Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Another tricky by-election defence for the Tories – politicalbetting.com

1235710

Comments

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,914
    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    If you believe that you need lessons in reality.

    Out of 220,000 death certificates which mention COVID as a contributory factor you are dismissing 219,000 as COVID irrelevant. That's absurd
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    edited June 2023

    Re inflation.

    Wouldn't changing pension increases back to inflation only be a way of taking future demand out of the system ?

    As well as making the country a little fairer.

    State Pensions? They *are* at inflation. And recently changed to the lower variant (CPI not RPI).

    (IIRC thewre is a minimum 2 percentahge point increase, to raise state pensions towards the average wage. But this is moot at present, obviously.)
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,477
    There's an interesting back story to bannock in Canada involving Colonialism.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bannock_(Indigenous_American)
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,491
    .

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Now that's a damascene conversion to match any on PB - you spent two years demanding more, longer and harder lockdowns.

    Actually the first lockdown was necessary.

    But the subsequent two could have been avoided if the government had restricted foreign holidays for a year.
    Subsequent lockdowns may have been avoidable if the Government had done more to get people with symptoms to test and done more to support people self-isolating.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    kle4 said:

    I somehow missed this one - what a card, eh?

    @Guto_Harri reveals on his @LBC podcast @BorisJohnson's private verdict last year on allegations of sexual harassment by MPs:
    "As he put it in the heat of the moment: ‘If we took away the whip from everyone here, who's pinched someone's bottom, we'll lose our majority.’"

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1669239719249559552

    It's ok though, because it was heat of the moment.

    Huh? I suspect few on here have ever assaulted anyone in that way. If I tried that, I would expect to be both subsequently eating through a straw and summoned for an appointment with a magistrate.
    He probably was thinking ‘all of them have shaken hands with me so they’ve all touched an arse.’

  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037
    edited June 2023
    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 4,029

    kle4 said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    The first lockdown was necessary and proportionate for the surging crisis. I don't think it would have worked without legal measures either, not to get the necessary level of compliance to prevent being overwhelmed. I don't think pre-vaccine we could have coped with loosened arrangements.

    Could some other lockdowns have been avoided or ended sooner, or done on a more urged behaviour than legal threat basis? Possibly.

    Whilst we need to look back on what we did, I do think there is a bit of lockdown remorse going on which is stretching too far from 'Some were not needed/should not have been so long or restrictive' to 'they were not necessary at any time'.
    The first lockdown worked. Infection levels were way down. And then Sunak had his bright idea of Eat Out to Catch Covid and back into lockdown we went.

    Then you had the nonsense tier system with the pubs in Leeds shut and the pubs in York open. Thereby encouraging more travel and more spread.

    There was lots wrong in the government's response to Covid. However, blanket lockdown was the one policy that they got right.
    I'm quite looking forward to finding out how some of the more odd (to my mind) rules were arrived at during the 'tiering phase'. Assuming we do of course. I remember one local rule we had was you were allowed to meet up outdoors in groups of upto 20 (or rather 'two groups of upto 10') - but you *must* stay at least a metre apart. And wondering at the time how they arrived at that.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    dixiedean said:

    There's an interesting back story to bannock in Canada involving Colonialism.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bannock_(Indigenous_American)

    That's really interesting - the basic Scots oatcake/bannock cookery method, at the fire in the ashes or on a plate/stone, would be much the same as the original local methods anyway. So ti would depend on the details of the bannock whether anything other than the name was Scots in origin.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167
    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    She should have got out of her Cave a bit more, those flickering shadows can send you doolaly.
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037

    .

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Now that's a damascene conversion to match any on PB - you spent two years demanding more, longer and harder lockdowns.

    Actually the first lockdown was necessary.

    But the subsequent two could have been avoided if the government had restricted foreign holidays for a year.
    Subsequent lockdowns may have been avoidable if the Government had done more to get people with symptoms to test and done more to support people self-isolating.
    Better air filtration and ventilation could also have helped a lot - and would help a lot in future during future respiratory virus pandemics.

    Good quality HEPA filters and far-UV treatment of air in all schools and hospitals. That way we could look to avoiding closing schools.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    So if England had had a proper keeper, they would have a first innings lead rather than Aus about to get that.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    Nigelb said:

    .

    glw said:

    Westie said:

    I don't know why you blame journalists. That's what the whole middle class thinks. (I will steer clear of definitional issues for the moment.) "It's always the people in the middle that get squeezed the most", etc. Whingeing c*nts.

    There is a lot of truth in that. Probably because most people think they are normal and average, rather than exceptional, and because the people they mix with and live amongst look like them, so "this" must be the norm.

    I still blame journalists because even the thickest of them ought to be able to quickly look up some data about income and household wealth and wonder "is this really middle class?"
    Setting any sympathy aside, in terms of the economic effect (and this effectiveness) of the interest rate rises, that on middle class home owners is pretty significant. Which is the point of them, rather than an argument against them.
    Middle class home owners with big mortgages.

    Middle class home owners without big mortgages will be having their spending power increased as they get interest on their savings.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,230
    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    .

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Now that's a damascene conversion to match any on PB - you spent two years demanding more, longer and harder lockdowns.

    Actually the first lockdown was necessary.

    But the subsequent two could have been avoided if the government had restricted foreign holidays for a year.
    Subsequent lockdowns may have been avoidable if the Government had done more to get people with symptoms to test and done more to support people self-isolating.
    Better air filtration and ventilation could also have helped a lot - and would help a lot in future during future respiratory virus pandemics.

    Good quality HEPA filters and far-UV treatment of air in all schools and hospitals. That way we could look to avoiding closing schools.
    It would help a lot just during the ordinary cold and flu season.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,779
    I see we have a new candidate for a protected characteristic in discrimination legislation. Mark Rylance thinks "difficult" people are not tolerated in the theatre these days:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65942440

    Reading this really made me angry. I think it's so unfair that difficult people are being discriminated against in the theatre, I have never read any hint that there was any bias at all against difficult actors in the good old days. The law really should be changed so that discrimination against difficult people is outlawed.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    ydoethur said:

    .

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Now that's a damascene conversion to match any on PB - you spent two years demanding more, longer and harder lockdowns.

    Actually the first lockdown was necessary.

    But the subsequent two could have been avoided if the government had restricted foreign holidays for a year.
    Subsequent lockdowns may have been avoidable if the Government had done more to get people with symptoms to test and done more to support people self-isolating.
    Better air filtration and ventilation could also have helped a lot - and would help a lot in future during future respiratory virus pandemics.

    Good quality HEPA filters and far-UV treatment of air in all schools and hospitals. That way we could look to avoiding closing schools.
    It would help a lot just during the ordinary cold and flu season.
    Especially teachers and anyone else in contact with the mobile petri dishes called "children".
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,914
    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    I somehow missed this one - what a card, eh?

    @Guto_Harri reveals on his @LBC podcast @BorisJohnson's private verdict last year on allegations of sexual harassment by MPs:
    "As he put it in the heat of the moment: ‘If we took away the whip from everyone here, who's pinched someone's bottom, we'll lose our majority.’"

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1669239719249559552

    It's ok though, because it was heat of the moment.

    Huh? I suspect few on here have ever assaulted anyone in that way. If I tried that, I would expect to be both subsequently eating through a straw and summoned for an appointment with a magistrate.
    I noticed in Glenda Jackson's obituaries that she said she'd never been in a relationship where she had not been beaten by her partner.
    I suspect that the propensity to assault one's partner or children unfettered at home is more prevalent than casually assaulting a random stranger in the street.

    Now for all those lockdown deniers with whom I normally defend the policy, I suspect they have a point when they reference domestic abuse and violence during lockdowns as a much under reported crime. For those locked up with a violent partner or parent, lockdowns must have been hell on earth.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,477
    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    There's an interesting back story to bannock in Canada involving Colonialism.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bannock_(Indigenous_American)

    That's really interesting - the basic Scots oatcake/bannock cookery method, at the fire in the ashes or on a plate/stone, would be much the same as the original local methods anyway. So ti would depend on the details of the bannock whether anything other than the name was Scots in origin.
    Yes.
    Essentially, they both made the same thing, more or less. With regional variations of both. It's got the Scottish name, cos early settlers knew damn well what it was.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,509

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    How did Sweden survive in that case
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,959

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    People with conditions are still PEOPLE. They wouldn’t have died were it not for COVID.

