politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » UKIP continues its run of losses in the latest round of cou

flightpath01 said:

CornishBlue said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:

https://twitter.com/scottishlabour/status/634772041292316672

There is so much wrong with this... I don't know where to start. Or, more to the point, where it will end.

''Having a parliament that looks like the country we seek to represent'' could be dangerous. The Hollyrood Parliament serving Tennants at 8.30 in the morning?

oxfordsimon said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:
twitter.com/scottishlabour/status/634772041292316672

I cannot see an easy system of enforcing that.
It is a noble aspiration. But I don't think legally enforceable quotas are the way to achieve it.
Having said that, she is never going to be in a position to implement it, so we needn't worry.

CopperSulphate said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:

https://twitter.com/scottishlabour/status/634772041292316672

I hope there is an even number of candidates.

CopperSulphate said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:

I hope there is an even number of candidates.

isam said:

SeanT said:

isam said:

All it takes is nutters at the extremities of each side to commit acts of violence and the match is put on to the gunpowder

I bet the victim here wasn't gunning for Sharia Law etc

https://twitter.com/dailymailuk/status/634764169124970498

Bizarre and sad. I presume this has something to do with *Rotherham*.

Yes it's very sad and horribly predictable

As Enoch said in 'the road to national suicide', all it takes is mass immigration, a tiny percentage of bad people at either extreme, and an establishment acting as conductor by pretending there is no problem

RodCrosby said:

oxfordsimon said:

logical_song said:

Jeremy Hardy, who I saw with Spike Milligan sometime in the 70s:
"...accused Labour of trying to "change the rules of a game during an election".
"The Labour Party might be trying to invite a legal challenge so that they can say 'let's just scrap the election'," Mr Hardy added. "They are so desperate that I wouldn't be surprised."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34013497

As was pointed out in an earlier thread, there is no legal challenge possible - as it is an election being run by a private club. Unless someone can find a contractual angle on it all, it is hard to see what sort of legal remedy someone might seek.

I've seen opinion that Labour may be breaking Data Protection Laws in how they handle subjects' data.

JohnO said:

DearPB said:

OT All non mainstream parties have a problem with local politics. The point about UKIP Cllrs agreeing on the park gates is well made - what would a UKIP Council look like/do? They're not bound by any over-arching principles, and they're often not plausible human beings.

Even Labour and Conservatives have a struggle finding 35 sensible people in a District/Borough to form an administration. When I was a Council Leader with 25-30 Tories in my group, if you discounted the senile, the incompetent and the dangerously right wing that left you with about 12-15 who you might allow to have any responsibility.

We have a Group of 33 (out of 60) and I've been Council leader for over five years now. Never had that problem and the quality of the team is arguably the highest since the Borough's creation in 1974.

SimonStClare said:

@Plato - I don't think it'd be possible to create a farce more absurd.

Well they could get an Elvis impersonator to announce the result…! – just saying.

Plato said:

Generally speaking - more Parties have female leaders in Scotland, whilst Plaid and Greenies are female led too.

Richard_Nabavi said:

I don't want to seem awkward, but hasn't Nicola Sturgeon already bust through any glass ceiling in Scottish politics?

SeanT said:

David_Evershed said:

CopperSulphate said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:

https://twitter.com/scottishlabour/status/634772041292316672

I hope there is an even number of candidates.

Choosing candidates on gender is a recipe for oblivion.

Quite. The appalling quality of the Labour leadership contenders is only going to get worse, as the deadening effect of All Women Shortlists kick in. Check some of the newbie female Labour MPs on Twitter. They are halfwits.

SeanT said:

BREAKING NEWS: Labour leader candidate Jeremy Corbyn has denied any association with controversial hard left Labour MP, Jeremy Corbyn. In a Channel 4 interview, the 66 year old said, "No. I did not have tea with me."
When asked why he had nonetheless spoken at an event alongside himself, Corbyn said, "I merely wanted to give me a platform I had been denied. I had no idea that I held these repugnant opinions".

AndyJS said:

The EU is going to have to set up refugee camps very soon. It can't go on like this.

http://www.channel4.com/news/macedonia-police-fire-tear-gas-at-migrants

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Irrespective of your views of the EU can anyone accept the dreadful situation in Macedonia and how can the EU and the United Nations continue to turn a blind eye. The leaders of the EU and the UN should be ashamed, get back from their holidays, and take immediate action to stop the suffering of these men, women and children. It sums up the absolute uselessness of the EU as an organisation.

