Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Let’s talk about gender politics – politicalbetting.com

13567

Comments

  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    What we need is to have several publicly funded large outfits whose task is to investigate possible large scale crimes being committed in the public gaze, close down the operations, charge and prosecute them and if convicted incarcerate them for long periods....
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    Last time we tried that everybody stuck their fingers in their ears and told us to suck it up.
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,335
    Nigelb said:

    .

    kle4 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Tankie was the cognomen given to those that stayed in the CPGB after the CPGB/NCP split in 1968 - not to be confused with the CPGB/CPB(M-L) split in 1963.

    It's used on here with intellectual dishonesty, or perhaps more likely dunderheaded ignorance, to refer to any person with a left wing perspective for whom the Centrist Dad posting has little regard.

    Oh boo hoo. Suddenly name calling is unfair Dura? This is the line, this is where historically accurate terminology must be maintained for you, the radical bad boy of PB, that is where things get too mean?

    And you call that intellectually dishonest? Has the term ever been used on here outside the context of Russia/Ukraine, instead to apply to any left wing perspective?

    As someone who delights in provocation it's good to know some things are still beyond the pale for you - inaccurate referencing of 1960s Communists. Even if it is very out of character for you to be so snowflakey.

    Presumably you detest the term Tory, which is supposed to refer to outlaws, typically Irish, yet some buggers, probably centrist dads, use it dishonestly about modern politicians.

    Terms never evolve after all.
    Perhaps Dura is just deprecating lazy invective. He does have high standards, and great fluency in that respect.

    Though TBF tankie is quite useful to denote those committed to ideology impervious to any challenge.
    It certainly riles up the soi-disant “radicals” on the left who turn out to be in it purely because it gives them an endless supply of opportunities for bootlicking.

    But the meaning is not so much about being impervious to challenge as rather that the target is nothing more than an authoritarian follower who is lost without someone to tell them what to think & will justify almost any atrocity if it preserves the authoritarian hierarchy they cling to for meaning in this uncertain world.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,947
    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    Is the wedding in Paris? I'm in the South at the moment and it seems to be the fashion for English people to get married here. The whole kit and caboodle arrives. AnywaI hope he's chosen wisely and enjoy the wedding! PS I'd go with Edinburgh as my favourite British City
    The wedding is just south of Versailles
    In a chateau
    Which her dad owns.
    He's the conte. ( not easy to say with an Ulster accent )
    I couldn't resist. (An early Alan Parker)

    https://fr.video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-domaindev-st_emea&ei=UTF-8&hsimp=yhs-st_emea&hspart=domaindev&p=Parker+pen+ad+with+penelope+keith&type=dhm_A0JQ1_set_bfr__alt__ddc_srch_searchpulse_net#id=1&vid=3a288a0ebe2e992b8a134f578e79691b&action=view
    LOL I remember that !
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    Yes beause that worked oh so well before..... oh.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,177
    Pulpstar said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cll476qzm85o

    Has anyone in the civil service ever studied operational research ?

    I appreciate PPE procurement for a pandemic isn't what you'll normally expect in your job but some idea of throughput and ability of the system to utilise PPE might have been a good idea.

    Given the enormous amount of functional PPE from an apparently reputable supplier that they've just destroyed, what were all the dodgy contacts about ?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    Trentham Gardens - worth the trip.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,058

    Funny anecdote.

    Robert Jenrick is criticising the Labour candidate for Newark for having been 'parachuted in' all the way from Nottingham. He is blocking loads of people for having the temerity to ask where he lives and particularly where he lived before he was chosen as a candidate for Newark? The answer of course is Herefordshire where he has a stately pile. Or is it London where he owns two further town houses? And all the time the taxpayer is paying £2K a month for him to rent a property in Newark.

    Glasshouses and fecking great rocks spring to mind.

    I hope I’m up for Jenrick! He’s an odious creature.
  • Breaking news. Someone has thrown a 99 with extra chocolate sauce on Farage in Uxbridge. He needs some new Pr now as things have gone a bit quiet. Not really by the way.
  • FeersumEnjineeyaFeersumEnjineeya Posts: 4,489
    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The obvious way to deal with irregular immigration is to process the would-be immigrants' claims efficiently, and then quickly deport those who are deemed not eligible to stay. The returns deal on Albanian migrants successfully reduced Channel crossings from 45,774 in 2022 to 29,437 in 2023. Why can this not be replicated with other nations?

    https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/channel-crossings-tracker
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,108
    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The French kicked an Imam all the way to Morocco for making some Alan's Snackbar comments. Been in France for x decades. Punting him there was illegal, apparently. "Je suis desolate"* was the response from the French government to that.

    *Roughly translated - "Oh Dear, Never Mind, How Sad."
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.

    Kids say it.

    Mine don't, and I have two.

    The ones in Sidmouth are usually full of kids over from the beach to spend their pocket money.

  • Close the channel.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,568
    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
  • Put a wall around the whole of the UK coast. The Americans will do it for us.
  • Farooq said:

    Breaking news. Someone has thrown a 99 with extra chocolate sauce on Farage in Uxbridge. He needs some new Pr now as things have gone a bit quiet. Not really by the way.

    If we're talking ice-cream van fare, I've narrowed down what you are to three choices: a flake, a screwball, or a rocket.
    Rocket.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,121
    Deal for Assange. Way way past time.

    Nice one Biden.

  • VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,549
    Heathener said:

    IanB2 said:

    Heathener said:

    Beginning to wonder if Newton Abbot could be a 4-way marginal?!

