I don't usually pay much attention to the Daily Mirror or the Sunday version. In fact this is the first time I've ever quoted a story from them. But this is serious.
Rishi Sunak accepted cash (£141,000) from fossil fuel investors in campaign to become PM
Donations from supporters with links to oil and gas helped fund new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Ready4Rishi leadership campaign - as he says he's too busy to attend the COP27 climate summit in Egypt
I don't usually pay much attention to the Daily Mirror or the Sunday version. In fact this is the first time I've ever quoted a story from them. But this is serious.
Rishi Sunak accepted cash (£141,000) from fossil fuel investors in campaign to become PM
Donations from supporters with links to oil and gas helped fund new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Ready4Rishi leadership campaign - as he says he's too busy to attend the COP27 climate summit in Egypt
I'm afraid that I'm beginning to think Rishi is yet another sleaze bag.
When the press start getting their knives out, which they will, his ratings will plummet. This COP27 boycott is pretty disgusting in the context.
Note also, and this is not just symbolic,, the demotion from cabinet of both posts linked to climate change - one a full cabinet post, the other a minister attending cabinet.
The only post in cabinet which might have been relevant, environment Secretary, is now occupied by the distinctly uninterested Coffey.
That's a pretty strong declaration of intent, and not in a good way.
Next time Andrew Sullivan is on the BBC telling us about left wing domination of US media, they might ask him about the Fox reaction to the Pelosi story. And the lack of interest of some of the 'liberal' media.
And published at the time in Finland, yet never made its way back into British politics in any way? No pointed questions from the opposition or cryptic comments in the media; no journalists either in the UK or elsewhere in the world willing to touch the story? Amazing.
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
And published at the time in Finland, yet never made its way back into British politics in any way? No pointed questions from the opposition or cryptic comments in the media; no journalists either in the UK or elsewhere in the world willing to touch the story? Amazing.
So it IS the Finland story? Serious but defintely not the sexy scandal some seemed to be implying.
And published at the time in Finland, yet never made its way back into British politics in any way? No pointed questions from the opposition or cryptic comments in the media; no journalists either in the UK or elsewhere in the world willing to touch the story? Amazing.
So it IS the Finland story? Serious but defintely not the sexy scandal some seemed to be implying.
Still waiting for a link to anything published in Finland
I don't usually pay much attention to the Daily Mirror or the Sunday version. In fact this is the first time I've ever quoted a story from them. But this is serious.
Rishi Sunak accepted cash (£141,000) from fossil fuel investors in campaign to become PM
Donations from supporters with links to oil and gas helped fund new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Ready4Rishi leadership campaign - as he says he's too busy to attend the COP27 climate summit in Egypt
I'm afraid that I'm beginning to think Rishi is yet another sleaze bag.
When the press start getting their knives out, which they will, his ratings will plummet. This COP27 boycott is pretty disgusting in the context.
"It includes £15,000 from ex-Tory treasurer Lord Michael Farmer, a hedge fund trader with shareholdings in Royal Dutch Shell and BP."
"And two businessmen linked to a wealth management fund that invests in the oil and gas sectors made donations of £30,000."
A pathetic non-story, because who doesn't have shares in BP? You do if you have a pension or a ftse100 tracker or a mainstream investment trust or quite possibly a direct holding.
My contempt for a press which publishes this sort of drivel and simultaneously sits on stories about Truss is unbounded.
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
Spot on. The only reason this is not more widely understood among the wider population is the compliant media. Much of the media is as corrupt as the Conservative & Unionist Party.
The Sunday Rawnsley, via damp Greenwich just a stone’s throw from Loopy’s London pad:
At the most recent meeting of the shadow cabinet, Sir Keir Starmer warned his colleagues to expect a significant Tory bounce in the polls…. says one senior Labour frontbencher: “I think we’ll get back to where we were four or five months ago.” If she’s correct, Tory morale ought to improve and some Labour people will get windy. [And] “We’ve got to be careful that we don’t look like we’re willing him to fail.”
The shrewder people in Labour’s ranks grasp that their framing of Mr Sunak can’t be identical to the narratives they told about feckless Mr Johnson and reckless Ms Truss. The new Tory leader is a different character and Labour won’t do itself any favours by pretending otherwise. [Labour does] not want to repeat what happened under Neil Kinnock in the early 1990s when Labour thought it had mastered how to beat Margaret Thatcher only then to founder when the Tories replaced her with John Major.
