Rishi should have touched on climate change – politicalbetting.com
Sunak gets a lot of coverage in the papers this morning for his first big speech of year setting out his thoughts on the main themes that no doubt will run until the general election.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
Agreed, this morning we are getting 42% from renewables and 21% from nuclear. It is a remarkable success that will shortly get even better as 2 of the largest offshore windfarms in the world come on line. This looked like a very expensive investment by the UK which threatened our remaining heavy energy use businesses with excessive costs but given the current price of gas we got lucky.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
Agreed, this morning we are getting 42% from renewables and 21% from nuclear. It is a remarkable success that will shortly get even better as 2 of the largest offshore windfarms in the world come on line. This looked like a very expensive investment by the UK which threatened our remaining heavy energy use businesses with excessive costs but given the current price of gas we got lucky.
although of course, we will be losing most of our nuclear in the very near future.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
Yes we have done well and we have come a long long way but nothing will ever be enough to appease the fanatics and from the way the story is covered in the media you would think we had done nothing.
Between a book and TV series I am not sure that young Harry has quite mastered the premise of a private life for his family.
He claims there was blood, he was terrified and he called his therapist. I mean, really. He comes across as such a wet lettuce.
That’s an insult to wet lettuces. Hopefully, after this week, everyone will just ignore the pair of them, and let them have the privacy they say they wanted.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
The Coronation is going to be popcorn time for the people watchers.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
Agreed, this morning we are getting 42% from renewables and 21% from nuclear. It is a remarkable success that will shortly get even better as 2 of the largest offshore windfarms in the world come on line. This looked like a very expensive investment by the UK which threatened our remaining heavy energy use businesses with excessive costs but given the current price of gas we got lucky.
although of course, we will be losing most of our nuclear in the very near future.
We have commissioned Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C but both at least 10 years too late, and there's a gap for a 3rd and possibly a 4th too.
Between a book and TV series I am not sure that young Harry has quite mastered the premise of a private life for his family.
He claims there was blood, he was terrified and he called his therapist. I mean, really. He comes across as such a wet lettuce.
That’s an insult to wet lettuces. Hopefully, after this week, everyone will just ignore the pair of them, and let them have the privacy they say they wanted.
It is all unutterably sad, if the story is true or even if it is false. Now the accusation is public, it will be even harder for the relationship between the brothers to be healed. Harry will know that; I wonder if he cares.
I'm guessing the palace will have to respond, even if it is in a "recollections may vary" way.
I'd also guess that this book is pretty much the end of it; all Harry's ammunition will have used. Communications between the royals and Harry will be muted and careful, as it's obvious that anything they say or do may be spun against them.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Everything costs, but money invested in renewables insulates us from energy shocks like the one that we're in now. Oh, and the 'fuel' is free forever. It is a global issue and it isn't one we are solving alone, just look at the stats for China's renewables and the USA's Inflation Reduction Act. We should continue to do our bit out of enlightened self interest.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
Not as though Harry is exactly small and weak either.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
I disagree with you. The government is constantly and noisily attacked by people claiming to be green-inclined, stating that the government is not doing enough, or even anything. The truth is they have done blooming well in decarbonising since 2010 (building on earlier good work by Labour, although early wins are always easier).
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
The only quibble I have with this post is the first sentence. You are not disagreeing with me!
Between a book and TV series I am not sure that young Harry has quite mastered the premise of a private life for his family.
Also I’ve got to say the allegation of William physically pushing him over doesn’t ring true (whereas I can believe him losing his cool and shouting - more in the “oh FFS!”’frustratedmode)
It really annoys me when people try to undermine wind power by saying we burn gas when the wind doesn’t blow. Whereas it’s genuinely remarkable that on a windy day we no longer have to burn gas.
Of course he should have mentioned the climate. We should be investing to develop, build and export solar, wind and tidal. Building the kit, installing the lagoons and wind/solar farms here, exporting in bulk to foreign customers, and exporting surplus clean power via the interconnectors for a profit. We should be registering then subsiding companies lagging lofts, installing roof panels and heat pumps.
