Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

There is no happy ending for Bobby J – politicalbetting.com

1246789

Comments

  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,119

    We need a psephological category for people who voted like you in 2024. How about "Starmer's Strivers"?
    There seem to be quite a disparate group of us on PB.com who voted Labour for the first time, or at least the first time in a long time, at the GE. The only thing that seems to unite us is the belief that the Tory government had completely jumped the shark, and the country couldn't move on until they were ejected from office. So perhaps something like,

    Starmer's Standards Stormtroopers

    It's particularly striking given that Labour's poll share at the GE was surprisingly low, that there were so many of us lending our vote to them last time.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,164
    edited November 2024
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/11/02/mummy-won-kick-backside-kemi-badenoch/

    Tim Stanley - ‘Mummy won and I’m very happy’ – she’ll give this country the kick up the backside it needs
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,277
    edited November 2024
    PMQs should be a bit more interesting . Badenoch is a bit of a mystery for most of the public and it will be interesting to see how she performs in her new role.

  • eekeek Posts: 29,399
    So the F1 commentary team are commentating on the safety car lap - can’t see qualifying being in the near future
  • Sean_F said:

    David Tennant proves that he is an arsehole.
    David Tennant is lovely.

    He's the father of a trans child.

    He's immensely protective of them.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,448

    You really are a blue Corbynite.

    Chase after Farage and his bunch of racists, nuts and loons and I won't be the only ex Tory voting Labour to keep you and him out of office.
    While not all Reform voters are racist it seems a fair number are the "Tommy Robinson Tendency". It was notable that the Reform polling noticably ticked up when Sunak became leader. I suspect that Kemi won't win over those voters, but I think that a good thing for the Conservative Party.

    I shall be interested who she brings onto the Front Bench that she installs. I don't believe in "The Blob" in the sense of an inertia riddled Civil Service, but I think it does exist in the wider sense. Even the most modest of changes to welfare entitlements or to tax policy involving a mere 3.5% change in UK tax revenue creates a furore as if the sky is falling, not just within the press and social media but also the financial markets. Proposing anything like Truss or Corbyn would probably be impossible now.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,863
    HYUFD said:

    For now, remember Badenoch beat Jenrick by slightly less than Truss beat Sunak.

    If she fails Jenrich or Rees Mogg will be waiting in the wings to replace her as leader.

    However Kemi has a mandate and I will support her as leader until the next general election as we need to get rid of this awful Labour government above all else
    Rees Mogg isn't an MP.
  • ydoethur said:

    Rees Mogg isn't an MP.
    Some good news for the Conservative Party from the last election.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    ydoethur said:

    Rees Mogg isn't an MP.
    On this week's BMG poll Rees Mogg would win back his Somerset seat from Labour at the next general election
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100
    edited November 2024
    Driver said:

    23.7 vs 14.3 is "only a few percentage points"?

    And can you remind me of the current makeup of Reform's target seats?
    So complacent. The SDP had zero % of the vote in 79 and nearly came second in 83. The Tories are more vulnerable than they have ever been. They lost Horsham and Chichester last time. Yet that is ignored. Weird.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,099
    FPT:

    Same here but I know why I have the feeling of unease.

    It's a direct consequence of the feeling of unease I have that there is a large enough proportion of the Tory membership who are racist to tip the balance.

    My suspicions were misplaced, I was wrong. Regardless of the quality or otherwise of the victor, I think it's a huge positive that the Troy membership has elected a black leader.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 9,348
    Barnesian said:

    There is more to this story. Normally Councillors do not get involved in planning issues. A Councillor would have to "call it in". It seems unlikely in the extreme that a Councillor of any party would call in a planning issue to delay things and increase costs to a charity. It just doesn't ring true.
    I have personal knowledge of this.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    I didn't vote for, and opposed, the tax rising budget last week.

    Just as I opposed the tax rising budgets in the last few years by the Conservatives.

    Unfortunately with your party preventing enough homes from being built, a policy you personally vehemently champion, Starmer's party was the least worst option this year.

    You are just as anti business and high tax as Starmer. Until you stop supporting planning restrictions, the triple lock, blowing money on things like the winter fuel allowance etc there is no difference between them and you in being high tax.
    It was of course Jenrick most vehemently pushing new homes.

    The fact you want to throw our core vote pensioners on the scrap heap by scrapping the winter fuel allowance and triple fuel allowance confirms we are much better off at the moment without you.

    In government the Tories at least kept winter fuel allowance and didn't raise NI on employers or CGT or hammer farmers as Labour has
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    HYUFD said:

    Corbyn got 40% of the vote in 2017, higher than Starmer, Brown or Ed Miliband or even Blair in 2005 got and a hung parliament by uniting the left behind him. Under FPTP or even PR not impossible a united right can win
    "The Right" has already lost its left flank to the Lib Dems and in some cases even to Labour. Lurching further rightwards and any remaining One Nation types will be saying goodbye to the Tories too.

    And as been said on here many, many times, not all ReFuk voters are Tories on a gap year. Many have never voted, and would never vote, Conservative.
  • HYUFD said:

    It was of course Jenrick most vehemently pushing new homes.

