Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
I'm sorry but is the United Kingdom going to be hidebound to a party that got 21% of the vote in the last Northern Ireland election and 244,128 at the last general election. Now you might say there are other unionists voices too who may actually be more hardline than the DUP on the Protocol. Fine, then why aren't they part of the conversation too?
Yes we are because…reasons…
We are, because everyone involved (Ireland, north, south, U.K. gov, Irish gov) signed up to the Good Friday deal.
This explicitly and carefully gave a veto to the largest party on each side of The Divide in Northern Ireland.
This apparently was AOK when SF wanted to halt the peace process because some officious police officer was investigating murders too enthusiastically or whatever.
The Unionist leaders were supposed, it seems , to deliver their parties consent to whatever SF needed. And get not much for it.
Now the DUP have wised up and are playing the same game as SF - Give us what we want, fuck over the others and if you don’t, there may be accidents.
Lord Trimble warned about this a decade back. He was told to shut up for his trouble.
1) advertise for face-eating leopards. 2) hire some face-eating leopards. 3) reward the most enthusiastically face-eating leopards. 4) congratulate them on their face eating 5) give the leopards who don’t eat faces nothing. 6) wonder why you are up to your nuts in face-eating leopards.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came - Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses …— Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
…addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me …— Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
“Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it”
“It’s clear that the scientists who claimed in Lancet, on Feb 19, 2020, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” were misrepresenting their unfounded opinion as a scientific fact.”
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came.— Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses … — Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
… addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me … — Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
It's all been gone over before of course - stricter rules are relatively popular in abstract, but the measures are disproportionate the problem they are supposed to address and less attention has been paid a more easily manipulated area, and even though there are mitigations for those without standard IDs, it all seems like a lot of effort for not much gain.
Officials have worked very hard to make sure people know, but millions will still have no clue, and that could well include lots of elderly Tories.
The party is going to be whalloped in May and I doubt this will help. Sunak will survive, if the Boris faction are unable to capitalise on NI in advance.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
At a party I was at last night Ash Regan was being described as Salmond's representative on earth. They seem genuinely close so this would be no surprise. Of course Regan winning would be.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came - Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses …— Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
…addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me …— Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
With that sort of attitude, it's a wonder you ever got out of the water in the first place, never mind evolved to become a seal.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came.— Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses … — Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
… addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me … — Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
Problem with going on about political issues all the time is you start to see its themes and even precise comments in everything. I've been reading some Arthur C Clarke short stories today, and for two in a row published in 1954 there were statements I felt sure I'd read on PB very recently.
On the world ending, in No Morning After
It would be the best thing that could possibly happen. Yes, it would save a whole lot of misery. No one would have to worry about the Russians and the atom bomb and the high cost of living.
On taxation policy, in Armaments Race
There's a British film industy?
Sure there is. It's in a very flourishing condition too. The government piles on an entertainments tax that drives it to bankruptcy, then keeps it alive with whacking big grants. That's the way we do things in this country.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
At a party I was at last night Ash Regan was being described as Salmond's representative on earth. They seem genuinely close so this would be no surprise. Of course Regan winning would be.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Forbes now 11/10 with Hills. 4/1 only a few day ago. She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
Do I understand correctly that Steve Baker is expected to resign?
It does look like about 100-150 Conservative MPs, the bulk of them ERG, could vote against any deal which extends ECJ jurisdiction to Great Britain and Steve Baker would leave the Government, maybe Braverman and Raab too
Big prediction. That would end the Rishi premiership.
It wouldn't provided 200 Tory MPs still voted for the deal and backed Rishi.
For Starmer has said Labour will vote with the Government to pass the NI deal and 200 Tory MPs behind him is sufficient for Rishi to defeat the likely VONC that would follow in his leadership
He should make a vote for his deal a vote of confidence. "If you don't support the government you lose the whip and any chance of standing as a Tory MP at the next election." Would that work?
Despite a slight PR tinge of let's humanise Shapps, this inspires the weird sensation of thinking well of him. He also has a pilot's licence I believe, I hope this doesn't cause Dura Ace too much pain.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
At a party I was at last night Ash Regan was being described as Salmond's representative on earth. They seem genuinely close so this would be no surprise. Of course Regan winning would be.
Cat fight between her and Tasmina then..
But Tasmina, like Salmond himself, is no longer at Holyrood.
Is there anything this government hasn't screwed up?
