Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Leaver or Limpet – How long with Johnson lead? – politicalbetting.com

1234579

Comments

  • ydoethur said:

    Sounds pretty far fetched. When did Johnson ever have strategies?
    He doesn't have strategies to run the country.

    But as a gang leader, which is what he needs to GBD, he's impressive.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,437

    Since I'm on cullinarychat.com

    I made lamb kofta meat Scotch eggs this weekend.

    They were awesome.

    My home made massaman curry was the talk of Stodge Towers this evening.
  • gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    MaxPB said:

    Personally I think a way out of this is buying two years of "deal implementation period" which keeps the three contentious issues frozen for two more years for two years worth of contributions, in that time a new tariff agreement can be worked into the eventual trade deal and we can "implement" the other parts of the deal in theory while staying in the same state we are now.

    That's the kind of fudge that would work, as long as it has "deal" in it and it kicks fish, LPF and governance down the road for two years while some serious prep work for customs and trusted trader schemes are done as part of the "deal implementation" stuff then I can see the MPs living with it.
    I like your can kicking fudge idea. 🙂.

    Is it politically doable on the British side, not in terms of big majority in commons but in irrecoverable drift in public support. 38% of Tory support in polls is people who believed in Boris delivering brexit not fudging it.
  • The difficulty Johnson has now is Leaver skepticism. Any deal will be pored over with Brexiteer gusto, and whatever the deal, they won't like it.
    Is it not the case that everyone already knows that Hardcore ERG types are going to object to anything short of No Deal and that as such they have overplayed their hand. Almost anything can now be portrayed as them being unwilling to accept any deal.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,203
    rcs1000 said:

    That would be the right thing to do.

    (The funny bit, of course, is that 2024 might be fought by a Trumpian candidate promising to pack the Court to get rid of all the lily livered liberals like ACB, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.)
    It'd be funny if SCOTUS decertified the entire PA state legislature.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113

    So what? Labour are going to abstain or support any deal so Johnson can stand 50-80 rebels or more on his own side.
    Exactly so. He is not shackled to anyone. SKS has given him a blank cheque in the national interest (and commendations to him for doing so). He can present any deal he likes to the Commons and it will sail through. The remainer Parliament of 2017-19 is a distant and unpleasant memory. The question for him is what deal is not worse than no deal? Some would argue any deal, some would say that there is still a tipping point. I think he is genuinely in the latter camp.
  • Do you like the taste? I prefer to have cereal with no milk, and black coffee, than use UHT milk. I might get a few cartons for emergencies though.
    I mostly use it to make yoghurt to be honest.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,266

    He's half baked enough.
    Do me a fava and stop this terrible punning, pease.
  • gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    DavidL said:

    Nailed on. I think that the forecasts are something like 5% growth next year as we recover from Covid. Good luck to those who want to argue it would have been 6% with a better (any) deal.

    My main reason for wanting a deal is that the idea of debating this ad nauseam is just too depressing for words.
    🤣. Even double digit growth won’t be debated next year, it will be wall to wall import export chaos!
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,905
    edited December 2020
    Would be ironic if covid self-isolation spoilt the chances of the big in-person meeting.
  • Peter "Tebbit" Bone looking very chipper on Channel 4 News. "We've got total confidence that the Prime Minister won't come back from Brussels with a bad deal." Either he, Redwood and others are trying to box him in with friendly warnings, or they're genuinely confident Johnson will return with an Albania-style deal ( no deal ).

    Boris's charm and guile could have easily won over those dimwits, albeit temporarily. He just needs a sufficient chunk of them to think he's done what they wanted until it's too late.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,203
    DavidL said:

    Exactly so. He is not shackled to anyone. SKS has given him a blank cheque in the national interest (and commendations to him for doing so). He can present any deal he likes to the Commons and it will sail through. The remainer Parliament of 2017-19 is a distant and unpleasant memory. The question for him is what deal is not worse than no deal? Some would argue any deal, some would say that there is still a tipping point. I think he is genuinely in the latter camp.
    I expect he'll abstain - it does put all the pressure on Boris to actually get a deal now (Correctly). If Boris doesn't, well Starmer can hardly be blamed !
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113
    gealbhan said:

    🤣. Even double digit growth won’t be debated next year, it will be wall to wall import export chaos!
    Probably, sigh. Every tray of fresh salad that goes to waste another talking point. I can hardly wait.
  • gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    Pulpstar said:

    Labour should have folded to get May's original deal through parliament.
    But that's long gone.
    Boris now needs to fold to preserve UK industry.