    Am I right /wrong?

    Is there another in the country that could lay claim to that?

    My own seat could.

    But probably, neither of them will. It’s just that we’re unable to discern how the chips are falling, given the shortage of data to work on. Don’t discount the data you do have, however.
    I agree with you Ian. Can you remind me which one is yours?

    As @Taz and I discussed, I think Newton Abbot will be a Cons HOLD but it’s a very confusing picture at the moment. 3 different tactical voting sites all have different answers (1 = LibDem; 1 = Labour; 1 = Unsure).

    The MRPs also presented a conflicted and conflicting picture.

    (Does anyone have a constituency link for Focaldata?)

    Survation: Labour GAIN
    IPSOS-MORI: Leaning Con: Con 36% Lab 29% LibDem 19%, Reform 12%
    MiC: Con HOLD: Con 36%, Lab 21%, LibDem 30%, Reform 9%
    Savanta: Too Close to Call: Con-Lab battle
    YouGov: Con HOLD: Con 29%, Lab 16%, LibDem 23%, Reform 23%
    Focaldata blog https://www.focaldata.com/blog/focaldata-prolific-uk-general-election-mrp
    Spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G7Ey3ZcEMWbosicrLKtp6LqiCh2KUUBc/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101474024138217768042&rtpof=true&sd=true

    319
    E14001381 Newton Abbot c on 29.2% lab 23.9% LD 20.3% ref 20.4% 5.2%
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,971
    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    A little counter-intuitive. Could it be the dazzling football...the 75% Leave vote....the bottlenecks on the M6.....the infamous wet Wednesday evenings or just that ten miles and you're into Wales?
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,593
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    I passed one at the weekend, a customer was getting the "flames in the earhole" treatment.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,121

    Funny anecdote.

    Robert Jenrick is criticising the Labour candidate for Newark for having been 'parachuted in' all the way from Nottingham. He is blocking loads of people for having the temerity to ask where he lives and particularly where he lived before he was chosen as a candidate for Newark? The answer of course is Herefordshire where he has a stately pile. Or is it London where he owns two further town houses? And all the time the taxpayer is paying £2K a month for him to rent a property in Newark.

    Glasshouses and fecking great rocks spring to mind.

    I hope I’m up for Jenrick! He’s an odious creature.
    Definitely on my 'portillo moment' list for the big night.
  • Stoke. Pottery town.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,108
    Phil said:

    Nigelb said:

    .

    kle4 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Tankie was the cognomen given to those that stayed in the CPGB after the CPGB/NCP split in 1968 - not to be confused with the CPGB/CPB(M-L) split in 1963.

    It's used on here with intellectual dishonesty, or perhaps more likely dunderheaded ignorance, to refer to any person with a left wing perspective for whom the Centrist Dad posting has little regard.

    Oh boo hoo. Suddenly name calling is unfair Dura? This is the line, this is where historically accurate terminology must be maintained for you, the radical bad boy of PB, that is where things get too mean?

    And you call that intellectually dishonest? Has the term ever been used on here outside the context of Russia/Ukraine, instead to apply to any left wing perspective?

    As someone who delights in provocation it's good to know some things are still beyond the pale for you - inaccurate referencing of 1960s Communists. Even if it is very out of character for you to be so snowflakey.

    Presumably you detest the term Tory, which is supposed to refer to outlaws, typically Irish, yet some buggers, probably centrist dads, use it dishonestly about modern politicians.

    Terms never evolve after all.
    Perhaps Dura is just deprecating lazy invective. He does have high standards, and great fluency in that respect.

    Though TBF tankie is quite useful to denote those committed to ideology impervious to any challenge.
    It certainly riles up the soi-disant “radicals” on the left who turn out to be in it purely because it gives them an endless supply of opportunities for bootlicking.

    But the meaning is not so much about being impervious to challenge as rather that the target is nothing more than an authoritarian follower who is lost without someone to tell them what to think & will justify almost any atrocity if it preserves the authoritarian hierarchy they cling to for meaning in this uncertain world.
    Tankie is used here to refer to the people who are instinctively pro-Russian (or pro any anti-western nation with totalitarian aspirations), despite often claiming to be Trots etc.

    It is interesting how self described left anarchists have shibboleths. And a remarkable amount of sneaking affection for empires. Of the right kind.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861
    edited June 25

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The obvious way to deal with irregular immigration is to process the would-be immigrants' claims efficiently, and then quickly deport those who are deemed not eligible to stay. The returns deal on Albanian migrants successfully reduced Channel crossings from 45,774 in 2022 to 29,437 in 2023. Why can this not be replicated with other nations?

    https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/channel-crossings-tracker
    Because like a couple of billion people on this planet under international treaty they have a right to refugee status if they claim it, and we bind ourselves to those treaties. Albanians are not generally refugees.

    There are only two (interlocked) decent solutions:

    1) Give the UN the job of ensuring that governance in each of its member states conforms with the standards implied by the treaties

    2) Give the UN the task of overseeing 100% of refugees offering absolutely equal but minimal rights to all wherever in the world they are. (Nutrition, a tent, primary education, basic healthcare, ticket home once (1) is accomplished.)
  • johntjohnt Posts: 166

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The French kicked an Imam all the way to Morocco for making some Alan's Snackbar comments. Been in France for x decades. Punting him there was illegal, apparently. "Je suis desolate"* was the response from the French government to that.