Character attacks can backfire by negatively defining the attacker. Lambasting him as Rishi the Rich will be a bad idea for Sir Keir’s party if it makes Labour seem anti-aspirational and hostile to success. Labour strategists say that what comes up in their focus groups is “everything from the designer clothes to the expensive coffee cup to not knowing how to use a debit card in a petrol station”.
A critical priority for Labour is to thwart Mr Sunak’s attempts to represent himself as a new broom. “We cannot possibly allow him to present himself as the change we need,” says a senior member of Sir Keir’s team. “We’ve got to pin the Tory record on him.”
[Economic] Misery made in the Kremlin. Misery made in Downing Street. There you have the rival stories. Which of these narratives proves most compelling to the public will, more than anything else, determine who prevails.
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Forgive me for having a few doubts. The Mail on Sunday is a newspaper you trust? Really? Where are the details that can be checked? It makes good copy, and no newspaper would turn it down, but when did you become so gullible.
Liz Truss was never my idea of an ideal PM, but a pinch of salt is required sometimes with our press. Next, you'll be believing that Putin always tells the truth.
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
Extending the freeze is politically clever, because it takes money away from people in the future that they won’t notice because it’s a freeze, yet enables the government to have more spending room right now. Economic and fiscal cleverness are another matters.
And published at the time in Finland, yet never made its way back into British politics in any way? No pointed questions from the opposition or cryptic comments in the media; no journalists either in the UK or elsewhere in the world willing to touch the story? Amazing.
So it IS the Finland story? Serious but defintely not the sexy scandal some seemed to be implying.
That surely depends on what kind of messages were on her phone?
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
If the Conservative Party was the caricature you make out then it would have lost power, permanently, some time in the 1830s.
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
If the Conservative Party was the caricature you make out then it would have lost power, permanently, some time in the 1830s.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
Maybe they thought The Handmaid's Tale was an instruction manual?
And published at the time in Finland, yet never made its way back into British politics in any way? No pointed questions from the opposition or cryptic comments in the media; no journalists either in the UK or elsewhere in the world willing to touch the story? Amazing.
So it IS the Finland story? Serious but defintely not the sexy scandal some seemed to be implying.
That surely depends on what kind of messages were on her phone?
FFS given what is generally accepted about a very senior politician's penchant for promiscuous unlubed buggery can we just agree that sex scandals are as archaic a concepts as 8 track audio tapes? Unless children or animals feature.
Forgive me for having a few doubts. The Mail on Sunday is a newspaper you trust? Really? Where are the details that can be checked? It makes good copy, and no newspaper would turn it down, but when did you become so gullible.
Liz Truss was never my idea of an ideal PM, but a pinch of salt is required sometimes with our press. Next, you'll be believing that Putin always tells the truth.
Sky News and BBC have the story front page, and we are not seeing any denials.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
Ukrainians claiming to have killed 950 Russians soldiers yesterday. Apparently mostly in the area of Donetsk (where the Russians advanced somewhat to the SW of Avdiivka) and Lyman.
This might be a consequence of the Russians throwing large numbers of recently mobilised soldiers into large-scale assaults.
My wife, who is on their panel, got a Yougov almost entirely about Scotland this morning. Not just independence but detailed questions on what the SG should do if the SC says no, what the priorities of the SG should be, what functions she thought that the SG was actually responsible for in whole or in part, whether devolution was a good idea etc etc.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
Maybe they thought The Handmaid's Tale was an instruction manual?
I think the causality is the other way round. Atwood saw what was happening in the US and could see where it was heading.
Bloody namby pamby Tofo-eating wokeraty remoaners. Just because the Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth and Development and no getting hacked by the KGB Office got her phone hacked by the KGB.
And by the way this is not primarily a story about Truss or Case it's a JOHNSON story with Truss in the Paterson/Pincher role, bearing out the argument that they could never have kept him on or had him back because the stories would just keep coming.
"Sky News and BBC have the story front page, and we are not seeing any denials."
They are reporting the newspaper story, and that there are calls for an inquiry, they are not backing the gist of the story. If there's any truth in it, I'll have to revise my view of the press.
