Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Has Sunak got his own lockdown secret that he’s trying to hide? – politicalbetting.com

1235

Comments

  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 18,773
    DougSeal said:

    Why would they do that?
    Because people are odd. They may say they want more money spent and a labour givernment, but get to the booth and think that they want to pay less tax.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022

    This is what a complete **** looks like.

    Hopefully Manchester United give him a life ban.
    img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5020679/uploads/editor/nk/5unzj1yx154r.png" alt="" />

    ‘Like’ is not an appropriate reaction to that.

    Deserves to be banned from football grounds for life.

    Alternatively, deserves to have the shit kicked out of him on the way out. The reason football restricted freedom of expression inside grounds, was because it regularly led to violence.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,272

    This is what a complete **** looks like.

    Hopefully Manchester United give him a life ban.



    Scum.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478
    edited June 2023

    This is what a complete **** looks like.

    Hopefully Manchester United give him a life ban.


    I have got no idea what that means, or why it is bad.

    edit: ah, is it a reference to Hillsborough?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 18,773

    I have got no idea what that means, or why it is bad.
    Hillsborough. 97 Liverpool fans died.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022

    I have got no idea what that means, or why it is bad.

    edit: ah, is it a reference to Hillsborough?
    Yes, Hillsborough reference.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    HYUFD said:

    1970 was the bigger surprise, Heath won outright with a clear majority when Labour led most election polls. Feb 1974 less so as it was a hung parliament and the Tories won the popular vote
    I was a Liberal counting agent in 1970, sitting next to a friend who was doing the same job for Labour. He had an early tiny radio and kept giving us increasingly despondent news, only cheering up when a Labour gain from our side was announced!
    It was the Liberal candidate’s birthday the day the results were announced; he lost his deposit and wondered aloud, after the victorious Conservative had said nice things about him, that for a moment he thought he was going to contribute to his fund!
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478

    Hillsborough. 97 Liverpool fans died.
    Thanks.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,718

    This is what a complete **** looks like.

    Hopefully Manchester United give him a life ban.



    He was disappointed with the size of Blair's majority?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718

    And yet the correlation (if it exists) is not seen in more successful economies.
    This should be something where we can look at the evidence.

    So: did capital investment (or gross capital formation as it's called in the national accounts) drop post 2004?

    Is there a correlation between immigration from Eastern Europe and productivity growth?

    How much are changes in headline productivity due to changes in the proportion of the country in work?

    Etc
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,773

    This is what a complete **** looks like.

    Hopefully Manchester United give him a life ban.



    That's absolutely vile.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023
    A
    pigeon said:

    To be fair, British trains have an excellent safety record. Doubtless aided by the fact that, owing to endless rounds of both engineering works and strikes, they are increasingly incapable of carrying any passengers at all.
    Hmmmm

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Great_Britain_1995_to_date#/media/File:GBR_rail_passengers_by_year_1830-2015.png
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    edited June 2023
    Deleted, duplicate
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    pigeon said:

    To be fair, British trains have an excellent safety record. Doubtless aided by the fact that, owing to endless rounds of both engineering works and strikes, they are increasingly incapable of carrying any passengers at all.
    Can’t have an accident if the train never leaves the depot. Taps head
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 30,486
    Andy_JS said:

    New blog post by Dom Cummings.

    "The Startup Party: reflections on the last 20 years, what could replace the Tories, and why
    And building a Q&A on Brexit, what really happened in No10, covid etc
    DOMINIC CUMMINGS"

    https://dominiccummings.substack.com/p/the-startup-party-reflections-on

    I've read it now but I'm not sure I follow.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,929
    2-1 to City

    League and Cup Double!
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718

    He was disappointed with the size of Blair's majority?
    That was what I assumed!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364
    edited June 2023

    I was a Liberal counting agent in 1970, sitting next to a friend who was doing the same job for Labour. He had an early tiny radio and kept giving us increasingly despondent news, only cheering up when a Labour gain from our side was announced!
    It was the Liberal candidate’s birthday the day the results were announced; he lost his deposit and wondered aloud, after the victorious Conservative had said nice things about him, that for a moment he thought he was going to contribute
    Of course in Feb 1974 Heath started talks with Thorpe's Liberals to try and stay in power. Heath and Cameron were the most recent Tory leaders closest to the average Liberal I think
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478