    The fact you want to throw our core vote pensioners on the scrap heap by scrapping the winter fuel allowance confirms we are much better off at the moment without you.
    The fact you want to pamper your "core vote" with taxpayers money for no good reason other than they vote for you confirms you're not fit for office.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,639
    Foxy said:

    While not all Reform voters are racist it seems a fair number are the "Tommy Robinson Tendency". It was notable that the Reform polling noticably ticked up when Sunak became leader. I suspect that Kemi won't win over those voters, but I think that a good thing for the Conservative Party.

    I shall be interested who she brings onto the Front Bench that she installs. I don't believe in "The Blob" in the sense of an inertia riddled Civil Service, but I think it does exist in the wider sense. Even the most modest of changes to welfare entitlements or to tax policy involving a mere 3.5% change in UK tax revenue creates a furore as if the sky is falling, not just within the press and social media but also the financial markets. Proposing anything like Truss or Corbyn would probably be impossible now.
    Rishi's government was characterised by other things than his race though. Primarily, it was thought by many conservatives not to be particularly conservative - on tax and spend, on immigration, etc. That, far more than Rishi's akin colour, explains the leak to Reform.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,476
    Foxy said:

    While not all Reform voters are racist it seems a fair number are the "Tommy Robinson Tendency". It was notable that the Reform polling noticably ticked up when Sunak became leader. I suspect that Kemi won't win over those voters, but I think that a good thing for the Conservative Party.

    I shall be interested who she brings onto the Front Bench that she installs. I don't believe in "The Blob" in the sense of an inertia riddled Civil Service, but I think it does exist in the wider sense. Even the most modest of changes to welfare entitlements or to tax policy involving a mere 3.5% change in UK tax revenue creates a furore as if the sky is falling, not just within the press and social media but also the financial markets. Proposing anything like Truss or Corbyn would probably be impossible now.
    Ha

    It was always thus. Because government is merely the largest of organisations. So if you propose to change anything, a horde of people will have their rice bowl broken.

    Eliminate a report? - there’s a whole department that lives off that report. Feeds their children off it. Will retire from it.

    Which is why, if Starmer, say, turns his eye on the pace at which we can approve the construction of homes, a horde of skeletons will pop out of the ground and attack him. Just like in Jason and the Argonauts.

    Thatcher smashed a lot of rice bowls - some in surprising places. She changed *the culture* of the system.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,559
    Jonathan said:

    So complacent. The SDP had zero % of the vote in 79 and nearly came second in 83. The Tories are more vulnerable than they have ever been. They lost Horsham and Chichester last time. Yet that is ignored. Weird.
    You could try responding to the points you're quoting rather than deflecting. You might find it fun.
  • Laugh, I nearly did.



    Josh Fenton-Glynn MP @JoshFG

    Do Labour MPs now have to declare this as a gift?

    https://x.com/JoshFG/status/1852690130554806405
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,047
    edited November 2024

    David Tennant is lovely.

    He's the father of a trans child.

    He's immensely protective of them.
    So protection extends to personal abuse then?
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,639
    nico679 said:

    PMQs should be a bit more interesting . Badenoch is a bit of a mystery for most of the public and it will be interesting to see how she performs in her new role.

    This is a good piece for anyone looking to understand a certain sort of Tory mindset right now, and well worth using the 12 foot ladder to read.

    Did Bob Blackman really introduce her like that though? What a chump. If that had been how Labour or the LDs had introduced a new leader we would have rightly castigated them for it.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,559
    HYUFD said:

    It was of course Jenrick most vehemently pushing new homes.

    The fact you want to throw our core vote pensioners on the scrap heap by scrapping the winter fuel allowance and triple fuel allowance confirms we are much better off at the moment without you.

    In government the Tories at least kept winter fuel allowance and didn't raise NI on employers or CGT or hammer farmers as Labour has
    Do I have to wait until I'm a pensioner before the Tories do anything for me?
  • FPT:


    My suspicions were misplaced, I was wrong. Regardless of the quality or otherwise of the victor, I think it's a huge positive that the Troy membership has elected a black leader.
    We don't need your Woke takes, thanks.

    We've elected Kemi. Not a "black leader".

    This shit is (thankfully) on its way out and you need to wise up to it.
  • HYUFD said:

    It was of course Jenrick most vehemently pushing new homes.

    The fact you want to throw our core vote pensioners on the scrap heap by scrapping the winter fuel allowance and triple fuel allowance confirms we are much better off at the moment without you.

    In government the Tories at least kept winter fuel allowance and didn't raise NI on employers or CGT or hammer farmers as Labour has
    Just stop it will you

    Many would say the party would be better without you

    Join Reform
  • Driver said:

    Do I have to wait until I'm a pensioner before the Tories do anything for me?
    It's amusing how he's complaining about taxes going up while complaining about spending being cut.