But we won't do any of those things. Because paying the Chinese government a vast mark-up for nuclear power which may come on line in a decade gives us a weapon to taunt Keir Starmer with.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Everything costs, but money invested in renewables insulates us from energy shocks like the one that we're in now. Oh, and the 'fuel' is free forever. It is a global issue and it isn't one we are solving alone, just look at the stats for China's renewables and the USA's Inflation Reduction Act. We should continue to do our bit out of enlightened self interest.
I agree with all that. But it shouldn’t be one of 5 or 6 pledges as it doesn’t really impact on people’s day to day & the activists will complain no matter what the government does
It really annoys me when people try to undermine wind power by saying we burn gas when the wind doesn’t blow. Whereas it’s genuinely remarkable that on a windy day we no longer have to burn gas.
Yeah, it's bizarre. It surely is a good thing to burn half as much gas, even if it has to be used the other half of the time.
Of course he should have mentioned the climate. We should be investing to develop, build and export solar, wind and tidal. Building the kit, installing the lagoons and wind/solar farms here, exporting in bulk to foreign customers, and exporting surplus clean power via the interconnectors for a profit. We should be registering then subsiding companies lagging lofts, installing roof panels and heat pumps.
But we won't do any of those things. Because paying the Chinese government a vast mark-up for nuclear power which may come on line in a decade gives us a weapon to taunt Keir Starmer with.
Apparently the confrontation escalated because William called Meghan Markle “difficult, rude, and abrasive.”
That's the way she comes across to me, even if she is 100% correct in everything she says.
And she isn't.
You pals with them then, she comes across as your average bigheaded , think they are special actress. Good old William he is not a wimp after all , rahter it is the big butch soldier boy who is Mr Wimpy.
Of course he should have mentioned the climate. We should be investing to develop, build and export solar, wind and tidal. Building the kit, installing the lagoons and wind/solar farms here, exporting in bulk to foreign customers, and exporting surplus clean power via the interconnectors for a profit. We should be registering then subsiding companies lagging lofts, installing roof panels and heat pumps.
But we won't do any of those things. Because paying the Chinese government a vast mark-up for nuclear power which may come on line in a decade gives us a weapon to taunt Keir Starmer with.
Not as one of 5 pledges
To encourage the Tory voter, they should have pledged to put boat people to work on a series of giant treadmills. They can tramp around all day to generate clean electricity, then be fed supermarket leftovers. Mealtimes supervised by the local residents association where the local Hefe screams "MORE????" at them when they complain they are hungry / dying.
Apparently the confrontation escalated because William called Meghan Markle “difficult, rude, and abrasive.”
That's the way she comes across to me, even if she is 100% correct in everything she says.
And she isn't.
You pals with them then, she comes across as your average bigheaded , think they are special actress. Good old William he is not a wimp after all , rahter it is the big butch soldier boy who is Mr Wimpy.
I think he meant, 'and she isn't 100% correct in everything she says.'
I was thinking if she tires of the public spotlight she has a fabulous career ahead of her at OFSTED on that basis.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
The Coronation is going to be popcorn time for the people watchers.
I have booked a holiday abroad and will ignore the whole thing, as I did with the Queen's funeral.
The royal family is farcical and I don't like gawping at their entitled nonsense.
Give me real people watching. Sitting in cafes, chatting in shops, exchanging conversations with people on walks. Real people, real lives.
In other news, the Kiwis are chugging along on Day 4 at 3 runs an over. They might yet go on to win the game but the contrast with the McCullum-Stokes revolution is so stark.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
The Coronation is going to be popcorn time for the people watchers.
I have booked a holiday abroad and will ignore the whole thing, as I did with the Queen's funeral.
The royal family is farcical and I don't like gawping at their entitled nonsense.
Give me real people watching. Sitting in cafes, chatting in shops, exchanging conversations with people on walks. Real people, real lives.
You mean you don't have a subscription to Hello magazine. I'm shocked.
Apparently the confrontation escalated because William called Meghan Markle “difficult, rude, and abrasive.”
That's the way she comes across to me, even if she is 100% correct in everything she says.
And she isn't.
You pals with them then, she comes across as your average bigheaded , think they are special actress. Good old William he is not a wimp after all , rahter it is the big butch soldier boy who is Mr Wimpy.
I think he meant, 'and she isn't 100% correct in everything she says.'
I was thinking if she tires of the public spotlight she has a fabulous career ahead of her at OFSTED on that basis.
Fabulous career and OFSTED are not two things you often see linked.
