Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Lest we forget – the sheer scale of the UK COVID toll – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,126
edited February 2021 in General
imageLest we forget – the sheer scale of the UK COVID toll – politicalbetting.com

For four years, the town of Wootton Bassett bore the sad duty of receiving the repatriated war dead from Afghanistan and Iraq.  It did so with dignified compassion.  For 345 men and women, the town’s people lined the streets reverently.  They comforted the bereaved.  They remembered the soldiers’ service.  The oak of the coffins and the brass of the fittings were polished to a mirror sheen and wrapped with union flags on their final journeys.  When the town’s duty was discharged in 2011, it was granted the title Royal Wootton Bassett to show the nation’s gratitude for its quiet service.

Read the full story here

«13456789

Comments

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    A picture tells a thousand words.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    OK, so it is the only metric we need consider. To bed and arise Sir Alexander Johnson.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637
    Excellent thread.

    PB Tories whataboutery re vaccines does not absolve this Government from its disgraceful performance.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    What's Europe got to do with our disgraceful number of deaths, stop the deflection.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Excellent thread.

    PB Tories whataboutery re vaccines does not absolve this Government from its disgraceful performance.

    I'm not a tory and 'disgraceful performance' are words best reserved for the EU on vaccines. You can't absolve the British public from blame, although lefties are trying. I STILL see loads of people in shops, on public transport and indoor spaces without face masks. In some parts face mask wearing seems under 50%. Parties and meet-ups are still taking place and people are still socialising and travelling for pleasure. That is NOT Boris' fault.

    It's now all about vaccination, at which we excel.

    Meeks has written nothing meaningful about either vaccines or his beloved EU. Instead he has heaped blame for the evils of the world onto the tories. So it's typically unbalanced, borderline unhinged.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637

    A typical Alastair Meeks article. Within three words it was obvious who authored it. It's not just the tortuous flowery language. It's the constant diatribes against the Conservatives. Boris was big to take full responsibility, a much bigger person than Meeks. Because it's not just his fault. The Brits are a recalcitrant lot. We don't listen and we don't follow rules: from social distancing, to face mask wearing (STILL) and lockdown.

    Yep, the Gov't screwed up early on. Nope, we won't forget that lots died. However, it's also time to stop being moaning whinge-bags (Alastair), be thankful for the brilliance of the vaccine rollout and for the living to get on with living.

    Every Whatabouutery the vaccine the vaccine the vaccine comment like yours

    Makes Alistair points look even more right.

    Don't forget to include the word Europe in your next Whataboutery response though.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.
    Public inquiries are wildly overrated. Some has-been judge (why is it so often a judge?) with no relevant expertise is appointed, they are expensive, take ages, and the result is often either a whitewash (Hutton, Franks, etc.) or an endorsement of whatever the government has put in place anyway (many of them). But they are a useful mechanism for governments to delay accountability so I'm sure they'll continue to happen.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    Great to see cases back below 20k, things now moving quickly in the right direction, as the vaccination effort continues apace.

  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Fishing said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.
    Public inquiries are wildly overrated. .
    Indeed.

    My brother is very critical of the Gov't's handling but thinks a public inquiry would be a complete waste of time. He thinks we should now concentrate on rebuilding for the future.

    He's right.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    A typical Alastair Meeks article. Within three words it was obvious who authored it. It's not just the tortuous flowery language. It's the constant diatribes against the Conservatives. Boris was big to take full responsibility, a much bigger person than Meeks. Because it's not just his fault. The Brits are a recalcitrant lot. We don't listen and we don't follow rules: from social distancing, to face mask wearing (STILL) and lockdown.

    Yep, the Gov't screwed up early on. Nope, we won't forget that lots died. However, it's also time to stop being moaning whinge-bags (Alastair), be thankful for the brilliance of the vaccine rollout and for the living to get on with living.

    Every Whatabouutery the vaccine the vaccine the vaccine comment like yours

    Makes Alistair points look even more right.

    Don't forget to include the word Europe in your next Whataboutery response though.
    You seem to think 'whataboutery' is a one-way street, well that's not how intelligent discourse works.

    If you wish to focus solely on death, fine, do so. I think it's mistaken but if that's your only criteria then so be it. But in that case have the decency and intelligence to await the final tallies. A year from now you may well find the overall picture looks a little different.

    Besides, I'm not going to succumb to your fascist censorship. Vaccination is the route out for the majority who won't have died from this pandemic and so it's right to point to the stunning, stellar, success of the Government.

    yours, a Labour voter.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    edited February 2021

    Fishing said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.
    Public inquiries are wildly overrated. .
    Indeed.

