keep his balls in the air for two years.
Lib-Dems at 11% with ICM is especially atrocious. Lets not forget that Ming was toast at 13%
But this is why the sands are shifting under Cameron. This is why someone as economically esteemed as Lord Lawson has said he would vote OUT and the UK could survive perfectly well outside the EU.
The political earth is moving under the political class. It's no good Cameron acting as though his party is being unreasonable and getting Obama to support him as though that will make any difference.
It was inevitable that one of the main response's to eurogeddon would be a huge rise in euroscepticism. It's happening. Cameron must start getting a grip or his leadership will not survive whats about to happen.
If UKIP does start to wobble where will the votes go? Now they are prised loose that may be very hard to predict.
When will @DPJHodges acknowledge the precision of Ed Miliband's 35% strategy? Only 1% off in the new ICM poll
If they aren't in first place next month then we can say they've stalled are going backwards.
"Labour's score of 34% is a miserable platform on which to build an election victory in 2015, and is its lowest since the immediate aftermath of Gordon Brown's ejection from power in July 2010."
Are you guessing BNP gets the 3% or have you looked it up?
Really, on a 7% lead over the LibDumps? The model's broken.
He had a good Reynard-gate and Vote2013 aftermath"
He's been the most credible lib dem on the media for quite some time. Of course that isn't saying too much but Farron is always out there when the other leadership hopefuls just don't seem to be in it.
Bar one.
Those who think Vince isn't interested just because the twit Gove waded in, should perhaps read this. Clegg still seems to be ensconced in a bubble insisting he's "still in the saddle" after the lib dems took yet another big hit on their base in the council elections, but that base knows what is happening and it's extremely unlikely they will be fine with the suicidal notion of a toxic Clegg leading the election campaign in 2015.
No doubt the Cameroon spinners are praying Clegg will lead the lib dems into the election considering all those lib dem tory battlegrounds.
I agree. Labour will be shockingly short-sighted if they drop 4% between polls and think they can rely on FPTP to see them through. The voters that defect now may well permanently change their voting patterns if they're not quickly persuaded back. That should worry all the big parties losing votes to UKIP.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/13/farage-factor-ukip-support-record
"ReluctantDissident
13 May 2013 6:09pm
Recommend
4
Terrifying: a Conservative/UKIP/BNP coalition in 2015, exit from the EU, rearmament, radical redistribution, end of the social contract and war by 2020, civil or otherwise."
The Tories need to talk about immigration and Europe more...
Yes. Go on calling UKIP voters "fairies". That approach is working wonders so far.
FPT Just a bit of alternate history, Socrates!
I'm undecided whether it should be full representation at Westminster, or a maybe a Austro-Hungarian style dual-monarchy.
Of course if I were King-Emperor, the British Empire/Commonwealth would be a fully democratic federation open to all English-speaking territories and even all territories liberated/occupied/administered by the UK and US throughout "real" history (yes, I have collated a list of them after several Wiki-browses!)
sincerely,
His Britanno-American Majesty, Emperor Sunil I.
Tories/UKIP 46% (+5)
Euroholics 45% (-8)
Ukip's support is in too much measure too broadly spread, whereas the LibDems now have clusters of concerntrated support that allows them to ride out a substantial decline in national support.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/dont-be-fooled-by-ukips-charm-it-is-xenophobic-and-creates-fear-8612768.html
"Nigel Farage is a public schoolboy, an erstwhile City trader, the sort of chap millions of Britons have come to despise after the financial crash."
"The ugly truth is that Farage and his gang are encouraging the hatred of the outsider, blaming them for all ills, just as the BNP and NF did in their time. "
"But they must know or need to know that some of the values and people attached to this party are xenophobic and deeply reactionary."
"Now politicians must find gumption and take on this malevolent force which is exploiting understandable public fears. Journalists, too, need to take Farage seriously and interrogate him as they do other politicians. The ultra-regressive Tea Party in the United States was seen off by incisive opponents. Ukip can and must be too."
"It is worth considering Crosby's experience with the Libertas campaign, which contested elections to the European parliament in 2009. The party was formed by the Ireland-based businessman Declan Ganley, who spearheaded the no vote in Ireland's referendum on the EU's Lisbon treaty in 2008. With Crosby's help, it fielded more than 500 candidates a year later. All but one failed"
Crosby advised them to be ever more Eurosceptic in their posturing. Remind you of anything?
It's hard not to conclude those who were delighted with Cammie banging on about immigration, welfare and Europe are complete idiots.
At least there is plenty more time for the tories to bang on about them.
Baroness Timsis Back!
I did say if UKIP did well here tim would call all non labour voters racist
We are the proles and the Inner party dont like it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5w4ylfQycM
But you know you’ve touched a raw nerve when you start being denounced in the official annals. On Friday a Nationalist MSP from Glasgow, Bill Kidd, introduced a motion at Holyrood proposing:
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2013/05/trident-the-snp-shoots-the-messenger/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trident-the-snp-shoots-the-messenger&utm_source=Lord+Ashcroft+Polls&utm_campaign=18f9a010b8-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b70c7aec0a-18f9a010b8-50043421
"The Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and other parties would fight a new election in your area. If there were a general election tomorrow which party do you think you would vote for?"