Apparently the confrontation escalated because William called Meghan Markle “difficult, rude, and abrasive.”
That's the way she comes across to me, even if she is 100% correct in everything she says.
And she isn't.
You pals with them then, she comes across as your average bigheaded , think they are special actress. Good old William he is not a wimp after all , rahter it is the big butch soldier boy who is Mr Wimpy.
I think he meant, 'and she isn't 100% correct in everything she says.'
I was thinking if she tires of the public spotlight she has a fabulous career ahead of her at OFSTED on that basis.
Fabulous career and OFSTED are not two things you often see linked.
somebody can have a personally fabulous career while being an incompetent dickhead who leaves chaos in their wake.
A pedant wonders if the Star has not placed the Prime Minister in place of Captain Darling, albeit with Private Baldrick's catchphrase.
Melchett: 'honestly Darling, you are the most graceless, dimwitted bumpkin I ever met.' Darling (puzzled): 'I don't think you should say that to her, sir.'
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Its consequences, and how they are addressed, will be one of the most significant factors for the world economy over the next couple of decades. In some respects (reducing our own CO2 emissions), we've done fairly well. In others - creating new industrial infrastructure, for example - far less so. Electric motors, batteries, electric vehicles, power inverters etc are largely produced elsewhere, and our balance of payments will feel that for the foreseeable future.
It's partly the attitude that sees all if this as a cost, rather than a business opportunity, which means our economy will probably continue to underperform relative to our peers.
It really annoys me when people try to undermine wind power by saying we burn gas when the wind doesn’t blow. Whereas it’s genuinely remarkable that on a windy day we no longer have to burn gas.
I agree, we've been benefiting from a lot if wind power lately, yet we are still paying gas price equivalent electricity. We should be storing the gas at ti.es like these, like a gas battery or something. At Milford haven we have lng gas containers and I remember we used to store gas in the North Sea Wells off Yarmouth
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Its consequences, and how they are addressed, will be one of the most significant factors for the world economy over the next couple of decades. In some respects (reducing our own CO2 emissions), we've done fairly well. In others - creating new industrial infrastructure, for example - far less so. Electric motors, batteries, electric vehicles, power inverters etc are largely produced elsewhere, and our balance of payments will feel that for the foreseeable future.
It's partly the attitude that sees all if this as a cost, rather than a business opportunity, which means our economy will probably continue to underperform relative to our peers.
Other states that grew rich on oil recognise that.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
The 'pledges' are pretty risible, though. At least two of them will be achieved (or not), almost irrespective of what government does.
Why aren't we paying nurses and ambulance staff more to deal with understaffing, regardless of the strikes? If we were running a factory we'd need to pay the salaries necessary to get staff. Leaving aside considerations of where it's best to tax, would people begrudge (say) 1p on tax to pay for adequate hospital care? Don't think so.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
The 'pledges' are pretty risible, though. At least two of them will be achieved (or not), almost irrespective of what government does.
Something doesn't add up here. No wonder he needs remedial maths.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Its consequences, and how they are addressed, will be one of the most significant factors for the world economy over the next couple of decades. In some respects (reducing our own CO2 emissions), we've done fairly well. In others - creating new industrial infrastructure, for example - far less so. Electric motors, batteries, electric vehicles, power inverters etc are largely produced elsewhere, and our balance of payments will feel that for the foreseeable future.
It's partly the attitude that sees all if this as a cost, rather than a business opportunity, which means our economy will probably continue to underperform relative to our peers.
This was the point I was making earlier. The British Disease is that we have so decried investment that every time anything big comes along the response is "how do we afford that" or "who pays for that". We borrow. We invest. We receive a Return on Investment. Even better when we invest in things we need and things we can sell.
Instead the Spiv set who own the Tory party get very rich as middlemen selling everything off for a fat fee, and then in managing contracts from foreign owners always threatening to pull out unless subsidies are paid. Then close up shop anyway.
Whilst we are building a load of off-shore wind, none of the kit is UK. We have demand, we have industrial know-how, we have industrial capabilities. But we don't want to invest, especially in green crap, so we buy it from someone else then shout at the people stuck in warehousing jobs that they are unproductive.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
I rate Starmer (vs the rest of the Tory contenders) but he remains hobbled by his ideology which paints him into a corner. His list of priorities - some of these have been around since 2010 and sod all has been done about them. The question for all of them is "how".