    My brother is very critical of the Gov't's handling but thinks a public inquiry would be a complete waste of time. He thinks we should now concentrate on rebuilding for the future.

    He's right.
    The usefulness (or otherwise) of any enquiry depends entirely on the terms of reference.

    Do we want primarily to understand what happened, was was good and bad about the response, and what can be learned for the next time we are stuck by a pandemic or similar disaster - or do we want it to apportion blame, seek to scapegoat individuals and make political points?

    If it's the former, then run it along the lines of a transport accident enquiry, with full access to data and people involved being interviewed without prejudice, their words not allowed to be used against them.

    If it's the latter, which I agree is pointless, then we'll be interviewing politicians and senior civil servants with their lawyers present, unable to say anything useful for fear of implicating themselves and others.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    What's Europe got to do with our disgraceful number of deaths, stop the deflection.
    Presumably you believe it's okay to bring Europe into the equation when it suits you for comparing death tallies?

    You're like a football supporter who only looks at the number of losses and won't allow discussion of the draws, nor indeed the victories.

    Find some balance.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637

    Fishing said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.
    Public inquiries are wildly overrated. .
    Indeed.

    My brother is very critical of the Gov't's handling but thinks a public inquiry would be a complete waste of time. He thinks we should now concentrate on rebuilding for the future.

    He's right.
    Rebuild like after the WW2.

    Lest we not forget the fallen nor forgive the perpetrators.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,214
    Powerful stuff. I'm fascinated to see if Boris will manage to wriggle out of responsibility.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637
    rkrkrk said:

    Powerful stuff. I'm fascinated to see if Boris will manage to wriggle out of responsibility.

    Maybe Pritti should hold off on the return of the death penalty.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    It's bronze for Team GB in the Pandemilympics! 🏅and only 💯 thousand dead! 🥳
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637
    Dura_Ace said:

    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    It's bronze for Team GB in the Pandemilympics! 🏅and only 💯 thousand dead! 🥳
    Bronze in the vaccolympics No medals elsewhere.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,878
    Sandpit said:

    Great to see cases back below 20k, things now moving quickly in the right direction, as the vaccination effort continues apace.

    This is mostly pre-vaccination. When we get into late February, though, then the vaccination push will really have an impact on cases, transmission and (most importantly) hospitalisations.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637

    Dura_Ace said:

    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    It's bronze for Team GB in the Pandemilympics! 🏅and only 💯 thousand dead! 🥳
    Bronze in the vaccolympics No medals elsewhere.
    Other than the Gold for deflection tactics of course!
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946
    Sandpit said:

    Fishing said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.
    Public inquiries are wildly overrated. .
    Indeed.

    My brother is very critical of the Gov't's handling but thinks a public inquiry would be a complete waste of time. He thinks we should now concentrate on rebuilding for the future.

    He's right.
    The usefulness (or otherwise) of any enquiry depends entirely on the terms of reference.

    Do we want primarily to understand what happened, was was good and bad about the response, and what can be learned for the next time we are stuck by a pandemic or similar disaster - or do we want it to apportion blame, seek to scapegoat individuals and make political points?

    If it's the former, then run it along the lines of a transport accident enquiry, with full access to data and people involved being interviewed without prejudice, their words not allowed to be used against them.
    You can do that through lessons-learned exercises in individual government departments which have the advantages of being conducted by people who know what they are talking about, and being much cheaper to boot.

    I've been involved in several of these and have found them generally competently conducted and useful. The key, of course, it to make sure those who made the decisions can't influence them directly, which usually means waiting till those responsible have moved on. But those unglamorous exercises don't have a huge "we're doing something" feel about them.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,637
    rcs1000 said:

    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    Countries whose names end in a vowel do strikingly worsle than those with constanants at the end?
    Opposite applies in the worst death toll per Capita league
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946
    One factor behind the higher death toll since last autumn is of course the emergence of the B117 strain, which seems to be much more transmissible. Other comparator countries haven't yet had to grapple with that to the same extent.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    What's Europe got to do with our disgraceful number of deaths, stop the deflection.
    Presumably you believe it's okay to bring Europe into the equation when it suits you for comparing death tallies?

    You're like a football supporter who only looks at the number of losses and won't allow discussion of the draws, nor indeed the victories.

    Find some balance.
    For balance, on Mr Meeks' metrics, the UK's vaccinated would stretch end to end from North Pole to South Pole. Without "the brass fittings chinking against each other". Just a massive sigh of relief, wrapped around the planet.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,135
    FPT:

    "UK government to test mixing COVID vaccines in new trial
    The trial will combine the AstraZeneca/Oxford and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines"

    https://abcnews.go.com/Health/uk-government-test-mixing-covid-vaccines-trial/story?id=75668099
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946
    rcs1000 said:

    Sandpit said:

    A picture tells a thousand words.