    Can’t have an accident if the train never leaves the depot. Taps head
    It's a shame that passenger levels are pretty much back to pre-Covid levels then. All those passengers and the trains that never leave the depots ... ;)
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,491

    Britain's newest train station, opened last Saturday. Pics by yours truly last Tuesday:







    You're a bit late. All the important people were there days ago... :smiley:
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364
    City do the double then
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761

    It's a shame that passenger levels are pretty much back to pre-Covid levels then. All those passengers and the trains that never leave the depots ... ;)
    The French are delighted we’re helping to them build their new TGV lines.
  • MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,763

    Immigration has improved productivity, as most studies confirm. It allowed firms to access skills more readily and allow greater specialisation. I certainly saw this in my own industry. There are other disincentives to capital investment, some noted in the article.

    The car wash story much beloved on here is seen around the world, not just a British story born of immigration-driven stagnation. It seems like it has more to do with the desire for a bespoke service from consumers on one hand, and a easy-access service industry for immigrants (see also hospitality) on the other, than any productivity metaphor.

    I don’t think the computing challenge holds much water, either, at least not as expressed. The counter factual is, what?, de-computerisation? Good luck with that.
    Doesn't being able to import the ready skilled mean you deprive the unskilled within the UK the chance of being 'skilled'? The locals loose potential jobs in education/training and the actual skilled occupation. A little like the gulf arabs importing all the skilled professions but without their trillion barrels of social security.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023

    I have got no idea what that means, or why it is bad.

    edit: ah, is it a reference to Hillsborough?
    If it is, the wearer would be eligible to join Sein Fein. Kingsmill “jokes” on the anniversary.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    HYUFD said:

    Of course in 1970 Heath started talks with Thorpe's Liberals to try and stay in power. Heath and Cameron were the most recent Tory leaders closest to the average Liberal I think
    No, didn’t need to. You’re thinking of Feb 74. My Liberal Association was one of those which sent a message to Thorpe telling him to have nothing to do with it.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,929
    viewcode said:

    You're a bit late. All the important people were there days ago... :smiley:
    But of those only *I* post on PB :)
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,811

    Well, hopefully you'll be getting *six* new stations near you next year:
    https://www.northumberlandline.uk/

    But I bet you'll find a reason to whinge about that.
    A very broad interpretation of "near"!

    We will have White Rose here in West Yorkshire. Sort of new, but actually a replacement for Cottingley. Much to the delight of the commuters who bought the new houses next to Cottingley station.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    rcs1000 said:

    This should be something where we can look at the evidence.

    So: did capital investment (or gross capital formation as it's called in the national accounts) drop post 2004?

    Is there a correlation between immigration from Eastern Europe and productivity growth?

    How much are changes in headline productivity due to changes in the proportion of the country in work?

    Etc
    Having spoken with people running companies who now bitterly complain about being forced to “waste” money on investing in labour saving machinery…. I know what I would put my money on.

    Simple example - a relative bought an electric mini digger from JCB using the Sunak tax writeoffs for investment.

    It does the work of half a dozen people and costs (including capital cost write down) less than 2.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718

    Having spoken with people running companies who now bitterly complain about being forced to “waste” money on investing in labour saving machinery…. I know what I would put my money on.

    Simple example - a relative bought an electric mini digger from JCB using the Sunak tax writeoffs for investment.

    It does the work of half a dozen people and costs (including capital cost write down) less than 2.
    It's also worth remembering that our flexible labour market discourages capital investment.

    If I buy a machine, I've committed to that cost (depreciation) for a long time. If I hire someone, I can easily let them go.

    By contrast, in a country without a flexible labour market investing in automation makes much more sense. If you can't get rid of the person, then it makes machinery that bit more attractive.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364
    edited June 2023

    No, didn’t need to. You’re thinking of Feb 74. My Liberal Association was one of those which sent a message to Thorpe telling him to have nothing to do with it.
    Heath did of course win the popular vote in Feb 74 and a majority of seats in England so arguably would have had a mandate. Heath would have needed Ulster Unionist as well as Liberal support to stay UK PM however.

    1974 was also pre SDP joining the LDs so the Liberals were more classically liberal than they became, certainly until Clegg and the Coalition
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 5,173

    Hmmmm

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Great_Britain_1995_to_date#/media/File:GBR_rail_passengers_by_year_1830-2015.png
    I was, of course, expressing my frustration and despondency with how desperately unreliable the trains are, rather than being entirely literal.