They have no answers at all. The problem with setting out the things that concern people and then doing nothing about them is that voters tend to get a bit upset...
Have any of the papers spotted Sunak's inability to distinguish deficit from debt yet?
How could they? None of them have ever grasped the difference.
Cameron used to talk about “Paying off the deficit” or “Paying down the deficit”. Wrong then, and wrong now.
He also talked about “Austerity” while increasing government spending in real terms for four years straight, so I guess politicians will say anything they think the opposition (and an innumerate media, see yesterday morning’s thread) will not properly challenge.
So I see that in the US, McCarthy made another batch of procedural concessions including proposing that in future just one member could table a vote to remove the Speaker, without success, and it's still logjammed.
Why aren't we paying nurses and ambulance staff more to deal with understaffing, regardless of the strikes? If we were running a factory we'd need to pay the salaries necessary to get staff. Leaving aside considerations of where it's best to tax, would people begrudge (say) 1p on tax to pay for adequate hospital care? Don't think so.
The current situation is madness. Sunak's 'Sack the Nurses' bill is going to help immensely, obvs.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
I rate Starmer (vs the rest of the Tory contenders) but he remains hobbled by his ideology which paints him into a corner. His list of priorities - some of these have been around since 2010 and sod all has been done about them. The question for all of them is "how".
They have no answers at all. The problem with setting out the things that concern people and then doing nothing about them is that voters tend to get a bit upset...
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
I rate Starmer (vs the rest of the Tory contenders) but he remains hobbled by his ideology which paints him into a corner. His list of priorities - some of these have been around since 2010 and sod all has been done about them. The question for all of them is "how".
They have no answers at all. The problem with setting out the things that concern people and then doing nothing about them is that voters tend to get a bit upset...
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
I could be wrong, but I doubt it will make much difference. People will vote on lived experience and perceptions for the future, not on data points. Sunak promised to half the rate of inflation. So what? The issue is the cost of living. He made no promises about that. He promised to legislate on small boats. And? Anyone can do that. Stopping them is what matters to the Tory voting demographic. Reducing debt. That's meaningless to most voters. It's just a number, as is GDP growth. The only one that will have a direct impact is the waiting lists - but people will still be waiting.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
The 'pledges' are pretty risible, though. At least two of them will be achieved (or not), almost irrespective of what government does.
Oh, yes, I think the speech was entirely cynical in that sense, very much in the spirit of "I pledge that the sun will rise tomorrow". But all politicians do that sort of thing, and I think the speech shows him as a possibly effective politician for the first time. That's why it'll be interesting to see how much impact it has, or not - that will test the potential for a Tory recovery.
In coming months, problems will appear which will make people start to say "Oh, that was all talk", so a recovery will probably slip back somewhat. But I think he can reasonably hope that the lead will initially be cut from 20+ to the 10-15 range.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
Looking at the party messaging doesn't suggest much in the way of understanding.
Unsurprising even if true, such a disloyal family member.
I have a hard time believing it. Willy Wales looks, as my mother would have said, as soft as clarts. He flinches every time his RealDoll™ Mrs speaks to him.
The Coronation is going to be popcorn time for the people watchers.
I have booked a holiday abroad and will ignore the whole thing, as I did with the Queen's funeral.
The royal family is farcical and I don't like gawping at their entitled nonsense.
Give me real people watching. Sitting in cafes, chatting in shops, exchanging conversations with people on walks. Real people, real lives.
As a teacher you've booked a holiday abroad during term-time?
Wills rips Harry's necklace and Harry falls on top of the dog bowl. So Harry calls his therapist. Yet it is claimed that Meghan was suicidal but she was denied psychiatric help.
So I see that in the US, McCarthy made another batch of procedural concessions including proposing that in future just one member could table a vote to remove the Speaker, without success, and it's still logjammed.
He needs to get out the way tbh - dead in the water before he takes office.
Sunak’s Tories are now in the feedback doom loop where anything he or his ministers say is pre-judged as either bad or weak, because public opinion has decided they’re for the chop.
This is a non-fascist version of “our enemy is strong, and weak” thinking.