    Countries whose names end in a vowel do strikingly worse than those with constanants at the end?
    I thought we were all supposed to choose female leaders to fight pandemics effectively? Or was that last year's crank theory?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344
    Incidentally, very early in Wooton Bassett's dignified displays of respect for the dead, I suggested - on here - it be given the recognition of Royal in its name. I Googled at the time, but could find no other prior reference. So possibly somebody read that suggestion here and picked up on the idea....
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    rcs1000 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Great to see cases back below 20k, things now moving quickly in the right direction, as the vaccination effort continues apace.

    This is mostly pre-vaccination. When we get into late February, though, then the vaccination push will really have an impact on cases, transmission and (most importantly) hospitalisations.
    Indeed, let's hope so.

    I have warned my parents that having just been vaccinated doesn't mean they can party like it's 1999 though! Hopefully that message is getting through to all the oldies and we don't see the sort of vaccine parties that have been happening in Israel.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344
    Out of interest, is the UAE vaccinating all its migrant workers too?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    edited February 2021

    Out of interest, is the UAE vaccinating all its migrant workers too?

    Yes, all citizens and residents over 18, free of charge and provided by the government.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,135

    Out of interest, is the UAE vaccinating all its migrant workers too?

    I was wondering about that as well.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946
    Of course the government that would most benefit from external scrutiny is the one least likely to get it - China's.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


  • Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think we all appreciate that the author is not a huge fan either of Boris Johnson or of Brexit as a concept, to put it mildly, but the points he makes are reasonable. An awful lot of people have died and it's no longer possible simply to dismiss the repeated waves of infection and mass death as a case of being wise after the fact. The Government can reasonably be forgiven for the first peak, when the disease was new and everyone was struggling to understand it properly and get the balance of protecting the economy and saving lives right. However, it's arguably a different story when it comes to the delays in Autumn and certainly with respect to the madcap plans to try to have something resembling a "normal" Christmas.

    And yes, I know that the devolved administrations moved broadly in line with the Government, and that other countries made similar mistakes, and that some of the deaths are attributable to bad luck (one thing that Mr Meeks probably should've acknowledged is the role of the Kent variant in exacerbating the crisis, because that was the product of bad luck and such mutations could as easily have arisen in France, Spain and Italy as they did in Britain, Brazil and South Africa.)

    But regardless, here we are. And the possibility of the UK slipping down the grim league table of death in the coming months because of the success of the vaccination drive does nothing to bring back those who have already perished.

    Nor has the capacity for further mistakes to be made been exhausted. Let's just hope that, if politicians scramble to open the schools back up quickly, this doesn't result in yet another avoidable spike in cases. This time around it looks like Scotland and Wales, which currently have lower per capita caseloads than England, will be leading the charge. I hope to God that they know what they're doing.
  • Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    Please do not walk away because of an ill judged piece by someone who has an anti Boris agenda

    However, I am sure you are speaking for many on this forum
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344
    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    edited February 2021

    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
    Do you have a problem remembering the dead? By all means also celebrate the scientists that created the vaccine, but many have lost people and that deserves respect.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    Well written article, but I mostly disagree.

    At the end of the day, the virus is a natural disaster. It’s undone the great job that medical science has done of extending life expectancy over the past century.

    It’s not fair to count the coffins, then point at boris.

    And I’m one of his fiercest critics.
  • Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
    Do you have a problem remembering the dead? By all means also celebrate the scientists that created the vaccine, but many have lost people and that deserves respect.
    I have no doubt there will be a national remembrance memorial and the dreadful toll will be remembered annually
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,509

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    Your comment has no balance, apparently skewed by your hatred of Alastair. Or perhaps idolisation of Boris.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Why not just put up some sort of memorial to pretty much everybody who ever dies of anything, ever? Like we do already? And not devalue memorials to those who died in war, with a usually voluntary assumption of risk on behalf of others and usually at a young age, just to inject an additional frisson of sentiment into our lives?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
    Do you have a problem remembering the dead? By all means also celebrate the scientists that created the vaccine, but many have lost people and that deserves respect.
    I have no doubt there will be a national remembrance memorial and the dreadful toll will be remembered annually
    Well quite, it would makes sense to integrate that into our national services of remembrance. It will help reinforce them as ww1 and ww2 become ever more distant.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Why not just put up some sort of memorial to pretty much everybody who ever dies of anything, ever? Like we do already? And not devalue memorials to those who died in war, with a usually voluntary assumption of risk on behalf of others and usually at a young age, just to inject an additional frisson of sentiment into our lives?
    I can’t see how remembering the victims of the unique pandemic devalues remembering anyone else, arguably quite the reverse.
  • Nigelb said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    Your comment has no balance, apparently skewed by your hatred of Alastair. Or perhaps idolisation of Boris.
    I do not hate but Alastair has long lost all balance on Boris