Classic example of a cure for which there is no known disease, isn't it?
Once you figure out that everything they do is for themselves and their donors rather than for the country it all makes a lot more sense.
If this government stays on current course the same millions of little old ladies who queued up early and often to save us from Corbyn in 2017 will be queuing up, fumbling for their bus passes and co-op cards, to vote SKS and friends in.
Do I understand correctly that Steve Baker is expected to resign?
It does look like about 100-150 Conservative MPs, the bulk of them ERG, could vote against any deal which extends ECJ jurisdiction to Great Britain and Steve Baker would leave the Government, maybe Braverman and Raab too
Big prediction. That would end the Rishi premiership.
It wouldn't provided 200 Tory MPs still voted for the deal and backed Rishi.
For Starmer has said Labour will vote with the Government to pass the NI deal and 200 Tory MPs behind him is sufficient for Rishi to defeat the likely VONC that would follow in his leadership
He should make a vote for his deal a vote of confidence. "If you don't support the government you lose the whip and any chance of standing as a Tory MP at the next election." Would that work?
Probably, but at what cost?
As the reselection rumblings are showing, the Conservative Party at large still pines for Boris- both the man and the politics he represents. That's obviously insane, but there you go. To remove the whip from those who don't back the government is technically possible, and might not kill Rishi's ability to get stuff through the Commons. But the response from the Conservative movement would be a terrible thing to see.
(It's why Boris got away with the deselection tactic in 2019- he was doing what the Spirit Of The Party wanted. Major just about got away with a limited form of the same and May couldn't dare, because then it would have gone against the grain of the party.)
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Forbes now 11/10 with Hills. 4/1 only a few day ago. She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
Yikes, bit of a disparity. I assume all voters, so Yousaf might argue he gets a poor rating from people who want less able candidates to take over instead of him. Or they have far more DKs?
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
And that Kari Lake really did win in Arizona, although in fairness he did reverse quicker than an Italian tank with that prediction.
Hey, until her final legal case finishes she might yet be declared the winner! (She won't, apparentely she isn't even submitting evidence at the appeals, not sure how she even is allowed to file).
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Forbes now 11/10 with Hills. 4/1 only a few day ago. She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
Ordained by God?
I think you will find that one the things that the Pope and KF agree on is that she can't be ordained.
I am interested in how the Wee Frees see her on the Kinder, Küche, Kirche front.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
I think that is not their overall approval ratings but their net ratings for how they performed as Ministers. How Useless got as high a net score as -16 is a fairly profound mystery.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Forbes now 11/10 with Hills. 4/1 only a few day ago. She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
As in the one with the most potential 'x factor' and electoral appeal? - I agree based on what I've seen (although that's not a great deal). Interesting if she does get the gig. I view the SNP as progressive left of centre (more so than Labour in many ways tbh) but when I analyse why, it's because of Sturgeon. If she's replaced by a leader with conservative values it's bound to change the party. Seems to create more space for SLAB, but whether this is good for them depends on what they do in the space. Hopefully it'll be a funky groove not dad dancing.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
The Lord of the Rings isn't a trilogy. It's a single book in three volumes.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
Despite a slight PR tinge of let's humanise Shapps, this inspires the weird sensation of thinking well of him. He also has a pilot's licence I believe, I hope this doesn't cause Dura Ace too much pain.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
And that Kari Lake really did win in Arizona, although in fairness he did reverse quicker than an Italian tank with that prediction.
Hey, until her final legal case finishes she might yet be declared the winner! (She won't, apparentely she isn't even submitting evidence at the appeals, not sure how she even is allowed to file).
One sort of hopes she wins (I don't) because Leon reversed his prediction. That would be quite a record to predict both a win and a loss and get it wrong both times.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
Looking like a 2 horse race, isn't it, and could be close. Wish you had a slightly stronger candidate from the progressive/left side of the party to vote for. Ah well.
Forbes now 11/10 with Hills. 4/1 only a few day ago. She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
Ordained by God?
I think you will find that one the things that the Pope and KF agree on is that she can't be ordained.
I am interested in how the Wee Frees see her on the Kinder, Küche, Kirche front.
Their beliefs dont make them correct though, perhaps God has a different view?
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
That's such a worrying opening sentence. I am lost.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
That's such a worrying opening sentence. I am lost.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
A minor politician can square a circle.