Hard line and typical Tory measures like the bill on industrial action are just confirmation they’re “bad”. And nobody is prepared to allow for good faith in these ideas
Moderately sensible or practical policy efforts - as mostly articulated in yesterdays speech - are just dismissed as weak and pathetic.
Wills rips Harry's necklace and Harry falls on top of the dog bowl. So Harry calls his therapist. Yet it is claimed that Meghan was suicidal but she was denied psychiatric help.
Logical inconsistincies throughout, trashing his own brother for publicity and cash. After the coronation Charles should formally cut them both off, formally remove their HRHs and just leave it to working royals
Have any of the papers spotted Sunak's inability to distinguish deficit from debt yet?
Yes, I was a bit confused by that. The primary deficit isn't expected to be eliminated until 2024-25 with the wider measure of the full deficit in 2027-28.
He knows this so I can only assume he expects to beat the Autumn Statement by the end of this year and then wants to start making some token down-payments on it to impress the markets.
I think this is wrong. Sunak's speech was effective in showing that he understood what is worrying people, and that's half the battle. The first poll after the speech will be interesting and should show the scope that the Conservatives have in recovering lost ground - especially the ex-Tory "don't knows".
I rate Starmer (vs the rest of the Tory contenders) but he remains hobbled by his ideology which paints him into a corner. His list of priorities - some of these have been around since 2010 and sod all has been done about them. The question for all of them is "how".
They have no answers at all. The problem with setting out the things that concern people and then doing nothing about them is that voters tend to get a bit upset...
Did you mean Sunak?
What a mistake-a to make-a!
Well, you knew you were going to write "they have no answers at all", so it's an easy mistake to make.
If the Tories are not trusted, do you think that maybe after Johnson and Truss, they take a lot of the blame for that. It’s not irrational to take what this government says with a pinch of salt. Sunak was Johnson’s right hand man after all.
Sunak didn’t help himself yesterday by creating pledges for things that were likely to happen regardless of anything he did.
If the Tories are not trusted, do you think that maybe after Johnson and Truss, they take a lot of the blame for that. It’s not irrational to take what this government says with a pinch of salt. Sunak was Johnson’s right hand man after all.
Sunak didn’t help himself yesterday by creating pledges for things that were likely to happen regardless of anything he did.
So I see that in the US, McCarthy made another batch of procedural concessions including proposing that in future just one member could table a vote to remove the Speaker, without success, and it's still logjammed.
He needs to get out the way tbh - dead in the water before he takes office.
Yes, McCarthy unlikely to get the Speakership having been voted down five times. My guess is a moderate Republican will eventually make it with many Democrats voting 'Present', but who knows. In any case much better than Biden could have expected before the midterms.
That *may* have been a good cartoon if innumeracy wasn't a massive problem. Governments can - and should - be able to address multiple issues at once.
Since there are few details on either plan, and the few regarding the maths one look bad on their face, the cartoon seems more successful than the speech.
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
Everything costs, but money invested in renewables insulates us from energy shocks like the one that we're in now. Oh, and the 'fuel' is free forever. It is a global issue and it isn't one we are solving alone, just look at the stats for China's renewables and the USA's Inflation Reduction Act. We should continue to do our bit out of enlightened self interest.
I agree with all that. But it shouldn’t be one of 5 or 6 pledges as it doesn’t really impact on people’s day to day & the activists will complain no matter what the government does
He talked about quite a lot that wasn't just the five pledges. In particular he talked about the future quite a lot, about making Britain the most innovative and productive economy. Ready to slip in a mention for the technology that is part of the great energy transition away from fossil fuels.
So I see that in the US, McCarthy made another batch of procedural concessions including proposing that in future just one member could table a vote to remove the Speaker, without success, and it's still logjammed.
He needs to get out the way tbh - dead in the water before he takes office.
Yes, McCarthy unlikely to get the Speakership having been voted down five times. My guess is a moderate Republican will eventually make it with many Democrats voting 'Present', but who knows. In any case much better than Biden could have expected before the midterms.
Six times!
There's a piece on CNN about the history of such cases - one in the 1920s otherwise all 19th Century. Most were resolved by a mix of concessions and switching to plurality voting - problem this time is that the former have all been proposed already and the latter delivers a Dem speaker! CNN reckons half of the rebels might be ready to peel away but this still leaves a hardcore of ten who can continue the blockage.