    And if you follow my posts you will have seen me critise Boris and I have said he is not the person for covid
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,662
    Are we going to have a thread on Starmer losing his cool and squaring up to Boris in the HOC after PMQ's?
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
    Do you have a problem remembering the dead? By all means also celebrate the scientists that created the vaccine, but many have lost people and that deserves respect.
    I have no doubt there will be a national remembrance memorial and the dreadful toll will be remembered annually
    Well quite, it would makes sense to integrate that into our national services of remembrance. It will help reinforce them as ww1 and ww2 become ever more distant.
    What have these people got that other people who just die of, you know, stuff, haven't?

    Should we have a new colour of poppy for them?
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Nigelb said:

    ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    Alastair is consumed with his hatred of Boris and in this unbalanced piece it all flows out
    I think it an excellent piece. 109,000 deaths on Johnson and Drakeford,'s watch.

    Can we absolve Johnson because he got the vaccine right and yet still hang Drakeford for his hand in the death of 109,000 people? Possibly.
    I am not absolving anyone and a public enquiry will follow.

    However, this piece has no balance and indeed on this week, of all weeks, he makes no reference to his beloved Europe and the objectionable behaviour of their leaders which are likely to have a devastating effect on the peoples of Europe.

    I do not see him calling for their resignations
    Your comment has no balance, apparently skewed by your hatred of Alastair. Or perhaps idolisation of Boris.
    I do not hate but Alastair has long lost all balance on Boris

    And if you follow my posts you will have seen me critise Boris and I have said he is not the person for covid
    I'm afraid it's true. All sense of proportion and balance has vanished.

    He has become an embittered old man. It's rather sad.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Blood fountain like in Tehran.


    No, just an engraved list of names 2020~21 than we can remember each November.
    We weren't inclined to do this in the late 60's, with the 40,000 excess deaths from Hong Kong flu (when the UK population was 20% smaller).

    Why not one in gratitude to science, with the name of everybody vaccinated?
    Do you have a problem remembering the dead? By all means also celebrate the scientists that created the vaccine, but many have lost people and that deserves respect.
    I have no doubt there will be a national remembrance memorial and the dreadful toll will be remembered annually
    Well quite, it would makes sense to integrate that into our national services of remembrance. It will help reinforce them as ww1 and ww2 become ever more distant.
    What have these people got that other people who just die of, you know, stuff, haven't?

    Should we have a new colour of poppy for them?
    100,000 excess dead in one year deserve to be remembered by future generations and lessons learned so it never happens again. This is entirely in the spirit of remembrance.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited February 2021

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,474
    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Yeah, what this country needs is more maudlin sentimentality.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,509
    edited February 2021
    .

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    Weren’t you the commenter referring the “fascist censorship” just now ?
    Which seemed a pretty odd description of a comment disagreeing with you.
  • Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    I fear you may be right
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    And can I please remind people that in terms of the global pandemic this is probably barely half-time. Before rushing to write-off the UK it would be better to evaluate the death tally when it's over.

    Which is of course where our vaccination policy comes in. I notice that we're now below France on daily cases. That trend, whilst not linear, is set to accelerate as our vaccinations kick in.

    If you want to evaluate this on death tallies do so after the final whistle.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    Foxy said:

    Jonathan said:

    It would be good to update the cenotaph and town memorials with the names of the COVID dead. Less we forget,

    Yeah, what this country needs is more maudlin sentimentality.
    We need a means to remember what happened and ensure it does not happen again. I don’t think the one day a year remembrance service has ever been maudlin sentimentality.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    We could put up some statues.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Nigelb said:

    .

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    Weren’t you the commenter referring the “fascist censorship” just now ?
    .
    That was because we were told we weren't allowed to mention vaccines or Europe, which is of course absurd. Context is important for intelligent discourse.
  • Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Nigelb said:
    Nigel what's your reading of that? Is it implying the immunocompromised people are a danger to society?

    Seems a very stark way of putting it but is that the inference?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,154
    ping said:

    Well written article, but I mostly disagree.

    At the end of the day, the virus is a natural disaster. It’s undone the great job that medical science has done of extending life expectancy over the past century.

    It’s not fair to count the coffins, then point at boris.

    And I’m one of his fiercest critics.

    I misread that as ‘count the boffins.’ Which works too...
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,055
    Interesting topic, but a more useful comparator would be, perhaps, with the number that lose their lives annually in road accidents; or even with the number of potential people that are aborted.