    If the Tories were serious about cutting taxes, or not raising them, they'd have cut the winter fuel allowance themselves.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100
    Driver said:

    You could try responding to the points you're quoting rather than deflecting. You might find it fun.
    Eh? The gap is less than 10%, which is mind blowing. The Reform seats are irrelevant, it’s the seats they denied the Tories (and might continue to deny the Tories) that matter. I would say that the Tories only won 120 seats might bother them strategically.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,559

    "The Right" has already lost its left flank to the Lib Dems and in some cases even to Labour. Lurching further rightwards and any remaining One Nation types will be saying goodbye to the Tories too.

    And as been said on here many, many times, not all ReFuk voters are Tories on a gap year. Many have never voted, and would never vote, Conservative.
    And a good chunk of the rest voted Tory for the first time in 2019 and never will again.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,639
    Cookie said:

    This is a good piece for anyone looking to understand a certain sort of Tory mindset right now, and well worth using the 12 foot ladder to read.

    Did Bob Blackman really introduce her like that though? What a chump. If that had been how Labour or the LDs had introduced a new leader we would have rightly castigated them for it.
    Sorry, quote cockup! The above was meant in reply to this post:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/11/02/mummy-won-kick-backside-kemi-badenoch/

    Tim Stanley - ‘Mummy won and I’m very happy’ – she’ll give this country the kick up the backside it needs

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    Just stop it will you

    Many would say the party would be better without you

    Join Reform
    No I won't join Reform, I have always voted Conservative and to re elect Tory PMs and their governments at every general election since 18 unlike you and Bart.

    However it is also clear we cannot get a Conservative majority again without winning back some former Conservative voters now voting Reform. Otherwise at best the Tories could get a hung parliament and would have to form a government with Reform support or less likely now the LDs again
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100
    edited November 2024

    So protection extends to personal abuse then?
    Have you ever been upset and commented publicly in strong terms when political matters impact your children?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,004

    There seem to be quite a disparate group of us on PB.com who voted Labour for the first time, or at least the first time in a long time, at the GE. The only thing that seems to unite us is the belief that the Tory government had completely jumped the shark, and the country couldn't move on until they were ejected from office. So perhaps something like,

    Starmer's Standards Stormtroopers

    It's particularly striking given that Labour's poll share at the GE was surprisingly low, that there were so many of us lending our vote to them last time.
    PB is desperately atypical I think. Most people know who they're going to vote for but often have difficulty getting to the polling booth ...
    PBers to a man (And woman) know we're going to vote and then decide who for.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    Driver said:

    Do I have to wait until I'm a pensioner before the Tories do anything for me?
    If you are an employer hammered by Labour's NI tax rise, if an investor hammered by Labour's CGT rise, if a farmer hammered by Labour's IHT rise clearly not
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,766
    Jonathan said:

    Have you ever been upset and commented publicly in strong terms when political matters impact your children?
    heh
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,917
    edited November 2024
    Things not moving in the right direction for Trump with the latest 538 forecast.

    Chance of winning

    Trump 50.4%
    Harris 49.4%

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,448
    kyf_100 said:

    Even the tweet mocking David Tennant today is a low blow.

    One of Tennant's children is, IIRC, trans / gender non-conforming.

    To use an analogy people on here might understand, Leon didn't just get the banhammer for casual racism, it was because he offended to the core people whose partners and children are non-white, by implying their loved ones had less value than 'white babies'. And that felt like a visceral, personal attack.

    To some of us, trans people aren't just strange concepts that only exist in theory, they are our friends, family and loved ones. And when people make comments that seek to erase their existence, as Rowling frequently does, e.g. with the casual misgendering, it wounds to the very core.

    Rowling's transphobia is out there in the open for all to see.

    I don't want to get involved in a long, drawn out debate on the trans issue. But I do want to stand up for, and speak up for, the people I love.

    David Tennant wasn't some rich lefty engaging in virtue signalling. He was a father standing up for his child's right to exist.

    Nobody should be made to feel less valid as a human being because of the colour of their skin, their sexuality, or their gender identity. Rowling, sadly, has a great deal of form with the latter.
    Thanks for this.

    Being Trans seemed a peculiar theoretical to me, but a couple of years back a friend of Fox jr2 who he has known since they were in Beavers together, and still flatshare came out as Trans and now uses female pronouns. She has not yet had either hormonal or surgical treatment, mostly because of difficulties accessing gender affirming treatment. Fox jr2 reckons coming out as Trans has saved her life.

    They are the same kind, generous person that I have known for years, and deserve kindness and generosity of spirit as they set out on what is clearly going to be a life where people are prejudiced against her and consider her a threat.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,639
    Apologies if this has already been posted: there was speculation earlier about which Labour MP would win the race to make an arse of herself in her reaction to Kemi's election, with Dawn Butler hot favourite: it seems this is one race which the favourite won:
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/11/02/labour-mp-shares-post-badenoch-blackface-white-supremacy/
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    Driver said:

    Do I have to wait until I'm a pensioner before the Tories do anything for me?
    That depends how old you are. They might have shut down your Sure Start centre when you were a toddler. Or trebled your tuition fees when you went to university. Or even increased the time you had to wait for NHS treatment from a few weeks to many months.