    Did anyone say they weren't? The point is the lockdown probably caused more damage than it prevented.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,779

    kle4 said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    The first lockdown was necessary and proportionate for the surging crisis. I don't think it would have worked without legal measures either, not to get the necessary level of compliance to prevent being overwhelmed. I don't think pre-vaccine we could have coped with loosened arrangements.

    Could some other lockdowns have been avoided or ended sooner, or done on a more urged behaviour than legal threat basis? Possibly.

    Whilst we need to look back on what we did, I do think there is a bit of lockdown remorse going on which is stretching too far from 'Some were not needed/should not have been so long or restrictive' to 'they were not necessary at any time'.
    The first lockdown worked. Infection levels were way down. And then Sunak had his bright idea of Eat Out to Catch Covid and back into lockdown we went.

    Then you had the nonsense tier system with the pubs in Leeds shut and the pubs in York open. Thereby encouraging more travel and more spread.

    There was lots wrong in the government's response to Covid. However, blanket lockdown was the one policy that they got right.
    People going to restaurants wouldn't have spread covid if nobody had it.

    It was allowing covid to be imported again in summer 2020 which was the mistake.
    The stupidity of these comments is absolutely breathtaking.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,914

    Who is Plato?

    A Blaitite who became full-on right wing ding-dong. So be careful. Stop watching GB News!
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,246
    ..
    dixiedean said:

    FF43 said:

    ..

    Farooq said:

    TimS said:

    kle4 said:

    Farooq said:

    Foxy said:

    darkage said:

    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I went for a pint in Brexit Central and everybody’s rather bitter

    A wish for sovereignty drove voters in Clacton-on-Sea to Leave. But optimism has given way to anger

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-went-for-a-pint-in-brexit-central-and-everybodys-rather-bitter-mmbnccpcs

    Brexit is a racist endeavour.

    In the Moon and Starfish, a Wetherspoon’s pub on the Clacton seafront, the day drinking crowd were well into their third pints by Thursday lunchtime. When I brought up Brexit, it was viewed with a sense of wasted opportunity, like a football team who had thrown away a two-goal lead.

    “I expected problems from day one. It’s the British way,” said Trevor, 77, a retired commodities trader. “I hoped it would be good, but it hasn’t panned out; the politicians have let us down as usual. Boris is an arsehole. He’s always been an arsehole.”

    “Independence” and “standing on our own two feet” were the most common rationales I heard for Brexit, but, like many in Clacton, Trevor had also hoped that leaving the EU would allow the government to drastically reduce immigration. Clearly, this hasn’t happened. “We need to stop the boats — this country is full,” he said. Then he looked at me. “I’m not being rude to you, but it’s to stop the n*****s coming in.” Right then.
    I hear similar all the time from people of that generation. I’m not racist but….. type stuff. From the Boomer generation who grew up in a white country.

    The question is how different are the Gen Xers and Millennials who have grown up in an increasingly multicultural society? Much more tolerant in the main? If Brexit was primarily about enabling a dying generation to express its racism, then it’s unsustainable.
    One of the things that struck me about the Yorkshire Cricket Club racism scandal is that those involved were considerably younger than me. Ditto police officers who get caught up in such scandals.

    I’m Gen X.
    Anyone thinking that the young are somehow free of prejudice needs to get out into the real world. Look at the misogyny, racism and homophobia we have seen described in many institutions and the people exhibiting these - many of them young. These prejudices just take different forms and get packaged differently. Sexism towards women is quite shocking and often comes from young men against women of all ages, for instance. There are also some pretty unpleasant descriptions of old people by the young - sometimes on this forum.
    Your general point is true, and you can get some strong sexism from a 20 year old bro who knows all the right terms and forms to present as being free from prejudice.

    But I am interested in what you consider over the line in terms of prejudice against the old. Is someone railing against the government reliant on and thus wholly focused on the needs of retirees over the line? Is someone blaming that cohorts priorities on housing or immigration over the line, wrong, or just exaggerating? Is all that fine so long as bad words are not used?
    The idea that prejudice can be removed from the human experience is one that I find absolutely deranged and comical, but this is consistent with a long history of progressive ideas. In the end all these projects end in tragedy and failure.

    I've mentioned the initiative below a few times, 'prejudice reporting in education', an example of the phenomenon I am raising.


    https://www.prfe.education/

    Indeed. I think the sane view is that *something approaching* an unbiased view of people can only be achieved through continuous self examination.

    Anyone who says “I can’t be biased, I am X/a member of Y” can be presumed to be biased.
    We all have prejudices, and it it examination and acknowledgement of these that allows us to overcome them.

    It needs to be in a supportive culture though, not Maoist Cultural Revolution style self criticism.
    Sadly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
    Some people react with horrified fury at the idea of unconscious bias and if they can be persuaded to take those little tests that purport to identify them, reject them wholeheartedly.

    The issue, I think, is the stigma admitting bias. But if we can get past that and be comfortable with seeing our own biases, it's not the end of the world and it can save us from making embarrassing mistakes.

    One of my biases is around around gender. I suspect it's very common. If I hear certain genderless job names, like "doctor" or "nurse", I have a tendency to picture one gender or the other. Now that I know I do this, I can consciously remember not to carry that assumption forward into saying something stupid. (Of course, I still say many other stupid things).

    I don't blame myself for having those early-learned gendered ideas, and I don't think anyone else should either. But a lot of people are terrified of being seen as having biases and so will avoid doing something about them.
    I think unconscious bias is definitely a thing, as you say it might be around instinctively picturing something, and you probably would not act any differently were that instinct incorrect.

    I do think that the impact of it can be vastly overstated, and there have been some comical examples of advice and training on the subject which seems to me to be likely to have the opposite effect - like the one about not making enough eye contact with some people, which seemed likely to result in people making too much eye contact at people of a specific race, etc, in an effort to overcome it.

    I do think microaggressions are utter bullshit though- far too open to abuse to condemn people for something both slight and unintentional (if even real), and to make people hyper aware and sensitive to see slights where there are none.
    This is where nuance is important. Micro aggressions cross a wide spectrum. There’s a big difference between “so you’re Italian, bet you get cross when people put pineapple on pizza” and “calm down dear” or “let me feel your fuzzy hair”.

    I had a someone at work complain to me that a senior colleague had described him (a Mexican) as South American. On the basis this level of geographical ignorance was borderline racist. I couldn’t get excited by that when most Americans think we live in a country called England and half the world thinks it’s always foggy in London.
    I eat pineapple on pizza and if some Italian tries to stop me you won't see a microaggression from me, I will make war on the whole country. Tanks on the Piazza di Siena. Internment camps, war crimes THE WORKS.
    I had pizza with pineapple in Pisa. And very nice it was too.

    Pizza condemnation should be reserved for those where the base is several inches thick and resembles a stottie cake.
    If you have a piece a pizza in Pisa, you have no reason to expect authenticity. Everyone knows pizza is an American invention and the pineapple version is Canadian. Possibly the only Canadian national dish.
    Poutine. Bannock.
    Poutine is definitively Quebecois. I don't think it's a feature in Winnipeg.

    Bannock is of course Scottish, most famously from Selkirk, but also giving its name to the field where that famous battle took place.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Andy_JS said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    People with conditions are still PEOPLE. They wouldn’t have died were it not for COVID.

    Did anyone say they weren't? The point is the lockdown probably caused more damage than it prevented.
    How can you judge what damage it prevented? What study are you relying on for that?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,491

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,509

    Re inflation.

    Wouldn't changing pension increases back to inflation only be a way of taking future demand out of the system ?

    As well as making the country a little fairer.

    NO , pure Bollocks
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    Chris said:

    I see we have a new candidate for a protected characteristic in discrimination legislation. Mark Rylance thinks "difficult" people are not tolerated in the theatre these days:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65942440

    Reading this really made me angry. I think it's so unfair that difficult people are being discriminated against in the theatre, I have never read any hint that there was any bias at all against difficult actors in the good old days. The law really should be changed so that discrimination against difficult people is outlawed.