An expert politician can cube multi-dimensional spheres, while juggling priceless eggs in variable gravity.
Similar to what happened in England v Ireland last season. Surprisingly, England made a game of it for nearly 70 minutes before succumbing to the inevitable.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
That's such a worrying opening sentence. I am lost.
Have some smelling salts and answer the question.
Listen without prejudice to ideas for improving this country that I love? Of course. Always.
Oh no! Even Brexit's better than that. In fact Brexit is good as long as we focus on how best to mitigate the mistake rather than why we made it in the first place. The latter just brings out the same old defence lines from Leavers.
The Remain campaign was too negative. Mrs May's fabulous compromise was torpedoed by Remainer MPs. Or alternatively Mrs May WAS a Remainer hence couldn't do Brexit properly as witnessed by her shit deal. Then somebody - and it's not always Morris - will track further back and start to mutter about the 'Lisbon Treaty'.
Etc. Common theme - Brexit is the fault of the people who opposed it. The song never changes, neither tune nor lyrics, and it's not a classic - so best to leave it in the sleeve imo.
I actually agree with @kinabalu largely here. It would be good if we can get past old Brexit arguments and speak a lot more about positive future changes. I am also willing to listen without prejudice to future changes that involve [compromises with / a closer relationship with] ROEU. But in return, are you prepared to listen without prejudice to solutions and future changes that involve further divergence from ROEU, or programmes and initiatives that are only possible outside the EU? This question goes to all of our fervent remainer friends.
That's such a worrying opening sentence. I am lost.
My advice is to change you name and take ship on a tramp steamer to Singapore.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
A minor politician can square a circle.
An expert politician can cube multi-dimensional spheres, while juggling priceless eggs in variable gravity.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
A minor politician can square a circle.
An expert politician can cube multi-dimensional spheres, while juggling priceless eggs in variable gravity.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
'But asked whether she’d readmit Mr Salmond, she said: “If people want to join the SNP they are free to do that.”'
*Do* the Tories do well out of postal voting? Admittedly thus is two decades out of date, but my recollection is that when compulsory postal voting was introduced for the European elections about 2003 ish in certain regions, Labour did disproportionately well in those regions. The Tories may get more postal hotes than Labour, but it does not follow from that that a crackdown on postal vote fraud would disproportuonately harm the Tories. We have no way of knowing what proportion of dodgy postal votes (DPVs) favour which party, though the anecdata suggests DPVs are most prevalent in heavily Labour areas like Towr Hamlets.
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
'But asked whether she’d readmit Mr Salmond, she said: “If people want to join the SNP they are free to do that.”'
Thanks.
Hmm.
Well, that's a far cry from the headline, but it was still rather a foolish thing to say. She could have said something about processes needing to be followed for any member expelled after bringing the party into disrepute and shut it down straight away.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concludeFWId that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Two US government agencies think on balance Covid likely originated in a lab leak. This one (Department of Energy) with "low confidence". Five other agencies think it had natural causes.
FWIW I think with moderate confidence, but strictly on the evidence such as it is, think it had natural causes. I have more confidence in this than I had on a similar analysis that Saddam Hussein had no significant weapons of mass destruction.
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
And that Kari Lake really did win in Arizona, although in fairness he did reverse quicker than an Italian tank with that prediction.
Hey, until her final legal case finishes she might yet be declared the winner! (She won't, apparentely she isn't even submitting evidence at the appeals, not sure how she even is allowed to file).
One sort of hopes she wins (I don't) because Leon reversed his prediction. That would be quite a record to predict both a win and a loss and get it wrong both times.
1. I never made any prediction 2. I was - by a vast distance - the first pb-er to say OOH look there’s a woman called Kari Lake and she’s interesting 3. The only betting call I made was “bet on her opponent Hobbs at 5/1” when it was clearly a close two horse race - and that came good
“Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it”
“It’s clear that the scientists who claimed in Lancet, on Feb 19, 2020, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” were misrepresenting their unfounded opinion as a scientific fact.”
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concludeFWId that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Two US government agencies think on balance Covid likely originated in a lab leak. This one (Department of Energy) with "low confidence". Five other agencies think it had natural causes.
FWIW I think with moderate confidence, but strictly on the evidence such as it is, think it had natural causes. I have more confidence in this than I had on a similar analysis that Saddam Hussein had no significant weapons of mass destruction.
