Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Join the celebrations for PB’s 18th anniversary – politicalbetting.com

12346

Comments

  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,702
    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Almost as if it was designed for that.

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,760

    DavidL said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    tpfkar said:

    Hello.
    I haven’t posted since GE2019 as the prospect of Boris Johnson with a majority was just too ghastly to spend time discussing. Seems like a few more have now come to the same view!

    As a 2005-er I’m delighted to see PB going strong and I will see if March 2nd is possible. We’ve just had a new baby so will depend on how things are at home.

    Glad to see so many posters I remember on good form. And that list from Cookie brought back memories. I particularly remember the likes of SBS and Mark Senior no longer with us.

    Hello tpfkar! Glad to see you.
    SBS no longer with us? I don't think I knew that. That's sad. I was thinking about Mark Senior the other day, oddly. Remembering that he chose to celebrate winning a prediction competition with a picture of his son smashing him over the head with a chair.
    Andy Cooke dates from those days too, I think, and Stuart Dickson - and possibly malcolmg? Anyone else from back then? There must be loads of names knocking around the back of my mind.
    I honestly can't recall when I came across PB but it was well before the 2010 election, possibly around the time of the 2007 Scottish elections. It has been an enormous source of information and entertainment ever since. Thanks Mike and Robert for your efforts.
    The 2007 Scottish GE was momentous betting-wise. I had at least two 50/1 winners. No thanks to PB! 😉
    What is surprising in retrospect is how well both the Labour and Tory vote stood up. Salmond got his plurality by wiping out the sundry nutters that had infested the Scottish Parliament. And then he replaced them with new ones.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,842
    Morning all :)

    It's nice to have an occasional wallow, hippo-like, in nostalgia. I have to say OGH's bet on Obama becoming President remains one of the seminal moments in betting terms.

    With the coming of the exchanges, the nature of the betting beast has changed and trading in and out of positions has become far more the norm and as we saw with North Shropshire a few weeks ago, sharp movements in trades can provide real opportunities - as a follower of the horses for many years, I would never bet in-running as the unexpected seems almost to be the norm.

    Election nights on here are always wonderful - 2005 was much quieter but nothing will beat the drama of 2017 and @david_herdson's infamous post from the night before which I think was manna from heaven for some traders.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    stodge said:

    Morning all :)

    It's nice to have an occasional wallow, hippo-like, in nostalgia. I have to say OGH's bet on Obama becoming President remains one of the seminal moments in betting terms.

    William Glenn won a bag of sand (charitably reduced from 10) from our own Garth Marenghi over the EU exit date. Also seminal.
  • Roger said:

    vino said:

    Cookie said:

    18 years. Bloody Hell.
    I wasn't here from the start. I arrived when looking for some information about the Cheadle by-election - what, June 2005? I remember a conversation in so much more detail than is ever given to these things. Absolutely amazing that here were people who enjoyed the minutiae that I did. Discussion of the electoral geography of the Cheadle constituency quickly segued - indeed, ran alongside - a conversation about the merits of British cheeses.
    Lots of names from those days still with us. OGH and Robert, of course. Roger. Stodge (with whom, I remember, very early on, a detailed conversation about the EU - how wonderful to find a place where such things can be explored in such detail without rancour), Nick Palmer (myMP at the time - how amazing to be discussing politics with my MP) - even Jack W still puts in the odd appearance. Who else from those days? Sean Fear, Alistair Matlock, Woody 662, Stuart Penketh. Seems I only remember lapsed Tories?
    How have I been hanging around here for 16 years? Since when I have found a wife, had three daughters, changed career twice and home city once.
    And ah, pb, we have been through such a lot together. Especially the last two years.
    Well done Mike and Robert for running such a remarkable corner of the internet.

    I think that I'm the "oldest" poster - lots of LD posters in the early days - I enjoyed taking the mick out of them - claim to fame I started the "first" - October 2008
    My claim to fame. Mike spotted a young boy who no one had heard of and asked "Could this be the next President of the United States?".

    I laughed and answered 'NO' and the rest is history.

    Mike became the most famous tipster in the land. Obama became the first black President and I became a laughing stock.
    Until then you were just Roger.

    You became Rogerdamus that fateful day.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    Roger said:

    vino said:

    Cookie said:

    18 years. Bloody Hell.
    I wasn't here from the start. I arrived when looking for some information about the Cheadle by-election - what, June 2005? I remember a conversation in so much more detail than is ever given to these things. Absolutely amazing that here were people who enjoyed the minutiae that I did. Discussion of the electoral geography of the Cheadle constituency quickly segued - indeed, ran alongside - a conversation about the merits of British cheeses.
    Lots of names from those days still with us. OGH and Robert, of course. Roger. Stodge (with whom, I remember, very early on, a detailed conversation about the EU - how wonderful to find a place where such things can be explored in such detail without rancour), Nick Palmer (myMP at the time - how amazing to be discussing politics with my MP) - even Jack W still puts in the odd appearance. Who else from those days? Sean Fear, Alistair Matlock, Woody 662, Stuart Penketh. Seems I only remember lapsed Tories?
    How have I been hanging around here for 16 years? Since when I have found a wife, had three daughters, changed career twice and home city once.
    And ah, pb, we have been through such a lot together. Especially the last two years.
    Well done Mike and Robert for running such a remarkable corner of the internet.

    I think that I'm the "oldest" poster - lots of LD posters in the early days - I enjoyed taking the mick out of them - claim to fame I started the "first" - October 2008
    My claim to fame. Mike spotted a young boy who no one had heard of and asked "Could this be the next President of the United States?".

    I laughed and answered 'NO' and the rest is history.

    Mike became the most famous tipster in the land. Obama became the first black President and I became a laughing stock.
    Don’t be so hard on yourself - Rogerdamus is also a legend.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,842
    Speaking of pointless suggestions and with @MoonRabbit having seemingly disappeared (posters come, posters go) my three for today's equine action - put them in a Patent or, if you have any sense, find three others:

    GUNSIGHT RIDGE 1.15 Sandown
    ARAMIS GREY 2.51 Lingfield
    THE WOLF 3.45 Musselburgh

    This exceptionally mild and dry winter (for which we will either pay with a cold wet spring or with water shortages come the summer) has left today's cards with more small fields.