    Anybody who has to rely on trains knows the following:

    1. Train journeys always go wrong - whether the train is hot and overcrowded, very late, both of those things, or simply cancelled altogether
    2. The train companies, whose thinking is still stuck fifty years in the past, keep digging up the tracks at the weekends, so that their pitiful services are often unavailable altogether when you want to use them (and no, substituting the train for a hot nasty bus that takes three, four or five times as long to get where you are going as the actual train would've done doesn't count as availability)
    3. The train unions, whose thinking is also stuck fifty years in the past, believe that they can somehow secure their futures by holding customers to ransom and getting them to blame their misery on the Government - when, in fact, trains have now been like this for so long that every time the railway fails its passengers yet again, another chunk of them abandon it permanently for their cars

    I'm frankly amazed that trains still have as many users left as they do, although granted a large fraction of the survivors will be the likes of yours truly who's not the most co-ordinated individual ever and is a bit afraid to learn to drive. Nonetheless, you have to wonder how long public support for the massive subsidies needed to keep the railways afloat will continue, given that they're the very definition of a self-centred, rotten monopoly that treats the people who use them like shit.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,229
    edited June 2023

    Doesn't being able to import the ready skilled mean you deprive the unskilled within the UK the chance of being 'skilled'? The locals loose potential jobs in education/training and the actual skilled occupation. A little like the gulf arabs importing all the skilled professions but without their trillion barrels of social security.
    No. The studies suggest that, in aggregate, British workers were elevated into more senior roles. Incoming migrants allowed British workers to “step up”.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718
    So: here's Gross Capital Formation in the UK, and what's striking is how much capital investment had fallen off from the levels of the mid-1980s:



    (The dip in the late 2000s is the GFC, so I wouldn't read too much into that.)
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478

    A very broad interpretation of "near"!

    We will have White Rose here in West Yorkshire. Sort of new, but actually a replacement for Cottingley. Much to the delight of the commuters who bought the new houses next to Cottingley station.
    Apologies - I thought you were further northeast than that. My point still stands though: there is lots if investment going into rail outside the southeast (for another biggie, look at the reopening of the Okehampton line).

    Incidentally, it looks as though the new EWR line from Bedford to Cambridge hasn't stalled, and the latest route alterations have just been announced.

    https://eastwestrail.co.uk/the-project/bedford-to-cambridge

    In typical joined-up thinking (not), this will be right beside the A428 dual carriageway they're just about to start building - though they are not doing any enabling works as part of the road...
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023
    rcs1000 said:

    It's also worth remembering that our flexible labour market discourages capital investment.

    If I buy a machine, I've committed to that cost (depreciation) for a long time. If I hire someone, I can easily let them go.

    By contrast, in a country without a flexible labour market investing in automation makes much more sense. If you can't get rid of the person, then it makes machinery that bit more attractive.
    Machinery hire is a well established business…
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718
    On the subject of capital investment, here's the chart for Germany:


  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,024
    edited June 2023
    Two things when you're talking about national productivity: 1) the numerator should be output (GDP) when resources are fully employed else you are confounding with cyclical effects; 2) it should be total factor productivity else you are falsely ascribing increased output arising from changes in capital intensity to labour productivity. All of this means your analysis is to do with the long run and the relevant concept is the Solow residual which is assumed to measure technological change.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,730
    HYUFD said:

    Heath did of course win the popular vote in Feb 74 and a majority of seats in England so arguably would have had a mandate.

    1974 was also pre SDP joining the LDs so the Liberals were more classically liberal than they became, certainly until Clegg and the Coalition
    I don't think that this characterisation is correct. That ship sailed with Asquith.

    By the 70s, to the extent they had an economic policy, it was between Labour and Tory but not as pro-union as Labour. With the caveat that, being notionally committed to increased redistribution of wealth through land and property taxes and anti-landlord policies, it would look quite left-wing today.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718
    Re Germany vs the UK: one would have expected Germany to have higher levels of capex, simply because it is a much more industrial country. Nevertheless, it is striking how much capex has grown there in the last five years, even as it has become the preferred location for Eastern European migration.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,229
    edited June 2023
    European and other migrant labour into hospitality presumably didn’t do much for productivity.