Yes, but you’re an idiot
If it wasn’t for me this site would still be blindly following the natural origin came-from-the-market bollocks, and decrying any doubters as “racist conspirators”
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
And that Kari Lake really did win in Arizona, although in fairness he did reverse quicker than an Italian tank with that prediction.
Hey, until her final legal case finishes she might yet be declared the winner! (She won't, apparentely she isn't even submitting evidence at the appeals, not sure how she even is allowed to file).
One sort of hopes she wins (I don't) because Leon reversed his prediction. That would be quite a record to predict both a win and a loss and get it wrong both times.
1. I never made any prediction 2. I was - by a vast distance - the first pb-er to say OOH look there’s a woman called Kari Lake and she’s interesting 3. The only betting call I made was “bet on her opponent Hobbs at 5/1” when it was clearly a close two horse race - and that came good
“Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it”
“It’s clear that the scientists who claimed in Lancet, on Feb 19, 2020, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” were misrepresenting their unfounded opinion as a scientific fact.”
Jeremy Farrar, ex head of the Wellcome Trust, signed that absolutely fraudulent and mendacious Lancet letter. He knew it was a pack of lies
Why isn’t he on trial?
Meh, "natural" can cover all sorts of stuff though.
Farrar signed a letter coordinated and composed by peter Daszak, Co-head of virological research at the Wuhan lab, a letter which claimed the signatories had “no conflict of interest” and never mentioned these links to the Wuhan lab. Many other signatories had similar undisclosed links
Farrar knew all this. And signed anyway
Moreover, he signed this email about 5 days after he disclosed in private emails that he was “50/50” on lab leak and in which described the low level biosecurity at Wuhan as “Wild West”
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concludeFWId that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Two US government agencies think on balance Covid likely originated in a lab leak. This one (Department of Energy) with "low confidence". Five other agencies think it had natural causes.
FWIW I think with moderate confidence, but strictly on the evidence such as it is, think it had natural causes. I have more confidence in this than I had on a similar analysis that Saddam Hussein had no significant weapons of mass destruction.
And you believe that this extraordinary natural event, resulting in a deadly and transmissible coronavirus with 'a unique furin cleavage site' happened yards from a laboratory studying how to make Coronaviruses more deadly and more transmissible by altering the furin cleavage site. I don't think you do believe that. I don't think anyone capable of rational thought believes it. I think you're maintaining a polite if ludicrous pretense because you feel beholden to adopting a stance supportive to the USA.
Unionist parties, especially the SCons, are praying for Yousaf to win the SNP leadership.
Not only would he lose lots of SNP seats at the next UK general election, he would likely be beaten by Sarwar to the FM role at the next Holyrood election too
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
And that Kari Lake really did win in Arizona, although in fairness he did reverse quicker than an Italian tank with that prediction.
Hey, until her final legal case finishes she might yet be declared the winner! (She won't, apparentely she isn't even submitting evidence at the appeals, not sure how she even is allowed to file).
One sort of hopes she wins (I don't) because Leon reversed his prediction. That would be quite a record to predict both a win and a loss and get it wrong both times.
1. I never made any prediction 2. I was - by a vast distance - the first pb-er to say OOH look there’s a woman called Kari Lake and she’s interesting 3. The only betting call I made was “bet on her opponent Hobbs at 5/1” when it was clearly a close two horse race - and that came good
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came - Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses …— Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
…addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me …— Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
The Book of Common Prayer is the definitive service book for Anglicans, if it is good enough for the King's church that is definitive
The Leon Singularity gets ever closer. The dread day that PB realizes, with a congealing sense of horror, that Leondamus was RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
“The Energy Department has concludeFWId that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
Two US government agencies think on balance Covid likely originated in a lab leak. This one (Department of Energy) with "low confidence". Five other agencies think it had natural causes.
FWIW I think with moderate confidence, but strictly on the evidence such as it is, think it had natural causes. I have more confidence in this than I had on a similar analysis that Saddam Hussein had no significant weapons of mass destruction.
And you believe that this extraordinary natural event, resulting in a deadly and transmissible coronavirus with 'a unique furin cleavage site' happened yards from a laboratory studying how to make Coronaviruses more deadly and more transmissible by altering the furin cleavage site. I don't think you do believe that. I don't think anyone capable of rational thought believes it. I think you're maintaining a polite if ludicrous pretense because you feel beholden to adopting a stance supportive to the USA.
