Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » On the day Johnson wants for the general election the UK sunse

135678

Comments

  • alex. said:

    A Prime Minister traditionally can’t resign without a recommendation of either an election or an alternative PM who can command the confidence of the Commons. So doesn’t apply here.
    Not really. As the Cabinet Manual makes clear, the monarch doesn't have to ask for a recommendation. The convention is merely that outgoing PM should be prepared to offer a recommendation if asked. And a PM who has lost the confidence of the House is not entitled to have that advice accepted.

    The problem I was referring to was 'Number 10 sources' apparently saying that Johnson would not resign even if a vote of no confidence was passed and the Commons had resolved that a specific other person should be appointed PM.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,746
    SunnyJim said:

    Almost as bad as remainers cheering on a votes for 16 year olds amendment.
    Not even remotely comparable. Openly and lawfully seeking to extend the franchise to people who cannot currently vote can be debated and determined according to the merits. Seeking to deny the franchise to people who already have it through no fault of their own is a quite different matter.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,292

    Why is it voter suppression? They can vote at home.
    Putting barriers in the way of voting is the essence of voter suppression. That seems to be Tory party policy now.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,400

    You have to decide what constitutes "a lot" in this context before looking at the data, but there's population pyramids available here. https://www.populationpyramid.net/united-kingdom/1974/

    1.6% of 56.1 million in the relevant age bracket. Nearly 900k.

    What proportion would have served? Probably quite high, and even if relatively low you're still looking at a couple of hundred thousand WWI veterans. Which would mean the high hundreds per constituency.
    Yes, and you’d have a much larger number of WWII veterans on top.

    My point is that in understanding such a high turnout we have to understand that it was also informed by millions of voters who’d personally served in the cause of defending democracy by force of arms, and saw voting in all weathers as a duty.

    So we must be careful of comparing them and us today directly.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,746
    HYUFD said:

    Baldwin still won most seats last time there was a December election and the LDs will not back Corbyn as the Liberals then propped up MacDonald.

    In December 1918 the Tories won a majority of seats and in December 1910 the Tories won the popular vote.

    The Tories have thus never lost the popular vote or most seats in a December general election
    Let Labour worry about that. You should worry about who will prop up the Tories a not impossible hung Parliament.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,802

    I'd argue that Corbyn STILL hasn't got the hang of PMQs.
    You're expecting an argument ?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,487
    Comparing elections to another referendum is a dumb argument from pro-EU types. This is bringing forward something that happens regularly anyway.

    Instead of titillating themselves, those who actually want another vote should return to the more compelling argument/line of "informed consent".
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    Nigelb said:

    Six Rees Moggs braying.
    Seven Trots-a-Trotting
    Eight Remainers Roaring.
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    DougSeal said:


    Not even remotely comparable. Openly and lawfully seeking to extend the franchise to people who cannot currently vote can be debated and determined according to the merits. Seeking to deny the franchise to people who already have it through no fault of their own is a quite different matter.

    And how would these students be denied the franchise?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,802

    Comparing elections to another referendum is a dumb argument from pro-EU types. This is bringing forward something that happens regularly anyway.

    Because some mandates that people might later regret are more valid than others ?

    I think the comparison valid.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,121
    DougSeal said:

    Let Labour worry about that. You should worry about who will prop up the Tories a not impossible hung Parliament.
    Provided the Tories have more MPs than Labour and the SNP and Plaid and the Greens they will stay in power if the LDs abstain
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    Well this guy has no proper command of English and his tweet is nonsense. How many voters actually realised it was a FTP?
    Rather than descending to ad hominem attacks why not try to fault his logic?
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Foxy said:


    Putting barriers in the way of voting is the essence of voter suppression. That seems to be Tory party policy now.

    Registering to vote is 'putting up barriers'?

    Corollary, there should be no voter checks?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,400

    You don’t think name calling is a sign of losing an argument?
    I’m neither calling you names nor losing the argument.

    I was just pointing out that yours was pathetic.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,601

    So the message from Johnson is now: ‘Let’s not get Brexit done! Let’s have an election instead!’ I’d suggest the opposition parties should allow him to have his election, and point out to voters that he’s wasting their time.

    Exactly! It's why he needs to try for the WAIB even without an election. Either he succeeds and delivers Brexit, or he gets more evidence of parliament trying to stop Brexit. Don't try and just how much does he want it?