    Of the 21 turf jump races being run today, only 2 have double figure fields and 12 have fewer than eight runners making each way options limited to 1-2.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,357
    Leon said:

    I asked @NASA Administrator @SenBillNelson what he sees as his agency’s role in investigating UFOs/UAPs: “It’s a natural conclusion for me as a thinking human being … 1/

    “ … in a universe that is so large that I can’t even conceive how large, that there is not some form of life that maybe has evolved into intelligent beings?” 2/

    Could they explain some of the recent sightings by military pilots? “I’m not limiting anything,” he responded. 3/

    “I hope it’s not one of our terrestrial enemies that has that kind of technology, because that would mean that somebody is very, very advanced.” 4/

    What is it? “I don’t know.” Who’s job is it? “One of NASA’s missions is to search for life,” he said, citing the James Webb Space Telescope. “We’re not out there to say that there’s a UAP here or there.” 5/5


    https://twitter.com/bryandbender/status/1488004083298418693?s=21


    That’s the current head of NASA saying “Yeah, basically aliens”

    You think?? My between the lines reading is that he refuses to label the recent 'phenomena' as of alien origin, and deliberately introduces the idea of advanced military technology being behind them in as loyal a way as possible.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    stodge said:

    Morning all :)

    It's nice to have an occasional wallow, hippo-like, in nostalgia. I have to say OGH's bet on Obama becoming President remains one of the seminal moments in betting terms.

    With the coming of the exchanges, the nature of the betting beast has changed and trading in and out of positions has become far more the norm and as we saw with North Shropshire a few weeks ago, sharp movements in trades can provide real opportunities - as a follower of the horses for many years, I would never bet in-running as the unexpected seems almost to be the norm.

    Election nights on here are always wonderful - 2005 was much quieter but nothing will beat the drama of 2017 and @david_herdson's infamous post from the night before which I think was manna from heaven for some traders.

    What a great bet on Obama. OGH could soon be joined by @Philip_Thompson (or is @BartholomewRoberts ) re Sunak - not sure myself but would be a great call if it came off.

    I’d wish I had paid more attention to @david_herdson Re 2017, it would have saved me a lot of money!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    I have little recall of when I started posting other than it having been well before Obama’s first election. I remain grateful to the site and its denizens for helping me make quite a lot if money on that.
    I lapsed at one point and came back with a new account.

    Still the best place for breaking news.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,773
    Leon said:

    I asked @NASA Administrator @SenBillNelson what he sees as his agency’s role in investigating UFOs/UAPs: “It’s a natural conclusion for me as a thinking human being … 1/

    “ … in a universe that is so large that I can’t even conceive how large, that there is not some form of life that maybe has evolved into intelligent beings?” 2/

    Could they explain some of the recent sightings by military pilots? “I’m not limiting anything,” he responded. 3/

    “I hope it’s not one of our terrestrial enemies that has that kind of technology, because that would mean that somebody is very, very advanced.” 4/

    What is it? “I don’t know.” Who’s job is it? “One of NASA’s missions is to search for life,” he said, citing the James Webb Space Telescope. “We’re not out there to say that there’s a UAP here or there.” 5/5


    https://twitter.com/bryandbender/status/1488004083298418693?s=21


    That’s the current head of NASA saying “Yeah, basically aliens”

    You are reading too much into that.

    You for a start can not assume that because there is intelligent life here that there will be elsewhere. There almost certainly is. You only have to consider the Boltzmann brain theory that it is likely, let alone through the more obvious random events that lead to evolution.

    But on the other side people do fall for the fallacy 'if it has happened here it must have happened somewhere else with the size of the Universe'. Remember the probability of it happening here is 1, as it has already happened. We can only consider it because it is after the event. Prior to that the probability may have been infinitesimally small. Consider the lottery jackpot winner. The winner doesn't say 'well I have won this week so there must be lots of other jackpot winners this week' does he. There aren't.

    And of course if they are there it doesn't mean they are here and if they are here why do they mainly pick on on nutters to buzz. The only logical conclusion to that is they are teenage aliens having a laugh.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,737

    Leon said:

    I asked @NASA Administrator @SenBillNelson what he sees as his agency’s role in investigating UFOs/UAPs: “It’s a natural conclusion for me as a thinking human being … 1/

    “ … in a universe that is so large that I can’t even conceive how large, that there is not some form of life that maybe has evolved into intelligent beings?” 2/

    Could they explain some of the recent sightings by military pilots? “I’m not limiting anything,” he responded. 3/

    “I hope it’s not one of our terrestrial enemies that has that kind of technology, because that would mean that somebody is very, very advanced.” 4/

    What is it? “I don’t know.” Who’s job is it? “One of NASA’s missions is to search for life,” he said, citing the James Webb Space Telescope. “We’re not out there to say that there’s a UAP here or there.” 5/5


    https://twitter.com/bryandbender/status/1488004083298418693?s=21


    That’s the current head of NASA saying “Yeah, basically aliens”

    You think?? My between the lines reading is that he refuses to label the recent 'phenomena' as of alien origin, and deliberately introduces the idea of advanced military technology being behind them in as loyal a way as possible.
    Bill Nelson has been pretty plain in other interviews when asked what he thinks UAP are.

    Will be interesting to see what the Galileo project uncovers. We’ve had an ex DNI confirm on the record that military satellite data has corroborated that there’s ultra tech in our skies that we don’t understand. If that’s the case, it shouldn’t be too long before civilian science via Galileo can confirm the same, given the sightings around military assets are claimed by some pilots to not be rare but an almost daily occurrence in some locations.

    That’s without the soft disclosure we’ll likely get from JWST in the next couple of years, confirming atmospheric oxygen and other biochemical indicators in an exo planet. That should lift a few heads out the sand. Perhaps even here.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,606
    Started reading PB in 2004, plucked up the courage to post sometime after. I wasn’t Jonathan then, lots of pseudonyms. Juan Hulio, Colin were favourites. Getting into my first argument was pretty scary. I held my own. (Matron) Haven’t stopped since.
  • stodge said:

    Speaking of pointless suggestions and with @MoonRabbit having seemingly disappeared (posters come, posters go) my three for today's equine action - put them in a Patent or, if you have any sense, find three others:

    GUNSIGHT RIDGE 1.15 Sandown
    ARAMIS GREY 2.51 Lingfield
    THE WOLF 3.45 Musselburgh

    This exceptionally mild and dry winter (for which we will either pay with a cold wet spring or with water shortages come the summer) has left today's cards with more small fields.

    Of the 21 turf jump races being run today, only 2 have double figure fields and 12 have fewer than eight runners making each way options limited to 1-2.