Yes I don’t think anyone with a brain any longer believes “it came from the market”
Tho I wouldn’t ascribe @FF43’s opinion to “America-philia” - I’d say he’s not intellectually confident, not overly smart, and therefore scared of admitting error
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
'But asked whether she’d readmit Mr Salmond, she said: “If people want to join the SNP they are free to do that.”'
Media really have it in for her, they much prefer a patsy and are under handlers orders to ensure Useless gets an easy ride ( no pun or inference intended)
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
LOL the bigoted liars are out yet again, jealous that Alex could charm women , dear dear.
Third. Like the last book in a trilogy. A trilogy being where the quote “The Ring was made in the fires of Mount Doom; only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor and cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came” appears.
Er, one wouldn't say 'to whither' (unless one was a bloody owl of course).
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
Let them be whipp'd through every market town till they come to Berwick, from whence they came - Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 2, 1592
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses …— Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
…addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me …— Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
The Book of Common Prayer is the definitive service book for Anglicans, if it is good enough for the King's church that is definitive
A remarkable criterion on [edit] which to decide English style and grammar. Because Henry VIII and Edward VI.
Tell me, do you write your s's like fs without the cross-bar, or use a goose feather for a pen? Come to think of it, how can you possibly enter your comments on PB using one?
Not quite what she said needless to say but she should have shut that down at the outset.
How would she square resigning over the GRA 'negatively affecting the dignity and safety of women and girls' with letting a self-confessed sexual predator into the SNP? She must have been misquoted, surely?
LOL the bigoted liars are out yet again, jealous that Alex could charm women , dear dear.
If he'd charmed them there wouldn't have been a problem.
Comments
Labour: 300-400 seats
Tories 100-275 seats
Lib Dems: 20+ seats
Greens: 1 seat
Reform: 0 seats
SNP: 30-45 seats
Likewise one wouldn't say 'from whence', unless it was necessary for euphony [edit] or stress.
This explicitly and carefully gave a veto to the largest party on each side of The Divide in Northern Ireland.
This apparently was AOK when SF wanted to halt the peace process because some officious police officer was investigating murders too enthusiastically or whatever.
The Unionist leaders were supposed, it seems , to deliver their parties consent to whatever SF needed. And get not much for it.
Now the DUP have wised up and are playing the same game as SF - Give us what we want, fuck over the others and if you don’t, there may be accidents.
Lord Trimble warned about this a decade back. He was told to shut up for his trouble.
1) advertise for face-eating leopards.
2) hire some face-eating leopards.
3) reward the most enthusiastically face-eating leopards.
4) congratulate them on their face eating
5) give the leopards who don’t eat faces nothing.
6) wonder why you are up to your nuts in face-eating leopards.
“The Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a lab leak, according to a classified intelligence report wsj.com/articles/covid… via @WSJ”
https://twitter.com/danielnasaw/status/1629840256877965312?s=61&t=raLL5JKfj_BYke5HoVBiYw
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/26/politics/ron-desantis-supported-ukraine-russia-kfile/index.html
A traitor to the West.
Sunak and Starmer Similarities/Differences (23 February):
Majorities of British voters think Sunak and Starmer are different from each other in terms of their...
Personalities (67%)
Policies (59%)
Upbringings (59%)
Principles & Values (59%)
Professional experiences (52%)
---
Sunak vs Starmer on policy:
A majority of voters think Sunak and Starmer have similar policies on Ukraine (56%)
44% think they have similar policies on the pandemic and relations with the United States.
59% think they have different policies on the NHS and taxation.
https://twitter.com/RedfieldWilton/status/1629844361201451008
… Sittingbourne, from whence we had a famous pair of horses …— Jane Austen, letter, 24 Oct. 1798
…addressed to this place, from whence it will be forwarded to me …— Lord Byron, letter, 31 Aug. 1809
If it’s good enough for Shakespeare, Byron, Austen, Tolkien and The Book of Common Prayer, then it’s good enough for me.
How much do Britons think a new Government led by Keir Starmer would change the current Government’s policies? (23 February)
A significant amount 29%
A fair amount 42%
A slight amount 17%
Nothing at all 12%
“Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it”
“It’s clear that the scientists who claimed in Lancet, on Feb 19, 2020, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” were misrepresenting their unfounded opinion as a scientific fact.”
https://twitter.com/shellenbergermd/status/1629849975449608192?s=61&t=raLL5JKfj_BYke5HoVBiYw
Jeremy Farrar, ex head of the Wellcome Trust, signed that absolutely fraudulent and mendacious Lancet letter. He knew it was a pack of lies
Why isn’t he on trial?