    He will do anything to get Brexit except try hard apparently.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,825
    SunnyJim said:

    Listening to Chukka yesterday he'd pretty much given up on the idea of R2 with the current composition of parliament.

    Yes, Ref2 comes only with a Lab govt after a GE. Therefore unlikely. Can be laid at 3 and that, for my money, is one of the better political bets around right now.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,292

    Yes, and you’d have a much larger number of WWII veterans on top.

    My point is that in understanding such a high turnout we have to understand that it was also informed by millions of voters who’d personally served in the cause of defending democracy by force of arms, and saw voting in all weathers as a duty.

    So we must be careful of comparing them and us today directly.
    The numbers of WW2 veterans who made for such high turnouts in 1950 would have been huge still in 1974. This interviews filmed in 63 and 64 are with a fairly spritely bunch. Many more would still be around a decade later.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/group/p01tbj6p

    I remember admitting WW1 vets and chatting with them well into the nineties.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658

    Agreed. And how about this for a really alarming poll? Most people think violence is worthwhile to get the Brexit result they want. Economic decline is worthwhile. The breakup of the country is worthwhile. The end of both agriculture and fishing is worthwhile.

    That, ladies and gentlemen, is fanaticism. And it's gripped MOST voters on both sides.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/24/majority-of-voters-think-violence-against-mps-is-price-worth-paying-for-brexit
    Yes
    nico67 said:

    The EU wouldn’t risk that . It would look terrible to force the Commons into voting for the deal with hardly any scrutiny. Secondly the European Parliament needs to ratify , they can’t do it at short notice .

    The issue is the length of the extension not whether there will be one . Macron is not going to veto causing a no deal . He has to work with 26 countries in the future , he’s not going to put all that at risk for a departing member .
    I think you also have to factor in the outside possibility of the EU Parliament voting down the deal or at least being very unhappy. The EU leaders won’t want to face accusations that they haven’t given them enough time for scrutiny either.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155

    Well this guy has no proper command of English and his tweet is nonsense. How many voters actually realised it was a FTP?
    Can't tell if sarcasm or proves point of tweet...
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,487
    Mr. B, every mandate to hold office is temporary. Both sides proclaimed that the referendum was a one-off and the result would be honoured.

    An argument on this ground is not conducive to pro-EU types winning. They're much better off going with the informed consent line.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,746
    HYUFD said:

    Provided the Tories have more MPs than Labour and the SNP and Plaid and the Greens they will stay in power if the LDs abstain
    That’s a very big ‘if’.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Ian Blackford on Today: would prefer election on 5th December.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,825
    HYUFD said:

    It would only be extended further if the legislation for EUref2 had got through this Parliament which is unlikely given DUP and Labour MPs from Leave seats opposition, so that means a general election or No Deal if the Withdrawal Agreement is not passed by the end of November into law

    I think the EU will always agree to extend if a No Deal exit would result from them not doing so.
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    SunnyJim said:

    Good, it's a stupid idea.

    The government should just keep pressing their case in a way that paints the opposition in an intransigent/scared/dishonest light.

    Eventually Corbyn will cave and either vote the deal through pretty much as it is or he will agree to a GE.

    He doesn't have any other realistic options.
    It’s “zombie parliament blocking the people’s brexit” one minute and unable to explain why the urgent deal with a majority of thirty isn’t before Parliament the next. Holistically it doesn’t make a peanut of sense.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,601
    edited October 2019
    They're just having a bit of fun. I think they're annoyed our mps want to use what they will do as an excuse for their actions, when the eu would prefer to respond to our actions. So some slight messing with us, without truly forcing us.
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749

    It is spectacularly stupid. Rewind a week, and when parliament said it wanted more scrutiny, negotiate the number of days up from 3 to around 6, job done, Brexit passed.

    Now they present Labour with the opportunity to show the Tories refusing to progress Brexit and looking childish!
    How can anyone go from from the triumph of a week ago, to the Trumpesque spouting of inanities the next? To simply blame Jeremy Corbyn for that change of fortune makes Corbyn look a better politician than he actually is.
  • kinabalu said:

    The extension would need to be considerably longer than 31 January for a referendum to take place.
    And that is why I argued earlier that a GE is the best chance for a legitimate referendum as it is far from certain Boris will get a majority and it is possible it could be a remain parliament thereby opening the pathway to a referendum
  • philiph said:

    With any luck between now and 12th December some innovative person will invent the overcoat, and with any luck Street lighting.

