Punters unmoved by YouGov showing Labour dropping into the 30s – politicalbetting.com
Comments
-
I know we did this poll earlier
@SamCoatesSky
Sky News / YouGov exclusive poll
** Tories joint lowest VI share in Parliament
** Reform just ONE point behind
** Lab down 3; LD up 4
LAB 38% (-3),
CON 18% (-1),
RefUK 17% (+1),
LDEM 15% (+4),
GRN 8% (+1)
Fieldwork Mon/Tue (around Lib Dem manfiesto coverage)
but did we do this bit
@DrAlanWager
This, plugged into the FT's model (which does not explicitly try to guess at how tactical voters will split), gives the Lib Dems over 100 seats and the Conservative Party 31.
https://x.com/DrAlanWager/status/18005648413521883111 -
… .Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson0 -
A longtime Tory candidate for Torbay posted on the site for a while. Marcus Wood? That may have been his name.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.1 -
Manifestos are like budgets...they unravel over time.MoonRabbit said:
The “I” has gone gentle on Sunak’s Manifesto too. Tories getting away with all that dodgy maths.MoonRabbit said:FT going nice and gentle are Sunak’s manifesto as big Front Page splash. I thought they would have focused more harshly on the dodgy revenue schemes. Perhaps they would have done if he was 20 points ahead?
1 -
Pity about the Lords.Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.0 -
This is the FT election tool.Scott_xP said:I know we did this poll earlier
@SamCoatesSky
Sky News / YouGov exclusive poll
** Tories joint lowest VI share in Parliament
** Reform just ONE point behind
** Lab down 3; LD up 4
LAB 38% (-3),
CON 18% (-1),
RefUK 17% (+1),
LDEM 15% (+4),
GRN 8% (+1)
Fieldwork Mon/Tue (around Lib Dem manfiesto coverage)
but did we do this bit
@DrAlanWager
This, plugged into the FT's model (which does not explicitly try to guess at how tactical voters will split), gives the Lib Dems over 100 seats and the Conservative Party 31.
https://x.com/DrAlanWager/status/1800564841352188311
https://ig.ft.com/uk-general-election/2024/projection/
It gives Lab 479, LD 101, Con 31, SNP 16 with those YouGov figures.1 -
You are making the error of thinking voters are rational.Sean_F said:
Why would centrist Tories support a party to the left of Labour?Cleitophon said:If I were Sunak I would begin to worry that centrist tories are jumping ship to lib dems to ensure they become opposition and that their vote isn't wasted. That is the other story to complement reform crossing over... what happens this coming week could decide if it is Canada 93 or not.
1 -
Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
😤.Benpointer said:
Honestly MoonRabbit, I didn't understand your post. I wanted to - I'm interested in what you have to say - but it made no sense to me at all. Sorry.MoonRabbit said:
You bastards.Benpointer said:
Ah, thanks - all makes perfect sense now.Farooq said:
Allow meBenpointer said:
Anyone else understand this? No? Me neither.MoonRabbit said:
😌 No.HYUFD said:
Except on tonight's Yougov it is Labour voters going LD, hence Labour down now even below Corbyn 2017 levels and Starmer Labour a full 5% below the 43% for Blair's New Labour in 1997.Cleitophon said:If I were Sunak I would begin to worry that centrist tories are jumping ship to lib dems to ensure they become opposition and that their vote isn't wasted. That is the other story to complement reform crossing over... what happens this coming week could decide if it is Canada 93 or not.
Tories meanwhile still ahead of Reform even with Yougov
Simply how do you see TV impacting the PV? Nothing?
It was an LLG of 61. Labour will be biggest benefliciaries of TV, even getting Ref TV to get the Tories out. Lib Dem’s will draw TC from Greens and Labour, perhaps up to 16% PV. Greens won’t get TV and will be squeezed.
So green 4 Lib Dem 14 Labour 43 = 61. And that’s even no Ref to Labour TV, taking Labour above 43, even higher still if you think after TV greens don’t get 4 and Lib Dem 14.
Simply how do you see TV [tricuspid valve] impacting the PV [pole vault]? Nothing?
It was an LLG [lymphoma low grade] of 61. Labour will be biggest benefliciaries [beneficiaries] of TV [tunnel vision], even getting Ref [reflux] TV [turkey vulture] to get the Tories out. Lib [library] Dem [demand]’s will draw TC [tai chi] from Greens and Labour, perhaps up to 16% PV [peripheral vision]. Greens won’t get TV [tidal volume] and will be squeezed.
So green 4 Lib [Libra] Dem [demon] 14 Labour 43 = 61. And that’s even no Ref [refractory] to Labour TV [Treaty of Versailles], taking Labour above 43, even higher still if you think after TV [transitive verb] greens don’t get 4 and Lib [Liberal] Dem [Democrats] 14.0 -
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it1 -
Albania is cheap and the locals are friendly (they appear to have exported their criminals). Kosovo also nice, but no beaches. Poland and the Baltics are getting more expensive.Leon said:
Not true. You can do Eastern Europe and it’s cheap away from the Med. And often lovelycarnforth said:
If you've never travelled for more than a couple of weeks, bugger off now for a couple of months and see if it palls. £1500 all in per month doable short haul if you pick the right places - airbnb places often have low monthly rates, so it pays not to move too often. Of course you have picked the wrong time of year, price-wise, for the wanderlust.kyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.0 -
By sharing
They took longer than the Tories took to choose Sunak. Maybe that’s a good thing.Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it
0 -
Didn't tissueprice post under that name long before he ran for Parliament?Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
ISTR, he announced he'd been adopted as a candidate on here. And only then was I aware of his IRL name. Similar to Rochdale.1 -
I agree but a constitutional change by the HoC overriding a referendum vote? Are you ok with that principle?Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
Same approach could be applied to Re-join.0 -
Always dangerous to be complacent about this sort of thing but as an Arsenal fan, I’m delighted with that news.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it1 -
It's not even necessarily irrational.rcs1000 said:
You are making the error of thinking voters are rational.Sean_F said:
Why would centrist Tories support a party to the left of Labour?Cleitophon said:If I were Sunak I would begin to worry that centrist tories are jumping ship to lib dems to ensure they become opposition and that their vote isn't wasted. That is the other story to complement reform crossing over... what happens this coming week could decide if it is Canada 93 or not.