    Good morning, everyone.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited February 2021

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    Thing is, there aren’t any elections on atm. This site is better with Mr Meeks than without him - he’s one of the sites top tipsters. We should allow him some latitude with his non-betting posts.

    To @Lord_Liverpool - Feel free to write your own header, if it’s any good, I’m sure OGH will publish it.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
    Nah, it’s the only answer. You just don’t like it. This is Mike’s site. If you don’t like or can’t handle opinions different to your own, why not have a flounce, many do. There are many comfortable bubbles out there to wallow in. People do tend to come back.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,474
    IshmaelZ said:

    We could put up some statues.

    Something like the El Alamein fountain in Kings Cross, Sydney? It really does look like a coronavirus!



  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,314
    edited February 2021
    AnneJGP said:

    Interesting topic, but a more useful comparator would be, perhaps, with the number that lose their lives annually in road accidents; or even with the number of potential people that are aborted.

    Good morning, everyone.

    Road accident deaths have been coming down for some time, now around 1,500 in the UK. Cars getting much safer with every generation.

    Abortions, sadly, are going the other way and are now a huge number, somewhere around 220,000 per year in the UK. Way more than a pandemic.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,509

    Nigelb said:

    .

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    Weren’t you the commenter referring the “fascist censorship” just now ?
    .
    That was because we were told we weren't allowed to mention vaccines or Europe, which is of course absurd. Context is important for intelligent discourse.
    ‘We’ weren’t told any such thing, and neither were you.
    Rightly or wrongly, you were criticised for over reliance on that argument; that is neither censorship, nor ‘fascist’.
    Your emotive response to comments, while calling out others for emotive language, does not come across as intelligent discourse.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
    Nah, it’s the only answer. You just don’t like it. This is Mike’s site. If you don’t like or can’t handle opinions different to your own, why not have a flounce, many do. There are many comfortable bubbles out there to wallow in. People do tend to come back.
    The thing is that opinions vary in more than one way. Some are interestingly wrong, some boringly and stupidly so. It is perfectly consistent to agree that a thousand flowers should bloom, and to want to see the boring and stupid ones cleared out.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
    Nah, it’s the only answer. You just don’t like it. This is Mike’s site. If you don’t like or can’t handle opinions different to your own, why not have a flounce, many do. There are many comfortable bubbles out there to wallow in. People do tend to come back.
    The thing is that opinions vary in more than one way. Some are interestingly wrong, some boringly and stupidly so. It is perfectly consistent to agree that a thousand flowers should bloom, and to want to see the boring and stupid ones cleared out.
    It’s entirely subjective, Don’t engage with the stuff you personally don’t find interesting. Go for walk or have a bath. Do whatever it is you actually do. Don’t try to censor it and create yet another tedious bubble on the Internet.
  • guybrushguybrush Posts: 257
    philiph said:

    It is so easy to rant and spray hyperbolic biased views from the comfort of a keyboard.

    Of course the government made mistakes. More lives could have been saved. In doing so more may be destroyed in other ways.

    Obsession with international comparisons is still lacking much useful practical or intellectual validity. Until you take away all the variables from population type, density, adherence, mental health, average BMI, co morbidity health service capaity and many other factors influencing the outcome, you know little of use. In effect you are pissing in the wind, probably being stupid doing it into the wind and howling at the moon.

    We all know the risks we face in life, assess them and select an action. Some actions kill us, some kill others and some don't kill.

    In all probability the worst action is care homes early on.

    I'd tend to agree.

    I'm really not convinced the better performance of other countries can be wholly attributed to policy decisions.

    At any rate, these involve a set of trade-offs around health, the economy, personal freedoms. Effectively suspending the functioning of civil society and the economy isn't without its costs either, the relevant metric can't just be body bags (not to minimise the pain of anyone who's lost those close to them).

    For me, Covid comes pretty close to qualifying as a death from natural cause (even accounting for any revelations coming from the WHO visit to China). Is it reasonable to expect the government to legislate against that?

    I guess it's easy to look back in retrospect, and pinpoint errors. Xmas must be one of thoses. Given the inadequacy of the public health's establishments initial response, I think blame, if it is to be attributed, can't just be levelled on elected officials.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Jonathan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
    Nah, it’s the only answer. You just don’t like it. This is Mike’s site. If you don’t like or can’t handle opinions different to your own, why not have a flounce, many do. There are many comfortable bubbles out there to wallow in. People do tend to come back.
    The thing is that opinions vary in more than one way. Some are interestingly wrong, some boringly and stupidly so. It is perfectly consistent to agree that a thousand flowers should bloom, and to want to see the boring and stupid ones cleared out.
    It’s entirely subjective, Don’t engage with the stuff you personally don’t find interesting. Go for walk or have a bath. Do whatever it is you actually do. Don’t try to censor it and create yet another tedious bubble on the Internet.
    What has pointing out that you are offering mawkish drivel got to do with censoring you? Did you see me saying "mods, ban this guy or i walk?"
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    guybrush said:

    philiph said:

    It is so easy to rant and spray hyperbolic biased views from the comfort of a keyboard.