    Who in thier right mind thinks we as a population are so pathetic that we can't get out in cold windy conditions.

    Yup, the country of drone hysteria and 'call the police, the chicken's run out' will rise to the challenge once again.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,292
    SunnyJim said:

    Registering to vote is 'putting up barriers'?

    Corollary, there should be no voter checks?
    Timing an election to make it difficult to register, yes.

    There is virtually no evidence of impersonation at polling booths under present systems.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,400

    No, that’s a total misrepresentation of what I said, and you know it.

    I said that the veterans accounted for a much higher voting base and propensity to vote. The crisis feeling of Feb 1974 and perceived closeness of the election drove higher turnout all round. Neither did I say they accounted for all of the voting increase.

    I have no interest in canvassing or not canvassing. Only in correctly predicting outcomes and making money out of politics, where I have a much better record than you, who are mainly interested in political spin.

    You wouldn’t understand data if it hit you square nose on the face.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,177
    148grss said:

    Can't tell if sarcasm or proves point of tweet...
    The irony is lost!
  • Mr. B, every mandate to hold office is temporary. Both sides proclaimed that the referendum was a one-off and the result would be honoured.

    An argument on this ground is not conducive to pro-EU types winning. They're much better off going with the informed consent line.

    You are assuming the argument is for a 2nd ref. What if the argument being made is for not allowing the PM to choose an election date during a fixed term parliament?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,400
    Foxy said:

    The numbers of WW2 veterans who made for such high turnouts in 1950 would have been huge still in 1974. This interviews filmed in 63 and 64 are with a fairly spritely bunch. Many more would still be around a decade later.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/group/p01tbj6p

    I remember admitting WW1 vets and chatting with them well into the nineties.
    I envy you. I’d have loved to have had that opportunity.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,746

    Well this guy has no proper command of English and his tweet is nonsense. How many voters actually realised it was a FTP?
    Now you have made your feelings about the tweeter clear, perhaps you would like to address the substance of his argument and his heavy implication of Brexiteer hypocrisy in stating that the voters didn’t realise the all the implications of their vote in 2017 but did in 2016?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,802

    Mr. B, every mandate to hold office is temporary. Both sides proclaimed that the referendum was a one-off and the result would be honoured.

    An argument on this ground is not conducive to pro-EU types winning. They're much better off going with the informed consent line.

    The two arguments are not mutually exclusive.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,601
    edited October 2019

    It is spectacularly stupid. Rewind a week, and when parliament said it wanted more scrutiny, negotiate the number of days up from 3 to around 6, job done, Brexit passed.

    Now they present Labour with the opportunity to show the Tories refusing to progress Brexit and looking childish!
    We want to get this done, and we have the numbers too. But we dont wanna now because you're mean.

    That's the strategy. It definitely sounds like something a political adviser comes up with, particularly ones who like to push scorched earth ideas
  • Why does a decision have to be made by 31st January? The lessons from the last year are of ongoing paralysis. Perhaps the decision on Brexit will be made by then, but it is far from certain and not necessary.
    Because we are right royally creating chaos in the governance of the EU and France along with others are demanding this is done and for both sides to move on. And they are not bluffing
  • SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Foxy said:


    Timing an election to make it difficult to register, yes.

    There is virtually no evidence of impersonation at polling booths under present systems.


    Taken from the UCAS website explaining how to register:


    ...Registering online only takes about three minutes, so there are no excuses!


  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    HYUFD said:
    These electors are supposed to be Labour's core vote.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,487
    Mr. Above, if the Commons refuse to back a deal, refuse to back a revocation, refuse to have a vote of no confidence in the Government, and refuse to agree anything else the logical conclusion is that this Commons is no good for anything but prevarication.

    [Of course, the next Commons could be worse].
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,601
    DougSeal said:

    Not even remotely comparable. Openly and lawfully seeking to extend the franchise to people who cannot currently vote can be debated and determined according to the merits. Seeking to deny the franchise to people who already have it through no fault of their own is a quite different matter.
    Not quite the same thing, true, but introducing a major change so rapidly for percieved partisan advantage, as retaliation for pushing for an election, is not good governance either. If they want to do it they should do it properly, is that not what the timetable motion argument was all about?
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    I see the Daily Mail (formerly Andrew Wakefield’s biggest fan) is this morning claiming a “triumph” in their “campaign” to increase MMR rates. You couldn’t make this shit up.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,678

    Morning Nick Palmer, will you be campaigning for Anna Soubry in your shared seat?