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

AndyJS said:

"A gunman has injured three people on a train between Amsterdam and Paris before being overpowered by passengers, according to French rail company SNCF.
The incident happened on Friday afternoon near Arras in northern France and the assailant was arrested when the train stopped at the town's station.
Reports said French actor Jean-Hugues Anglade was among those injured."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34023361?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_breaking&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=news_central

David_Evershed said:

RodCrosby said:

oxfordsimon said:

logical_song said:

Jeremy Hardy, who I saw with Spike Milligan sometime in the 70s:
"...accused Labour of trying to "change the rules of a game during an election".
"The Labour Party might be trying to invite a legal challenge so that they can say 'let's just scrap the election'," Mr Hardy added. "They are so desperate that I wouldn't be surprised."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34013497

As was pointed out in an earlier thread, there is no legal challenge possible - as it is an election being run by a private club. Unless someone can find a contractual angle on it all, it is hard to see what sort of legal remedy someone might seek.

I've seen opinion that Labour may be breaking Data Protection Laws in how they handle subjects' data.

Using canvassing data for political purposes is not misuse of canvassing data. That is its purpose. People may make a legal challenge on that basis but they won't win and will waste their legal fees.

SeanT said:

JosiasJessop said:

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

There are times when 'crimes' fall in the gaps between laws. This is particularly true when, as in most cases, there is not a single point of failure, but a series of failures that led to the incident.

However, I would have thought the HSE (or Scottish equivalent) would have taken a firm interest. There seem several people/organisations who might be at fault in this case, perhaps including both his current and previous employers.

As an aside, there was the case where a preserved but unairworthy Victor took off at Buntingfield five or so years ago. This could very nearly have been a catastrophe, for the people inside as well as anyone on the ground, yet because it was not an aircraft - it was not registered with the authorities - and was not any other sort of vehicle (AIUI) they were not prosecuted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh2YSzBdWFg

Lucky, lucky, lucky.

On which note, I should be at the Little Gransden airshow next weekend:
http://www.littlegransdenshow.co.uk/flying.php

I feel sorry for the families of the victims. They are not getting justice. If this was my sister, wife, dad, daughter, who died, I'd want to see a trial. Who wouldn't?

No wonder relatives stormed out of the inquiry today.

JosiasJessop said:

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

There are times when 'crimes' fall in the gaps between laws. This is particularly true when, as in most cases, there is not a single point of failure, but a series of failures that led to the incident.

However, I would have thought the HSE (or Scottish equivalent) would have taken a firm interest. There seem several people/organisations who might be at fault in this case, perhaps including both his current and previous employers.

As an aside, there was the case where a preserved but unairworthy Victor took off at Buntingfield five or so years ago. This could very nearly have been a catastrophe, for the people inside as well as anyone on the ground, yet because it was not an aircraft - it was not registered with the authorities - and was not any other sort of vehicle (AIUI) they were not prosecuted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh2YSzBdWFg

Lucky, lucky, lucky.

On which note, I should be at the Little Gransden airshow next weekend:
http://www.littlegransdenshow.co.uk/flying.php

HurstLlama said:

JosiasJessop said:

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

There are times when 'crimes' fall in the gaps between laws. This is particularly true when, as in most cases, there is not a single point of failure, but a series of failures that led to the incident.

However, I would have thought the HSE (or Scottish equivalent) would have taken a firm interest. There seem several people/organisations who might be at fault in this case, perhaps including both his current and previous employers.

As an aside, there was the case where a preserved but unairworthy Victor took off at Buntingfield five or so years ago. This could very nearly have been a catastrophe, for the people inside as well as anyone on the ground, yet because it was not an aircraft - it was not registered with the authorities - and was not any other sort of vehicle (AIUI) they were not prosecuted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh2YSzBdWFg

Lucky, lucky, lucky.

On which note, I should be at the Little Gransden airshow next weekend:
http://www.littlegransdenshow.co.uk/flying.php

Talking of airshows, Mr. J., I was thinking seriously about the Duxford BoB show on 19/20 September. Might you be tempted?