So, there really was a red, London bus discovered on the moon?
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
Pakistan are about to get a tremendous boost to their NRR. It is increasingly becoming a lottery who is going to make the semifinals with weather likely to prove decisive.
Having seen what NZ did to Sri Lanka (as well as Australia) England are going to have to be at their absolute best to win that one. NZ look to me the form team in the tournament.
"It cost PBers a win" is not just irrelevant but downright weird. Get a grip.
I think you may be on the wrong website.
But it's not like you can even do anything with the information. You can't be sure it would have changed the result. You can't guard future bets against the possibility of an unknown unknown being suppressed. It's just bleating.
Sorry to be critical, @tse but I think you trivialise the issue, linking it to your 250/1 bet.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
The Tories take precisely one thing seriously: filling the pockets of themselves and their key backers (elderly homeowners in Southern England, and the very rich) by fucking over the rest of the population. The next round of cuts to services and rising taxes (targeted mainly at incomes, not assets,) is already on the way.
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
"Sky News and BBC have the story front page, and we are not seeing any denials."
They are reporting the newspaper story, and that there are calls for an inquiry, they are not backing the gist of the story. If there's any truth in it, I'll have to revise my view of the press.
So, there really was a red, London bus discovered on the moon?
Don't you start the bloody pointless not quoting thing.
Yes they are reporting the story not its substance but no they wouldn't be doing that unless they thought it had legs. They would not be doing this about bus on the moon stories.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
I can understand male shitkickers wanting to take southern Murica back to the civilization stone age. What I don't understand is female shitkickers voting to enslave themselves to these neanderthals. What is in it for them?
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
It’s good but irrelevant to the point that it failed. It was utterly implausible and then it happened.
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
May I ask: why are Truss, Case and The Oaf not under police investigation?
Oh wait. I think I know the answer to this one.
Careful now. Remember that giving contemporaneous opinions honestly held about stories in the public realm and definitely on the public interest is almost certainly libel...
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
I can understand male shitkickers wanting to take southern Murica back to the civilization stone age. What I don't understand is female shitkickers voting to enslave themselves to these neanderthals. What is in it for them?
Being roughly buggered by disgusting shits seems to be a hobby not confined to prime ministers.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
It’s good but irrelevant to the point that it failed. It was utterly implausible and then it happened.
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
Which is a long way from Gilead, which is my main point in all this. Maybe I’m wrong and in ten years most women in the US will be sterile and breeding women will be the privilidge of the elite. Or more realistically abortion will be banned, contraception banned and sex outside marriage illegal. I just don’t think it will happen. There are serious, religious, political nuts out there in the states, but the tide of human progress is against them. See also Iran right now.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Strong "Supreme Court will never overturn Roe" energy in this comment.
If you don't think Griswold is in the GOP sights you haven't been paying attention to the most trad fascist members of the Supreme Court have been publicly saying.
Griswold was only 1965, there are people very much alive today who lived in a USA where the purchase of contraception was illegal
After yesterday’s shocker in the Guardian a much more balanced piece in the Observer:
There is an ugly strain of leftwing thinking that posits that having Conservative values is not really compatible with being brown or black. It is most evident in the Labour MP Rupa Huq’s comment last month that the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is only “superficially black” (for which she has since apologised). This is not an isolated instance; in 2019, a Labour candidate said that Sajid Javid, then home secretary, “definitely orders lemon and herb Nando’s” in response to the jibe he “100% cooks boil-in-the-bag rice”; a modern version of the old “coconut” insult that he isn’t truly Asian.
One thing to pay attention to is that Germany is doing a lot of "Indirect" aid which graphs like these may or may not capture. They are providing replacement kit to Eastern European nations who transfer stuff to Ukraine.
So Slovenia transfer a bunch of M-55S (shite tank but Ukraine will take it) and Germany then supply Slovenia with equipment as replacement.
"Sky News and BBC have the story front page, and we are not seeing any denials."
They are reporting the newspaper story, and that there are calls for an inquiry, they are not backing the gist of the story. If there's any truth in it, I'll have to revise my view of the press.
So, there really was a red, London bus discovered on the moon?
Don't you start the bloody pointless not quoting thing.