    What exactly are you referring to as industry?

    So much of manufacturing is supply chain to assemblage in U.K. or EU?

    Whatever happens this week, globalisation, deindustrialisation and post industrial ain’t going anywhere, our economy continuing to evolve so the future is services and retraining for that? How exactly are we doing now, and going forward v the EU on services? Particularly financial services that pays for government spending and allows us a generous NHS and Welfare State.
  • DavidL said:

    Probably, sigh. Every tray of fresh salad that goes to waste another talking point. I can hardly wait.
    Look on the bright side, No Deal ensures a SNP majority in May, and well that might be the trigger for a UDI or Indyref2.

    PB will be talking about that a lot.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,814
    Well at least the tedium will soon be over. We’ll either get a triumphant fist pumping scene as the deal which most here see as impossible gets down. Or we’ll get an amusing Eyes down the Lens “no deal it is folks” speech.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113

    Look on the bright side, No Deal ensures a SNP majority in May, and well that might be the trigger for a UDI or Indyref2.

    PB will be talking about that a lot.
    Regrettably Indyref2 is looking inevitable. Some people will not take no for an answer. If its not this it will be something else. The grievance machine grinds on remorselessly.
  • Pulpstar said:

    I expect he'll abstain - it does put all the pressure on Boris to actually get a deal now (Correctly). If Boris doesn't, well Starmer can hardly be blamed !
    Politically Sir Keir is in a strange situation. He has to say he wants a deal and has to do everything he can to support it, but it would be an absolute gift for him if Boris didn't get one.
  • DavidL said:

    Regrettably Indyref2 is looking inevitable. Some people will not take no for an answer. If its not this it will be something else. The grievance machine grinds on remorselessly.
    If only someone had warned Leavers like you that Brexit made Scottish independence much more likely.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113
    Pulpstar said:

    I expect he'll abstain - it does put all the pressure on Boris to actually get a deal now (Correctly). If Boris doesn't, well Starmer can hardly be blamed !
    General Indecision rides again! But that will probably be enough. Even in the current Tory party there are only about 80 nutters and the thick end of 280 pragmatists.
  • moonshine said:

    Well at least the tedium will soon be over. We’ll either get a triumphant fist pumping scene as the deal which most here see as impossible gets down. Or we’ll get an amusing Eyes down the Lens “no deal it is folks” speech.

    Boris had to do the coffin-lid face thing when Dave resigned. I don't think he relished it much, which is why I'm fairly confident a deal will be struck.
  • If only someone had warned Leavers like you that Brexit made Scottish independence much more likely.
    David has a point though that if it wasn't Brexit it would be something else.
  • moonshine said:

    Well at least the tedium will soon be over. We’ll either get a triumphant fist pumping scene as the deal which most here see as impossible gets down. Or we’ll get an amusing Eyes down the Lens “no deal it is folks” speech.

    I suspect I'll be happy either way.
  • David has a point though that if it wasn't Brexit it would be something else.
    And Scots would have laughed at the SNP grievance mongering if they tried to trigger Indyref2 because David Cameron said something rude to Angus Robertson.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113

    If only someone had warned Leavers like you that Brexit made Scottish independence much more likely.
    It doesn't make it more likely. It just means we need to have the argument all over again. Which we would have had to have had at some point anyway. On the plus side anyone who argues a divorce from England will be straightforward will surely get laughed at, even in Scotland.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113
    That's got to be good for at least a week. Maybe 10 days.
  • DavidL said:

    It doesn't make it more likely. It just means we need to have the argument all over again. Which we would have had to have had at some point anyway. On the plus side anyone who argues a divorce from England will be straightforward will surely get laughed at, even in Scotland.
    Nah, Scots just have to believe in Indy a bit harder.
  • And Scots would have laughed at the SNP grievance mongering if they tried to trigger Indyref2 because David Cameron said something rude to Angus Robertson.
    The Scots in 2016 had Holyrood and all but three Westminster seats. Before Brexit.