    Remarkable how you have taken that intreview (which I watched) and managed to make it seem like he was trying to make it some sort of victimhood. He wasn't. He was simply speaking up for those who are difficult and think outside the box and, when directly asked, said he didn't think people like him would make it in the theatre and film today because they were difficult to get along with. If anything it was a recognition of his own failings with a thought that perhaps the world needs more difficult people as they make change happen.

    The closest it got to special pleading was a call for being more tolerant of thise who do not always ascribe to mainstream views.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,153
    A
    viewcode said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @iainjwatson
    But @michaelgove doesn't advocate stripping Shaun Bailey and Ben Mallett (the latter is in the video) of their honours - saying the responsibility for that honours list was @BorisJohnson 's

    The whole of British politics is not "how do I fix this problem" but instead "how do I blame somebody else for it"
    That it utterly incorrect.

    The whole of public life is about avoiding responsibility for those at the top. Blaming someone else would mean, eventually, blame would come to you.

    Hence Lessons Will Be Learned.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,145

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Now that's a damascene conversion to match any on PB - you spent two years demanding more, longer and harder lockdowns.

    Actually the first lockdown was necessary.

    But the subsequent two could have been avoided if the government had restricted foreign holidays for a year.
    Am I not allowed to change my mind?
    I was never a lockdown enthusiast, and think they generally went on too long, albeit with relatively less restrictive features.

    Worth noting that in the immediate aftermath of a true lockdown, cases often go up as family members are confined together, before dropping.

    There was a lot of absurdity about wearing masks moving about in restaurants and pubs, but not while seated, one way systems, whether a Scotch Egg constitutes a meal etc.

    Keeping schools and universities open would have presented its own problems, not least in transmission but also in the inevitable difficulties with teachers being off sick etc.

    I think furlough etc went on far too long, and was the expensive bit, and prone to sharp practice like business support.

    I don't think it will be needed again as Covid was a fairly unique pandemic in an immune naive population with a virus most infective while pre-symptomatic. We now have endemic covid but also herd immunity.

    Novel viruses will happen, but it be different.

  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    Carnyx said:

    Re inflation.

    Wouldn't changing pension increases back to inflation only be a way of taking future demand out of the system ?

    As well as making the country a little fairer.

    State Pensions? They *are* at inflation. And recently changed to the lower variant (CPI not RPI).

    (IIRC thewre is a minimum 2 percentahge point increase, to raise state pensions towards the average wage. But this is moot at present, obviously.)
    Sure but inflation is likely to drop below the rate of pay rises soon so next year's increase will be affected.

    Maybe it only affects demand of such things as Werthers Originals and Sunday carveries in chain pubs.
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
    Could you explain my misunderstanding?

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653
    No government help in the world will make the average person wash their hands for half a minute or sit in their bedroom alone for two weeks.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    ydoethur said:

    So if England had had a proper keeper, they would have a first innings lead rather than Aus about to get that.

    Nope because in that case Australia would already have surpassed a poor England total long ago.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    edited June 2023

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    Richard you okay mate? You're been very angry this last week, hope everything is actually okay
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,223
    Australia are going to declare soon to get a bowl at England before lunch, right? Right? 🫤
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395

    Carnyx said:

    Re inflation.

    Wouldn't changing pension increases back to inflation only be a way of taking future demand out of the system ?

    As well as making the country a little fairer.

    State Pensions? They *are* at inflation. And recently changed to the lower variant (CPI not RPI).

    (IIRC thewre is a minimum 2 percentahge point increase, to raise state pensions towards the average wage. But this is moot at present, obviously.)
    Sure but inflation is likely to drop below the rate of pay rises soon so next year's increase will be affected.

    Maybe it only affects demand of such things as Werthers Originals and Sunday carveries in chain pubs.
    But that's the way the system works. The increase at the start of each FY is the inflation *over the previous year*. What happens during the next FY is irrelevant, in that sense. (And the state pensioner has had to put up with a year's worth of inflation, meantime.)

    You'd need actual deflation for real anomalies.

    The above applies, of course, also to workers and pay rises, which deal with inflation which is now baked in, not what will happen next year - often carefully ignored by right-wing commentators.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,491

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
    Could you explain my misunderstanding?

    That would be a lengthy discussion, but probably it comes down to some mixture of stupidity and a desire to believe in partisan fantasies.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,246
    ..
    FF43 said:

    ..

    dixiedean said:

    FF43 said:

    ..

    Farooq said:

    TimS said:

    kle4 said:

    Farooq said:

    Foxy said:

    darkage said:

    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I went for a pint in Brexit Central and everybody’s rather bitter

    A wish for sovereignty drove voters in Clacton-on-Sea to Leave. But optimism has given way to anger

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-went-for-a-pint-in-brexit-central-and-everybodys-rather-bitter-mmbnccpcs

    Brexit is a racist endeavour.

    In the Moon and Starfish, a Wetherspoon’s pub on the Clacton seafront, the day drinking crowd were well into their third pints by Thursday lunchtime. When I brought up Brexit, it was viewed with a sense of wasted opportunity, like a football team who had thrown away a two-goal lead.

    “I expected problems from day one. It’s the British way,” said Trevor, 77, a retired commodities trader. “I hoped it would be good, but it hasn’t panned out; the politicians have let us down as usual. Boris is an arsehole. He’s always been an arsehole.”

    “Independence” and “standing on our own two feet” were the most common rationales I heard for Brexit, but, like many in Clacton, Trevor had also hoped that leaving the EU would allow the government to drastically reduce immigration. Clearly, this hasn’t happened. “We need to stop the boats — this country is full,” he said. Then he looked at me. “I’m not being rude to you, but it’s to stop the n*****s coming in.” Right then.
    I hear similar all the time from people of that generation. I’m not racist but….. type stuff. From the Boomer generation who grew up in a white country.

    The question is how different are the Gen Xers and Millennials who have grown up in an increasingly multicultural society? Much more tolerant in the main? If Brexit was primarily about enabling a dying generation to express its racism, then it’s unsustainable.
    One of the things that struck me about the Yorkshire Cricket Club racism scandal is that those involved were considerably younger than me. Ditto police officers who get caught up in such scandals.

    I’m Gen X.
    Anyone thinking that the young are somehow free of prejudice needs to get out into the real world. Look at the misogyny, racism and homophobia we have seen described in many institutions and the people exhibiting these - many of them young. These prejudices just take different forms and get packaged differently. Sexism towards women is quite shocking and often comes from young men against women of all ages, for instance. There are also some pretty unpleasant descriptions of old people by the young - sometimes on this forum.
    Your general point is true, and you can get some strong sexism from a 20 year old bro who knows all the right terms and forms to present as being free from prejudice.

    But I am interested in what you consider over the line in terms of prejudice against the old. Is someone railing against the government reliant on and thus wholly focused on the needs of retirees over the line? Is someone blaming that cohorts priorities on housing or immigration over the line, wrong, or just exaggerating? Is all that fine so long as bad words are not used?
    The idea that prejudice can be removed from the human experience is one that I find absolutely deranged and comical, but this is consistent with a long history of progressive ideas. In the end all these projects end in tragedy and failure.

    I've mentioned the initiative below a few times, 'prejudice reporting in education', an example of the phenomenon I am raising.


    https://www.prfe.education/

    Indeed. I think the sane view is that *something approaching* an unbiased view of people can only be achieved through continuous self examination.

    Anyone who says “I can’t be biased, I am X/a member of Y” can be presumed to be biased.
    We all have prejudices, and it it examination and acknowledgement of these that allows us to overcome them.

    It needs to be in a supportive culture though, not Maoist Cultural Revolution style self criticism.
    Sadly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
    Some people react with horrified fury at the idea of unconscious bias and if they can be persuaded to take those little tests that purport to identify them, reject them wholeheartedly.

    The issue, I think, is the stigma admitting bias. But if we can get past that and be comfortable with seeing our own biases, it's not the end of the world and it can save us from making embarrassing mistakes.

    One of my biases is around around gender. I suspect it's very common. If I hear certain genderless job names, like "doctor" or "nurse", I have a tendency to picture one gender or the other. Now that I know I do this, I can consciously remember not to carry that assumption forward into saying something stupid. (Of course, I still say many other stupid things).