FPTP encourages a "what's the best way of kicking the party I don't like?" approach.
That isn't automatically wrong, but it's not always pretty.1 -
I've always found it hard to believe that Snowflake was whom I've heard it rumoured she was, considering that when she was active I'd have thought she'd have been at her most busy to have much time to be active on PB. Would have thought she'd have had more available time while the Tories have been office but silence in that period, seems odd.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.1 -
The only way to get electoral reform is to get a hung Parliament first. No government with an overall majority will ever volunteer to give it up. I wish it were otherwise, but them's the facts!Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
1 -
Tories treated like Liberal Democrats?MoonRabbit said:
The “I” has gone gentle on Sunak’s Manifesto too. Tories getting away with all that dodgy maths.MoonRabbit said:FT going nice and gentle are Sunak’s manifesto as big Front Page splash. I thought they would have focused more harshly on the dodgy revenue schemes. Perhaps they would have done if he was 20 points ahead?
It ain't gonna happen so it ain't worth scrutinising closely.2 -
No other obvious candidate, so yesFrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
A new Labour government could try to do things differently.SouthamObserver said:
The only way to get electoral reform is to get a hung Parliament first. No government with an overall majority will ever volunteer to give it up. I wish it were otherwise, but them's the facts!Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.2 -
I am presuming that the manager Man Utd really wanted turned them down.tlg86 said:
Always dangerous to be complacent about this sort of thing but as an Arsenal fan, I’m delighted with that news.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
I’m a powerful man. Just look how stiff my willie is.FrancisUrquhart said:When we start to list them, there has been rather a lot of sex scandals that have ended MPs careers in recent years.
0 -
Except Ten Hag miraculously, at the very last moment, kept them in Europe.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it1 -
Rural moldova, rural Bulgaria, inland Montenegro, rural Romania, mainland Greece is particularly stunning. And cheap. And sunnyJohnLilburne said:
Albania is cheap and the locals are friendly (they appear to have exported their criminals). Kosovo also nice, but no beaches. Poland and the Baltics are getting more expensive.Leon said:
Not true. You can do Eastern Europe and it’s cheap away from the Med. And often lovelycarnforth said:
If you've never travelled for more than a couple of weeks, bugger off now for a couple of months and see if it palls. £1500 all in per month doable short haul if you pick the right places - airbnb places often have low monthly rates, so it pays not to move too often. Of course you have picked the wrong time of year, price-wise, for the wanderlust.kyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.
And go to Ukraine if you want magnificent cities and a unique experience (and the odd drone and air raid siren). Lviv and Odessa are world class. Kyiv is fascinating for a few days. Smaller towns like chernivtsi are beguiling, too
That’s life sorted til October when the weather turns. Then you move on to Asia1 -
Actually I don't think they could.Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
The sovereign will not be happy about such a massive constitutional change without a manifesto commitment and nor would the Lords.
0 -
The Independent is all excited by the manifesto on its front page “PM invokes spirit of Thatcher, with NI cuts and right to buy”.dixiedean said:
Tories treated like Liberal Democrats?MoonRabbit said:
The “I” has gone gentle on Sunak’s Manifesto too. Tories getting away with all that dodgy maths.MoonRabbit said:FT going nice and gentle are Sunak’s manifesto as big Front Page splash. I thought they would have focused more harshly on the dodgy revenue schemes. Perhaps they would have done if he was 20 points ahead?
It ain't gonna happen so it ain't worth scrutinising closely.
The Telegraph certainly loves it, especially the right to buy scheme.
Daily Mail has Rishi awarding Aspiration. At last the “A” word Tories should be fighting on.
Maybe we all misjudged what a success this manifesto has been?0 -
We need Louisiana style literacy tests.SandyRentool said:Anecdote demonstrating the clueleseness of some voters:
30 year old spouse of one of my colleagues: "So we get to vote for who we want as Prime Minister?"0 -
Was just done with the PPC and Mayoral voting system.Benpointer said:
I agree but a constitutional change by the HoC overriding a referendum vote? Are you ok with that principle?Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
Same approach could be applied to Re-join.
It isn't a Constitutional change. It's a voting system change.
Not the same thing. At all.3 -
In the European equivalent of the League Cup. Sunak miraculously keeps Tories in second place....otherwise its European UEFA Conference League for those in 3rd, where even fans don't watch the games.dixiedean said:
Except Ten Hag miraculously, at the very last moment, kept them in Europe.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
Would she have a veto on his appointment?ohnotnow said:
Given how much she supposedly despises him, that'd tickle me a little.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson0 -
Do they stop voting for lunch between 12.00 and 2.30?FrancisUrquhart said:
Its very French, why just have one day of elections, when you can have two.Pro_Rata said:So, France.
I read up and their Assembly elections are quite electorally interesting in that they are similar but different to the presidential election.
That is, they are done in 2 rounds, but where a run off is needed, any candidate getting 12.5% of the total electoral, so turnout and vote share dependent, gets in the run off.