Officials have worked very hard to make sure people know, but millions will still have no clue, and that could well include lots of elderly Tories.
The party is going to be whalloped in May and I doubt this will help. Sunak will survive, if the Boris faction are unable to capitalise on NI in advance.
https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/843780/view/acanthostega-and-ichthyostega-tetrapods-illustration
On the world ending, in No Morning After
It would be the best thing that could possibly happen. Yes, it would save a whole lot of misery. No one would have to worry about the Russians and the atom bomb and the high cost of living.
On taxation policy, in Armaments Race
There's a British film industy?
Sure there is. It's in a very flourishing condition too. The government piles on an entertainments tax that drives it to bankruptcy, then keeps it alive with whacking big grants. That's the way we do things in this country.
Now all we have to do is have is have it confirmed that Truss surprised o the upside and your reputation is sealed.
She is the one out of the three who looks like a winner.
"If you don't support the government you lose the whip and any chance of standing as a Tory MP at the next election."
Would that work?
He also has a pilot's licence I believe, I hope this doesn't cause Dura Ace too much pain.
https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1629853013207597059?s=20
https://www.thesocialreview.co.uk/2023/02/26/two-become-one-how-mergers-affect-the-trade-union-movement/
https://twitter.com/SundayTimesSco/status/1629792244109651968
As the reselection rumblings are showing, the Conservative Party at large still pines for Boris- both the man and the politics he represents. That's obviously insane, but there you go. To remove the whip from those who don't back the government is technically possible, and might not kill Rishi's ability to get stuff through the Commons. But the response from the Conservative movement would be a terrible thing to see.
(It's why Boris got away with the deselection tactic in 2019- he was doing what the Spirit Of The Party wanted. Major just about got away with a limited form of the same and May couldn't dare, because then it would have gone against the grain of the party.)
https://twitter.com/grdecter/status/1629853251045654530?s=61&t=YPx0lQ3gzAMlA-LCfpcksQ
I am interested in how the Wee Frees see her on the Kinder, Küche, Kirche front.
Laters.
An expert politician can cube multi-dimensional spheres, while juggling priceless eggs in variable gravity.
That’s worse than the first one
The Tories may get more postal hotes than Labour, but it does not follow from that that a crackdown on postal vote fraud would disproportuonately harm the Tories. We have no way of knowing what proportion of dodgy postal votes (DPVs) favour which party, though the anecdata suggests DPVs are most prevalent in heavily Labour areas like Towr Hamlets.
Hmm.
Well, that's a far cry from the headline, but it was still rather a foolish thing to say. She could have said something about processes needing to be followed for any member expelled after bringing the party into disrepute and shut it down straight away.
Without saying 'no' categorically.
FWIW I think with moderate confidence, but strictly on the evidence such as it is, think it had natural causes. I have more confidence in this than I had on a similar analysis that Saddam Hussein had no significant weapons of mass destruction.
2. I was - by a vast distance - the first pb-er to say OOH look there’s a woman called Kari Lake and she’s interesting
3. The only betting call I made was “bet on her opponent Hobbs at 5/1” when it was clearly a close two horse race - and that came good
Otherwise, a brilliant point
If it wasn’t for me this site would still be blindly following the natural origin came-from-the-market bollocks, and decrying any doubters as “racist conspirators”
Farrar knew all this. And signed anyway
Moreover, he signed this email about 5 days after he disclosed in private emails that he was “50/50” on lab leak and in which described the low level biosecurity at Wuhan as “Wild West”
What is the point in arguing this?
Not only would he lose lots of SNP seats at the next UK general election, he would likely be beaten by Sarwar to the FM role at the next Holyrood election too
Tho I wouldn’t ascribe @FF43’s opinion to “America-philia” - I’d say he’s not intellectually confident, not overly smart, and therefore scared of admitting error
NI deal announced in the next hour, BBC say. Then details tomorrow.
Tell me, do you write your s's like fs without the cross-bar, or use a goose feather for a pen? Come to think of it, how can you possibly enter your comments on PB using one?