    Musselburgh must be scratching their heads. As Gordon Elliott remarked yesterday, there is a £20,000 race with only three runners, and two of those are from Ireland.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,577
    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    I agree, for Sunakites, the Trussed and dark horses unknown (Wallace, Morduant, Tugenhat?) There is a risk of precipitating a contest before the ducks are in a row, vs the dilemma of missing the chance. A tricky one to time.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,760
    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    That's not quite what I was saying although it is undoubtedly connected. What was being floated by MPs on the chat was that 54 was no problem but 181 is a lot more problematic. Of course if some of the potential runners get their supporters to vote no then that does get easier.
  • I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.
  • MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,651
    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2022/feb/05/uk-flight-compensation-plan-will-slash-average-payouts

    “In theory, the changes expose the airlines to more compensation. However, the consultation acknowledges that, in reality, far fewer people will actually have the impetus to make a claim,” it said. “The net result is that the airlines will save money because passengers will be disincentivised to make a claim. If compensation is going to be reduced to such a low level then it should be paid out automatically.”

    Is there a website that collates all our wins? Like Osborne's for the PM's lies.

    https://boris-johnson-lies.com/
  • eekeek Posts: 28,304
    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
  • Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    Foxy said:

    Ashcroft plugging his book on his website which claims to be about polling - naughty. It's quite a character assassination of Carrie, with a toxic mixture of unattributed comments, unproven allegations and mealy-mouthed assertions that he wants all the best for the Johnsons and the party.

    https://mailchi.mp/lordashcroftpolls/new-research-from-lord-ashcroft-polls-449037?e=99cd3aa6df

    tldr - he dislikes Carrie. I approve of her because of the animal welfare/environment angle, and understand that there are Tories who dislike her for the same reason, as well as the usual reservations about PMs' partners having an influence. But if it was someone I disliked, I hope I'd still be against this kind of stuff, which basically just reinforces the ferrets-in-a-sack impression of the tories.

    Yes for all her foibles over interior design and love of socialising, Carrie does bring something useful to the Tories.

    Her concerns over green issues, animal welfare etc and being a couple of decades younger do match a demographic that Tories are usually anathema too. She is rather a prosecco environmentalist, but does match a younger female demographic that the Tories poll extremely badly with. The flexitarian yummy mummy vote is one the Tories need.
    The other way of looking at it is that - by focussing on these issues - she actually alienates the tories from the concerns of the 'just about managing' masses. The harm is done when it actually manifests itself in rising living costs, as the green agenda is clearly doing. For all of the yummy mummy votes they will court (a very well represented demographic), the conservatives will lose more ground to labour, apathy, and minor right wing parties amongst the unwashed masses. Bit of a problem for them, particularly in the red wall.


  • CookieCookie Posts: 13,734
    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    It's largely a south east thing - where all rail lines lead to London.
    I'd say 'down to London' and 'up to Scotland' and 'over to Sheffield'.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,412
    edited February 2022
    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    Just went and found it on Wiki. Indeed, in England the Up line runs to London (or the major destination if London is not on the route) and the Down line runs away. In Scotland the Up direction is towards Edinburgh.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
  • MrEd said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
    I think it is a bit more basic and practical than that. Trying to define which line/direction is being referred to could be problematic so basically the bigger destination was 'Up'. I do like it as it has a nice old fashioned feel to it. Even though I live directly north of London and am not a big fan of the place I still like the quirkiness of going 'up' to London.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    DougSeal said:

    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    Boris’ next big job?

    DG of the BBC?
    Editor of the Telegraph?
    Secretary General of the UN?
    Trumps running mate?

    The only thing Johnson likes more than posh 6/10s with 5 grands worth of fillers is money so I could see him following Clegg and taking the Big Tech $.

    Chief Mendacity Officer at Amazon or something.
    Working in a big corporate? You've got to be joking.
    Where is lying valued? PR. A big merchant bank. Second hand car sales?

    Boris’ future is in the US. Hopefully. He’ll coin it on the chat show lecture circuit.

    (Unless he takes advantage of his US citizenship and runs on a Trump Johnson ticket)

    Sunak should be telling him about all the money he could be earning.
    He renounced his US citizenship for tax reasons.
    Is that really true? Surely most of Boris's earnings were taxed here or in Europe, and aiui we have double taxation treaties.
    Some background in this (quite old) Guardian article about it -

    “ Boris Johnson among record number to renounce American citizenship in 2016”

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/08/boris-johnson-renounces-us-citizenship-record-2016-uk-foreign-secretary
  • Cookie said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    It's largely a south east thing - where all rail lines lead to London.
    I'd say 'down to London' and 'up to Scotland' and 'over to Sheffield'.
    After all the levelling up the govt have been doing, surely both up and down are now out of date?
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,738
    edited February 2022

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    Just went and found it on Wiki. Indeed, in England the Up line runs to London (or the major destination if London is not on the route) and the Down line runs away. In Scotland the Up direction is towards Edinburgh.
    I expect that is because the railway companies changed at the Anglo-Scottish border (actually, very close to it) before the 1923 mergers into LMS and LNER. Because 'up' and 'down' were such important descriptors of trains at signal boxes etc. - "Up 9.20 express" and so on - they wouldn't have dared to change it - there'd have been dozens of crashes when people got muddled late at night. So it's a kind of fossil, like the North British and Caledonian Hotels in Edinburgh (the former abominably renamed to 'Balmoral').
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,773
    MrEd said:

    stodge said:

    Morning all :)

    It's nice to have an occasional wallow, hippo-like, in nostalgia. I have to say OGH's bet on Obama becoming President remains one of the seminal moments in betting terms.

    With the coming of the exchanges, the nature of the betting beast has changed and trading in and out of positions has become far more the norm and as we saw with North Shropshire a few weeks ago, sharp movements in trades can provide real opportunities - as a follower of the horses for many years, I would never bet in-running as the unexpected seems almost to be the norm.

    Election nights on here are always wonderful - 2005 was much quieter but nothing will beat the drama of 2017 and @david_herdson's infamous post from the night before which I think was manna from heaven for some traders.

    What a great bet on Obama. OGH could soon be joined by @Philip_Thompson (or is @BartholomewRoberts ) re Sunak - not sure myself but would be a great call if it came off.

    I’d wish I had paid more attention to @david_herdson Re 2017, it would have saved me a lot of money!
    If you had reacted to David it would have been a bold (albeit correct) move as it really was at the very, very last moment and we were all convinced he had been hacked. His post was so out of character. He had obviously been really shocked by the eve of poll canvassing.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    edited February 2022
    kle4 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Ashcroft plugging his book on his website which claims to be about polling - naughty. It's quite a character assassination of Carrie, with a toxic mixture of unattributed comments, unproven allegations and mealy-mouthed assertions that he wants all the best for the Johnsons and the party.

    https://mailchi.mp/lordashcroftpolls/new-research-from-lord-ashcroft-polls-449037?e=99cd3aa6df

    tldr - he dislikes Carrie. I approve of her because of the animal welfare/environment angle, and understand that there are Tories who dislike her for the same reason, as well as the usual reservations about PMs' partners having an influence. But if it was someone I disliked, I hope I'd still be against this kind of stuff, which basically just reinforces the ferrets-in-a-sack impression of the tories.