    Thank goodness they aren't in a position to do anything else for you.
  • HYUFD said:

    If you are an employer hammered by Labour's NI tax rise, if an investor hammered by Labour's CGT rise, if a farmer hammered by Labour's IHT rise clearly not
    You speak as if the Tories weren't raising taxes themselves.

    And since you object to cutting unnecessary expenditure on things like the WFA, you've learnt no lessons yet.

    The only way to cut taxes is to cut expenditure. On your own core voters as well as everyone else.
  • Ha

    It was always thus. Because government is merely the largest of organisations. So if you propose to change anything, a horde of people will have their rice bowl broken.

    Eliminate a report? - there’s a whole department that lives off that report. Feeds their children off it. Will retire from it.

    Which is why, if Starmer, say, turns his eye on the pace at which we can approve the construction of homes, a horde of skeletons will pop out of the ground and attack him. Just like in Jason and the Argonauts.

    Thatcher smashed a lot of rice bowls - some in surprising places. She changed *the culture* of the system.
    She also smashed rice bowls such as s culture of artistic and intellectual TV broadcasting, though.

    Ever the chemist rather than the philosopher.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    The fact you want to pamper your "core vote" with taxpayers money for no good reason other than they vote for you confirms you're not fit for office.
    The fact you want pensioners on £13 k a year to die of pneumonia this year confirms we don't need nor want your vote
  • HYUFD said:

    No I won't join Reform, I have always voted Conservative and to re elect Tory PMs and their governments at every general election since 18 unlike you and Bart.

    However it is also clear we cannot get a Conservative majority again without winning back some former Conservative voters now voting Reform. Otherwise at best the Tories could get a hung parliament and would have to form a government with Reform support or less likely now the LDs again
    I am quietly confident Kemi will win back some Reform voters,,but as important she needs to win back former conservatives voters like @BartholomewRoberts and others who you seem to want to judge and put off

    You are not a good advert for the party sadly
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    "The Right" has already lost its left flank to the Lib Dems and in some cases even to Labour. Lurching further rightwards and any remaining One Nation types will be saying goodbye to the Tories too.

    And as been said on here many, many times, not all ReFuk voters are Tories on a gap year. Many have never voted, and would never vote, Conservative.
    On the BMG Poll last week Conservatives + Reform on 46% combined are even bigger still than Labour + LDs on 41% combined.

    The vast majority of Reform voters would vote Tory over Labour or LD on a forced choice, the vast majority of 2024 Tories would vote Reform over Labour too even if a few voted LD over Reform
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,639
    Anyway, whatever happened to politics as showbusiness for ugly people. Kemi is clearly the best looking Tory leader of my lifetime. And probably, to be even-handed, ditto SKS, Labour.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,099

    We don't need your Woke takes, thanks.

    We've elected Kemi. Not a "black leader".

    This shit is (thankfully) on its way out and you need to wise up to it.
    That is indeed my point, if only you'd care to read my post properly.
  • HYUFD said:

    The fact you want pensioners on £13 k a year to die of pneumonia this year confirms we don't need nor want your vote
    Don't be pathetic.

    I don't want anyone on 13k a year, pensioner or baby or anyone else, to die from pneumonia.

    The most vulnerable to pneumonia are not the elderly, it's those under 1 year old. Yet they're not entitled to the WFA. Odd that isn't it?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585

    Wending my way back to Devon after a week in Turkmenistan and then a week in Abu Dhabi.

    Glad Kemi won. A lot of work to do to rise to the job. But I wish her the best in the role, for as long as she holds it. (Implying nothing other than she might upgrade her job to PM.)

    Still startling that 40% of the party couldn't see Jenrick for the sleazeball slimebag he clearly is.

    You have picked a tremendous leader, I suspect she will surprise on the upside, particularly bearing in mind how vile the alternative would have been.
  • Last two Tory leaders' first jobs:

    Waiter in Indian restaurant

    Server in McDonald's

    I don't know what Starmer or Corbyn did for their first jobs
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,786
    edited November 2024
    HYUFD said:

    The fact you want pensioners on £13 k a year to die of pneumonia this year confirms we don't need nor want your vote
    What a stupid comment

    Time for you to get a cuppa and a rich tea biscuit
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    HYUFD said:

    No I won't join Reform, I have always voted Conservative and to re elect Tory PMs and their governments at every general election since 18 unlike you and Bart.

    However it is also clear we cannot get a Conservative majority again without winning back some former Conservative voters now voting Reform. Otherwise at best the Tories could get a hung parliament and would have to form a government with Reform support or less likely now the LDs again
    "I have always voted Conservative"

    Except for when you voted Plaid Cymru to negate your Conservative vote.
  • There seem to be quite a disparate group of us on PB.com who voted Labour for the first time, or at least the first time in a long time, at the GE. The only thing that seems to unite us is the belief that the Tory government had completely jumped the shark, and the country couldn't move on until they were ejected from office. So perhaps something like,

    Starmer's Standards Stormtroopers

    It's particularly striking given that Labour's poll share at the GE was surprisingly low, that there were so many of us lending our vote to them last time.
    Last election was about kicking the tories in their face.

