Options
Some worrying statistics from America – politicalbetting.com
Some worrying statistics from America – politicalbetting.com
Vaccine latest via new Fox News poll:Biden voters:86% already vaccinated3% don't plan to get vaccinatedTrump voters:54% already vaccinated32% don't plan to get vaccinated
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
https://careers.reeftechnology.com/jobs/box-chef-greater-london-england-united-kingdom
Vaccines work. They are the cure and life can go back to normal.
Couple of short shopping trips yesterday; few older people, including me, wearing masks actually in shops, but outside much less likely.
Pretty sure all my family who can be vaccinated...... ie those over 18 .... have been.
From a macabre but relevant political betting point of view, if we assume US covid deaths average 500 per day and break 3:1 Republican, it is a change of 365k voters over a 4 year cycle. The last two elections could have been swung by 80k and 40k votes (note this is misleading as it obviously depends which state the voters are in).
The bigger political switch is probably whether the family and friends of those who die or suffer life changing consequences, who will also currently skew Republican, will blame Republicans or Democrats by 2024?
They are correct in their analysis: this government lacks the fortitude to do any on water operation that would make any difference.
However, what they are missing is that this cannot be fixed by a tory government. This is a Europe wide problem that needs a European solution. However the tories have spent the last five years gleefully shitting on European cooperation in general and the French and particular. They withdrew from the Dublin Convention which would have allowed the legal return of some of the arrivals to other European countries.
It's going to take a government of a different political complexion that can upgrade the UK's relationship with the EU to fix it.
This time last year we had a low and fairly stable infection rate with few legal restrictions. Normality seemed only just around the corner. Now the virus is much more transmissible and the infection rate is a lot higher than it was then, but the effects of vaccination are just about holding it in check.
What changed before was essentially just the time of year. By November - at a time when the Alpha variant was geographically still very localised - we were back in lockdown, despite the virus having all but disappeared in the Summer.
We can only hope Delta doesn't show the same seasonal variation. If it does, the people who are saying we don't need to worry about the infection rate because "vaccines work" need to bear in mind that the pressure point is hospital admissions rather than deaths, and that according to REACT the current hospitalisation rate per infection is about as high as it ever was.
It's only under Johnson and his acolytes that the party has become rabid English Nationalists.
It's true that in the meantime the US is giving the virus more chances to mutate in the US than it otherwise would, but the world as a whole is currently bottle-necked by vaccine supply not demand, so most of the vaccines that aren't being bought by Americans are being bought by someone else, generally a medium-income country with more people in greater need. So if Republicans want to take their time and die at slightly higher rates, I don't think that's a big problem for everybody else.
2. The current hospitalization rate is not as high as it ever was. I mean, if you’d said “adjusted for age…”, you might have been accurate. But as a blanket statement, it is just plain wrong.
1. the Conservative Party abandoning English Nationalism and becoming pro-Europe again, or
2. a government of a different political complexion taking power
Because one of those two things has to happen to solve the informal transmanche regatta.
Path 2 seems far more likely than path 1.
Is there a missing word there?
Suppose the Conservatives lose in 2024. Is the next LotO more likely to be a "Brexit with a human face" type (Hunt, say) or a "Boris's problem was he was just too soft on Europe, bless him" character (Patel or JRM, for example)?
https://twitter.com/margarance/status/1426623297932906501
Deeply disappointing to hear – on top of everything – that Afghans who received Scholarships from the UK government to study in the UK this year have now been told they will not be granted visas due to "administration issues". Surely someone can sort this out?
https://twitter.com/RoryStewartUK/status/1426558342709891078
Is JRM the new IDS and Patel the new Howard?
Who’s the Hague?
I'm surprised that this can't be resolved with insurance companies making it mandatory for coverage. There would be s bit of moaning but it would get loads of those 16% of Biden voters and 46% of Trump voters over the line.
‘An absolute disgrace I hope @LUFC bans these people as they are no supporters of the club’
https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1426542380610641922?s=21
But hardly surprising given the shambles that are the DfE and the Home Office.
Instead of helping to prevent this pandemic, the WHO are one of the major causes of it by helping China to cover it up initially and spread it all over the world.
It is a body that is not fit for purpose and needs to be swept away by replaced by one that is. Withdrawal of funding is the only way to do that.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/china-the-who-and-the-power-grab-that-fuelled-a-pandemic-3mt05m06n
Well worth a read and it touches on the lab leak theory towards the end. IMO, the lab leak should now be considered as having happened and China will need to provide extremely compelling evidence to the contrary to change that notion.
But I suspect - although the person who said it should still be sacked - that the real reason is they don’t want to admit they’re actually incapable of processing the paperwork.
Here’s one example that shows just how chaotic they are:
https://www.gloscricket.co.uk/news/statement-on-graeme-van-buuren/
Four months on, he’s still waiting.
Now if they cannot sort one piece of paper in a timely fashion for somebody who has lived in the UK for years, is married to a British subject, is employed by a British organisation in a well paid role, and applied well in advance of the deadline, what chance have they got of sorting the paperwork for thousands of penniless Afghan refugees?
And of course they don’t care about promises or integrity or anything else.
So they first renege on the promises and then lie.
There’s a plausible scenario.
And those Afghans who tried to help us are the ones who lose out.