It's not front and centre in the write ups of previous elections, but I guess that, differently to the presidential election, there end up being a lot of 3 way (or more) contests in the second round, and the balance of party strengths and the number of 3 ways happening has a big effect on the result -mainly 3(+) ways suits RN better, mainly 2 ways suits Macron. And it looks a pretty 3 way tussle this go.
(Don't know why they don't just go STV on the same constituencies tbh, for this type of contest certainly.)
Is that a fair assessment and has 2-way / 3-way influenced the course of past elections?
(I'm avoiding ribald analogies here)
0 -
.
Not Allegra Austin ?rcs1000 said:
I believe the story is about children, kittens, half a jar of peanut butter and a 1972 Austin Allegra.Mexicanpete said:
I have no idea what the story might be.Some hints without allegations might be helpful.Dumbosaurus said:FrancisUrquhart said:
Staines keep teasing an October Surprise event.Stuartinromford said:
Twenty three days left, though fewer for postal voters. And soon, the football will take over the national attention, except for viewers in Wales.BartholomewRoberts said:
Not really.Tweedledee said:NOM is *lengthening* like crazy. Science is powerless to explain this.
With the polls as they are, every day that passes should see NOM lengthen until its in the hundreds or a thousand.
There's less and less time available for "events" to prevent a Labour majority from happening, and even a polling error would just be changing the size of the majority as it stands not the fact of one.
What's left in the dairy that might allow a black swan to land?
Labour's manifesto launch.
The BBC head to head debate.
Anything else?
If its true, who knows, if it will make any difference, again who knows. Has he had a really killer story that changed political narrative in recent years, I don't think he has.
I am not sure the Tory leaning media heart is even in it. There are plenty of awkward comments that Labour figures, including Starmer, have made in the past. In previous election, they would be running them left, right and centre, instead they are minor stories tucked away on the websites. While the Speccy seems very keen to boot Sunak up the arse.
It's pretty obvious what the story is. If the tories are stupid enough to use it then it'll backfire within a couple of days. All the mysterious prominent senior Labour figure with legal training has to say is that his private life remains private. And meanwhile a mysterious junior Labour figure will leak far more damaging nepotism allegations about equally senior (in the near past) Tory figures and the electorate will be reminded what this election is about.
After Johnson's behaviour it is not easy to see any scandal having too much traction unless it involves children or kittens.0 -
With SpursFrancisUrquhart said:
In the European equivalent of the League Cup.dixiedean said:
Except Ten Hag miraculously, at the very last moment, kept them in Europe.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
0 -
I can’t imagine that being your line in 2019!HYUFD said:
Except on tonight's Yougov it is Labour voters going LD, hence Labour down now even below Corbyn 2017 levels and Starmer Labour a full 5% below the 43% for Blair's New Labour in 1997.Cleitophon said:If I were Sunak I would begin to worry that centrist tories are jumping ship to lib dems to ensure they become opposition and that their vote isn't wasted. That is the other story to complement reform crossing over... what happens this coming week could decide if it is Canada 93 or not.
Tories meanwhile still ahead of Reform even with Yougov1 -
Exactly...Big_G_NorthWales said:
With SpursFrancisUrquhart said:
In the European equivalent of the League Cup.dixiedean said:
Except Ten Hag miraculously, at the very last moment, kept them in Europe.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
I wish that were so - but why would a Labour government with a big majority legislate to give that up?Andy_JS said:
A new Labour government could try to do things differently.SouthamObserver said:
The only way to get electoral reform is to get a hung Parliament first. No government with an overall majority will ever volunteer to give it up. I wish it were otherwise, but them's the facts!Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
0 -
Biden is now essentially incoherent. Someone needs to intervene. This is NOW - how can he possibly be president for 4 more years??
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1800628158317867337?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw1 -
We're not in EFTA.FrancisUrquhart said:
In the European equivalent of the League Cup. Sunak miraculously keeps Tories in second place....otherwise its European UEFA Conference League for those in 3rd.dixiedean said:
Except Ten Hag miraculously, at the very last moment, kept them in Europe.FrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it0 -
Peter, I'm pretty certain that Louise Mensch did not post under her own name but as com*******r.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.0 -
Maybe LAB will have it in the manifesto. But they probably won't!rottenborough said:
Actually I don't think they could.Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
The sovereign will not be happy about such a massive constitutional change without a manifesto commitment and nor would the Lords.0 -
Not only did he freeze yesterday, he mixed up Iraq and Ukraine. It is literally every single day.Leon said:Biden is now essentially incoherent. Someone needs to intervene. This is NOW - how can he possibly be president for 4 more years??