    No, I'll be campaigning for the Remain-supporting Labour candidate, Greg Marshall (who I expect to win).
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,031
    edited October 2019
    AndyJS said:

    Ian Blackford on Today: would prefer election on 5th December.

    That's fine by me
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449

    Well this guy has no proper command of English and his tweet is nonsense. How many voters actually realised it was a FTP?
    Not sure if the above is sarcastic or not, but we’ve had maximum term parliaments since the 18th Century
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Some pretty awful by-election results for Labour last night I think...
  • Casino somehow thinks that WW1 veterans who hadn’t gone out to vote in June 1970 were suddenly motivated to go out in February 1974, despite it being winter and them being 4 years older, increasing turnout by nearly 7%. Its horsefeathers on stilts.

    I can understand why he doesn’t want to canvas in December (and hats off to those who do, of whatever party) but as I observed earlier this “winter GEs are bad” is special pleading, not based on data.
    That's not what he said, he even prefaced his comment with saying what you wrote was true!

    What he said was that 45 years ago was a long time ago and as a matter of context there were a large number of pensioners who were WWI voters in 74 (and yes 70 and earlier) while that isn't true now.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    December weather is often quite mild in this country compared to what one might expect. January and February tend to be the coldest months with the most snow, ice, fog, etc.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,292

    I envy you. I’d have loved to have had that opportunity.
    Admitting patients, and getting to know them is one of the great pleasures of my job. Very few elderly people have never done something of interest, and hearing their tales is a window into real history.

    I remember chatting to one retired insurance agent from suburban Leicester, one of 4 from 36 in his Fleet Air Arm training squadron who survived, another who got an MC at Imphal as a junior officer, a Dunkirk veteran from the RA telling how they destroyed their guns on the beach before getting out by taking key parts and chucking them in the sea etc etc.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658

    That's fine by me
    Will anyone think of the poor people who actually have to administer these elections. It’s bad enough having to do it at short notice, even worse if you get an inkling if a date that you can start doing some proper planning for only for people to start trying to shift it marginally for no good reason, and just make it all harder.

  • 148grss said:
    Because almost all the MPs elected - even Wollaston, Soubry and Umunma - were elected on manifestos of respecting the referendum but now they're refusing to do so. They've breached what they were elected to do.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    alex. said:

    Will anyone think of the poor people who actually have to administer these elections. It’s bad enough having to do it at short notice, even worse if you get an inkling if a date that you can start doing some proper planning for only for people to start trying to shift it marginally for no good reason, and just make it all harder.

    Councils had to suddenly schedule the European elections earlier this year when they weren't supposed to be taking place at all since we were expected to have left the EU by that time, and they did it very efficiently.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    rcs1000 said:

    If you were HYUFD, you'd be claiming it was an iron rule.
    The only phrase I can say in a Belfast accent is “the iron law of historical necessity” - paisleys justification for saying NO
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    AndyJS said:

    December weather is often quite mild in this country compared to what one might expect. January and February tend to be the coldest months with the most snow, ice, fog, etc.

    One question which isn't being thought about enough is who now has the more difficult voter base to get out. With the transformation in both main parties' voter base in the last few years, the Conservatives should be careful about anything that puts voters off going to the polling stations.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    SunnyJim said:

    Listening to Chukka yesterday he'd pretty much given up on the idea of R2 with the current composition of parliament.
    It’s Chuka FFS. C H U K A.
  • No, I'll be campaigning for the Remain-supporting Labour candidate, Greg Marshall (who I expect to win).
    Good to be optimistic Nick
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    No, I'll be campaigning for the Remain-supporting Labour candidate, Greg Marshall (who I expect to win).
    Would you say Broxtowe is becoming similar to the neighbouring seat of Nottingham South over time?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    Charles said:

    The only phrase I can say in a Belfast accent is “the iron law of historical necessity” - paisleys justification for saying NO
    Have you decided whether to be Irish or not yet?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,574

    One question which isn't being thought about enough is who now has the more difficult voter base to get out. With the transformation in both main parties' voter base in the last few years, the Conservatives should be careful about anything that puts voters off going to the polling stations.
    Lines of broken glass won't stop those who feel they are being robbed of Brexit from voting.
  • The Saj rap on R4 this am:

    Zombie Parliament
    Zombie Parliament
    Zombie Parliament
    And can I just say
    Zombie Parliament

    Not one of life's sparklers, is he?
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    alex. said:

    Will anyone think of the poor people who actually have to administer these elections. It’s bad enough having to do it at short notice, even worse if you get an inkling if a date that you can start doing some proper planning for only for people to start trying to shift it marginally for no good reason, and just make it all harder.