    I'm not hugely impressed with Carrie Johnson.

    But she's a vast improvement on Dominic Cummings. And I think that's what hurts him the most.
    His pieces are too long for me, but has he explained why people he thinks are so useless were able to outmanuevere and sack him? I believe he attempted to explain why he was there for as long as he was when he says they were obviously so bad, but it wasn't very persuasive.
    We had the same phenomenon at the DfE.

    He thought all the civil servants there were totally useless. And actually, he was right.

    But the reforms he and Sam Freedman came up with and believes were in the teeth of Civil Service and Union opposition were the polar opposite of what he was trying to achieve. In particular, many of those same useless civil servants are now on very cushy numbers with good money as CEOs of academy trusts, which is a completely pointless role nobody would miss if it were abolished. And the exams he came up with are less reliable and less rigorous (as well as less useful as a preparation for further study) than the ones they replaced.

    I suspect, though I can't prove it,he's just rather lazy and assumes what he's ordered has been done, rather than checking, while everyone around him listens, makes hand gestures behind his back and carries on as before.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited February 2022

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    MrEd said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
    I think it is a bit more basic and practical than that. Trying to define which line/direction is being referred to could be problematic so basically the bigger destination was 'Up'. I do like it as it has a nice old fashioned feel to it. Even though I live directly north of London and am not a big fan of the place I still like the quirkiness of going 'up' to London.
    To a degree but it’s a bit more than that (hence why the phrase is used for Oxbridge both of which are not important rail junctions etc). I like it, my wife (being American) thinks it’s stupid.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,304
    edited February 2022
    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.

    It’s at times like this I suspect many MPs wish Boris hadn’t culled Rory and the others.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    kjh said:

    MrEd said:

    stodge said:

    Morning all :)

    It's nice to have an occasional wallow, hippo-like, in nostalgia. I have to say OGH's bet on Obama becoming President remains one of the seminal moments in betting terms.

    With the coming of the exchanges, the nature of the betting beast has changed and trading in and out of positions has become far more the norm and as we saw with North Shropshire a few weeks ago, sharp movements in trades can provide real opportunities - as a follower of the horses for many years, I would never bet in-running as the unexpected seems almost to be the norm.

    Election nights on here are always wonderful - 2005 was much quieter but nothing will beat the drama of 2017 and @david_herdson's infamous post from the night before which I think was manna from heaven for some traders.

    What a great bet on Obama. OGH could soon be joined by @Philip_Thompson (or is @BartholomewRoberts ) re Sunak - not sure myself but would be a great call if it came off.

    I’d wish I had paid more attention to @david_herdson Re 2017, it would have saved me a lot of money!
    If you had reacted to David it would have been a bold (albeit correct) move as it really was at the very, very last moment and we were all convinced he had been hacked. His post was so out of character. He had obviously been really shocked by the eve of poll canvassing.
    I know but those are the great calls. I’d agree in hindsight if you had piled in on his references, and it hadn’t come off….
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194

    DougSeal said:

    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    Boris’ next big job?

    DG of the BBC?
    Editor of the Telegraph?
    Secretary General of the UN?
    Trumps running mate?

    The only thing Johnson likes more than posh 6/10s with 5 grands worth of fillers is money so I could see him following Clegg and taking the Big Tech $.

    Chief Mendacity Officer at Amazon or something.
    Working in a big corporate? You've got to be joking.
    Where is lying valued? PR. A big merchant bank. Second hand car sales?

    Boris’ future is in the US. Hopefully. He’ll coin it on the chat show lecture circuit.

    (Unless he takes advantage of his US citizenship and runs on a Trump Johnson ticket)

    Sunak should be telling him about all the money he could be earning.
    He renounced his US citizenship for tax reasons.
    Is that really true? Surely most of Boris's earnings were taxed here or in Europe, and aiui we have double taxation treaties.
    No idea about Johnson specifically but Double Taxation Treaties only remove your tax obligation in one country if it is lower than the tax paid in the other. The liability is still there for the full amount of tax to be paid equivalent to the higher tax regime. Basically if you are doing things legally then you will still pay your tax to the value to the highest tax regime. When I worked in Norway I still had a tax liability for the UK but paid no UK tax because I had paid so much in Norway. But had the situation been reversed and I was a Norwegian working in the UK then I would have paid the full UK tax and then still had to pay the balance due on my Norwegian liability.
    The issue in US-UK is to do with principal private residence relief.

    In the US it is capped at $250,000 unless (in some states) the tax base is rolled over into a new in-state residence

    London capital gains in a house can be higher
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,926
    edited February 2022

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    I think in them olden days it was always going 'up' to London wherever you were, mainly posho types I believe, but it may have transferred to us lower orders as well.

    Maybe levelling up means no longer feeling one has to go up to London to reach the pinnacle of human existence in the British isles. I'm sure almost everyone would agree though that going to Wick is going up.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    DavidL said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    That's not quite what I was saying although it is undoubtedly connected. What was being floated by MPs on the chat was that 54 was no problem but 181 is a lot more problematic. Of course if some of the potential runners get their supporters to vote no then that does get easier.
    I think the 181 is difficult because it comes back to the same question namely “what now?” To get to 181, you have to get at least some ERG / RW / anti-lockdown support. None of the leading candidates have that .
  • There was always a weird paradox for the SNP on currency. To follow them you had to simultaneously accept the idea that those people down south were so repulsive that we can’t work with them anymore, but also that they were so reasonable that they would agree to a currency union.

    Now we are to believe monsters have inexhaustible generosity. Those awful people are going to relieve us of having to pay for our pensions for the foreseeable future. There will be an Ebenezer Scrooge style transformation.

    The strategic trap of the Plan B question was that on the most important issue for undecided voters, the economy, the SNP chose to hand a veto to their opponents. The UK government needed only to tell the truth - that a currency union wasn’t a goer - to destroy their campaign.