    Of course the government made mistakes. More lives could have been saved. In doing so more may be destroyed in other ways.

    Obsession with international comparisons is still lacking much useful practical or intellectual validity. Until you take away all the variables from population type, density, adherence, mental health, average BMI, co morbidity health service capaity and many other factors influencing the outcome, you know little of use. In effect you are pissing in the wind, probably being stupid doing it into the wind and howling at the moon.

    We all know the risks we face in life, assess them and select an action. Some actions kill us, some kill others and some don't kill.

    In all probability the worst action is care homes early on.

    I'd tend to agree.

    I'm really not convinced the better performance of other countries can be wholly attributed to policy decisions.

    At any rate, these involve a set of trade-offs around health, the economy, personal freedoms. Effectively suspending the functioning of civil society and the economy isn't without its costs either, the relevant metric can't just be body bags (not to minimise the pain of anyone who's lost those close to them).

    For me, Covid comes pretty close to qualifying as a death from natural cause (even accounting for any revelations coming from the WHO visit to China). Is it reasonable to expect the government to legislate against that?

    I guess it's easy to look back in retrospect, and pinpoint errors. Xmas must be one of thoses. Given the inadequacy of the public health's establishments initial response, I think blame, if it is to be attributed, can't just be levelled on elected officials.
    It’s not about blame, it’s about learning and remembering the lessons of this catastrophe so future generations do not experience it again.
  • People die. It is sad. We should remember them.

    Mr Meeks doesn't want that. He wants revenge for Brexit. He doesn't want the dead remembered he wants the Government to fall because he hates them. That won't bring anyone back from the dead, it will however soothe Mr Meeks anger for having lost the Brexit debate.

    The single most important issue of the pandemic is how to end the pandemic; vaccines are the best way to do this. On this, the most important issue of all, then the UK is doing very well. Let's hope it continues so we can move on.

    If the pandemic could be over thanks to vaccines but isn't, then every month the pandemic drags on with our civil liberties trashed, with the economy trashed, with people unable to see their families ... is every bit as bad as deaths.

    More people will have died from non Covid reasons in the past 12 months having had their final year wrecked by the pandemic. It should be imperative on us all to end this as soon as it is safe to do so.
  • ...but we've vaccinated over 10,000,000 people, no other metric matters anymore. Although perhaps it should!

    As the vaccine isn't directly tied to the number who dies, we could have had far fewer deaths and still vaccinated 10m people. We could have not forcibly moved Covid+ patients from hospital into care homes. We could have closed the border when it mattered. We could have had the circuit break that SAGE demanded and not done the "kill your granny for Christmas disaster". And still have vaccinated 10m people.

    The death of friends and family absolutely matters to the people affected.
  • I think criticism of the governmentS could currently more usefully be directed at the shambolic management of the border. The Scottish government has announced they will “go further” than the U.K. - I await details with bated breath (as do Scottish Airports and airport hotels) - perhaps the more joyous and civic Nats can lead rather than carp? Rhetoric is easy but governing is hard.

    Yes, there must be an understanding of what went well and what went badly - but I’d suggest today we should be focusing on what we can do NOW rather than what we should have done yesterday.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    I feel the same.

    I like this site for mostly good debate on threads that, certainly in Mike's case, are invariably betting related.

    This has bugger all to do with betting. It's just bile from an embittered man who lost on Brexit.

    Sort it out OGH or your regulars will depart this site.
    The response to comments like this is, “see yer”.
    And you run the risk of losing many varied and good contributors by comments like that
    It’s Mike site, if you don’t like it, hop it, Very easy.
    This is the lazy man's answer.
    Nah, it’s the only answer. You just don’t like it. This is Mike’s site. If you don’t like or can’t handle opinions different to your own, why not have a flounce, many do. There are many comfortable bubbles out there to wallow in. People do tend to come back.
    The thing is that opinions vary in more than one way. Some are interestingly wrong, some boringly and stupidly so. It is perfectly consistent to agree that a thousand flowers should bloom, and to want to see the boring and stupid ones cleared out.
    It’s entirely subjective, Don’t engage with the stuff you personally don’t find interesting. Go for walk or have a bath. Do whatever it is you actually do. Don’t try to censor it and create yet another tedious bubble on the Internet.
    What has pointing out that you are offering mawkish drivel got to do with censoring you? Did you see me saying "mods, ban this guy or i walk?"
    Others up thread chucked out a load of petty ad hom and indeed threatened to walk.
  • Excellent thread.