Plato said:

https://twitter.com/Bruciebabe/status/634798655535468546

JosiasJessop said:

HurstLlama said:

JosiasJessop said:

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

There are times when 'crimes' fall in the gaps between laws. This is particularly true when, as in most cases, there is not a single point of failure, but a series of failures that led to the incident.

However, I would have thought the HSE (or Scottish equivalent) would have taken a firm interest. There seem several people/organisations who might be at fault in this case, perhaps including both his current and previous employers.

As an aside, there was the case where a preserved but unairworthy Victor took off at Buntingfield five or so years ago. This could very nearly have been a catastrophe, for the people inside as well as anyone on the ground, yet because it was not an aircraft - it was not registered with the authorities - and was not any other sort of vehicle (AIUI) they were not prosecuted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh2YSzBdWFg

Lucky, lucky, lucky.

On which note, I should be at the Little Gransden airshow next weekend:
http://www.littlegransdenshow.co.uk/flying.php

Talking of airshows, Mr. J., I was thinking seriously about the Duxford BoB show on 19/20 September. Might you be tempted?

I might, although Duxford airshows are best seen from a friend's back garden, which is somewhat worryingly on the approach path. Along with a barbecue and copious beer

That's the BoB anniversay one isn't it? If so, I might put aside from dislike of crowds long enoguh to attend, particularly in the company of someone who is interested in history, London, politics and llamas ...

HurstLlama said:

JosiasJessop said:

HurstLlama said:

JosiasJessop said:

SeanT said:

AndyJS said:

It still astonishes me that the Scottish authorities have decided not to prosecute the bin lorry driver. Thank goodness for the option of being able to bring a private prosecution.

It is mind boggling. FFS he crushed half a dozen people. He clearly lied about his medical condition. And today he refused to answer questions in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34016267

Is they're something we're all missing? Is Scottish justice that different, that feeble?

There are times when 'crimes' fall in the gaps between laws. This is particularly true when, as in most cases, there is not a single point of failure, but a series of failures that led to the incident.

However, I would have thought the HSE (or Scottish equivalent) would have taken a firm interest. There seem several people/organisations who might be at fault in this case, perhaps including both his current and previous employers.

As an aside, there was the case where a preserved but unairworthy Victor took off at Buntingfield five or so years ago. This could very nearly have been a catastrophe, for the people inside as well as anyone on the ground, yet because it was not an aircraft - it was not registered with the authorities - and was not any other sort of vehicle (AIUI) they were not prosecuted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh2YSzBdWFg

Lucky, lucky, lucky.

On which note, I should be at the Little Gransden airshow next weekend:
http://www.littlegransdenshow.co.uk/flying.php

Talking of airshows, Mr. J., I was thinking seriously about the Duxford BoB show on 19/20 September. Might you be tempted?

I might, although Duxford airshows are best seen from a friend's back garden, which is somewhat worryingly on the approach path. Along with a barbecue and copious beer

That's the BoB anniversay one isn't it? If so, I might put aside from dislike of crowds long enoguh to attend, particularly in the company of someone who is interested in history, London, politics and llamas ...

I hoped you might say that. Should be a good day out and even if the weather is crap there are enough under cover exhibits to visit in between beers. Once I have confirmed permission from Herself (she will worry about me getting back across London on my own after dark) I'll drop you a PM.

Any other PBers fancy a PBMeet with a twist?

MyBurningEars said:

Plato said:

https://twitter.com/Bruciebabe/status/634798655535468546

I don't understand the point of asking for gender. Asking for their preferred mode of address should be enough. And it is true that transgender people, however few in numbers they may be, find this kind of thing unnecessarily insulting.

SeanT said:

MJW said:

It is difficult to make up, here's 'poets for Corbyn' - possibly the only poetry anthology William McGonagall would've improved.

http://www.berfrois.com/uploads/2015/08/poets_for_corybn_v2_cover3.pdf

Fuck me, that's brilliantly bad. Weirdly, I was with two poet friends on Wednesday night - and both were Corbynista.