    That lesson is lost on them. This week they handed the UK government a veto over not just pensions but, given it is likely to be the central column of their whole fiscal argument, the entire economic case for independence.


    https://notesonnationalism.substack.com/p/not-pensions-again
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,958
    Was Nad's appearance this morning more or less embarrassing that eating anus?
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,958
    Is there a poll tonight? What number would trigger another raft of letters?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,606
    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.
  • I joined PB relatively late, in 2009. I stumbled across the site purely by chance when I googled "Opinion polls" in the run up to the 2010 election. Hopefully some of you might remember "GORDO-10000" and "The Wrath of Crosby" :lol:
  • MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    That's not quite what I was saying although it is undoubtedly connected. What was being floated by MPs on the chat was that 54 was no problem but 181 is a lot more problematic. Of course if some of the potential runners get their supporters to vote no then that does get easier.
    I think the 181 is difficult because it comes back to the same question namely “what now?” To get to 181, you have to get at least some ERG / RW / anti-lockdown support. None of the leading candidates have that .
    If this was really the case then Johnson would not be moving heaven and earth day and night to avoid such a vote. He could have it tomorrow and be secure for 12 months thru the local election losses (barring rules changes). By spring 2023 it is becoming too late for a new PM before GE.
  • Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,958
    Stephen Hammond, former minister and the Tory MP for Wimbledon, says he is “considering very carefully whether to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson. He says: “All Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their consciences this weekend.”
    https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1489923539603972097
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    The problem is that being able to "talk to all those groups" was based on smoke, mirrors and outright lies to cover the contradictions.

    Searching for a newly plausible liar is a fruitless task.
  • Just popping in for a sec or two. Glad to see Mr Ed is back (even tho very different views)

    A prediction based on a tiny tiny snippet of info: Johnson will be VONC'd on w/c 21st Feb and will be ousted.

    All caveats apply. Have a great w/e everyone!
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
    What about the Stranraer line? Presumably 'up' is towards Glasgow?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,304
    edited February 2022

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    Scott_xP said:

    Stephen Hammond, former minister and the Tory MP for Wimbledon, says he is “considering very carefully whether to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson. He says: “All Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their consciences this weekend.”
    https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1489923539603972097

    What about those who don't have a conscience?
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,773
    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.

    It’s at times like this I suspect many MPs wish Boris hadn’t culled Rory and the others.
    There are loads of flaws and I was going to post about them, but then I thought no, whatever you do there will be flaws, but now you have bought up the children issue I'll give it a go.

    a) We have a 2nd house. We use hardly any power. We will benefit from a reduction of council tax and after the loan will not have to pay for power for months and months

    b) My daughter is a student renting. The landlord pays the Council Tax, she pays for power and finishes in June. Huge loser, landlord winner.

    c) Council tax bands are rubbish after all this time. I checked on Rightmove after the announcement. This is from the first two houses I looked at: £800,000 band D, £650,000 band F
  • Scott_xP said:

    Stephen Hammond, former minister and the Tory MP for Wimbledon, says he is “considering very carefully whether to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson. He says: “All Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their consciences this weekend.”
    https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1489923539603972097

    Tory MPs wrestling with Tory MPs consciences. Is there a weight division below flyweight?

  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,606
    Scott_xP said:

    Stephen Hammond, former minister and the Tory MP for Wimbledon, says he is “considering very carefully whether to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson. He says: “All Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their consciences this weekend.”
    https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1489923539603972097

    That’s a new TV sport format for the new millennium! Conservative conscience wrestling, live from the NEC.

    The highlight, JRM in Lycra dancing in the ring with absolutely nothing at all.
  • eek said:

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
    I am not a fan but it is £40 a year. Will be a tiny fraction of the cost of living pressures over those years so not a big deal.
  • MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
    One of the issues that no one talks about much outside the Treasury is that as the car industry moves rapidly to electric the fuel tax take is going to crater. That's a lot of money.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
    Lifting the green levy might have been more sensible. High fossil fuel prices provide a very strong incentive to curtail energy usage in any event.
    Easier to mess around with than VAT ?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,340
    MrEd said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
    So when us northerners say we're from 'up north' we're rightly acknowledging that we're from most important place. Suits me.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2022/feb/05/uk-flight-compensation-plan-will-slash-average-payouts

    “In theory, the changes expose the airlines to more compensation. However, the consultation acknowledges that, in reality, far fewer people will actually have the impetus to make a claim,” it said. “The net result is that the airlines will save money because passengers will be disincentivised to make a claim. If compensation is going to be reduced to such a low level then it should be paid out automatically.”

    Is there a website that collates all our wins? Like Osborne's for the PM's lies.

    https://boris-johnson-lies.com/

    Isn’t it reasonable that the compensation is related to the fare paid?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,738
    Carnyx said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    Just went and found it on Wiki. Indeed, in England the Up line runs to London (or the major destination if London is not on the route) and the Down line runs away. In Scotland the Up direction is towards Edinburgh.
    I expect that is because the railway companies changed at the Anglo-Scottish border (actually, very close to it) before the 1923 mergers into LMS and LNER. Because 'up' and 'down' were such important descriptors of trains at signal boxes etc. - "Up 9.20 express" and so on - they wouldn't have dared to change it - there'd have been dozens of crashes when people got muddled late at night. So it's a kind of fossil, like the North British and Caledonian Hotels in Edinburgh (the former abominably renamed to 'Balmoral').
    Edit: I see from others this doesn't apply to ECML and WCML - would make good sense to have done it that way ab initio when the first through trains ran. Not so many of them in those days. But no need to change anything else. (Still, one would have thought the Caledonian lines would be 'up' to Glasgow, so there is more to it than that.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,304
    kjh said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.

    It’s at times like this I suspect many MPs wish Boris hadn’t culled Rory and the others.
    There are loads of flaws and I was going to post about them, but then I thought no, whatever you do there will be flaws, but now you have bought up the children issue I'll give it a go.

    a) We have a 2nd house. We use hardly any power. We will benefit from a reduction of council tax and after the loan will not have to pay for power for months and months

    b) My daughter is a student renting. The landlord pays the Council Tax, she pays for power and finishes in June. Huge loser, landlord winner.

    c) Council tax bands are rubbish after all this time. I checked on Rightmove after the announcement. This is from the first two houses I looked at: £800,000 band D, £650,000 band F
    Given that there will always be flaws - the best plan would be to do nothing and work out how to get money to those who actually need it.

    The Band A-D issue equally doesn't work but unless we scrap council tax it's never going to change as I revaluation after 30 years would be electoral suicide.

  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,582
    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
    What about the Stranraer line? Presumably 'up' is towards Glasgow?
    Unless you are leaving Oxford or Cambridge and heading to London. Then you are still going down.
  • We are cursed in the short track!
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    mwadams said:

    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
    What about the Stranraer line? Presumably 'up' is towards Glasgow?
    Unless you are leaving Oxford or Cambridge and heading to London. Then you are still going down.
    Er...how often do you go from Cambridge via Stranraer? Seems rather a long way round.