Yes they are reporting the story not its substance but no they wouldn't be doing that unless they thought it had legs. They would not be doing this about bus on the moon stories.
Unless it was a Boris Brexit Bus, of course, in which case he wouild be busily making cardboard buses to swamp Google searches.
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
so why allow them personal phones in these roles? Personal sacrifice is needed in these roles and this should be one of them- Obama never was allowed on when President (as he referenced on Bear Grylls show that he did with him). I have been extremely shocked by the arrogance generally of the current crop of high office holders (not in policy proposals - thats just politics ) but in their general arrogance - Kwasi Kwarteng was so full of self importance that he even could keep still and serious at the Queens Funeral ,seemingly checking his phone for instance, Boris of course started it with ignoring his own covid rules
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
It’s good but irrelevant to the point that it failed. It was utterly implausible and then it happened.
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
Which is a long way from Gilead, which is my main point in all this. Maybe I’m wrong and in ten years most women in the US will be sterile and breeding women will be the privilidge of the elite. Or more realistically abortion will be banned, contraception banned and sex outside marriage illegal. I just don’t think it will happen. There are serious, religious, political nuts out there in the states, but the tide of human progress is against them. See also Iran right now.
The tide of human history depends a lot on the political hegemons of the day. If the US becomes a fundamentalist religious state it would be quite unsurprising to see that exported to much of the rest of the democratic world over a decade or two, leaving Northern Europe and the odd holdout elsewhere the exception rather the forerunners of history.
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
so why allow them personal phones in these roles? Personal sacrifice is needed in these roles and this should be one of them- Obama never was allowed on when President (as he referenced on Bear Grylls show that he did with him)
Who is there to say no you can't have one? Boris? Hehe.....
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
It’s good but irrelevant to the point that it failed. It was utterly implausible and then it happened.
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
Which is a long way from Gilead, which is my main point in all this. Maybe I’m wrong and in ten years most women in the US will be sterile and breeding women will be the privilidge of the elite. Or more realistically abortion will be banned, contraception banned and sex outside marriage illegal. I just don’t think it will happen. There are serious, religious, political nuts out there in the states, but the tide of human progress is against them. See also Iran right now.
The Handmaid's Tale considered the reaction to a sterility crisis. The GOP don't care about that bit, they just like the idea of a white patriarchy where men of power command all that they see, the womenfolk know their place and the minorities go away.
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
so why allow them personal phones in these roles? Personal sacrifice is needed in these roles and this should be one of them- Obama never was allowed on when President (as he referenced on Bear Grylls show that he did with him)
If you don't allow them personal phones they'll do all their personal stuff on the work phone and you're back where you started.
Alternatively if you're going to lock down the work phone to the point where they can't use Whats App, and you can somehow force them to accept this despite the fact that they're nominally in charge of you not the other way around, they'll be instantly out-plotted and you'll have to start again with a new minister.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
It’s good but irrelevant to the point that it failed. It was utterly implausible and then it happened.
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
Which is a long way from Gilead, which is my main point in all this. Maybe I’m wrong and in ten years most women in the US will be sterile and breeding women will be the privilidge of the elite. Or more realistically abortion will be banned, contraception banned and sex outside marriage illegal. I just don’t think it will happen. There are serious, religious, political nuts out there in the states, but the tide of human progress is against them. See also Iran right now.
The tide of human progress argument collapsed the day the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs Wade.
That doesn’t mean this is going to happen, but the “nuts” are in control of the Republican Party and they’re clear about the direction they want to go in.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
I can understand male shitkickers wanting to take southern Murica back to the civilization stone age. What I don't understand is female shitkickers voting to enslave themselves to these neanderthals. What is in it for them?
how can you go back to somewhere you've never left?
Hmmm. I think a slave state can be described as the civilization stone age. And they still pine for it.
It seems to me that there could be good reasons to keep such a leak secret. It would be an opportunity to transfer false information, for example. There may be assets which the Russians know about but would sweep up when the leak was discovered who might be given some sort of a chance to run.
But it is also significant that this leak seems to have been on a private phone. If there was top secret material on a private phone Truss would have been guilty of what Braverman resigned for. The blazing row that allegedly took place between her and Truss comes back to mind: sacking her for something that Braverman knew Truss had been equally guilty of would cause rancor. And given leaky Sue's reputation is this why the story is public now?