    But it sure as hell improved the food offer in Britain, to the extent that London became one of the best cities on Earth to dine. And while that might have remained an “elite” experience, it trickled down across the country.

    Something similar happened in the Arts.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718

    Machinery hire is a well established business…
    Sure: but that's a well established business for construction, not so much manufacturing.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478

    The French are delighted we’re helping to them build their new TGV lines.
    The UK treasury are delighted at all the moolah French and Dutch companies have given them on loss-making franchises... ;)

    (The franchisees have to pay the treasury a certain amount of money in order to run the services. This is a lump sum, not a percentage. If the franchisee does not get enough income, they still have to pay all the money.)
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022
    edited June 2023
    rcs1000 said:

    Re Germany vs the UK: one would have expected Germany to have higher levels of capex, simply because it is a much more industrial country. Nevertheless, it is striking how much capex has grown there in the last five years, even as it has become the preferred location for Eastern European migration.

    A difference in attitude compared to UK companies. German industry is traditionally more capital-intensive, and British industry much more labour-intensive.
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 5,173

    Apologies - I thought you were further northeast than that. My point still stands though: there is lots if investment going into rail outside the southeast (for another biggie, look at the reopening of the Okehampton line).

    Incidentally, it looks as though the new EWR line from Bedford to Cambridge hasn't stalled, and the latest route alterations have just been announced.

    https://eastwestrail.co.uk/the-project/bedford-to-cambridge

    In typical joined-up thinking (not), this will be right beside the A428 dual carriageway they're just about to start building - though they are not doing any enabling works as part of the road...
    Would anyone like to bet - given the appalling record of this country in actioning infrastructure projects, and the undoubted hypersonic wave of screaming to come from legions of Nimbies all along the route - whether this will (a) ever get built at all, and (b) if it does, whether it'll be operational this side of 2050?
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,229

    Having spoken with people running companies who now bitterly complain about being forced to “waste” money on investing in labour saving machinery…. I know what I would put my money on.

    Simple example - a relative bought an electric mini digger from JCB using the Sunak tax writeoffs for investment.

    It does the work of half a dozen people and costs (including capital cost write down) less than 2.
    You have to ask yourself why.

    In your anecdote, your relative is overwhelmingly better off buying the digger, regardless of labour availability or flexibility.

    So what’s the actual incentive - or even psychology - here?
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,229
    Sandpit said:

    A difference in attitude compared to UK companies. German industry is traditionally more capital-intensive, and British industry much more labour-intensive.
    But this is a “Just So” story, and moreover fails to explain the steep drop off in the mid-80s.
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559

    No, didn’t need to. You’re thinking of Feb 74. My Liberal Association was one of those which sent a message to Thorpe telling him to have nothing to do with it.
    Expecting acknowledgement re: your correction? Do NOT hold your breath!
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    EPG said:

    I don't think that this characterisation is correct. That ship sailed with Asquith.

    By the 70s, to the extent they had an economic policy, it was between Labour and Tory but not as pro-union as Labour. With the caveat that, being notionally committed to increased redistribution of wealth through land and property taxes and anti-landlord policies, it would look quite left-wing today.
    That’s about right.
    From one who was actively involved, and is feeling somewhat ‘homeless’ at the moment.
  • MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,763

    No. The studies suggest that, in aggregate, British workers were elevated into more senior roles. Incoming migrants allowed British workers to “step up”.
    Did the studies look at the long term impact such as the next generation of potential employees? I can imagine a front loading benefit to those already in roles but not for those yet to have them.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364
    EPG said:

    I don't think that this characterisation is correct. That ship sailed with Asquith.

    By the 70s, to the extent they had an economic policy, it was between Labour and Tory but not as pro-union as Labour. With the caveat that, being notionally committed to increased redistribution of wealth through land and property taxes and anti-landlord policies, it would look quite left-wing today.
    Thorpe was economicaly certainly closer to Heath's Tories than Wilson's Labour, especially in relation to the unions which was a key issue in 1974. Heath was also more pro EEC than Wilson's Labour was in those days so closer to the Liberals on that too
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,718
    Sandpit said:

    A difference in attitude compared to UK companies. German industry is traditionally more capital-intensive, and British industry much more labour-intensive.
    I think a lot of this is related to the structure of our economics: Germany is a manufacturing economy, and we're a services one.