    IIRC, the correct nomenclature was said to be 'up' was any direction towards the HQ of the railway company, which in the case of England were mostly in London (the Lancashire and Yorkshire plus the Great Central in Manchester and the Midland in Derby being exceptions) but actually, that doesn't work because the Great Central at least had 'up' trains heading towards London.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,340

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    That's not quite what I was saying although it is undoubtedly connected. What was being floated by MPs on the chat was that 54 was no problem but 181 is a lot more problematic. Of course if some of the potential runners get their supporters to vote no then that does get easier.
    I think the 181 is difficult because it comes back to the same question namely “what now?” To get to 181, you have to get at least some ERG / RW / anti-lockdown support. None of the leading candidates have that .
    If this was really the case then Johnson would not be moving heaven and earth day and night to avoid such a vote. He could have it tomorrow and be secure for 12 months thru the local election losses (barring rules changes). By spring 2023 it is becoming too late for a new PM before GE.
    That's a really good point. If Johnson were really confident he'd win a VONC in the party, he'd be saying 'bring it on'. It would then lance the boil for the rest of this parliament. But instead, he's moving heaven and earth to avoid it.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194
    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    Truss is better liked than many think

    I chatted to someone the other day (backing Hunt on the grounds that he is the most suitable but doesn’t expect him to win).

    Rates Sunak, but needs longer in post. Likes Truss (“she tries really hard… and please, God, anyone but Raab”)
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,404
    eek said:

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
    As someone who is beyond the four score years, let alone three score & ten, what happens if neither I nor Mrs C makes it for another 4 years? Will it be deducted from our estate, or be on the final bill when Eldest Son winds up the estate, prior to selling the house?
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    MrEd said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
    So when us northerners say we're from 'up north' we're rightly acknowledging that we're from most important place. Suits me.
    Actually yes, it was a reaction in some ways against the idea that London was “up”
  • ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
    What about the Stranraer line? Presumably 'up' is towards Glasgow?
    Yep. My understanding from now looking into it is that a line not going to London or Edinburgh would have the 'Up' direction going towards the larger/more important destination.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    One for @ydoethur
    Iowa to introduce cameras in classrooms to livestream for all parents to see...
    https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/education/592921-iowa-introduces-bill-requiring-cameras-in-public-school?amp
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,404
    mwadams said:

    ydoethur said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    Your Grandfather was correct - as a child in Scotland it bemused me that people talked of going "up" to London when any glance at a map would show London was "down".

    In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is usually on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

    On most of the network, "up" is the direction towards London. In most of Scotland, with the exception of the West and East Coast Main Lines , and the Borders Railway, "up" is towards Edinburgh.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_directions
    What about the Stranraer line? Presumably 'up' is towards Glasgow?
    Unless you are leaving Oxford or Cambridge and heading to London. Then you are still going down.
    Even if you were not attending one or other of the higher education establishments there?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,304

    eek said:

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
    As someone who is beyond the four score years, let alone three score & ten, what happens if neither I nor Mrs C makes it for another 4 years? Will it be deducted from our estate, or be on the final bill when Eldest Son winds up the estate, prior to selling the house?
    Nope it's going to be paid by the next resident of your house.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578

    Just popping in for a sec or two. Glad to see Mr Ed is back (even tho very different views)

    A prediction based on a tiny tiny snippet of info: Johnson will be VONC'd on w/c 21st Feb and will be ousted.

    All caveats apply. Have a great w/e everyone!

    Thank you Nigel and apologies for what I said about you yesterday, I was in a bit of a bad mood.
  • DougSeal said:

    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    Boris’ next big job?

    DG of the BBC?
    Editor of the Telegraph?
    Secretary General of the UN?
    Trumps running mate?

    The only thing Johnson likes more than posh 6/10s with 5 grands worth of fillers is money so I could see him following Clegg and taking the Big Tech $.

    Chief Mendacity Officer at Amazon or something.
    Working in a big corporate? You've got to be joking.
    Where is lying valued? PR. A big merchant bank. Second hand car sales?

    Boris’ future is in the US. Hopefully. He’ll coin it on the chat show lecture circuit.

    (Unless he takes advantage of his US citizenship and runs on a Trump Johnson ticket)

    Sunak should be telling him about all the money he could be earning.
    He renounced his US citizenship for tax reasons.
    Is that really true? Surely most of Boris's earnings were taxed here or in Europe, and aiui we have double taxation treaties.
    No idea about Johnson specifically but Double Taxation Treaties only remove your tax obligation in one country if it is lower than the tax paid in the other. The liability is still there for the full amount of tax to be paid equivalent to the higher tax regime. Basically if you are doing things legally then you will still pay your tax to the value to the highest tax regime. When I worked in Norway I still had a tax liability for the UK but paid no UK tax because I had paid so much in Norway. But had the situation been reversed and I was a Norwegian working in the UK then I would have paid the full UK tax and then still had to pay the balance due on my Norwegian liability.
    The issue in US-UK is to do with principal private residence relief.

    In the US it is capped at $250,000 unless (in some states) the tax base is rolled over into a new in-state residence

    London capital gains in a house can be higher
    As an aside, are we to gather that American property taxes, at least in some states, are far higher than ours? I've a vague idea I heard that on one of those "why sports stars go bankrupt" features.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,404
    eek said:

    eek said:

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
    As someone who is beyond the four score years, let alone three score & ten, what happens if neither I nor Mrs C makes it for another 4 years? Will it be deducted from our estate, or be on the final bill when Eldest Son winds up the estate, prior to selling the house?
    Nope it's going to be paid by the next resident of your house.
    I know it's not a lot of money, but that hardly seems fair. And suppose the house stays empty for a while?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    Nigelb said:
    Not a fan. Although parents might realise their child is not quite the angel they suppose if they watch.

    But there are possibilities. How about instead we introduce live cameras at the DfE to see how drunk they're getting at the latest party?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    edited February 2022

    eek said:

    eek said:

    Jonathan said:

    The 200 pound loan did not pass the Martin Lewis test on the basis you have to pay it back whether you received it or not.

    It is not a loan. A short term subsidy (expected to be) funded by a longer term surcharge.
    Yep and complete f***ks up everyone who will be moving it their first home at any point between 2023 and 2027.

    Granted the actual amount is less than £4 a month but it's the principle and a demonstration that the Treasury aren't thinking things through - and not picking up the flaws.
    As someone who is beyond the four score years, let alone three score & ten, what happens if neither I nor Mrs C makes it for another 4 years? Will it be deducted from our estate, or be on the final bill when Eldest Son winds up the estate, prior to selling the house?
    Nope it's going to be paid by the next resident of your house.
    I know it's not a lot of money, but that hardly seems fair. And suppose the house stays empty for a while?
    The whole thing is a very stupid idea. It will not improve matters, rather it will make them much worse in the medium term.

    It's based on a double policy failure: (1) using gas and wind instead of tidal power to replace coal and nuclear (2) the energy price cap, which rather ignored what would happen when companies trying to buy fuel ran out of money.