If there is truth in the story, I'm all in favour of it being investigated, and the miscreants punished. But you have to ask 'cui bono'. The newspaper gets publicity, and Truss's opponents gain traction, even if it's too late to affect anything.
It might turn out to be true, but evidence would be nice, rather than the words of someone with an axe to grind or newspapers to sell.
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
Are you saying if you don't own your own business or work in "higher professional jobs" then that's failure?
Amanda Akass @amandaakass · 11m Labour says the alleged hack raises “serious security questions” which need urgent investigation. Lib Dems questioning why the details were not made public earlier. Tobias Elwood, Tory Chair of Defence Committee, tells Sky News Intelligence & Security Committee should investigate
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
so why allow them personal phones in these roles? Personal sacrifice is needed in these roles and this should be one of them- Obama never was allowed on when President (as he referenced on Bear Grylls show that he did with him)
If you don't allow them personal phones they'll do all their personal stuff on the work phone and you're back where you started.
Alternatively if you're going to lock down the work phone to the point where they can't use Whats App, and you can somehow force them to accept this despite the fact that they're nominally in charge of you not the other way around, they'll be instantly out-plotted and you'll have to start again with a new minister.
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
Are you saying if you don't own your own business or work in "higher professional jobs" then that's failure?
Yes.
I see. Well, I'm sure "White British families" will be eager for more of your lessons. Any day now.
They should be, not mine, the Hindu community that has gone from having nothing when arriving in the 60s and 70s to being the second highest earning religious group, the first non white PM and quite simply the backbone of the NHS. If people don't want to learn from that then more fool them.
It seems to me that there could be good reasons to keep such a leak secret. It would be an opportunity to transfer false information, for example. There may be assets which the Russians know about but would sweep up when the leak was discovered who might be given some sort of a chance to run.
But it is also significant that this leak seems to have been on a private phone. If there was top secret material on a private phone Truss would have been guilty of what Braverman resigned for. The blazing row that allegedly took place between her and Truss comes back to mind: sacking her for something that Braverman knew Truss had been equally guilty of would cause rancor. And given leaky Sue's reputation is this why the story is public now?
Is this the same story that was going round in the Baltics in the spring? Not sure a UK specific press blackout really fools the Russians but the establishment has to establishment I guess......
the 250/1 missed bet angle is an aside and only worth a footnote ( you pay your money and take your chances especially in political betting ) but this is a really serious story especially given the danger the world faces with the Russia/Ukraine dispute. This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks. Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Having done IT security stuff it's never easy to get higher-ups to follow the security rules. The problem is that they tend to be quite petty and bureaucratic-seeming, and they really get in the way of getting actual immediate work done.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
so why allow them personal phones in these roles? Personal sacrifice is needed in these roles and this should be one of them- Obama never was allowed on when President (as he referenced on Bear Grylls show that he did with him)
If you don't allow them personal phones they'll do all their personal stuff on the work phone and you're back where you started.
Alternatively if you're going to lock down the work phone to the point where they can't use Whats App, and you can somehow force them to accept this despite the fact that they're nominally in charge of you not the other way around, they'll be instantly out-plotted and you'll have to start again with a new minister.
I am sure private matters can be conveyed through PA's, personal staff etc . i think denial of access to WhatsApp etc is a small price to pay to ensure national security and one that any serious high office holder would accept - Any high office holder must realise they are not important anymore, its the job .
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
It’s the ones who think it’s a manifesto that we need to worry about.
You mean the loons and fruitcakes? Every society has them. We do too. They are not in power.
Look up thread.
Do you really believe that a law to ban contraceptives will be enacted in the USA? Really? I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU more likely.
Do you really believe that the President of the US would encourage a violent mob to storm Congress? That once seemed utterly implausible, yet it then happened.
I’ll give you that one, but note that it failed and law and order won. To go back to my suggestion, I think the U.K. rejoining the full fat EU is more likely than a ban on contraception in the USA. I made no mention of marital rape.
I think a law to ban in at least one state is far from impossible within the next decade. And more likely than rejoining full membership of the EU in that timeframe. And we know there are at least three SC Justices who would vote to overturn Griswold - though for now I don’t think there would be more than four votes to do so. That could easily change under another Republican president.