    I don't blame myself for having those early-learned gendered ideas, and I don't think anyone else should either. But a lot of people are terrified of being seen as having biases and so will avoid doing something about them.
    I think unconscious bias is definitely a thing, as you say it might be around instinctively picturing something, and you probably would not act any differently were that instinct incorrect.

    I do think that the impact of it can be vastly overstated, and there have been some comical examples of advice and training on the subject which seems to me to be likely to have the opposite effect - like the one about not making enough eye contact with some people, which seemed likely to result in people making too much eye contact at people of a specific race, etc, in an effort to overcome it.

    I do think microaggressions are utter bullshit though- far too open to abuse to condemn people for something both slight and unintentional (if even real), and to make people hyper aware and sensitive to see slights where there are none.
    This is where nuance is important. Micro aggressions cross a wide spectrum. There’s a big difference between “so you’re Italian, bet you get cross when people put pineapple on pizza” and “calm down dear” or “let me feel your fuzzy hair”.

    I had a someone at work complain to me that a senior colleague had described him (a Mexican) as South American. On the basis this level of geographical ignorance was borderline racist. I couldn’t get excited by that when most Americans think we live in a country called England and half the world thinks it’s always foggy in London.
    I eat pineapple on pizza and if some Italian tries to stop me you won't see a microaggression from me, I will make war on the whole country. Tanks on the Piazza di Siena. Internment camps, war crimes THE WORKS.
    I had pizza with pineapple in Pisa. And very nice it was too.

    Pizza condemnation should be reserved for those where the base is several inches thick and resembles a stottie cake.
    If you have a piece a pizza in Pisa, you have no reason to expect authenticity. Everyone knows pizza is an American invention and the pineapple version is Canadian. Possibly the only Canadian national dish.
    Poutine. Bannock.
    Poutine is definitively Quebecois. I don't think it's a feature in Winnipeg.

    Bannock is of course Scottish, most famously from Selkirk, but also giving its name to the field where that famous battle took place.
    And should add Pizza Hawaii is the most Canadian thing ever. Invented by a Greek immigrant in Ontario based on his having previously prepared Chinese sweet and sour dishes. We should celebrate the sheer multiculturalism of the concept, even if the dish itself is a bit suspect.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,509

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I like his eclectic posting, blunt and to the point.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,230
    malcolmg said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    How did Sweden survive in that case
    We're not going to rehash the 10,000 posts discussing Sweden are we?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,509
    malcolmg said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I like his eclectic posting, blunt and to the point.
    PS: and often entertaining.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Farooq said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I don't know about that. He's a massive weirdo but he's the most stylish poster on here by a long way, in terms of wordsmithery. A mad poet.
    PB would be less interesting without his Larkin about.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    malcolmg said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    How did Sweden survive in that case
    Far lower population density. Compare Sweden with its neightbours in Norway or even Denmark to see how badly they fared. Then extrapolate that from a population density that is more than 12 times larger.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Malc, has it been a bad year for turnips? You've been getting really mad at everyone and not threatened to throw a single one.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167
    ..

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I’m pretty much 99.9% sure he would spit in the eye of anyone who said he should be awarded it.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,153
    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    Also the creator of a “Utopia” plan so stupid, that his fanboys claim it was satire.
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
    Could you explain my misunderstanding?

    That would be a lengthy discussion, but probably it comes down to some mixture of stupidity and a desire to believe in partisan fantasies.
    ???

    Are you confusing Andys here?

    I am not Andy_JS, and he is not me.

    My stance is that to get that ridiculously small number, you have to only take death certificates that were filled out incorrectly and only state the words Covid-19 on them, rather than the sequence that led to the death of which Covid-19 was the underlying cause.
  • FF43 said:

    ..

    Farooq said:

    TimS said:

    kle4 said:

    Farooq said:

    Foxy said:

    darkage said:

    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I went for a pint in Brexit Central and everybody’s rather bitter

    A wish for sovereignty drove voters in Clacton-on-Sea to Leave. But optimism has given way to anger

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-went-for-a-pint-in-brexit-central-and-everybodys-rather-bitter-mmbnccpcs

    Brexit is a racist endeavour.

    In the Moon and Starfish, a Wetherspoon’s pub on the Clacton seafront, the day drinking crowd were well into their third pints by Thursday lunchtime. When I brought up Brexit, it was viewed with a sense of wasted opportunity, like a football team who had thrown away a two-goal lead.

    “I expected problems from day one. It’s the British way,” said Trevor, 77, a retired commodities trader. “I hoped it would be good, but it hasn’t panned out; the politicians have let us down as usual. Boris is an arsehole. He’s always been an arsehole.”

    “Independence” and “standing on our own two feet” were the most common rationales I heard for Brexit, but, like many in Clacton, Trevor had also hoped that leaving the EU would allow the government to drastically reduce immigration. Clearly, this hasn’t happened. “We need to stop the boats — this country is full,” he said. Then he looked at me. “I’m not being rude to you, but it’s to stop the n*****s coming in.” Right then.
    I hear similar all the time from people of that generation. I’m not racist but….. type stuff. From the Boomer generation who grew up in a white country.

    The question is how different are the Gen Xers and Millennials who have grown up in an increasingly multicultural society? Much more tolerant in the main? If Brexit was primarily about enabling a dying generation to express its racism, then it’s unsustainable.
    One of the things that struck me about the Yorkshire Cricket Club racism scandal is that those involved were considerably younger than me. Ditto police officers who get caught up in such scandals.

    I’m Gen X.
    Anyone thinking that the young are somehow free of prejudice needs to get out into the real world. Look at the misogyny, racism and homophobia we have seen described in many institutions and the people exhibiting these - many of them young. These prejudices just take different forms and get packaged differently. Sexism towards women is quite shocking and often comes from young men against women of all ages, for instance. There are also some pretty unpleasant descriptions of old people by the young - sometimes on this forum.
    Your general point is true, and you can get some strong sexism from a 20 year old bro who knows all the right terms and forms to present as being free from prejudice.

    But I am interested in what you consider over the line in terms of prejudice against the old. Is someone railing against the government reliant on and thus wholly focused on the needs of retirees over the line? Is someone blaming that cohorts priorities on housing or immigration over the line, wrong, or just exaggerating? Is all that fine so long as bad words are not used?
    The idea that prejudice can be removed from the human experience is one that I find absolutely deranged and comical, but this is consistent with a long history of progressive ideas. In the end all these projects end in tragedy and failure.

    I've mentioned the initiative below a few times, 'prejudice reporting in education', an example of the phenomenon I am raising.


    https://www.prfe.education/

    Indeed. I think the sane view is that *something approaching* an unbiased view of people can only be achieved through continuous self examination.

    Anyone who says “I can’t be biased, I am X/a member of Y” can be presumed to be biased.
    We all have prejudices, and it it examination and acknowledgement of these that allows us to overcome them.

    It needs to be in a supportive culture though, not Maoist Cultural Revolution style self criticism.
    Sadly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
    Some people react with horrified fury at the idea of unconscious bias and if they can be persuaded to take those little tests that purport to identify them, reject them wholeheartedly.

    The issue, I think, is the stigma admitting bias. But if we can get past that and be comfortable with seeing our own biases, it's not the end of the world and it can save us from making embarrassing mistakes.

    One of my biases is around around gender. I suspect it's very common. If I hear certain genderless job names, like "doctor" or "nurse", I have a tendency to picture one gender or the other. Now that I know I do this, I can consciously remember not to carry that assumption forward into saying something stupid. (Of course, I still say many other stupid things).

    I don't blame myself for having those early-learned gendered ideas, and I don't think anyone else should either. But a lot of people are terrified of being seen as having biases and so will avoid doing something about them.
    I think unconscious bias is definitely a thing, as you say it might be around instinctively picturing something, and you probably would not act any differently were that instinct incorrect.

    I do think that the impact of it can be vastly overstated, and there have been some comical examples of advice and training on the subject which seems to me to be likely to have the opposite effect - like the one about not making enough eye contact with some people, which seemed likely to result in people making too much eye contact at people of a specific race, etc, in an effort to overcome it.