    But it also shows how difficult teasing out underlying causes is.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,730
    HYUFD said:

    Thorpe was economicaly certainly closer to Heath's Tories than Wilson's Labour, especially in relation to the unions which was a key issue in 1974. Heath was also more pro EEC than Wilson's Labour was in those days so closer to the Liberals on that too
    Economically closer with a rent freeze and a land value tax?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478
    pigeon said:

    Would anyone like to bet - given the appalling record of this country in actioning infrastructure projects, and the undoubted hypersonic wave of screaming to come from legions of Nimbies all along the route - whether this will (a) ever get built at all, and (b) if it does, whether it'll be operational this side of 2050?
    I wouldn't bet on it, but it may (and I hope it does).

    But it's odd: it's not always the case. The Okehampton line took just a few years to reopen to passengers, and that was in a poor state. The Northumberland Line is also quick; it will hopefully be about five years from being seriously considered to opening (though both projects had been looked into before at various levels).

    True, these are both reopenings of mothballed lines; but it does show that it can be done in a timely manner.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    HYUFD said:

    Thorpe was economicaly certainly closer to Heath's Tories than Wilson's Labour, especially in relation to the unions which was a key issue in 1974. Heath was also more pro EEC than Wilson's Labour was in those days so closer to the Liberals on that too
    The key issue, as defined by the Conservatives was ‘Who Rules Britain?’ Heath had picked a fight and was losing it.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364
    EPG said:

    Economically closer with a rent freeze and a land value tax?
    The Feb 1974 Liberal manifesto included limits on rises in average earnings to control inflation, they also opposed the extent of Labour tax increases and Heath was more of an EEC enthusiast as mentioned like the Liberals than Wilson was
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,773
    edited June 2023
    It's already been announced that the Covid Inquiry doesn't expect to finish hearing evidence until 2026.

    So if the Government does have to supply WhatsApp messages etc, when would they actually be made public?

    If it's when the Inquiry reports it's so long into the future that it basically doesn't matter.

    Or would they be published as evidence which Ministers would then be questioned on when they give their evidence?

    https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/news/inquiry-update-new-investigations-announced/
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364

    The key issue, as defined by the Conservatives was ‘Who Rules Britain?’ Heath had picked a fight and was losing it.
    Though had it been 'Who Governs England?' Heath would have won as he won a majority of seats in England. In terms of the popular vote Heath also won more votes in Britain than Wilson, even if not more seats
  • jamesdoylejamesdoyle Posts: 802
    DavidL said:

    Scum.
    That is appalling
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,620

    European and other migrant labour into hospitality presumably didn’t do much for productivity.

    But it sure as hell improved the food offer in Britain, to the extent that London became one of the best cities on Earth to dine. And while that might have remained an “elite” experience, it trickled down across the country.

    Something similar happened in the Arts.

    The words 'restaurant', 'cafe' and 'bistro' had to be imported ...
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,684
    HYUFD said:

    Though had it been 'Who Governs England?' Heath would have won as he won a majority of seats in England. In terms of the popular vote Heath also won more votes in Britain than Wilson, even if not more seats
    Oh come on; both Scots and Welsh nationalism were nowhere near as significant as they are today.
    As I said, Heath had picked a fight and was losing it. The election was the last throw of an increasingly desperate man.
    And there were significant pro-European voices in Labour.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,620
    edited June 2023

    Oh come on; both Scots and Welsh nationalism were nowhere near as significant as they are today.
    As I said, Heath had picked a fight and was losing it. The election was the last throw of an increasingly desperate man.
    And there were significant pro-European voices in Labour.
    [Edit] Also to the point, the strikes were GB-wide. Lots of miners in Scotland and Wales. (Not sure what was happening in NI, other than the Troubles.)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,364

    Oh come on; both Scots and Welsh nationalism were nowhere near as significant as they are today.
    As I said, Heath had picked a fight and was losing it. The election was the last throw of an increasingly desperate man.
    And there were significant pro-European voices in Labour.
    Heath did nonetheless win the popular vote, the only party leader to win the UK popular vote but still lose the general election since 1945 other than Attlee in 1951
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023

    You have to ask yourself why.

    In your anecdote, your relative is overwhelmingly better off buying the digger, regardless of labour availability or flexibility.

