politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Another 3 polls have it neck and neck on MegaPollingWednesd

Final @ComResPolls poll for @DailyMailUK
Con 35% (NC)
Lab 34% (+2)
Lib Dem 9% (NC)
UKIP 12% (-2)
Green 4% (NC)
Others 6% (NC)
0
Final @ComResPolls poll for @DailyMailUK
Con 35% (NC)
Lab 34% (+2)
Lib Dem 9% (NC)
UKIP 12% (-2)
Green 4% (NC)
Others 6% (NC)
Comments
Seems to me that the PastVoteWeighting is boosting the UKIP total in the polls more than is justified. Just because someone voted UKIP in the Euro's doesn;t mean that translates to the GE.
Fact to remember: In most recent Ashcroft in #GreatYarmouth, for example, the raw data [over 1000 respondents] saw Tory Brandon Lewis was 7pts ahead of Labour. After adjusting for Past Vote Weighting from the Kippers, Lewis was deducted 5pts leaving him just 2 ahead of Labour. But Labour wasn't deducted any points at all.
That's bonkers!
Last year in the Council elections, where they elect in thirds, 13 seats were up for grabs. UKIP scooped 10 of them on the back of the EU elections. But the 10 were taken equally from Cons [5] and Labour [5]. So why did the Tories get penalised and not Labour in this Bellwether seat?
Undoubtedly people have voted UKIP in the [recent] past in relatively inconsequential elections but there's no way the extent of that support is mirrored in the General Election polling. My observable doorstep experience is that UKIP support is evaporating in this seaside borough. Helped by a 48% reduction in local unemployment.
But the Past Vote Weighting wrt UKIP seems to have several problems
1 It treats a previous UKIP vote in the council or Euro elections equally with the General Election - a heroic assumption
2 The experience in the marginal seat polling is that the past-vote-weighting is deducted exclusively from the Tory with none from Labour. Just not credible
So my instinct from all this is that UKIP has been methodologically overstated based on recent voting in council areas where they elect in thirds. And that over-statement has been disproportionately in favour Labour, not the Tories for reasons I can't understand.
That's what'll come out of the wash-up when the pollsters work out what went wrong.
BTW, had a nice chat with fmr senior exec of IpsosMori up here in bandit country last week. Lots of stories. NSFW.
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
Amid inevitable LibDem losses, don't forget to look out for 4 possible gains: Montgomeryshire, Maidstone, Watford, Oxford West & Abingdon.
Expected something devastating, but it simply never happened.
Lynton I salute you!
Their candidate was such an annoying t*t when he was a columnist.
But basically, they just haven't spread the spoils of recovery around enough. If they'd thrown a few more crumbs to ordinary folk they could have cruised to a majority.
Should have been talking about the economy. Instead went for Ed as a person.
Idiot.
UKIP influence, directly or indirectly.
Dave 2.02
Edm 2.00
http://sports.betfair.com/Index.do?mi=116758783&ex=1&origin=MRL
peter_from_putney said:
Many thanks for that and good luck ..... you deserve it!
Will you be at the count and declaration btw?
Yes, Peter. But the votes don't start counting until 2.00 am though, so says my notification letter! Yawn.....and that is without recounts!
Instead they went negative and sent their press pack out to "Kinnockise" a fundamentally competent, decent man in Ed Miliband.
Epic fail.
I think Labour may have a very, very outside chance of a gain in Gravesham.
Tom Newton Dunn ✔ @tnewtondunn
Media Standards Trust say Daily Mirror is the most partisan paper. Oddly, @campbellclaret isn't moaning about that; http://www.sunnation.co.uk/the-labour-sup
Best thing you tweeted for a while.
Damn right - Hodges clones like Kelner were predicting 6 point Tory leads!
Anyway, where is my £500,000 I'm off to Aus.
Exactly - you think they would have learned their lesson from how they treated Brown.
Instead of simply arguing he wasn't up to it - they attacked for writing discrete letters to family soldiers. Cretins
Breaking double figures tomorrow will be an achievement.
And that is just seats :-)
He has earned over £1.5 Million! from the Tories.
10:28PM
I reckon Dave next PM on Betfair lasts less than next 60mins.
LAB most seats at 4.9 will tighten too
bigjohnowls Posts: 4,485
10:30PM
Should have said 6 mins its CROSSOVER already
BJO main forecast is EICIPM will that be right too!!!
Con 302 (-2) .. Lab 251 (+2) .. LibDem 28 (NC) .. SNP 42 (NC) .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. UKIP 3 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 0 .. Speaker 1
Conservatives 24 seats short of a majority
Turnout Projection .. 68% (+0.5)
Surely this should be the leader all these other "so called polls" are worthless.
Share
Lab 34 (+2) Con 34 (-1) LibD 9 (-2) UKIP 13 (+1)
Seats
Lab 289 (+23) Con 272 (-15) SNP 48 (-) LibD 20 (-7) UKIP 1 (-) Grn 1 (-) PC 1 (-1)
Going bullish on Lab after zero swingback.
As a Tory majority gets revealed, the pollsters shrug and say "25% of them did change their minds. We got that right! Yay for us..."
For 50 years Labour lie about Tory intentions towards the NHS at elections. The Wales vs England comparison would have killed Labours favourite narrative stone dead.
What makes her such poor company?
I know she's a CCHQ pushed A-lister. They're doing the same this time too, in safe seats, just under the radar.
The nickname for my local Tory candidate (in ultra-safe Hampshire NE) is Mr. Party Line.
It is a pity they are crap at government historically.
The one concern with the polls all coalescing at a tie or there abouts is that while it is very pretty, when something looks too good to be true it usually is too good to be true. could they be in for a roasting?
Why of why of why didn't they just run a boring campaign on the economy.
5.5.15 LAB 287 (288) CON 272(272) (Ed is crap is PM)
https://www.twitter.com/HaggisEye/status/596066298628546560
very good
I've read predictions of 13,000.
Now assuming that these were anti-Conservative votes and spread over say 100 constituencies that would be 130 votes for each one.
Which would be enough to cost the Conservatives about 3 to 5 MPs.
Then dropping them just to get the dogs breakfast through as you couldn't be seen to fail at that.
It was a massive political folly.
When you paying me that meal you owe me. Ed is still leader. And its voting time.
You lost!
I don't agree with any of it, but just saying, we are no were near the level of dancing on Thatcher grave stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogt6njXU9Cg