Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The polling that’s persuaded me that turnout will be greater t

124

Comments

  • I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226
    edited November 2019
    kinabalu said:

    For those of us who want to see a centre left labour party so when it eventually takes power it acts with maturity we need to see Labour pummeled into the ground. We want no wonk to think "lets nationalise telecoms" ever again.

    A big loss spells the end of the Corbyn project. I don't have a problem with this but I do want the party to retain a radical edge rather than go back to being the timid creature of 2015. Let's keep the goal of a serious attack on inequality but try to find a leader with more brains and less baggage. My sense is the country will soon tire of having an essentially comic figure as PM, so the next GE ought to be very winnable. In which case let's win it - but for a purpose, not just to hold the fort and tinker until the Tories' next stint.
    If Labour lose this election and replace Corbyn with a moderate like Keir Starmer they could yet recover. If however they elect another Corbynista like Burgon or Pidcock then the LDs will be real contenders to overtake them, Chuka looked quite prime ministerial this morning even if I disagreed with him talking about LD foreign policy and if he wins Cities of London and Westminster will be a contender to succeed Swinson as LD leader with a record of being able to squeeze the Labour vote in the LDs favour
  • MattW said:

    It's all happening in Ashfield.

    https://youtu.be/lT_vOokVOGM

    Oh dear. Though with all the blue lights behind, you can't help wondering if an even bigger story has been missed.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    Bit rude about BigG
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,853
    edited November 2019
    McDonnell's WASPI business has gone down like absolute cold sick amongst my colleagues this morning. It's going to utterly infuriate women born in the early 60s in particular.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,695
    Foxy said:

    kjh said:

    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    5% (+3%) of Leave voters back Jo Swinson as Best PM? WTF?
    But down three with current LibDem voters! lol. Even her own supporters are put off by her "Prime Minister" schtick.
    In a poll where your Bozo is down 4% and Swinson is up 1%. Desperate stuff, Mr Mark.

    I'd punt that 16% for the leader of the third UK party in response to "who would make the best PM" is historically extremely high.
    That's it, run along to her defence, like some little lap dog.

    Because she can't cut it without you yapping to protect her?
    I think you need a lie down.
    That Survation does seem to show Lab recovering a bit, but I do like the 2% of Tories backing Jezza as best PM!

    On pensions, I would suggest that pension age should be life expectancy minus 12 years.
    I like that idea. It is a bit of - I have some good news and some bad news!
    It is actually a serious proposal.

    Of course, men get to retire earlier :)
    I don't disagree on two counts a) it makes sense, b) I'm a man
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    Indeed.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/27/passenger-in-clown-suit-prompts-mass-brawl-on-po-cruise-ship
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    Pulpstar said:

    McDonald's WASPI business has gone down like absolute cold sick amongst my colleagues this morning.

    Yup, my friends were scathing yesterday at the pub, my colleagues even more so this morning. Especially the juniors and lower paid ones.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    kinabalu said:
    "A big loss spells the end of the Corbyn project. I don't have a problem with this but I do want the party to retain a radical edge rather than go back to being the timid creature of 2015. Let's keep the goal of a serious attack on inequality but try to find a leader with more brains and less baggage. My sense is the country will soon tire of having an essentially comic figure as PM, so the next GE ought to be very winnable. In which case let's win it - but for a purpose, not just to hold the fort and tinker until the Tories' next stint."

    Who do you want to be the next Labour Leader then?
    I`d be most happy with Cooper or Benn (maybe Kinnock).
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,695

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    I agree but for different reasons. I enjoy active holidays and I also enjoy my food.

    I would actually explode on a cruise.
  • IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    5% (+3%) of Leave voters back Jo Swinson as Best PM? WTF?
    But down three with current LibDem voters! lol. Even her own supporters are put off by her "Prime Minister" schtick.
    In a poll where your Bozo is down 4% and Swinson is up 1%. Desperate stuff, Mr Mark.

    I'd punt that 16% for the leader of the third UK party in response to "who would make the best PM" is historically extremely high.
    That's it, run along to her defence, like some little lap dog.

    Because she can't cut it without you yapping to protect her?
    I think you need a lie down.
    That Survation does seem to show Lab recovering a bit, but I do like the 2% of Tories backing Jezza as best PM!

    On pensions, I would suggest that pension age should be life expectancy minus 12 years.
    For one in 47 Boris-backing Tories to sit down and watch him debate with Corbyn and come away thinking that Corbyn would make the better PM is indeed remarkable.
    1 or 2% will agree to almost anything in a poll because they didn’t read the question or are trolling .

    I once told a phone poller that I didn’t have a phone line...
    To be fair what was that even a question on a phone poll?
    I strongly suspected the whole thing was a scam. The question was about my mobile phone line and I got a bit carried away...
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    edited November 2019

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    When people get older they seem to purchase / collect the things they couldn't afford when they were wrong.

    Mrs Eek found a late 50's / early 60's jigsaw of a cruise ship at the weekend - it explains everything.

    Equally sat in Barbados back in September there was an afternoon of heavy rain. While sat in the lounge talking to various people someone said this is what a cruise ship is like but without the ability to escape
  • kjh said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    I agree but for different reasons. I enjoy active holidays and I also enjoy my food.

    I would actually explode on a cruise.
    That too.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    Casino_Royale said:

    "I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising"

    Ha ha. I`m with you - but worth saying that there are cruises and cruises.

    A small-vessel wildlife cruise to the Arctic is not in the same taste ballpark as a package cruise in the Med for example.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
  • olmolm Posts: 125
    edited November 2019
    Poor manoeuvring by Blair - not objective-lead; if Blair truly wished for a hung-parliament, and was being objective, he would have kept out of the fray - his intervention is likely to only harm Lab and not Cons, and only decreases the change of what he says he seeks (a hung parliament).
  • IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    5% (+3%) of Leave voters back Jo Swinson as Best PM? WTF?
    But down three with current LibDem voters! lol. Even her own supporters are put off by her "Prime Minister" schtick.
    In a poll where your Bozo is down 4% and Swinson is up 1%. Desperate stuff, Mr Mark.

    I'd punt that 16% for the leader of the third UK party in response to "who would make the best PM" is historically extremely high.
    That's it, run along to her defence, like some little lap dog.

    Because she can't cut it without you yapping to protect her?
    I think you need a lie down.
    That Survation does seem to show Lab recovering a bit, but I do like the 2% of Tories backing Jezza as best PM!

    On pensions, I would suggest that pension age should be life expectancy minus 12 years.
    For one in 47 Boris-backing Tories to sit down and watch him debate with Corbyn and come away thinking that Corbyn would make the better PM is indeed remarkable.
    1 or 2% will agree to almost anything in a poll because they didn’t read the question or are trolling .

    I once told a phone poller that I didn’t have a phone line...
    To be fair what was that even a question on a phone poll?
    I strongly suspected the whole thing was a scam. The question was about my mobile phone line and I got a bit carried away...
    I do think that there is a proportion of poll replies that are given for 'shits and giggles' or to get through the questions to the end of the poll and that people afterwards overanalaysing the responses don't realise the people giving the answers may not have been entirely serious or considered in their replies.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    HYUFD said: "Bit rude about BigG"

    To be fair, if I recall correctly BigG went on a cruise to Alaska, which may be within the bounds of acceptability?
  • Anorak said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
    And were locked in when icebergs were hit.
  • camelcamel Posts: 815
    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    For those of us who want to see a centre left labour party so when it eventually takes power it acts with maturity we need to see Labour pummeled into the ground. We want no wonk to think "lets nationalise telecoms" ever again.

    A big loss spells the end of the Corbyn project. I don't have a problem with this but I do want the party to retain a radical edge rather than go back to being the timid creature of 2015. Let's keep the goal of a serious attack on inequality but try to find a leader with more brains and less baggage. My sense is the country will soon tire of having an essentially comic figure as PM, so the next GE ought to be very winnable. In which case let's win it - but for a purpose, not just to hold the fort and tinker until the Tories' next stint.
    If Labour lose this election and replace Corbyn with a moderate like Keir Starmer they could yet recover. If however they elect another Corbynista like Burgon or Pidcock then the LDs will be real contenders to overtake them, Chuka looked quite prime ministerial this morning even if I disagreed with him talking about LD foreign policy and if he wins Cities of London and Westminster will be a contender to succeed Swinson as LD leader with a record of being able to squeeze the Labour vote in the LDs favour
    I like Chukka. He has star quality, not least, like Boris, forename recognition which is not to be underestimated.

    I've always considered him to be quite thin skinned - maybe a vanity thing - but he seems quite comfortable in his own skin recently. Much less easy to provoke.

    I think he's always been a LibDem at heart. I win if the tories hold Cities constituency, but it will feel hollow.
  • Gabs3Gabs3 Posts: 836

    Anorak said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
    And were locked in when icebergs were hit.
    No they weren't. Probably best not to get your history from Hollywood movies.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226
    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621

    Anorak said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
    And were locked in when icebergs were hit.
    They did get to shag in the back of other people's motor cars though, so not all bad.
  • olm said:

    Poor manoeuvring by Blair - not objective-lead; if Blair truly wished for a hung-parliament, and was being objective, he would have kept out of the fray - his intervention is likely to only harm Lab and not Cons, and only decreases the change of what he says he seeks (a hung parliament).

    Given that a strong Tory majority would probably see the end of Corbyn I’m not sure he would be that heartbroken.
  • camel said:

    camel said:

    Mr. Camel, I've backed that too.

    The 'dad bet' stuff reminds me of when mine wanted me to put money on him for a Grand National horse. I slung a little on for myself too, as I'd be annoyed if it won and I made nothing on it.

    Damned thing won the race.

    Family betting in Yorkshire:

    If your brother Judd tells you to put the bet on, then put the bet on.
    Kes? It is somehow telling that our national coming of age novel so depressingly confirms we cannot escape our destiny. As West Ham fans like David Cameron know, however high our bubbles float, then, like my dreams, they fade and die.
    Indeed.

    For fans and nostalgics, there's a gentle documentary on iplayer called Greg Davies: Looking for Kes.

    Turns out the actor playing Billy Casper has not changed at all in 51 years.

    Downloaded for later. Though from what I remember of the film, it is depressing but with two funny scenes. Penalty!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226
    camel said:

    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    For those of us who want to see a centre left labour party so when it eventually takes power it acts with maturity we need to see Labour pummeled into the ground. We want no wonk to think "lets nationalise telecoms" ever again.

    A big loss spells the end of the Corbyn project. I don't have a problem with this but I do want the party to retain a radical edge rather than go back to being the timid creature of 2015. Let's keep the goal of a serious attack on inequality but try to find a leader with more brains and less baggage. My sense is the country will soon tire of having an essentially comic figure as PM, so the next GE ought to be very winnable. In which case let's win it - but for a purpose, not just to hold the fort and tinker until the Tories' next stint.
    If Labour lose this election and replace Corbyn with a moderate like Keir Starmer they could yet recover. If however they elect another Corbynista like Burgon or Pidcock then the LDs will be real contenders to overtake them, Chuka looked quite prime ministerial this morning even if I disagreed with him talking about LD foreign policy and if he wins Cities of London and Westminster will be a contender to succeed Swinson as LD leader with a record of being able to squeeze the Labour vote in the LDs favour
    I like Chukka. He has star quality, not least, like Boris, forename recognition which is not to be underestimated.

    I've always considered him to be quite thin skinned - maybe a vanity thing - but he seems quite comfortable in his own skin recently. Much less easy to provoke.

    I think he's always been a LibDem at heart. I win if the tories hold Cities constituency, but it will feel hollow.
    Chuka is the biggest star on the centre left at the moment as Boris is on the right
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344
    olm said:

    Poor manoeuvring by Blair - not objective-lead; if Blair truly wished for a hung-parliament, and was being objective, he would have kept out of the fray - his intervention is likely to only harm Lab and not Cons, and only decreases the change of what he says he seeks (a hung parliament).

    On the other hand, he'll take a Boris Govt. and a crushed Corbyn, retiring from the fray.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Stocky said:

    HYUFD said: "Bit rude about BigG"

    To be fair, if I recall correctly BigG went on a cruise to Alaska, which may be within the bounds of acceptability?

    Not great for Alaska. The destructive effect of cruise ships on pretty much any environment is massive.
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Will that help or harm IDS?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    YouGov MRP apparently out on Wed.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    edited November 2019
    IshmaelZ said:

    Stocky said:

    HYUFD said: "Bit rude about BigG"

    To be fair, if I recall correctly BigG went on a cruise to Alaska, which may be within the bounds of acceptability?

    Not great for Alaska. The destructive effect of cruise ships on pretty much any environment is massive.
    A disgrace they still (mostly) use HFO in this day and age. Vile, vile stuff.

    This is what it looks like. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_fuel_oil#/media/File:Residual_fuel_oil.JPG
  • MaxPB said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    Indeed.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/27/passenger-in-clown-suit-prompts-mass-brawl-on-po-cruise-ship
    Were they from Birmingham? :lol:
  • camelcamel Posts: 815
    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,789
    geoffw said:

    The all-knowing state not much self-aware. Do they have opinion polls in China?
    @geoffw: It's a one-party state so I assume not.

    In one of the RSS Conferences (2018?) I was explaining the concept of opinion polling to a staggeringly nice, extremely polite Chinese statistician. She was one of those people who are so polite they never disagree with you or ask you to explain things they don't understand. I was halfway thru my spiel when her increasingly fixed smile and nervous laughter finally percolated thru my thick skull: I was describing concepts that simply don't exist in her homeland. It was a very sobering conversation.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    HYUFD said:

    If Labour lose this election and replace Corbyn with a moderate like Keir Starmer they could yet recover. If however they elect another Corbynista like Burgon or Pidcock then the LDs will be real contenders to overtake them, Chuka looked quite prime ministerial this morning even if I disagreed with him talking about LD foreign policy and if he wins Cities of London and Westminster will be a contender to succeed Swinson as LD leader with a record of being able to squeeze the Labour vote in the LDs favour

    The space between a Starmer and a continuity Corbyn is IMO big enough to settle down and raise a family. As to who, I don't know. Let's see what the choice is when it all kicks off next year.
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is he on his bike?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 22,700
    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    HYUFD said:
    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    What`s the issue in Chingford and Woodford Green? I`ve looked at the stats - and no BXP to contend with - 50% voted leave - I`d have this as a safe Tory seat?? Maybe even value at 4/11.
  • MattW said:

    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
    Wouldn't be a hindrance in Tory or Labour party leadership elections!
  • camelcamel Posts: 815
    MattW said:

    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
    Camels are drawn towards feisty types.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226
    edited November 2019
    Stocky said:

    HYUFD said:
    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    What`s the issue in Chingford and Woodford Green? I`ve looked at the stats - and no BXP to contend with - 50% voted leave - I`d have this as a safe Tory seat?? Maybe even value at 4/11.

    Momentum are flooding the seat, so shoring up the Tories vote.

    Getting quite aggressive

    https://twitter.com/montie/status/1198917221738844160?s=20
  • Pulpstar said:

    McDonnell's WASPI business has gone down like absolute cold sick amongst my colleagues this morning. It's going to utterly infuriate women born in the early 60s in particular.

    Swinson had this right. This issue is currently with the Ombudsman. Why make a premature move before that report unless you are looking for a cheap gesture 18 days to go.
  • Stocky said:

    kinabalu said:
    "A big loss spells the end of the Corbyn project. I don't have a problem with this but I do want the party to retain a radical edge rather than go back to being the timid creature of 2015. Let's keep the goal of a serious attack on inequality but try to find a leader with more brains and less baggage. My sense is the country will soon tire of having an essentially comic figure as PM, so the next GE ought to be very winnable. In which case let's win it - but for a purpose, not just to hold the fort and tinker until the Tories' next stint."

    Who do you want to be the next Labour Leader then?
    I`d be most happy with Cooper or Benn (maybe Kinnock).

    Anyone but Kinnock!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226

    HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is he on his bike?
    I doubt it from Saffron Walden
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    camel said:

    MattW said:

    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
    Camels are drawn towards feisty types.
    There's a joke about humps in there somewhere, but I'm frankly too hungry to bother :)
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited November 2019
    Pulpstar said:

    McDonnell's WASPI business has gone down like absolute cold sick amongst my colleagues this morning. It's going to utterly infuriate women born in the early 60s in particular.

    It's a completely bonkers policy. Quite apart from the fact that it is men, not women, who have been unfairly discriminated against on retirement age, it is a mind-blowingly expensive bung. Forking out £58bn to a group who weren't discriminated against in any way means not spending £58bn on other things - that is more than enough to fund adult social care generously for several years, for example,

    Of course it is just McDonnell cynically trying to bribe these voters, but it's such an absurd and incredible bribe that it will be counterproductive.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226

    HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    The Tories vote there is generally pro Leave, the remainder are anti Corbyn
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    edited November 2019
    Stocky said:

    Who do you want to be the next Labour Leader then?
    I`d be most happy with Cooper or Benn (maybe Kinnock).

    Not sure yet. I really like Pidcock but she might be too left wing and also too young. RLB lacks charisma for me. Prefer Rayner to her, but not by a lot. Phillips I'm not a big fan of, although I know many are. Cooper, I would support, providing she shows some interest in ideology. I voted for her in 2015. Or did I? Yes, I think I did. Benn, no. Starmer, no. Kinnock, no. Pale, male, stale.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226

    HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Will that help or harm IDS?
    Help him with his core vote
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,226
    edited November 2019
    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1198921005953175552?s=20

    He gets his dad who does not even live there
  • Anorak said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
    Well, quite.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    MikeSmithson said: "Swinson had this right. This issue is currently with the Ombudsman. Why make a premature move before that report unless you are looking for a cheap gesture 18 days to go."

    I agree Mike - but Labour are desperate. If they can pick up this sizeable cohort of voters then this may be the difference between defeat and embarrassing defeat which may save Corbyn his job.
  • Stocky said:

    HYUFD said: "Bit rude about BigG"

    To be fair, if I recall correctly BigG went on a cruise to Alaska, which may be within the bounds of acceptability?

    I have been on cruises to Alaska, Japan and China, Antarctica, The Arctic, Scandinavia and Svalbard, Iceland and Greenland, east and west Mediterranean, Transatlantic to Nova Scotia, New England and New York just to name a few.

    However, they have all been because my wife and I love being on ships and at sea and exploring new places. None of them have been Disney themed or other children friendly cruises
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,946
    Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    It would be amusing if, following Roger's emigration, Le Pen won next time.
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    IDS losing his seat would be as hilarious as Bozo, Rees-Mogg or Corbyn losing theirs. All four would be just toooo much!

    Perhaps their should be a poll for the person voters would most like to lose their seat
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Anorak said:

    I can’t think of anything so expensive I’d enjoy less than cruising, by the way.

    The types of people you get on cruise ships these days are utterly ghastly.

    "these days"

    I the olden days, I suppose the riff-raff was consigned to steerage.
    It didn't go on cruises at all. The Titanic was not a cruise ship.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,344
    camel said:

    MattW said:

    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
    Camels are drawn towards feisty types.
    No spitting, please.....
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    At least Gauke can pick up his tax-free severence pay (which he would have lost entitlement to if he`d decided not to stand).
  • kinabalu said:

    Stocky said:

    Who do you want to be the next Labour Leader then?
    I`d be most happy with Cooper or Benn (maybe Kinnock).

    Not sure yet. I really like Pidcock but she might be too left wing and also too young. RLB lacks charisma for me. Prefer Rayner to her, but not by a lot. Phillips I'm not a big fan of, although I know many are. Cooper, I would support, providing she shows some interest in ideology. I voted for her in 2015. Or did I? Yes, I think I did. Benn, no. Starmer, no. Kinnock, no. Pale, male, stale.
    The tiresome repetition of bigoted cliches like "Pale, male, stale" won't do you much good in a world where such people actually exist and vote. See 'deplorables' for further information.
  • Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    Johnson is a populist who would stoop to anything to feed his sad ego. It is similar to being a fascist.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    Big-G said: "I have been on cruises to Alaska, Japan and China, Antarctica, The Arctic, Scandinavia and Svalbard, Iceland and Greenland, east and west Mediterranean, Transatlantic to Nova Scotia, New England and New York just to name a few.

    However, they have all been because my wife and I love being on ships and at sea and exploring new places. None of them have been Disney themed or other children friendly cruises"


    I knew we`d flush you out!
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    IDS losing his seat would be as hilarious as Bozo, Rees-Mogg or Corbyn losing theirs. All four would be just toooo much!

    Perhaps their should be a poll for the person voters would most like to lose their seat
    Any one of these (or even all of them):

    JRM
    IDS
    Raab
    Swinson
    Pidcock
  • ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,843
    Anyone hoping Labour loses badly enough to end the Corbyn project is likely to be disappointed. While the tories do genuinely seem to be on course for a majority at this point, hard to see them getting more than 350 or so seats. Labour is almost certainly going to remain above 200. LDs will likely be squeezed on the day as many waverers confront the stark choice before them, Corbyn or Johnson and vote against the one they dislike the most. Labour would remain comfortably the largest opposition party, and survive a wipe out. The party is already under control of the momentum left, who will never willingly cede control, and much of the moderate membership has long since left it.

    At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left. No way will they go for Starmer or Yvette Cooper etc.
  • kinabalu said:

    Stocky said:

    Who do you want to be the next Labour Leader then?
    I`d be most happy with Cooper or Benn (maybe Kinnock).

    Not sure yet. I really like Pidcock but she might be too left wing and also too young. RLB lacks charisma for me. Prefer Rayner to her, but not by a lot. Phillips I'm not a big fan of, although I know many are. Cooper, I would support, providing she shows some interest in ideology. I voted for her in 2015. Or did I? Yes, I think I did. Benn, no. Starmer, no. Kinnock, no. Pale, male, stale.
    Laura Pillock? Eh gads!

    Becky Bibbly-Bobbly has NO charisma, at least Rayner and Phillips do. Cooper has very little.

    Benn and Starmer are smart, Kinnock is thicker than his Dad
  • Stocky said:

    HYUFD said:
    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    What`s the issue in Chingford and Woodford Green? I`ve looked at the stats - and no BXP to contend with - 50% voted leave - I`d have this as a safe Tory seat?? Maybe even value at 4/11.

    I think the demographics are shifting away from the Tories, like a lot of outer London/ inner home counties seats (ie more of the kind of people whose cricketing loyalties the previous MP might have questioned). Labour have a pretty strong candidate there too I believe. My model predicts a reasonably safe Tory hold but it doesn't control for demographics.
    The MRP poll might be insightful for this kind of seat I would guess. If Labour are doing really badly in seats with lots of 'traditional Labour voters' in and the national polls are right then they must be doing better somewhere else - perhaps it is in places like this?
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683

    HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    IDS losing his seat would be as hilarious as Bozo, Rees-Mogg or Corbyn losing theirs. All four would be just toooo much!

    Perhaps their should be a poll for the person voters would most like to lose their seat
    Any one of these (or even all of them):

    JRM
    IDS
    Raab
    Swinson
    Pidcock
    Dame Margaret Beckett - for her role in Corbyn's election.
  • HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    IDS losing his seat would be as hilarious as Bozo, Rees-Mogg or Corbyn losing theirs. All four would be just toooo much!

    Perhaps their should be a poll for the person voters would most like to lose their seat
    Any one of these (or even all of them):

    JRM
    IDS
    Raab
    Swinson
    Pidcock
    Raab would definitely be good.
  • Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    Johnson is a populist who would stoop to anything to feed his sad ego. It is similar to being a fascist.

    HYUFD said:

    Lord Tebbit joining IDS on the campaign trail in his old seat of Chingford and Woodford Green tomorrow

    Is that wise? Surely IDS should be acting as woke as possible - denouncing Brexit and advocating transgender rights for example - if he wants to save his seat in the face of a changing demographic.
    IDS losing his seat would be as hilarious as Bozo, Rees-Mogg or Corbyn losing theirs. All four would be just toooo much!

    Perhaps their should be a poll for the person voters would most like to lose their seat
    I think that before you try learning what a fascist actually is, you need to spend some time with a grammar Nazi.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    AramintaMoonbeamQC said:

    "Any one of these (or even all of them):

    JRM
    IDS
    Raab
    Swinson
    Pidcock"


    You`ve covered all three major parties there. You a Brexit Party supporter?
  • Gabs3Gabs3 Posts: 836

    Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    Johnson is a populist who would stoop to anything to feed his sad ego. It is similar to being a fascist.
    That makes no sense. Fascism is a clearly defined ideology.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,853
    Remember the welsh polling was the coalmine in the canary last time that it was all unravelling for May..
  • Anyone hoping Labour loses badly enough to end the Corbyn project is likely to be disappointed. While the tories do genuinely seem to be on course for a majority at this point, hard to see them getting more than 350 or so seats. Labour is almost certainly going to remain above 200. LDs will likely be squeezed on the day as many waverers confront the stark choice before them, Corbyn or Johnson and vote against the one they dislike the most. Labour would remain comfortably the largest opposition party, and survive a wipe out. The party is already under control of the momentum left, who will never willingly cede control, and much of the moderate membership has long since left it.

    At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left. No way will they go for Starmer or Yvette Cooper etc.

    Labour strategists have made a massive mistake imho. They have written the manifesto that they dreamed of presenting all their lives: rammed full of radical stuff and huge sweeping changes to the economy.

    But.

    This was the wrong election to do it. This is the Brexit election. Labour left would have been better to hold their fire until the next election comes, when it is at least possible that voting for change will be the driver.

    As it stands, polling wise, it looks like the country will reject this manifesto out of hand. And then RBL or Pidcock or whoever has a problem next time around.
  • Pulpstar said:

    Remember the welsh polling was the coalmine in the canary last time that it was all unravelling for May..

    Thanks. As if we didn’t need more stress!
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    Paristonda said:
    "At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left."

    Can get 16/1 now on Thornberry (with Betfair). At one stage she was 4/1 favourite I think.
  • Gabs3Gabs3 Posts: 836

    Anyone hoping Labour loses badly enough to end the Corbyn project is likely to be disappointed. While the tories do genuinely seem to be on course for a majority at this point, hard to see them getting more than 350 or so seats. Labour is almost certainly going to remain above 200. LDs will likely be squeezed on the day as many waverers confront the stark choice before them, Corbyn or Johnson and vote against the one they dislike the most. Labour would remain comfortably the largest opposition party, and survive a wipe out. The party is already under control of the momentum left, who will never willingly cede control, and much of the moderate membership has long since left it.

    At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left. No way will they go for Starmer or Yvette Cooper etc.

    Labour strategists have made a massive mistake imho. They have written the manifesto that they dreamed of presenting all their lives: rammed full of radical stuff and huge sweeping changes to the economy.

    But.

    This was the wrong election to do it. This is the Brexit election. Labour left would have been better to hold their fire until the next election comes, when it is at least possible that voting for change will be the driver.

    As it stands, polling wise, it looks like the country will reject this manifesto out of hand. And then RBL or Pidcock or whoever has a problem next time around.
    I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,789

    Stocky said:

    HYUFD said: "Bit rude about BigG"

    To be fair, if I recall correctly BigG went on a cruise to Alaska, which may be within the bounds of acceptability?

    I have been on cruises to Alaska, Japan and China, Antarctica, The Arctic, Scandinavia and Svalbard, Iceland and Greenland, east and west Mediterranean, Transatlantic to Nova Scotia, New England and New York just to name a few.

    However, they have all been because my wife and I love being on ships and at sea and exploring new places....
    Or you could be an international spy. Suddenly it all makes sense... :)
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,789
    Gabs3 said:

    Anyone hoping Labour loses badly enough to end the Corbyn project is likely to be disappointed. While the tories do genuinely seem to be on course for a majority at this point, hard to see them getting more than 350 or so seats. Labour is almost certainly going to remain above 200. LDs will likely be squeezed on the day as many waverers confront the stark choice before them, Corbyn or Johnson and vote against the one they dislike the most. Labour would remain comfortably the largest opposition party, and survive a wipe out. The party is already under control of the momentum left, who will never willingly cede control, and much of the moderate membership has long since left it.

    At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left. No way will they go for Starmer or Yvette Cooper etc.

    Labour strategists have made a massive mistake imho. They have written the manifesto that they dreamed of presenting all their lives: rammed full of radical stuff and huge sweeping changes to the economy.

    But.

    This was the wrong election to do it. This is the Brexit election. Labour left would have been better to hold their fire until the next election comes, when it is at least possible that voting for change will be the driver.

    As it stands, polling wise, it looks like the country will reject this manifesto out of hand. And then RBL or Pidcock or whoever has a problem next time around.
    I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening.
    "British Prime Minister Boris Johnson". We are already in the alternate timeline... :(
  • Fishing said:

    Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    It would be amusing if, following Roger's emigration, Le Pen won next time.
    Roger is such an extremist himself he'd probably consider France under Le Pen in the EU to be less concerning than Britain under a One Nation Conservative like Boris out of it.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,456

    2015: The polls over-stated Labour

    2017: The polls under-stated Labour

    2019: ?

    Sunil, my guess is that the higher the turnout, the more incorrect the weightings used by pollsters to adjust for voter intention will be. So if they are correcting to increase the Tory score now from the raw data, then they will be overstating the Tories (and vice versa). Same for Lab and LDs.

    Normally, my gut instinct would be then that the higher the turnout the more it would help Labour. But if the old Labour vote is split between Lab, LD and TBP, it may not be enough to change the results at a constituency level in all but a few seats.
  • Following the Waspie improvisation if the dial doesn't move much then I confidently expect McDonell to roll out the following, in this order, until it does:

    1. Cancel all student loans and return all payments with interest.
    2. Restore all "cuts" in welfare made over last decade with interest.
    3. Free TV licences for all, paid for from contingency fund.
    5. Repay all prescription charges made in last decade (with interest).

    If that lot don't work then it will be...
  • Stocky said:

    AramintaMoonbeamQC said:

    "Any one of these (or even all of them):

    JRM
    IDS
    Raab
    Swinson
    Pidcock"


    You`ve covered all three major parties there. You a Brexit Party supporter?

    No, they don't have any MPs to lose their seats. I didn't include the SDP for similar reasons.

    I'm in Scotland - for balance, I would have included John Mason MSP if this was a Holyrood election. I'm also not keen on Stewart McDonald (Glasgow South MP), but he's hardly a big name.

    Oh, and from NI, I'd love to see Emma Little-Pengelly and Sammy Wilson get punted.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    There is definitely something going on with the Majority betting market.
    1.41 Tory majority is the shortest I've seen it for years (correct me if I'm wrong!), Perhaps it is natural movement but more likely there are some polls out there we don't know about yet.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    camel said:

    MattW said:

    camel said:

    Lovely Layla on the TV. Should have been leader.

    I imagine, being a LibDem, that she makes her own hummus. I imagine her levantine heritage would mean her hummus is fantastic.

    Yes, lovely, lovely Layla.

    Am off for a lie down now.

    I think assaulting your boyfriend in the middle of a Lib Dem conference, them all hushing it up for a few years, than calling it half his fault tends to be a bit of a hindrance to that ambition!
    Camels are drawn towards feisty types.
    Perhaps you could take a job running her IT support ?

    It was a faulty cable -- rather than a faulty Cable -- that provoked her into the slap.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,753

    Pulpstar said:

    McDonnell's WASPI business has gone down like absolute cold sick amongst my colleagues this morning. It's going to utterly infuriate women born in the early 60s in particular.

    Of course it is just McDonnell cynically trying to bribe these voters, but it's such an absurd and incredible bribe that it will be counterproductive might just work.
    ftfy...you never know...
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947

    The tiresome repetition of bigoted cliches like "Pale, male, stale" won't do you much good in a world where such people actually exist and vote. See 'deplorables' for further information.

    OK. But we need a female leader for Labour, we really do, thus not 'male', and I personally do not want to lurch all the way back to timid centrism, that would be the 'stale'. Then I added in the 'pale' for no particular reason except to use the phrase. Which was wrong of me. Happy to amend to 'male and stale' only without the 'pale'.

    Deplorables? That was not a bigoted cliche. That was a politician daring to "tell it like it is" and getting punished for it.
  • Gabs3 said:

    Anyone hoping Labour loses badly enough to end the Corbyn project is likely to be disappointed. While the tories do genuinely seem to be on course for a majority at this point, hard to see them getting more than 350 or so seats. Labour is almost certainly going to remain above 200. LDs will likely be squeezed on the day as many waverers confront the stark choice before them, Corbyn or Johnson and vote against the one they dislike the most. Labour would remain comfortably the largest opposition party, and survive a wipe out. The party is already under control of the momentum left, who will never willingly cede control, and much of the moderate membership has long since left it.

    At best maybe Thornberry could get in, Corbyn aligned but not really hard left. No way will they go for Starmer or Yvette Cooper etc.

    Labour strategists have made a massive mistake imho. They have written the manifesto that they dreamed of presenting all their lives: rammed full of radical stuff and huge sweeping changes to the economy.

    But.

    This was the wrong election to do it. This is the Brexit election. Labour left would have been better to hold their fire until the next election comes, when it is at least possible that voting for change will be the driver.

    As it stands, polling wise, it looks like the country will reject this manifesto out of hand. And then RBL or Pidcock or whoever has a problem next time around.
    I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening.
    Would be hilarious to see her lose her seat at the election, if only for @Gallowgate 's reaction at seeing County Durham constituencies turning blue!
  • Brom said:

    There is definitely something going on with the Majority betting market.
    1.41 Tory majority is the shortest I've seen it for years (correct me if I'm wrong!), Perhaps it is natural movement but more likely there are some polls out there we don't know about yet.

    It's also passage of time. A 10 point lead on the eve of polling day provides far more confidence than one 6 weeks or 6 months out. As the clock ticks down to polling day, the time available for a game-changer reduces. As long as the Tory lead remains quite large and stable, you'll see them drift in further - doesn't necessarily imply any punters have access to unpublished information.
  • Fishing said:

    Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    It would be amusing if, following Roger's emigration, Le Pen won next time.
    Roger is such an extremist himself he'd probably consider France under Le Pen in the EU to be less concerning than Britain under a One Nation Conservative like Boris out of it.
    "a One Nation Conservative like Boris"
    I think you're a little out of date.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited November 2019
    kinabalu said:

    The tiresome repetition of bigoted cliches like "Pale, male, stale" won't do you much good in a world where such people actually exist and vote. See 'deplorables' for further information.

    OK. But we need a female leader for Labour, we really do, thus not 'male', and I personally do not want to lurch all the way back to timid centrism, that would be the 'stale'. Then I added in the 'pale' for no particular reason except to use the phrase. Which was wrong of me. Happy to amend to 'male and stale' only without the 'pale'.

    Deplorables? That was not a bigoted cliche. That was a politician daring to "tell it like it is" and getting punished for it.
    Its not how it is. A quarter of Americans are not deplorable.

    Trump is. But not a quarter of Americans.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113
    Gabs3 said:

    "I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening."

    Philip_Thompson said:

    "Would be hilarious to see her lose her seat at the election, if only for @Gallowgate 's reaction at seeing County Durham constituencies turning blue!"


    Be careful what you wish for. Pidcock leading the Labour Party would be great news for you Tories.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    Brom said:

    There is definitely something going on with the Majority betting market.
    1.41 Tory majority is the shortest I've seen it for years (correct me if I'm wrong!), Perhaps it is natural movement but more likely there are some polls out there we don't know about yet.

    It's also passage of time. A 10 point lead on the eve of polling day provides far more confidence than one 6 weeks or 6 months out. As the clock ticks down to polling day, the time available for a game-changer reduces. As long as the Tory lead remains quite large and stable, you'll see them drift in further - doesn't necessarily imply any punters have access to unpublished information.
    I do agree with this, but it's moved in from 1.46 overnight which i think is a greater movement than we've seen on any day since BXP stood aside, so assumed there was a bit more to it. Maybe not though!
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,151
    edited November 2019
    HYUFD said:
    Looks like cross over is imminent there. :D
  • MangoMango Posts: 1,017
    kyf_100 said:


    To be fair, the original post was quite odious. Describing our government as "quasi fascist" when it has in fact called an election when the opposition spent some considerable time trying to stop it - and prevent the referendum result from being implemented - is deeply disingenuous and does a disservice to all those who have actually suffered at the hands of fascism.

    Quite. The slow drip of othering, the appeal to emotion over evidence, the willingness to dogwhistle and to accept the support of extremists, the references to "will of the people" particularly when trashing constitutional arrangements, the willingness to work with Bannon and his network all mean that this government is proto-fascist, not quasi-fascist.

    Honouring the victims of fascism includes remembering how it comes about.
  • Fishing said:

    Charles said:

    Roger said:

    Prepare for the most ugly result of an election ever beating 1983 by a whisker. Fortunately I have the means to take myself to France and providing Johnson's quasi fascist government doesn't impliment stuff that brings a reciprocal response from the French I can become a happy ex pat.

    For those who are forced to live under this clown they have at least one thing to look forward to. No more Corbyn. One of the five people most responsible for this very British farce

    Sarkozy was a quasi fascist.

    Johnson is not.
    It would be amusing if, following Roger's emigration, Le Pen won next time.
    Roger is such an extremist himself he'd probably consider France under Le Pen in the EU to be less concerning than Britain under a One Nation Conservative like Boris out of it.
    "a One Nation Conservative like Boris"
    I think you're a little out of date.
    How is Boris anything but One Nation?

    As much a small group of Europhiles in the last Parliament tried to co-opt the term One Nation to mean Europhile. One Nation ≠ Europhile.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,037
    Just think, in 2 weeks 4 days social media will be awash with those tedious posts about taking a pen to the polling station to see off the great establishment pencil vote changing scam
  • camelcamel Posts: 815
    Stocky said:

    Gabs3 said:

    "I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening."

    Philip_Thompson said:

    "Would be hilarious to see her lose her seat at the election, if only for @Gallowgate 's reaction at seeing County Durham constituencies turning blue!"


    Be careful what you wish for. Pidcock leading the Labour Party would be great news for you Tories.

    Piddy is in my top five media performers of this election. She's sparky.

    The others are lovely Layla, Chukka, Rishi Sunak and Sal Brinton. So something for everyone there.
  • Stocky said:

    Gabs3 said:

    "I still can't see the phrase "British Prime Minister Laura Pidcock" ever happening."

    Philip_Thompson said:

    "Would be hilarious to see her lose her seat at the election, if only for @Gallowgate 's reaction at seeing County Durham constituencies turning blue!"


    Be careful what you wish for. Pidcock leading the Labour Party would be great news for you Tories.

    After 2017 the joke of extremists running Labour has worn thin. I wish for a sane opposition that I would not be petrified of them winning the election if we lose.
This discussion has been closed.