    And while the latter was a Miliband idea, the Tories were the ones who were foolish enough to implement it.

    As for the first, they can own that entirely.
  • MrEd said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    I agree but my Grandfather who worked the railways for newspaper distribution told me that the line carrying trains towards London was always the 'Up' line. Maybe it wasn't true but that is what I always knew it as.
    The thinking was that London was the capital and therefore you were travelling ‘up’ because you were going to a more (the most) important place.

    It was the same principle why people said you went ‘up’ to Oxford and Cambridge regardless of where you lived.
    So when us northerners say we're from 'up north' we're rightly acknowledging that we're from most important place. Suits me.
    In which case can the levelling up cash be re-directed to the south? Actually scrap that, as there is no levelling up cash regardless......
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,076

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
    One of the issues that no one talks about much outside the Treasury is that as the car industry moves rapidly to electric the fuel tax take is going to crater. That's a lot of money.
    There was an MP from a select committee talking about this the on Radio 4 - either yesterday or the day before.

    The problem is that no-one trusts governments with another tax. So road pricing is electoral poison. Attempts to mandate some kind of electricity-for-vehicles tax are impossible to implement. Hydrogen has lost the domestic vehicle race....

    There are very few politically possible options - maybe even none.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 95,994
    Jonathan said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Stephen Hammond, former minister and the Tory MP for Wimbledon, says he is “considering very carefully whether to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson. He says: “All Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their consciences this weekend.”
    https://twitter.com/KevinASchofield/status/1489923539603972097

    That’s a new TV sport format for the new millennium! Conservative conscience wrestling, live from the NEC.

    The highlight, JRM in Lycra dancing in the ring with absolutely nothing at all.
    And like professional wrestling, it is all just a scripted performance.

    We are due a few more heel-face turns though.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    edited February 2022
    kjh said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.

    It’s at times like this I suspect many MPs wish Boris hadn’t culled Rory and the others.
    There are loads of flaws and I was going to post about them, but then I thought no, whatever you do there will be flaws, but now you have bought up the children issue I'll give it a go.

    a) We have a 2nd house. We use hardly any power. We will benefit from a reduction of council tax and after the loan will not have to pay for power for months and months

    b) My daughter is a student renting. The landlord pays the Council Tax, she pays for power and finishes in June. Huge loser, landlord winner.

    c) Council tax bands are rubbish after all this time. I checked on Rightmove after the announcement. This is from the first two houses I looked at: £800,000 band D, £650,000 band F
    I'm in the same position. My house is band B. But my electricity bills are less than a pound a day in winter, and gas is less than that. In summer that drops to near zero.

    Targeting me for extra money is bloody daft.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,520
    Scott_xP said:

    Is there a poll tonight? What number would trigger another raft of letters?

    While I'd be delighted with a humungous Labour lead, I'm not expecting one - my perception of the last week has been a bit meh, same stories recirculating, and that will make the lead drift down, to 6 or 7, I think - which is probably the real gap at present, major new developments excepted.

    That said, I also don't buy the idea that the local by-elections this week show anything disastrous for Labour - all of them (including the Labour gain in Lewes, mysteriously ignored by Nerys and BigG) had local factors with turnout in the teens and 20s. The reality is that most people feel the Government's in a mess and Labour seems credible but unexciting. So if there's a GE tomorrow, let's have Labour, but if it's a local by-election, why bother.

    If you're a Tory MP, the question is whether you think that this is all normal mid-term stuff and they'll pull back 6% easily enough, or worth rolling the dice with X replacing Johnson. If you don't actually care about the ethics aspect and merely want to get reelected, it's as simple as that - and probably you decide to wait and see till May.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194

    DougSeal said:

    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    Boris’ next big job?

    DG of the BBC?
    Editor of the Telegraph?
    Secretary General of the UN?
    Trumps running mate?

    The only thing Johnson likes more than posh 6/10s with 5 grands worth of fillers is money so I could see him following Clegg and taking the Big Tech $.

    Chief Mendacity Officer at Amazon or something.
    Working in a big corporate? You've got to be joking.
    Where is lying valued? PR. A big merchant bank. Second hand car sales?

    Boris’ future is in the US. Hopefully. He’ll coin it on the chat show lecture circuit.

    (Unless he takes advantage of his US citizenship and runs on a Trump Johnson ticket)

    Sunak should be telling him about all the money he could be earning.
    He renounced his US citizenship for tax reasons.
    Is that really true? Surely most of Boris's earnings were taxed here or in Europe, and aiui we have double taxation treaties.
    No idea about Johnson specifically but Double Taxation Treaties only remove your tax obligation in one country if it is lower than the tax paid in the other. The liability is still there for the full amount of tax to be paid equivalent to the higher tax regime. Basically if you are doing things legally then you will still pay your tax to the value to the highest tax regime. When I worked in Norway I still had a tax liability for the UK but paid no UK tax because I had paid so much in Norway. But had the situation been reversed and I was a Norwegian working in the UK then I would have paid the full UK tax and then still had to pay the balance due on my Norwegian liability.
    The issue in US-UK is to do with principal private residence relief.

    In the US it is capped at $250,000 unless (in some states) the tax base is rolled over into a new in-state residence

    London capital gains in a house can be higher
    As an aside, are we to gather that American property taxes, at least in some states, are far higher than ours? I've a vague idea I heard that on one of those "why sports stars go bankrupt" features.
    Annual percentage of the purchase price
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
    One of the issues that no one talks about much outside the Treasury is that as the car industry moves rapidly to electric the fuel tax take is going to crater. That's a lot of money.
    There was an MP from a select committee talking about this the on Radio 4 - either yesterday or the day before.

    The problem is that no-one trusts governments with another tax. So road pricing is electoral poison. Attempts to mandate some kind of electricity-for-vehicles tax are impossible to implement. Hydrogen has lost the domestic vehicle race....

    There are very few politically possible options - maybe even none.
    VEL, although very visible which HMRC hates
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943
    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:
    Not a fan. Although parents might realise their child is not quite the angel they suppose if they watch.

    But there are possibilities. How about instead we introduce live cameras at the DfE to see how drunk they're getting at the latest party?
    It's a seriously bad idea.
    But I fear it will be quite popular in some places.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 13,734
    Cookie said:

    Farooq said:

    I think I joined PB sometime around 2006 or 2007. Had a huge amount of fun and learnt a lot on here over the years. Still feel a bit of a fraud as I don't bet that often although I have had a few side bets with various posters over the years and come out about even over all. But still think it is by far the best place to both get the news and get exposed to proper debate and opinions I would otherwise not have really heard (or maybe more accurately listened to). Also delighted to have had a few of my thoughts published by Mike and the team so very grateful for that.