I love some of the stanzas in that collection:

with a common

defence policy

foreign policy

Beautiful. I particularly like the way the writer indented lines 2 and 3, so you know it's poetry, and not some hideously embarrassing sixth form wibbling.

oxfordsimon said:

calum said:

Following on from Kezia's announcement that she's proposing to make it a legal requirement that Holyrood has a 50 - 50 gender balance, she's today announced that 50% of the new SLAB candidates are going to be female:

https://twitter.com/scottishlabour/status/634772041292316672

I cannot see an easy system of enforcing that.

It is a noble aspiration. But I don't think legally enforceable quotas are the way to achieve it.

Having said that, she is never going to be in a position to implement it, so we needn't worry.

MJW said:

SeanT said:

MJW said:

It is difficult to make up, here's 'poets for Corbyn' - possibly the only poetry anthology William McGonagall would've improved.

http://www.berfrois.com/uploads/2015/08/poets_for_corybn_v2_cover3.pdf

Fuck me, that's brilliantly bad. Weirdly, I was with two poet friends on Wednesday night - and both were Corbynista.

I love some of the stanzas in that collection:

with a common

defence policy

foreign policy

Beautiful. I particularly like the way the writer indented lines 2 and 3, so you know it's poetry, and not some hideously embarrassing sixth form wibbling.

There's almost certainly a cringey comedy in 'radical' poets. Living in Liverpool recently for work had a local which generally had extremely good bands on (at least those topping the bill), but occasionally you'd get someone who thought it was a good idea to do spoken word poetry. I'm sure you can imagine that it wasn't unlike that particular tome but with more interminable pauses. A particular nadir which had the barmaid and I almost in fits was a 15 minute poem (with an interval!) which went through the name of every notable Pope from the 5th century to the present day. It would've been impressive, but the entire point of the exercise appeared to be to make the vague and slightly repetitive point that the 'performer' didn't much like religion. It even had a chorus which rhymed 'Pope' with 'Hide all your dope'.

On that particular collection - it's the unmetrical in praise of the unelectable. 'Coat' is IMHO the most glaringly awful, while 'Austerity' the most Sixth-former.

Plato said:

Well quite. It's easy, tick the box that you define as. Whatever your genitals are right now.

JEO said:

MyBurningEars said:

Plato said:

https://twitter.com/Bruciebabe/status/634798655535468546

I don't understand the point of asking for gender. Asking for their preferred mode of address should be enough. And it is true that transgender people, however few in numbers they may be, find this kind of thing unnecessarily insulting.

Reminds me of this:

"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m fucking retarded but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache” and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding."

kle4 said:

Plato said:

htps://twitter.com/A_Liberty_Rebel/status/634684709608493056

Corbyn actually comes across as more reasonable than the chap from the Guardian at the beginning, quite frankly, for all I don't agree with his core premise. Corbyn seems to be calling for negotiation and implying we'd be better off without the place, that chap seems actively offended by our presence there. (Corbyn may believe the same for all I know, but it wasn't as obvious if he does think that)

The problem I have with his argument, and the pretensions of the Argentines, is this idea that by refusing to negotiate we are the ones ratcheting up tensions, or 'upping the ante' as he terms it - when really all we're doing is not, at present and I hope in future, changing our position to suit them. If they respond aggressively to escalate as a result of that, thankfully only with words these days, that is purely their choice, not ours, it is not our fault or responsibility if the other party respond inappropriately because we refuse to engage with them, even if them getting angry about it is perfectly reasonable, diplomatically.

It's the same problem as with his automatic 'talk not war' position, which naturally most people support as a starting position, but which isn't always viable. If our position and the Argentine position are impossible to reconcile, there's no point sitting down to talk about it. We are both entitled to be stubborn and see who will bend first. If either side responds with aggression, then they are morally more dubious and can hardly protest, sincerely, that we regard them as forfeiting any expectation we will modulate our position first to accommodate them.

SeanT said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

foxinsoxuk said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

Irrespective of your views of the EU can anyone accept the dreadful situation in Macedonia and how can the EU and the United Nations continue to turn a blind eye. The leaders of the EU and the UN should be ashamed, get back from their holidays, and take immediate action to stop the suffering of these men, women and children. It sums up the absolute uselessness of the EU as an organisation.

Macedonia is not in the EU.

In what way would changing the structure or policies of the EU help with the migrant crisis?