    PB Tories whataboutery re vaccines does not absolve this Government from its disgraceful performance.

    I'm not a tory and 'disgraceful performance' are words best reserved for the EU on vaccines. You can't absolve the British public from blame, although lefties are trying. I STILL see loads of people in shops, on public transport and indoor spaces without face masks. In some parts face mask wearing seems under 50%. Parties and meet-ups are still taking place and people are still socialising and travelling for pleasure. That is NOT Boris' fault.
    How is it not Boris's fault? How does the Prime Minister of the UK get magically absolved of leadership responsibilities?

    There would always have been a minority of people not complying. And the system should have warned them that they would be dealt with harshly. Had the government issued the kind of clear, unambiguous warnings that pretty much every other western country managed then our death toll would have been a lot lower.

    Its frankly shameful - to you - that you are working so hard this morning to wave your team's scarf and insist that they have no responsibility.

  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited February 2021
    Jonathan said:

    guybrush said:

    philiph said:

    It is so easy to rant and spray hyperbolic biased views from the comfort of a keyboard.

    Of course the government made mistakes. More lives could have been saved. In doing so more may be destroyed in other ways.

    Obsession with international comparisons is still lacking much useful practical or intellectual validity. Until you take away all the variables from population type, density, adherence, mental health, average BMI, co morbidity health service capaity and many other factors influencing the outcome, you know little of use. In effect you are pissing in the wind, probably being stupid doing it into the wind and howling at the moon.

    We all know the risks we face in life, assess them and select an action. Some actions kill us, some kill others and some don't kill.

    In all probability the worst action is care homes early on.

    I'd tend to agree.

    I'm really not convinced the better performance of other countries can be wholly attributed to policy decisions.

    At any rate, these involve a set of trade-offs around health, the economy, personal freedoms. Effectively suspending the functioning of civil society and the economy isn't without its costs either, the relevant metric can't just be body bags (not to minimise the pain of anyone who's lost those close to them).

    For me, Covid comes pretty close to qualifying as a death from natural cause (even accounting for any revelations coming from the WHO visit to China). Is it reasonable to expect the government to legislate against that?

    I guess it's easy to look back in retrospect, and pinpoint errors. Xmas must be one of thoses. Given the inadequacy of the public health's establishments initial response, I think blame, if it is to be attributed, can't just be levelled on elected officials.
    It’s not about blame, it’s about learning and remembering the lessons of this catastrophe so future generations do not experience it again.
    Absolutely. If you want to do it properly that is right.

    Some lessons will be things we have done right - like vaccines and genomic sequencing - and the rest of the world should learn to do more like we did.

    Some lessons will be things we did wrong - like not recommending facemasks instantly or closing the border.

    Others will probably be forever debated, like at what point to call a lockdown.
  • A typical Alastair Meeks article. Within three words it was obvious who authored it. It's not just the tortuous flowery language. It's the constant diatribes against the Conservatives. Boris was big to take full responsibility, a much bigger person than Meeks. Because it's not just his fault. The Brits are a recalcitrant lot. We don't listen and we don't follow rules: from social distancing, to face mask wearing (STILL) and lockdown.

    Yep, the Gov't screwed up early on. Nope, we won't forget that lots died. However, it's also time to stop being moaning whinge-bags (Alastair), be thankful for the brilliance of the vaccine rollout and for the living to get on with living.

    Every Whatabouutery the vaccine the vaccine the vaccine comment like yours

    Makes Alistair points look even more right.
    W
    Don't forget to include the word Europe in your next Whataboutery response though.
    You seem to think 'whataboutery' is a one-way street, well that's not how intelligent discourse works.

    If you wish to focus solely on death, fine, do so. I think it's mistaken but if that's your only criteria then so be it. But in that case have the decency and intelligence to await the final tallies. A year from now you may well find the overall picture looks a little different.

    Besides, I'm not going to succumb to your fascist censorship. Vaccination is the route out for the majority who won't have died from this pandemic and so it's right to point to the stunning, stellar, success of the Government.

    yours, a Labour voter.
    What fascist censorship is that, Labour voter? I see not the teeniest restraint upon your daily paean to the Vaccination and its Dear Leader.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    edited February 2021

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    Don`t go.

    I guess the header IS a political betting tip of sorts. Meeks must be attracted to the 3.85 with BF that Labour will win a majority at the next election.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555

    Jonathan said:

    guybrush said:

    philiph said:

    It is so easy to rant and spray hyperbolic biased views from the comfort of a keyboard.