    So what’s the actual incentive - or even psychology - here?
    The psychology of many other people in the building business is that they have a right to nearly unlimited amounts of cheap, low skilled labour for simple tasks. Dig holes. Lift stuff etc.

    They see the idea of investing in equipment as weird and "not how we do things".

    My relative, who has a background outside construction, has pointed out that owning the conveyors for basement digs out (for example) rapidly breaks even, if you are even doing a few jobs a year. But large numbers of builders prefer to pay double to rent, or try and do without!
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 31,047
    DavidL said:

    And King David sending someone off to die in the front line so he could shag his wife.
    Oh, and a mass drowning of the entire known world.
    Let's not even get started on the heaving bossoms in Song of Solomon.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023
    Carnyx said:

    The words 'restaurant', 'cafe' and 'bistro' had to be imported ...
    One entertaining thing was immigrants of various backgrounds taking over greasy spoons. People didn't tell them they were supposed to use crap ingredients. And thus the high quality version of the English Breakfast was born. Using sausages that aren't Offal Fat Tubes....
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 31,047
    MikeL said:

    It's already been announced that the Covid Inquiry doesn't expect to finish hearing evidence until 2026.

    So if the Government does have to supply WhatsApp messages etc, when would they actually be made public?

    If it's when the Inquiry reports it's so long into the future that it basically doesn't matter.

    Or would they be published as evidence which Ministers would then be questioned on when they give their evidence?

    https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/news/inquiry-update-new-investigations-announced/

    I'm hoping that they get entrusted to the safekeeping of Isabel Oakeshot.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 55,111

    That is appalling
    He's been arrested apparently.

    https://twitter.com/MetPoliceEvents/status/1665029777676173320
  • pm215pm215 Posts: 1,259


    But it's odd: it's not always the case. The Okehampton line took just a few years to reopen to passengers, and that was in a poor state. The Northumberland Line is also quick; it will hopefully be about five years from being seriously considered to opening (though both projects had been looked into before at various levels).

    True, these are both reopenings of mothballed lines; but it does show that it can be done in a timely manner.

    I think it's a lot easier to get a reopening or a run-passenger-traffic-on-freight-only change through -- there's a whole category of "yes, but it should go on a different route that coincidentally doesn't go past my back garden" objections they avoid. It's noticeable that the parts of East-West Rail that have happened already are the "upgrade existing line" parts, the ones currently in progress are "relay track on existing alignment" and the parts still bogged down in consultation hell are the ones where new routeing is proposed.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,579

    He's been arrested apparently.

    https://twitter.com/MetPoliceEvents/status/1665029777676173320
    Presumably he’ll say it’s about Liverpool getting 97 points and not winning the league (and before the 97th Hillsborough death), but it’s this season’s kit, so that doesn’t really wash.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,855
    Well.

    The Cabinet Office has warned Boris Johnson it will pull public funding for his legal advice for the Covid inquiry if he “undermines the government’s position” or releases evidence without permission.

    Government lawyers wrote to Johnson last week saying money would “cease to be available” if he broke any of their conditions.

    These include the requirement to co-operate with any “reasonable” demand and to send them his witness statements and any requested documents for pre-approval and redaction before they are submitted to the inquiry.

    The advice puts the former prime minister on a collision course with officials, with experts suggesting that he may have already breached some of its provisions.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-covid-inquiry-funding-cut-k03r96mws
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761

    The UK treasury are delighted at all the moolah French and Dutch companies have given them on loss-making franchises... ;)

    (The franchisees have to pay the treasury a certain amount of money in order to run the services. This is a lump sum, not a percentage. If the franchisee does not get enough income, they still have to pay all the money.)
    That's why we keep bailing them out. Con artists.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,511

    He's been arrested apparently.

    https://twitter.com/MetPoliceEvents/status/1665029777676173320
    The guy is an idiot, but arresting people for poor taste is rather too harsh for my liking. A copper should tell him to put a jacket on and stop being a dickhead, and no more.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030

    He's been arrested apparently.

    https://twitter.com/MetPoliceEvents/status/1665029777676173320
    We need to get rid of these stupid laws frankly, yes it is offensive but giving offence should not be a crime. Else we are up shit creek
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    Pagan2 said:

    We need to get rid of these stupid laws frankly, yes it is offensive but giving offence should not be a crime. Else we are up shit creek
    Interesting how cancel culture here is fine.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 55,111
    tlg86 said:

    Presumably he’ll say it’s about Liverpool getting 97 points and not winning the league (and before the 97th Hillsborough death), but it’s this season’s kit, so that doesn’t really wash.
    He could be a Labour supporter who thinks the 1997 landslide was not enough.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,511

    One entertaining thing was immigrants of various backgrounds taking over greasy spoons. People didn't tell them they were supposed to use crap ingredients. And thus the high quality version of the English Breakfast was born. Using sausages that aren't Offal Fat Tubes....
    Bloody immigrants coming over here and improving our diet...
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030

    Interesting how cancel culture here is fine.
    Who am I cancelling, the trouble with laws like this is who judges whether someone gives offence. Was the shirt offensive certainly.....the trouble with things like offence is it only tends to ratchet towards more authoritarian judgements.....how long before it is an offence to have bare arms because some are offended or tattoos or piercings....I can guarantee almost anything people say or wear there will be someone offended.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,579

    Interesting how cancel culture here is fine.
    Fine with who? Scousers?

    A bit like that Grenfell bonfire thing, I don’t think the police should get involved.

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,730
    You could construe the message as being "Liverpool supporters ought to be killed". Public intimidation, in a place where the target group is congregated, very much falls under public order offences.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030
    EPG said:

    You could construe the message as being "Liverpool supporters ought to be killed". Public intimidation, in a place where the target group is congregated, very much falls under public order offences.

    But it shouldnt. Want to arrest david attenborough because he is a director of the optimum population trust and thinks that there are too many humans? That also implies he thinks there needs to be a culling.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    Pagan2 said:

    Who am I cancelling, the trouble with laws like this is who judges whether someone gives offence. Was the shirt offensive certainly.....the trouble with things like offence is it only tends to ratchet towards more authoritarian judgements.....how long before it is an offence to have bare arms because some are offended or tattoos or piercings....I can guarantee almost anything people say or wear there will be someone offended.
    FFS I was agreeing with you, you are so blinkered.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    tlg86 said:

    Fine with who? Scousers?

    A bit like that Grenfell bonfire thing, I don’t think the police should get involved.

    But I am saying this is "acceptable" cancel culture according to some who have posted on this board. They pick and choose.

    Cancel culture doesn't actually exist, is the summary.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030

    FFS I was agreeing with you, you are so blinkered.
    Apologies then I didnt pick up on the fact you agreed, it sounded more like you were accusing me of cancelling.
  • CorrectHorseBatCorrectHorseBat Posts: 1,761
    Pagan2 said:

    Apologies then I didnt pick up on the fact you agreed, it sounded more like you were accusing me of cancelling.
    No you thought I was disagreeing with you because you oppose me politically.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030

    But I am saying this is "acceptable" cancel culture according to some who have posted on this board. They pick and choose.

    Cancel culture doesn't actually exist, is the summary.
    Cancel culture obviously does exist else they wouldn't have been arrested. I do agree with you that he should not have been.
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    Foxy said:

    The guy is an idiot, but arresting people for poor taste is rather too harsh for my liking. A copper should tell him to put a jacket on and stop being a dickhead, and no more.
    Pretty brave, mind. It's mere cowardice, not good taste, that would rule out me wearing that.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,750
    tlg86 said:

    Fine with who? Scousers?

    A bit like that Grenfell bonfire thing, I don’t think the police should get involved.

    It's not fine. It's a public order offence. It's clearly a provocation of violence. Even before "cancel culture" entered the vocabulary you couldn't go round saying or displaying things that could provoke violence. This, for example, from the Public Order Act 1986 -

    4 Fear or provocation of violence.

    (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
    (a)uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or

    (b)distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked. (emphasis mine)

    Some things you can't say.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,462
    edited June 2023

    But I am saying this is "acceptable" cancel culture according to some who have posted on this board. They pick and choose.

    Cancel culture doesn't actually exist, is the summary.
    Cancel culture definitely exists - hence a number of people being cancelled.