    *Roughly translated - "Oh Dear, Never Mind, How Sad."
    Thanks for the patronising guff, but that is not an answer my question.
    I presume you have resorted to the patronising approach as the answer is unpalatable? Oh Dear, never mind, how sad.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,947

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,568
    So Le Palais in Belle Ile is yet ANOTHER lovely French small town. With a magnificent Vauban citadel

    That said I’ve been doing some research and discovered that - contra my instincts - Brittany is not poor. It is one of the richest regions of France. And the favoured coasts and islands are seriously rich - partly due to the influx of wealthy Parisians and other domestic tourists

    Hence the gorgeous roundabouts
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 976

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    I passed one at the weekend, a customer was getting the "flames in the earhole" treatment.
    Turkish barbers aren't money laundering.
    The young men if today just get way more treatment such as perms etc. They spend more money on their looks than before.
    (Also there are many more people)
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,034
    Heathener said:

    IanB2 said:

    Heathener said:

    Beginning to wonder if Newton Abbot could be a 4-way marginal?!

    Am I right /wrong?

    Is there another in the country that could lay claim to that?

    My own seat could.

    But probably, neither of them will. It’s just that we’re unable to discern how the chips are falling, given the shortage of data to work on. Don’t discount the data you do have, however.
    I agree with you Ian. Can you remind me which one is yours?

    As @Taz and I discussed, I think Newton Abbot will be a Cons HOLD but it’s a very confusing picture at the moment. 3 different tactical voting sites all have different answers (1 = LibDem; 1 = Labour; 1 = Unsure).

    The MRPs also presented a conflicted and conflicting picture.

    (Does anyone have a constituency link for Focaldata?)

    Survation: Labour GAIN
    IPSOS-MORI: Leaning Con: Con 36% Lab 29% LibDem 19%, Reform 12%
    MiC: Con HOLD: Con 36%, Lab 21%, LibDem 30%, Reform 9%
    Savanta: Too Close to Call: Con-Lab battle
    YouGov: Con HOLD: Con 29%, Lab 16%, LibDem 23%, Reform 23%
    It's here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G7Ey3ZcEMWbosicrLKtp6LqiCh2KUUBc/edit?gid=491918608#gid=491918608

    It has:

    Con 29.2, Lab 23.9, LD 20.3, Reform 20.4, Green 5.2

    You may well be right.

    The aggregation site (which also includes non-MRP predictions from Britain Predicts, the Economist, and the FT, is here: https://inglesp.github.io/apogee/constituencies/E14001381/

    Using an average from the seven MRPs (Electoral Calculus, Focaldata, Savanta, Survation, More In Common, Ipsos, YouGov) gives:
    Con 30, Lab 24, LD 25, Reform 16
    (But Reform rising over time as Con subsides a little)
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,124
    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    Well there there... meanwhile the rest of humanity thinks the City of Light is clearly preferable to a run down, post industrial conglomeration with significant social problems. 😏
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Cicero said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    Well there there... meanwhile the rest of humanity thinks the City of Light is clearly preferable to a run down, post industrial conglomeration with significant social problems. 😏
    Glasgow ?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    Cicero said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    Well there there... meanwhile the rest of humanity thinks the City of Light is clearly preferable to a run down, post industrial conglomeration with significant social problems. 😏
    Due to my location - City of Light to me means Sunderland and that is a a run down, post industrial conglomeration with significant social problems - better known to those slightly further north as the City of Shite.

  • London. Anywhere by the river is fine.
  • CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 489
    Just look at the blue angular, masculine arrow design of the reform logo... obviously made by men, for men.

    "This paper examines how a critical dimension of logo design, namely naturalness, along with logo color, influences brand gender perceptions, and whether brand-design-induced gender perceptions ultimately impact affective reactions to logos."

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41262-020-00216-4

    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJM-08-2012-0456/full/html

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mar.20701

    Does it lool welcoming to women? 9 people in the front lineup.... one is a woman:

    https://onthewight.com/wp-content/2024/05/Attendees-at-the-Reform-UK-meeting-with-Richard-Tice.jpg

    zero women:

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ7KXj_es3nKaU8-uhZ_l4SQIMfxHB1pD1NTpdIx3a1Ql0qPMvpHyNLPRKWTcRQD4wAEOw&usqp=CAU

    The internet is full of pictures like this: a reform candidate surrounded by angry grey haired men.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586

    Cicero said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    I prefer Stoke-on-Trent.
    Well there there... meanwhile the rest of humanity thinks the City of Light is clearly preferable to a run down, post industrial conglomeration with significant social problems. 😏
    Glasgow ?
    Both Glasgow and Edinburgh show that the early 21st century approach of retail as the "fix" for city centre problems has definitely finished.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 976
    Can AI steal your vote? Dispatched channel 4.

    Interesting experiment by Channel 4 to see if people change their minds based on fake AI. This should be bugger news
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,942
    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
    Don't you have a contradiction there. You say hundreds drown already. You also say they will stop coming if we tow them back so the extra risk of drowning will in the end save lives as it will stop them coming.

    Why will it stop them coming if they risk drowning already? They will still come in a hope of not being caught.

    Re you last sentence that is a genuine worry I agree.
  • Reform should change their name to the I want to end it party.
  • Unhappy lot.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366
    Good morning everyone.

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    Can that wait until after I've taken the kids to Disneyland there?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861
    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
  • Good morning everyone.