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
Are you saying if you don't own your own business or work in "higher professional jobs" then that's failure?
Yes.
I see. Well, I'm sure "White British families" will be eager for more of your lessons. Any day now.
In New York they have a selective state school for the best and brightest. Despite considerable efforts, the number of Chinese students continues to rise. To the point that some quite liberal people want a cap on the number of Chinese students, to leave space for “other ethnic minorities”
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
Are you saying if you don't own your own business or work in "higher professional jobs" then that's failure?
Yes.
I see. Well, I'm sure "White British families" will be eager for more of your lessons. Any day now.
They should be, not mine, the Hindu community that has gone from having nothing when arriving in the 60s and 70s to being the second highest earning religious group, the first non white PM and quite simply the backbone of the NHS. If people don't want to learn from that then more fool them.
Next time Andrew Sullivan is on the BBC telling us about left wing domination of US media, they might ask him about the Fox reaction to the Pelosi story. And the lack of interest of some of the 'liberal' media.
If you ban the sale of contraception, the only legal route left to women is withholding sex. Not sure this is the vote winner he thinks it is.
That’s the next thing they’ll ban. Have you read the Handmaids Tale?
You know that’s fiction, right? I think too many seem to think it’s a bloody documentary.
I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to see marital rape decriminalised. There doesn't seem to be any limit to their assault on women's rights.
I can understand male shitkickers wanting to take southern Murica back to the civilization stone age. What I don't understand is female shitkickers voting to enslave themselves to these neanderthals. What is in it for them?
Accounts from the US when I was there were of women registering for the midterms in record numbers
Comments
Astonishing story.
@TSE is right to be so angry. Like Braverman's appointment, this is a disgrace.
I agree with your main point, though. A complete disaster for our national security.
Why do the tories not take this shit seriously?
A) The fact it leaked. By who? What is the agenda?
B ) It’s highly unlikely to be the only successful government hack.
C) The govt line that it doesn’t comment on this kind of thing will only feed the beast.
D) (related to b)) Cumming’s comments re: Braverman indicates a casual approach to sensitive information across government.
I think this will run and run.
Rishi Sunak accepted cash (£141,000) from fossil fuel investors in campaign to become PM
Donations from supporters with links to oil and gas helped fund new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Ready4Rishi leadership campaign - as he says he's too busy to attend the COP27 climate summit in Egypt
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/rishi-sunak-accepted-cash-fossil-28361452
I'm afraid that I'm beginning to think Rishi is yet another sleaze bag.
When the press start getting their knives out, which they will, his ratings will plummet. This COP27 boycott is pretty disgusting in the context.
The only post in cabinet which might have been relevant, environment Secretary, is now occupied by the distinctly uninterested Coffey.
That's a pretty strong declaration of intent, and not in a good way.
And the lack of interest of some of the 'liberal' media.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jesseltaylor/status/1586496754408644608
Pretty sure the NYT will end up having devoted more time and resources to Sarah Huckabee Sanders being asked to leave a restaurant than an assassination attempt on the Speaker of the House
So it's not just those with the 250/1 bets who lost out.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HeartlandSignal/status/1570447074252197892
Betting Post
F1: backed Hamilton to lead lap 1 at 5.25.
https://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2022/10/mexico-pre-race-2022.html
The latest, highly plausible, rumour doing the rounds is that they plan to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for an additional two years, so as to try to turn as many people of working age as possible into higher rate income tax payers. I'm frankly astonished that they've not unpicked the Truss repeal of the Health and Social Care Levy to boot - although I imagine that NI rises will also be back, in one form or another, before very much longer.
The Conservative Party exists for one purpose and one purpose only: the redistribution of wealth upwards. What have, amongst other things, defence, security, the environment and schooling to do with that? Why should we expect them to care about any of it? They don't. End of story.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/ukraine-unleashes-mass-kamikaze-drone-boat-attack-on-russias-black-sea-fleet-headquarters
"And two businessmen linked to a wealth management fund that invests in the oil and gas sectors made donations of £30,000."
A pathetic non-story, because who doesn't have shares in BP? You do if you have a pension or a ftse100 tracker or a mainstream investment trust or quite possibly a direct holding.