    It’s just that “offensive to the point of cancelling” is an Irregular Verb. I am Speaking Truth, you should be quiet and he/she needs to be cancelled…
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030
    DougSeal said:

    It's not fine. It's a public order offence. It's clearly a provocation of violence. Even before "cancel culture" entered the vocabulary you couldn't go round saying or displaying things that could provoke violence. This, for example, from the Public Order Act 1986 -

    4 Fear or provocation of violence.

    (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
    (a)uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or

    (b)distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked. (emphasis mine)

    Some things you can't say.
    That law is crap and patently so....I am a person I find people wearing clothes to be intimidating and abusive because god made us in her own image (as an example). Should therefore all clothes wearers be arrested. It is like too many of our laws, where the "victim" gets to define it as a crime and the police act on it. This is just supression of free speech by fuckwits
  • TimSTimS Posts: 15,160
    edited June 2023
    Foxy said:

    Bloody immigrants coming over here and improving our diet...
    I’ve become increasingly radicalised on immigration (and emigration). It’s now one of if not the most important issues for us and a host of other countries over the coming decades.

    Countries with high levels of immigration have historically been more economically dynamic, more artistically creative, better at sport, better at cuisine, more attractive as tourist destinations. I struggle to think of an exception. Perhaps Brazil and Argentina, which have squandered their melting pot demographics to become rather stagnant? But otherwise: the USA, Germany, UK, France, Netherlands, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Mauritius, Dubai. All punch way above their weight economically, culturally and sportingly. And Hong Kong - the perfect example of what happens when inward migration and its associated dynamism die.

    Populations are going to start shrinking and ageing at an eye watering pace. Ethno states like China, Japan and Korea and most of Eastern Europe will just wither on the vine for lack of immigrants. They are selling out their futures for ethnic purity.

    If we can encourage emigration of our elderly to sunnier climes at the same time, all the better.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,579
    It’s this season’s kit, so he’s had it done post the 97 death. Had he got it done in 2019, it would have been moderately amusing as I don’t think anyone could complain.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,579
    DougSeal said:

    It's not fine. It's a public order offence. It's clearly a provocation of violence. Even before "cancel culture" entered the vocabulary you couldn't go round saying or displaying things that could provoke violence. This, for example, from the Public Order Act 1986 -

    4 Fear or provocation of violence.

    (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
    (a)uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or

    (b)distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked. (emphasis mine)

    Some things you can't say.
    Interesting one for the lawyers as he will argue it’s about the points not the deaths. I think that’s rubbish, but could be tricky to get a conviction.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,921
    edited June 2023
    DougSeal said:

    It's not fine. It's a public order offence. It's clearly a provocation of violence. Even before "cancel culture" entered the vocabulary you couldn't go round saying or displaying things that could provoke violence. This, for example, from the Public Order Act 1986 -

    4 Fear or provocation of violence.

    (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
    (a)uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or

    (b)distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked. (emphasis mine)

    Some things you can't say.
    I can see that the first bolded part would apply, but not the second.

    Passing comment that not enough fans died at Hillsborough is hardly calling for more to be killed now, much less "immediately".
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,921
    What about "The only good X is a dead X". Does that meet the threshold?
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,030
    tlg86 said:

    It’s this season’s kit, so he’s had it done post the 97 death. Had he got it done in 2019, it would have been moderately amusing as I don’t think anyone could complain.
    For all we know he had a shirt then and just keeps updating for the current kit....who knows and this is why laws like this are stupid.

    They are also stupid for the fact that they are defined because others may use unlawful violence or behaviour.....strangely that is sort of like saying the rape victim deserved it because they went out in sexy clothing in my view which is also patently wrong.
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855

    Well.

    The Cabinet Office has warned Boris Johnson it will pull public funding for his legal advice for the Covid inquiry if he “undermines the government’s position” or releases evidence without permission.

    Government lawyers wrote to Johnson last week saying money would “cease to be available” if he broke any of their conditions.

    These include the requirement to co-operate with any “reasonable” demand and to send them his witness statements and any requested documents for pre-approval and redaction before they are submitted to the inquiry.

    The advice puts the former prime minister on a collision course with officials, with experts suggesting that he may have already breached some of its provisions.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-covid-inquiry-funding-cut-k03r96mws

    That is utterly utterly extraordinary. It's like the eu rule saying you forfeit your pension if you criticise The Project. The worst bit of political controlling behaviour since Blair's heyday.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,855

    NEW THREAD

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,478

    That's why we keep bailing them out. Con artists.
    Did you actually read what I wrote?
This discussion has been closed.