    They are professional grievance mongers with a platform, if it wasn't Brexit they would find something else.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113

    Nah, Scots just have to believe in Indy a bit harder.
    Sadly, for more than 40% of the population that is completely true. For another 40% it is truly laughable. The 20% in the middle will decide.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,800
    Gaming news - Cyberpunk 2077 has got it's reviews out, it looks amazing. From the makers of The Witcher. I'm going to get it when the PS5 patch is out.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318

    And Scots would have laughed at the SNP grievance mongering if they tried to trigger Indyref2 because David Cameron said something rude to Angus Robertson.
    People generally aren’t rude about Robertson, who has pretty wide respect across all parties.

    And of course people can’t be rude about Blackford as what could you possibly say that’s worse than the truth?
  • DavidL said:

    It doesn't make it more likely. It just means we need to have the argument all over again. Which we would have had to have had at some point anyway. On the plus side anyone who argues a divorce from England will be straightforward will surely get laughed at, even in Scotland.
    So will anyone bleating about the process for removing our EU citizenship or uncertainty or the best of both worlds.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Brexit not even making minor headlines in Spain
  • gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362

    I suspect I'll be happy either way.
    I hope you remain happy, and many people with you.

    No laughs now. This evening is chilling. Like the day Henry picked up the hunting wound that couldn’t heal no matter how much seaweed they packed into it.

    What are the advantages disadvantages of being an MP? Augustus Melmotte spent plenty money finding out.

    This is it. This is the end. Where the bad member goes down and dies.

    The EU don’t want a deal. Their bottom line so high from the start. They are happy to rise from the table and walk away now.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,160

    Is it not the case that everyone already knows that Hardcore ERG types are going to object to anything short of No Deal and that as such they have overplayed their hand. Almost anything can now be portrayed as them being unwilling to accept any deal.
    I wasn't suggesting the ERG have overplayed their hand. I was suggesting Johnson is now their hostage.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,113

    And Scots would have laughed at the SNP grievance mongering if they tried to trigger Indyref2 because David Cameron said something rude to Angus Robertson.
    There's always going to be something. It will no doubt be Westminster's fault that the SNP have completely destroyed the High Street economy. I am staying in Edinburgh again tonight. Locked down shops that may never re-open, dead pubs and restaurants with wooden windows. Utter devastation. All Boris's fault of course. Bound to be.
  • gealbhan said:

    I hope you remain happy, and many people with you.

    No laughs now. This evening is chilling. Like the day Henry picked up the hunting wound that couldn’t heal no matter how much seaweed they packed into it.

    What are the advantages disadvantages of being an MP? Augustus Melmotte spent plenty money finding out.

    This is it. This is the end. Where the bad member goes down and dies.

    The EU don’t want a deal. Their bottom line so high from the start. They are happy to rise from the table and walk away now.
    If the EU want to walk away then we can too. Takes two to tango.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861
    edited December 2020

    Look on the bright side, No Deal ensures a SNP majority in May, and well that might be the trigger for a UDI or Indyref2.

    PB will be talking about that a lot.
    So what, even if it does Boris will follow the Madrid line with Catalonia I understand and refuse to allow a lawful indyref2, urge all Unionists to boycott such a vote and ignore any UDI.

    The Act of Union is clear that Westminster and Westminster alone is sovereign over Scotland, indeed Holyrood is merely a creation of Westminster and there can be no ending of the Act of Union without Westminster consent
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,160
    gealbhan said:

    I hope you remain happy, and many people with you.

    No laughs now. This evening is chilling. Like the day Henry picked up the hunting wound that couldn’t heal no matter how much seaweed they packed into it.

    What are the advantages disadvantages of being an MP? Augustus Melmotte spent plenty money finding out.

    This is it. This is the end. Where the bad member goes down and dies.

    The EU don’t want a deal. Their bottom line so high from the start. They are happy to rise from the table and walk away now.
    We hold all the cards!
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318
    HYUFD said:

    So what, even if it does Boris will follow the Madrid line I understand and refuse to allow a lawful indyref2, urge all Unionists to boycott such a vote and ignore any UDI.