So I see that in the US, McCarthy made another batch of procedural concessions including proposing that in future just one member could table a vote to remove the Speaker, without success, and it's still logjammed.
The Boebart-Gaetz faction is all in on 'kill everyone, destroy everything' nihilism.
Given that most of the other GOP congressmen will want to achieve something (and some will lose in 2024 if they don't) there's going to plenty of GOP internal strife, possibly bipartisanship to get some things done, followed by even more GOP internal strife.
Wills rips Harry's necklace and Harry falls on top of the dog bowl. So Harry calls his therapist. Yet it is claimed that Meghan was suicidal but she was denied psychiatric help.
Dog bowl are dangerous
A friend was incredibly accident prone - getting a glass of water during the night, he trod on and broke the dog bowl.
This sliced a chunk out of his foot. Hospital job. At the hospital, they asked where the missing chunk of foot was. His finance checked the kitchen - given the paw prints she reckoned it had been… er…. absorbed.
He ended up having reconstructive surgery.
At the wedding he got a pile of stainless steel dog bowls inscribed with the Gadsden Flag motto.
Have any of the papers spotted Sunak's inability to distinguish deficit from debt yet?
Yes, I was a bit confused by that. The primary deficit isn't expected to be eliminated until 2024-25 with the wider measure of the full deficit in 2027-28.
He knows this so I can only assume he expects to beat the Autumn Statement by the end of this year and then wants to start making some token down-payments on it to impress the markets.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and I think this was a ruse to try and get the media/Labour to talk about the debt/deficit.
The country is in a bit of denial about how bad the fiscal situation is, but they're only willing to listen to Sunak/HMG in order to criticise them - so to get people to talk about the debt/deficit you have to say something to be criticised.
It's not good for Labour if the discussion moves away from how bad public services are, on to the fact that there is even less money than in 2010 to pay for them.
Comments
It is clear the climate is changing and more action should be taken. But this is a global issue and not one we can solve alone.
Moreover all action comes with a cost (and the UK is already doing a lot). I think in difficult economic times a bread and butter agenda is the right strategy
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/GBR/united-kingdom/carbon-co2-emissions
It has been a massive success for the UK, albeit a somewhat painful one. People who make out this government has done nothing about it are not interested in preventing a climate catastrophe, but base politics.
https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1610811173124833283?s=61&t=RHCX_17J7mwCQp2YoiqWPQ
And I say that as someone who's now there myself.
Did all the Sun's top people migrate to the Star?
Still, better late than never.
I'm guessing the palace will have to respond, even if it is in a "recollections may vary" way.
I'd also guess that this book is pretty much the end of it; all Harry's ammunition will have used. Communications between the royals and Harry will be muted and careful, as it's obvious that anything they say or do may be spun against them.
It is a global issue and it isn't one we are solving alone, just look at the stats for China's renewables and the USA's Inflation Reduction Act. We should continue to do our bit out of enlightened self interest.
That's the way she comes across to me, even if she is 100% correct in everything she says.
But we won't do any of those things. Because paying the Chinese government a vast mark-up for nuclear power which may come on line in a decade gives us a weapon to taunt Keir Starmer with.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nadhim-zahawi-mocked-for-backing-johnson-and-sunak-in-same-half-hour_uk_6355a711e4b08e0e608fcd8b
Extraordinary.
I was thinking if she tires of the public spotlight she has a fabulous career ahead of her at OFSTED on that basis.
The royal family is farcical and I don't like gawping at their entitled nonsense.
Give me real people watching. Sitting in cafes, chatting in shops, exchanging conversations with people on walks. Real people, real lives.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO55719
It's a relatively harmless hobby.
This guy appears to have problems tying his own shoelaces.
McCarthy’s political operation spent millions on lawmakers now opposing his speaker dreams
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/04/mccarthy-political-action-committee-opposition-00076377
Darling (puzzled): 'I don't think you should say that to her, sir.'
In some respects (reducing our own CO2 emissions), we've done fairly well.
In others - creating new industrial infrastructure, for example - far less so.
Electric motors, batteries, electric vehicles, power inverters etc are largely produced elsewhere, and our balance of payments will feel that for the foreseeable future.
It's partly the attitude that sees all if this as a cost, rather than a business opportunity, which means our economy will probably continue to underperform relative to our peers.