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1800628158317867337?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw2 -
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.2 -
I don't really buy the Lib Dem Ed Davey gurn surge. It feels a bit confected, as the Cleggasm did.0
-
2nd term.londonpubman said:
Maybe LAB will have it in the manifesto. But they probably won't!rottenborough said:
Actually I don't think they could.Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
The sovereign will not be happy about such a massive constitutional change without a manifesto commitment and nor would the Lords.0 -
I would be interested in the results of a poll that asked whether voters would be willing to pay an additional £2,017 in tax, in return for better services.Mexicanpete said:
I wonder what Sunak will say? Perhaps "I have a plan, my plan is working, Starmer has no plan, except increasing taxes for every working person by £2017 every day".Big_G_NorthWales said:
I do not know, but I do know it is Sunak v Starmer live on Sky tomorrow evening with Sky drawing Starmer to go first meaning Sunak will have the last sayBig_Ian said:
When do we get to see this interview?eek said:
If this was the campaign they ran in the Autumn they would be starting from a worse position. The only upside is that Rishi wouldn't have left DD to do an rumoured to be utter appalling ITV interview.Richard_Tyndall said:
To be honest right now the Tory campaign looks worse than Foot's.rottenborough said:
Dan Hodges tweeted almost daily for months that waiting any longer would make Tory defeat worse but i suspect he hadn't factored in them running the worst campaign since Michael Foot.kle4 said:
Things are getting worse, not better. Hard to see where good news will come from to turn things round so they can recover to disastrous up from extinction.Sunil_Prasannan said:Evening all! Sunak polling well below Liz Truss:
0 -
Posting under your own name is crazy. Post under a pseudonym like I do. Nobody has a clue what my name is...JohnO said:
Peter, I'm pretty certain that Louis Mensch did not post under her own name but as com*******r.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.9 -
Fair point. I hope Labour go for it.dixiedean said:
Was just done with the PPC and Mayoral voting system.Benpointer said:
I agree but a constitutional change by the HoC overriding a referendum vote? Are you ok with that principle?Andy_JS said:
If Labour win a big majority they should just bring in proportional representation via a simple vote in the Commons. Don't bother with a referendum. That's how the system works in this country, MPs are elected to make these decisions.Benpointer said:
That's probably enough to hole FPTP below the waterline.Andy_JS said:
Not just a majority, but a 300 seat majority according to Electoral Calculus. 475 seats to 175 for all other parties.SandyRentool said:Just to say, no party securing 38% of the vote should have a majority, let alone a landslide.
FPTP is a load of undemocratic shite.
Against which: 1. No incentive for the incoming government to change the system, 2. The 2011 AV referendum vote.
Same approach could be applied to Re-join.
It isn't a Constitutional change. It's a voting system change.
Not the same thing. At all.
In the event the Tories are down in 3rd place on seats despite coming 2nd in the vote will they embrace PR?0 -
Me sir, me sir, is that what that weird cash stuff is before it is printed onto?dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.1 -
The original Jack_W's identity is also a very poorly kept secret.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.0 -
I have unfortunately only spent one long weekend in Romania (Cluj, Wizz had just started direct flights and they were bugger cheap) and not been to Bulgaria. Ukraine is nice, Lviv is a mini Kraków and the battlefield of Poltava is worth a visit. Ate dried fish (taranka) in a bar in Kyiv. Did my first trip to SEA this winter (Thai and Cambodia) and hope to go back for my first retired winter starting with Nam north to southLeon said:
Rural moldova, rural Bulgaria, inland Montenegro, rural Romania, mainland Greece is particularly stunning. And cheap. And sunnyJohnLilburne said:
Albania is cheap and the locals are friendly (they appear to have exported their criminals). Kosovo also nice, but no beaches. Poland and the Baltics are getting more expensive.Leon said:
Not true. You can do Eastern Europe and it’s cheap away from the Med. And often lovelycarnforth said:
If you've never travelled for more than a couple of weeks, bugger off now for a couple of months and see if it palls. £1500 all in per month doable short haul if you pick the right places - airbnb places often have low monthly rates, so it pays not to move too often. Of course you have picked the wrong time of year, price-wise, for the wanderlust.kyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.
And go to Ukraine if you want magnificent cities and a unique experience (and the odd drone and air raid siren). Lviv and Odessa are world class. Kyiv is fascinating for a few days. Smaller towns like chernivtsi are beguiling, too
That’s life sorted til October when the weather turns. Then you move on to Asia0 -
Don't tell 'em, Pike !RochdalePioneers said:Posting under your own name is crazy. Post under a pseudonym like I do. Nobody has a clue what my name is...
1 -
It’s somewhat gentler and more muted than that. A few polls showing them flat or up a percent or two, a couple showing them down, and one with a big rise. Looks like an outlier. Not the stuff of Cleggmania.Luckyguy1983 said:I don't really buy the Lib Dem Ed Davey gurn surge. It feels a bit confected, as the Cleggasm did.
Headline VI isn’t going to be that important for the Lib Dems anyway, keeping a reasonable share but with better voting efficiency is the key.1 -
Looks like that's the tactic now until polling. Don't give Labour a landslide etc etc. We need a decent Opposition.Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
I believe it was tried by an Australian party in recent years.0 -
Does anyone under 40 by the Mail?dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.2 -
The Telegraph are running with it on their front page. In juxtaposition to their coverage of Rishi’s present and supporting wife.Nigelb said:.
Not Allegra Austin ?rcs1000 said:
I believe the story is about children, kittens, half a jar of peanut butter and a 1972 Austin Allegra.Mexicanpete said:
I have no idea what the story might be.Some hints without allegations might be helpful.Dumbosaurus said:FrancisUrquhart said:
Staines keep teasing an October Surprise event.Stuartinromford said:
Twenty three days left, though fewer for postal voters. And soon, the football will take over the national attention, except for viewers in Wales.BartholomewRoberts said:
Not really.Tweedledee said:NOM is *lengthening* like crazy. Science is powerless to explain this.
With the polls as they are, every day that passes should see NOM lengthen until its in the hundreds or a thousand.
There's less and less time available for "events" to prevent a Labour majority from happening, and even a polling error would just be changing the size of the majority as it stands not the fact of one.
What's left in the dairy that might allow a black swan to land?
Labour's manifesto launch.
The BBC head to head debate.
Anything else?
If its true, who knows, if it will make any difference, again who knows. Has he had a really killer story that changed political narrative in recent years, I don't think he has.
I am not sure the Tory leaning media heart is even in it. There are plenty of awkward comments that Labour figures, including Starmer, have made in the past. In previous election, they would be running them left, right and centre, instead they are minor stories tucked away on the websites. While the Speccy seems very keen to boot Sunak up the arse.
It's pretty obvious what the story is. If the tories are stupid enough to use it then it'll backfire within a couple of days. All the mysterious prominent senior Labour figure with legal training has to say is that his private life remains private. And meanwhile a mysterious junior Labour figure will leak far more damaging nepotism allegations about equally senior (in the near past) Tory figures and the electorate will be reminded what this election is about.