    The Act of Union is clear that Westminster and Westminster alone is sovereign over Scotland, indeed Holyrood is merely a creation of Westminster and there can be no ending of the Act of Union without Westminster consent
    It’s just as well all our nukes are already in Scotland.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    I suspect I'll be happy either way.
    I suspect you will.

    You have out done HYUFD in your blind loyalty no matter what.

  • HYUFD said:

    So what, even if it does Boris will follow the Madrid line with Catalonia I understand and refuse to allow a lawful indyref2, urge all Unionists to boycott such a vote and ignore any UDI.

    The Act of Union is clear that Westminster and Westminster alone is sovereign over Scotland, indeed Holyrood is merely a creation of Westminster and there can be no ending of the Act of Union without Westminster consent
    If the Scots vote for independence they have a mandate to leave. No if's or buts, we English are not Spaniards and believe in democracy not Franco.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318

    We hold all the cards!
    Shame we’re playing Ludo.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,455
    TimT said:

    Always open to new techniques. Will definitely give that a go.
    It does take ages. Like 20 mins rather than 3-4.
  • HYUFD said:

    So what, even if it does Boris will follow the Madrid line I understand and refuse to allow a lawful indyref2, urge all Unionists to boycott such a vote and ignore any UDI.

    The Act of Union is clear that Westminster and Westminster alone is sovereign over Scotland, indeed Holyrood is merely a creation of Westminster and there can be no ending of the Act of Union without Westminster consent
    Sorry but you're an absolute roaster.

    Anyone following the Madrid precedent is a fascist.

    The Catalonia precedent is the equivalent of if on June 23rd 2016 the EU also had a referendum on whether to let the UK leave, and they said no.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861
    ydoethur said:

    It’s just as well all our nukes are already in Scotland.
    Only the UK PM has the authority to order our nukes to be launched
  • I suspect you will.

    You have out done HYUFD in your blind loyalty no matter what.

    Bullshit.

    I have repeatedly criticised the government this year when I feel the need to do so and called for u turns.

    Plus I advocate Scottish independence. Some Tory loyalist. 🙄🤦🏻‍♂️
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,413
    HYUFD said:
    I think every manifesto says they believe in giving more power to local councils. It's one of those things parties say they want to do, yet somehow it always remains on the list for next time too.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318
    HYUFD said:

    Only the UK PM has the authority to order our nukes to be launched
    I was suggesting that in the event of your solutions being adopted, they wouldn’t have a long journey.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861
    edited December 2020

    Sorry but you're an absolute roaster.

    Anyone following the Madrid precedent is a fascist.

    The Catalonia precedent is the equivalent of if on June 23rd 2016 the EU also had a referendum on whether to let the UK leave, and they said no.
    No, the Popular Party in Spain is the sister party of the Tory Party and was democratically elected when its leader and the Spanish PM in 2017 banned a lawful Catalan independence referendum, urged a Unionist boycott, refused to recognise the result of that illegal referendum once held, ordered the arrest of Catalan nationalist leaders and suspended the Catalan Parliament.

    The EU is not a sovereign country, Spain and the UK are
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318

    Bullshit.

    I have repeatedly criticised the government this year when I feel the need to do so and called for u turns.

    Plus I advocate Scottish independence. Some Tory loyalist. 🙄🤦🏻‍♂️
    Much more Machiavellian. You foresee how hard it will be for Labour to become a serious political force again without Scotland, so you’re setting up power for the next ten years.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318
    HYUFD said:

    No, the Popular Party in Spain is our sister party and was democratically elected when its leader and the Spanish PM on 2017 banned a lawful Catalan independence referendum, urged a Unionist boycott, refused to recognise the result of that illegal referendum once held, ordered the arrest of Catalan nationalist leaders and suspended the Catalan Parliament.

    The EU is not a sovereign country, Spain and the UK are
    Ummm - banned a lawful referendum?

    Sounds pretty fascist to me.
  • Is it me or does it like there's more than 2,000 fans at Brighton v. Southampton?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    But like Max I'm expecting no deal, I've been prepping for no deal since 2016.

