Misinformation online has become commonplace. It has fuelled riots and disorder and maybe propelled a few people into office. But is misinformation just a random process, or is it driven by particular actors? Is it seen on both the left and right of politics? Petter Törnberg and Juliana Chueri sought to answer this in a research paper just published in The International Journal of Press/Politics. They analysed 32 million tweets from parliamentarians in 26 different countries (including the UK, US, Ireland, France, Germany, Canada, Australia and Poland) across 6 years. They considered how populist parties were, how left or right-wing, whether in government or opposition, and what broad party family they were in: green (Eco), left, social democratic (SD), liberal (Lib), Christian democratic (CD), conservative (Cons), radical right (RR), agrarian (Agr), ethnic (Eth), or single issue (SI).
Comments
And first
Hm, Tory category not doing too great either. But to be fair the error ranges could mean they are down in the gutter, or up in the angelic choir with the other parties, for all one knows. And the Tories are only one of a number of parties in the mix.
https://x.com/RobertJenrick/status/1882684767742951702
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2dxj570n21o
Apple up slightly.
When some wazzock Tory stands in front of a new building at the existing hospital saying its a new hospital, or responds to a crime crisis caused by no police by saying 20,000 more, it winds people up.
Jenrick may well be a moron - he gives off that impression. As did so many of the Tory intake of 2019. But even the smart ones repeat the same guff, because they think voters are stupid.
The dangerous ones are those who know fully well that what they are saying is an absolute lie and yet say it anyway. Why? Because their belief is that a combination of low-information voter plus disinformation media will equal people repeating the lie they've been told as if it is fact. Best still when then get people angry about the other side telling them what to think, and then programming them with what to think.
I despise that kind of politician.
I would never use headlines that could be considered clickbait.
I would have expected the highest scores to be among social democrats, christian democrats and liberals. But maybe they have a higher tendency towards party political spin against their direct rivals.
For past experience (in England) I became involved at the periphery of one such case and they are extremely difficult to spot. The guilt from not spotting it will be with me forever.
Constellation Energy
Arista Networks
NRG Energy
Quanta Services
Broadcom
Eaton
Nvidia
Digital Realty
Is there a relaxation of the rules ?
Thanks
https://x.com/20gimsack/status/1883497522813092212
The topic is still verboten until further notice.
https://www.chards.co.uk/gold-price/gold-price-history
(see the words "research paper" in the phrase "Petter Törnberg and Juliana Chueri sought to answer this in a research paper..."? Click on that.)
Watching this week's silent witness on iPlayer. Really good, catch it if you can...
But that shouldn't invalidate the results.
It's stuff like this that makes me very sceptical of the flat productivity figures.
I got a small drone for Christmas about 5 years ago. It was so rubbish I couldn't even manage to keep it in the same field on a breezy day, and the photos were terrible. Put me off drones for years. Now I'm wishing I'd just got a more expensive one to start with.
VW prepared to hand its factories to Chinese electric carmakers
https://www.nme.com/news/music/britains-largest-choir-stop-performing-the-police-every-breath-you-take-3831072
It’s also a bit misleading the claim that they analysed 32million tweets where in the paper they say they drew on a database of 32m tweets to search URLs which is a bit different.
The research checked these URLs against other databases for “fake news” but doesn’t analyse if the tweets without attachments or links contained misinformation.
Not saying their conclusions don’t match reality but using a study to show misinformation from a particular political wing which could be misinformative is
interesting.
The solution is easy, as with most things, he needs to hire more (well remunerated) lawyers to fix the problems.
If you prosecute a crime lots, then it will appear you have lots of that crime.
Since @DavidL is prosecuting away like crazy…
https://archive.is/2025.01.26-092330/https://www.thenational.scot/news/24884108.uk-neo-nazi-groups-really-excited-elon-musk-salute/
Humans can often work out for themselves if they should stalk people because Sting sang about a stalker or if they shouldn’t - I was stalked by a woman and would hazard she didn’t do it because of a song.
https://store.dji.com/product/dji-mini-4k?from=store_homepage&vid=166281
The toy ones are uncontrollable outside on anything other than a dead calm day, and the heavier ones require formal training and licensing for commercial use.
He moved onto another actress, Trudy Styler, and got into Tantric Love with 6 hour lovemaking sessions and the like. Takes all sorts i guess.