After Johnson's behaviour it is not easy to see any scandal having too much traction unless it involves children or kittens.0 -
I tried to pay a cheque in a Bank recently. They were bemused and befuddled. One of them had to phone a friend.dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.1 -
You may be right, John, but I can't think how I would have known the name if she didn't volunteer it. Nobody passed it on to me, as they did with Snowflake.JohnO said:
Peter, I'm pretty certain that Louis Mensch did not post under her own name but as com*******r.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
Anyway, it was a very long time ago and she stopped posting soon after leaving the House.
How's you? Keeping the Peril at bay down there in the wilds of Hersham?0 -
Of course it was. He was waiting for Dross to give a dodgy penalty in favour of Rangers.Leon said:
You really believe it was used to “watch the footy”?FrancisUrquhart said:Its funny how some people can survive story about an affair, but running up a big bill on your iPad to watch the footy or your husband watching an adult movie, absolutely to the lions.
0 -
Some of us are so ancient we can even remember TSE posting under his real name. Or, at least, under a plausible forename-surname combination that was definitely not The Screaming Eagles.JohnO said:
Peter, I'm pretty certain that Louise Mensch did not post under her own name but as com*******r.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.0 -
My dad's business still uses cheques to pay other businesses, although the number of such transactions has gone down recently.dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.0 -
The equation is that someone else pays extra tax and we get better services.Fairliered said:
I would be interested in the results of a poll that asked whether voters would be willing to pay an additional £2,017 in tax, in return for better services.Mexicanpete said:
I wonder what Sunak will say? Perhaps "I have a plan, my plan is working, Starmer has no plan, except increasing taxes for every working person by £2017 every day".Big_G_NorthWales said:
I do not know, but I do know it is Sunak v Starmer live on Sky tomorrow evening with Sky drawing Starmer to go first meaning Sunak will have the last sayBig_Ian said:
When do we get to see this interview?eek said:
If this was the campaign they ran in the Autumn they would be starting from a worse position. The only upside is that Rishi wouldn't have left DD to do an rumoured to be utter appalling ITV interview.Richard_Tyndall said:
To be honest right now the Tory campaign looks worse than Foot's.rottenborough said:
Dan Hodges tweeted almost daily for months that waiting any longer would make Tory defeat worse but i suspect he hadn't factored in them running the worst campaign since Michael Foot.kle4 said:
Things are getting worse, not better. Hard to see where good news will come from to turn things round so they can recover to disastrous up from extinction.Sunil_Prasannan said:Evening all! Sunak polling well below Liz Truss:
Hence why Labour will I expect make more of the difference in where the manifestos fall. Tories give tax cuts for the richest and batter the poor (that does seem to be the case with todays manifesto), Labour will soak the oil barons/hedge funds/non doms etc. In fact they could subtly hint that they will raise taxes on Tories but non Tory voters will be fine. Some might believe it.0 -
Must've been a big one. Most cheques can be paid in on a mobile banking app.Scott_xP said:
I tried to pay a cheque in a Bank recently. They were bemused and befuddled. One of them had to phone a friend.dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.0 -
Comedy novelty one ;-)Benpointer said:
Must've been a big one. Most cheques can be paid in on a mobile banking app.Scott_xP said:
I tried to pay a cheque in a Bank recently. They were bemused and befuddled. One of them had to phone a friend.dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.0 -
Is it?rcs1000 said:
The original Jack_W's identity is also a very poorly kept secret.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
Not one I'm party to.1 -
Anyway what does if matter if they're given a blank cheque ?Benpointer said:
Does anyone under 40 by the Mail?dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.
It would only bounce if they wrote a big number on it.0 -
Yep. He’s declining daily. Trump is not far behind but gets away with it - to an extent - because he’s always rambledFrancisUrquhart said:
Not only did he freeze yesterday, he mixed up Iraq and Ukraine. It is literally every single day.Leon said:Biden is now essentially incoherent. Someone needs to intervene. This is NOW - how can he possibly be president for 4 more years??
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1800628158317867337?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw
But this is fucking insane. The most important job in the world and the only real candidates are two dribbling old fools. The western world is at a moment of maximum peril and America has a choice between senile hypocrisy and demented villainy. Enough!!!!!2 -
Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
1 -
Good point. My bank gave me a book of blank cheques.Nigelb said:
Anyway what does if matter if they're given a blank cheque ?Benpointer said:
Does anyone under 40 by the Mail?dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.
It would only bounce if they wrote a big number on it.0 -
Well, I'm not going to dox him. It would be impolite.dixiedean said:
Is it?rcs1000 said:
The original Jack_W's identity is also a very poorly kept secret.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
Not one I'm party to.0 -
Guru-Murthy has been reading this blog!!Nigelb said:Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
I posted exactly this point on free state pension hours ago.
3 -
KGM is talking as much bollock as MS. Class 4 NI is only one part of it. Earn £50k and you still paying NI and remember thresholds are being frozen for several years.Nigelb said:Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
Not many people are running their own businesses for anything length of time for the luxury of earning < £50k a year (gig workers aside). Long term you won't make it work if you earn such a small amount as no wiggle room for any fluctuation in earnings.1 -
Quite right too. But he's obviously been doxxed before.rcs1000 said:
Well, I'm not going to dox him. It would be impolite.dixiedean said:
Is it?rcs1000 said:
The original Jack_W's identity is also a very poorly kept secret.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
Not one I'm party to.0 -
Of course, she was Louise Bagshawe for much of the time. Perhaps, she was outed privately at one those notorious dissolute pb boozy gatherings?Peter_the_Punter said:
You may be right, John, but I can't think how I would have known the name if she didn't volunteer it. Nobody passed it on to me, as they did with Snowflake.JohnO said:
Peter, I'm pretty certain that Louis Mensch did not post under her own name but as com*******r.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.