    Unless you are currently auditing your Brexit stockpile I do not know how seriously to take you.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861

    If the Scots vote for independence they have a mandate to leave. No if's or buts, we English are not Spaniards and believe in democracy not Franco.
    If you refuse to respect the once in a generation No vote of Scots in 2014 then you can return to voting Labour as you did in 2001, Starmer has said he will grant an indyref2 if the SNP win a majority next year and he becomes PM in 2024, however we Tories and Boris have been clear 2014 was a once in a generation vote, no ifs, no buts
  • TresTres Posts: 2,810
    HYUFD said:

    If you refuse to respect the once in a generation No vote of Scots in 2014 then you can return to voting Labour as you did in 2001, Starmer has said he will grant an indyref2 if the SNP win a majority next year and he becomes PM in 2024, however we Tories and Boris have been clear 2014 was a once in a generation vote, no ifs, no buts
    More Johnsonian lies.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    TimT said:

    Unless the Justices are so pissed off at Trump's abuse of the judicial system that they want the opportunity to throw it back in Trump's face with prejudice.
    If I was a Conservative Supreme Court jautice who wanted to prevent Biden packing the court I would be looking to deliver a constitutionally meaningless but visceral smack down of Trump right about now to appease the Dems.
  • Alistair said:

    Unless you are currently auditing your Brexit stockpile I do not know how seriously to take you.
    My father hoards like a doomsday prepper, he's been so unbearably smug* ever since lockdown started in March saying we didn't run out of anything whilst the country went mad.

    He's even more stocked up for No Deal.

    *Thank goodness being unbearably smug isn't hereditary, I'd hate to have such an affliction.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    Thanks. I'll take a look.
    Take this refferal code, it's dangerous out there.

    https://cook.gousto.co.uk/raf?promo_code=ALIST11709252&utm_source=androidapp
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,100
    edited December 2020
    HYUFD said:

    If you refuse to respect the once in a generation No vote of Scots in 2014 then you can return to voting Labour as you did in 2001, Starmer has said he will grant an indyref2 if the SNP win a majority next year and he becomes PM in 2024, however we Tories and Boris have been clear 2014 was a once in a generation vote, no ifs, no buts
    Can you please stop repeating yourself. It's so boring.
  • kle4 said:

    I think every manifesto says they believe in giving more power to local councils. It's one of those things parties say they want to do, yet somehow it always remains on the list for next time too.
    One think people hate more than they like local government is a postcode lottery. Go figure.
  • ydoethur said:

    Much more Machiavellian. You foresee how hard it will be for Labour to become a serious political force again without Scotland, so you’re setting up power for the next ten years.
    https://youtu.be/CFg7esxnrXs
  • One option for the UK and EU.

    Pass legislation to say we're moving back to the Julian calendar from tomorrow, that gives them nearly an extra fortnight to sort out a deal.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,160
    ydoethur said:

    Much more Machiavellian. You foresee how hard it will be for Labour to become a serious political force again without Scotland, so you’re setting up power for the next ten years.
    A fiendishly clever plan that fails on only one front. Conservative owned no deal chaos will result in a straight fight between Labour and the Lib Dems for GE2024.
  • This is embarrassing as it is offensive. Trump lawyers are as dumb as a box of turds.

    I mean they are suing the wrong party for starters.

    https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1336048463096795136
  • I don't think you got the allusion. Not a Curb fan?
    Big Curb fan.

    Sorry, long day.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,242
    MaxPB said:

    Gaming news - Cyberpunk 2077 has got it's reviews out, it looks amazing. From the makers of The Witcher. I'm going to get it when the PS5 patch is out.

    “Cyberpunk 2077” wants to be the “Witcher 3” of crime dramas, and it very much hits that high bar in almost every regard. The writing is an engaging thrill ride that’s going to leave you wondering what’s going to happen next. Conversations flow with natural pacing, emotion and wit to stay entertaining and grounded. And they all take place in the evocative sheen and grime of a cyberpunk world. I’d leave a bar in Night City and feel like I spent some actual time in a smoky, low-lit environment for the last hour, having cigarette smoke blown in my face and smelling like whiskey. In its design, it is to 2020 what “Red Dead Redemption 2” was to 2018.

    ...

    It’s a good thing “Cyberpunk 2077” gets so many details right, because in its current prelaunch state, it’s … what you’d expect from a launch CDPR game. Before “Witcher 3” became the darling of the industry, it was released in a famously buggy state. “Cyberpunk 2077” continues this tradition despite seven years in development, several delays and worrying reports of overtime crunch.

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,617
    HYUFD said:

    If you refuse to respect the once in a generation No vote of Scots in 2014 then you can return to voting Labour as you did in 2001, Starmer has said he will grant an indyref2 if the SNP win a majority next year and he becomes PM in 2024, however we Tories and Boris have been clear 2014 was a once in a generation vote, no ifs, no buts
    Please change the record. It's got an unaccountably deep scratch in the vinyl.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,148

    One option for the UK and EU.

    Pass legislation to say we're moving back to the Julian calendar from tomorrow, that gives them nearly an extra fortnight to sort out a deal.

    Declare a do-over for 2020 as a whole - gain a whole year.
  • Pulpstar said:

    I expect he'll abstain - it does put all the pressure on Boris to actually get a deal now (Correctly). If Boris doesn't, well Starmer can hardly be blamed !
    I think Starmer backs as his play at the next GE will be that the Deal was thin and he wants to "thicken" it. Easier movement of professionals, 2 year visas for young people, services, Erasmus and horizon etc.

    He'll do closer alignment and freer (but not free) movement and more on services. Maybe he'll bung in more cash to the EU too. But he won't rejoin.

    For that position to be credible he first has to vote for the base of the flan, not against it.
  • Alistair said:

    Take this refferal code, it's dangerous out there.

    https://cook.gousto.co.uk/raf?promo_code=ALIST11709252&utm_source=androidapp
    Very kind, thank you.
  • This is embarrassing as it is offensive. Trump lawyers are as dumb as a box of turds.

    I mean they are suing the wrong party for starters.

    https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1336048463096795136

    I think you are assuming the intended audience for the hearing is the court but it is probably aimed more at parler and maga twitter. They prefer Biden et al to be the bad guys.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,558
    edited December 2020

    Or we could adopt the French revolutionary calendar and not have to worry for the best part of 2000 years.
    Only if we get rid of the aristos that rule us as well.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,800
    rcs1000 said:

    “Cyberpunk 2077” wants to be the “Witcher 3” of crime dramas, and it very much hits that high bar in almost every regard. The writing is an engaging thrill ride that’s going to leave you wondering what’s going to happen next. Conversations flow with natural pacing, emotion and wit to stay entertaining and grounded. And they all take place in the evocative sheen and grime of a cyberpunk world. I’d leave a bar in Night City and feel like I spent some actual time in a smoky, low-lit environment for the last hour, having cigarette smoke blown in my face and smelling like whiskey. In its design, it is to 2020 what “Red Dead Redemption 2” was to 2018.

    ...

    It’s a good thing “Cyberpunk 2077” gets so many details right, because in its current prelaunch state, it’s … what you’d expect from a launch CDPR game. Before “Witcher 3” became the darling of the industry, it was released in a famously buggy state. “Cyberpunk 2077” continues this tradition despite seven years in development, several delays and worrying reports of overtime crunch.

    Yeah that last paragraph is why I'm waiting it out for the PS5 version, gives them time to fix the bugs and for the next gen version which is going to look super amazing on my 65" OLED TV.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    Look on the bright side, No Deal ensures a SNP majority in May, and well that might be the trigger for a UDI or Indyref2.

    PB will be talking about that a lot.

    Look on the bright side, No Deal ensures a SNP majority in May, and well that might be the trigger for a UDI or Indyref2.

    PB will be talking about that a lot.
    I cannot see UDI happening. Sturgeon is not that stupid. Were she to go down that road , many pro-Union Scots would be likely to reject Holrood's authority whilst continuing to accept that of Westminster.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861

    A fiendishly clever plan that fails on only one front. Conservative owned no deal chaos will result in a straight fight between Labour and the Lib Dems for GE2024.
    No it won't', the Tories will always get a third of the vote whatever happens, the only way they don't is if Farage's new party overtakes them because Boris does too soft a Brexit.

    Labour and the LDs are never going to overtake the Tories on the right, only Farage could do that as he did last Spring
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,203

    I think you are assuming the intended audience for the hearing is the court but it is probably aimed more at parler and maga twitter. They prefer Biden et al to be the bad guys.
    It'd suit the Democrats to have SCOTUS vitiate both the PA and the WI legislature, and thus have the Democrat governors run things for 2 years in those states.
    That's what they're suing for right ?
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    edited December 2020
    Deleted!
  • Carnyx said:

    Please change the record. It's got an unaccountably deep scratch in the vinyl.
    It sure has
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861
    ydoethur said:

    Much more Machiavellian. You foresee how hard it will be for Labour to become a serious political force again without Scotland, so you’re setting up power for the next ten years.
    Not true, Labour would have won a majority in 1945, 1966, 1997, 2001 and 2005 in England alone.

    In 1950 and October 1974 Labour would have won most seats in England and Wales alone.

    Only in February 1974 would the Tories have won an election they lost UK wide had there been no Scottish seats and Heath would have been narrowly re elected
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831
    He can't possibly sign up to anything contentious while in Brussels, can he? This is just setting the scene for the most theatrical walkout.
  • I see this place is even crazier than usual...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,861
    edited December 2020

    Sorry but you're an absolute roaster.

    Anyone following the Madrid precedent is a fascist.

    The Catalonia precedent is the equivalent of if on June 23rd 2016 the EU also had a referendum on whether to let the UK leave, and they said no.
    It is also the EU's fault for having in its constitution Article 50 which enabled a member state to leave, the Spanish constitution has no such provisions, nor does the UK's constitution which is based on Westminster sovereignty.

    Even in Canada in 1995 after Quebec's second independence vote narrowly failed the Canadian Supreme Court after the vote ruled had Yes won Quebec independence would have been illegal without Canadian government approval anyway
  • I see this place is even crazier than usual...

    We do not agree on very much but on this you are spot on
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,336
    Gaussian said:

    He can't possibly sign up to anything contentious while in Brussels, can he? This is just setting the scene for the most theatrical walkout.

    I imagine they'd want to sign the deal in person. Or it could be as described, to try to unjam things.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,160
    HYUFD said:

    No it won't', the Tories will always get a third of the vote whatever happens, the only way they don't is if Farage's new party overtakes them because Boris does too soft a Brexit.

    Labour and the LDs are never going to overtake the Tories on the right, only Farage could do that as he did last Spring
    Good luck with no deal then.

    A third of the vote is guaranteed is it? Do you not recall 1997?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,318
    HYUFD said:

    Not true, Labour would have won a majority in 1945, 1966, 1997, 2001 and 2005 in England alone.

    In 1950 and October 1974 Labour would have won most seats in England and Wales alone.

    Only in February 1974 would the Tories have won an election they lost UK wide had there been no Scottish seats and Heath would have been narrowly re elected
    Assuming people would have voted the same way.

    You also forget that in Oct 74 and 1966 office and therefore the initiative in timing the election passed to Labour because of a Scotland inspired win (Feb 1974 and 1964, which you forgot, respectively). Without that, they might still have lost.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,617

    I see this place is even crazier than usual...

    It was nice and civilised earlier - we were discussing recipes for scrambled eggs, turnip soup and sheep's head. But a certain poster came back and got all aerated about the god-given divine right of the English to rule the Scots.
  • Pulpstar said:

    It'd suit the Democrats to have SCOTUS vitiate both the PA and the WI legislature, and thus have the Democrat governors run things for 2 years in those states.
    That's what they're suing for right ?
    I dont think they put much thought into what they are suing for, its all about volume and number of cases.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,413

    I see this place is even crazier than usual...

    Everyone's a little bit mad, bubbling under the surface.
  • RobD said:

    I imagine they'd want to sign the deal in person. Or it could be as described, to try to unjam things.
    https://twitter.com/nickgutteridge/status/1336020712285491201
  • Kenny Sansom diagnosed with dementia at just 62

    Sad news and just how long will heading be permitted in football without head protection at the very least
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,100

    Kenny Sansom diagnosed with dementia at just 62

    Sad news and just how long will heading be permitted in football without head protection at the very least

    Who?
  • We do not agree on very much but on this you are spot on
    I just spent 90 minutes on a software developers forum watching somebody argue that Agile combined with LISP (well,,, clojure) was the way forward.

    I thought that was mad, then I popped in here :D

    I think I will go and watch some Number Theory on YT
  • I see this place is even crazier than usual...

    What's unusual about HYUFD having General Franco fascist tendencies?
This discussion has been closed.