Tesla Officially Begins Construction of Lithium Refinery in Texas
https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesmanian-blog/tesla-officially-begins-construction-of-lithium-refinery-in-texas
At least two of them will be achieved (or not), almost irrespective of what government does.
Why aren't we paying nurses and ambulance staff more to deal with understaffing, regardless of the strikes? If we were running a factory we'd need to pay the salaries necessary to get staff. Leaving aside considerations of where it's best to tax, would people begrudge (say) 1p on tax to pay for adequate hospital care? Don't think so.
Instead the Spiv set who own the Tory party get very rich as middlemen selling everything off for a fat fee, and then in managing contracts from foreign owners always threatening to pull out unless subsidies are paid. Then close up shop anyway.
Whilst we are building a load of off-shore wind, none of the kit is UK. We have demand, we have industrial know-how, we have industrial capabilities. But we don't want to invest, especially in green crap, so we buy it from someone else then shout at the people stuck in warehousing jobs that they are unproductive.
They have no answers at all. The problem with setting out the things that concern people and then doing nothing about them is that voters tend to get a bit upset...
US spy-tech firm's controversial work with patient data pushed out 6 months due to delayed data platform procurement
https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/04/palantirs_covidera_uk_health_contract/
I presume everyone else was absorbed by the fast-moving House Speaker vote drama.
He also talked about “Austerity” while increasing government spending in real terms for four years straight, so I guess politicians will say anything they think the opposition (and an innumerate media, see yesterday morning’s thread) will not properly challenge.
In coming months, problems will appear which will make people start to say "Oh, that was all talk", so a recovery will probably slip back somewhat. But I think he can reasonably hope that the lead will initially be cut from 20+ to the 10-15 range.
Whilst Keir Starmer launches another rebrand, Conservatives are delivering on the people's priorities
https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/1610916510838521857
If you've changed leaders multiple times while in office, accusing the opposition of "rebranding' is just pathetic.
Interesting.
https://news.sky.com/watch-live
This is a non-fascist version of “our enemy is strong, and weak” thinking.
Hard line and typical Tory measures like the bill on industrial action are just confirmation they’re “bad”. And nobody is prepared to allow for good faith in these ideas
Moderately sensible or practical policy efforts - as mostly articulated in yesterdays speech - are just dismissed as weak and pathetic.
He knows this so I can only assume he expects to beat the Autumn Statement by the end of this year and then wants to start making some token down-payments on it to impress the markets.
Sunak didn’t help himself yesterday by creating pledges for things that were likely to happen regardless of anything he did.
I’m sitting back and lapping it all up with glee.
My guess is a moderate Republican will eventually make it with many Democrats voting 'Present', but who knows.
In any case much better than Biden could have expected before the midterms.
Does make you wonder why he avoided the topic.
Football: well, my Atalanta bet failed but it's come off 2/3 times for nice wins so can't be too grumpy.
Significant result with Inter beating Napoli (admittedly, a home win, but still, defeat for the leaders of Serie A).
There's a piece on CNN about the history of such cases - one in the 1920s otherwise all 19th Century. Most were resolved by a mix of concessions and switching to plurality voting - problem this time is that the former have all been proposed already and the latter delivers a Dem speaker! CNN reckons half of the rebels might be ready to peel away but this still leaves a hardcore of ten who can continue the blockage.
Given that most of the other GOP congressmen will want to achieve something (and some will lose in 2024 if they don't) there's going to plenty of GOP internal strife, possibly bipartisanship to get some things done, followed by even more GOP internal strife.
A friend was incredibly accident prone - getting a glass of water during the night, he trod on and broke the dog bowl.
This sliced a chunk out of his foot. Hospital job. At the hospital, they asked where the missing chunk of foot was. His finance checked the kitchen - given the paw prints she reckoned it had been… er…. absorbed.
He ended up having reconstructive surgery.
At the wedding he got a pile of stainless steel dog bowls inscribed with the Gadsden Flag motto.
The country is in a bit of denial about how bad the fiscal situation is, but they're only willing to listen to Sunak/HMG in order to criticise them - so to get people to talk about the debt/deficit you have to say something to be criticised.
It's not good for Labour if the discussion moves away from how bad public services are, on to the fact that there is even less money than in 2010 to pay for them.