    I do intend trying to get up to London for the 2nd (I still love the old rail terminology learnt from my Grandfather that London is always 'up'). Just trying to decide whether to come up just for the evening or book a hotel for overnight.

    Really? If I was taking a train from Aberdeen I'd say I was going down to London and then back up to Scotland. It sounds totally wrong to me the other way around.
    It's largely a south east thing - where all rail lines lead to London.
    I'd say 'down to London' and 'up to Scotland' and 'over to Sheffield'.
    Really, it makes no more sense to say 'up to Edinburgh (from Manchester) as it does to say 'up to London'. Having north at the top of the map is an arbitrary convention. The places one travels 'up' to ought to be higher - so 'up' to Buxton, 'down' to Liverpool.
    This does require a more detailed topographical map of the country than most people hold in their heads, however.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,943

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    eek said:

    MrEd said:

    DavidL said:

    John Rentoul
    @JohnRentoul
    Letters Going In (LGI) latest tally.

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1489891987851517955

    I heard a plausible theory on the Adrian Chiles radio program yesterday. There is absolutley no problem in getting to 54 but those opposed to Boris do not want to trigger a contest until they think that they can win it and they are still far from confident about that so they are holding back and waiting for him to weaken. They are concerned about giving him another full year.

    I think, for all the abuse they get, we are dealing with a pretty sophisticated electorate here, well used to gaming the system.
    Johnson could throw those he saw as ringleaders out of the party and still have a Parliamentary majority, of course.

    CF Gauke, Hammond et al.
    He can’t, he hasn’t got the authority (cue Jackie Weaver).

    However, I am subscriber to the theory @DavidL puts forwards, namely BJ is there because certain sections do not want the oft mentioned alternatives, namely Sunak and Truss, but are struggling to find their own alternative. If there is one reason to be short both is the lack of Tory MPs briefing for them in the press. They don’t look to have a strong base of support.
    The problem the Tory party have is that Boris was the only person able to talk to all the different groups that the Tory party support is currently built on.

    The problem is that everyone else in a position of leadership comes from the historic “don’t spend” world while the new MPs know that without sweeties they aren’t going to be re-elected.

    So while Bozo is seriously damaged goods there isn’t any sane alternative but Bozo is now so damaged it is getting to the point where his faults are no longer ignorable.

    Yep the Tory party is a sophisticated electorate but the problem it currently faces is there is no logical leader that keeps Bozo’s coalition in place and Bozo is braking so rapidly that a replacement is going to be needed far earlier than they want.
    Yes, that’s exactly the problem. In some ways, the Conservatives are becoming a mirror image of Labour’s unstable coalition of urbanites, WWC (declining) and generally conservative ethnic minorities.

    Leaderwise, I think it’s clear Sunak and Truss don’t have the confidence of the Red Wall / ERG factions. Sunak’s energy payments look to be a way to prove he can benefit RW voters but I think (rightly) many of those MPs don’t trust him. Truss has other problems.

    The ideal situation (for them) is for the ERG / RW faction to find one of their own. That’s going to be hard to find someone who then appeals to Blue Wall Tories.
    The £200 Loan is going to be a disaster for the Tories. Why am I now paying back a “loan” I never wanted in the first place and why will my children be paying a loan they never benefited from the first place.
    He didn’t want to take off VAT because, once you’ve taken something off, it’s hard to put back on, hence a “temporary” loan. Agree though it is stupid
    One of the issues that no one talks about much outside the Treasury is that as the car industry moves rapidly to electric the fuel tax take is going to crater. That's a lot of money.
    There was an MP from a select committee talking about this the on Radio 4 - either yesterday or the day before.

    The problem is that no-one trusts governments with another tax. So road pricing is electoral poison. Attempts to mandate some kind of electricity-for-vehicles tax are impossible to implement. Hydrogen has lost the domestic vehicle race....

    There are very few politically possible options - maybe even none.
    None is not economically possible.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,340
    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:
    Not a fan. Although parents might realise their child is not quite the angel they suppose if they watch.

    But there are possibilities. How about instead we introduce live cameras at the DfE to see how drunk they're getting at the latest party?
    It's a seriously bad idea.
    But I fear it will be quite popular in some places.
    Most ideas in education are seriously bad, because they're come up with by people who don't understand education.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,194
    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:
    Not a fan. Although parents might realise their child is not quite the angel they suppose if they watch.

    But there are possibilities. How about instead we introduce live cameras at the DfE to see how drunk they're getting at the latest party?
    It's a seriously bad idea.
    But I fear it will be quite popular in some places.
    Most ideas in education are seriously bad, because they're come up with by people who don't understand education.
    How about hiring good teachers, training them, paying them attractively, giving them good support and then trusting them to get on with it?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,076
    kjh said:

    Leon said:

    I asked @NASA Administrator @SenBillNelson what he sees as his agency’s role in investigating UFOs/UAPs: “It’s a natural conclusion for me as a thinking human being … 1/

    “ … in a universe that is so large that I can’t even conceive how large, that there is not some form of life that maybe has evolved into intelligent beings?” 2/

    Could they explain some of the recent sightings by military pilots? “I’m not limiting anything,” he responded. 3/

    “I hope it’s not one of our terrestrial enemies that has that kind of technology, because that would mean that somebody is very, very advanced.” 4/

    What is it? “I don’t know.” Who’s job is it? “One of NASA’s missions is to search for life,” he said, citing the James Webb Space Telescope. “We’re not out there to say that there’s a UAP here or there.” 5/5


    https://twitter.com/bryandbender/status/1488004083298418693?s=21


    That’s the current head of NASA saying “Yeah, basically aliens”

    You are reading too much into that.

    You for a start can not assume that because there is intelligent life here that there will be elsewhere. There almost certainly is. You only have to consider the Boltzmann brain theory that it is likely, let alone through the more obvious random events that lead to evolution.

    But on the other side people do fall for the fallacy 'if it has happened here it must have happened somewhere else with the size of the Universe'. Remember the probability of it happening here is 1, as it has already happened. We can only consider it because it is after the event. Prior to that the probability may have been infinitesimally small. Consider the lottery jackpot winner. The winner doesn't say 'well I have won this week so there must be lots of other jackpot winners this week' does he. There aren't.

    And of course if they are there it doesn't mean they are here and if they are here why do they mainly pick on on nutters to buzz. The only logical conclusion to that is they are teenage aliens having a laugh.
    Then we are onto the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

    And people arguing whether it is even worth thinking about. My view is that it gives us an interesting set of parameters to quantify. And in the last few years we have started to get good numbers on eco-planets, for example.
This discussion has been closed.