Anyway, it was a very long time ago and she stopped posting soon after leaving the House.
How's you? Keeping the Peril at bay down there in the wilds of Hersham?
Sadly, they have already stormed the gates...I am but the last remaing but heroically redoubtable survivor.3 -
They are crossed cheques.Benpointer said:
Good point. My bank gave me a book of blank cheques.Nigelb said:
Anyway what does if matter if they're given a blank cheque ?Benpointer said:
Does anyone under 40 by the Mail?dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.
It would only bounce if they wrote a big number on it.0 -
SE Asia from November-March is the best place in the world. Stupendous food, fascinating cultures, great weather. Mighty cities as well - glittering and safeJohnLilburne said:
I have unfortunately only spent one long weekend in Romania (Cluj, Wizz had just started direct flights and they were bugger cheap) and not been to Bulgaria. Ukraine is nice, Lviv is a mini Kraków and the battlefield of Poltava is worth a visit. Ate dried fish (taranka) in a bar in Kyiv. Did my first trip to SEA this winter (Thai and Cambodia) and hope to go back for my first retired winter starting with Nam north to southLeon said:
Rural moldova, rural Bulgaria, inland Montenegro, rural Romania, mainland Greece is particularly stunning. And cheap. And sunnyJohnLilburne said:
Albania is cheap and the locals are friendly (they appear to have exported their criminals). Kosovo also nice, but no beaches. Poland and the Baltics are getting more expensive.Leon said:
Not true. You can do Eastern Europe and it’s cheap away from the Med. And often lovelycarnforth said:
If you've never travelled for more than a couple of weeks, bugger off now for a couple of months and see if it palls. £1500 all in per month doable short haul if you pick the right places - airbnb places often have low monthly rates, so it pays not to move too often. Of course you have picked the wrong time of year, price-wise, for the wanderlust.kyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.
And go to Ukraine if you want magnificent cities and a unique experience (and the odd drone and air raid siren). Lviv and Odessa are world class. Kyiv is fascinating for a few days. Smaller towns like chernivtsi are beguiling, too
That’s life sorted til October when the weather turns. Then you move on to Asia
Phnom Penh is my new favourite city. The restaurants of bassac lane!!
Laos is lovely. Vietnam is dynamic1 -
How would self-employed people qualify years for the State Pension?FrancisUrquhart said:
KGM is talking as much bollock as MS. Class 4 NI is only one part of it. Earn £50k and you still paying NI and remember thresholds are being frozen for several years.Nigelb said:Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
Not many people are running their own businesses for anything length of time for the luxury of earning < £50k a year (gig workers aside).0 -
Nobody with your fertile imagination should need internet porn to finish a successful wank in two minutes.Leon said:
Here’s a true story, as we are past the lagershedFrancisUrquhart said:
Absolutely, or it was his kids watching YouTube, or something...I couldn't keep up with the every changing excuse.Leon said:
You really believe it was used to “watch the footy”?FrancisUrquhart said:Its funny how some people can survive story about an affair, but running up a big bill on your iPad to watch the footy or your husband watching an adult movie, absolutely to the lions.
I was once in a Luxor hotel researching some ancient flints and I got bored and lonely in my hotel room. I had an iPad with me - probably iPad 1 it was so early - and I realised I had a wavering bit of signal. Just enough to watch porn. Proto 3G?
But massively expensive. £29 for 3MB etc
I warned myself - right, 2 minutes, Kleenex, finished
About five hours later I energetically culminated and looked in horror at my data usage. Gigabytes on gigabytes. I realised I’d probably spent £5k or £10k on a single wank
And this was before the days of my affluence
No way I could pay a £10k phone bill so the next day I concocted a plan. I decided to go to the police and report that my iPad had been stolen. So I’d have a get-out when Vodafone came asking for their £10,000
I went into the Luxor police station and reported my iPad was stolen but as soon as I began making my report I realised this didn’t make sense - how and where was it stolen? Just that? In my hotel room? - and if they got suspicious they might find I still had my iPad…. so I changed my story to “I loaned my iPad to a dubious person and I think they might have misused it while I was asleep” and at this point the Egyptian policeman was essentially laughing in my face and asking his colleagues to come and listen to the most insane load of bullshit ever heard in the Upper Nile so I pretended I felt suddenly unwell and fled back to my hotel with this bankrupting wank-bill looming
When I got back to England my monthly Vodafone bill arrived. £32. For some reason my MASSIVE DATA USAGE never registered0 -
I couldn’t disagree with you more.Big_G_NorthWales said:
No other obvious candidate, so yesFrancisUrquhart said:
Its like the Tories sticking with Sunak....Big_G_NorthWales said:Eric Ten Hag to stay as Manchester United Manager
Probably the right decision but why take so long to confirm it
Rúben Amorim.
Liverpool embarrassed themselves choosing Slot ahead of Amorim. For Man Utd to stick, rather than twist with Amorim is more dumber still.
Amorim and his system is perfect match for a mega club and the quality of players they can provide him.0 -
History's most famous blank cheque is the one handed to the Austro-Hungarian empire by the Kaiser after Sarajevo.Andy_JS said:
My dad's business still uses cheques to pay other businesses, although the number of such transactions has gone down recently.dixiedean said:
Does anyone under 40 know what a cheque is?Stuartinromford said:Meanwhile, the Mail are probably more realistic in their takeaway from the manifesto launch:
RISHI: DON'T GIVE LABOUR A BLANK CHEQUE
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Let alone a blank one.