    I do think microaggressions are utter bullshit though- far too open to abuse to condemn people for something both slight and unintentional (if even real), and to make people hyper aware and sensitive to see slights where there are none.
    This is where nuance is important. Micro aggressions cross a wide spectrum. There’s a big difference between “so you’re Italian, bet you get cross when people put pineapple on pizza” and “calm down dear” or “let me feel your fuzzy hair”.

    I had a someone at work complain to me that a senior colleague had described him (a Mexican) as South American. On the basis this level of geographical ignorance was borderline racist. I couldn’t get excited by that when most Americans think we live in a country called England and half the world thinks it’s always foggy in London.
    I eat pineapple on pizza and if some Italian tries to stop me you won't see a microaggression from me, I will make war on the whole country. Tanks on the Piazza di Siena. Internment camps, war crimes THE WORKS.
    I had pizza with pineapple in Pisa. And very nice it was too.

    Pizza condemnation should be reserved for those where the base is several inches thick and resembles a stottie cake.
    If you have a piece a pizza in Pisa, you have no reason to expect authenticity. Everyone knows pizza is an American invention and the pineapple version is Canadian. Possibly the only Canadian national dish.
    Poutine
    That's what the French call Putin
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    ydoethur said:

    Malc, has it been a bad year for turnips? You've been getting really mad at everyone and not threatened to throw a single one.

    https://www.theguardian.com/food/2023/mar/18/therese-coffeys-eat-turnips-message-leaves-bitter-taste-after-uks-biggest-grower-gives-up
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690
    malcolmg said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I like his eclectic posting, blunt and to the point.
    And usually wrong.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    Chris said:

    kle4 said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    The first lockdown was necessary and proportionate for the surging crisis. I don't think it would have worked without legal measures either, not to get the necessary level of compliance to prevent being overwhelmed. I don't think pre-vaccine we could have coped with loosened arrangements.

    Could some other lockdowns have been avoided or ended sooner, or done on a more urged behaviour than legal threat basis? Possibly.

    Whilst we need to look back on what we did, I do think there is a bit of lockdown remorse going on which is stretching too far from 'Some were not needed/should not have been so long or restrictive' to 'they were not necessary at any time'.
    The first lockdown worked. Infection levels were way down. And then Sunak had his bright idea of Eat Out to Catch Covid and back into lockdown we went.

    Then you had the nonsense tier system with the pubs in Leeds shut and the pubs in York open. Thereby encouraging more travel and more spread.

    There was lots wrong in the government's response to Covid. However, blanket lockdown was the one policy that they got right.
    People going to restaurants wouldn't have spread covid if nobody had it.

    It was allowing covid to be imported again in summer 2020 which was the mistake.
    The stupidity of these comments is absolutely breathtaking.
    Explain why.

    Having at great social and economic cost reduced covid to minimal levels by July 2020 the government then casually allowed foreign holidays to restart to countries with higher levels of covid.

    Unsurprisingly people who went on such holidays were those most likely to both catch it and then subsequently spread it upon their return to the UK.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I don't know about that. He's a massive weirdo but he's the most stylish poster on here by a long way, in terms of wordsmithery. A mad poet.
    PB would be less interesting without his Larkin about.
    And his putting the finger on such things as MoD refusal to install fixed torpedo tubes in a new class of combat ships, and why this is a crap decision, is a very useful contribution to debate.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    Richard you okay mate? You're been very angry this last week, hope everything is actually okay
    Not angry at all. Having a whale of a time. One day you will learn there is a difference between being angry and being intolerent of wilful idiocy.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    Richard you okay mate? You're been very angry this last week, hope everything is actually okay
    Not angry at all. Having a whale of a time. One day you will learn there is a difference between being angry and being intolerent of wilful idiocy.
    Don't know why you've decided to get your bee in a bonnet over me all of a sudden, all I did was checked in on you, get to fuck then if you are going to respond in this way
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,820
    tlg86 said:

    Australia are going to declare soon to get a bowl at England before lunch, right? Right? 🫤

    no because they are not daft
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,491
    .

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
    Could you explain my misunderstanding?

    That would be a lengthy discussion, but probably it comes down to some mixture of stupidity and a desire to believe in partisan fantasies.
    ???

    Are you confusing Andys here?

    I am not Andy_JS, and he is not me.

    My stance is that to get that ridiculously small number, you have to only take death certificates that were filled out incorrectly and only state the words Covid-19 on them, rather than the sequence that led to the death of which Covid-19 was the underlying cause.
    My apologies. I confused Andys.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,959

    Who is Plato?

    She was one of the main posters on here until about 2016. Another one was a bloke called RodCrosby.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,992
    I see it was Gove (I wonder if he's enjoying life with a Lib Dem council) who was the sacrificial Sunday Roast this morning.

    The simple questions are "you've led the Government for more than 13 years, what have you actually done in that time to make people's lives better?" and the follow on "why should we give you five more years to prolong your inertia and failure?". I accept these may be slightly leading questions - it would be nice if any news outlet asked them rather than the simpering guff offered to any Tory on GB News (which will presumably set itself up as the main voice of opposition once Labour are in power).
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037

    .

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    Um - to get that number, you have to discount people who had anything other than a bald one-liner of "Covid-19"

    For example, someone who died from:

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    caused by
    Viral pneumonia
    caused by
    Covid-19

    ... is NOT someone who "died directly from Covid-19", in those criteria. Because it had ARDS and pneumonia on their death certificate.
    And I'm not taking the piss. That's literally what they had to do to get this number. Seriously.

    They've switched to monitoring covid-19 deaths against death certificates, of which more than 80% had covid-19 as the CAUSE of death. That's over 130,000 deaths due to covid-19 (not with "incidental" covid-19, or just happened to push dying people over the edge sort of things) by April 2021*, as the winter wave finally receded.

    I think you've been listening to the Toby Youngs, Ivor Cummins, and the like a bit too much.

    *There are over 220,000 with covid on death certificates as of now, but the proportion dying "of covid" rather than "with covid" did decrease noticeably since the vaccine roll-out, thank God.
    You do not understand how death certificates works.
    Could you explain my misunderstanding?

    That would be a lengthy discussion, but probably it comes down to some mixture of stupidity and a desire to believe in partisan fantasies.
    ???

    Are you confusing Andys here?

    I am not Andy_JS, and he is not me.

    My stance is that to get that ridiculously small number, you have to only take death certificates that were filled out incorrectly and only state the words Covid-19 on them, rather than the sequence that led to the death of which Covid-19 was the underlying cause.
    My apologies. I confused Andys.
    No worries; it's happened before. Probably far easier when Andys are having an argument.
  • MuesliMuesli Posts: 202

    FF43 said:

    ..

    Farooq said:

    TimS said:

    kle4 said:

    Farooq said:

    Foxy said:

    darkage said:

    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I went for a pint in Brexit Central and everybody’s rather bitter

    A wish for sovereignty drove voters in Clacton-on-Sea to Leave. But optimism has given way to anger

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-went-for-a-pint-in-brexit-central-and-everybodys-rather-bitter-mmbnccpcs

    Brexit is a racist endeavour.

    In the Moon and Starfish, a Wetherspoon’s pub on the Clacton seafront, the day drinking crowd were well into their third pints by Thursday lunchtime. When I brought up Brexit, it was viewed with a sense of wasted opportunity, like a football team who had thrown away a two-goal lead.

    “I expected problems from day one. It’s the British way,” said Trevor, 77, a retired commodities trader. “I hoped it would be good, but it hasn’t panned out; the politicians have let us down as usual. Boris is an arsehole. He’s always been an arsehole.”

    “Independence” and “standing on our own two feet” were the most common rationales I heard for Brexit, but, like many in Clacton, Trevor had also hoped that leaving the EU would allow the government to drastically reduce immigration. Clearly, this hasn’t happened. “We need to stop the boats — this country is full,” he said. Then he looked at me. “I’m not being rude to you, but it’s to stop the n*****s coming in.” Right then.
    I hear similar all the time from people of that generation. I’m not racist but….. type stuff. From the Boomer generation who grew up in a white country.

    The question is how different are the Gen Xers and Millennials who have grown up in an increasingly multicultural society? Much more tolerant in the main? If Brexit was primarily about enabling a dying generation to express its racism, then it’s unsustainable.
    One of the things that struck me about the Yorkshire Cricket Club racism scandal is that those involved were considerably younger than me. Ditto police officers who get caught up in such scandals.