You've got to admire the insanity. Woke governments (of which the US and to a lesser extent the UK are included) are in a performative panic about racism and womens rights; whilst they actively abandon a whole generation of young women to a life of rape and slavery, if they survive at all; in an actual patriarchial hell.
The Home Office may be the one exception to that.
After that I admit I start to struggle.
There is no chance of any kind of deal with the EU which is going to have a material impact on the number of asylum seekers coming here. We didn't have one when we were fully signed up members of the EU and we don't have one now. I suspect that most of them think we have a much less significant problem than those countries facing the Med or in the Balkans have.
We now have a disaster in Afghanistan which is going to generate hundreds of thousands of more refugees, many of whom will have English as a second language and some of whom will already have relatives here. There are no solutions to this problem I'm afraid. The government talks tough because that's what their supporters want to hear but the reality is that unless we start opening fire on those in the Channel nothing is going to stop large scale immigration here.
This isn't rocket science. If we support those who assisted us we encourage others in the future to do likewise. If we abandon them in defiance of promises made to the contrary, we do the opposite.
Even disregarding morality, it's plain stupid.
Firstly the afghans who are here can no longer be deported as Afghanistan is no longer safe. Secondly, you are looking at millions more potential refugees because of the Taliban takeover. Thirdly, how can they be turned away?
Its more than a problem of slow paperwork.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/567907-trump-slams-biden-for-not-following-the-plan-he-left-on
Hate to quibble, but I’m not entirely comfortable with your word “Scotaphobe” there. It just looks wrong.
Obviously anti-Scottish sentiment does exist, and therefore needs a word or term, but consensus seems to be lacking.
Wikipedia (oh oh) suggests “Scotophobe” or “Albaphobe”, but the first is also fear of darkness and the second might suggest hatred of a new political party, Sainsbury’s electronic products or a BBC television channel.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Scottish_sentiment
“Scotaphobe” does google, but it seems to be largely social media. Given that the phenomenon has existed since the Middle Ages, you’d have thought that a word would have established itself.
There is no reason that we couldn't give out asylum visas in Kabul if we wanted, a Wallenberg type programme. That would be a much improved asylum programme over the current deportation policy.
Presumably those on these scholarships are vetted, indeed seen as a vanguard for our values.
The reality is not quite so clear cut.
Best prices - Unite General Secretary election
Steve Turner 10/11
Gerard Coyne 2/1
Sharon Graham 11/4
So even if that’s the correct explanation, we’re still looking at total incompetence.
Have i missed the law being made that fans cannot say anything negative about opposition players? Has Rashford got his own blasphemy lay now? Its the Mp that wants sacking
Edited extra bit: may've been Chris someone-or-other.
So, let us park the morality of the situation for a moment and focus on the practicalities. It would not be terribly difficult for the Government to negotiate an agreement with a friendly state like Sierra Leone (Commonwealth, dirt poor, saved from limb chopping psychopaths by that nice Mr Blair, would probably rather like a fat fee of $250m per annum) to build a giant internment camp. You then legislate to automatically disqualify the boat people from claiming asylum, amend the HRA to prevent the activist lawyers from using it to prevent them from being deported, dump them there and forget about them. In crude terms, it would make Labour's voters howl but the Tories' would be delighted.
Since neither the Government nor its supporters want the mass influx of irregular undocumented migrants on inflatable rafts to continue, then the most logical explanation for not taking actions that are entirely within its power to stop them is that it is too nice. It won't cast them into an oubliette because, unlike in the Australian case, ministers' consciences wouldn't wear it. Remarkable but quite possibly true.
https://twitter.com/otto_english/status/1417739718452785152?s=21
I’m not giving them a pass on this. They’re more useless than Johnson’s chastity belt.
But do you really think banning these people for this song is justified in any way, shape or form ?
Over a harmless chant. If they were making monkey noises or racist chanting then they should be banned. The fans caught on film fighting in Manchester yesterday, largely posted on Twitter, should be banned. A ban for This song. No way.
Famous for posing in his underpants.
The article from the Mail also features more about Hydrogen boilers which I mentioned a few times last week during the climate discussions here. What I didn’t realise was 80% of the gas network was already ready for Hydrogen when it happens.
Polls consistently show people favour action on the environment but I just wonder if they favour action that doesn’t cost them or inconvenience them.
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article-9893211/Homeowners-offered-7-000-help-replace-gas-boilers-new-400m-scrappage-scheme.html
Of course that psychological problem was somewhat exacerbated in this country by the 10% of the population who came here from Europe with no checks whatsoever.
The fellow waving the Turkish flag, whilst stood next to a steward should probably be banned
https://twitter.com/tashaaltv/status/1426547100167413762?s=21
The ONS blog discusses the discrepancy here and concludes there are about 3.5 million EU citizens living here:
https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/07/02/are-there-really-6m-eu-citizens-living-in-the-uk/amp/
I know a number of Greek, Spanish and Portuguese who applied and are now back in their home counties, who registered to keep options open, do locums etc, but have no intention of permanent settlement.
Incidentally, getting these 3.5 million to become citizens and register to vote might have an interesting effect on constituency boundaries. I imagine most are urban. Savvy political parties might well want to appeal to them.
Long Covid may make the GOP supporters of ObamaCare.
The referees a wanker being replaced with the referee practises acts of self love. As an example.