    It may well be the next election is about kicking labour in the face. Certainly my hope when doing the former was I'd subsequently be doing the latter.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    Last two Tory leaders' first jobs:

    Waiter in Indian restaurant

    Server in McDonald's

    I don't know what Starmer or Corbyn did for their first jobs

    Trade union lawyer and CND official, reporter and trade union official
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585


    This shit is (thankfully) on its way out and you need to wise up to it.
    That's no way to refer to Rishi! I thought he was a decent guy put into an impossible position by Johnson and Truss!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    I am quietly confident Kemi will win back some Reform voters,,but as important she needs to win back former conservatives voters like @BartholomewRoberts and others who you seem to want to judge and put off

    You are not a good advert for the party sadly
    Given a forced choice between Farage and Kemi almost all Reform voters would vote Farage, though she might be able to squeeze a few in seats Labour one last time where the Tories were second.

    Bart is a whinging narcissist who expects the Tories do do everything he demands or he throws his toys out the pram!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    Don't be pathetic.

    I don't want anyone on 13k a year, pensioner or baby or anyone else, to die from pneumonia.

    The most vulnerable to pneumonia are not the elderly, it's those under 1 year old. Yet they're not entitled to the WFA. Odd that isn't it?
    Even the minimum wage is higher than £13k a year now
  • HYUFD said:

    Given a forced choice between Farage and Kemi almost all Reform voters would vote Farage, though she might be able to squeeze a few in seats Labour one last time where the Tories were second.

    Bart is a whinging narcissist who expects the Tories do do everything he demands or he throws his toys out the pram!
    Again - you are not a good advert for the conservative party but thankfully you seem to be fairly unique
  • HYUFD said:

    Even the minimum wage is higher than £13k a year now
    Thanks, Rachel.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585

    I am quietly confident Kemi will win back some Reform voters,,but as important she needs to win back former conservatives voters like @BartholomewRoberts and others who you seem to want to judge and put off

    You are not a good advert for the party sadly
    I detect that HY is a little emotional after his guy got well and truly tonked! (Although not as well and truly tonked as he deserved).

    HY will come around, he always does.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,714
    On Badenoch. I've just read the 40-page Conservatism in Crisis essay linked to earlier. Based on its content, I'd argue that Badenoch is significantly to the right of current mainstream Tories (even of Jenrick, if one excludes his stuff on immigration). She could be a formidable opponent for Labour. The focus on the rise of the 'bureaucratic class' will be popular with those on here who bemoan the Blob or the NU10K or whatever.

    Much of the analysis is contentious, and there's little in the way of practical solutions yet. To give two examples. Firstly, it does, implicitly if not explicitly, seem to want to roll back many of the progressive (and consensual) measures of the last 60 years - indeed, it provides a voluminous list of such measures, slightly disapprovingly - for example, changes to family life and the role of women/feminism. Secondly, to destroy the 'bureaucratic class' entails reducing the role of the state significantly, but there's little to no indication of how this would be done.

    As a side note, she/it (the essay) argues strongly that the bureaucratic class and the left disapprove of the 'nation state' and seek to undermine it. I see no evidence of this from Starmer or others.

    Nevertheless, as a leftie I think she will be a much more formidable opponent than Jenrick or her recent predecessors. Whether she can formulate a coherent set of policies from her diagnosis of our current ills remains to be seen.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    I detect that HY is a little emotional after his guy got well and truly tonked! (Although not as well and truly tonked as he deserved).

    HY will come around, he always does.
    He wasn't that tonked, Jenrick still got a higher percentage of members votes than any losing Tory leadership candidate before
  • I detect that HY is a little emotional after his guy got well and truly tonked! (Although not as well and truly tonked as he deserved).

    HY will come around, he always does.
    Certainly he seems to be having an adverse reaction and I am not sure he will come round - time will tell
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    "I have always voted Conservative"

    Except for when you voted Plaid Cymru to negate your Conservative vote.
    I voted for every Tory candidate on that ballot paper, just there were only 4 Tory candidates in a Town council election for 6 seats and Plaid were the only other party standing so as I use every vote I have on principle I used my last 2 for them
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,917
    Just feeling sorry, more than anything, for the people on Twitter making fools of themselves over Kemi's election.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    HYUFD said:

    On the BMG Poll last week Conservatives + Reform on 46% combined are even bigger still than Labour + LDs on 41% combined.

    The vast majority of Reform voters would vote Tory over Labour or LD on a forced choice, the vast majority of 2024 Tories would vote Reform over Labour too even if a few voted LD over Reform
    1. Taking that nonsensical approach, you should add Green, SNP, PC, Workers Party, TUSC and pro-Palastine Independents to our side. But you can have Tommy Robinson and his mates.

    2. There isn't a forced choice. That would require us to use a system such as AV.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585
    Cookie said:

    Anyway, whatever happened to politics as showbusiness for ugly people. Kemi is clearly the best looking Tory leader of my lifetime. And probably, to be even-handed, ditto SKS, Labour.