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    Can that wait until after I've taken the kids to Disneyland there?
    What went wrong in Paris,?
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 976
    Women also twice as likely to say don't know.
    Hmm.
    I understand that women are naturally more indecisive but could there be a shy reform factor in there?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,121

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    @Leon reports that they already have.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Taz said:

    Taz said:

    A very mature and good response from Wes Streeting on the trans issue I thought.

    I do think Labour will put the culture wars to one side, which can only be a good thing.

    I wonder if he will support these women who have been abandoned by their own union, forced to change in front of a man.

    https://x.com/treesey/status/1805219358676812103?s=61
    Morning. Just out of interest who are you voting for?

    I’ve already voted Labour for transparency.
    Morning

    I have said I would not vote. Especially as Labour just parachuted a candidate in here and took the areas for granted.

    However I have quite liked Luke Akehurst's twitter campaign and his campaign stops as well as his attempts to eat his way around North Durham including a few places I have eaten, so I may well end up voting labour after all for the 10th consecutive election
    Respect your choice to not vote but also to vote for Akehurst if you like what he's doing.

    I wish I had abstained in 2019.
    I did. Best vote I never cast.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.

    Kids say it.

    Mine don't, and I have two.
    That settles the debate then.
  • After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    @Leon reports that they already have.
    Who did it?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792
    Nine days to go. (Or about a fortnight if you are LauraK/BigG)
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,951

    Good morning everyone.

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    Can that wait until after I've taken the kids to Disneyland there?
    Europe's biggest LTN
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,108
    johnt said:

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The French kicked an Imam all the way to Morocco for making some Alan's Snackbar comments. Been in France for x decades. Punting him there was illegal, apparently. "Je suis desolate"* was the response from the French government to that.

    *Roughly translated - "Oh Dear, Never Mind, How Sad."
    Thanks for the patronising guff, but that is not an answer my question.
    I presume you have resorted to the patronising approach as the answer is unpalatable? Oh Dear, never mind, how sad.
    The point was that the French State simply break the law when there is conflict between what the government wants to do and the law.

    Now whether you want a governmental system that throws human rights under the bus when a problem arises is another story.

    Think of the Greek coastguard killing hundreds, while trying to tow a migrant boat. Horrible and stupid.

    In many ways we should be proud that the response to the boat people has been to fish them out of the water, give them Domino’s pizza and block book the kind of medium quality country hotels that have the ski machines next to the swimming pool.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
    If you've never felt emotionally moved in Hyde Park or Kensington Gardens on a warm summer evening you were probably being driven through in an ambulance. Ditto Waterlow and Greenwich Parks.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 23,145
    algarkirk said:

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The obvious way to deal with irregular immigration is to process the would-be immigrants' claims efficiently, and then quickly deport those who are deemed not eligible to stay. The returns deal on Albanian migrants successfully reduced Channel crossings from 45,774 in 2022 to 29,437 in 2023. Why can this not be replicated with other nations?

    https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/channel-crossings-tracker
    Because like a couple of billion people on this planet under international treaty they have a right to refugee status if they claim it, and we bind ourselves to those treaties. Albanians are not generally refugees.

    There are only two (interlocked) decent solutions:

    1) Give the UN the job of ensuring that governance in each of its member states conforms with the standards implied by the treaties

    2) Give the UN the task of overseeing 100% of refugees offering absolutely equal but minimal rights to all wherever in the world they are. (Nutrition, a tent, primary education, basic healthcare, ticket home once (1) is accomplished.)
    For these to be solutions please explain how you will convince countries such as the USA, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia to accept the UN deciding how many asylum seekers they get, let alone countries such as our own.

    Otherwise it is just another sensible and good but not happening wish list.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    edited June 25
    Typical anti-Labour Telegraph story this morning

    Migrants in France ‘waiting for Labour government’

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/24/migrants-labour-government-crossing-channel-rwanda/

    They may be but equally even with Rwanda more people have arrived between 1st Jan and 23rd June than in the first 6 months of 2022 or 2023.

    and we still have another week of excellent sailing weather.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    Nunu5 said:

    Can AI steal your vote? Dispatched channel 4.

    Interesting experiment by Channel 4 to see if people change their minds based on fake AI. This should be bugger news

    I'm sure they can be made to change their minds based on AI-generated fakes but they'll also change their minds based on dodgy edits and outright easily-detectable lies like putting a caption over somebody saying something that isn't what they said.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    There are some quite good Turkish barbers which makes me doubt the money laundering angle. American Candy on the other hand...I used to look at the vast number of empty Angus/Aberdeen Steak houses in prime London Locations and think the same thing though - so who knows.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861
    DougSeal said:

    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
    If you've never felt emotionally moved in Hyde Park or Kensington Gardens on a warm summer evening you were probably being driven through in an ambulance. Ditto Waterlow and Greenwich Parks.
    Yes. Fair points. I was exaggerating, and too much. However there is much squalor, and too much casual ugliness.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.

    Kids say it.

    Mine don't, and I have two.
    I have two too, and mine say it.

    I won't let them go too often due to the amount of sugar, but they are allowed to go from time to time as a treat.

    And my wife likes it too, as she finds products there that remind her of home (South Africa). Some of the stuff available in those stores are stuff she had growing up, which you don't get in stores here so it's not just kids and American emigres who like it either.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 976
    Nunu5 said:

    Can AI steal your vote? Dispatched channel 4.

    Interesting experiment by Channel 4 to see if people change their minds based on fake AI. This should be bugger news

    That should be bigger news......not bugger news ......
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708

    Deal for Assange. Way way past time.