    I’m Gen X.
    Anyone thinking that the young are somehow free of prejudice needs to get out into the real world. Look at the misogyny, racism and homophobia we have seen described in many institutions and the people exhibiting these - many of them young. These prejudices just take different forms and get packaged differently. Sexism towards women is quite shocking and often comes from young men against women of all ages, for instance. There are also some pretty unpleasant descriptions of old people by the young - sometimes on this forum.
    Your general point is true, and you can get some strong sexism from a 20 year old bro who knows all the right terms and forms to present as being free from prejudice.

    But I am interested in what you consider over the line in terms of prejudice against the old. Is someone railing against the government reliant on and thus wholly focused on the needs of retirees over the line? Is someone blaming that cohorts priorities on housing or immigration over the line, wrong, or just exaggerating? Is all that fine so long as bad words are not used?
    The idea that prejudice can be removed from the human experience is one that I find absolutely deranged and comical, but this is consistent with a long history of progressive ideas. In the end all these projects end in tragedy and failure.

    I've mentioned the initiative below a few times, 'prejudice reporting in education', an example of the phenomenon I am raising.


    https://www.prfe.education/

    Indeed. I think the sane view is that *something approaching* an unbiased view of people can only be achieved through continuous self examination.

    Anyone who says “I can’t be biased, I am X/a member of Y” can be presumed to be biased.
    We all have prejudices, and it it examination and acknowledgement of these that allows us to overcome them.

    It needs to be in a supportive culture though, not Maoist Cultural Revolution style self criticism.
    Sadly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
    Some people react with horrified fury at the idea of unconscious bias and if they can be persuaded to take those little tests that purport to identify them, reject them wholeheartedly.

    The issue, I think, is the stigma admitting bias. But if we can get past that and be comfortable with seeing our own biases, it's not the end of the world and it can save us from making embarrassing mistakes.

    One of my biases is around around gender. I suspect it's very common. If I hear certain genderless job names, like "doctor" or "nurse", I have a tendency to picture one gender or the other. Now that I know I do this, I can consciously remember not to carry that assumption forward into saying something stupid. (Of course, I still say many other stupid things).

    I don't blame myself for having those early-learned gendered ideas, and I don't think anyone else should either. But a lot of people are terrified of being seen as having biases and so will avoid doing something about them.
    I think unconscious bias is definitely a thing, as you say it might be around instinctively picturing something, and you probably would not act any differently were that instinct incorrect.

    I do think that the impact of it can be vastly overstated, and there have been some comical examples of advice and training on the subject which seems to me to be likely to have the opposite effect - like the one about not making enough eye contact with some people, which seemed likely to result in people making too much eye contact at people of a specific race, etc, in an effort to overcome it.

    I do think microaggressions are utter bullshit though- far too open to abuse to condemn people for something both slight and unintentional (if even real), and to make people hyper aware and sensitive to see slights where there are none.
    This is where nuance is important. Micro aggressions cross a wide spectrum. There’s a big difference between “so you’re Italian, bet you get cross when people put pineapple on pizza” and “calm down dear” or “let me feel your fuzzy hair”.

    I had a someone at work complain to me that a senior colleague had described him (a Mexican) as South American. On the basis this level of geographical ignorance was borderline racist. I couldn’t get excited by that when most Americans think we live in a country called England and half the world thinks it’s always foggy in London.
    I eat pineapple on pizza and if some Italian tries to stop me you won't see a microaggression from me, I will make war on the whole country. Tanks on the Piazza di Siena. Internment camps, war crimes THE WORKS.
    I had pizza with pineapple in Pisa. And very nice it was too.

    Pizza condemnation should be reserved for those where the base is several inches thick and resembles a stottie cake.
    If you have a piece a pizza in Pisa, you have no reason to expect authenticity. Everyone knows pizza is an American invention and the pineapple version is Canadian. Possibly the only Canadian national dish.
    Poutine
    That's what the French call Putin
    Putain would be fitting.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    I was referring to the poster.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    He came in the third year of the syllabus?
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    I'm sure Australia will declare upon reaching 400.

    That after all is the way to play the game these days :wink:
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    Richard you okay mate? You're been very angry this last week, hope everything is actually okay
    Not angry at all. Having a whale of a time. One day you will learn there is a difference between being angry and being intolerent of wilful idiocy.
    I thought you admired Gove?

    *grabs tinfoil hat and ducks*
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,395
    edited June 2023
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/18/honours-row-grows-after-claim-charlotte-owen-worked-as-maternity-cover

    Mm, hadn't realised that the new Baroness Owen got the [edit] peerage for being maternity cover.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,976

    FF43 said:

    ..

    Farooq said:

    TimS said:

    kle4 said:

    Farooq said:

    Foxy said:

    darkage said:

    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I went for a pint in Brexit Central and everybody’s rather bitter

    A wish for sovereignty drove voters in Clacton-on-Sea to Leave. But optimism has given way to anger

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-went-for-a-pint-in-brexit-central-and-everybodys-rather-bitter-mmbnccpcs

    Brexit is a racist endeavour.

    In the Moon and Starfish, a Wetherspoon’s pub on the Clacton seafront, the day drinking crowd were well into their third pints by Thursday lunchtime. When I brought up Brexit, it was viewed with a sense of wasted opportunity, like a football team who had thrown away a two-goal lead.

    “I expected problems from day one. It’s the British way,” said Trevor, 77, a retired commodities trader. “I hoped it would be good, but it hasn’t panned out; the politicians have let us down as usual. Boris is an arsehole. He’s always been an arsehole.”

    “Independence” and “standing on our own two feet” were the most common rationales I heard for Brexit, but, like many in Clacton, Trevor had also hoped that leaving the EU would allow the government to drastically reduce immigration. Clearly, this hasn’t happened. “We need to stop the boats — this country is full,” he said. Then he looked at me. “I’m not being rude to you, but it’s to stop the n*****s coming in.” Right then.
    I hear similar all the time from people of that generation. I’m not racist but….. type stuff. From the Boomer generation who grew up in a white country.

    The question is how different are the Gen Xers and Millennials who have grown up in an increasingly multicultural society? Much more tolerant in the main? If Brexit was primarily about enabling a dying generation to express its racism, then it’s unsustainable.
    One of the things that struck me about the Yorkshire Cricket Club racism scandal is that those involved were considerably younger than me. Ditto police officers who get caught up in such scandals.

    I’m Gen X.
    Anyone thinking that the young are somehow free of prejudice needs to get out into the real world. Look at the misogyny, racism and homophobia we have seen described in many institutions and the people exhibiting these - many of them young. These prejudices just take different forms and get packaged differently. Sexism towards women is quite shocking and often comes from young men against women of all ages, for instance. There are also some pretty unpleasant descriptions of old people by the young - sometimes on this forum.
    Your general point is true, and you can get some strong sexism from a 20 year old bro who knows all the right terms and forms to present as being free from prejudice.

    But I am interested in what you consider over the line in terms of prejudice against the old. Is someone railing against the government reliant on and thus wholly focused on the needs of retirees over the line? Is someone blaming that cohorts priorities on housing or immigration over the line, wrong, or just exaggerating? Is all that fine so long as bad words are not used?
    The idea that prejudice can be removed from the human experience is one that I find absolutely deranged and comical, but this is consistent with a long history of progressive ideas. In the end all these projects end in tragedy and failure.

    I've mentioned the initiative below a few times, 'prejudice reporting in education', an example of the phenomenon I am raising.


    https://www.prfe.education/

    Indeed. I think the sane view is that *something approaching* an unbiased view of people can only be achieved through continuous self examination.

    Anyone who says “I can’t be biased, I am X/a member of Y” can be presumed to be biased.
    We all have prejudices, and it it examination and acknowledgement of these that allows us to overcome them.

    It needs to be in a supportive culture though, not Maoist Cultural Revolution style self criticism.
    Sadly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
    Some people react with horrified fury at the idea of unconscious bias and if they can be persuaded to take those little tests that purport to identify them, reject them wholeheartedly.