    I'm sorry Cookie, whatever floats your boat. Starmer does nothing for me, he's all yours!

    Kemi on the other hand is a fine looking lady.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    1. Taking that nonsensical approach, you should add Green, SNP, PC, Workers Party, TUSC and pro-Palastine Independents to our side. But you can have Tommy Robinson and his mates.

    2. There isn't a forced choice. That would require us to use a system such as AV.
    If you think the Workers Party and TUSC and pro Palestine Independents would touch Starmer with a bargepole at the moment I have a bridge to sell you.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585
    HYUFD said:

    He wasn't that tonked, Jenrick still got a higher percentage of members votes than any losing Tory leadership candidate before
    Calm down dear!

    I did caveat my post, although when 52 plays 48 is claimed to be a comprehensive victory, in my book Jenrick was mullered.
  • HYUFD said:

    He wasn't that tonked, Jenrick still got a higher percentage of members votes than any losing Tory leadership candidate before
    It is academic - Kemi won and Jenrick lost - you need to accept it
  • HYUFD said:

    Given a forced choice between Farage and Kemi almost all Reform voters would vote Farage, though she might be able to squeeze a few in seats Labour one last time where the Tories were second.

    Bart is a whinging narcissist who expects the Tories do do everything he demands or he throws his toys out the pram!
    Don't be absurd, no party has ever done everything I demand and none ever will.

    But I will vote for my beliefs over my party. Unashamedly so too, anyone who votes party over principles does not have any of the latter.

    I believe in low taxes but to have low taxes you need to cut expenditure. Under Cameron and Osborne the Tories were the best party for that. Under Cameron and Osborne the Tories did many things I opposed but I happily voted for them as the best option available.

    Unfortunately now all unnecessary expenditure is going on your core vote and in recent years your party, my ex party, has decided to protect its core vote over cutting expenditure and thus taxes.

    Well I'm not voting for that.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    HYUFD said:

    He wasn't that tonked, Jenrick still got a higher percentage of members votes than any losing Tory leadership candidate before
    That's because the last two losers were perceived as more centrist. And the swivel eyed membership couldn't vote for someone of that persuasion to be their leader.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,476
    Andy_JS said:

    Just feeling sorry, more than anything, for the people on Twitter making fools of themselves over Kemi's election.

    Why?

    Twats gonna Twatter.

    https://youtu.be/d3Mrfut-FSw?si=9ow3m43ddCJuTZg4
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    There seem to be quite a disparate group of us on PB.com who voted Labour for the first time, or at least the first time in a long time, at the GE. The only thing that seems to unite us is the belief that the Tory government had completely jumped the shark, and the country couldn't move on until they were ejected from office. So perhaps something like,

    Starmer's Standards Stormtroopers

    It's particularly striking given that Labour's poll share at the GE was surprisingly low, that there were so many of us lending our vote to them last time.
    I thought you voted Green?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,563
    HYUFD said:

    I voted for every Tory candidate on that ballot paper, just there were only 4 Tory candidates in a Town council election for 6 seats and Plaid were the only other party standing so as I use every vote I have on principle I used my last 2 for them
    Isn't voting for another party grounds for expulsion from the Conservatives? It is with Labour. (If you get found out.)
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,766
    edited November 2024
    HYUFD said:

    Even the minimum wage is higher than £13k a year now
    The equivalent Universal Credit allowance for someone with no kids and no housing costs is £4,720 per annum. You don't get it at all if you have savings over £16,000, and anything over £6,000 is tapered away.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,786
    edited November 2024

    Don't be absurd, no party has ever done everything I demand and none ever will.

    But I will vote for my beliefs over my party. Unashamedly so too, anyone who votes party over principles does not have any of the latter.

    I believe in low taxes but to have low taxes you need to cut expenditure. Under Cameron and Osborne the Tories were the best party for that. Under Cameron and Osborne the Tories did many things I opposed but I happily voted for them as the best option available.

    Unfortunately now all unnecessary expenditure is going on your core vote and in recent years your party, my ex party, has decided to protect its core vote over cutting expenditure and thus taxes.

    Well I'm not voting for that.
    I genuinely hope Kemi will change the narrative from the core pensioner vote, and address the younger vote including housing and show a pathway to lower taxes on people and businesses to get the real growth the country needs

    She is only 44 herself which is considerably younger than my three children
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,559
    Jonathan said:

    Eh? The gap is less than 10%, which is mind blowing. The Reform seats are irrelevant, it’s the seats they denied the Tories (and might continue to deny the Tories) that matter. I would say that the Tories only won 120 seats might bother them strategically.
    Was.

    At the Tories' lowest ebb.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,448

    On Badenoch. I've just read the 40-page Conservatism in Crisis essay linked to earlier. Based on its content, I'd argue that Badenoch is significantly to the right of current mainstream Tories (even of Jenrick, if one excludes his stuff on immigration). She could be a formidable opponent for Labour. The focus on the rise of the 'bureaucratic class' will be popular with those on here who bemoan the Blob or the NU10K or whatever.