    Nice one Biden.

    Also good job by the Australians making this happen.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    Gareth Jenkins today starts the first of 4 days of evidence at the post office enquiry.

    Going to be interesting to see how much blame he can pin on others to protect himself from perjury charges...
  • The_WoodpeckerThe_Woodpecker Posts: 460

    johnt said:

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The French kicked an Imam all the way to Morocco for making some Alan's Snackbar comments. Been in France for x decades. Punting him there was illegal, apparently. "Je suis desolate"* was the response from the French government to that.

    *Roughly translated - "Oh Dear, Never Mind, How Sad."
    Thanks for the patronising guff, but that is not an answer my question.
    I presume you have resorted to the patronising approach as the answer is unpalatable? Oh Dear, never mind, how sad.
    The point was that the French State simply break the law when there is conflict between what the government wants to do and the law.

    Now whether you want a governmental system that throws human rights under the bus when a problem arises is another story.

    Think of the Greek coastguard killing hundreds, while trying to tow a migrant boat. Horrible and stupid.

    In many ways we should be proud that the response to the boat people has been to fish them out of the water, give them Domino’s pizza and block book the kind of medium quality country hotels that have the ski machines next to the swimming pool.
    You have clearly never set foot inside the Burstin "Hotel", Folkestone.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366
    Eabhal said:

    Good morning everyone.

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    Can that wait until after I've taken the kids to Disneyland there?
    Europe's biggest LTN
    With ample parking too I believe.

    We're looking at booking a lodge to stay there next year. Package comes with free parking included both at the lodge and at the park for an easy journey between the two. 😀
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861

    algarkirk said:

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The obvious way to deal with irregular immigration is to process the would-be immigrants' claims efficiently, and then quickly deport those who are deemed not eligible to stay. The returns deal on Albanian migrants successfully reduced Channel crossings from 45,774 in 2022 to 29,437 in 2023. Why can this not be replicated with other nations?

    https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/channel-crossings-tracker
    Because like a couple of billion people on this planet under international treaty they have a right to refugee status if they claim it, and we bind ourselves to those treaties. Albanians are not generally refugees.

    There are only two (interlocked) decent solutions:

    1) Give the UN the job of ensuring that governance in each of its member states conforms with the standards implied by the treaties

    2) Give the UN the task of overseeing 100% of refugees offering absolutely equal but minimal rights to all wherever in the world they are. (Nutrition, a tent, primary education, basic healthcare, ticket home once (1) is accomplished.)
    For these to be solutions please explain how you will convince countries such as the USA, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia to accept the UN deciding how many asylum seekers they get, let alone countries such as our own.

    Otherwise it is just another sensible and good but not happening wish list.
    Agree. But until something like this is in place I don't think there are any other solutions. Two issues. It is hypocrisy for UN member states to be routinely run in such a way that other member states have to accept their refugee's status. Secondly, because of the scale of legitimate claims, there has to be a (horrible) complete separation of refugee status from economic advantage.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,789
    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures. Last week I went to the Eras tour on one night and Opera Holland Park for Tosca another, from the wondrous and free treasure of the National Gallery to erotic gay porn at Studio Voltaire in Clapham. From the high priestess of feminist art Judy Chicago at the Serpentine, to Cézanne at the Courthauld. It’s endless and magnificent.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    You might be able to but how many people do so ?

    The average Londoner visits one of the museums about once or twice a year:

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/630146/leading-london-visitor-attractions-uk/

    Perhaps the attractions of London are wasted on the people who live there.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,880
    Women tend to vote for liberal and centrist parties more than men. Men tend to vote more for hard right nationalist parties than women. In the US women are less likely to vote for Trump than men too.

    Of course pre Blair women also voted Tory largely while men mostly voted Labour, especially working class men
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    edited June 25

    Eabhal said:

    Good morning everyone.

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    Can that wait until after I've taken the kids to Disneyland there?
    Europe's biggest LTN
    With ample parking too I believe.

    We're looking at booking a lodge to stay there next year. Package comes with free parking included both at the lodge and at the park for an easy journey between the two. 😀
    Depending on how long you are planning to stay we used to stay at Val d'Europe and then walk in or catch one of the buses that are put on from the local hotel to Eurodisney. Our typical approach was to go to Paris for 2 weeks and then spend 1 day in Disney, 1 in Paris....

    Val d'Europe gives you the ability to hop into Paris by train whenever you want...

    From memory I think the walk was shorter than the walk from the far end of Disney's car parks...
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405

    johnt said:

    johnt said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda

    Tho I predict Labour - which could easily get crushed by this issue in months - will adopt a form of Rwanda. In fact I expect a Europe wide consensus on this. It will feel less “fash” if everyone does it
    Under what law are we ‘towing people to France’? I am so bored with hearing this stuff.
    If only there was a Europe wide body where political issues could be discussed and where we could develop a ‘Europe wide consensus’. Perhaps someone should develop something the UK could join.
    The French kicked an Imam all the way to Morocco for making some Alan's Snackbar comments. Been in France for x decades. Punting him there was illegal, apparently. "Je suis desolate"* was the response from the French government to that.

    *Roughly translated - "Oh Dear, Never Mind, How Sad."
    Thanks for the patronising guff, but that is not an answer my question.
    I presume you have resorted to the patronising approach as the answer is unpalatable? Oh Dear, never mind, how sad.
    The point was that the French State simply break the law when there is conflict between what the government wants to do and the law.