The Austrians lost everything in the end.0 -
I'm watching the Scottish Leaders debate on catchup. Wowsers. John Swinney is an unhappy chappy. Keeps being called out for all of the austerity and cuts his government have imposed. And the defence? "Westminster". He's a bit prickly!0
-
Just in the middle of the Beeb's D-Day Unheard Tapes it's fantastic, terrifying and really effective.
I've done two out of three so no spoilers please.2 -
Had no idea carte blanche was the literal blank cheque.
Of course it is when you Google...0 -
Same way as for example people in higher education get years credited.Benpointer said:
How would self-employed people qualify years for the State Pension?FrancisUrquhart said:
KGM is talking as much bollock as MS. Class 4 NI is only one part of it. Earn £50k and you still paying NI and remember thresholds are being frozen for several years.Nigelb said:Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
Not many people are running their own businesses for anything length of time for the luxury of earning < £50k a year (gig workers aside).
My point is that KGM is trying to make it sound like all these people will get free state pension, the proportion of people running their own businesses for any length of time on less than that will be very small. Other than gig work, nobody runs a one man band business for £30-40k a year, you are better off getting a normal job and something will come along and bust you.
Now is it a stupid policy overall, yes.0 -
We could have had that if we hadn’t had 14 years of a grifter friendly Tory government.Leon said:
British weather is now unacceptablekyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.
You can seriously have a blast wandering the world. I am. Take Ukraine. Ok there’s a war on but if you’re careful it’s not THAT dangerous - it is also a lot more interesting than sitting at home in a bed sit in Balham. Or Bootle
Everything is insanely cheap. I just had a really good Italian meal - two large aperol spritz, inventive bruschetta, seafood fettuccine, glass of good white, at a restaurant in the most fashionable bit of Odessa - beautiful Odessa - £15
If you want good borscht and beer you can eat really well for £5. A bus from Kyiv to Odessa - £13
And thanks to our digital world you can stay in touch with everyone. I had a long WhatsApp chat with my brother in Peru then a group chat with friends and now I’m hanging out on PB
You no longer need to be anywhere in particular. If you can work from home you can work on the road where food is cheap, the sun shines, you see endlessly interesting things, and tax is zero0 -
Rishi is obviously going for the pound in your pocket. It's tax, tax, tax. Not historically an overly stupid strategy.0
-
Sunak leaves just about now.TOPPING said:Just in the middle of the Beeb's D-Day Unheard Tapes it's fantastic, terrifying and really effective.
I've done two out of three so no spoilers please.0 -
LORD ASHCROFT:
Lab 43 (-4)
Con 21 (-2)
Ref 15 (+4)
LD 7 (+1)
Grn 7 (+1)
https://x.com/LordAshcroft/status/18006386701287875711 -
Except the tax burden under the Tories has gone up and is still going up.TOPPING said:Rishi is obviously going for the pound in your pocket. It's tax, tax, tax. Not historically an overly stupid strategy.
Pissing on voters while telling them it is raining is an overly stupid strategy0 -
Original? So who is the sporadic contributor now, a young pretender?rcs1000 said:
The original Jack_W's identity is also a very poorly kept secret.Peter_the_Punter said:
She was a very active poster here for some time. She was then and still is an MP but she never identified herself here by her real name so her anonymity should be respected.Benpointer said:
Who's Snowflake?dixiedean said:
Be really good to keep a PB representative in HofC streak going after the demise of tissueprice and Stewart Jackson.Cookie said:
I don't think, realistically, the 66-1 on @RochdalePioneers is particularly exciting value. Nevertheless, I've wagered £1.50 on him so I can join in the fun on election night. Come on Rochdale!Mexicanpete said:
If Tory seats tumble as projected we are going to need a bigger HoL.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Good eveningPeter_the_Punter said:
Matt/RochdaleMattW said:
Wishing you success. From the Rational Refuge which is AshfieldRochdalePioneers said:
Oh believe me, I’m genuinely considering that I could win. Probably won’t. But in a crazy election there will be some crazy results. And my seat is crazy central in Scotland…PedestrianRock said:@RochdalePioneers 66/1 shot is making me think that in an election with weird 3 and 4 way battles in some seats, there might be value in betting on a bunch of reasonable long shots and hoping for maximum chaos... FPTP's idiosyncrasies could see you win some.
EDIT - we do have councillors here if that adds any context. We’re not coming from nowhere. Councillors in Central Buchan and Fraserburgh and Peterhead and briefly in Buckie (he resigned quickly) and I finished 3rd in a 3 seat ward (Troup - Macduff mainly) before losing in round 5 of voting having picked up transfer votes from everyone else including the Tories….
It is my belief that this is a really crazy election and we may well see some really crazy results. Long experience as a punter has taught me that in crazy situations, backing the long-shots usually pays dividends.
Rochdale, you could win. In my constituency of Tewkesbury, the LDs can certainly win. I would very much like to hear from others who from close association with events in their locality can recommend a decent punt at long odds. Trouble is, how to track them?
Would somebody like to keep a record of such long-shots and who recommended them, so that those of us who drift in and out can readily find them and bet accordingly if we wish?
I'd offer myself, but I disappear for long spells, am not tecky, and am bone idle.
I think it is more likely that the SNP will win in @RochdalePioneers seat, but certainly Ross's behaviour has opened the door to an unexpected result
Expect to see Ross in the HOL if he loses, joining Ruth Davidson
Snowflake will be back.
Ex MP Louise Mensch always posted under her real name, as does Nick Palmer of course.
Aaron Bell originally posted under his own name, but changed it to Tissue Price when he stood for Parliament. This is perfectly understandable, but was hardly a secret. I'm hoping we'll see a lot more of him now that he has left the House. Apart from anything else he gave some cracking tips.