My contempt for a press which publishes this sort of drivel and simultaneously sits on stories about Truss is unbounded.
https://twitter.com/lktranslator/status/1586484150751891461?s=46&t=e5E0AjRiCaRH3tk1QxwTIA
At the most recent meeting of the shadow cabinet, Sir Keir Starmer warned his colleagues to expect a significant Tory bounce in the polls…. says one senior Labour frontbencher: “I think we’ll get back to where we were four or five months ago.” If she’s correct, Tory morale ought to improve and some Labour people will get windy. [And] “We’ve got to be careful that we don’t look like we’re willing him to fail.”
The shrewder people in Labour’s ranks grasp that their framing of Mr Sunak can’t be identical to the narratives they told about feckless Mr Johnson and reckless Ms Truss. The new Tory leader is a different character and Labour won’t do itself any favours by pretending otherwise. [Labour does] not want to repeat what happened under Neil Kinnock in the early 1990s when Labour thought it had mastered how to beat Margaret Thatcher only then to founder when the Tories replaced her with John Major.
Character attacks can backfire by negatively defining the attacker. Lambasting him as Rishi the Rich will be a bad idea for Sir Keir’s party if it makes Labour seem anti-aspirational and hostile to success. Labour strategists say that what comes up in their focus groups is “everything from the designer clothes to the expensive coffee cup to not knowing how to use a debit card in a petrol station”.
A critical priority for Labour is to thwart Mr Sunak’s attempts to represent himself as a new broom. “We cannot possibly allow him to present himself as the change we need,” says a senior member of Sir Keir’s team. “We’ve got to pin the Tory record on him.”
[Economic] Misery made in the Kremlin. Misery made in Downing Street. There you have the rival stories. Which of these narratives proves most compelling to the public will, more than anything else, determine who prevails.
This is so serious there surely has to be a criminal investigation regarding the Official Secrets Act. I am sure recklessly handling top secret information is an offence even if not deliberately leaking it, as is covering up such leaks.
Why are the current crop of top politicians so ignorant of these rules ? Is it that they were promoted too quickly and lost the sense of importance of these roles and that its not the individual in these roles that is important but the role itself?
Forgive me for having a few doubts. The Mail on Sunday is a newspaper you trust? Really? Where are the details that can be checked? It makes good copy, and no newspaper would turn it down, but when did you become so gullible.
Liz Truss was never my idea of an ideal PM, but a pinch of salt is required sometimes with our press. Next, you'll be believing that Putin always tells the truth.
One day Scottish Tory MSPs will learn that lesson.
This might be a consequence of the Russians throwing large numbers of recently mobilised soldiers into large-scale assaults.
https://mobile.twitter.com/GeneralStaffUA/status/1586621423379947520
I wonder who that was for.
There is literally no story here.
It's the third leak inquiry into the Home Sec this year.
https://twitter.com/thejonnyreilly/status/1586422183576109056?s=46&t=h95SjZmK99II4t_wyyjrHw
"Sky News and BBC have the story front page, and we are not seeing any denials."
They are reporting the newspaper story, and that there are calls for an inquiry, they are not backing the gist of the story. If there's any truth in it, I'll have to revise my view of the press.
So, there really was a red, London bus discovered on the moon?
Having seen what NZ did to Sri Lanka (as well as Australia) England are going to have to be at their absolute best to win that one. NZ look to me the form team in the tournament.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nick-clegg/10455206/Tories-ready-to-adopt-Nick-Cleggs-pledge-to-cut-income-tax-for-lower-earners.html
Yes they are reporting the story not its substance but no they wouldn't be doing that unless they thought it had legs. They would not be doing this about bus on the moon stories.
Oh wait. I think I know the answer to this one.
Europe’s security is being paid for by the UK and Poland and on a per capita basis Denmark and Estonia and Lithuania.
https://twitter.com/danielkorski/status/1586622730920673280
I don’t think all contraception will be banned throughout the US either… but the morning after pill? Contraceptive methods that are partially abortifacient? In certain states?
But this would hardly be ordinary police, would it? It would have to be something like Counter Terrorism Command.
The situation here is that it's not really possible to secure someone's Android phone or iPhone against an attacker with a sufficient budget, because with enough money you can buy exploits that nobody else yet even knows about. The normal solution is to compartmentalize, so they'd use one phone for stuff that doesn't need to be very secure and a different device for stuff that does. But compartmentalization is really hard to apply in practice, especially when the user is dealing with the same people for different purposes, and they have to remember to use this device to ask about the party and this other device to talk about the urgent issue they're going to have a meeting about before they go to the party.