    Now whether you want a governmental system that throws human rights under the bus when a problem arises is another story.

    Think of the Greek coastguard killing hundreds, while trying to tow a migrant boat. Horrible and stupid.

    In many ways we should be proud that the response to the boat people has been to fish them out of the water, give them Domino’s pizza and block book the kind of medium quality country hotels that have the ski machines next to the swimming pool.
    I strongly doubt they were trying to tow it
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682

    After my last trip to Paris I wouldn’t object if they nuked Paris.

    @Leon reports that they already have.
    Who did it?
    The French. :)
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,568
    kjh said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
    Don't you have a contradiction there. You say hundreds drown already. You also say they will stop coming if we tow them back so the extra risk of drowning will in the end save lives as it will stop them coming.

    Why will it stop them coming if they risk drowning already? They will still come in a hope of not being caught.

    Re you last sentence that is a genuine worry I agree.
    Because they won’t risk drowning if they know there is a 100% chance they will simply be towed back to France
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,177
    edited June 25
    DougSeal said:

    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
    If you've never felt emotionally moved in Hyde Park or Kensington Gardens on a warm summer evening....
    Is that a euphemism ?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861

    Nine days to go. (Or about a fortnight if you are LauraK/BigG)

    8 days. Today has already started so it is 8 whole days (the entire of Wednesday to Wednesday) to go. And a bit. 9 sleeps.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    How many electors will be voting by post at this election? More and more at each successive election it would seem. With the ballor forms having arrived through letter boxes over the past week, it would seem likely that perhaps millions will have already voted and to a significant extent therefore the die is already cast.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366
    edited June 25
    algarkirk said:

    Nine days to go. (Or about a fortnight if you are LauraK/BigG)

    8 days. Today has already started so it is 8 whole days (the entire of Wednesday to Wednesday) to go. And a bit. 9 sleeps.
    Days is one more than sleeps, not fewer.

    10 days between now and the election (today is a day and its not done yet, plus we have the Thursday itself), 11 until PM Starmer.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Nigelb said:

    DougSeal said:

    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
    If you've never felt emotionally moved in Hyde Park or Kensington Gardens on a warm summer evening....
    I that a euphemism ?
    If you know, you know...
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,177
    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    There are some quite good Turkish barbers which makes me doubt the money laundering angle. American Candy on the other hand...I used to look at the vast number of empty Angus/Aberdeen Steak houses in prime London Locations and think the same thing though - so who knows.
    China says hold my beer.
    https://x.com/tedgioia/status/1805435702886212093
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861

    Breaking news. Someone has thrown a 99 with extra chocolate sauce on Farage in Uxbridge. He needs some new Pr now as things have gone a bit quiet. Not really by the way.

    Not seen this so it may be flake news. 99s to cost 99p is in someone's manifesto. Is it Mr Binface? FWIW I agree with this policy.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,947

    How many electors will be voting by post at this election? More and more at each successive election it would seem. With the ballor forms having arrived through letter boxes over the past week, it would seem likely that perhaps millions will have already voted and to a significant extent therefore the die is already cast.

    Interesting how the exit poll is seemingly able to account for postal votes.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 23,145
    HYUFD said:

    Women tend to vote for liberal and centrist parties more than men. Men tend to vote more for hard right nationalist parties than women. In the US women are less likely to vote for Trump than men too.

    Of course pre Blair women also voted Tory largely while men mostly voted Labour, especially working class men

    Another way of writing all that is women consistently tend to vote for the sensible one.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures. Last week I went to the Eras tour on one night and Opera Holland Park for Tosca another, from the wondrous and free treasure of the National Gallery to erotic gay porn at Studio Voltaire in Clapham. From the high priestess of feminist art Judy Chicago at the Serpentine, to Cézanne at the Courthauld. It’s endless and magnificent.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    You might be able to but how many people do so ?

    The average Londoner visits one of the museums about once or twice a year:

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/630146/leading-london-visitor-attractions-uk/

    Perhaps the attractions of London are wasted on the people who live there.
    I lived in Greenwich for nearly 6 years. I moved in a few months before the Cutty Sark fire in 2007 (it had been closed for renovations for several months already) and moved out just before it was reopened in 2012. So despite living there for over half a decade I've never visited Greenwich's biggest tourist attraction.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,167
    DougSeal said:

    algarkirk said:

    Andy_JS said:

    @Heathener ignore the prats, London is the greatest city in the world.

    True. I don't live there but it is the greatest city in the world, but not because of the way it looks, which is frequently awful.
    The square mile of the City of London remains one of the most magical places on earth, despite all the attempts to trash it. The rest of London mostly teeters between ghastly set piece stuff (Buckingham Palace etc) and a squalor which feels carefully deliberated. I wonder how the late Ian Nairn would write his old Penguin 'Nairn's London' now?
    If you've never felt emotionally moved in Hyde Park or Kensington Gardens on a warm summer evening you were probably being driven through in an ambulance. Ditto Waterlow and Greenwich Parks.
    London has parks. The rest of the country has countryside.

    Case closed.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    Just in - “Israel’s Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the government to draft ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Israeli Jews into the military”

    The squealing will be magnificent.

    Compliance with law for thee, not me, seems the stereotype of any ultra orthodox individual.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,861

    algarkirk said:

    Nine days to go. (Or about a fortnight if you are LauraK/BigG)

    8 days. Today has already started so it is 8 whole days (the entire of Wednesday to Wednesday) to go. And a bit. 9 sleeps.
    Days is one more than sleeps, not fewer.