    Not to mention public sector workers who have dealt with a shadow purdah for the last god knows how long. My dad was telling me his bosses wanted to enact purdah "just in case an election will be called" a month ago, and I'm sure some services have done just that.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    ydoethur said:

    Five canvassings
    Four polling cards
    Three French nons
    Two hurtful Goves
    And a Bozza in Oswestry.
    Five doesn’t work because it’s different notes

    (Five golden rings)

    How about

    Five joyful hacks
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Charles said:

    Five doesn’t work because it’s different notes

    (Five golden rings)

    How about

    Five joyful hacks
    It does work "Five can-va-sings"

    It also fits the original "ings", which sounds more satisfying.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,574
    AndyJS said:

    Councils had to suddenly schedule the European elections earlier this year when they weren't supposed to be taking place at all since we were expected to have left the EU by that time, and they did it very efficiently.
    I thought that councils had planned on them happening until told they weren't? Of course they were never told they weren't.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    edited October 2019

    I’m neither calling you names nor losing the argument.

    I was just pointing out that yours was pathetic.
    I rest my case. You said there were “facts” - but wouldn’t provide them, Thanks to others, it looks like there were several hundred thousand out of a total of 31 million Votes cast, when turnout increased by 3 million vs the previous election.
  • Because almost all the MPs elected - even Wollaston, Soubry and Umunma - were elected on manifestos of respecting the referendum but now they're refusing to do so. They've breached what they were elected to do.
    And the vote leave campaigners, Johnson, Gove, Cummings are putting forward a very different version of leave to that they campaigned on, they are trying to breach what they campaigned for.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    Is Bunter still promising to go on strike?
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    edited October 2019

    Mr. Above, if the Commons refuse to back a deal, refuse to back a revocation, refuse to have a vote of no confidence in the Government, and refuse to agree anything else the logical conclusion is that this Commons is no good for anything but prevarication.

    [Of course, the next Commons could be worse].

    Clearly this parliament is not great. That is a separate issue to whether the PM should be able to decide when the election is, when the law is clear that is for parliament to decide, and the mandate from the people is for 5 years.
  • alex. said:

    Will anyone think of the poor people who actually have to administer these elections. It’s bad enough having to do it at short notice, even worse if you get an inkling if a date that you can start doing some proper planning for only for people to start trying to shift it marginally for no good reason, and just make it all harder.

    With the greatest of respect not really
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    I don't think there will be an election but if there was my thoughts are Boris securing a deal is very important, it offers the voter clarity and a simple message regarding what a Tory government will bring. As long as Labour have a confused Brexit policy it will bother them throughout the campaign trail and they'll struggle to talk about the things they want.

    In such polarised times are people going to vote for a party that guarantees months and years more confusion?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,031
    edited October 2019

    One question which isn't being thought about enough is who now has the more difficult voter base to get out. With the transformation in both main parties' voter base in the last few years, the Conservatives should be careful about anything that puts voters off going to the polling stations.
    I will be offering a polling day taxi service (free) to my local constituency
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Have you decided whether to be Irish or not yet?
    I’m in no hurry to do so. Having two passports isn’t something that should be done lightly. I just mentioned it was an option if things become intolerable
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,574

    And the vote leave campaigners, Johnson, Gove, Cummings are putting forward a very different version of leave to that they campaigned on, they are trying to breach what they campaigned for.
    Nope. Nice try to deflect. But nope.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    Foxy said:

    Putting barriers in the way of voting is the essence of voter suppression. That seems to be Tory party policy now.
    Is asking for photo ID when collecting something at the post office delivery suppresion?
  • Nope. Nice try to deflect. But nope.
    Can we have all the benefits of the single market, no rulings from ECJ, golden trade deals negotiated in our favour with the rest of the world instantly please?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Charles said:

    The only phrase I can say in a Belfast accent is “the iron law of historical necessity” - paisleys justification for saying NO
    I always try to ask locals the time here at 8.30. It's a harmless pleasure.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    Charles said:

    I’m in no hurry to do so. Having two passports isn’t something that should be done lightly. I just mentioned it was an option if things become intolerable
    Another Leaver considering ways out of his decision.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    And the vote leave campaigners, Johnson, Gove, Cummings are putting forward a very different version of leave to that they campaigned on, they are trying to breach what they campaigned for.
    That's fine but the Conservatives are offering their Brexit to voters, which seems pretty democratic. If you don't like what they offer don't vote for them. Soubry, Wollaston and Umunna have changed parties (more than once) and still are trying to hide away from letting the public have a say on what they stand for. Boris may be many things but in the eyes of the British public he isn't the one looking like a coward.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,487
    Mr. Above, if this Parliament can agree on nothing when we have a clear decision to make, it can't fulfil its basic function.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,400

    I rest my case. You said there were “facts” - but wouldn’t provide them, Thanks to others, it looks like there were several hundred thousand out of a total of 31 million Votes cast, when turnout increased by 3 million vs the previous election.
    There’s no case to rest. You’re wrong, and I’m right.

    There were millions of veterans votes in 1974 that drove a very different voting culture. You’ve switched to a straw man now because you can’t defeat the original point.

    All you’ve done on here this morning is embarrass yourself. If you’re representative of the Tory point of view (and we’re supposed to be ON THE SAME SIDE) then Boris will get thumped.

    I have no more time to waste on morons like you. I now have to go and do some work.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    edited October 2019

    Can we have all the benefits of the single market, no rulings from ECJ, golden trade deals negotiated in our favour with the rest of the world instantly please?
    Also voters were obviously aware of the long tradition of MPs crossing the benches, being elected as individual representatives of their constituents rather than members of a party that enact a manifesto AND that MPs are under no legal or traditional obligation to hold a by election in those circumstances.

    Because voters always understand every possible implication of their vote, and that understanding is immutable and unchangeable until the next duly timed vote.
  • Brom said:

    That's fine but the Conservatives are offering their Brexit to voters, which seems pretty democratic. If you don't like what they offer don't vote for them. Soubry, Wollaston and Umunna have changed parties (more than once) and still are trying to hide away from letting the public have a say on what they stand for. Boris may be many things but in the eyes of the British public he isn't the one looking like a coward.
    When people talk about the British public they tend to talk about the parts of the British public they agree with. I and many others think Johnson is a coward, he has sought the benefits of office whilst shirking the responsibilities that come with it his whole life.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,705

    Clearly this parliament is not great. That is a separate issue to whether the PM should be able to decide when the election is, when the law is clear that is for parliament to decide, and the mandate from the people is for 5 years.
    The law is clear, he can ask Parliament, which is what he is doing on Monday.

    If there is no election agreed I am not sure what the EU will offer on the extension.

    They know that Parliament will not agree on anything. There is a deal on offer. An election is off the menu. Not ideal for them.

    The question they will want an answer to is:
    What is the point of and reason for the extension?

    The answer to that will guide the decision they make. The EU is capable of making decisions that bring about a solution to a problem. Because of the (as we see it) democratic deficit difficult decisions are easier and far more anonymous than those made by a National Parliament.

    I would not count out either a straight No or 2 to 4 weeks to pass the bill on offer.
  • And the vote leave campaigners, Johnson, Gove, Cummings are putting forward a very different version of leave to that they campaigned on, they are trying to breach what they campaigned for.
    You what?

    They campaigned that they would get a deal that would:
    Take back control of laws
    Take back control of money
    Take back control of borders
    Leave the ECJ
    Leave the Single Market
    Have a free trade deal with Europe
    Have our own trade policies with the rest of the world
    Maintain peace in Northern Ireland
    Extra money for the NHS

    They've managed to get a deal that would:
    Take back control of laws
    Take back control of money
    Take back control of borders
    Leave the ECJ
    Leave the Single Market
    Have a free trade deal with Europe
    Have our own trade policies with the rest of the world
    Maintain peace in Northern Ireland
    Extra money for the NHS

    If someone has a better way of meeting those promises I'd love to see it!
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684
    148grss said:

    It does work "Five can-va-sings"

    It also fits the original "ings", which sounds more satisfying.
    Five Doorbell Rings
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,121
    AndyJS said:

    These electors are supposed to be Labour's core vote.
    I believe Labour still leads with DEs, the poorest voters but even with them Boris leads Corbyn as best PM. The Tories have a big lead with skilled working class C2 voters
  • Mr. Above, if this Parliament can agree on nothing when we have a clear decision to make, it can't fulfil its basic function.