Mike Smithson once told me that a lot of MPs follow this site, and some post occasionally under pseudonyms. i can believe this easily, but Mike has always been the soul of discretion, and to the best of my knowledge none were ever outed.1 -
Maybe so but it will sow some doubt in people's minds.Scott_xP said:
Except the tax burden under the Tories has gone up and is still going up.TOPPING said:Rishi is obviously going for the pound in your pocket. It's tax, tax, tax. Not historically an overly stupid strategy.
Pissing on voters while telling them it is raining is an overly stupid strategy0 -
I yield to no one in my contempt for these wet lefty Tories but how are they responsible for a globalised, digitised world allowing freelancers to work anywhere, and how are they responsible fir giving london the climate of Anchorage?Fairliered said:
We could have had that if we hadn’t had 14 years of a grifter friendly Tory government.Leon said:
British weather is now unacceptablekyf_100 said:
I've spent a lot of time today looking at digital nomad visas and wondering if it's possible to keep on touring the world on a shoestring budget.Leon said:
I’ve told you. London is now Anchorage. It’s why I’ve emigratedwilliamglenn said:Do we now have two winters per year? If Sunak was hoping for some feel-good weather, the elements are not on his side.
Has to be better than waiting around in a chilly flat in London for the three or so days a month of freelance work to dribble in.
I actually have my electric blanket out tonight. In June.
You can seriously have a blast wandering the world. I am. Take Ukraine. Ok there’s a war on but if you’re careful it’s not THAT dangerous - it is also a lot more interesting than sitting at home in a bed sit in Balham. Or Bootle
Everything is insanely cheap. I just had a really good Italian meal - two large aperol spritz, inventive bruschetta, seafood fettuccine, glass of good white, at a restaurant in the most fashionable bit of Odessa - beautiful Odessa - £15
If you want good borscht and beer you can eat really well for £5. A bus from Kyiv to Odessa - £13
And thanks to our digital world you can stay in touch with everyone. I had a long WhatsApp chat with my brother in Peru then a group chat with friends and now I’m hanging out on PB
You no longer need to be anywhere in particular. If you can work from home you can work on the road where food is cheap, the sun shines, you see endlessly interesting things, and tax is zero0 -
Same types of movements we've seen elsewhere.MikeL said:LORD ASHCROFT:
Lab 43 (-4)
Con 21 (-2)
Ref 15 (+4)
LD 7 (+1)
Grn 7 (+1)
https://x.com/LordAshcroft/status/18006386701287875710 -
Presumably to create a premium. If the low paid care worker issue were to be addressed by raising the minimum wage, then it would do nothing to help. Wages for supermarket shelf stackers and other roles that most people would find easier than, and preferable to, wiping bottoms would rise just as much, and keep dragging potential workers away.dixiedean said:
Why just care workers?rottenborough said:
Neil Henderson
@hendopolis
·
7m
I: Labour promises £12 an hour to care workers #TomorrowsPapersToday0 -
Evidence beginning to tentatively build that the Labour vote is falling. As was widely anticipated.MikeL said:LORD ASHCROFT:
Lab 43 (-4)
Con 21 (-2)
Ref 15 (+4)
LD 7 (+1)
Grn 7 (+1)
https://x.com/LordAshcroft/status/1800638670128787571
But, that the Tory share is also on the slide.
Not expected.
It's very much MOE. But when MOE is all in the same direction, it begins, after a decent interval, to constitute a pattern.1 -
The previous poll had LD on 6?Andy_JS said:
Same types of movements we've seen elsewhere.MikeL said:LORD ASHCROFT:
Lab 43 (-4)
Con 21 (-2)
Ref 15 (+4)
LD 7 (+1)
Grn 7 (+1)
https://x.com/LordAshcroft/status/1800638670128787571
For Labour to lose the froth from 47 to 43 isn’t so bad. But for Tories to be under 25, each point backwards should be eating into their heartlands, each point worse than Labours froth drop. It is all very curious and unbelievable. Unless seen through a prism where Conservatives see Farage as the best Conservative in the field.0 -
Just shows how out of touch you are: 95% of self-employed were earning <£50k in 2021-22:FrancisUrquhart said:
KGM is talking as much bollock as MS. Class 4 NI is only one part of it. Earn £50k and you still paying NI and remember thresholds are being frozen for several years.Nigelb said:Wut ?
Krishnan Guru-Murthy crucifies Mel Stride on abolishing National Insurance for self employed and on pension
KGM, "You're getting rid of class 4 National Insurance contributions for the self employed"
MS, "Yes"
KGM, "So how do self employed qualify for a state pension?"
MS, "You can still have a system where you have nil rate National Insurance and have that as a contribution to state pension"
KGM, "So self employed people will just get a state pension for free now?"
MS, "Well, they will make their contribution to the economy in the normal way"
https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1800623762657640905
Not many people are running their own businesses for anything length of time for the luxury of earning < £50k a year (gig workers aside). Long term you won't make it work if you earn such a small amount as no wiggle room for any fluctuation in earnings.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/income-of-individuals-with-self-employment-sources-2010-to-2011#full-publication-update-history1 -
The question is whether the Labour vote is mostly falling in their safe seats, or is it dropping everywhere?dixiedean said:
Evidence beginning to tentatively build that the Labour vote is falling. As was widely anticipated.MikeL said:LORD ASHCROFT:
Lab 43 (-4)
Con 21 (-2)
Ref 15 (+4)
LD 7 (+1)
Grn 7 (+1)
https://x.com/LordAshcroft/status/1800638670128787571
But, that the Tory share is also on the slide.
Not expected.0