    10 days between now and the election (today is a day and its not done yet, plus we have the Thursday itself), 11 until PM Starmer.
    On election day I shall: vote, look at 'Dogs at Polling Stations', read a 1930s detective novel and think about inclusive counting in early Elamite society. According to BR above there will, on election day, still be one day to the election as there are 10 days from now, not 8, so I think I shall actually vote on Friday 5th and hope that works.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    algarkirk said:

    Breaking news. Someone has thrown a 99 with extra chocolate sauce on Farage in Uxbridge. He needs some new Pr now as things have gone a bit quiet. Not really by the way.

    Not seen this so it may be flake news. 99s to cost 99p is in someone's manifesto. Is it Mr Binface? FWIW I agree with this policy.
    Yep - that's in Binface's manifesto.

  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,947
    Arguably the most important witness at the PO inquiry is about to give evidence, Gareth Jenkins.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E5hMX1rryk
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,466
    eek said:

    Gareth Jenkins today starts the first of 4 days of evidence at the post office enquiry.

    Going to be interesting to see how much blame he can pin on others to protect himself from perjury charges...

    He's pretty much bang to rights already on perjury. The big question is to what extent he goes rogue and incriminates others.

    Starting right now.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Leon said:

    kjh said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
    Don't you have a contradiction there. You say hundreds drown already. You also say they will stop coming if we tow them back so the extra risk of drowning will in the end save lives as it will stop them coming.

    Why will it stop them coming if they risk drowning already? They will still come in a hope of not being caught.

    Re you last sentence that is a genuine worry I agree.
    Because they won’t risk drowning if they know there is a 100% chance they will simply be towed back to France
    This is the canard that the right keeps repeating - "They won't risk it if they know [they'll be sent to Rwanda/towed back/made to read the Spectator]" (delete as appropriate).

    There's no evidence set out that the migrants would either know about such policies or care even if they did. Like any criminal who boasts they will get away with it, the smugglers will claim a secure route to take their money. You're just making assertions with no evidence.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 23,145

    How many electors will be voting by post at this election? More and more at each successive election it would seem. With the ballor forms having arrived through letter boxes over the past week, it would seem likely that perhaps millions will have already voted and to a significant extent therefore the die is already cast.

    Saves needing any ID!
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586
    Andy_JS said:

    Arguably the most important witness at the PO inquiry is about to give evidence, Gareth Jenkins.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E5hMX1rryk

    Going to be a lot of questions where privilege against self-incrimination is used..
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,167

    How many electors will be voting by post at this election? More and more at each successive election it would seem. With the ballor forms having arrived through letter boxes over the past week, it would seem likely that perhaps millions will have already voted and to a significant extent therefore the die is already cast.

    We switched to postal voting because of Covid, and have stuck with it. I assume that there are others who did similar. Coupled with a lower overall turnout, I would anticipate a bigger proportion of postal ballots than 5 years ago.

    Perhaps as high as 25% of votes cast?
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366
    algarkirk said:

    algarkirk said:

    Nine days to go. (Or about a fortnight if you are LauraK/BigG)

    8 days. Today has already started so it is 8 whole days (the entire of Wednesday to Wednesday) to go. And a bit. 9 sleeps.
    Days is one more than sleeps, not fewer.

    10 days between now and the election (today is a day and its not done yet, plus we have the Thursday itself), 11 until PM Starmer.
    On election day I shall: vote, look at 'Dogs at Polling Stations', read a 1930s detective novel and think about inclusive counting in early Elamite society. According to BR above there will, on election day, still be one day to the election as there are 10 days from now, not 8, so I think I shall actually vote on Friday 5th and hope that works.
    Not according to me, according to the calendar.

    Today is a day, which we haven't finished yet.

    Today - 1
    Tomorrow - 2
    Thursday - 3

    Etc until the election on day 10.

    And Starmer becomes PM the following day.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682
    Nunu5 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    I passed one at the weekend, a customer was getting the "flames in the earhole" treatment.
    Turkish barbers aren't money laundering.
    The young men if today just get way more treatment such as perms etc. They spend more money on their looks than before.
    (Also there are many more people)
    When do they get these treatments? The places always seem empty.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,586

    eek said:

    Gareth Jenkins today starts the first of 4 days of evidence at the post office enquiry.

    Going to be interesting to see how much blame he can pin on others to protect himself from perjury charges...

    He's pretty much bang to rights already on perjury. The big question is to what extent he goes rogue and incriminates others.

    Starting right now.
    Love the starting point - let's go to your 5th witness statement consisting of 3 pages of corrections to the 4 previous witness statements..
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,177
    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    kjh said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
    Don't you have a contradiction there. You say hundreds drown already. You also say they will stop coming if we tow them back so the extra risk of drowning will in the end save lives as it will stop them coming.

    Why will it stop them coming if they risk drowning already? They will still come in a hope of not being caught.

    Re you last sentence that is a genuine worry I agree.
    Because they won’t risk drowning if they know there is a 100% chance they will simply be towed back to France
    This is the canard that the right keeps repeating - "They won't risk it if they know [they'll be sent to Rwanda/towed back/made to read the Spectator]" (delete as appropriate).