    The issue, I think, is the stigma admitting bias. But if we can get past that and be comfortable with seeing our own biases, it's not the end of the world and it can save us from making embarrassing mistakes.

    One of my biases is around around gender. I suspect it's very common. If I hear certain genderless job names, like "doctor" or "nurse", I have a tendency to picture one gender or the other. Now that I know I do this, I can consciously remember not to carry that assumption forward into saying something stupid. (Of course, I still say many other stupid things).

    I don't blame myself for having those early-learned gendered ideas, and I don't think anyone else should either. But a lot of people are terrified of being seen as having biases and so will avoid doing something about them.
    I think unconscious bias is definitely a thing, as you say it might be around instinctively picturing something, and you probably would not act any differently were that instinct incorrect.

    I do think that the impact of it can be vastly overstated, and there have been some comical examples of advice and training on the subject which seems to me to be likely to have the opposite effect - like the one about not making enough eye contact with some people, which seemed likely to result in people making too much eye contact at people of a specific race, etc, in an effort to overcome it.

    I do think microaggressions are utter bullshit though- far too open to abuse to condemn people for something both slight and unintentional (if even real), and to make people hyper aware and sensitive to see slights where there are none.
    This is where nuance is important. Micro aggressions cross a wide spectrum. There’s a big difference between “so you’re Italian, bet you get cross when people put pineapple on pizza” and “calm down dear” or “let me feel your fuzzy hair”.

    I had a someone at work complain to me that a senior colleague had described him (a Mexican) as South American. On the basis this level of geographical ignorance was borderline racist. I couldn’t get excited by that when most Americans think we live in a country called England and half the world thinks it’s always foggy in London.
    I eat pineapple on pizza and if some Italian tries to stop me you won't see a microaggression from me, I will make war on the whole country. Tanks on the Piazza di Siena. Internment camps, war crimes THE WORKS.
    I had pizza with pineapple in Pisa. And very nice it was too.

    Pizza condemnation should be reserved for those where the base is several inches thick and resembles a stottie cake.
    If you have a piece a pizza in Pisa, you have no reason to expect authenticity. Everyone knows pizza is an American invention and the pineapple version is Canadian. Possibly the only Canadian national dish.
    Poutine
    That's what the French call Putin
    This is the correct way to pronounce Putin.


  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653
    stodge said:

    I see it was Gove (I wonder if he's enjoying life with a Lib Dem council) who was the sacrificial Sunday Roast this morning.

    The simple questions are "you've led the Government for more than 13 years, what have you actually done in that time to make people's lives better?" and the follow on "why should we give you five more years to prolong your inertia and failure?". I accept these may be slightly leading questions - it would be nice if any news outlet asked them rather than the simpering guff offered to any Tory on GB News (which will presumably set itself up as the main voice of opposition once Labour are in power).

    It's a tough one for any Western government given the context of slow, apparently interminable, demographic decline, and ongoing climate-related narrowing of our technological options. And even if things get better after four years, it's a near certainty that they won't get better after 13 years.

    Telling people "you continue to enjoy highish living standards in a society where energy is more rationed while fewer and fewer work", strangely, is not a saleable message!
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    stodge said:

    I see it was Gove (I wonder if he's enjoying life with a Lib Dem council) who was the sacrificial Sunday Roast this morning.

    The simple questions are "you've led the Government for more than 13 years, what have you actually done in that time to make people's lives better?" and the follow on "why should we give you five more years to prolong your inertia and failure?". I accept these may be slightly leading questions - it would be nice if any news outlet asked them rather than the simpering guff offered to any Tory on GB News (which will presumably set itself up as the main voice of opposition once Labour are in power).

    The government has done lots to make its core voters lives better - triple lock pensions, higher house values, extra NHS spending.

    But boasting about such things when other groups have suffered is difficult.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Carnyx said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/18/honours-row-grows-after-claim-charlotte-owen-worked-as-maternity-cover

    Mm, hadn't realised that the new Baroness Owen got the [edit] peerage for being maternity cover.

    I was amused by this comment:

    She was in the shadows but was a serious player but never wanted to be in the limelight like so many inferior people.

    Giving the game away...

    Although I wonder how many people thought she was being elevated for reasons linked to maternity?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Foxy said:

    glw said:

    I know the Telegraph is a joke but this reads like a parody.

    The mortgage bomb about to explode under middle-class Britain

    The mercury is rising and so are interest rates: the scene appears to be set for a midsummer nightmare in the mortgage market. With nearly half a million home loan borrowers rolling their fixed-term loans every three months over the course of this year, the ratchet is tightening. As someone wryly pointed out on Twitter recently, “When does your fixed rate end?” has become the new “Have you watched any good box sets recently?” go-to dinner party conversation starter.

    Don’t ask Adam Fraser*, 42, and his wife, who bought their £7 million house in Berkshire in July last year having secured a mortgage in the January. “It was at the tail end of when there were still good deals to be had,” says Fraser. “We passed our affordability test with flying colours and so I had no problem buying at the top of the market.”


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/mortgage-bomb-middle-class-britain/

    If that's the Telegraph's idea of middle class then I must be working class.
    Journalists routintely talk about a middle-class that by any normal definition is usually the upper quintile. This has been the case for as long as I can recall. The very people who journalists think need help are the group that basically needs no help at all and ought to be paying more tax.
    I did laugh at the idea the Telegraph goes to interview these multi-millionaires who we are apparently supposed to feel sympathy for. It does rather explain their current position if this is what they think the country wants to hear.
    Won't no one think of the mega-rich, in desperate need of tax cuts in order to pay £45 000 per year school fees?

    I recall a US commentator arguing in a debate that 250k per year in New York was close to poverty. Those poor people.
    There was this hilarious bit on BBC QT with Richard Burgon and an audience member too:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/question-time-video-man-top-earners-tax-percent-80000-explained-a9213351.html
    Richard Burgon was correct and handled it well.

    Words not often spoken.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,959
    It's not surprising that people in Clacton are bitter, because the politicians haven't made much effort to deliver on their promises.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Ffs, another no ball.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167
    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    Hegel far.

    Apols, that's dreadful.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    If they didn’t tell you who Plato was I’d ask for my money back. Presumably you were filled to the brim with “woke”, Plato being too dead white male. Wouldn’t have happened in my day!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    I'm sure Australia will declare upon reaching 400.

    That after all is the way to play the game these days :wink:

    The way England accelerated they could easily have been bowled out for 450 on the first night. The declaration was funny, but in full light and flat batting track there was no advantage to putting Australia in.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    Hegel far.

    Apols, that's dreadful.
    It is. You should be Locked up.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    DougSeal said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    If they didn’t tell you who Plato was I’d ask for my money back. Presumably you were filled to the brim with “woke”, Plato being too dead white male. Wouldn’t have happened in my day!
    Don't get it
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    Andy_JS said:

    Who is Plato?

    She was one of the main posters on here until about 2016. Another one was a bloke called RodCrosby.
    I do wonder why some PBers disappear.

    Anyone heard from HurstLlama ?

    His twitter account stopped last December:

    https://twitter.com/HurstLlama
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,263
    ydoethur said:

    So if England had had a proper keeper, they would have a first innings lead rather than Aus about to get that.

    Khawaja can taste that double century.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167
    edited June 2023
    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    Hegel far.

    Apols, that's dreadful.
    It is. You should be Locked up.
    I'll see if I can Russell up a better one.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772

    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    Hegel far.

    Apols, that's dreadful.
    It is. You should be Locked up.
    I'll see if I can Russell up a better one.
    I hope so. These are a bit run of the Mill.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,778

    ..

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I’m pretty much 99.9% sure he would spit in the eye of anyone who said he should be awarded it.
    If I ever thought my antinomianistic contributions were considered sufficiently worthy by the bourgeois knicker shitters on here to trouble the PotY selection committee I would never post again.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited June 2023
    Andy_JS said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    I was saying this right from the beginning, and throughout the entire period of the lockdowns. 1,000 people died directly from Covid-19 in the UK, the rest were people who already had conditions. Closing schools was going to do more damage than the virus itself.
    People with conditions are still PEOPLE. They wouldn’t have died were it not for COVID.