    Of course the government made mistakes. More lives could have been saved. In doing so more may be destroyed in other ways.

    Obsession with international comparisons is still lacking much useful practical or intellectual validity. Until you take away all the variables from population type, density, adherence, mental health, average BMI, co morbidity health service capaity and many other factors influencing the outcome, you know little of use. In effect you are pissing in the wind, probably being stupid doing it into the wind and howling at the moon.

    We all know the risks we face in life, assess them and select an action. Some actions kill us, some kill others and some don't kill.

    In all probability the worst action is care homes early on.

    I'd tend to agree.

    I'm really not convinced the better performance of other countries can be wholly attributed to policy decisions.

    At any rate, these involve a set of trade-offs around health, the economy, personal freedoms. Effectively suspending the functioning of civil society and the economy isn't without its costs either, the relevant metric can't just be body bags (not to minimise the pain of anyone who's lost those close to them).

    For me, Covid comes pretty close to qualifying as a death from natural cause (even accounting for any revelations coming from the WHO visit to China). Is it reasonable to expect the government to legislate against that?

    I guess it's easy to look back in retrospect, and pinpoint errors. Xmas must be one of thoses. Given the inadequacy of the public health's establishments initial response, I think blame, if it is to be attributed, can't just be levelled on elected officials.
    It’s not about blame, it’s about learning and remembering the lessons of this catastrophe so future generations do not experience it again.
    Absolutely. If you want to do it properly that is right.

    Some lessons will be things we have done right - like vaccines - and the rest of the world should learn to do more like we did.

    Some lessons will be things we did wrong - like not recommending facemasks instantly.

    Others will probably be forever debated, like at what point to call a lockdown.
    The biggest lesson for me is that every second counts and half hearted measures don’t work. So get on it straight away and go hard, Saves lives and saves money. This learning applies to vaccine development, social distancing, masks, the whole shebang.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,509

    Nigelb said:
    Nigel what's your reading of that? Is it implying the immunocompromised people are a danger to society?

    Seems a very stark way of putting it but is that the inference?
    Most of those with very severe Covid are effectively immunocompromised.
    Point is that mutations which evade immune response most readily occur when the immune system isn’t working very well.
    They will also occur in the normal course of transmission, but at a much lower rate.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,555
    Stocky said:

    Politicalbetting is an excellent site and I have enjoyed coming here (and very occasionally posting) over the past 15 years. The insight on the future being the main reason.

    But this post is the last straw. I am no fan of Boris but this has nothing to do with political betting and is just pure political vitriol that I can go and read on the Canary if I want to.

    Good to luck to OGH and all of you but I vote with my feet.

    Don`t go.

    I guess the header IS a political betting tip of sorts. Meeks must be attracted to the 3.85 with BF that Labour will win a majority at the next election.
    A flounce is a key part of the PB experience. Usually lasts 2-3 weeks. Normally something happens in the news that demands just one comment and then they’re off again.
  • Excellent thread.

    PB Tories whataboutery re vaccines does not absolve this Government from its disgraceful performance.

    I'm not a tory and 'disgraceful performance' are words best reserved for the EU on vaccines. You can't absolve the British public from blame, although lefties are trying. I STILL see loads of people in shops, on public transport and indoor spaces without face masks. In some parts face mask wearing seems under 50%. Parties and meet-ups are still taking place and people are still socialising and travelling for pleasure. That is NOT Boris' fault.
    How is it not Boris's fault? How does the Prime Minister of the UK get magically absolved of leadership responsibilities?

    There would always have been a minority of people not complying. And the system should have warned them that they would be dealt with harshly. Had the government issued the kind of clear, unambiguous warnings that pretty much every other western country managed then our death toll would have been a lot lower.

    Its frankly shameful - to you - that you are working so hard this morning to wave your team's scarf and insist that they have no responsibility.

    I thought you called yourself a Liberal now?

    Governments wherever possible should give advice and let people decide for themselves - and the public needs to take responsibility for their own actions too which can have consequences for others, it isn't on the PM of the day to make all our decisions for us.
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,396

    Excellent thread.

    PB Tories whataboutery re vaccines does not absolve this Government from its disgraceful performance.

    I'm not a tory and 'disgraceful performance' are words best reserved for the EU on vaccines. You can't absolve the British public from blame, although lefties are trying. I STILL see loads of people in shops, on public transport and indoor spaces without face masks. In some parts face mask wearing seems under 50%. Parties and meet-ups are still taking place and people are still socialising and travelling for pleasure. That is NOT Boris' fault.
    You don’t think Boris’s refusal to sack his sidekick when he was caught flouting the rules has contributed to the problem?
This discussion has been closed.