    Much of the analysis is contentious, and there's little in the way of practical solutions yet. To give two examples. Firstly, it does, implicitly if not explicitly, seem to want to roll back many of the progressive (and consensual) measures of the last 60 years - indeed, it provides a voluminous list of such measures, slightly disapprovingly - for example, changes to family life and the role of women/feminism. Secondly, to destroy the 'bureaucratic class' entails reducing the role of the state significantly, but there's little to no indication of how this would be done.

    As a side note, she/it (the essay) argues strongly that the bureaucratic class and the left disapprove of the 'nation state' and seek to undermine it. I see no evidence of this from Starmer or others.

    Nevertheless, as a leftie I think she will be a much more formidable opponent than Jenrick or her recent predecessors. Whether she can formulate a coherent set of policies from her diagnosis of our current ills remains to be seen.

    I think there is a possible political space for a low tax small government party, though tough spending cuts would have to include state pensions and the NHS to balance the books. That might play well in Tufton St, but unlikely to do so in core Tory voter demographics. Just look at the extreme reaction to cutting WFP for an example.

    It might even be a package that could appeal to sound money centrists like me, though I would also expect small government to include butting out of the lives of Trans people etc, in the words of Coach Walz "mind your own damn business".
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,099
    HYUFD said:

    Even the minimum wage is higher than £13k a year now
    UC single person allowance is £4.4k pa.

    UC single person looking after two children = £10.2k pa. That's three people living off just over £10k
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    I detect that HY is a little emotional after his guy got well and truly tonked! (Although not as well and truly tonked as he deserved).

    HY will come around, he always does.
    HYUFD
  • I genuinely hope Kemi will change the narrative from the core pensioner vote, and address the younger vote including housing and show a pathway to lower taxes on people and businesses to get the real growth the country needs

    She is only 44 herself which is considerably younger than my three children
    Me too.

    If she does, she'll get my vote back.
  • While I agree with those saying that Kemi's race and sex are irrelevant; we just wanted the best potential leader

    I also think it's good that we can set an example in showing that race and sex don't matter

    And it's good because it'll make some Lab MPs squirm
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    UC single person allowance is £4.4k pa.

    UC single person looking after two children = £10.2k pa. That's three people living off just over £10k
    Child benefit is also £26 a week and the vast majority of children will be less at risk of pneumonia regardless of parental income than an 80 or 90 year old on £13k a year with no winter fuel allowance now
  • HYUFD said:

    Child benefit is also £26 a week and the vast majority of children will be less at risk of pneumonia regardless of parental income than an 80 or 90 year old on £13k a year with no winter fuel allowance now
    Infants under one are at a higher risk of pneumonia than adults of any age.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292
    edited November 2024

    Isn't voting for another party grounds for expulsion from the Conservatives? It is with Labour. (If you get found out.)
    No otherwise you would have to have expelled half the Tory membership who voted for Farage in European Parliament elections (and of course I voted for all Tory candidates in that election anyway).

    Campaigning or open support for another party ahead of the Tory party is but that is not the same.

    Ironically of course Bart also voted for Farage in the 2019 European elections while I still voted for May's Tories making his current attacks on me as a so called far rightwinger particularly repulsive
  • Infants under one are at a higher risk of pneumonia than adults of any age.
    All pensioners get an annual flu jab and the poorest pensioners will receive the WFP
  • While I agree with those saying that Kemi's race and sex are irrelevant; we just wanted the best potential leader

    I also think it's good that we can set an example in showing that race and sex don't matter

    And it's good because it'll make some Lab MPs squirm

    As I alluded in the postscript I also expect some on the non Tory right to expose themselves as idiots because of Badenoch's race and background.

    I've experienced this first hand because I'm either superficially brown or an invader.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585
    HYUFD said:

    Given a forced choice between Farage and Kemi almost all Reform voters would vote Farage, though she might be able to squeeze a few in seats Labour one last time where the Tories were second.

    Bart is a whinging narcissist who expects the Tories do do everything he demands or he throws his toys out the pram!
    You don't need to be looking at the racist underbelly for your win. Farage will out-fash Jenrick 8 days a week.

    You need to be attracting people like me to your party. Well, not me, but people like me. I am unlikely to ever vote Conservative granted, but I can assure you I will never ever vote for Farage, Jenrick or your hero Johnson to be Prime Minister.

    Your party has had a good day today. You should accept that and move forward.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,448
    edited November 2024
    HYUFD said:

    Trade union lawyer and CND official, reporter and trade union official
    No, Starmers first job was selling ice creams on beaches

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/23/keir-starmer-caught-illegally-selling-ice-creams-french-riviera?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

    Corbyns first job was a local newspaper reporter, then a VSO worker in Jamaica, doing youth work and teaching geography.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,292

    That's because the last two losers were perceived as more centrist. And the swivel eyed membership couldn't vote for someone of that persuasion to be their leader.
    They voted for centrist Cameron to be leader in 2005
  • OK. Now that's over can we get back to the US Presidential?