    Delay is a decision, and that is the decision parliament has taken. It is unlikely to be optimal but neither is it likely to be the worst case. It is the will of the people as expressed at the GE.
  • Dianne Abbott reportedly saying they want legislation taking no deal off the table

    The deal is there to sign
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    AndyJS said:

    December weather is often quite mild in this country compared to what one might expect. January and February tend to be the coldest months with the most snow, ice, fog, etc.

    Yes. If you look at the Central England Temperature series the average coldest time of year is at the end of January and beginning of February. So there will be more sunlight for an election in February, but greater potential for disruptive cold weather than in mid-December.
  • philiph said:

    The law is clear, he can ask Parliament, which is what he is doing on Monday.

    If there is no election agreed I am not sure what the EU will offer on the extension.

    They know that Parliament will not agree on anything. There is a deal on offer. An election is off the menu. Not ideal for them.

    The question they will want an answer to is:
    What is the point of and reason for the extension?

    The answer to that will guide the decision they make. The EU is capable of making decisions that bring about a solution to a problem. Because of the (as we see it) democratic deficit difficult decisions are easier and far more anonymous than those made by a National Parliament.

    I would not count out either a straight No or 2 to 4 weeks to pass the bill on offer.
    Of course he can ask parliament. He can even sulk and go on strike if he wants. His opponents can respond as they please, if they do not want an election at this particular time that is within their rights and perfectly democratic.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,845

    Delay is a decision, and that is the decision parliament has taken. It is unlikely to be optimal but neither is it likely to be the worst case. It is the will of the people as expressed at the GE.
    The will of the people at the GE can be viewed as having voted 4 to 1 for parties with a manifesto commitment to deliver on the referendum result.

    I fail to see how this never-ending cycle of delay is achieving that
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,292

    Is Bunter still promising to go on strike?

    How could we tell?
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    The Saj rap on R4 this am:

    Zombie Parliament
    Zombie Parliament
    Zombie Parliament
    And can I just say
    Zombie Parliament

    Not one of life's sparklers, is he?

    Not sure this zombie narrative will help the Tories - after all, if there is an election they will be asking the voters to re-elect many of the zombies who form the current parliament.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Brom said:

    That's fine but the Conservatives are offering their Brexit to voters, which seems pretty democratic. If you don't like what they offer don't vote for them. Soubry, Wollaston and Umunna have changed parties (more than once) and still are trying to hide away from letting the public have a say on what they stand for. Boris may be many things but in the eyes of the British public he isn't the one looking like a coward.
    They are not offering their Brexit Deal to voters; that would require a second referendum. Arguably now the best referendum question would be something along the lines of "do you want to leave the EU with this deal?" with the clear understanding that if they vote no it will not default to Remain but x more years of negotiation.

    What Johnson is asking is to be elected to government, on other policies as well as Brexit. If all their manifesto says is "we'll leave the EU, hell or high water" it could be any deal, May's deal, Johnson's deal, or No deal. They can also use an election as a mandate for a great many other things beyond Brexit, such as the NHS, crime, education etc. This is what GEs are for, not single issues like Brexit.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,405
    Charles said:

    I’m in no hurry to do so. Having two passports isn’t something that should be done lightly. I just mentioned it was an option if things become intolerable
    You're lucky. Some of us didn't vote for Brexit and have no such option.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    AndyJS said:

    Councils had to suddenly schedule the European elections earlier this year when they weren't supposed to be taking place at all since we were expected to have left the EU by that time, and they did it very efficiently.
    No they didn't. There were well publicised problems with posting ballots to voters living overseas and with the paperwork allowing EU citizens to vote in the UK rather than their home country.
  • Dianne Abbott reportedly saying they want legislation taking no deal off the table

    The deal is there to sign

    What does she want? There is one temporary and two permanent ways of taking no deal off the table.

    Temporary - Request an extension, already done! Just kicks the can, the deadline comes back later.

    Permanent: Agree a deal (there's one to sign already) or revoke A50.

    Which is her preference then?
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    Charles said:

    Five doesn’t work because it’s different notes

    (Five golden rings)

    How about

    Five joyful hacks
    On the sixth day of Christmas..

    Sixtus Rees-Mogg a-playing
This discussion has been closed.