    Did anyone say they weren't?
    You are basically saying that. You're not simply saying lockdowns did more damage than they prevented, because you are arbitrarily and without foundation claiming so few people died as a result of covid. You cannot make an honest assessment of the damage when you claim less than 1% of Covid deaths were really Covid deaths.

    No doubt you have some deep conspiracy behind why others would claim more than 1000 people died as a result of Covid. It's so easy to cover up magnifying the facts like that, thank god there are people exposing the deep state who just love upping covid figures from random deaths.

    The good news is if you move to North West Leicestershire there's at least one MP on your side.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137

    Andy_JS said:

    Who is Plato?

    She was one of the main posters on here until about 2016. Another one was a bloke called RodCrosby.
    I do wonder why some PBers disappear.

    Anyone heard from HurstLlama ?

    His twitter account stopped last December:

    https://twitter.com/HurstLlama
    I believe that Plato passed away. Crosby got a permanent ban iirc.

    I've no info on HurstLlama.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,416
    edited June 2023
    Dura_Ace said:

    Every helicopter ever built is vulnerable to MANPAD.

    The Chinese Navy deal for Ka-52K is still on but the PLAAF have cooled their interest due to progress on their Z-10 project.

    They Egyptians like their Nile Crocodiles; so much that the US had to sell them AH-64 (over the objections of Israel) to stop them buying more. Ka-52 has been an export failure though, especially compared to the (deeply flawed) Hind that proceeded it.

    For all those of you who don't speak @Dura_Ace, let me translate

    Every helicopter ever built is vulnerable to MANPAD (shoulder launched missiles that can kill low-flying aircraft).

    The Chinese Navy deal for Ka-52K (a Russian ground attack helicopter) is still on but the PLAAF (People's Liberation Army Airforce - Chinese Army helicopters) have cooled their interest due to progress on their Z-10 project (a Chinese-built helicopter).

    They Egyptians like their Nile Crocodiles ("Crocodile" is an unofficial name for the KA-52 helicopters exported to Egypt); so much that the US had to sell them AH-64 (a famous American ground attack helicopter, codenamed "Apache") over the objections of Israel to stop them buying more. Ka-52 has been an export failure though, especially compared to the deeply flawed Hind ( a famous Soviet-era helicopter and star of 80/90's action films) that proceeded [sic] it.

    Incidentally, Kamov (a Russian design bureau) has an in-house style whereby its helicopters have two sets of contra-rotating rotors co-axially or near co-axially, enabling them to have tailplanes (flat winglets at the back that stick out).
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,049
    malcolmg said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Who is Plato?

    Weird woman on here who went full MAGA shitbird then died.
    Before that she was "Poster of the Year".
    Certainy not something that would ever be awarded to Dura Ace if it was still in existence.
    I like his eclectic posting, blunt and to the point.
    A bit like your good self, Malc.👍

    I too like his posts. Says what he thinks. Doesn’t give a shit either way.

    This place would be poorer without him.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653

    malcolmg said:

    Westie said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65941549

    Michael Gove says sorry over Tory lockdown party video

    What an absolute bunch of twats.

    Has anyone ever denied that Michael Gove is a complete twat?

    More to the point, did anyone at elite level in ANY part of British society BELIEVE all the government crap, served up for the proles and middle groups by white-coated scientists, advising people who WEREN'T chronically ill or in small high-risk groups that they should stay 2 metres away from everyone, and only leave the house to go shopping, and walk around wearing masks, in order to reduce the ever so high risk of spreading the killer lergy?
    Seems quite obvious now that lockdown was a complete and utter waste of time, we should have protected the vulnerable and elderly with proper care and attention as they rightfully deserve and then let the rest of society get on with our lives. I am so angry that I put my life on hold for two years when the Government didn't care.
    Utter nonsense. Infections would have spiralled out of control, the NHS would have been completely overwhelmed and tens of thousands more would have died.

    How did Sweden survive in that case
    Far lower population density. Compare Sweden with its neightbours in Norway or even Denmark to see how badly they fared. Then extrapolate that from a population density that is more than 12 times larger.
    Population density is misleading when thinking about how people live. Australia has 3.5 people per square kilometre, but 90% of them live in cities or large towns. Covid doesn't care about how much of your national territory is vast sparsely populated deserts and mountains ranges. Sweden, Norway, Australia and the UK all have broadly similar urbanisation levels.
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,049
    DougSeal said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    If they didn’t tell you who Plato was I’d ask for my money back. Presumably you were filled to the brim with “woke”, Plato being too dead white male. Wouldn’t have happened in my day!
    Plato inventor of the plate, according to Dave Lister.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167

    Andy_JS said:

    Who is Plato?

    She was one of the main posters on here until about 2016. Another one was a bloke called RodCrosby.
    I do wonder why some PBers disappear.

    Anyone heard from HurstLlama ?

    His twitter account stopped last December:

    https://twitter.com/HurstLlama
    I believe that Plato passed away. Crosby got a permanent ban iirc.

    I've no info on HurstLlama.
    Still posting on Twitter in January.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    Farooq said:

    kle4 said:

    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Foxy said:

    glw said:

    I know the Telegraph is a joke but this reads like a parody.

    The mortgage bomb about to explode under middle-class Britain

    The mercury is rising and so are interest rates: the scene appears to be set for a midsummer nightmare in the mortgage market. With nearly half a million home loan borrowers rolling their fixed-term loans every three months over the course of this year, the ratchet is tightening. As someone wryly pointed out on Twitter recently, “When does your fixed rate end?” has become the new “Have you watched any good box sets recently?” go-to dinner party conversation starter.

    Don’t ask Adam Fraser*, 42, and his wife, who bought their £7 million house in Berkshire in July last year having secured a mortgage in the January. “It was at the tail end of when there were still good deals to be had,” says Fraser. “We passed our affordability test with flying colours and so I had no problem buying at the top of the market.”


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/mortgage-bomb-middle-class-britain/

    If that's the Telegraph's idea of middle class then I must be working class.
    Journalists routintely talk about a middle-class that by any normal definition is usually the upper quintile. This has been the case for as long as I can recall. The very people who journalists think need help are the group that basically needs no help at all and ought to be paying more tax.
    I did laugh at the idea the Telegraph goes to interview these multi-millionaires who we are apparently supposed to feel sympathy for. It does rather explain their current position if this is what they think the country wants to hear.
    Won't no one think of the mega-rich, in desperate need of tax cuts in order to pay £45 000 per year school fees?

    I recall a US commentator arguing in a debate that 250k per year in New York was close to poverty. Those poor people.
    There was this hilarious bit on BBC QT with Richard Burgon and an audience member too:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/question-time-video-man-top-earners-tax-percent-80000-explained-a9213351.html
    Richard Burgon was correct and handled it well.

    Words not often spoken.
    He didn't handle it brilliantly. The host did. She asked the question that turned it around onto the audience member and properly drew out the lie/mistake.

    The audience guy was a fucking idiot. "I earn £80,000 and I'm not in the top 50%". What a moron.
    I said well, not brilliantly - based on the report.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,772
    Again, taking Bairstow out of the equation brings a breakthrough.

    Too late though.

    Fantastic innings by Khawaja.
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,049
    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    He never said he passed !!

    That’s a gag from Dr Who, in case anyone thinks it’s a dog as I like CHB
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,803
    Andy_JS said:

    It's not surprising that people in Clacton are bitter, because the politicians haven't made much effort to deliver on their promises.

    Full employment, pay rises, extra NHS spending and control taken back.

    They've had what they were promised - did anyone believe we would immediately and effortlessly get some socioeconomic paradise with all the country's fundamental issues being solved ?

    Now if the government choses to do something they don't want or is incompetent then that's the fault of the government not with having taken back control.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,167
    Farooq said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who is Plato?

    Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher, a student of Socrates, the teacher of Aristotle, and founder of the Academy, best known as the author of philosophical works of unparalleled influence. What are they teaching people these days?
    I studied Philosophy for two years.
    And you Kant remember who Plato was?
    Hegel far.

    Apols, that's dreadful.
    It is. You should be Locked up.
    I'll see if I can Russell up a better one.
    I hope so. These are a bit run of the Mill.
    I knew eventually Heidegger few people on to make some puns.
    VG.

    Now do Ludwig W.
This discussion has been closed.