2+2=5
2+2=5
2+2=5
2+2=5
2+2=5
2+2=5
It would be interesitng to know how many of the UKIP backers actually voted in 2010.
and why not ? You have more chance of a pledge getting met by the fairies than the PPE crowd. Since what the big 3 say isn't what they mean, what use is a manifesto anyway ?
The general public have had enough of these sneering cock-wombles telling them what to do.
"UKIP are just about hatred and dividing people. Besides, Farage is one of those bastard banker types."
On the other hand I heard the self confessed political anorak Diane James the other day, and although just a tad charmless, you could see she was more than capable of withstanding tough questioning
And Labour's policies are...?
Exactly.
Maybe I've got this wrong and EdMs right. Since the big 3 routinely break their manifesto pledges maybe not bothering to have any is the way to go.
Only John Major can save them now. ;^ )
Using mental gymnastics like that you could convince yourself that voters are hugely motivated by anything you care to mention, if you wanted to.
Concern about the NHS is related to the decline in bee populations.
Keeping rEd out of a debate would add 5% to the Labour vote.
All Milliband has to do is remind a couple of % of the labour/kipper swingers of some of the more right wing policies espoused by the kippers - et voila. Big majority.
This wasn't:
1987 General Election.
Labour in Scotland, 1.25m votes = 50 seats.
Alliance in England, 6.25m votes = 10 seats.
Can they, yes. Will they, the negotiations will certainly be interesting.
Even The Guardian, which can usually be relied upon to put the best spin possible on things for Labour, calls it a "miserable" poll for Labour.
And this is on the back of an incredibly lacklustre local election campaign for Labour.
Ed Miliband is no good. That may be the deciding factor over everything else in 2015....
But UKIP should not get complacent: there is a heck of a long way for them to go; not just in time, but also to get a good number of bums on seats in the HoC. Local organisation is key, as is getting over the hurdle that prevents people from voting in the same manner at a GE as they did in local or European elections.
This might be a bubble and deflate in a few months, or it may be the start of something much bigger.
Not being particularly aligned to any one party, I'm relishing this. It's going to be a really interesting couple of years.
I must admit, the policy of UKIP's I particularly like is the flat tax. It would be very good for me. And what pensioner can help but like their policy of a citizens pension for all, regardless of their circumstance. OGH would do very well out of that.
Lower taxes, higher spending, and a reduced deficit. What's not to like?
@BBCNormanS: Labour sources confirm Labour will vote against EU referendum amendment on wed
in 2008, 2 years prior to the General election, the Tories were on 41, and Labour were on 27
It is - of course - worth pointing out that the country at the heart of the Eurozone, Germany, is not suffering from the debilitating effects of the Euro. Its unemployment is at a 20 year low, and it runs a large trade surplus.
That isn't to say that Spain and Ireland haven't been hammered by the Euro, but it is odd to say that if we left the EU we'd be able to get to trade surplus with China, when Germany has clearly not been hampered either by the EU or the Euro in achieving selfsame.
I suspect the same can happen to UKIP. They can concentrate on the east coast, draft in their better people, use their Councillors as an activist base etc etc.
The only difference that I can see is that whereas the Lib Dems are natural pavement politicians UKIP on the other hand are natural pub bores. Not sure if the Kippers are up to the graft needed.
It will be interesting to see if the combination of four party politics and FPTP brings us a truly anomalous general election result at some point. If Labour were to win a majority on 30-33% of the vote, I would count that as decidedly unhealthy for democracy.
I'm not sure anyone has ever argued we'd get a trade surplus with China if we left.
I think Fat Ed would get a nasty shock in a head to head with Farage.
Alan Johnson is perfect in my view. He speaks, looks, acts and understands normal. Cruddas might be another. EdM would be a guaranteed disaster.
Tory Eurosceptics really are that gullible.
UKIP leader Nigel Farage offers to endorse Eurosceptic Tory MPs with his party's logo as a stamp of approval in the 2015 election
Anti-EU candidates can have two logos against name, UKIP leader says
Cameron's Washington trip overshadowed by questions about Brussels
Farage rules out full pact without a new Tory leader
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2323870/UKIP-leader-Nigel-Farage-offers-endorse-Eurosceptic-Tory-MPs-partys-logo-stamp-approval-2015-election.html
There'll be an increased demand from Labour for an examination of UKIP's policies. They'd better be careful we might notice Ed's blank sheet.
Do you still think you can control them, Ed and David?
He’s shaped like a giant pair of testicles, and holy cow is he terrifying.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/there-is-a-brazilian-mascot-for-testicular-cancer-named-mr-b
That would be you sunny.
I'm SNP and I've campaigned for them and will keep doing so. Who are you going to campaign for when you grow up Sunny? Tory or UKIP?
Still waiting.
Granted that was from 2% to 4%