Macedonia is on the route to Europe where they all want to go. The EU and member Countries need to deal with this. They just keep coming and increasing by the tens of thousands. Are you really suggesting we all close our eyes and walk on the other side.

What do you suggest? We can't let them all in. The only answer in the end is the tough Australian approach. We will just send you back. No matter how hard you try, or how sad your story, we will just send you back. We will also sink the boats and jail the traffickers for 40 years. Eventually they will stop coming.

This must be married with a very generous attitude to aid for the nations whence they come.

There are potentially, at least, 200m million Africans and Arabs who would love to live in Europe. If we let them all in Europe would be destroyed.

david_herdson said:

kle4 said:

Plato said:

htps://twitter.com/A_Liberty_Rebel/status/634684709608493056

Corbyn actually comes across as more reasonable than the chap from the Guardian at the beginning, quite frankly, for all I don't agree with his core premise. Corbyn seems to be calling for negotiation and implying we'd be better off without the place, that chap seems actively offended by our presence there. (Corbyn may believe the same for all I know, but it wasn't as obvious if he does think that)

The problem I have with his argument, and the pretensions of the Argentines, is this idea that by refusing to negotiate we are the ones ratcheting up tensions, or 'upping the ante' as he terms it - when really all we're doing is not, at present and I hope in future, changing our position to suit them. If they respond aggressively to escalate as a result of that, thankfully only with words these days, that is purely their choice, not ours, it is not our fault or responsibility if the other party respond inappropriately because we refuse to engage with them, even if them getting angry about it is perfectly reasonable, diplomatically.

It's the same problem as with his automatic 'talk not war' position, which naturally most people support as a starting position, but which isn't always viable. If our position and the Argentine position are impossible to reconcile, there's no point sitting down to talk about it. We are both entitled to be stubborn and see who will bend first. If either side responds with aggression, then they are morally more dubious and can hardly protest, sincerely, that we regard them as forfeiting any expectation we will modulate our position first to accommodate them.

Indeed. Presumably he would have been delighted with the outcome of Munich and would have called for a new dialogue over Poland and Danzig.

EPG said:

david_herdson said:

kle4 said:

Plato said:

htps://twitter.com/A_Liberty_Rebel/status/634684709608493056

Corbyn actually comes across as more reasonable than the chap from the Guardian at the beginning, quite frankly, for all I don't agree with his core premise. Corbyn seems to be calling for negotiation and implying we'd be better off without the place, that chap seems actively offended by our presence there. (Corbyn may believe the same for all I know, but it wasn't as obvious if he does think that)

The problem I have with his argument, and the pretensions of the Argentines, is this idea that by refusing to negotiate we are the ones ratcheting up tensions, or 'upping the ante' as he terms it - when really all we're doing is not, at present and I hope in future, changing our position to suit them. If they respond aggressively to escalate as a result of that, thankfully only with words these days, that is purely their choice, not ours, it is not our fault or responsibility if the other party respond inappropriately because we refuse to engage with them, even if them getting angry about it is perfectly reasonable, diplomatically.

It's the same problem as with his automatic 'talk not war' position, which naturally most people support as a starting position, but which isn't always viable. If our position and the Argentine position are impossible to reconcile, there's no point sitting down to talk about it. We are both entitled to be stubborn and see who will bend first. If either side responds with aggression, then they are morally more dubious and can hardly protest, sincerely, that we regard them as forfeiting any expectation we will modulate our position first to accommodate them.

Indeed. Presumably he would have been delighted with the outcome of Munich and would have called for a new dialogue over Poland and Danzig.

Which of course were handed over in the end to Soviet domination, so for all they knew in '39, it made little difference to fight...

SouthamObserver said:

Brave and polite, a radical soul
Jezza believes in coal not dole
He'll embrace as comrades murderers and villains
Just as long as they are anti-Americans

Boom, boom

Plato said:

Well quite. It's easy, tick the box that you define as. Whatever your genitals are right now.

JEO said:

MyBurningEars said:

Plato said:

https://twitter.com/Bruciebabe/status/634798655535468546

I don't understand the point of asking for gender. Asking for their preferred mode of address should be enough. And it is true that transgender people, however few in numbers they may be, find this kind of thing unnecessarily insulting.

Reminds me of this:

"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m fucking retarded but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache” and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding."