politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If this polling turns out to be accurate then it is great news
Comments
-
Labour are about to test that theory to destruction in the 25-34 age range unless they u-turn on the £58bn. I haven't seen my non-politically inclined friends this annoyed by a single policy in a very long time. Until now they just thought Corbyn was a joke with his free broadband and oddball ideas, now they think he's going to tax all of them to pay for older wealthy women who want to retire early.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Always interesting at how much more the young voter is pro Labour than the male one.PeterMannion said:
Might we see the biggest gender divide this election?RobD said:
£15,380 average, £31,300 maximum. A huge bung.Benpointer said:
Wow thanks for that insight!geoffw said:
Number of women affected times the average amount of compensation.Benpointer said:
Are there some workings behind the £58bn?BluerBlue said:
Will the question include the information that it will cost the public an extra £58 billion in uncosted borrowing and / or taxes? Because that seems like a relevant piece of context, no?nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
I was rather wondering if anyone has the stats on numbers impacted and avereage amount per person.
https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-2019-labours-58bn-pledge-to-right-waspi-injustice-118690051 -
Well, 33.3% of the time, maybe.timmo said:
If they get a decent majority why would they do that? It's a guaranteed 5 yearspartypoliticalorphan said:Scanned the Conservative manifesto. Lots of wriggle room in most of it but emphatic that they will scrap the Fixed Term Parliament Act. That should get a lot of thumbs ups on here.
The average parliamentary term prior to the FTPA was far closer to five years than it has been since the Act was introduced...0 -
I would assume it's correct, I saw it quoted in the NY Times. The gap has closed by 3 points I believe, from 14 to 11pp. The former always seemed a little high from Survation. Full tables normally seem to be available on Mondays, I expect to update my model tomorrow.nico67 said:
It seems to have been pulled from Britain Elects . Could it be a fake poll or is it correct but just leaked . Do we have confirmation yet.CorrectHorseBattery said:
One was leaked today, Labour closing the gap by one point, to 30, Tories on 41Benpointer said:
Aren't we due another Survation poll or have I missed one this weekend?CorrectHorseBattery said:
He's an interesting one to watch for sure. He seems quite cynical about the polls in general, probably because of how much he was ridiculed last time.nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
1 -
I think most of that range as so solidly Labour they won't be going anywhere, which is why they feel able to make such an unfair policy in the first place.MaxPB said:
Labour are about to test that theory to destruction in the 25-34 age range unless they u-turn on the £58bn. I haven't seen my non-politically inclined friends this annoyed by a single policy in a very long time. Until now they just thought Corbyn was a joke with his free broadband and oddball ideas, now they think he's going to tax all of them to pay for older wealthy women who want to retire early.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Always interesting at how much more the young voter is pro Labour than the male one.PeterMannion said:
Might we see the biggest gender divide this election?RobD said:
£15,380 average, £31,300 maximum. A huge bung.Benpointer said:
Wow thanks for that insight!geoffw said:
Number of women affected times the average amount of compensation.Benpointer said:
Are there some workings behind the £58bn?BluerBlue said:
Will the question include the information that it will cost the public an extra £58 billion in uncosted borrowing and / or taxes? Because that seems like a relevant piece of context, no?nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
I was rather wondering if anyone has the stats on numbers impacted and avereage amount per person.
https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-2019-labours-58bn-pledge-to-right-waspi-injustice-118690050 -
I added it to ELBOW (upthread). A bumper week with 13 polls including Survation.OnlyLivingBoy said:
I would assume it's correct, I saw it quoted in the NY Times. The gap has closed by 3 points I believe, from 14 to 11pp. The former always seemed a little high from Survation. Full tables normally seem to be available on Mondays, I expect to update my model tomorrow.nico67 said:
It seems to have been pulled from Britain Elects . Could it be a fake poll or is it correct but just leaked . Do we have confirmation yet.CorrectHorseBattery said:
One was leaked today, Labour closing the gap by one point, to 30, Tories on 41Benpointer said:
Aren't we due another Survation poll or have I missed one this weekend?CorrectHorseBattery said:
He's an interesting one to watch for sure. He seems quite cynical about the polls in general, probably because of how much he was ridiculed last time.nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
0 -
It came from Rentaul I think. Suspect he accidentally broke an embargo - he’d otherwise have corrected it.OnlyLivingBoy said:
I would assume it's correct, I saw it quoted in the NY Times. The gap has closed by 3 points I believe, from 14 to 11pp. The former always seemed a little high from Survation. Full tables normally seem to be available on Mondays, I expect to update my model tomorrow.nico67 said:
It seems to have been pulled from Britain Elects . Could it be a fake poll or is it correct but just leaked . Do we have confirmation yet.CorrectHorseBattery said:
One was leaked today, Labour closing the gap by one point, to 30, Tories on 41Benpointer said:
Aren't we due another Survation poll or have I missed one this weekend?CorrectHorseBattery said:
He's an interesting one to watch for sure. He seems quite cynical about the polls in general, probably because of how much he was ridiculed last time.nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
0 -
That's nothing to do with women's pension age, a man of the same age would be in exactly the same positionnichomar said:My wife is 65 next July she has had exactly zero notification that her state pension does not start til July 2021 not one single communication.
0 -
Watford were good once.....Ave_it said:I voted Labour once!
0 -
True enough, although that's due to parliamentary arithmetic, so the actual effect of the FPTA on that is questionable. If anything the FPTA has ensured the average term is longer than it would otherwise have been since, its meant our politicians kept governments with no effect means of operating in place.SirBenjamin said:
Well, 33.3% of the time, maybe.timmo said:
If they get a decent majority why would they do that? It's a guaranteed 5 yearspartypoliticalorphan said:Scanned the Conservative manifesto. Lots of wriggle room in most of it but emphatic that they will scrap the Fixed Term Parliament Act. That should get a lot of thumbs ups on here.
The average parliamentary term prior to the FTPA was far closer to five years than it has been since the Act was introduced...
0 -
[swaggering] Man, I've been on all of National Rail routes in England & Wales save for weekend-only stuff like Dale Rail and the Stockport-Guide Bridge (but I have done the Gainsborough-Brigg line and Crediton-Okehampton)!Cookie said:
Talking of which - Sunil - ever been on this little fella?squareroot2 said:
If you are a sad train loon?Sunil_Prasannan said:
"I'll tell you a riddle. You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure. But it doesn't matter. How can it not matter to you where the train will take you?"Time_to_Leave said:
No that only tells you where I should be and where I’m meant to be going.geoffw said:
Are you sure your Trainline app doesn't tell Google?Time_to_Leave said:
Point of order - based on my trains into London, knowing I’ve caught one tells you very little little about either where I am or where I am going.RobD said:
Plus the state knowing exactly where you are going all the time. Spooky!ozymandias said:
And rely on the State anytime we want to travel. Marvellous.CorrectHorseBattery said:
They're better than petrol and diesel cars - and if there is no reasonable public transport they seem like a good compromise. But fundamentally we need to transition away from private transport.RobD said:
Not a fan of electric cars?CorrectHorseBattery said:
I personally think we should be encouraging the use of public transport as much as possible and phasing out cars entirely - that should be the ultimate goal IMHOdellertronic said:
As a childless singleton that doesn't drive I don't care about either. But anybody claiming to be green should oppose both subsiding care pollution and over population.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Do you honestly think potholes deserve more money than childcare though?RobD said:
I know, they seem small in comparison to Labour's trillion pound bill, but it's still a lot of money.CorrectHorseBattery said:£2Bn for potholes
£1Bn for childcare
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre_Metro_Operations
In Scotland, done all of Scotrail except for Inverness to Aberdeen, Inverness to Kyle and Dingwall to Wick/Thurso.1 -
In the game of election timing it hands the advantage to the opposition instead of the incumbent.kle4 said:
True enough, although that's due to parliamentary arithmetic, so the actual effect of the FPTA on that is questionable. If anything the FPTA has ensured the average term is longer than it would otherwise have been since, its meant our politicians kept governments with no effect means of operating in place.SirBenjamin said:
Well, 33.3% of the time, maybe.timmo said:
If they get a decent majority why would they do that? It's a guaranteed 5 yearspartypoliticalorphan said:Scanned the Conservative manifesto. Lots of wriggle room in most of it but emphatic that they will scrap the Fixed Term Parliament Act. That should get a lot of thumbs ups on here.
The average parliamentary term prior to the FTPA was far closer to five years than it has been since the Act was introduced...
0 -
Incumbent LAB MP standing down, maj. last time 3884, UKIP vote 3704. BXP are down as standing, though.Brom said:Blimey this report on BBC News at 10 from from Rother Valley is not great for Labour and Corbyn.
If the Tories can flip Rother Valley, then LAB are going to get rinsed in the North.0 -
0
-
Yes, the Nick Timothy thought the same about old people and decided to introduce the idiotic dementia tax. That turned out extremely well.kle4 said:
I think most of that range as so solidly Labour they won't be going anywhere, which is why they feel able to make such an unfair policy in the first place.MaxPB said:
Labour are about to test that theory to destruction in the 25-34 age range unless they u-turn on the £58bn. I haven't seen my non-politically inclined friends this annoyed by a single policy in a very long time. Until now they just thought Corbyn was a joke with his free broadband and oddball ideas, now they think he's going to tax all of them to pay for older wealthy women who want to retire early.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Always interesting at how much more the young voter is pro Labour than the male one.PeterMannion said:
Might we see the biggest gender divide this election?RobD said:
£15,380 average, £31,300 maximum. A huge bung.Benpointer said:
Wow thanks for that insight!geoffw said:
Number of women affected times the average amount of compensation.Benpointer said:
Are there some workings behind the £58bn?BluerBlue said:
Will the question include the information that it will cost the public an extra £58 billion in uncosted borrowing and / or taxes? Because that seems like a relevant piece of context, no?nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
I was rather wondering if anyone has the stats on numbers impacted and avereage amount per person.
https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-2019-labours-58bn-pledge-to-right-waspi-injustice-118690050 -
Inverness to Kyle is beautiful.Sunil_Prasannan said:
[swaggering] Man, I've been on all of National Rail routes in England & Wales save for weekend-only stuff like Dale Rail and the Stockport-Guide Bridge (but I have done the Gainsborough-Brigg line and Crediton-Okehampton)!Cookie said:
Talking of which - Sunil - ever been on this little fella?squareroot2 said:
If you are a sad train loon?Sunil_Prasannan said:
"I'll tell you a riddle. You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure. But it doesn't matter. How can it not matter to you where the train will take you?"Time_to_Leave said:
No that only tells you where I should be and where I’m meant to be going.geoffw said:
Are you sure your Trainline app doesn't tell Google?Time_to_Leave said:
Point of order - based on my trains into London, knowing I’ve caught one tells you very little little about either where I am or where I am going.RobD said:
Plus the state knowing exactly where you are going all the time. Spooky!ozymandias said:
And rely on the State anytime we want to travel. Marvellous.CorrectHorseBattery said:
They're better than petrol and diesel cars - and if there is no reasonable public transport they seem like a good compromise. But fundamentally we need to transition away from private transport.RobD said:
Not a fan of electric cars?CorrectHorseBattery said:
I personally think we should be encouraging the use of public transport as much as possible and phasing out cars entirely - that should be the ultimate goal IMHOdellertronic said:
As a childless singleton that doesn't drive I don't care about either. But anybody claiming to be green should oppose both subsiding care pollution and over population.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Do you honestly think potholes deserve more money than childcare though?RobD said:
I know, they seem small in comparison to Labour's trillion pound bill, but it's still a lot of money.CorrectHorseBattery said:£2Bn for potholes
£1Bn for childcare
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre_Metro_Operations
In Scotland, done all of Scotrail except for Inverness to Aberdeen, Inverness to Kyle and Dingwall to Wick/Thurso.0 -
1923 was in a mild interlude after a snowy November.Sunil_Prasannan said:
1918?Benpointer said:Met Office long range forecast for December:
Sunday 8 Dec - Sunday 22 Dec
The period is likely to begin on the cold side for most regions, with wintry showers at times in the north, and perhaps over high ground in the south. Widespread frosts and ice are also likely. There looks to be a change around mid-month to milder conditions, although the timing is very uncertain.
What could possibly go wrong with a December election?
1923?
It would be bad luck to have snow affect the vote, but it is more likely in December than in May.0 -
6th December 1923 might not be a good template for the ToriesSunil_Prasannan said:
1918?Benpointer said:Met Office long range forecast for December:
Sunday 8 Dec - Sunday 22 Dec
The period is likely to begin on the cold side for most regions, with wintry showers at times in the north, and perhaps over high ground in the south. Widespread frosts and ice are also likely. There looks to be a change around mid-month to milder conditions, although the timing is very uncertain.
What could possibly go wrong with a December election?
1923?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1923_United_Kingdom_general_election0 -
Have you done all the Cornish branch lines? They’re fabulously quaint.Sunil_Prasannan said:
[swaggering] Man, I've been on all of National Rail routes in England & Wales save for weekend-only stuff like Dale Rail and the Stockport-Guide Bridge (but I have done the Gainsborough-Brigg line and Crediton-Okehampton)!Cookie said:
Talking of which - Sunil - ever been on this little fella?squareroot2 said:
If you are a sad train loon?Sunil_Prasannan said:
"I'll tell you a riddle. You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure. But it doesn't matter. How can it not matter to you where the train will take you?"Time_to_Leave said:
No that only tells you where I should be and where I’m meant to be going.geoffw said:
Are you sure your Trainline app doesn't tell Google?Time_to_Leave said:
Point of order - based on my trains into London, knowing I’ve caught one tells you very little little about either where I am or where I am going.RobD said:
Plus the state knowing exactly where you are going all the time. Spooky!ozymandias said:
And rely on the State anytime we want to travel. Marvellous.CorrectHorseBattery said:
They're better than petrol and diesel cars - and if there is no reasonable public transport they seem like a good compromise. But fundamentally we need to transition away from private transport.RobD said:
Not a fan of electric cars?CorrectHorseBattery said:
I personally think we should be encouraging the use of public transport as much as possible and phasing out cars entirely - that should be the ultimate goal IMHOdellertronic said:
As a childless singleton that doesn't drive I don't care about either. But anybody claiming to be green should pollution and over population.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Do you honestly think potholes deserve more money than childcare though?RobD said:
I know, they seem small in comparison to Labour's trillion pound bill, but it's still a lot of money.CorrectHorseBattery said:£2Bn for potholes
£1Bn for childcare
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre_Metro_Operations
In Scotland, done all of Scotrail except for Inverness to Aberdeen, Inverness to Kyle and Dingwall to Wick/Thurso.
Perranwell. Menheniot. Luxulyan!0 -
But it is down more for Labour so the effect is a swing to the Tories.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Wut? The Tory vote is down amongst that age groupMarqueeMark said:
5% swing Lab -> ConsHYUFD said:0 -
He suggested it, May decided.MaxPB said:
Yes, the Nick Timothy thought the same about old people and decided to introduce the idiotic dementia tax. That turned out extremely well.kle4 said:
I think most of that range as so solidly Labour they won't be going anywhere, which is why they feel able to make such an unfair policy in the first place.MaxPB said:
Labour are about to test that theory to destruction in the 25-34 age range unless they u-turn on the £58bn. I haven't seen my non-politically inclined friends this annoyed by a single policy in a very long time. Until now they just thought Corbyn was a joke with his free broadband and oddball ideas, now they think he's going to tax all of them to pay for older wealthy women who want to retire early.CorrectHorseBattery said:
Always interesting at how much more the young voter is pro Labour than the male one.PeterMannion said:
Might we see the biggest gender divide this election?RobD said:
£15,380 average, £31,300 maximum. A huge bung.Benpointer said:
Wow thanks for that insight!geoffw said:
Number of women affected times the average amount of compensation.Benpointer said:
Are there some workings behind the £58bn?BluerBlue said:
Will the question include the information that it will cost the public an extra £58 billion in uncosted borrowing and / or taxes? Because that seems like a relevant piece of context, no?nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
I was rather wondering if anyone has the stats on numbers impacted and avereage amount per person.
https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-2019-labours-58bn-pledge-to-right-waspi-injustice-11869005
And you're right, sometimes a policy will get such a push back, but I don't think this one will, for all I am very mad about it. To who will Labour inclined voters mad about it go? The LDs are offering the same thing in their manifesto, though I've not heard what the amount would be suggested to be, presumably the same. The Greens' plan is more focused on their Universal Basic Income idea with a focus on the WASPI women, but promises additional ways to compensate them as well. BXP promise to review the position of those women too.
So are young people who were going to turn out for Labour not going to turn out for them on this issue, when the Jezziah is busy saying what a moral duty it is?0 -
"He may not be trustworthy but I do like him"AramintaMoonbeamQC said:
Incumbent LAB MP standing down, maj. last time 3884, UKIP vote 3704. BXP are down as standing, though.Brom said:Blimey this report on BBC News at 10 from from Rother Valley is not great for Labour and Corbyn.
If the Tories can flip Rother Valley, then LAB are going to get rinsed in the North.
0 -
Can't attack the facts then attack the person pointing them out. Typical Labour BS.EPG said:
Case in point. Convicted criminal masquerading as a journalist but pushing lines that are helpful to one party.kjohnw1 said:
https://twitter.com/guidofawkes/status/1198627938067001344?s=12Gallowgate said:
Anyone who believes 350m for the NHS should be too thick to vote.Philip_Thompson said:
Anyone who believes an unfunded £58bn pledge made after the manifesto was published should be too thick to vote.nico67 said:I wonder whether Damian Lyons Lowe from Survation are doing some polling including a question on the Waspi women . Going by his tweet he thinks this is likely to hurt the Tories.
0 -
The casting is not so good, but the writing has been bad. I wondered whether part of it was that HMQ is now comfortable in her role and so that element of narrative tension is completely gone. I think the balance between the family story and the national story has been all wrong. If you compare the episode with the killer London smog with the one with the miners dispute and they don't properly resolve the story of the dispute with the miners.Casino_Royale said:
It's not just that. It's the casting.DecrepiterJohnL said:
The trouble is probably that as we come up to date, the writers lose historical perspective and start including all sorts of trivial incidents that they happen to remember. We have seen this with other series too.Casino_Royale said:Just finished season three of The Crown.
Rather slow and nothing like as good as the first two.
Wilson and Heath are good though. The episodes slow and tedious, except Aberfan.
Olivia Coleman gets better as the series goes on but you still know it's her.
And Helena Bonham-Carter is just Helena Bonham-Carter, as always. You're never convinced for a second she's Margaret.
Having said that, Tobias Menzies is superb as Philip.
So it looks like they've put more emphasis on the personal side of the story when that has become less interesting.0 -
Crumbs.geoffw said:
"He may not be trustworthy but I do like him"AramintaMoonbeamQC said:
Incumbent LAB MP standing down, maj. last time 3884, UKIP vote 3704. BXP are down as standing, though.Brom said:Blimey this report on BBC News at 10 from from Rother Valley is not great for Labour and Corbyn.
If the Tories can flip Rother Valley, then LAB are going to get rinsed in the North.
Corbyn has v little appeal in places like Rawmarsh and Rotherham.
The 'Boris is a bit of an idiot, but I quite like him' vote might see the Tories over the line.0 -
Ilford South is safe for Labour, despite Gapes. Gapes wasn’t hugely popular with many Asian voters there even when he was in Labour.another_richard said:
You think there is a chance of the Conservatives gaining Ilford North ???stodge said:Evening all
Back to betting rather than the bear-pit for a moment.