    There's no evidence set out that the migrants would either know about such policies or care even if they did. Like any criminal who boasts they will get away with it, the smugglers will claim a secure route to take their money. You're just making assertions with no evidence.
    "We've got to be a bit fascist to stop the fascists being elected" is also dubious assertion rather than fact.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,947
    edited June 25
    "Peter Ruddick
    @ruddick

    Paula Vennells was up at the @PostOffInquiry for three days.
    Gareth Jenkins is up for four.

    - Known as the 'architect' of Horizon.
    - Used as an expert witness in court.
    - Appearance has been postponed twice.
    - Mentioned every day at the inquiry.

    Huge moment."

    https://x.com/ruddick/status/1805506156720173152
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,568
    edited June 25
    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    kjh said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    O/T As widely predicted:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/24/number-of-people-crossing-channel-in-small-boats-hits-new-high

    Could this be the real reason Sunak daren't delay the GE further?

    We have to start towing them back to France, if no one is prepared to do Rwanda
    Sorry, cannot accept that. I am not happy clappy, all people are legal, welcome them all in, open borders, like many in Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens are but you cannot risk a single persons life by doing that.

    You also have to have a proper process to allow people to apply to come here rather than risk their lives on boats and then just turn up and disappear into the black economy.
    Stop being such a flake

    Their lives are already being risked. They drown quite regularly. And hundreds drown in the Med

    If we tow them back they will stop coming so in the end you will save many more lives than might be lost. You just have to be quite ruthless at first

    Also, this is inevitable. In the end if you don’t do this voters will elect fascists that will do much much worse than this. See the recent European elex
    Don't you have a contradiction there. You say hundreds drown already. You also say they will stop coming if we tow them back so the extra risk of drowning will in the end save lives as it will stop them coming.

    Why will it stop them coming if they risk drowning already? They will still come in a hope of not being caught.

    Re you last sentence that is a genuine worry I agree.
    Because they won’t risk drowning if they know there is a 100% chance they will simply be towed back to France
    This is the canard that the right keeps repeating - "They won't risk it if they know [they'll be sent to Rwanda/towed back/made to read the Spectator]" (delete as appropriate).

    There's no evidence set out that the migrants would either know about such policies or care even if they did. Like any criminal who boasts they will get away with it, the smugglers will claim a secure route to take their money. You're just making assertions with no evidence.
    1. Logic

    2. Australia

    But I tell you what, you just keep doing what you’re doing and then in the end the British will elect somebody much nastier than nigel Farage to get this done. See Europe passim

    I won’t be pleased - I’d far rather we weren’t governed by the extreme right - but I’m right wing so I’ll probably cope. I imagine it will be much less pleasant for you

    There is no reason why the British will be immune to the rightwards surge across the western world. We are NOT exceptional, merely behind the curve
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,366
    edited June 25

    Nunu5 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Roger said:

    Fun in France. The New Popular Front are having to go out of their way to say its leader Jean-Luc Melenchon will not be the Prime Minister if they win. While he leads the alliance he is not that popular with the electorate.


    https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/jean-luc-melenchon-l-impopulaire-du-nouveau-front-de-gauche-20240624

    It's always fun in Paris. Time to put the computer down. Start at the Musee d'Orsay and take a Bateaux Mouche...the good life doesn't end at Stoke-on-Trent.
    Musee d'Orsay is the best place in Paris. the rest of it is boring, like London. Though I did enjoy Notre Dame the exhibition on the rebuilding was really interesting you could sit on the stands and watch the roof being rebuilt bit by bit. I'm in Les Yvelines next week and can only enthuse myself to go to Paris as Im meeting an old friend for lunch.
    London and Paris are boring?

    Wow. Just wow.
    I accept youre easily impressed and dont get out much.
    Oh Alan why do you slip so readily into Ad Hominem? Ask yourself this, no need to reply.

    It’s because I go out stacks that I don’t find London and Paris boring. There is sooooooo much to do. So many amazing galleries, fantastic eating, brilliant concerts. It’s a cornucopia of sensory pleasures.

    You can, literally, spend every single night of the year out in London and never do the same thing twice. Amazing city.
    That sort of depends what interests you. Chasing Candy Crush stores or overpriced restaurants isnt my bag. Ive worked in Paris long enough to treat it with the contempt it deserves and London just isnt me. I like Berlin, Prague Barcelona they are interesting. However I much prefer the countryside and landscape so much more to appreciate.
    I can't see an American Candy Store without assuming it's a money laundering operation.

    They seem to be everywhere now, well stocked, but there's never anyone in them.
    Interestingly - !! - they aren’t just a london thing. Lots in Paris too. And Spain
    So, where on earth has that come from?

    There aren't that many - if any - Americans here and, "what I really want and need is lots of American Candy!!", said no-one - ever.
    Yes it is very strange. Like a meme spreading

    There must be some evolutionary reason - something that makes “candy stores” extremely easy to set up and maintain and staff - no need for security, nothing to steal, no training required? - so they can then be used for money laundering. Which is what they clearly are

    I’m less convinced that Turkish barbers are all money laundering. Tho some must be
    I passed one at the weekend, a customer was getting the "flames in the earhole" treatment.
    Turkish barbers aren't money laundering.
    The young men if today just get way more treatment such as perms etc. They spend more money on their looks than before.
    (Also there are many more people)
    When do they get these treatments? The places always seem empty.
    But their overheads are presumably low since most of the money can go to their own labour.

    I get my hair cut regularly at one of these barbers, don't go for any of the frilly extras just a plain clipper cut. £10 for about 6 minutes work, if he does five of them in an hour that's £50 an hour takings even if its empty half the time.
This discussion has been closed.