I'm sure it doesn't help that Brexit and the general state of the Conservative Party has selected for con artists and dim-wits and they've literally kicked the other people out of the party, but the fundamental problem of securing communications without destroying productivity is genuinely hard.
Not safe to handle our security.
Time to get them out.
I just don’t think it will happen. There are serious, religious, political nuts out there in the states, but the tide of human progress is against them. See also Iran right now.
If you don't think Griswold is in the GOP sights you haven't been paying attention to the most trad fascist members of the Supreme Court have been publicly saying.
Griswold was only 1965, there are people very much alive today who lived in a USA where the purchase of contraception was illegal
There is an ugly strain of leftwing thinking that posits that having Conservative values is not really compatible with being brown or black. It is most evident in the Labour MP Rupa Huq’s comment last month that the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is only “superficially black” (for which she has since apologised). This is not an isolated instance; in 2019, a Labour candidate said that Sajid Javid, then home secretary, “definitely orders lemon and herb Nando’s” in response to the jibe he “100% cooks boil-in-the-bag rice”; a modern version of the old “coconut” insult that he isn’t truly Asian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/30/rishi-sunak-politics-wretched-but-as-british-indian-i-see-why-his-rise-to-top-matters
Get it out!!
So Slovenia transfer a bunch of M-55S (shite tank but Ukraine will take it) and Germany then supply Slovenia with equipment as replacement.
I have been extremely shocked by the arrogance generally of the current crop of high office holders (not in policy proposals - thats just politics ) but in their general arrogance - Kwasi Kwarteng was so full of self importance that he even could keep still and serious at the Queens Funeral ,seemingly checking his phone for instance, Boris of course started it with ignoring his own covid rules
Great article from The Times. Gives people a good background into the driving force of success for British Indians and Hindus. The UK could learn a lot from our cultural values, hopefully Rishi is able to impart some on the wider nation.
In case anyone doesn't want to read it, the three keys are education, family and education. In that order. Every single one of my cousins is degree educated and all of them work in higher professional jobs or own and run businesses. There's simply no option of failure given to us as kids, parental support in education, high expectations and ongoing support after university are key to all of us being successful. White British families could learn a lot.
Alternatively if you're going to lock down the work phone to the point where they can't use Whats App, and you can somehow force them to accept this despite the fact that they're nominally in charge of you not the other way around, they'll be instantly out-plotted and you'll have to start again with a new minister.
Here’s a US “pro-life” group taking aim at the Pill: https://www.hli.org/resources/abortifacient-brief-birth-control-pill/
Here’s a serious law article talking about the threat to some contraceptive methods: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/gender-journal/abortion-trigger-ban-statutes-impacts-on-plan-b-birth-control-and-ivf-treatments/
That doesn’t mean this is going to happen, but the “nuts” are in control of the Republican Party and they’re clear about the direction they want to go in.
But it is also significant that this leak seems to have been on a private phone. If there was top secret material on a private phone Truss would have been guilty of what Braverman resigned for. The blazing row that allegedly took place between her and Truss comes back to mind: sacking her for something that Braverman knew Truss had been equally guilty of would cause rancor. And given leaky Sue's reputation is this why the story is public now?
If there is truth in the story, I'm all in favour of it being investigated, and the miscreants punished. But you have to ask 'cui bono'. The newspaper gets publicity, and Truss's opponents gain traction, even if it's too late to affect anything.
It might turn out to be true, but evidence would be nice, rather than the words of someone with an axe to grind or newspapers to sell.
Amanda Akass
@amandaakass
·
11m
Labour says the alleged hack raises “serious security questions” which need urgent investigation. Lib Dems questioning why the details were not made public earlier. Tobias Elwood, Tory Chair of Defence Committee, tells Sky News Intelligence & Security Committee should investigate
And we know there are at least three SC Justices who would vote to overturn Griswold - though for now I don’t think there would be more than four votes to do so. That could easily change under another Republican president.
Not enough to make up for the interest rate hit...
You may well discover there are *reasons* this story is being underplayed