I'm still sitting on my BUY of Conservative seats at 325 - should I cash out now and take a reasonable profit or should I stick it out? I think 360-380 is the range and I'd prefer more than 380 for obvious reasons - might happen but less certain than I was.
Looking at the election battles in East London, I can back Labour to win East Ham at 1/100 with Paddy and Betfair, not a bad bet and if you have £100k lying around and you want to have £101k on 13/12 it's as much a certainty as anything in this life.
The three seats which interest me in my neck of the woods are as follows:
Dagenham & Rainham: - Jon Cruddas is defending a majority of 4,652 and the Conservatives need a 5% swing which is right on the mark of the polls. The Tories are marginally favourites and you can bet 9/10 with Bet365 while Labour are Evens with Sky Bet which looks tempting. Many firms have both parties odds on suggesting this is going to be very close. For now, I'll stay out.
Ilford South: Mike Gapes held for Labour last time with a majority of 31.647 but he has defected to and is running as a Change UK - TIG candidate. He is on offer at 3s generally with Labour at 1/5. It's my experience MPs have an exaggerated view of their "personal" vote and I can't see Gapes holding this seat - indeed, I think he'll finish third. Labour at 1/5 looks a cracking bet.
Ilford North: Against the run of play, this was a rare Conservative loss in 2015 when Wes Streeting got home by 589 votes. Despite no UKIP candidate in 2017, Streeting stretched his majority to nearly 10,000. There is a BXP candidate this time and Labour are 1/5 with the Conservatives at 3s.
I simply can't understand how Labour are 1/5 in both Ilford seats - both prices are absurd. Labour should be 1/20 to hold Ilford South and shouldn't even be favourites to hold North.
I don't like betting odds on but the 1/5 for Labour to hold South is very tempting while the 3/1 for the Conservatives to take North is also worth a punt.
I really can't see how they can overturn a near 10k majority in a seat which is moving demographically away from them.
You're right about Ilford South though.
I reckon Wes is safe in Ilford North. Ongoing demographic change there, plus he has built quite a profile, and is seen as anti Corbyn. I doubt the Tories will get that close.0 -
Yes I have, Sean, er I mean Byronic. Even did the full reverse into Coombe Junction Halt.Byronic said:
Have you done all the Cornish branch lines? They’re fabulously quaint.Sunil_Prasannan said:
[swaggering] Man, I've been on all of National Rail routes in England & Wales save for weekend-only stuff like Dale Rail and the Stockport-Guide Bridge (but I have done the Gainsborough-Brigg line and Crediton-Okehampton)!Cookie said:
Talking of which - Sunil - ever been on this little fella?squareroot2 said:
If you are a sad train loon?Sunil_Prasannan said:
"I'll tell you a riddle. You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure. But it doesn't matter. How can it not matter to you where the train will take you?"Time_to_Leave said:
No that only tells you where I should be and where I’m meant to be going.geoffw said:
Are you sure your Trainline app doesn't tell Google?Time_to_Leave said:
Point of order - based on my trains into London, knowing I’ve caught one tells you very little little about either where I am or where I am going.RobD said:
Plus the state knowing exactly where you are going all the time. Spooky!ozymandias said:
And rely on the State anytime we want to travel. Marvellous.CorrectHorseBattery said:
They're better than petrol and diesel cars - and if there is no reasonable public transport they seem like a good compromise. But fundamentally we need to transition away from private transport.RobD said:
Not a fan of electric cars?CorrectHorseBattery said:
I personally think we should be encouraging the use of public transport as much as possible and phasing out cars entirely - that should be the ultimate goal IMHOdellertronic said:
As a childless singleton that doesn't drive I don't care about either. But anybody claiming to be green should pollution and over population.CorrectHorseBattery said:RobD said:CorrectHorseBattery said:£2Bn for potholes
£1Bn for childcare
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre_Metro_Operations
In Scotland, done all of Scotrail except for Inverness to Aberdeen, Inverness to Kyle and Dingwall to Wick/Thurso.
Perranwell. Menheniot. Luxulyan!0