    So you don't want me to publish my thread on AV tomorrow and a thread on Scottish independence on Monday?
  • All pensioners get an annual flu jab and the poorest pensioners will receive the WFP
    Quite reasonable that. No objections to that.

    Children get vaccines too. Quite reasonable too.

    Nobody should be denied what is needed, particularly vaccines, but spending money on people purely because they are "core vote" is no way to spend taxpayers money.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,399
    On F1 if qualifying doesn’t take place tomorrow morning the results of the first practice will be used to set the starting grid for the race.

    That would mean Lando in starting first and Max in last place
  • Labour’s support in Scotland has plunged in the wake of Rachel Reeves’s budget, which voters believe will hit them in their pockets and damage the country, a new poll has found.

    Backing for Anas Sarwar’s party has dropped to such an extent that it would be virtually impossible for him to form a Scottish government if the results were replicated at the Holyrood 2026 election.

    The poll by Norstat, the first conducted in Scotland since the chancellor unveiled her tax and spending plans, suggested that while voters felt warmly about the budget’s main policies, they felt that they would lose out overall.

    The research put support for Labour in Scottish parliamentary constituencies at 23 per cent, a drop of seven points since the last survey in August and the lowest since Nicola Sturgeon quit as first minister last March. Backing for Scottish Labour on the more proportional regional list fell by six points to 22 per cent.

    Analysis by Sir John Curtice, the polling expert and professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde, found this would leave Labour with 29 MSPs, an increase of seven on its current level.

    The SNP has failed to capitalise on Labour’s woes — remaining unchanged on 33 per cent for constituency votes and increasing backing by only one point to 29 per cent on the regional list — but its projected return of 51 MSPs would almost certainly see John Swinney remain first minister despite losing 13 seats compared with the 2021 election.


    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotland/article/scottish-labour-popularity-poll-rachel-reeves-budget-2024-5jmhqwjkr
  • So you don't want me to publish my thread on AV tomorrow and a thread on Scottish independence on Monday?
    BORING! :lol:
  • eekeek Posts: 29,399

    Quite reasonable that. No objections to that.

    Children get vaccines too. Quite reasonable too.

    Nobody should be denied what is needed, particularly vaccines, but spending money on people purely because they are "core vote" is no way to spend taxpayers money.
    Children won’t be getting vaccines in the US if Trump wins - RFK believes vaccines cause autism
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,476

    As I alluded in the postscript I also expect some on the non Tory right to expose themselves as idiots because of Badenoch's race and background.

    I've experienced this first hand because I'm either superficially brown or an invader.
    I thought you were an extortionately modest invader of deleted-deleted-deleted

    ?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 25,752

    On Badenoch. I've just read the 40-page Conservatism in Crisis essay linked to earlier. Based on its content, I'd argue that Badenoch is significantly to the right of current mainstream Tories (even of Jenrick, if one excludes his stuff on immigration). She could be a formidable opponent for Labour. The focus on the rise of the 'bureaucratic class' will be popular with those on here who bemoan the Blob or the NU10K or whatever.

    Much of the analysis is contentious, and there's little in the way of practical solutions yet. To give two examples. Firstly, it does, implicitly if not explicitly, seem to want to roll back many of the progressive (and consensual) measures of the last 60 years - indeed, it provides a voluminous list of such measures, slightly disapprovingly - for example, changes to family life and the role of women/feminism. Secondly, to destroy the 'bureaucratic class' entails reducing the role of the state significantly, but there's little to no indication of how this would be done.

    As a side note, she/it (the essay) argues strongly that the bureaucratic class and the left disapprove of the 'nation state' and seek to undermine it. I see no evidence of this from Starmer or others.

    Nevertheless, as a leftie I think she will be a much more formidable opponent than Jenrick or her recent predecessors. Whether she can formulate a coherent set of policies from her diagnosis of our current ills remains to be seen.

    How does this compare with National Conservative ideas?

  • eek said:

    On F1 if qualifying doesn’t take place tomorrow morning the results of the first practice will be used to set the starting grid for the race.

    That would mean Lando in starting first and Max in last place

    Oh no.

    I think I might damage a rib laughing if that happens.
  • BlancheLivermoreBlancheLivermore Posts: 6,180
    edited November 2024

    As I alluded in the postscript I also expect some on the non Tory right to expose themselves as idiots because of Badenoch's race and background.

    I've experienced this first hand because I'm either superficially brown or an invader.
    People who prejudge others by their skin colour or their name should have no place in the Conservative Party

    Religion is trickier

    If someone tells me that they're Christian and that God is good, then they should probably be allowed in the Conservative Party, but I would prejudge them
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 30,585

    While I agree with those saying that Kemi's race and sex are irrelevant; we just wanted the best potential leader

    I also think it's good that we can set an example in showing that race and sex don't matter

    And it's good because it'll make some Lab MPs squirm

    Good post Blanche and then it all went haywire with your last sentence.Dawn Butler etc. excepted.

    Oh well.

    What a stupid comment

    Time for you to get a cuppa and a rich tea biscuit
    Whatever you do don't give him one of those revolutionary republican Garibaldi biscuits.
This discussion has been closed.